Added: 2 years ago
From: foxprovidence
Views: 5,364
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • go natalie!

    russell is just a dick

  • I wanna shove all the bitter juries of survivor into a room and watch Bruce Boudreau's of a team feeling sorry themselves. The juries are often composed of a bunch of primadonnas who feel sorry for themselves for not winning the game. If they are so down about losing, they should outwork and outplay everyone. It's a game. Quit taking stuff personal. And remember nobody wants someone who feels sorry for themselves.

  • @ButlerLewis Like it or not, juries are entitled to vote ANY WAY THEY GODDAMN WANT. That's how the game is.

    If the player was able to win over the jury despite what issues they may have against them, then they've won.

    While nobody wants someone who feels sorry for themselves, they also never want someone who calls foul for a clueless twat especially after a couple of seasons have passed.

    But if it makes you sleep well at night, keep on drinking that Kool-Aid of delusions until you drown.

  • @jpad319 Sue Hawk says hi.

  • @ButlerLewis Oh yeah. It's funny people say Russell Hantz was so mean and nasty when people who comment about him are probably just as mean and nasty, if not nastier. I mean seriously, you want me to drown. Your a mean person.

  • @jpad319 KOOL AID AGAIN OMG STFU U IDIOT!

  • Mick and Natalie both played the EXACT SAME game, no different at all, and yet she gets most of the votes, and Mick doesn't get shit? HAHA, what a load of crap, Survivor has turned into such trash with the jury.

  • @IceYourPimpHand Mick was entitled. And Survivor ALWAYS voted for the person they liked the best. ALWAYS. It's just the better strategists that know how to appeal to the jury.

  • @TheLaddysaur Russell made pretty much every strategic move in the game, without him, they wouldn't had won their only immunity challenge, they wouldn't had been able to take down galu, and if they didn't, they wouldn't had been able to take out Brett at the final challenge, so he HAD to play like he did.

  • @IceYourPimpHand It wasn't how he played conceptually, I have no issue with deceit. He played in a way that pretty much made it his allies' game to lose. He made some good moves, but he had a slew of bad moves (i.e. not getting rid of Natalie, wearing the immunity idol around his neck). He was a prick, too. A key element EVERY winner had is they were generally pleasant to the jurors. Russell actively failed to do that. Ignoring a key component of the game is not good gameplay.

  • no russel makes fun of the people he votes off to their faces and comes up with extremely elaborate lies that are often times pointless that he doesnt even need to tell, even if he has the numbers, and he does the exact same thing TWICE in a row

  • Hahah Russell looks PISSED

  • Ok look guys. Just because Russell made a couple mistakes in his social game doesnt make Natalie the better player. Natalie did nothing all game. She is undeserving. Natalie won by defaut because Russell could not win the votes so they had to go to Natalie.

  • @Josh54152 "Survivor Crowns a Winner, Offending Many Who Do Not Understand Survivor"

    Google it, read it and weep. No more, no less.

  • this interview took place after they filmed heroes vs villains, he was so skinny after HvsV, hes fatter! lol! russel though would probably be the most memerable person in survivor. when people think of survivor, they would probably automatically think russel

  • "...they would still vote how their supposed to vote."

    this is where Russell doesn't understand the game Survivor. the jury isn't 'supposed' to vote any certain way.... the jury makes their own criteria and how you have to adapt to it. adapt = survival = Survivor, c'mon Russell get with the program

  • typical they vote for the pretty blond instead of who deserves it..... wrong mentally by the weak minded jury

  • they voted for the pretty " good girl " instead of who deserved it.... its typical bull####

  • Yeah, a bitter jury caused Russell's downfall, but he's the one who made them bitter.

  • He only backstabbed 2 people: Shambo and John, and who voted Russell? Shambo and John! And they were also the biggest idiotic jurors.

  • shamabo and john were idiotic jurors assshole

  • @Fuliginosus And ironic enough, this "bitter" jury treated him delicately.

    Watch out for the next jury though. Full of hardened street thugs, these guys are not gonna have any patience for f*ckery pulled on them. You'll see the most vicious jury ever in Survivor history.

  • heroes vs villains?

  • who? jt, coach, courtney, amanda canidce, colby ru[ert who says bad stuff?jerri

  • For what it's worth, bitterness is a given in most juries.

    While he's been pretty well behaved so far, one look at the James / Stephenie debacle and the James / Randy whitewash should be enough to convince any savvy viewer just how bad it's going to get.

  • @Fuliginosus to keep his head above water, all he did was vote them out because they were all after him, he played a game, and in order for him to get to the end, he had to get rid of galu against the odds, he never did anything that was uncalled for, they're angry because he bet them, THATS bitter, he never burnt their socks or get rid of their water, he just kept his head above water.

  • he wil probably be in heroes vs villians so we will be seeing him again :)

  • Unfortunately

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more