Nassim Haramein 20/45

[ikemkrueger]

9:45 That means changing the past, changing the future.

[ikemkrueger]

5:55 That's the thing with holograms.

[NickelNDime71]

Oregon city Oregon's third civil made elevator tells it all so does its view. lake os we go people.

[truthseeker010101]

I realized this long ago. The idea the planets rotate around the sun isn;t wrong, or a closed system. It was just the start of science. Give them time, thier science will one day lead to thier enlightenment of God. Or God will come down in human form , or through a mystic and tell them!

[craigonci]

i think his theories are about planet relationships...for some reason.... i also can not spellwell.the fellow packing my groceries cares the same on both issues..

....LIFE IS TO LIVE...

[gustomundo]

Not a physicist or do I intend to be so don't know if Nassim is on the right track or not however I do find his presentation extremely interesting. He is obviously a very intelligent and creative person regardless of the math behind his calculations. He should at least be given credit for that. Not really being that interested in physics I find myself watching this 45 part video for the second time...

[gorddown1111]

haha i went back to my van.

[intelligentbro]

If you can't understand what the man is saying, that's becuase your still unconscious.

[steeltable218]

@intelligentbro Totally agreed. Unconscious people cannot understand this man.

[thirdeyeblind3]

@steeltable218 seconded

[steeltable218]

@thirdeyeblind3 Don’t put archaic religiously-held notions in the same category as modern science. It’s not just a different animal, it’s a whole different zoo. And lumping Haramein’s very necessary critics with this kind of insanity is wrong-headed and fundamentally insulting. I would like to think that ‘spiritual seekers’ are open, fair-minded and compassionate – but there’s very little evidence of that from his followers here.

[steeltable218]

@thirdeyeblind3 I’m agog at the blind acceptance of his ideas, the herd behaviour of his audience, and the attacks on those who are simply – and fairly – pointing out his errors. Saying someone is wrong (with very good reason) is not ‘bashing’ anyone. This uncritical, blind mindset is what opposed Copernicus’ empirical reason. It’s the inherent quality of the closed, uncritical mind that Hitler used to rouse Nazi Germany. It’s the irrational, faith-based thinking that fuelled the Inquisition.

[steeltable218]

@thirdeyeblind3 You speak of agendas? I first came across Nassim in the magazine Nexus, (which has the occasional great article on media distortion and unreported stories). I liked what he had to say so I looked further into his work. I looked at his site, then the criticism. I investigated those rebuttals and was convinced by their clarity and correctness. This is not having an agenda, it’s just the inevitable outcome of a fair, even-handed investigation into his claims.

[steeltable218]

@thirdeyeblind3 I know that this argument can be used for Nassim’s position. He’s a naysayer to the establishment, an outsider that flouts accepted thought. He has the courage of his convictions, and spreads a message of unity, promising liberation through free energy etc. This is attractive and I respect him for this. But unfortunately, he’s wildly – and demonstrably - wrong about pretty much everything he says.

[cray32]

this guy is the truth, not to say he is telling the absolute truth, instead he presents more amenable theories. His messages make me feel happy to be part of this universe in health aswell as death

[superchild42]

This is why I only believe listen and trust only GOD. whO THE HELL do he think he is? I'm waiting on GOD to explain the beginning to me.. THe ONe and only. The one who created this earth.. not this fukking acid taker. rofl. He makes me laugh though, I give credit for that.

[thirdeyeblind3]

@superchild42 is god going to come to your room and give you a personal lecture? don't wait for that, maybe you should to listen to others and your heart. god created the one who created this earth. god is unknowable. if you were really listening to him you would know to not bash others.

[pusherx365]

I dont give a fuck if he has an award or not.....i dont give a fuck if he makes a couple dollars of his lectures or not....i dont give a fuck if he is a genius or not...if have found many truths in what this guys says aaaaaaannnnnndddddd if any other....FUCK CREDENTIALS AND ALL YOU LITTLE BITCH ASS PANTY WEARIN JEALOUS OF HIS ATTENTION HOs NEED TO SHUT UP AND JUST LISTEN TO THE GUY TALK>>IF YOU MAKE HIM OUT TO BE A "GENIUS" YOU WILL BE DISAPPOINTED....listen to him as another man n enjoy..shit!

[s3v3rdl0ck]

Who are these sceptics? Weird.

[TheBobathon]

@s3v3rdl0ck I think they're mostly folks who think it's important that scam artists are exposed. Nothing too weird about that.

There's a ton of evidence against Haramein.

[thirdeyeblind3]

@TheBobathon why are you going out of your way to try and persuade people to not listen to NH, if he is so wrong people would find that quickly. also i read your dissection of his paper and then read his dissection of yours. my thoughts were that you were almost completely erroneous on every "point" you made against him. you wont listen, but please stop, i want to hear what others have to say on these threads rather than you bashing everyone, including NH

[TheBobathon]

@thirdeyeblind3 That's not true. I'll listen to anyone who has reasons.

If you think I've said anything "erroneous" anywhere in my lists and explanations of Haramein's mistakes, please give an example and explain why you think I got it wrong. Or why you seem to believe he should be immune to criticism.

Alternatively, if you think any of Haramein's original ideas have ANY connection with anything specific that can be observed in the real world, please give an example of that! I've yet to see one.

[dbfan2scfan]

@TheBobathon

ROFLMFAO

You need someone to tell you where to look to see phi? Look in the mirror, at a plant, a sea shell, rotational paths in the solar system, the spiral of the galaxy, etc.

It's like you aren't paying attention at all to what he's saying, it's painful.

The sphere around the tetrahedron is seen SO OFTEN in ancient wisdom texts. Expansion and contraction, the female principle unfolding from the seed and the male principle folding towards the seed.

[anthonyp43]

@dbfan2scfan Yes well said that man.They imprison us,through manipulising our right brain,ie the male side.Its the hidden female aspect of the tree of life,that keeps us from evolving.If we know who our mother and father is,then we will unlock our prison.Thats the secret they hide from us.KEEP US AWAY FROM THE FEMALE SIDE,THE BIRTH GIVER,AND STEER US TOWARDS TJHE MALE SIDE,WAR AND POWER.

[EleanorHandcart]

Why do people think he's a genius? I find it very strange.

Seems to me that anyone finding significance in combining the motion of planets with the motion of the sun has to be stuck in some absolute space paradigm. I thought we'd transcended that in like the 17th Century.

His vortex is how we would have described things back then if we'd known about the rotation of the galaxy. Galileo would've kicked his ass with his ideas about invariance in the 1630s.

So y'all like this cat then?

[steeltable218]

@EleanorHandcart I think this chap would be better served to assert his ideas as artistry and metaphor, symbolic connotation etc. I think some interesting things might emerge, not as science but as art. He's obviously got a lot to say, but I think he needs to rethink his role as he's certainly no scientist, and if he's not careful his ideas may get the better of him. Art is a safer arena in which to go a bit nuts than science. And no, this guy's creative but he's no genius.

[EleanorHandcart]

@steeltable218 agreed. He's an entertaining creative guy. If he didn't pretend to be something he clearly isn't, or to understand things that he clearly doesn't, he could have made a name for himself. As it is, he just comes across as a bit of a joke. Shame.

[LordCinderWalk]

@EleanorHandcart youre thinking on a closed system that only has a minor grasp on the true physical geometry of what's happening. He's right. not about everything but seriously, do you think you could come up with anything half as intelligent and thought out as what he's saying, given the fact that his technique takes into account forces that have been omitted frm the mainstream?

History is made by those that hung heroes. do you want to burn this guy at the stake too?

[EleanorHandcart]

@LordCinderWalk I don't want to burn him at the stake, I'm just letting you know that he's a fake.

I see you'd rather go along with it, and attack anyone who disagrees with meaningless piffle. That's very sweet. Good dog.

[thirdeyeblind3]

@EleanorHandcart you aren't but you are the same sort of consciousness that killed copernicus, that let hitler take over germany, that allowed the inquisition to happen, you are the same kind of "sheep herder", consciously or not, that has slowed our progress. be more open, don't bash him, unless you have good evidence. truth has no opposites.

[EleanorHandcart]

@thirdeyeblind3 whoa, you compared me to Hitler?!

Man, you got some issues with reasoning! Get a grip!

I'm actually really nice. I'll consider anything presented to me thoroughly and well, listen carefully to what's being said, and reflect on it in the light of logic and evidence and my personal values, which are very charitable.

But if someone is faking scientific ideas and promoting their own lucrative brand of bull to the less-informed, I believe it's right to stand up and say so.

[steeltable218]

@LordCinderWalk I'll try one. Take a 'square root 2' rectangle (where the short side is 1 unit, the long side sqr rt 2 units). If you divide it and keep on subdividing it, you'll keep getting sq rt 2 rectangles. As far as I'm aware, this is the only rectangle you can do this with, so it has a fractal quality and lends itself nicely to infinite recursion. Now draw a circle, quarter it, place two ends of the rectangle at the N - S poles. The other two ends will touch the circle at 19.5 latitude.

[steeltable218]

@LordCinderWalk I know this as I've studied elementary geometry. Why does NH leave out something that ties tetrahedral geometry, the 19.5 model, infinite recursion and fractal geometry so well? Because he's a mediocre diletante who nicks superficial concepts from others, does no research, knows no science and comes up with no original ideas. What's he right about? Please tell me as I'm trying to find something. What forces have been omitted from the mainstream?

[thirdeyeblind3]

@EleanorHandcart who cares who is smarter? i like how he can explain the unified version of our universe to a seven year old. if i may ask, why are you trying to bash him?

[steeltable218]

@thirdeyeblind3 ‘Unconsciousness’ is being unable (and unwilling) to understand what truth means. It’s equating happiness with being correct. It’s allowing yourself to be led by someone who makes you feel good; thinking that‘resonance’ with what someone says means it must be true. It’s the unwillingness to accept hard truths. And it’s calling people that don’t agree with you (or your guru) as Nazis, ‘haters’, agenda-driven and impoverished in some sense.

[steeltable218]

@thirdeyeblind3 This constant, scepticism at the heart of science… not taking things on faith alone, but trusting when trust is earned. That can lead to self-realization and knowledge, not 30 years of crystals, debating abstract issues of karma or salvation. Try starting with what you really, really know, not necessarily what you believe. And be horribly honest with yourself! I know the borders of knowledge and belief can be hazy, emotionally-charged and it’s difficult to separate the two.

[steeltable218]

@thirdeyeblind3 ‘Higher’ consciousness doesn’t mean you’ve read a lot of spiritual books, think about higher-dimensional beings, believe in God, chakras or the afterlife. It has nothing to do with being ‘spiritual’. It begins with robust self-awareness, clarity, reason and lucidity; knowing why you believe the things you do; not reacting emotionally or thinking in stereotypes or cliché; living passionately but knowing when to think dispassionately.

[EleanorHandcart]

@thirdeyeblind3 I can see how it might satisfy seven-year-olds, yes.

I'm not trying to bash anyone. It's just that he's wrong. There's plenty of very good reasons why, they're easy enough to find if anyone cares to look, and some people might like to know.

[jadeaube]

You morons trying to dispell Nassims work are operating from the same information that Nassim debunks.... THe entire basis of your theories are flawed. Grow a brain

[MrMarrhead]

We'll see after peer review. Theres massive holes in your thinking that he addresses conclusively. For starters space is not a void. You miss the beauty of the inward/outward nature of eternal force.

[SuperTetrahedron]

Tis is not an exposition of Phisic and explenation of formulas and all that stuff. For all thoes guys who are trying to understamate Nassim's works they should stop their comments. This is a long speech about facts that are in our planet and solar sistem which tell us that things were not properly studied in the past. You need a formula to know that some the stones which were built the piramids are of tons of wiegth? No You dont need formulas. This are facts!!

[TheMushshroom]

I love this guy! Thank you Nassim!

[ssssskimannnnn]

Why do scientist start jumping up and down when someone starts thinking outside the square? He is only presenting theories and information,,get on with your lives and if you can make a better video do it!

[DrBerninski]

@skiman If we see that someone is fraudulent, should we not say so?

He's not "thinking outside the square", he's in a fantasy bubble. You can join him in the bubble so long as you don't question anything he says. Making stuff up is not "presenting theories", and this is definitely not information.

Go investigate the subject, find something out for yourself, don't just sit there going 'wow, yeah, cool'. Or find someone who doesn't lie about who he is and what he knows and ask them.

[ssssskimannnnn]

@DrBerninski 1) if he was trying to make you think "wow" as you so eloquently put it then he wouldn't spend 5 hours doing lectures to people in the physics AND non-physics communities at all. Because its a big waste of time. 2) everyone gets a real genuine feeling from Nassim, he is not doing this for shock value, and if you follow some of the components to his assertions they make perfect sense.

[DrBerninski]

@ssssskimannnnn You've expressed very clearly what a lot of people seem to think. I'd love to have a proper conversation with you that wasn't limited to little boxes, because the things you're saying really do need looking at carefully.

Lecturing for 5 hours does impress people. As does using convoluted jargon, which he does, virtually always in a way that's either incorrect or vague.

I don't doubt how sincerely people feel his ideas to be true. He is very effective at misleading people.

[ssssskimannnnn]

@DrBerninski @DrBerninski Whats wrong with something making perfect sense? He isn't trying to "sell" his ideas, in the world of high level peer review Grand Unified Field theory physics it doesn't do any good to have "mainstream" folks on your side, It just doesn't. His equations are under intense peer review and are doing fine, this was years ago. He has moved well through the physics community. Many people have wonderful theories which we never here about because this community is so elite.

[DrBerninski]

@ssssskimannnnn Of course there's nothing wrong with something that makes perfect sense. That would be great. Choose any video you like, and I could point to several claims and assertions that are total nonsense, and explain why he's parted company with reality or reason in each case. They're all littered with things that are transparently wrong. And he certainly sell his ideas. He sells DVDs, training courses, conference calls, and puts out for funding for projects, all based on falsehoods.

[DrBerninski]

@ssssskimannnnn I don't know what world of high level peer review grand unified theory physics you're talking about, but it's not the one on this planet. If Haramein's theories had anything about them, they'd very quickly receive a lot of interest within parts of the academic scientific community. They have not received any such interest, and neither would they stand up to any peer review in any physics community, because any physicist can very easily see that they're wrong.

[DrBerninski]

@ssssskimannnnn If you have evidence to the contrary (re comment below), I'd be interested to see where they came from. Your view of science is a cliche and a myth. Science is very open, but for obvious reasons it's only open to those who can do science. Haramein gets doors slammed in his face not because he's outside some priveleged clique, but because he's clueless. You say "he has moved well through the physics community" and he "lectures to people in the physics community"? Not true, is it.

[EmDee3d]

He is cocky in some regards granted, but the mechanics of his entire theorey is novel, and theres alot about current science that just doesnt always add up naturaly. Scientific communities get indoctrinated just as much as religous, it seems to be human nature. Both sides of any opposing idea always seem to pick faults and fight with eachother it seems. Im neither for or against any theorey or scientific model, so im no..nassim worshiper.

[zybyl]

His theories are not just wrong, they are less than wrong. They are "not even wrong". This is a guy who says UFOs fly into volcanos (which are really black holes). lol. He says "pulses" from the sun will "ignite" Jupiter (while somehow not scorching the much closer Earth). lol. He blatantly edits a video of a comet to make it look like it was "deflected". lol. I mean come on!!! The guy spews nonstop garbage.

[Karma01010]

Anyone who does not grasp the sheer dishonesty of this "work" is just educationally challenged. Anyone who thinks this man is a "genius" needs to learn the basics of experimentally-verified atomic physics and relativity, then come back and laugh at the lameness. Harameins "work" is as shallow and misguided as astrology and homeopathy (but I guess many of harameins uneducated audience will believe in those as well)

[thirteen13x]

Anyone who does not grasp the importance of this work, is just spiritually asleep. Anyone who thinks this man is a charlatan needs to do some research of their own, then come back and try to make out of hand statements in regards to its validity... the esoteric and physical implications are as far reaching as fire and the wheel....

[TheBobathon]

Who here claims to be so enlightened that their feelings are reliable guides to truth? If someone tells you stuff, investigate it, test it, think about it.

If it's research you want, then google haramein fraud

and you'll see a detailed analysis, and lots of solid reasons as to why he's a charlatan.

There's nothing "spiritual" about manipulativeness and deception.

[Karma01010]

The "earth was flat" argument has now become an infallible indicator of crankiness. Used by those who cannot muster a factual reply, it isn't even a logically valid argument!

Also, ancient Greek knowledge of sphericity never faded, and all major medieval scholars accepted the earths roundness as an established fact of cosmology.

Please Google "myth of the flat earth".

[radsimu]

"The earth is flat" is valid argument actually. It makes a point and that is that people don't care, don't get informed, don't want to, in other words are stupid. And as a proof to that you have Galileo Galilei. BTW I searched haramein fraud... didn't find solid shit about it. If you can come up with something good, ok... why are his theories wrong? I don't believe in everything he is saying btw but some theories are good and revolutionary. You have to give him credit for that.

[TheBobathon]

Searching for Haramein fraud works for me, but try Haramein fraud or sage instead.

He's got lots of pretty ideas that appeal to people and might SOUND revolutionary. I could argue that everyone's been wrong for the last few centuries and in fact the earth is a hyperboloid. I could give cool stories that sound like reasons, and some people might think it was revolutionary - it turns existing ideas upside down! But it's not, it's just some bollocks that I made up.

That's no way to gain respect.

[rhungri]

To all those who mock the extraordinary work of this man just remember that when the statement was made that the Earth is actually round and not flat it was treated as heresie!

[indie3]

Sigh. The same old tired non-argument. What you forget is that most heretical claims in the past have turned out to be wrong.

[nunezger]

@indie3 why you keep commenting and watching all Nassim Haramein videos if you think he is full of himself. you dont have anything better to do. i wonder how it is that people like nassim video(98 vs 11) but at the same time approve your negative comments on the video (10 thumbs up).

[FreeSoulz444]

There are no boundaries in a dream...that would be an ideal reality...

[Karma01010]

No he did not win an "important award", he submitted a cranky error-riddled paper to a minor COMPUTING conference in Belgium where he knew it would not be rejected (as it would have been if he had submitted it to Nature, or any proper physics journal !). Nassims deluded followers are brandishing this "award" around as if it's one step away from a Nobel Prize. Totally dishonest!

[steeltable218]

@Karma01010 perhaps a worthy successor to Richard Hoagland...?

[gorddown1111]

@Karma01010 open your mind and listen to what he is saying. most of today's physicists are holding on to false ideas, in the end human evolution will reveal and the true physics will speak for itself. Nassim Haramein is a Guinness!

[kash959]

this guy is obviously full of bull crap.... earth does not radiate experiences into the void of space :-s wtf... this guy has no equations backing him up... obvious charlatan

[ironmaiden0419]

@kash959 he just won an important award for his physics, you moron! are you a physicist? You dont even know what your talking about! lol! Just because you watch the science channel, doesn't make you a physicist! your so pathetic!

[kash959]

can u give me the name of the award and a link to an authentic website to prove ur ascertion...

r u a physicist??

i dont need a degree in physics to know that nyone claiming to be able to use human psycology to travel back in time is obviously talking bullshit...

[ironmaiden0419]

@kash959 well on youtube type up atom are mini black holes

[ironmaiden0419]

@kash959 good point! but this guy is the real deal.

[yonadav3]

are you numb in the head? this guy's a genius!

[blisssis]

Thankyou. You just explained why when we do past life regression we travel through vortices to arrive at the past memories.

[exagonos]

the vision of cycles has been always misunderstood, the idea of repetition has a tremendous impact in counsciousnes provoquing a sense or felling of "Here comes again" resulting this manytimes as a state of boringness or so, limiting creativity and sometimes creating dispair....... excuse my english, i usually speak spanish,:)

[exagonos]

Its very interesting what he say on 7:30 bout the psicological effect of percieving planetary movement as if it was hapening at the same position in universe, ill say that as in other semanthics, (names and simbols for percepts) at the time of naming were stoping the perception of transformation in/of reality.. so maybe, things like the months should have diffrent names every year, people should change its name tru time and transformation, the simbols should change as the facts change....

[dasgroover]

4:24

actually - he states later on that light is not moving - does not travel and everywhere simultaneously

so - when we say 'every moment' - what we should gather is that there is only this moment - the now

[camiller3754]

Most must still change before times end, the time to do so is now.

Peace.

[randoolymiester]

Schauberger-"cycloid spiral space curve motion". Think about a REALLY BIG causation=21-12-2012?

The Mayans knew/know this rotation.

WOW, I've jumped forward in that 180 degree fashion, only in dreamstate.

[aaronCapricorn]

vortices is just a fancy word for cycles and waves.

[mirandansa]

This reminds me of Ken Wilber's "Spiral Dynamics".

[mikisheadmaster]

wow...

[trashmail8]

One other name to drop every know and then: Viktor Schauberger

[mellervin]

Whether he's nuts or nut, I respect him because as you said, he's up to sth even if he can't proove it.. And this time and effort deserve respect and maybe also honor -I read he has presented a paper discussing the corollis effect in EFEs-

[slackologist]

I don't think he is nuts. he may be over enthusiastic..and can't be right about everything (he is human) but i think he is onto something and its worth listening to either way.

[mellervin]

listen carefully from 7:00 till 8:56 where he says "and I've done this many times myself !!".

Is this guy nuts? How come he's gone back in time and experienced what ppl felt like?

Please reply me

[fannoj]

I hear it as he have SEEN it on ppl's faces .... not that he feel what they feel

[robertojerez]

check out time line therapy and NLP, what he says makes total sense and its amazing that he has gotten there from physics. Age regression in hypnosis is the same thing, just he has explained the mechanics of it, believe it or not! he is a genius!

[punkotek]

just wanted to write exactly the same.

[robertojerez]

commented on your page!

[survival12345]

the space spiral part, truely genius. i cant believe i didn't see it before... weither you believe space is expanding or contracting it completely makes sence....

[ElGranUjaar]

Interesting. The way I see time is a spiral regarding earth rotation... So, although I see this in a compressed vortex, it seems reasonable to keep a eye on this structures.

[BrokenBassBin]

Quack

[nsprphg]

how does the comets that comes from deep space find the sun if the sun is not in the same space? great speaker.

[herzmeister]

most comets have large orbits but still have orbits, that means they have a "home sun"...

at least that's the observation for our own solar system which is quite remote in our galaxy. in more "crowded" places in galaxies though, it's imaginable that comets would "travel" from sun to sun on "wobbling" paths

[inflateablesoulmate]

gravity plain and simple.

[mibambino2007]

Im not a physicist at all but this guy is mind blowing. Mainstream science is lying to us on purpose, they know this shit!!! Im happy that he is not dead from the gov't trying to shut him up. This infomation is going to awaken alot of people who wants to be awake. Beautiful just Beautiful work!!!!!

[MasterShans]

This is silly analogy built on metaphor built on conjecture

[BlackSUNrising12]

Du Hasenfuß!

[igethigh]

can the 180 degrees be karma?....if u get wat im sayin

10000/10

[DeaDNery]

awesome.

[captainroger]

Pure brillant thinking, very enlighting.