Added: 3 years ago
From: BorkaBonum
Views: 8,022
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOl 1680x1050 is good but vid quality is horrible

  • do you have a 4870 512 or 1gb?

  • Oh, 512MB.

    At the time I made the video(s) the 1GB model wasn't on the market, atleast not in this area.

  • who is the better pls tell me because i will to by tomorrow HD 4850 1GB

    or HD 4870 512MB

  • the Palit HD4870 Sonic Dual Slot edition is the best HD4870 512 mb... you don't need 1gb... the memory is useful only in 3d programming and web design... but the hd4870 is better so get this card and put some videos when in action :)

  • yeah yeah i buy the hd 4850 1 gb this coment have 30 days

  • hd4870 is better

    because 4870 is GDDR 5

    but 4850 only GDDR3

  • 150fps ? with 3 way GTX280 on top settings ?

    with resolution of 1024x786 i some how would belive more then that, impossible.

  • Ignore the kid, he's obviously making things up to get some attention.

    Or he's playing on 640x480 on low settings.

  • You don't get it!!!My friend has Two if ATI HD4870x2 and it is too slow!!!

  • So? It's still a 8.000SEK solution against a 12.000SEK solution, three cards against two with the advantage with homefield-driver support.

    And why put so much effort into Crysis? To be honest the game is a one-way trip down the trash-can. You'll play it through and then just forget about it.

  • would you say that a dell inspiron 531 could play crysis on low settings for graphics and all that stuff

  • GTX280 Tri-SLi = Three videocards with 12.000SEK.

    HD4870X2 is ONE videocard worth 4000SEK.

    I don't need to say any more.

    (SEK is the currency in Sweden)

  • u use triple card = ati single 4870x2 HHAAHAHAH~~~

  • wow RacerF1BMW! You are a total IDIOT!!! lol

    1. Crysis if Fucking made for Nvidia! It runs better with nvidia cards because game developers are IDIOTS!!!

    2. you have 3 gtx 280 in sli? wow that's very good. I bet ur daddy bought them when you turned 15!

    3. You fucktard! Your running 3 gtx 280 in sli COMPARED to 1 single hd4870x2 (which has 2 GPUs). Your friend is getting 80 average in fps MAXED OUT with one card......compared to yours 100 fps with a FUCKING 3 cards in sli!

    4. You're FuckTard!!

  • yeah

  • will this run okay with an intel core 2 duo 2.2ghz?

  • Btw is Enthusiast settings better then gamer?

  • Enthusiast = Very High (formely known as "DirectX10")

    Gamer = High

  • Intel better or AMD?

  • For processors Intel has the performance advantage at this time - but if I were you I'd hold on to my wallet until January as AMD has some promising models en route, such as "Phenom II" which is a new revision of the Phenom with a new core and three times the cache.

  • Serious?

  • pto noob de mierda, aprende a apuntar, en linea te quedai parao asi y hata mi viea te mata caga de la risa

  • omg you noob

  • ... Okay?

  • *lol*

  • It doesn't run at the speed you like and you blame the PUBLISHER? EA is a very good game publisher and have made some very knowable titles. It's your CPU Causing this. Just face it, it's a crap CPU.

  • Blocked, you absolutley doesn't know anything about what you're talking about. EA Games is known for buying licenses, raping them to the point it's not even funny to make fun of and pushing their release dates so early the products are NEVER tested before launch.

    And no, it's not my CPU causing this - the CPU isn't stressed enough to cause a bottleneck of such calibre.

  • the graphics isnt really nicer than crysis,

    but you get only 30% of the performance.

    BAD

    EA is the badest employer of all at the moment

    Spore is bad, too

    and they got money for a beta version

    BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDD­DD

  • i totaly disagree, and i don't think i am the only one..

  • Visuals aren't truly tuned up, just polished a bit and certain effects and buffed.

    EA Games is the worst publisher on this planet, and I'm quite certain there's anybody with any experience to disagree with that.

  • can i play Crysis on V-High/DirectX 10 with this?

    Sapphire HD4870 X2

    Intel® Core 2 Quad Q9550

    Asus P5Q Pro

    Samsung SpinPoint F1

    OCZ 4 GB DDR2-1000 Kit

  • You can play on Very High (Enthusiast) quote obviously as I did in this video on hardware listed in the description.

  • So you say you didn't buy the game then i'm guessing you pirated it. I know you don't like EA but that definitely doesn't make illegal downloading okay. Or if you got the game in a different way, i'd like to know.

  • What harm would downloading make anyone anywhere? If EA wish to stay outdated and to remain the worst publisher in human history they have to deal with it, and investing time in anti-piracy is not the way.

    I'd glady buy games and applications from Ubisoft, Sierra, Valve or even Blizzard, but never from EA. Scandal after scandal EA never chances and refuses to listen to their costumers, to their developers or even test their products before launch.

  • I would have to agree with you there, EA are terrible publishers, I don't know why Valve is actually letting them publish Left 4 Dead, although it must be a lack of money. They aren't good.

  • is 22 fps really playable?

  • 22-32FPS, I'd say so.

    30FPS is great for this game, 40FPS is perfect.

  • Agreed, I don't know why people say less than 35FPS is shitty and unplayable. Some people even say 60FPS is too low!

  • Actually I must say that has much to do with the game itself. Crysis runs absolutley perfect at 40FPS while Call of Duty 4 runs sluggish (visually) at 40FPS.

  • I guess that really comes down to what the game was optimized to run at. Games locked at 30FPS (consoles mainly) are made for a cinematic experience, as is the same with Crysis. Though I'll agree that COD4 does look a little sluggish at anything below 60FPS, which it was optimized to run at.

  • well borka, what do you think about warhead ? ;)

    I got it yesterday on release. I think it's really really nice. Everything is a major improvement to the game and I even liked Crysis very much, so this is just awesome :P

  • Well, atleast Warhead was a bit better than the original game this far - while I didn't like the first game at all, really. Crytek just failed to deliver the characters or interesting design in my eyes.

  • well, did you buy this ? cause i have been playing a little multiplyer, and I must say; everthing is a HUGE improvement. They have made the game much more alive and attractive to other players. There is so much more going on at the moment at the Warhead servers. They have made minor things better, but all these things are important, so now it's just really really enjoyable to play.

    But that's just imo :)

  • Nah, I didn't buy it. It's a EA-publishment and I never buy EA Games but for an exception for Battlefield-games. I only have bad experience with Electronic Farts published games, the last game from them I bought (except for BF: Bad Company) was Tiberium Wars and I hated myself for wasting my time and money with that crap even to this day.

  • I agree, EA is crap. But you can definitely see that it's Crytek who have made this game work. All the little details is not something EA would care about at all. I can only recommend multiplayer. It is really fun. In fact, I got a friend hooked up on warhead, so go he'll buy it in this week :)

  • Yeah, it's a great game. Although I just had another crash when loading the last level..

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more