Beautiful photography

[chrioii]

I enjoy watching, I thought pictures were marvelous; I really enjoyed the music too, I could listen to it all day.

[TheLightgrapher]

Excellent work, the best I've seen on youtube so far.

[rob71990]

a better music selection would be more pleasing as a video.

[daneshskater101]

These are truly beautiful photo's, really talented :]

Check out my photography videos :] i just started

[GR3ML1N0]

wonderful colors!

nice work amigo!

[daneshskater101]

Check out my Photography from europe :D

[daneshskater101]

Nice pictures, Hey people, im 16 and i was givin a very expensive camera because i was told i had the talent and that i should pursue it, take a look at "camping" and "The ranch" on my uploads and let me know how i am, im gonna have new uploads soon aswell

[aneroidbarometer]

Anyone who listens to this music and enjoys it is far from indie artistic, these images are so bland. The HDR was just an obvious bs bad attempt at resurrection.

[hondavalk]

Love the music. Nice.

[culing004]

amazing ^^ good job sir

[glassboxphotogeek1]

mmmm.....reflective HDR....:) Now that it's somewhat warmer outside, I think i'll give this a go! wanna try it on models too. would that work?

[Duarag]

Preciosas fotografías...felicidades! Un saludo...preciosa música

[stanegg0]

Some stunning images!!

[rickarr]

This is an old version before You Tube was able to Show Better quality videos.Please look at some of my latest creations. Thank You.

[wozaaap]

Why do you post this video with pics in the most horrible quality ever? What is the point with an HDR if you make it all blury afterwards?

[ack107aal]

nice picz very nice hdr, but horrid music !

[wanaraz1]

Why is it not in HD?

[yurirocks98]

this is awesome ima subscribe check out mine

[Fleshman00]

whats the name of the music you FUCK?

[XXchillioXX]

nice hdr pics!! good work! 5/5

[pidzky]

This is a great computer art, people just have different taste I guess. Indeed beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Nice job man.

[patme123]

I get the very same effect using just one photo. I always expose in RAW format for the highlights, then layer it in photoshop using Levels control to adjust each layer brightness level, then just use a layer mask to paint thru the various portions of the photo...exact same thing as HDR.

[pedalman]

you dont need a computer to do HDR, I can be done with multiple exposure and EV compensation. ( it could be done on film cameras also with multiple exposure where you dont wind the film forward between shots of different exposures. Do not change the aperture only the shutter speed.

take a look at LILKIWIMAN HDR tutorial to see how its done with a DSLR.

[atrc10]

there are no videos under LILKIWIMAN :( do you still have a link to that video?

[pedalman]

atrc10 , sorry I dont but try lilkiwiman ( lower case ) or search "HDR tutorial".

[V3474989]

Me da gusto poder leer en inglés y poder contestarles en español a la partida de comemierdas paradigmáticos que desprecian a todo aquel que no comparte sus puntos de vista creyéndose los Andy Warhol de la fotografía, clasificando los gustos por semejanza a los suyos hasta con desprecio...anden ya mojones...dejen a la gente ser felices lameculos..si no os gusta lo que veis sumerganse en su ego-universo y desahogen orgasmos oníricos...que clase de fascistas, joder!!!

[ibphotos]

What's all the drama over HDR?

It's a photographic technique, like the orton effect.

[mikongo]

Just the opening strains of the tinckley piano music tell you all you need to know about HDR photography. Sickly sweet, sentimental and vulgar, no wonder its so popular with americans.

[LS1NV]

A true photographer will most likely hate HDR, But a computer artist will love it. Personally I think it's the best of everything. Take some stunning SLR photos, HDR it then photshop it some more, In the end you are left with something that not any 1 of those could produce on it's own! Normal Photo's no matter how good you take them just seem a little dull and boring after a while,HDR spices it up as long as you don't go stupid on the effects/colours which I have seen.

[tsaudiovisual]

Like I have Said to All the people i know in Photography,HDR is Computer art and NOT Photography,the Photograph or combination of is just the start,Without the computer and todays software,one piece of artwork would take Hours of work in the dark room,so to be honest its not new ,just easier now than 30 years ago when I started.....But hey ,What would i know,i only spend 7 years at Chelsea Coll of Art & Design as a member of staff.

[speedracer68]

Breathtaking..simply beautiful..HDR rules!!!!

[magix93]

the problem is that any photo will look beautiful in HDR.

[yoyotuh]

it is beautiful...love the music as well...can you tell what is the title of the music?

[crispsting]

whats the background music?

[ModulatedSignal]

Nice work man! You're an inspiration!! How do you get those crazy colors to come out???

[UnknownOne23]

HDR..

[BlairMathis]

I love these. They are nicely done, and would make wonderful posters and prints. BTW, I'd like to meet the person that decided all photography should be perfect realism and smack him. Just like some artists draw perfect renditions of people, others (like Picaso) paint things that will never been found in nature, HDR is like turning a photograph into a surrealistic painting.

[DevilMaster]

Exactly. That's why I like HDR, and that's why I liked the photography of the Speed Racer movie.

Shame there isn't (yet) a way to do HDR in real time, though. I'd love a camera that makes HDR videos.

[Element9T8]

To be honest... they're blurry and seem ordinary.

[UnknownOne23]

ordinary? alright.. you give it a shot..

[Element9T8]

I have. I'm 16 years old and I shoot better than this.

[UnknownOne23]

thats just vain.. age has nothing to do with it.

so c'mon.. show me your great work then ~ cant just say whatever you want without evidence.

Message me a link or something, anything.

[Element9T8]

I don't have any links, I just have a folder with my work in it and I don't want to just send someone my pictures where they can copy them because I don't have my name on them.

[UnknownOne23]

lame.. well, how about put your name on them? a simple water mark will do.

If you aren't willing to back your word up, I can only assume the obvious.

[photos33]

amazing job thank you for the creativity

[localhost123]

Hideous. This is not photography. Learn to use a camera. And buy some Lee filters.

These images are NOT what a human eye would have seen. Totally false.

[Bobulator999]

stop being such a cunt and get over it. this is art and you should appreciate that.

[localhost123]

Hmm...which one of us is being "a cunt" I wonder? If it's art then I am allowed to have an opinion and dislike it I think. But then, the 'exhibit' is entitled "Beautiful Photography", not "Beautiful Art". If it's art then we'll have to agree to differ in our tastes. If it's photography then my opinion is that it is technically appalling, and retain my view that it is substitute for poor camera skills.

So there.

[UnknownOne23]

sorry mate, you seem to be the one at wrong here.

It doesn't matter if it doesn't look like the subject would to a naked eye, photographs would never be able to capture that anyway.

Photographs are not meant for mere recording, but also expressing.

Its not wrong for you to have an opinion, but it is wrong to criticize on such an aggressive level, which makes you somewhat ignorant.

[UnknownOne23]

Learn to get a life.

its HDR

[localhost123]

As I've said before, if you can read carefully, the 'exhibit' is entitled "Beautiful Photography", not "Beautiful Art". It isn't photography, it's HDR manipulation. If you knew anything about using a camera you'd understand the difference.

You love it, I hate it. Let's just leave it at that shall we?

[UnknownOne23]

photo manipulation.. so what is photography to you then? Polaroids?

so are you saying that you have never once tweaked an image in any software? that you print direct from camera? If you do, then yes, you are a god then, but I doubt it.

even in darkroom development, tweaks are made to produce better and more effective photographs, HDR is no different

[localhost123]

Jeez. This is my last post; I can't be bothered any more. I presume you know what HDR stands for? Yes I do 'digital darkroom' stuff. But full HDR (as here) takes multiple images (usually min 7) which combined far exceeds the optical latitude of film, digital sensor or human retina. Call it photography if you want, I don't care. I prefer a spot reading off a mid-tone, a grad filter to balance the exposure and minor curves/levels work. Dodge & burn in mono too. But not the Technicolour nightmare.

[UnknownOne23]

nice. wrong, and wrong again.

minimum 3 images. get your facts right.

use fancy words all you want, you still seem stupid.

just cos you dont like the "technicolour nightmare" haha! get over yourself

[endocondor]

You can even do it with 2 photos.

[rickarr]

yes HDR

[J0Boa]

what is the music called? and how many images do you tipically combine into one ? 10x

[atrc10]

three. one under exposed, one normal exposure, and one over exposed. typically -2,0,+2 (but it depends on your subject matter and lighting)

[newgeo21]

high dinamic rangue

alto rango dinámico

[linpoyu0415]

What a nice music..Anybody can tell me the music name?

[janjoshuaray]

hdr?

[jkharris07]

The title says it all.. Beautiful.

[samsiteone]

Beautiful,

should post in Flickr, if you don't already.