Added: 5 years ago
From: socratesdaemon
Views: 11,644
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (84)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LaRouche is a James Bondish type evil character, and has been around for a LONG time and is well-known in America. He's OBVIOUSLY a major flake, but pretty slick. He propagates an odd, almost populist mix of far left and far right views

    Mr. Duggan sounds like he had some kind of psychotic break-down, maybe schizophrenia. He was the right age for the onset of schizophrenia.

    Why are many middle-class, 'Gifted' kids/students often gullible? Street-Smarts 101 should mandatory in every school.

  • @dingleberry1989

    Hi F*ck face, I understand the linguistic techniques that you have used and I understand psychiatry, go off and ply your trade somewhere else. If Mr Duggan was beaten to death by people then dumped on a road after he had been murdered to make it look like a road accident, it would be a case of murder and that is exactly what may have happened.

  • Another lie by BBC. This is a extrem left-wing group not a right-wing group in America.

  • As a former member I was working with extreme right ppl. In the end of 70s we worked with fascist/revisionist group "liberty lobby" and KKK Grand Dragon Frankhouser.

    It is a cult. The BBC is better informed than you are. Just scratch the surface...

  • The newer movement is absolutely more left-wing than right, however, they will work against both Democrat and Republican depending on the subject. As for the BBC. I have had personal experience with them and they absolutely twist information to create the story they want. So as for scratching the suface...I'm beyond that.

  • so, the BBC "made this story up "? the BBC have the highest standards of journalism integrity in the world. Fact. The larouche people had the opportunity to answer questions in this documentary. They refused it. Then you blame the journalist for "making this up"? Think.

  • Moreover, the "left-wing" or "right-wing" labels don't apply to the larouche cult. It does NOT matter. As a former larouchie, I know this for a fact. They are opportunists (and Machiavellian).

    Yep you are so much "beyond" scratching the surface that you missed the point.

  • I'm not sure what your arguments are. I never said larouche wasn't a cult. Then you try to "correct" me by saying larouche isn't left-wing or right-wing. If you would take the time to read my post, you'll see I stated that. As for BBC, it's the worse news reporting agency in the world. It lies, creates false truths, and ignores facts when it comes to America and Israel, and/or freedom. Say what you will, but I'm done w/this post.

  • Nope, you didn't state that. You wrote it is a "left-wing group not a right-wing group". My point in reminding you it is a cult: it does not matter. It is irrelevant!

    As for the BBC, I really don't care. It s your problem, but I disagree when you re trying to dismiss this documentary "because the BBC lies"... That's cheap and leads to nowhere. End of the story.

  • I think slisar is right on the BBC.

  • Larouche recently said after the financial crash: "You've got a democracy in the streets now, they want to kill these guys. That's the democracy I want to hear from, I don't want to hear from these so-called Democrats; I want to hear from the killers!" (...) "I'm going to kill anybody who starts talking about getting a consensus committee going." Found at larouchepac com

  • LOL. You may hear what he says, but its quite obvious you don't understand it. "His" world view? Rooted in conspiracy theory? If there is one thing that you may have against LaRouche, its that he does say the term "British" even when he isn't refering to all the British. But that is context, that i doubt most would be smart enough to distinguish between. His message is definately better than the jokers we have running the show currently. Slavery a.k.a "free trade" is what's wrong with the world.

  • I really don't see how Lyndon Larouche is a "cult leader". Just because he has views that one might find offensive doesn't make him a cult leader in the mold of a David Koresh, L. Ron Hubbard, etc. After 9/11 I became interested in "alternative" sorts of media, not that I necessarily believe it all but it is informative at times. Anyway, the more I sort of sought these things out the more it seemed that England and specifically London plays a surprisingly large role in a lot of global events.

  • I agree. Just because larouche has views that one might find offensive doesn't make him a cult leader... Even Koresh or Hubbard said interesting things.

    Anyway larouche considers himself as a cult leader as he wrote in his bio (1979, pp 76-77) he wants to "make men in his own image"... (hence the highly appropriate nickname "larouchie")

  • A cult will always brainwash their members, keep them from family and friends, education, and so on. larouche does just this. His members also live together and work for his cause. Most do not have outside jobs as for their focus is to further the larouche cause. Without larouche calling his group a cult, it's clear to anyone who takes the time to read the signs.

  • Mate your trivialisation of the title of cult leader is pretty bad.

    Koresh is considered one of the most devious characters in recent history (a mass-murderer, anti-federalist and bible prophet). I can draw paralells between Hubbard and Lyn though, having first-hand knowledge of both these groups.

    Duggan's death can be compared to many Scientology deaths which have occured over the years.

    Another interesting LaRouche death is that of Kenneth Kronberg, look it up.

  • Koresh was not a mass murderer, the government attacked his compound and set it on fire. He was an anti-federalist and a bible prophet, but so are a lot a people in Texas.

  • Well I reckon when you instruct your followers to open fire on a ATF officers and has members all trained in effective suicide techniques, that might be a little bit of point agaianst the man.

    Secondly the cause of fire wasn't ever fully determined; however your theory is usually the consensus of people sympathetic with the Davidians.

  • The LaRouche people seem too extreme for my liking. They dont seem to make a distinction between the British and the elite. Its like they have a hatred of everything British.

  • This is a family, and maybe a good founding family, But the Course is out of control, Lynden, and family

  • lyndonlarouchewatch d o t blogspot d o t c o m

    Join the resistance

  • Calling the LaRouche movement anti-semitic is totally false. It shows one has not examined the literature at all. It is a movement which studies history and has identified the primarily British influence in starting both World Wars (they put Hitler in!). Jeremiah Duggan's death was an unfortunate traffic accident! Listening to Berlet or King on Larouche is like seeking firstly the most biased, anti-LaRouche view on LaRouche; these people have made a living out of it. FDR is NOT RIGHT WING!

  • Officially, Jeremiah Duggan's death wasn't caused by a "traffic accident" but by "suicide".

    As we say, the Devil is in the details...

    Check larouche's "details" on Jews, zionism, holocaust, judaism etc.... If you re honest enough you ll be in for a surprise. Study his literature for the last 40 years and u will reach the same conclusions as king or berlet or 1000s of ex-members of his org.

    PS: Indeed FDR was not rightwing but larouche is not FDR either!

  • i looked at all the things you said, but i found more of it to be libellous, slanderous, unfair, and untrue than anything else.. larouches opposition appears less credible than himself.. they appear to be saying anything they think people will beleive to discredit him... too much of it is altering the truth or contrived

  • This is sad. I know someone who is involved with these clowns and I'm sad to learn more about it. It's amazing that someone can get sucked into this!!! All I needed to do was glance over the pamplets to know they are bad news. Scamtology is banned in Germany. I hope LLM gets the same treatment! Like all cults, they give enough truth to sucker people in then they can bait and switch. Reminds me of "Conferdacy of Dunces" too much!

  • I hope the person you know manages to get out. It's pretty scary. I knew someone as well and the poor, naive, bastard ended up in tremendous heavy debt by the time he escaped.

  • There's not much difference between LaRouche and L. Ron Hubbard, both of them were totalitarian nutters.

  • There are LOTS of problems with the world, they cannot be solved by some Wizard getting untop a podium and making magical incantations! This is all that LaRouche promises, we ALL have to pitch in for ourselves and eachother for ANY result (because our problems ultimately originate in us)!

  • Either the kid did commit suicide or things whent out of hand in that LYM cell.

    I just want to say this: LaRouche makes some good reading and has plenty of good, indeed important, points about mass manipulation of society, and the importance of the cultural values and mental health of the nation, but SERIOUSSLY! How is this ONE MAN ever going to change things all by himself? This is the sort of thing that takes generations of work and a complete governmental overhaul.

  • I admit some of the things LaRouche says sound extreme at times, but really think it through, look at history, get out from under your own opinions and really take a look at what's happening today, where we are, and where are we going,

    ...for as a nation if we do not come to grips with this, we are disintegrating, and witnessing the end of America.

  • Elin48, you're right that good Americans need to stand up and fight for our country again. However, you don't join forces with bad groups like larouche to do it.

  • Where is my comment here...since my comment was different than the general comments, I wonder, is this video here precisely to discredit LaRouche, and no other comments will see the light of day.

  • I went to a few Lyndon LaRouche meetings. These guys are weird. I didn't have a pencil, so I went outside to my truck to get a pen. As I started to leave, people noticed, STOPPED WHAT THEY WERE DOING, pointed at me and started saying "man going out the door! man going out the door!" Weird.

    Another time, I told them they should get a permit before setting up booth at our college. They responded by calling me a homosexual that hated homosexuals and was high on methamphetamine.

  • Larouche is a convicted FELON. I DO NOT DOUBT THAT HIS CULT IS TO BLAME FOR DUGGAN'S DEATH. He's teachings are anti-semite, they hate the Brits, and Larouche's wife has her own cult following in Germany.  That to me adds all up to this young's mans demise... I am almost certain that they killed him and that they are concealing a lot of crucial facts from the law. They should investigate these lying bastards up their lying asses.

  • Before you do not doubt something, really question it, think it through.

    LaRouche's ideas are not anti-semite, and it is not citizen Brit which are hated,

    ...but the invisible oligarchy of great wealth (and the banking system) which has since the Boston Tea Party hated this once new land for going against it's powers, creating a nation state of America.

  • Why dont you start questioning yourself before? Larouche is an antisemite and his followers are involved in antisemitic campaigns: the enemy are the "Synarchists", a term coined under pronazi Vichy regime in France against jewish bankers Worms and for Larouche, synarchists are now led by jewish refugee Felix Rohatyn and other jewish financiers he calls Nazis or "locusts"!

  • you sir, are a propogandist.

  • FDR pretty much robbed the American public of their gold. That seems unconstitutional. FDR is from a long line of bankers and had deep connections with members of the Federal Reserve. I really like alot of things LaRouche has to say, but to admire a crook like FDR seems a bit hypocritical. FDR is one of the main reasons(blame W.Wilson too)we have this jacked up economy today. In my eyes FDR help plant the seeds for our destruction.

  • Actually the gold standard stopped working properly in the 19th Century (not enough gold).

    FDR changed the ratio because people insisted that currency be valued against a weight of gold. Post WW2 the USA had the world's largest gold reserve again. No damage. The USA lost the gold when France insisted USA honor their Vietnam War Debts. Nixon ended the gold standard and pegged the dollar as a floating commodity thereafter. This has proven to be more realistic system than the gold standard.

  • did you plagiarize your ideas from alex jones, or just paraphraze them?? every comment you writes is as if it was ghost written by AJ

  • Crazy Alex Jones, that the man has prognosticated and brought to the light "elites" policies for us "lay" folks makes him crazy. Get outa' here.

  • Who did America fight in the Revolutionary War? Oh, it was fucking England! You thought they changed all of a sudden? America is being hijacked you stupid fucks!

  • yeah - that was 200+ years ago! They changed, you didnt! The US control the Brits military and technology, a great deal of their economy, part of their politicians and even their culture! Open your eyes, you larouchie.

  • I am not a LaDouche follower. Just read the constitution, and you will see the problems. The constitution, remember that?

  • Yes I do. Was the constitution written by the Brits?

  • The constitution was written to protect us all this bullshit that is killing us today. Federal Reserve, unconstitutional. Income Tax, unconstitutional. Patriot act, unconstitutional. North American Union(Kinda reminds you of the European Union huh?), unconstitutional. The disregard for Habeus Corpus, unconstitutional. The constitution was created to protect us. But we didnt protect the constitution.

  • so, what about the Brits?...

  • Well said doubleaamazin! For good men to do nothing aids in the bad men taking over and destroying what was once a great country. Just look where we are now. A socialist about to enter the White House because the good guys have done nothing.

  • This video is made of win. These guys literally chase me across campus between classes!

  • i pass the larouchies every day on the way to and from work and every day for the past nine years i have been greeting them by saying GOOD MORNING LAROUCHIES, HAS THE ECONOMY CRASHED YET. They absoulutely hate it and the look of frustration on their faces is hillarious.

  • No, but the country has crashed. Im not a LaRoucher, but I do admire their patriotism. They are trying to help.

  • They're far from patriotism. Just because they won't go away doesn't make them patriotic. A serial killer stalks his victims and will not stop unless he is caught, that doesn't make him patriotic, it makes him a stalking serial killer. larouchers are cult members taught to recruit. That makes them dangerous cult members. Call them what they are and nothing more.

  • Hey LaRouche kids, you like the classics, don't you? Check out Marlowe's "Doctor Faustus". It's about a frustrated academic who gives his soul over to a demon that promises to make him a genius.

    Who knows, maybe you'll see some parallels in your own life.

  • For those who wonder who really is larouche, check at this forum where 1000s of posts are written by exmembers who ve spent decades working for him and know him better than any new recruit/LMY-er at factnet org

  • And Mr Judas, what makes them right? I take the following idea, when looking at someone, Judge a man not by his words but by his actions. Why don't we have a sane discussion on a forum? See if we can socratically prove something about LHL? Its better than you just insisting everyone else is naive. How do you know Mr LaRouche?

  • why dont you go on facnet org to meet the other "Judas"? As for larouche's "actions" (which ones?) why dont you ask Molly Kronberg to know who killed her husband?

  • Again Judas, I ask you who you are. Do not hide from the light if you speak the truth. I ask you to prove your claims, I ask you to debate this. Are you insinuating that Ken Kronberg was murdered? Have you been to the police about this?

  • You want my name, what is yours? You try to divert the discussion which is about larouche, not about me! You really have a polizei mentality, Ibykus1981

  • it is an induced suicide

  • Induced by his mother? By the Tavistock Institute? I want your affiliation, your name if you wish to give it. Are you an ex-LaRouche member? Are you a paid agent? This is what I mean.

  • You might get along with Jeremy Paxman. He seems to be happy to lie and get paid for it. Difference is he earns a tiny bit of respect because he has the balls not to deny his identity.

  • Why you so hateful and angry man? I have heard about your tribe-sorry if that is not correct word-of racists being angry, but why you hate good man Larouche?

  • because he s not a good man! one advice: dont believe what he s saying- he s a compulsary liar and has destroyed too many lives. You look so naive.

  • Please pardon my bad English, but why you Amreicans so hard on Larouche. We wish we had such a man to vote for in other countries. He is very respected in many circles in the world. He is man of Peace, Platonic agape love and an most great economist. We say viva Larouche. Tres Bien Lyndon-Presidente' Lyndon!

  • maybe because we KNOW him for 40 years- does that answer to your question?

  • I do not feel he reaches out to the mainstream of ultra conservatives. He has bashed their concern over same-sex marriage, and probably lost quite a few loonie-votes in that. And if his rhetoric was all fake, he would more effectively turn to the christian right, but he does not give himself up to one particular group - not evangelists nor "commies". If all he wants is "power", you are indeed calling him a fool! And by the way, I'm not sure there ARE many others, but i would hope so.

  • no, it s the title of larouche's "campaigner" magazine where he denies jewish holocaust and equals zionism and nazism (among other things). Just google it, there s so much documented info about larouche's antisemtism. Of course if u r blind i cant help...

  • Chip Bertolet has been a paid propagandist against Larouche for many years. If he's involved with a program slandering him; it must be bullshit. From the literature I've read by Larouche; there is nothing that would induce anyone to commit suicide. And how can he be anti-semitic when well over half his organisation is run by Jews. Duggan's death is tragic but not the result of some kind of Kool-Aid cult.

  • Well, the difference between Chip berlet and Larouche is that Berlet uses Larouche's own words! Go to his website before accusing anybody of "propaganda". The Larouche org has a record of 40 years of propaganga! So who is talking? As for "half his organisation is run by Jews"... that s propaganda! I happen to know them... and by the way J Steinberg is not jewish (only his name)

  • O.K. How about Harley Schlanger, John Sigerson, Debbie Freeman, Anton Chaitkin, Phil Rubinstein ...etc. etc. Funny about Jeff Steinberg. He looks and talks like a New Yorker from the 'garment district'. I guess looks can be deceiving.

    If Larouche is such a Nazi pig; he could start a right pogram and book burning ceremony in his own backyard.

  • (Schlanger has converted to catholicism by the way.) But true- many jews in the lar org have turned antisemitic. The infamous antisemitic and revisionist larouche's "Campaigner"; 'Zionism is not Judaism' was entirely written by Jewish members. It s a shame. After all larouche is the first to recognize that "nazi Jews" do exist - indeed they do... in his own organization!

  • Cuckoo

  • for your info, the fall 2003 issue of larouche's scientific magazine "21st century" had an LYM article entitled: "BURN the textbooks!", about their workshop in Germany. That year there were events in germany to mark the 70th anniversary of the nazi bonfires by the Hitler youth... Coincidence? Maybe.

  • It turns out that Mr. Jeremiah Duggan, may he rest in peace, attended only one LYM meeting in Wiesbaden; stayed a couple of hours, got bored, left and was later found dead in a apparent suicide on the German Autobahn.

    This was all the very thorough, T's crossed, i's dotted, German Police could ascertain. Case dismissed. Case closed. He was not kicked to death and left to die on the road. He was not a LYM member.

  • sorry but your "info" is wrong. He attended a 5 days conference + "cadre school" (not a "couple of hours"), confronted larouche et al... many witnesses saw him distressed and under pressure (not "bored") But u r right he was not a LYM member... interesting comment, what r u insinuating?

  • It's well known that Larouche love to recruit Jewish people then brainwash them into believing his teachings. In other words, he retrains their way of believing about themselves. When someone points out larouche is anti-Jewish, larouche can place one of his brainwashed Jewish members upfront and claim they aren't anti-semitic, but embrace the Jewish people. It's just a front.

  • I have a question to whoever you are replying to people who appose this documentary. Who are you? Are you some concerned person or something? why do you fight it SO strongly? Just struck my as odd that's all. I'm not in the LaRouche movement and not apart of it. I took a look at the LaRouche website and saw the hole webcast that they had, and I was really impressed on how much knowledge and wisdom he had in general.

  • Because the style of the attacks against this documentary indicates me that they come from members of the larouche youth mvt, not from any "ordinary" citizens. I know their "language", their rethoric and I know their mvt far too well. I know how many lives larouche has destroyed, Jeremiah Duggan being his latest victim. The sad thing is that these youths will understand that in only 10 or 20 years time...

  • This is a most interesting commentary. The reason I am against this documentary is that it is total bullshit, as is any claim of anti-semitism against LaRouche. On the whole question of Jeremiah Duggan, I would merely say that the German police found no other possible cause than suicide. Regarding the documentary and Duggan's mental state, or mental health overall, I also cannot comment. Fact is, there is no link between the conference and Duggan's death.

  • I know... Larouche says he is not antisemite, only evil collegues he s kicking out of his organization are... but why did he say only "a million and a half Jews did die as a result of the Nazi policy ... who were murdered in the same way that Jewish refugee Felix Rohatyn ... propose to revive today"? that was in 1978 Campaigner "Zionism Is Not Judaism" and the Rohatyn=nazi campaign is still alive... init?

  • ... also why did he recently defend the Zayed Center in Abu Dhabi (closed for antisemitism and revisionism), where he was their guest? etc etc

    One day you will discover that larouche is just a liar...

  • Most pedagogical. Nice to finally see some stuff coming out here. LaRouche wrote about the 1.5 million, but I cannot comment either way as to the number who were murdered by the Nazis. Its 10 million or more people according to the UN, right? Prove that LaRouche is a liar. That would be interesting.

  • Well not really... EIR reported in march that "Swiss banks warn of worst financial crash in history". Then Lar wrote cautiously in May that ""financial officials"'s forecast of an oct.1987 crash as a "good guess"". THEN when it occurred in october, Lar said HE forcasted it, omitting of course his "sources"... Yet another LIE.

  • Larouche said that he is "the world' s best forecaster living during the past 40 years" Well apart from the fact that since 1975 he has "forcasted" a financial crash EVERY YEAR, he claims to have forecasted the october 1987 crash.

  • Larouche said he predicted the 1989 crumbling of the soviet empire

    in a 1985 EIR Special Report, called "Global Showdown". In fact he wrote in this document: " All those who echo Henry A. Kissinger, in babbling the falsehood, that the "Soviet empire is crumbling," and so forth, should be disregarded or jailed". Quite the opposite init? So Larouche LIED about his socalled prediction of the crumbling of the Soviet empire. In fact it caught him up by surprise, he was at the time expecting WW3.

  • Larouche's lies? Where to start?

    Well a "funny" one... In 1976 LaRouche wrote:

    "Labor Committee and allied Communist forces ... are working overnight, constantly, to bring into being a new Marxist International throughout the capitalist sector." The next year he wrote, in a ery "Orwellian 1984" way: "I never had the conception of founding a "true Marxist" association... We have never been Marxists..." He was lying up his nose like a Pinnochio!

  • of course "Labor Committee" are larouche's organization: the "International Caucus of Labor Committee", aka "ICLC".

  • you seem to know so much but say so little... blaming people with no evidence is like blaming the jews (or any other group) for all the evils on earth, the nazis did the same. That s the difference between propaganda, myth and "documented history". You have to apply scientific method to History, not just repeating "catch phrases" like a parrot. So please "enlight" me....

  • Ok, a reply, Hitler was disgusting, he was a greenie, a nazi, a mass-murderer, but he was put into power by people worse than him, just as was pinochet, as was Napoleon. Now if you want to know, there is plenty of stuff on the British Queen and friends, read for instance 'Dope Inc.' or 'The Hitler Book' for more information about both of these people. I jovially await an answer of Shakespearean wit, and Socratic genius.

  • I have read Dope Inc. (incl the 1rst version- more against the Brits and the jews than the 2d one and with an "interesting" defense of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" - u know??) and also the "Hitler book". I may be more informed than I appear ;) The thing you dont get is larouche's "method".

    With this method he can demonstrate anything and its contrary. Go back to their archives and you would be in for a big surprise... I prefer reading Plato or Shakespeare. At least on that we agree...

  • Thats all they read, PLATO and SHAKESPEARE... surprised to read you read all those books cause its built on PLATO and SHAKESPEARE...

  • nope, it s built on Hegel and Kant...

  • Ok, EIR and all of La Rouche's writing don't do much elese but try to discredit the 2 writers u r mentioning as the bases for LA Rouches ideas ?!! seriously ! Which LR literature do u refer to that's built on HEGEL and KANT ??? !!!!!

  • u re so ignorant! larouche was hegelian, kantian and marxist... then when he moved to extreme-right he turned "leibnitzian" and "platonist"... cos hegel and marx didnt appeal much to conservatives circles. Funny that Leo Strauss was a platonist ;-)

  • Well boo-hoo! I'm from sweden, so just about everyone here in their 40-60's is a "former Marxist" - it was the social-political platform of the time, no? Our people, on the other hand, never came to terms with it in an intellectual manner, in following decades. I say your case of philosophical transposition makes me trust him MORE, in that case anyhow. especially with the Kant - Plato/christian renaissance shift.

  • there is no philosophical shift, thats the point. It s all tactical: eg to reach out ultra conservatives. That s why he is confortable attacking Leo Strauss, despite being a platonist... Larouche doesnt believe in philosophy, only as mind control.

  • learn your history. This is probably even undisputed by the god of the internet, Wikipedia. And no, the current queen had no part in burning of people back then. I recommend you think before insulting the queen like that. She may or may not be a drug-pusher, but this is different from an arsonist/murderer in this sense.

  • By the way, I suggest you reread my comment... I didnt (obviously) insult the queen, it was a question and my question was and still is about "being worse than Hitler"... dixit Larouche (by the way Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information, anybody can write anything there, even you)

  • Interesting, most funny comment about the Brits being more evil than Hitler. Odd though that the Bank of England were key in the rise of Hitler.

  • the Bank of England? wow! just tell me more... and did the Queen burn the Jews and Gypsies as well?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more