Eugenics is a primitive "third party" view of other people, who can tell the value of another persons life? Why should other people determine who is or isnt ok to live or be part of society? Eugenic is basically viewing , you as a domestic Cow in a herd and if you are not "tidy" you will be got rid of.
Narcissism is a mental illness sweeping the West currently , if you have a corporate job a credit card and a suit, and you smile and are appropriately servile, you have all the answers!!
Eugenics are the answer to the problems of the world today. Spacs,mongs etc should not be allowed to live. If any bleeding heart liberals disagree enough then they should be allowed to keep them as pets.Neutered obviously. As long as they are no burden on society.
can someone please tell me who decided to present this video with that MONOTONE voice!!!!!! Come on! Changing picture after picture does not interest me in the least bit.
Eugenics will never work. You can stop defective genes from effecting the next generation with sterilization but the main unpreventable problem will still occur. there is no way to stop spontaneous mutations. Its spontaneous mutations that cause defective genes in healthy gene pools.
Baby-killing is the lynch pin upon which our grand ol' Republic hinges. Let's not interrupt the New World Order as soon we'll be able to visit Mexico without leaving Fla. Once I return fr. Wal-Mart things'll be altogether Sears-like. The primary source of pigs is bacon. The city of pigs is Chicago whereat Oprah & Gayle debauch. It is quite fitting that they should do so @ this time. Weekends were made for American beer-lovers. Their watered-down beverage means enormous profits to the breweries.
@TheBadBandana POSITIVE Eugenics are alright. Where the "fit" are encouraged to breed and the "unfit" are allowed to do as they please with themselves.
The point here is, that negative eugenics, when enforced means someone else has control over ourselves, our bodies, and our freedom to do as we please.
If someone chooses to not have children, that is their choice, be their reason whatever it is. That is still positive eugenics. If society chooses who gets to breed, that is when hell happens.
After a frustrating meeting to get the school to comply with programs available for students with learning dissabilities- my sister over heard the school principle whisper to another staff member in the hall way that my nephew should just be euthanized. She never confronted him and it makes me livid that monsters like that go on running schools in virtual anonymity- san antonio,TX: Bill Gate's Academy of Science and Technology The principle ,an Englishman: Rufus Samkin
@bluedebi My nephew is autistic, and we've thus far managed to protect him from prejudice.
I've worked at schools with special needs children, and what I notice that Neurotypicals have difficulty considering especially Autistic children even human.
I don't have trouble siding more often with the kids, as I went on for 26 years of my life with an undiagnosed autism spectrum disorder hampering me.
By the eugenics definition, I am "unfit", though my IQ measures in the best 1% of the population. :(
eugenics isn't the base of racism. they're completely different things. besides do you want our descendants even your grandkids to have bad disease causing genes? i dont think so.
Those who think the government is spineless, think again. Health Care Reform is all about Eugenics BUT with a twist. They will run your DNA. If you have bad genes, diseases in your genome or will cost the system, white, black or otherwise, you will be eliminated. Simply google personal health care initiative and read the government's website. You will be unfit if your genes are unfit.
Reading these posts makes me want to puke. And for those of you who think Eugenics is a science, it is not. Darwin recanted all he theorized but in the name of sickness and evil, hatred took up his cause and distorted his wrong interpretation of nature.
As our society goes down the toilet, Eugenics is the only long term answer to societal improvement. Its a ugly truth that so many try to ignore. --especially our spineless government
based on your post and your inability to sufficiently grasp the english language, you would be near the top of many lists for sterilization and extermination..... Do you have a living will?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Machines have allowed an un-natural fossil-fuel based explosion in human numbers.
It's common sense that for a sustainable future we should only allow the top 1/3rd to continue reproducing.
Maybe the guidestones are right and restricting breeding to the top 10% would be better, thats certainly the impression I get looking around, through the media etc.
This will avert malthusian catastrophe.
Energy should go into making better machines, not over-producing mediocre humans.
Lol, this is a joke. If these people say that people should be killed for traits they have then I have to say they fall into that group. Being able to kill someone because they are a retard, without blinking an eye, is a trait I don't think humans should have. Therefore, I say we start eugenizing those people. Give me all the retards and all the weak. I'll take them in.
I support eugenics as the great jacques cousteau said, ''In order to stabalise world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say but its just as bad not to say it''.
To stoned slacker: you know many people die from various causes each day-I don't have the stats, but death abounds and is ever present. This idea of eliminating human being's is a treacherous slippery slope-the question of WHO are the one's to be eliminated and by WHO with WHAT means? To me I can't think the thought of destroying humanity, this just isn't even an argueable concept. People need to remember that there's many things in this world that are unknowable to us at this point and maybe...
at any point in our present reality. We have no idea what or where seeds of greatness may come from or from whom. We have no idea if there will be a pandemic either natural or man made that could nearly wipe out the whole of humanity. We don't know if there will be people born with natural human genetics, immunities, biologies, geniuses, etc. that the human race will need now or in the future. Like everything in nature, traits take time and generation's to evolve-WHAT exactly would we be........
preventing from evolving naturally? I think when people talk eugenic's they need to consider the brevity of just what exactly they are proposing and why. Are the people who are proposing this idea suffering from some personality disorder that would even make them think this way? The very idea of sterilizing, tweaking the human genome/DNA, and even certain cases of abortions, and eliminating human being's is repugnant and points to something being erratic, imbalanced and off concerning the.......
well the thing is, prisons are more blcak than white, well in england, and the black comunities, have high amounts drug dealing, gun culture, even though guns are strictly illeagle in england, and gang warfare, and the way you speak defending black people shows how bad they really are.
im not saying chinese asian caucasian people are better citezens, im just saying they are beter quality citizens, they live in bigger houses , use their words instead of their gun, and are more intelligent, and have a job. there are some 'white natured black people, they're ok, but to look for them is looking for a needle in a haystack.
But wouldn't be easier to help the unfortunate, instead of letting them kill ourselves and each other. I'm a white guy to from northern Canada, so I'm not saying this based on bias. If governments were to actually try and help these people by getting a better education system, put more money into the hurt areas, maybe people won't find the need to sell drugs just to live. Maybe they would be more apt to get a job and stop hurting each other.
Black people cause the crime on the street? Some of it, but they are *profiled* like crazy, often unconstitutionally, so a lot of white criminals never get arrested. Plus, who does all the serial killing? White males. White collar crime? White males. This a**hole Madoff just STOLE 65 BILLION from the AMERICAN people.
(CONTINUED) The ripple effect of this type of crime indirectly creates street crime, what with loss of jobs, etc. But OK, lets say Blacks do the street crime thing. Check a white public school in the suburbs; its usually real nice, and everything, but in some classrooms in Chicago the kids sit on window ledges-NO DESKS! Lack of education=more crime.
Oh, I almost forgot. What would American and other types of popular music be like without the influence of Black musicians? Rhetorical question: IT WOULD SUCK! ADMIT IT! This is a huge cultural contribution from people that are sometimes considered lowlife, bottom feeders, etc. Things aint always what they appear to be, are they?
I agree black people are the main reason there is crime on the streets. It is simply a statistic and no amount of ignorance is going to change that fact.
Here's the thing - everyone knows that mut dogs are smarter and healthier than the pure bred pedigrees - why the hell did people think that creating pedigree humans would make them smarter. LONG LIVE MUTS! Oh yeah and LeftWIngStinks2008 your are obviously one dumb fcuk-head - please don't have children.
Apparently you don't get the idea....It's ANYONE who isn't BLONDE HAIRED, BLUE EYED CAUCASIAN...this is the government...this has not stopped. The Bush Family is part of this...every single president is part of this. It's part of the society. Bohemian Grove, Freemasons, and many other 'projects'. Wake up people. Look up 'concentration camps in America' and 'NAFTA Superhighway" on this site. We're all headed for a superhell on earth.
Classic pyramid power struggle, elite vs middle vs masses.
The elite remain in power by manipulating the masses to undermine the middle lest they become a threat.
Personally i'd rather comit "genetic suicide" than provide an elite with more cattle.
I actually beleive there is already genetic divergance leaders & led.. eugenic elite & dysgenic masses - many Religions/Cultures have various ways of acheiving this... it's been going on for 1000's of years.
Any time humainity tries to play God we end up acting more like the Devil. The first historical sign of true Humanity is a healed broken leg bone from the stone Age. They had to nurse that person back to health. Compassion.
In our pop-cultured and dollar driven society I can see it now: any practice of eugenics, no matter how well written & sincere the laws controlling them; being subverted toward the acquisition of Designer Babies; what with the obsession; in American society anyway; toward looks; demonstrated by the astronomical sums paid today for plastic surgery.
Put humans in a situation where all their material needs are catered for, they start to establish the pyramid .. fighting to establish superiority, and victimizing the weak.. for FUN :(
It seems to me that for civilization to survive, human nature must be manipulated & controlled.
I think there should be a test to determine if you have enough mental prowess and common sense to reproduce and raise a child. One has to go thru so many flaming hoops if they want to adopt or become a foster parent, yet anyone can just have a kid. What is wrong with this picture?
Heres some more population control for you. HIV does not cause AIDS. They use extremely toxic AZT, which is known as a DNA chain terminator to kill people in Africa and the rest of the world.
10 Scientific Reasons Why HIV Cannot Cause AIDS
healtoronto. com /10reasons. html
Search for "Deconstructing The Myth Of AIDS" or "HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud?" on Google Video
Google reviewingaids and click on the first result.
i'm convinced we could evolve while keeping population stable via eugenics. Maybe we could also reduce inequality too by increasing average genetic quality.
A democratic peer voting system could ensure everyone has a say in what traits are preserved. (IQ,EQ,athletisism,beauty etc)
It's the humane alternative to War, Crime, Starvation etc.
It's also true that eugenics is all around us. Nature uses eugenics to strengthen living organism through natural selection. Clearly, natural selection used by nature, as well as artificial selection used by farmers has changed the innate behavior of living populations. So there's no doubt that human eugenics would work, eugenics has already been working for millions of years in nature.
This media like many attacks eugenics based on poor implementations and false claims. First off it's proven that genetics affects behavior and that 80% of behavior is nature. Eugenics can work it just hasn't been given a real chance. The Nazis wanted a breeding program to recreate the "arayan race" who they believed were "god men", that isn't real eugenics. By the logic of this fool in the video justice is bad because an innocent person was convicted,the implementation of justice was bad
@dreicemoney how should we implement eugenics without undesirable sideeffects, abuse and distortion like nazism then..? even before the rise of nazism leading scientists such as thomas huxley and even darwin himself falsified and rejcted eugenics. not only on moral ground but on the hypothesis that it wouldnt work...
@hailshonny you answered your own question. Society learns from poorer implementations of eugenics, justice, etc. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. You obviously know nothing about natural selection or evolution. You claim "it wouldn't work" but it's already been proven to work in other species time and time again. Eugenics is simply harnessing the power of natural selection and evolution both of which work.
@dreicemoney basically you cannot play god. humans try to do it all the time. eugenics, and the whole idea is evil. this is not a case of comunism, where true communism could work if we just learn how to work it... nooo this is not the same thing you ignorant fool. trying to create the perfect race, and or reduce the population of a certain part of the globe based on a few peoples perception of "non fuctioning societaty" is evil no matter what.
When I really started paying attention to eugenics..I can not help but see the ultimate sinisterness of it.Who judges other human beings? They're value?They're worth? Eugenics? No thanks.
Should we hv the right 2 decide who gets 2 breed? Is this right? I don't think so. I know of folks who had rotten parents but they change or are better people. Some of it thru religion or exposure to better people.
Be asured,eugenics is alive and well in the world...that enough should scare the hell out of you.What makes you think you would be deemed an "appropriate" human being under eugenics standards?
"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it. — Margaret Sanger: "Women and the New Race" (Eugenics Publications Co., 1920, 1923)
I read, during an interview g.h.w.bush mentioned that daddy prescott bush had worked diligently on eugenics as well. I recall reading that in Salem, NC, the school district tested kids, all kids with IQ below 70 were scheduled for sterilazation. current Bush state of union address in 2004 he spoke of the no child left behind, and said he wants to test all children to see what level they are on? hmmm, Still in place toda pre-natel testing, dna research etc.Peace.
Yes,and g.h.w.bush chose a wife of a satan worshipper.(TRUE)So,there is real evidence that he married barbara because she came from a satanist family.Her father was called,'the most evil man in the world'.Check it out:Aleister Crowly.(or Crowley)
churchill,h.g.wells,roosevelt and many more very famous people backed this nonsense,and of course it ended up with 6 million jews dying by nazi hands.h.g wells actually stated that jews where "swarms of inferior citizens"
Eugenics is the survival of the fittest, without social conscience. And, taking Darwinian Evolution as a given, what`s wrong with this ? Great men like J. Bronowski ( ironically ) firmly defended the seemless "Assent" from amoeba to Man - in Darwinian terms ! Please, someone tell me I`m wrong.
The main difference between Darwinian Evolution and Eugenics is one of intervention. Eugenics not only observes how NATURAL selection changes a species, it advocates ARTIFICIAL selection. That's where it gets its bad name from - that a society can rule who is allowed to breed or not, and it is a very bad name...
Thanks for that,edmoriarty. I understand what you`re saying. But let me put my point another way : Cultural evolution is seen by many great scientific thinkers as a seemless continuity with biological evolution. And, as we know, one of the things which cultural evolution has thrown our way is the belief that some `traits` are less desirable than others . What I`m trying to say is, what you would call "Artificial," I might call a simple and seemless continuity with CD`s natural selection.
Hi Morgandrim, thanks for yours! With respect, if Eugenics and all its attendant evils is down to cultural evolution, maybe the prevailing moral climate which finds it abhorrent, is just the next step in that evolution - maybe I'm more evolved than you are!
Maye be so, edmoriarty, maybe so ! I wish I could honestly see the great leap between natural evolution and that evolution artificially engineered by our own kind. It`s an interesting debate.
Actually, morgandrim, you've made me realise that 'artificial' evolution may well be part evolution itself - after all artificial evolution is a product of the human mind/will, itself a product of evolution. Eugenics might be a 'logical' extension of Darwinism, but it still stinks, and trust me:there's a direct line from Galton to the Nazis via the Americans. I know you didn't mean wrong as in morally wrong, but i just can't get morals out of my head with Eugenics, Racial Hygiene and genocide...
I think we have - more or less - a consensus ad idem, edmoriarty. I have to confess I am no expert in the social and moral ( and political ) history of Europe during the last 150 years. But what you say is most interesting : "...but it still stinks." ( ie Galtonism ). Yes it does. But I think there has to be a case for examining why it stinks. Particularly here and now, in our country today.
I have my doubts that you agree that Eugenics is a logical extesion...cont..
The same people that polluted the world and exported war everywhere, now want to save it from global warming and overpopulation....lol. Give me a break. They want to use eugenics and the environment to continue conquering other peoples. "BETTER FOR ALL THE WORLD?" or BETTER FOR THEIR VISION OF WHAT THE WORLD SHOULD BE?
Some of the stuff that happened is nasty but that does not invalidate eugenics. Intelligent parents have intelligent kids, what's there to argue about?
tlewizan: Are u out of your mind? What are you talking about? Nobody has the right to decide such a thing about you!!! Would you like to be sterilized by your goverment? nobody has the right to decide obuot somebody elses life! You are thinking the same way nazis did!!!!
Poor jews they had to suffer. But I do believe Eugenics is the key to success in the future. We must sterilize the poor populations they can't help themselves but breed to much. It's better to be sterilized than to be killed I think all would agree on this.
Yay! And then we can all flop to the floor, spin around in a circle and drool. By "the best types", this presumably includes the best educated? And people who don't maintian untenable and discredited theories? You maybe be right re. "fear" though.
indeed. even the genomes of flies and humans are 75% identical. i think that most of the genome is just a basis on with the other code can operate. like in the java programming language there are a few megabytes of basic classes and a usual java program has just around 100 kB.
who dosen't have someone in their family that's an idiot, crazy, a drug adict, in poverty or from an impovrished situation, ugly, socially deviant..... gues we all need to be steralized.
First of all scientists can't 'prove' anything by their own admission. Secondly...some articles from scholarly journals would back up your claim a bit more.
Agreed that has never been proven and what you call fact are written by the same people that say there are too many of you and you are only aloud to have 1-2 children at same time they have 5-10 children. So if u wanna believe this crap go ahead but STAY AWAY FROM MY CHILD!
They did a fine job then with Dobermann dogs. Poor creatures run amok when their brains kick their skull bones. Besides, what are our leaders but mental degenerates? Ah, well
PNAC contains ambivalent language toward bioterrorism and genetic warfare: "New methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- will be more widely available ... combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool"
I wonder what plans there are to implement eugenics today. I heard there are viruses out there that target specific races. The anthrax scares during 9/11 might have been a test of how hard it is to distribute such a weapon.
aids is considered a race specific weapon. certain people say it is more likely for a black person to get it in intercourse with an infected person than it is for a white person.
"certain people" say the Holocaust never happened. "certain people" say that God created the world in 6 days, and that his first created humans didn't become aware of their genitals until Eve was tricked into eating a piece of fruit by a talking snake. What's more likely is that black people - particularly Africans - tend to be less well educated re. STDs primarily because they tend to be poor. If you don't use contraception you contract Aids more easily. But you may prefer to remain bigoted.
you do not believe that things liek race specific bioweapons exist, do you? please tell me two things: do you think that bio weapons exist? do you think that there are viruses that have different effects in different ethnic groups.
I`m jumping in on this conversation without reading much of the debate, 1schwererziehbar1, but what you say may be interesting. There may be race specific bioweapons, to my mind. there are certain types of anaemias present - particularly in W. Africa - that confer some resistance to malaria. This could be exploited.
nazi pursuit of jewish elimination was due to the perception of jewish people as both alien and a competitive threat. The process was sold under the propaganda of claim of inferiority. these are the examples of eugenics practices maliciously applied. Eugenics is no more invalidated by its misuse than the field of brain surgery by the ugly practice of frontal lobotomies.
Claiming that eugenics is wrong because hitler beleived in it is like claiming that gravity is wrong because hitler beleived in it. Before WWII most scientists beleievd in Eugenics and there is plenty of proof today to show that it is a valid science. Also there a practical applications of eugenics that could be apllied to todays society without infringing on basic human rights.
exactly, most of the dangers of Eugenics come from what is determined to be "inferior" traits. It this basic foundation of Eugenics that can be very dangerous. What do we define as benifitial and detrimental?
I wonder if Eugenics has a real basis and it is the Bush family and some Royal families we should prevent from reproducing for the sake of the planet ...
It's is funny when we see the history run. today, everyone knows USA by their Black artists and athletes. Most of america's culture is under Black influences.
If radical environmentalists were to invent a disease to bring human populations back to sanity, it would probably be something like AIDS -- Earth First! Newsletter
The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans. -- Dr. Reed F. Noss, The Wildlands Project
If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels. -- Prince Phillip, World Wildlife Fund
I'm American and live in Germany for nearly 10 years. Through documentaries on German TV about the Nazis and their work I have learned that when they did sterilize or the person died /killed intentionally they sent a letter informing family of the death and requiring a burial fee! The families thought that the person was safe and didn't realize they were being tortured.
These are videos I made a year ago in two days each...if you can find your way to my channel you can watch two full length films that are polished. click on PLAY LIST, clickMONARCH (I&II), click PLAY ALL VIDEOS and the segments will play one after the other. I agree that this work leaves something to be desires.
There was a man who left his life in Germany to avoid being drafted to the Nazi Army, he spent all his money to come to America. He married a woman who did the same thing. In America they were treated cruelly because they spoke only German, and they were experimented on for "Depression!" The American govt experimented on them. Govt is sometimes too strong...
Ask yourself who knows your needs better; yourself or a government? Would you trust them to pick your companion and mother or father of your children? Or do you trust your own ability to pick a mate? Human judgment is flawed so it is surely preferable that each person make the choice for themselves, rather than a few people choosing for the rest of us.
So when breeding works well we are like dogs but when it doesn't work then we are better than dogs? that is interesting. Okay European royalty, some times you got an Elizebeth or a Cathrine the great but alot of the time you just got usless fops who spent their fortunes away. You also had the introduction of hemophilia through Cathrines line; so restricted breeding has lead to dead ends.
Breeders rarely create the best animals only fashionable animals. Each pure breed suffers from health or temperment problems as a result of breeding exclusivly for certain traits with in a small gene pool. For example the lap dogs of the rich were bred to be cute but they are certainly not the "best" possible dog. Great Danes are bread to be big, but they suffer from deafness and poor metabolism.
fundamentalist christians don't like it because it has different ideas about jesus. i as a moderate christian like it because getting to know other ideas is good for intelligent beings.
Mars, After 2001,the fascist members called me Jew.From then on they have controlled and harmed my female physiology,they threated that can not bear children.
They are Nazis. The Eugenics Movement begins in the UK and US.Holocaust？ I like eugenics,but I against holocaust.
Gensis 3:15(King James Version) And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.... start loading up these comments with as many variation of this passage as you can find & make the computer reach a clear translation global warming & abstinance.... think & find all the texts...its a computer... human are the ones committing the act
Positive eugenics drives th stem cell research market in the supply & demand market relations... Negative eugenics is self-governance (abstinence) based on legal & moral conscience ..adversely(see Thalidomide)...Racism · Sexism · Ageism · Religious intolerance · Xenophobia (general forms)
It's a shame that the US supported the Soviets, and not the Germans. Eventually the totalitarian part of NSDAP would have deteriorated, like it did in the USSR, but the world would've been a cleaner place, and provided a better environment for the white race, unlike the world of today.
By the way, the 'Eastern Europeans' mentioned in the beginning were probably of Middle Eastern origin, namely Jewish. These fled en masse from the Russian Empire before the rest of their nation destroyed it and found the USSR.
My family is crippled by mental illness. They have children and pass on the disease and their descendents live in complete crippling poverty and hopelessness. Better not to be born at all than be born defective. But I do not agree with the methods of the Nazi's and such. It would be good policy however to reward those born with genetic disease with a sum of money, say US$5000 if they agree to sterilization than let them have children that suffer from cradle to the grave again and again.
@TheBadBandana If that was remotely possible, to remove genes of your choosing is not yet possible.
XpEAnUTBuTtERsUckSX 1 month ago
hey i was wondering where you got this film originally from?
SarizzelBoe 3 months ago
Eugenics is a primitive "third party" view of other people, who can tell the value of another persons life? Why should other people determine who is or isnt ok to live or be part of society? Eugenic is basically viewing , you as a domestic Cow in a herd and if you are not "tidy" you will be got rid of.
Narcissism is a mental illness sweeping the West currently , if you have a corporate job a credit card and a suit, and you smile and are appropriately servile, you have all the answers!!
Marcus538 6 months ago
Sure you can try to manipulate genes but Nature and nurture will prevail. Sin is in our DNA, so try to get sin out of it, I dare you to try!!
manifestdestany3 1 year ago 2
Eugenics are the answer to the problems of the world today. Spacs,mongs etc should not be allowed to live. If any bleeding heart liberals disagree enough then they should be allowed to keep them as pets.Neutered obviously. As long as they are no burden on society.
aranterranting 1 year ago
can someone please tell me who decided to present this video with that MONOTONE voice!!!!!! Come on! Changing picture after picture does not interest me in the least bit.
Rebelchikaa 1 year ago
Very low volume and im already on the headset
Burnedice 1 year ago
Eugenics will never work. You can stop defective genes from effecting the next generation with sterilization but the main unpreventable problem will still occur. there is no way to stop spontaneous mutations. Its spontaneous mutations that cause defective genes in healthy gene pools.
cerberus1874 1 year ago
@TheBadBandana I am sure you have some incriminating genes, so I say lead by example.
Flatheadhomebrewer 1 year ago
Baby-killing is the lynch pin upon which our grand ol' Republic hinges. Let's not interrupt the New World Order as soon we'll be able to visit Mexico without leaving Fla. Once I return fr. Wal-Mart things'll be altogether Sears-like. The primary source of pigs is bacon. The city of pigs is Chicago whereat Oprah & Gayle debauch. It is quite fitting that they should do so @ this time. Weekends were made for American beer-lovers. Their watered-down beverage means enormous profits to the breweries.
ThePregnancySlaves 2 years ago
@TheBadBandana POSITIVE Eugenics are alright. Where the "fit" are encouraged to breed and the "unfit" are allowed to do as they please with themselves.
The point here is, that negative eugenics, when enforced means someone else has control over ourselves, our bodies, and our freedom to do as we please.
If someone chooses to not have children, that is their choice, be their reason whatever it is. That is still positive eugenics. If society chooses who gets to breed, that is when hell happens.
tammipuu 2 years ago
After a frustrating meeting to get the school to comply with programs available for students with learning dissabilities- my sister over heard the school principle whisper to another staff member in the hall way that my nephew should just be euthanized. She never confronted him and it makes me livid that monsters like that go on running schools in virtual anonymity- san antonio,TX: Bill Gate's Academy of Science and Technology The principle ,an Englishman: Rufus Samkin
bluedebi 2 years ago 2
@bluedebi My nephew is autistic, and we've thus far managed to protect him from prejudice.
I've worked at schools with special needs children, and what I notice that Neurotypicals have difficulty considering especially Autistic children even human.
I don't have trouble siding more often with the kids, as I went on for 26 years of my life with an undiagnosed autism spectrum disorder hampering me.
By the eugenics definition, I am "unfit", though my IQ measures in the best 1% of the population. :(
tammipuu 2 years ago
eugenics isn't the base of racism. they're completely different things. besides do you want our descendants even your grandkids to have bad disease causing genes? i dont think so.
Ryan12592 2 years ago
Those who think the government is spineless, think again. Health Care Reform is all about Eugenics BUT with a twist. They will run your DNA. If you have bad genes, diseases in your genome or will cost the system, white, black or otherwise, you will be eliminated. Simply google personal health care initiative and read the government's website. You will be unfit if your genes are unfit.
ddsharper 2 years ago
Reading these posts makes me want to puke. And for those of you who think Eugenics is a science, it is not. Darwin recanted all he theorized but in the name of sickness and evil, hatred took up his cause and distorted his wrong interpretation of nature.
ddsharper 2 years ago
As our society goes down the toilet, Eugenics is the only long term answer to societal improvement. Its a ugly truth that so many try to ignore. --especially our spineless government
FloridaRaider 2 years ago 2
Yeah sure, let's bread the retards, the stupid and the failures because after all we are all equals.
And we should also encourage race mixing so that differences between races will disappear so we gonna be more "equal".
Hilsnimi 2 years ago
based on your post and your inability to sufficiently grasp the english language, you would be near the top of many lists for sterilization and extermination..... Do you have a living will?
edwardj0206 2 years ago
sciEnce is NOT THE EVIL
whats evil are the people that use the power of science for bad things
REGWHY 2 years ago 2
ha end of ww2 approx half million german women had babies from black g.i`s and mongol russian soldiers
sirpico123 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you a Zionist liar?
Why do you have to mixed documented truth with Zionist lies of the holocaust Gas Chambers & other lies?
The good thing is that the Zionist propaganda is losing ground even as they theaten people's freedom of speech with jail time.
Please google. Nazi Shrunken heads then go on to look at the other documentaries by that gentleman has made. Like One third of the holocaust.
They are well documented.
You are a Liar sir.!!
SolidSWARM 2 years ago
Are you a Zionist liar?
Why do you have to mixed documented truth with Zionist lies of the holocaust Gas Chambers & other lies?
The good thing is that the Zionist propaganda is losing ground even as they theaten people's freedom of speech with jail time.
Please google. Nazi Shrunken heads then go on to look at the other documentaries by that gentleman has made. Like One third of the holocaust.
They are well documented.
You are a Liar sir.!!
SolidSWARM 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Machines have allowed an un-natural fossil-fuel based explosion in human numbers.
It's common sense that for a sustainable future we should only allow the top 1/3rd to continue reproducing.
Maybe the guidestones are right and restricting breeding to the top 10% would be better, thats certainly the impression I get looking around, through the media etc.
This will avert malthusian catastrophe.
Energy should go into making better machines, not over-producing mediocre humans.
walter0bz 2 years ago
define "top 1/3" and "top 10%" please
TheKuffarKid 2 years ago
Lol, this is a joke. If these people say that people should be killed for traits they have then I have to say they fall into that group. Being able to kill someone because they are a retard, without blinking an eye, is a trait I don't think humans should have. Therefore, I say we start eugenizing those people. Give me all the retards and all the weak. I'll take them in.
gwapindust 2 years ago
yeah,
these idiots let their emotions get in the way of the truth, so instead of actually thinking about it for a second, they vote down these comments.
TheStonedSlackerNZ 2 years ago
I support eugenics as the great jacques cousteau said, ''In order to stabalise world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say but its just as bad not to say it''.
TheStonedSlackerNZ 2 years ago
To stoned slacker: you know many people die from various causes each day-I don't have the stats, but death abounds and is ever present. This idea of eliminating human being's is a treacherous slippery slope-the question of WHO are the one's to be eliminated and by WHO with WHAT means? To me I can't think the thought of destroying humanity, this just isn't even an argueable concept. People need to remember that there's many things in this world that are unknowable to us at this point and maybe...
wat700son 2 years ago
at any point in our present reality. We have no idea what or where seeds of greatness may come from or from whom. We have no idea if there will be a pandemic either natural or man made that could nearly wipe out the whole of humanity. We don't know if there will be people born with natural human genetics, immunities, biologies, geniuses, etc. that the human race will need now or in the future. Like everything in nature, traits take time and generation's to evolve-WHAT exactly would we be........
wat700son 2 years ago
preventing from evolving naturally? I think when people talk eugenic's they need to consider the brevity of just what exactly they are proposing and why. Are the people who are proposing this idea suffering from some personality disorder that would even make them think this way? The very idea of sterilizing, tweaking the human genome/DNA, and even certain cases of abortions, and eliminating human being's is repugnant and points to something being erratic, imbalanced and off concerning the.......
wat700son 2 years ago
one's proposing such a twisted barbaric misguided illusion and not the one's being considered for elimination.
wat700son 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i agree black people are the main reason there is crime on the streets.
sauldavidwilliams 3 years ago
Comment removed
TheGreatFatMan2007 3 years ago
Fuck you, you racist piece of shit. If you incite hatred onto others, of course they will retaliate back, you dumb fuck.
I won't feel sorry at all if they target you, or people you love. For all I am concerned, you deserve it, you piece of scum shit.
We all need to understand we are all in this together, and those who reject that, cause problems and don't deserve to breathe.
TheGreatFatMan2007 3 years ago
well the thing is, prisons are more blcak than white, well in england, and the black comunities, have high amounts drug dealing, gun culture, even though guns are strictly illeagle in england, and gang warfare, and the way you speak defending black people shows how bad they really are.
sauldavidwilliams 3 years ago 2
im not saying chinese asian caucasian people are better citezens, im just saying they are beter quality citizens, they live in bigger houses , use their words instead of their gun, and are more intelligent, and have a job. there are some 'white natured black people, they're ok, but to look for them is looking for a needle in a haystack.
sauldavidwilliams 3 years ago
But wouldn't be easier to help the unfortunate, instead of letting them kill ourselves and each other. I'm a white guy to from northern Canada, so I'm not saying this based on bias. If governments were to actually try and help these people by getting a better education system, put more money into the hurt areas, maybe people won't find the need to sell drugs just to live. Maybe they would be more apt to get a job and stop hurting each other.
TheGreatFatMan2007 3 years ago
Black people cause the crime on the street? Some of it, but they are *profiled* like crazy, often unconstitutionally, so a lot of white criminals never get arrested. Plus, who does all the serial killing? White males. White collar crime? White males. This a**hole Madoff just STOLE 65 BILLION from the AMERICAN people.
filthyphillyboy 3 years ago
(CONTINUED) The ripple effect of this type of crime indirectly creates street crime, what with loss of jobs, etc. But OK, lets say Blacks do the street crime thing. Check a white public school in the suburbs; its usually real nice, and everything, but in some classrooms in Chicago the kids sit on window ledges-NO DESKS! Lack of education=more crime.
filthyphillyboy 3 years ago
Oh, I almost forgot. What would American and other types of popular music be like without the influence of Black musicians? Rhetorical question: IT WOULD SUCK! ADMIT IT! This is a huge cultural contribution from people that are sometimes considered lowlife, bottom feeders, etc. Things aint always what they appear to be, are they?
filthyphillyboy 3 years ago
I agree black people are the main reason there is crime on the streets. It is simply a statistic and no amount of ignorance is going to change that fact.
TheStonedSlackerNZ 2 years ago
You dumb bitch.
Struckgold 3 years ago
Shut the fuck up you dumb fucker.
Struckgold 3 years ago
Spell this. YOU ARE A CUNT & I WOULD LOVE TO TAKE YOU NITO A BLACKNEIGHBOUR HOOD & LET CUT YOUR BALLS OFF AND STUFF THEM DOWN YOUR RACIST THROAT.
Struckgold 3 years ago
Here's the thing - everyone knows that mut dogs are smarter and healthier than the pure bred pedigrees - why the hell did people think that creating pedigree humans would make them smarter. LONG LIVE MUTS! Oh yeah and LeftWIngStinks2008 your are obviously one dumb fcuk-head - please don't have children.
Struckgold 3 years ago 2
Did Blacks pick on you as a child? LOL If you feel that way do something about it, don't hide behind srceen. Actions speak louder,
OBZRV82 3 years ago 2
My original comment was in response to "LeftWingStinks2008". thank you
jrlomy2k 3 years ago
Apparently you don't get the idea....It's ANYONE who isn't BLONDE HAIRED, BLUE EYED CAUCASIAN...this is the government...this has not stopped. The Bush Family is part of this...every single president is part of this. It's part of the society. Bohemian Grove, Freemasons, and many other 'projects'. Wake up people. Look up 'concentration camps in America' and 'NAFTA Superhighway" on this site. We're all headed for a superhell on earth.
jrlomy2k 3 years ago
The financial elite sees humanity as largely superflous, "useless eaters" to be duped, distracted and manipulated.
kiwidavid72 3 years ago 8
Classic pyramid power struggle, elite vs middle vs masses.
The elite remain in power by manipulating the masses to undermine the middle lest they become a threat.
Personally i'd rather comit "genetic suicide" than provide an elite with more cattle.
I actually beleive there is already genetic divergance leaders & led.. eugenic elite & dysgenic masses - many Religions/Cultures have various ways of acheiving this... it's been going on for 1000's of years.
walter0bz 3 years ago
Any time humainity tries to play God we end up acting more like the Devil. The first historical sign of true Humanity is a healed broken leg bone from the stone Age. They had to nurse that person back to health. Compassion.
donaghec 3 years ago
In our pop-cultured and dollar driven society I can see it now: any practice of eugenics, no matter how well written & sincere the laws controlling them; being subverted toward the acquisition of Designer Babies; what with the obsession; in American society anyway; toward looks; demonstrated by the astronomical sums paid today for plastic surgery.
Prohibition, anyone?
filthyphillyboy 3 years ago
contrversial i know.
Theory: civilizations are founded on religions which practiced different eugenics breeding rules for 1000s of years..
e.g. (i)christianity = only breed if you can make a lifelong comitment. (ii)Others allow polygamy to amplify sucessfull genes.
(iii)Some used the caste system to breed leaders & followers
So, to truly out-evolve religion, maybe we would need a 'child-bearing licence' designed to keep civilization stable ?
walter0bz 3 years ago
Walter0bz-I really hope you thought about that statement after clicking post comment and realized what an absolutely terrible idea it is.
bar730 3 years ago
What is the alternative?
What does nature want?
Put humans in a situation where all their material needs are catered for, they start to establish the pyramid .. fighting to establish superiority, and victimizing the weak.. for FUN :(
It seems to me that for civilization to survive, human nature must be manipulated & controlled.
walter0bz 3 years ago
I think there should be a test to determine if you have enough mental prowess and common sense to reproduce and raise a child. One has to go thru so many flaming hoops if they want to adopt or become a foster parent, yet anyone can just have a kid. What is wrong with this picture?
MrKevMan 3 years ago
Heres some more population control for you. HIV does not cause AIDS. They use extremely toxic AZT, which is known as a DNA chain terminator to kill people in Africa and the rest of the world.
10 Scientific Reasons Why HIV Cannot Cause AIDS
healtoronto. com /10reasons. html
Search for "Deconstructing The Myth Of AIDS" or "HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud?" on Google Video
Google reviewingaids and click on the first result.
"The important thing is to not stop questioning."
Albert Einstein
jackson32 3 years ago
i'm convinced we could evolve while keeping population stable via eugenics. Maybe we could also reduce inequality too by increasing average genetic quality.
A democratic peer voting system could ensure everyone has a say in what traits are preserved. (IQ,EQ,athletisism,beauty etc)
It's the humane alternative to War, Crime, Starvation etc.
Shame Hitler distorted the concept toward evil.
walter0bz 3 years ago
It's also true that eugenics is all around us. Nature uses eugenics to strengthen living organism through natural selection. Clearly, natural selection used by nature, as well as artificial selection used by farmers has changed the innate behavior of living populations. So there's no doubt that human eugenics would work, eugenics has already been working for millions of years in nature.
dreicemoney 3 years ago 3
This media like many attacks eugenics based on poor implementations and false claims. First off it's proven that genetics affects behavior and that 80% of behavior is nature. Eugenics can work it just hasn't been given a real chance. The Nazis wanted a breeding program to recreate the "arayan race" who they believed were "god men", that isn't real eugenics. By the logic of this fool in the video justice is bad because an innocent person was convicted,the implementation of justice was bad
dreicemoney 3 years ago 3
@dreicemoney how should we implement eugenics without undesirable sideeffects, abuse and distortion like nazism then..? even before the rise of nazism leading scientists such as thomas huxley and even darwin himself falsified and rejcted eugenics. not only on moral ground but on the hypothesis that it wouldnt work...
hailshonny 1 year ago
@hailshonny you answered your own question. Society learns from poorer implementations of eugenics, justice, etc. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. You obviously know nothing about natural selection or evolution. You claim "it wouldn't work" but it's already been proven to work in other species time and time again. Eugenics is simply harnessing the power of natural selection and evolution both of which work.
dreicemoney 1 year ago
@dreicemoney so then what is real eugenics and what are the positive applications?
metric09 1 year ago
@dreicemoney basically you cannot play god. humans try to do it all the time. eugenics, and the whole idea is evil. this is not a case of comunism, where true communism could work if we just learn how to work it... nooo this is not the same thing you ignorant fool. trying to create the perfect race, and or reduce the population of a certain part of the globe based on a few peoples perception of "non fuctioning societaty" is evil no matter what.
tazukii 8 months ago
@dreicemoney
Nature only affects one's personal predisposition. Much of behavior comes from cognitive thought influenced by environment and conditioning.
khanmankhan10 7 months ago
When I really started paying attention to eugenics..I can not help but see the ultimate sinisterness of it.Who judges other human beings? They're value?They're worth? Eugenics? No thanks.
FREEW0RLD2012 3 years ago
Should we hv the right 2 decide who gets 2 breed? Is this right? I don't think so. I know of folks who had rotten parents but they change or are better people. Some of it thru religion or exposure to better people.
skoolmebaby 3 years ago
No,and that is why eugenics is so vile and sinister.
FREEW0RLD2012 3 years ago
Be asured,eugenics is alive and well in the world...that enough should scare the hell out of you.What makes you think you would be deemed an "appropriate" human being under eugenics standards?
FREEW0RLD2012 3 years ago
eUGENICS OF THE PAST IS THE SAME AS EUGENICS OF TODAY.... OPEN YOUR FUCKING EYES!
epicdred 3 years ago 2
AGREED!
FREEW0RLD2012 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it. — Margaret Sanger: "Women and the New Race" (Eugenics Publications Co., 1920, 1923)
Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood
procommenter 3 years ago
I read, during an interview g.h.w.bush mentioned that daddy prescott bush had worked diligently on eugenics as well. I recall reading that in Salem, NC, the school district tested kids, all kids with IQ below 70 were scheduled for sterilazation. current Bush state of union address in 2004 he spoke of the no child left behind, and said he wants to test all children to see what level they are on? hmmm, Still in place toda pre-natel testing, dna research etc.Peace.
mindelevationgod 3 years ago
Yes,and g.h.w.bush chose a wife of a satan worshipper.(TRUE)So,there is real evidence that he married barbara because she came from a satanist family.Her father was called,'the most evil man in the world'.Check it out:Aleister Crowly.(or Crowley)
FREEW0RLD2012 3 years ago
churchill,h.g.wells,roosevelt and many more very famous people backed this nonsense,and of course it ended up with 6 million jews dying by nazi hands.h.g wells actually stated that jews where "swarms of inferior citizens"
wizardspocket 3 years ago
That`s one way of looking at it. An interesting way of looking at it. I wasn`t specifically referring to the facts you mention, but yes, why not ?
morgandrim 3 years ago
Actually I think Eugenics is here, alive and well in the world today. Even in the West. Consider this statement before replying !
morgandrim 3 years ago 3
GO HERE!! sign it, and send!
H.R. 5842: The Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act
H.R. 5843: The Personal Use Act
(dot)mpp(dot)org(slash)legislation
Fastlan3 3 years ago
why on earth can't we have MORAL eugenics, with the most messy being forced abortions, the rest to increase the birth rate of the attractive & smart.
simplybornhuman 3 years ago
cont.. extension of D. Evol, but what is it, if not ? It`s a disturbing idea, but one that needs looking at.
morgandrim 3 years ago
Eugenics is the survival of the fittest, without social conscience. And, taking Darwinian Evolution as a given, what`s wrong with this ? Great men like J. Bronowski ( ironically ) firmly defended the seemless "Assent" from amoeba to Man - in Darwinian terms ! Please, someone tell me I`m wrong.
morgandrim 3 years ago
The main difference between Darwinian Evolution and Eugenics is one of intervention. Eugenics not only observes how NATURAL selection changes a species, it advocates ARTIFICIAL selection. That's where it gets its bad name from - that a society can rule who is allowed to breed or not, and it is a very bad name...
edmoriarty 3 years ago
Thanks for that,edmoriarty. I understand what you`re saying. But let me put my point another way : Cultural evolution is seen by many great scientific thinkers as a seemless continuity with biological evolution. And, as we know, one of the things which cultural evolution has thrown our way is the belief that some `traits` are less desirable than others . What I`m trying to say is, what you would call "Artificial," I might call a simple and seemless continuity with CD`s natural selection.
morgandrim 3 years ago
Hi Morgandrim, thanks for yours! With respect, if Eugenics and all its attendant evils is down to cultural evolution, maybe the prevailing moral climate which finds it abhorrent, is just the next step in that evolution - maybe I'm more evolved than you are!
edmoriarty 3 years ago
Maye be so, edmoriarty, maybe so ! I wish I could honestly see the great leap between natural evolution and that evolution artificially engineered by our own kind. It`s an interesting debate.
morgandrim 3 years ago
Actually, morgandrim, you've made me realise that 'artificial' evolution may well be part evolution itself - after all artificial evolution is a product of the human mind/will, itself a product of evolution. Eugenics might be a 'logical' extension of Darwinism, but it still stinks, and trust me:there's a direct line from Galton to the Nazis via the Americans. I know you didn't mean wrong as in morally wrong, but i just can't get morals out of my head with Eugenics, Racial Hygiene and genocide...
edmoriarty 3 years ago
I think we have - more or less - a consensus ad idem, edmoriarty. I have to confess I am no expert in the social and moral ( and political ) history of Europe during the last 150 years. But what you say is most interesting : "...but it still stinks." ( ie Galtonism ). Yes it does. But I think there has to be a case for examining why it stinks. Particularly here and now, in our country today.
I have my doubts that you agree that Eugenics is a logical extesion...cont..
morgandrim 3 years ago
The same people that polluted the world and exported war everywhere, now want to save it from global warming and overpopulation....lol. Give me a break. They want to use eugenics and the environment to continue conquering other peoples. "BETTER FOR ALL THE WORLD?" or BETTER FOR THEIR VISION OF WHAT THE WORLD SHOULD BE?
melaninman21st 3 years ago 4
Some of the stuff that happened is nasty but that does not invalidate eugenics. Intelligent parents have intelligent kids, what's there to argue about?
4096x 3 years ago
tlewizan: Are u out of your mind? What are you talking about? Nobody has the right to decide such a thing about you!!! Would you like to be sterilized by your goverment? nobody has the right to decide obuot somebody elses life! You are thinking the same way nazis did!!!!
victorbbv 3 years ago
Poor jews they had to suffer. But I do believe Eugenics is the key to success in the future. We must sterilize the poor populations they can't help themselves but breed to much. It's better to be sterilized than to be killed I think all would agree on this.
tlewizan 3 years ago
Such as abotion today, eugenics was a left, feminist, protestant and jewish business.
daltonagre 3 years ago
If we do not re-introduce a eugenics policy into Europe, we'll end up becoming increasingly religious like the Americans or arabs.
Eugenics is not necessarily racialist. We should promote the best types within all the races for a better, healthier, more advanced future.
Opponents of eugenics are generally the weak, who behind their moral sophistry betray a fear.
PeteUtonic 3 years ago
Yay! And then we can all flop to the floor, spin around in a circle and drool. By "the best types", this presumably includes the best educated? And people who don't maintian untenable and discredited theories? You maybe be right re. "fear" though.
RHutton2710 3 years ago
indeed. even the genomes of flies and humans are 75% identical. i think that most of the genome is just a basis on with the other code can operate. like in the java programming language there are a few megabytes of basic classes and a usual java program has just around 100 kB.
1schwererziehbar1 3 years ago
who dosen't have someone in their family that's an idiot, crazy, a drug adict, in poverty or from an impovrished situation, ugly, socially deviant..... gues we all need to be steralized.
nassor02 3 years ago
There is no difference intelligence is a point of view nothing more. You are not the illusion. Peace Love and Forgiveness.
natdrip 3 years ago
I am not at all condoning forced sterilizations, I'm just saying that the genetics of intelligence have been proven, you ignorant -CENSORED-
Dwazedas 3 years ago
Proven? Not by scientists.
First of all scientists can't 'prove' anything by their own admission. Secondly...some articles from scholarly journals would back up your claim a bit more.
RebelWithoutASauce 3 years ago
"scientists can't 'prove' anything by their own admission". Aye - they prefer to work with evidence, rather than their own self-opinion.
RHutton2710 3 years ago
Fact the ancestors of all human beings came out of Africa, there is no such thing as 'Nordic blood'.
yourcamden 3 years ago
Fact: That has not been proven.
Dwazedas 3 years ago
Agreed that has never been proven and what you call fact are written by the same people that say there are too many of you and you are only aloud to have 1-2 children at same time they have 5-10 children. So if u wanna believe this crap go ahead but STAY AWAY FROM MY CHILD!
BusyTurkey 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Eugenics is a bona fide science, and for your information, it is on the rise again.
Dwazedas 3 years ago
Evidence please to support your theory that 'Eugenics is a bona fide science'?
yourcamden 3 years ago
Just read the journals.
Dwazedas 3 years ago
Whose journals? Titles, dates, publishers and issue numbers please.
yourcamden 3 years ago
speak up man your audio is inaudible, fucking degenerate!
jwallbanger 4 years ago
jwallbanger: Yes there is a sound problem, but no need to mock him like that. What do you think you are, a super-human?
Him I would like to hear, you I wouldn't.
Aurinkohirvi 4 years ago
then stop reading my posts, dumbass!
mockery is far more important than genetics.
it's science....(_!_)
jwallbanger 4 years ago
They did a fine job then with Dobermann dogs. Poor creatures run amok when their brains kick their skull bones. Besides, what are our leaders but mental degenerates? Ah, well
jupiterjjrm 4 years ago
PNAC contains ambivalent language toward bioterrorism and genetic warfare: "New methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- will be more widely available ... combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool"
abram730 4 years ago
targeting specific genotypes is the biological extermination based on races.
abram730 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you are fucking stupid stop obsessing over stupid shit.
mieery 4 years ago
I wonder what plans there are to implement eugenics today. I heard there are viruses out there that target specific races. The anthrax scares during 9/11 might have been a test of how hard it is to distribute such a weapon.
cinderblue 4 years ago
aids is considered a race specific weapon. certain people say it is more likely for a black person to get it in intercourse with an infected person than it is for a white person.
1schwererziehbar1 3 years ago
"certain people" say the Holocaust never happened. "certain people" say that God created the world in 6 days, and that his first created humans didn't become aware of their genitals until Eve was tricked into eating a piece of fruit by a talking snake. What's more likely is that black people - particularly Africans - tend to be less well educated re. STDs primarily because they tend to be poor. If you don't use contraception you contract Aids more easily. But you may prefer to remain bigoted.
RHutton2710 3 years ago
you do not believe that things liek race specific bioweapons exist, do you? please tell me two things: do you think that bio weapons exist? do you think that there are viruses that have different effects in different ethnic groups.
1schwererziehbar1 3 years ago
I`m jumping in on this conversation without reading much of the debate, 1schwererziehbar1, but what you say may be interesting. There may be race specific bioweapons, to my mind. there are certain types of anaemias present - particularly in W. Africa - that confer some resistance to malaria. This could be exploited.
I could be wrong..
Ps.I`m not the chap you originally replied to.
morgandrim 3 years ago
btw:
en wikipedia org/wiki/Racial_grouping#Disease_association_studies
1schwererziehbar1 3 years ago
You are the real bigot here. That is a statement made by people that are true racists and have been filled with hate.
ericaf06 3 years ago
Excuse me Africans are not less well educated
were is your proof have you met all of them. Stop stereotyping people.
Why dont you talk to me an african woman i will give you a few facts bye.
diyonisha 3 years ago
Love your voice!
You should get paid for the great job done!!
Hope you'll sign a book contract or whatever soon, if not already done.
majestyc12 4 years ago
nazi pursuit of jewish elimination was due to the perception of jewish people as both alien and a competitive threat. The process was sold under the propaganda of claim of inferiority. these are the examples of eugenics practices maliciously applied. Eugenics is no more invalidated by its misuse than the field of brain surgery by the ugly practice of frontal lobotomies.
drivebymessiah 4 years ago
Claiming that eugenics is wrong because hitler beleived in it is like claiming that gravity is wrong because hitler beleived in it. Before WWII most scientists beleievd in Eugenics and there is plenty of proof today to show that it is a valid science. Also there a practical applications of eugenics that could be apllied to todays society without infringing on basic human rights.
inmate1943 4 years ago
exactly, most of the dangers of Eugenics come from what is determined to be "inferior" traits. It this basic foundation of Eugenics that can be very dangerous. What do we define as benifitial and detrimental?
kungfuwookie 4 years ago
I wonder if Eugenics has a real basis and it is the Bush family and some Royal families we should prevent from reproducing for the sake of the planet ...
jupiterjjrm 4 years ago 2
jupiterjjrm, 3 generations of imbecile's would fit their own criteria.
hehe
abram730 4 years ago
It's is funny when we see the history run. today, everyone knows USA by their Black artists and athletes. Most of america's culture is under Black influences.
mitube1979 4 years ago 2
If radical environmentalists were to invent a disease to bring human populations back to sanity, it would probably be something like AIDS -- Earth First! Newsletter
The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans. -- Dr. Reed F. Noss, The Wildlands Project
If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels. -- Prince Phillip, World Wildlife Fund
louis12346 4 years ago
Eugenics is no more quack science than is planting better strains of rice
ronoman88 4 years ago
save the planet, kill yourself
gosciu555 4 years ago
I'm American and live in Germany for nearly 10 years. Through documentaries on German TV about the Nazis and their work I have learned that when they did sterilize or the person died /killed intentionally they sent a letter informing family of the death and requiring a burial fee! The families thought that the person was safe and didn't realize they were being tortured.
sabrinac1 4 years ago
"Daaaaaisy ... Daaaaaaaaaaaaisy
Give me your answer, do"
Dude, u sound like a drone
* yawn *
Lammero 4 years ago
These are videos I made a year ago in two days each...if you can find your way to my channel you can watch two full length films that are polished. click on PLAY LIST, clickMONARCH (I&II), click PLAY ALL VIDEOS and the segments will play one after the other. I agree that this work leaves something to be desires.
marsboy683 4 years ago
There was a man who left his life in Germany to avoid being drafted to the Nazi Army, he spent all his money to come to America. He married a woman who did the same thing. In America they were treated cruelly because they spoke only German, and they were experimented on for "Depression!" The American govt experimented on them. Govt is sometimes too strong...
shannagirlhug 4 years ago
Ask yourself who knows your needs better; yourself or a government? Would you trust them to pick your companion and mother or father of your children? Or do you trust your own ability to pick a mate? Human judgment is flawed so it is surely preferable that each person make the choice for themselves, rather than a few people choosing for the rest of us.
specialkalpha 4 years ago 6
So when breeding works well we are like dogs but when it doesn't work then we are better than dogs? that is interesting. Okay European royalty, some times you got an Elizebeth or a Cathrine the great but alot of the time you just got usless fops who spent their fortunes away. You also had the introduction of hemophilia through Cathrines line; so restricted breeding has lead to dead ends.
specialkalpha 4 years ago 4
Breeders rarely create the best animals only fashionable animals. Each pure breed suffers from health or temperment problems as a result of breeding exclusivly for certain traits with in a small gene pool. For example the lap dogs of the rich were bred to be cute but they are certainly not the "best" possible dog. Great Danes are bread to be big, but they suffer from deafness and poor metabolism.
specialkalpha 4 years ago 7
1.history of the federal reserve
2.ameriKKKa:from freedom to fascism
3.zeitgeist
watch these 3 films: )
FalseFlagAmerican 4 years ago
Beware of Zeitgeist.
Wajanker 4 years ago 2
why is that?
gosciu555 4 years ago
fundamentalist christians don't like it because it has different ideas about jesus. i as a moderate christian like it because getting to know other ideas is good for intelligent beings.
1schwererziehbar1 3 years ago
The narration on this is poor. The narrator needs to take some prozac or something.
cybersphere 4 years ago
the narration style is just fitting for the topic. letting some fox news fucktard narrate it would be an insult to the victims.
1schwererziehbar1 3 years ago
Nazi scum
Gooble74 4 years ago
You're an ignorant human being that would be an early target of negative eugenics. Hmm maybe you have a point :)
marsboy683 4 years ago
Learn to spell retard...then learn to read :)
marsboy683 4 years ago
You know that's funny that you say that.
I did a Google on "rules of nature" and wouldn't you know it ....The first rule wasn't "survival of the fittest" .
In fact it was stated that the phrase "survival of the fittest" has, since the 1950's , been widely regarded as a tautology.
Maybe those words were to big to fit out of your asshole
mlmr11 4 years ago
Mars, After 2001,the fascist members called me Jew.From then on they have controlled and harmed my female physiology,they threated that can not bear children.
They are Nazis. The Eugenics Movement begins in the UK and US.Holocaust？ I like eugenics,but I against holocaust.
Do you like child?
shinegirl000 4 years ago
That---^ whole 'argument' is one huge logical fallacy.
atheistnarnia 4 years ago
In order for the genome to do this there is always going to be some sort of intervention.
atheistnarnia 4 years ago
where is the first one? good vid.
keyanage 4 years ago
Gensis 3:15(King James Version) And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.... start loading up these comments with as many variation of this passage as you can find & make the computer reach a clear translation global warming & abstinance.... think & find all the texts...its a computer... human are the ones committing the act
kapazas2002 4 years ago
Positive eugenics drives th stem cell research market in the supply & demand market relations... Negative eugenics is self-governance (abstinence) based on legal & moral conscience ..adversely(see Thalidomide)...Racism · Sexism · Ageism · Religious intolerance · Xenophobia (general forms)
kapazas2002 4 years ago
I would sterilizate ALL people of nazis and fascist fucking ideas..and DON'T call in cause dr. DARWIN: he never spoke of eugenics!!
fenotipobombay 4 years ago
huh, have you seen Idiocracy (2006)? When you will, think ower what you said.
Nazis you see today on tv and streets are complete retards, but not every nazi ir such.
harijsk 4 years ago
Such as abortion today, eugenics was protestant, jewish, left and feminist movement.
daltonagre 4 years ago
imagine an army of dalip singh's with the mind of einstein.
hazelenoch 4 years ago
It's a shame that the US supported the Soviets, and not the Germans. Eventually the totalitarian part of NSDAP would have deteriorated, like it did in the USSR, but the world would've been a cleaner place, and provided a better environment for the white race, unlike the world of today.
Humanophage 4 years ago
By the way, the 'Eastern Europeans' mentioned in the beginning were probably of Middle Eastern origin, namely Jewish. These fled en masse from the Russian Empire before the rest of their nation destroyed it and found the USSR.
Humanophage 4 years ago
Starting with you and your family. Let George W. Bush decide if you get to live and populate. He's really smart.
dilbertgeg 4 years ago
Descent of Man Chapter 6 and 7
uber336 4 years ago
My family is crippled by mental illness. They have children and pass on the disease and their descendents live in complete crippling poverty and hopelessness. Better not to be born at all than be born defective. But I do not agree with the methods of the Nazi's and such. It would be good policy however to reward those born with genetic disease with a sum of money, say US$5000 if they agree to sterilization than let them have children that suffer from cradle to the grave again and again.
raulitech 4 years ago
Mental illness is a bag of bullshit!!
How about changing a system of mind numbing drones that crushes the human spirit?
This could quite possibly be the route of mental illness.
Some people absolutely refuse to numb their minds so instead they shut down.
Oversimplifying I agree but it's my story and I'm stickin to it
mlmr11 4 years ago