Also we all have rights to:Believe want we want to, say what we want to, and many more. Im pretty sure every one here is mature enough to not be stupid and fight over somthing that happend 10 years ago. Now i do realize that over 2,000 people died(may they rest in peace) but you guys need to pick your head up and focus on whats happening in a post 9/11 world. Sence we caught Bin Ladin our chances of getting hit by a dirty bomb are much higher. Thank you for your time.
All the 9/11 "thurthers" as they call them selves, that at are at Ground Zero every September 11th go up to the families that are there to remember loved ones and start to bother them is just hurting the families even more. Now dont get all pissed at me for writing this but i believe that the government had no involvement in 9/11. And if you think differently, then thats your opinion and i respect your opinion because you have a right to say your opinion. Please dont start a fight over this.
this massive assassination was done by,,,,the rulers ,,,rockefeller, bush, cheney, rumsfeld, zelikow, walvowitch, rudy gugliani, silverstein,,,,and more ,,,,in the cfr, bilderbergs, and all this societys that want the new world order for us,,,no bin laden and 19 morons AT ALL,,,,its amazing that they made us believe this BS,,,,when you see the famous first bin laden tape found by cnn,,,ITS JUST RIDICULOUS that man is not bin laden ,,,,he just have a beard,,,thats all in common...
how about "bang" being the sound of the massive supports failing and "3 explosions" being the massive floors falling onto each other just before the rest of it all sounded like a huge roar that just kept going (that's what I heard from 10 blocks away that day, by the way).
i think this is a very easy question to answer like all the official xtrange things,,,like fire can melt the steel? NO WAY, fact,,,,
so , if you watch the collapse (the blow out of the buildings) you will see that aproximately disapears like 10 FLOORS PER SECOND,,,, and this would be the roar,,,,(pushing your luck), but no way the 3 EXPLOSIONS DOESNT SOUND LIKE 1 BANG EACH tens of a second,,,,
of course not but even if the building on the hot spot melted or weakened only that part would have desapeared....the lower floors cold and strong as always would still be there, but anyway if we agree the melting point is not possible as a natural byproduct from the fires explain why they found molten steel in wtc7, 1 , 2
If one or more floors fell on another (with also weakened structures) could you imagine that the weight and forces involved might cause a chain reaction of exponentially increasing weight and forces?
Also,
I saw the fires 1st hand and I don't think it's definitive from anything I've seen on posts on melted metals.
It was a blast-furnace of unprecedented scale.
If you can post something that shows accurately what temperatures were actually reached (not theoretically) I'd be interested.
yes i could imagine that in a bulding that is NOT a tubular structure, 90% air , with a 47 core columns , the building would never collapse on itself and if it happens because all the core columns where the damage were cut at the same time, will never fall almost in free fall speed, actually it will loose speed until stops, and in case was constantly pankaking would take at least 1 flloor per second...not 10 floors per second
and afterwards you would fine a pile of floors not just dust
wouldnt that mean the building would have collapsed on him? cause once they started falling, the building was doomed. it wasn't section by section that floors fell. that building collapsed at a very high speed. he said something pushed him back too...
just something to think about. im not forcing any view on you.
If the buildings were able to topple sideways they wouldn't have been there. If they had to help them fall straight down - more power to them because the cost in lives of toppling sideways would have been so great that Bin Laden might have gotten the Jihad he wanted!
Also we all have rights to:Believe want we want to, say what we want to, and many more. Im pretty sure every one here is mature enough to not be stupid and fight over somthing that happend 10 years ago. Now i do realize that over 2,000 people died(may they rest in peace) but you guys need to pick your head up and focus on whats happening in a post 9/11 world. Sence we caught Bin Ladin our chances of getting hit by a dirty bomb are much higher. Thank you for your time.
OeroNinja 6 months ago in playlist WTC
All the 9/11 "thurthers" as they call them selves, that at are at Ground Zero every September 11th go up to the families that are there to remember loved ones and start to bother them is just hurting the families even more. Now dont get all pissed at me for writing this but i believe that the government had no involvement in 9/11. And if you think differently, then thats your opinion and i respect your opinion because you have a right to say your opinion. Please dont start a fight over this.
OeroNinja 6 months ago in playlist WTC
The "bullet shots" were demo charges, many people heard, and saw their flashes in the various buildings.
azvideoguy 1 year ago
watch?v=MCiDKxzpMao
vsv23te 1 year ago
building 7 had open-buttresses to accommodate for major open space needed for heating?fuel tanks if I remember correctly.
Please prove that melting points couldn't have been reached in any of the buildings.
Asking questions doesn't make an answer.
TiqueO6 2 years ago
this massive assassination was done by,,,,the rulers ,,,rockefeller, bush, cheney, rumsfeld, zelikow, walvowitch, rudy gugliani, silverstein,,,,and more ,,,,in the cfr, bilderbergs, and all this societys that want the new world order for us,,,no bin laden and 19 morons AT ALL,,,,its amazing that they made us believe this BS,,,,when you see the famous first bin laden tape found by cnn,,,ITS JUST RIDICULOUS that man is not bin laden ,,,,he just have a beard,,,thats all in common...
martyr2005 3 years ago
Comment removed
everwoodxoxo 3 years ago
how about "bang" being the sound of the massive supports failing and "3 explosions" being the massive floors falling onto each other just before the rest of it all sounded like a huge roar that just kept going (that's what I heard from 10 blocks away that day, by the way).
TiqueO6 4 years ago
i think this is a very easy question to answer like all the official xtrange things,,,like fire can melt the steel? NO WAY, fact,,,,
so , if you watch the collapse (the blow out of the buildings) you will see that aproximately disapears like 10 FLOORS PER SECOND,,,, and this would be the roar,,,,(pushing your luck), but no way the 3 EXPLOSIONS DOESNT SOUND LIKE 1 BANG EACH tens of a second,,,,
martyr2005 3 years ago
doesn't have to reach the melting point to weaken it enough to bend, does it?
TiqueO6 2 years ago
of course not but even if the building on the hot spot melted or weakened only that part would have desapeared....the lower floors cold and strong as always would still be there, but anyway if we agree the melting point is not possible as a natural byproduct from the fires explain why they found molten steel in wtc7, 1 , 2
martyr2005 2 years ago
If one or more floors fell on another (with also weakened structures) could you imagine that the weight and forces involved might cause a chain reaction of exponentially increasing weight and forces?
Also,
I saw the fires 1st hand and I don't think it's definitive from anything I've seen on posts on melted metals.
It was a blast-furnace of unprecedented scale.
If you can post something that shows accurately what temperatures were actually reached (not theoretically) I'd be interested.
TiqueO6 2 years ago
explain why they found molten steel in wtc 7, 1 , 2
only explosive can explain pyroplastic flows , and 1500 f degrees after 4 or 5 weeks and the molten metal , why building 7 fell?
martyr2005 2 years ago
yes i could imagine that in a bulding that is NOT a tubular structure, 90% air , with a 47 core columns , the building would never collapse on itself and if it happens because all the core columns where the damage were cut at the same time, will never fall almost in free fall speed, actually it will loose speed until stops, and in case was constantly pankaking would take at least 1 flloor per second...not 10 floors per second
and afterwards you would fine a pile of floors not just dust
period
martyr2005 2 years ago
wouldnt that mean the building would have collapsed on him? cause once they started falling, the building was doomed. it wasn't section by section that floors fell. that building collapsed at a very high speed. he said something pushed him back too...
just something to think about. im not forcing any view on you.
HellgazerXD 2 years ago
the three loud explosions are anyone's guess.
maybe this maybe that.
here's one. three main supports gave way. do you know there weren't any that at that point in time would have succumbed to the forces involved?
We can ask all the questions we want (a major tactic of many skeptics) and never provide real answers but that doesn't make facts.
TiqueO6 2 years ago
Controlled demolition no doubt!
ladollyvita 4 years ago 11
If the buildings were able to topple sideways they wouldn't have been there. If they had to help them fall straight down - more power to them because the cost in lives of toppling sideways would have been so great that Bin Laden might have gotten the Jihad he wanted!
TiqueO6 2 years ago