Added: 4 years ago
From: speccy
Views: 109,671
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (75)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • man you are awesome, thankyou so much for these vids

  • thank you so much for sharing your wonderful knowledge

    God bless

  • WE UNDERSTAND THE BOTTOM LINE IS THE MONEY... HERE'S A QUESTION, WHAT IF ALL THESE GUYS WHO MAKE AND CREATE THESE MACHINE, GAVE THEM AWAY? THESE GUYS WOULD BE CONSIDERED HEROS AND THEIR NAMES WOULD GO INTO THE HISTORY BOOKS PERPETUALLY...

  • Although the Inventor safely stays away from saying it . . . this is a Perpetual Motion Machine. So far all Perpetual motion machines eventually stop due to physics saying it is impossible to move forever without using Energy. But I am soooo curious as to HOW LONG this thing will run !!!!!!!!! Why did they not test that and report on it !!!!!

  • i think it is related to the coil inside the generater. the coil behave as an inductor.when it shorts,the coil release the stored energy by the fleming law of electromagnetic induction. this drive ithe induction motor to rotate which cause acceleration

  • did you say 50+ volts???

    --get that inside an elec vehicle NOW

  • The link in the video's description is not working.

  • Genial!!!!....even if it is not a "forever rolling" machine...it can help a lot in the loss of energy....

  • I watched what you did in 1,2,3,4 . But Im not sure what the purpous is. Does the toroude improve the effence of the motor? Can you produce more energy than you use? Did you touch the back of the toroude to the shaft?

    Thay were great vedios. And very interesting. I just would like to understand it. Sorry I didn't understanding. Which were the benifits and which were the disadvantages.

  • You shouldn't need a bunch of MIT associates to tell you that the principle behind it- getting more energy out of a universe (system of objects) than you put into it- is impossible (unless there's a change in state from matter to energy).

    So his device is essentially a highly efficcient gear device that doesn't slow down in a two minute clip (but will eventually slow down due air and gear resistance).

  • The rpm is about 700... NOT 50!!

  • It was shown to MIT, you backyard scientists. Let them decide about it, you don't have all the details, so STFU.

  • We all know about conservation of energy stuff which is very logical. (At least to our 'current logic')

    But this guy is basically demonstrating that he can obtain more output by reinjecting Back EMF in the system. Nobody talked about over unity !

    It seems the induction motor is not strong enough to combat the load initially

    but with additional Flux, becomes powerfull enough to accelerate the system.

    Is this how you people perceive this ?

  • Come to:

    overunity dot com

    There is all documented.

    Many thanks.

    Regards, Stefan.

  • It was shown to scientists and they yet not know how to explain. Read the news, nobody is announcing a perpetual motion motor, the guy is showing a generetor that doesn't work as it should( that's the meaning of peripeteia) and doesn't know how to explai. Don't be so eager to judge.

  • I'm scientist and I know how to explain this machine. He has adapted the power of an enormous dynamo placed at some distance from his laboratory/machine shop. When this dynamo is activated the electrons from it cause his machine to spin and perhaps even to useful work. This dynamo is at the local power station and he "activates" it by plugging a hidden wire into the wall receptacle. Only rubes believe this foolishness.

  • Are you realy serious? A scientist that can't form a complete sentence. Seems like alot of work to fool you. Why would anyone go to those types of measures just to be debunked at the end.  Dude, you need a hobby.

  • "This thing won't work."

    That is correct, it is bullshit. But that won't stop him from selling it to idiots as an "investment opportunity."

  • I seriously don't get you. You answer Yes or no to a question that you can't answer with a yes/no response. He's Not claiming "OVERUNITY" you wack job. He's Demonstrating that there are ways to use back EMF in your favor!! PERHAPS a key to the gateway to overunity, but he NEVER MENTIONED OVERUNITY!! it's only a "DEMONSTRATION".

    You're so pessimistic it's disgusting. I'm sure U would have called Nikola Tesla A wanker and out of his mind for thinking AC is the way of the future. AND HE WAS RIGHT!

  • That was directed at Desertphile who blocked me when he was drunk..

    Yes it WAS PLUGGED INTO THE WALL.. It was a constant or what you call a "Control" in a scientific experiment. The "VARIABLE" is the inductive load that's generating current and HOW IT AFFECTS THE MOTOR'S OPERATING SPEED. He NEVER ONCE SAID "Oh wow! Look! I'm making 97123478 volts off this motor and I'm getting 120 in. Oh gee! It's overunity!" He NEVER SAID OR SUGGESTED THAT

    What's you big deal about being so negative anyhow?

  • When coils are shorted it creates "impedance mismatch" between source and load resulting in load reflecting virtually all the power back into the source which channels it back to motor via ferrous material in coupler - which induces the acceleration. The spinning wheel becomes an energy STORAGE device storing more and more kinetic energy as it spins faster with no way to dissipate it. Will continue until centrifugal forces tear it apart.

    The device is not PRODUCING energy. It is STORING it!

  • That sounds about right. I was going to make a post on my blog tomorrow about this.

    Neil_Polymathes

  • this is a fake. By the laws of physics this is completely impossible!

  • so your still subscribe to the theory that the earth is flat?

  • IT IS A FAKE UNLESS IT WILL PROVE OTHERWISE!!!

    By the laws of physics known today it is impossible.

    If the system does accelerate it means that there is a gain of energy, I doubt it.

    this video is not proving anything, he even did not operated the system in a Faraday Cage.

    I bet any one for any capital, that it is a FAKE!!!

  • Teknokracy: he demonstrated in an earlier video how the system could accelerate (somehow) under load, so any mechanical resistance could be overtaken. I don't know how this can work, but I'm seeing it with my eyes. There must be some...stuff. M3h, it's probably Jesus.

  • does he mean revolutions per second? how could that be rpm?

  • Fantastic!! Congrats & good look with this project !!

  • Rather than debate it...why not put it to the test. Try it out, see if it works. There's your proof. It's kind of like put up or shut up.

  • if this system maintains a certain voltage and speed, what about the resistance of the drive shaft? It's not possible to have a mechanical resistance of zero, there is always loss due to drag, friction, etc. even if it maintains itself at a certain speed, it will never maintain that forever... could be minutes ordays before it slows down to a stop, but it still makes far from perpetual motion. "Lisa, how many times have I told you that in this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"

  • gay

  • There is no perpetual motion claim here.

    The motor turns *faster* under the *same* power input when he allows the Back EMF to enter the system.

    The motor is running more efficiently, getting more RPM, but there is still power to the prime mover. There is re-introduction of the Back EMF into the system. But not enough to disconnect power. It is simply a slightly more efficient motor now.

  • I agree with msronlinemsr's comments

  • ERTW

  • Heh, in any time he shows that he actualy shuts down the generator. He just points the camera at the instruments :p

  • It is a good test to hire physicists if they are able to pinpoint the errors !!

    A basic electomagnet brake, like used in trucks, trains like TGV.

    When you change the coils connections, you increases or decreases the brake. He does not show the speed with no iron of the coils in front of the rotating magnets. A proof is that this free speed is higher than any others.

    It would more convincing showing his lawnmover cutting grass with no power cord or battery !!

    or TGV without nuclear power.

  • good luck with this! MIT is already having a look at it, so far they're puzzled and can't explain it.

  • no they haven't, so far no such thing is proven invented.

  • this guys breakin the law. hes breakin hella laws. science laws.

    hes a rebel.

  • Comment removed

  • However there is nothing that proves your theory in the video either... ;)

  • It was shown at MIT with witnesses. I doubt he'd fake it and put a power supply in this video when MIT professors were able to inspect the (working) system by themselves,

  • Comment removed

  • All of these series put together are about an hour and I don't see any claims here about it being a 'miracle energy device'.

  • The inventor can't explain it because he doesn't even have a degree in physics... Bizarre.

  • Jealousy Jealousy Jealousy...You can't hide it!!!

    Many inventors don't have degree in physics. What made you upset cyborgtroy is degrees don't always trigger your creativity and most of the time now, they don't give you a better job...Anyone can have a degree in anything when one wants...India and China are live demo of what threatens you and makes you really upset!!!

    Jealousy....

  • Where is his webpage? I want to see the circuit. His test should easy to reproduce.

  • Where is the circuit diagram???!?!?!?!?!?!?!

  • Comment removed

  • I believe he already holds patents on whatever he has working.

  • Comment removed

  • Nope, he applied for a Canadian patent, which was denied...

  • How about coffee and donuts instead? I don't know of any crumpet shops.

  • A shunt-wound dc motor doesn't slow down under load - no magnets needed. It will continue at whatever field power is fed, no mater what the armature needs to draw to maintain speed. Also, only mentioning volts and not amps means you have not presented any measure of power.

  • If the Law of Conservation of Energy were true, everything would fall apart at the atomic level. There is energy that exists at the atomic level that we can tap into, such as Nuclear Energy. This is essentially the same thing, but of course without a reaction, but it's the same power. It's been called shock energy, kinetic energy, zero point energy, but simply put it's atomic energy.

  • Actually, no.

    I assume that you are referring to nuclear fission/fusion. These are not, in fact, "free" energy, rather, they are the result of converting a very small amount of matter to energy via the equation "Energy = Mass x (Speed of Light)Squared" -- Einsteins famous E=mc^2 equation.

    No violation of conservation there.

  • Haha... yes. Syndrome, you are correct.

    But Mrs. Incredible and I will stop your nefarious schemes before you build that.

  • zomg

  • YAWN!

  • why isnt this being covered more?

  • Cause perp motion machines pop up all the time and are constantly debunked, nobody in the real world takes them seriously anymore.

    With good reason...

  • Um, duh, post the questionnaire.

  • "An explanation as to why and how the Law of Conservation of Energy can be violated is explained by Texas A&M University in this questionnaire I sent last year."

    "This questionnaire"? What questionnaire?

  • yay

  • zomgwtfbbq

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more