OH COME ON - IT STOPS JUST BEFORE THE REDCOATS :/ VERY NICE VIDEO ALTHOUGH :D (CAN SOMEONE GIVE ME A LINK OF WHERE I CAN GET INFO ABOUT WHEN THESE EVENTS ARE TAKING PLACE)
its sad to see scotts saying they are proud to be british thats like saying you are proud to have been beaten by and controlled by the english sad at least the irish gave those brits a fight when they tried to take over their country any scott who is "proud" to be british is like jews in ww2 saying they were proud to be nazi prisoners its crazy i guess if you cant beat them join them
As a proud Scot I have to say I'm proud of also being British, and the part Scotland has played in the rich history of the British isle. I hate having Scots Nationalists ramming their idiotic and dangerous claptrap down everyone's throat and expecting other Scots to simpley accept their piont of view, which I have to say in a minority one.
@poomtang If the Scots chose to be an Independant Nation, we wouldn't have had the Black Watch in America, who kick ass along with the Royal Welsh Fusiliers! Celts FTW !! .... I'm Welsh you see :D
No, you're not that keen on being called British, I, for one am, so don't impose your Nationalism on other scots! We have a great history of fighting in the British army in all the great wars which many Scots are proud!
yeh and english ,welsh and northern irish dumbass hence british forces most yanks hate to know that because the brits are all posh in there eye's well there wrong lol
all the allied nations did their part to win ww2 including britain and u, the british didtheir part by making their stand during the battle of britain, if britain did not won the battle of britain, hitler might have taken the whole world and america did their part too by dropping the atomic bomb , because if the atomic bomb was not dropped, the invasion of japan would cost the allies hundred thousands of cassualties.
I dno who you are whether Brit or yank, but you are aware the brits did the same things Yanks did plus 3 yrs more fighting... Think of the fighting before dunkirk then all the commando fighting in europe before d day and all the fighting in africa and italy etc. Brits are so uncredited for all they did becoz the yanks obviously take the glory for stepping in late.
Battle in Tobruk? Battle in Guadalcanal? Operation Garden-Market? Small local fight, speak soldiers of USSR. We loose more people then your both army.
Don't want to be mean, but thats because your army was SHIT. You made em charge into lines of well placed and covered gemans soldiers and tanks ffs. Not trying to base all this on what i see in movies becoz i know you guys did brilliantly to counterattack and send them on their way back to Berlin but still, you lost many cos u werent trained properly etc
@RetardedPickle Yep, great british army have 1100 tanks against 200 german tanks in Libia. At the end of battle Rommel have 148 tanks, british army have less then 400... Mmm? Good training and genius HQ??? Are you really think so? Learn real History, try to read some books, it can help
were allies! and great allies at that so stop fighting between eachother, Britain wouldnt have defeated Germany but we held our own and would of continued to do so, we was giving Axis forces big problems in Africa, RAF Bomber command started nightly air raids on the german heartland, Germans were starting to see they werent invincible, we resisted and tackled their U-boats, all in all we did bloody well, we showed Germany that they can be fought effectively, America kicked that into action
pacific campaign; British and commonwealth troops comprised a large part of japans enemy, British, Irish, Australian, Indian, Chinese, New Zealand. how can u say america defeated them single handed? its ridiculous, neither was capable of winning without the help of eachother, America was more powerful, they were a sleeping superpower, Britain is a much smaller country with a far smaller population, but look at wat we achieved against far superior numbers!!!
@verification2000 Your Forgetting Russia too, they were on Japan's doorstep and had some brutal battle's too, The American's take credit for everything!
that is true, we basically defeated Japan by ourselves while helping Britain fight Germany. And even before we declared war in 41 we were helping Britain since 1939 with money and supplies due to the lend lease act. If Britain didnt have the financial help of the US in 1939-40 the outcome could have been different during the Battle of Britain
Thats an unfair comment, The USA couldnt of won world war 2 without Britain
1. we contributed vast man power to the campaign, D-Day; 84,000 of the 156,000 troops deployed for the assault were british, 80% of the allied naval force deployed was British, and 50% of the air armada was British RAF.
2. Market Garden; 10,000 paratroopers of the 34,000 airborne troops were brits. also all of codename "garden" were british(the armoured element)
@verification2000 True, but you must have forgotten that the US supplied thousands of weapons, food rations, uniforms and other supplies to the British when they were attacked by Germany. A US base in Hawaii was attacked which is why the US joined the war but the only reason we were really in Germany was to help out the British, not the other way around. The British hardly helped the US in the war they were actually fighting, in the pacific.
And they didn't supply as much as you said they did...It was commonwealth countries like Canada and Australia that did all the suppliying
"pacific campaign; British and commonwealth troops comprised a large part of japans enemy, British, Irish, Australian, Indian, Chinese, New Zealand. how can u say america defeated them single handed?"
@verification2000 and if britain would have fallen the allies would have needed to do a d-day landing on britain AND france without the help of britain
Without the Americans In world war two, the war would have been drawn out much longer. With potentialy millions more casualties. Remeber in 1942 America was the supreme power, where as the British Empire began to decay in about 1900. Those are facts, not opinions - I'm not saying Americans are better than British or visa versa.
not exactly.... Britain was faced with many logistical problems in the colonies, the terrain alone proved unfit for european style battles... Had the americans not cried for help from the french, you would all have english accents today...sorry its true, britain was slappin that american ass.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
we beat your british asses twice and saved your ass in ww2 and now america is the only super power left. america had british beat anyways before the french helped.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Revolutionary War: Britian-30,000,000 People VS USA-3,ooo,ooo. Royal Navy VS No Navy. US allies 10,ooo French troops vs 30,ooo hessians, woodland indians, loyalst formations. Worlds largest empire vs a new Republic. Results- a decisive US victory that stunned the world!
lol typical american going over the top that result didnt stun the world, Britain new what would happen if they didnt commit more troops but after continuing the fight while studying the shipping profits they decided america wasnt worth the man power / cost for the resources it was bringing in.
especialy when much greater civilisations were causing bother e.g. spain and france
I like these uniforms redcoats -very impresive today im happy that now exist many historical clubs that reconstructed historrical battles in europe(mainly napoleonic era) and a can march and fight for one of these clubs (like austrian Grenadiren 1798 uniform :) in central europe-Czech repulic,Poland,Austria,Hungary (battle of Austerlitz,Hollabrun,Nysse)if you want some info about it please write the message to me
300 years is pathetic. Just think, there is no such thing as a true American. Your heritage is probably European. Hey, it could even be British. Also, you speak English. Yup, our language. So please, refrain from the insults. That's all I ever here from Yanks. Insults, insults, insults. I have shoe laces older than your country.
battle of britain happened germanys invasion failed terribly then u fuck tards jumped on the band wagon becoz he you noticed germany were on the back foot not been able to invade britain.
not jsut in ww2 the proof is all over you americans havnt weon a actual war yet without help.
maybe we couldnt have took on germany on our own after all the counries they took, but thats only becoz we were in ww1 and then had to suffer ww2 ALONE until u cowards decided to jump in once germanys invasion of the final outpost of the UK was a total mess.
if we didnt destory all german hopes of invading britain u would of never came and "saved us" as you retards put it.
I'd like for you to speak to any American veteran who fought in Europe or Japan and call them a coward to their faces. What have you done with your life? Sit behind a keyboard and call others cowards. Do you honestly think that Britain alone could have mustered the strength to ever create an offensive against Germany without our help. Get off your high horse and open a History book.
i didnt say britain did it all on ther own u daft twat, comment when u read or at least understand what i put.
america had a tiny role in the end but as per usual u prats like to pretend u saved the world on your own. if it wasnt for uk putting germany on the defensive in the battle of britain america would of continued to hide.
YOU? No. Hitler was put on the defensive by the Soviets. He couldn't take Britain by air so he turned his attenton to the Eastern Front. I obviously can't argue this with you because you're too engrossed by stereotypes about Americans that you skew even historical facts.
Make no mistake Britain did their part. I do not disrespect British veterans the way you disrespect American ones but to think that Britain did all the work was preposterous.
Yep, us rebel colonists, with the help of the French who were weakened still from their defeat in the 7 Years War, defeated the most powerful military in the world.
This is from the reenacted siege of Fort William Henry, in New York. The original event took place in August of 1757, and this was from the 250th anniversary last year.
OH COME ON - IT STOPS JUST BEFORE THE REDCOATS :/ VERY NICE VIDEO ALTHOUGH :D (CAN SOMEONE GIVE ME A LINK OF WHERE I CAN GET INFO ABOUT WHEN THESE EVENTS ARE TAKING PLACE)
KOSMASTRILIVAS 3 months ago
Looks like a bunch of Christmas ornaments.
MyNameNeedNotBeSaid 7 months ago
the soldiers preceded by the green regimental banner.. are they the militia or something?
tette666 10 months ago
its sad to see scotts saying they are proud to be british thats like saying you are proud to have been beaten by and controlled by the english sad at least the irish gave those brits a fight when they tried to take over their country any scott who is "proud" to be british is like jews in ww2 saying they were proud to be nazi prisoners its crazy i guess if you cant beat them join them
jcolossale21 11 months ago
@jcolossale21 Absolute nonesense, you obviously have received a very poor standard of education.
drunkest100 10 months ago
@jcolossale21 wow your a smart one ain't you...(just so you know that was sarcasm retard)
danuk500 9 months ago
@danuk500 yea i wish i was as smart as you hero
jcolossale21 9 months ago
pathetic how Scots loathe to be called British. It's like males not wanting to be called human.
HelmutVillam 1 year ago
As a proud Scot I have to say I'm proud of also being British, and the part Scotland has played in the rich history of the British isle. I hate having Scots Nationalists ramming their idiotic and dangerous claptrap down everyone's throat and expecting other Scots to simpley accept their piont of view, which I have to say in a minority one.
poomtang 1 year ago 3
@poomtang If the Scots chose to be an Independant Nation, we wouldn't have had the Black Watch in America, who kick ass along with the Royal Welsh Fusiliers! Celts FTW !! .... I'm Welsh you see :D
LolFishFail 1 year ago
Scottish and British are different, we Scots aren't that keen on being called British.
Gaudd 1 year ago
No, you're not that keen on being called British, I, for one am, so don't impose your Nationalism on other scots! We have a great history of fighting in the British army in all the great wars which many Scots are proud!
TheLordrochester 1 year ago 3
these are scotish soldiers
TheCherokeeboy 2 years ago
BRITISH
stephenmgodfrey 2 years ago 3
@TheCherokeeboy
I dont know if they're all Scottish but they definately are all British.
NaMgKCa 2 years ago
yeh and english ,welsh and northern irish dumbass hence british forces most yanks hate to know that because the brits are all posh in there eye's well there wrong lol
cambershots 1 year ago
wow... a reinactment...
KrazyAznPig 2 years ago
all the allied nations did their part to win ww2 including britain and u, the british didtheir part by making their stand during the battle of britain, if britain did not won the battle of britain, hitler might have taken the whole world and america did their part too by dropping the atomic bomb , because if the atomic bomb was not dropped, the invasion of japan would cost the allies hundred thousands of cassualties.
erv46 2 years ago
I dno who you are whether Brit or yank, but you are aware the brits did the same things Yanks did plus 3 yrs more fighting... Think of the fighting before dunkirk then all the commando fighting in europe before d day and all the fighting in africa and italy etc. Brits are so uncredited for all they did becoz the yanks obviously take the glory for stepping in late.
RetardedPickle 2 years ago 6
Battle in Tobruk? Battle in Guadalcanal? Operation Garden-Market? Small local fight, speak soldiers of USSR. We loose more people then your both army.
krait77 2 years ago 2
Don't want to be mean, but thats because your army was SHIT. You made em charge into lines of well placed and covered gemans soldiers and tanks ffs. Not trying to base all this on what i see in movies becoz i know you guys did brilliantly to counterattack and send them on their way back to Berlin but still, you lost many cos u werent trained properly etc
RetardedPickle 2 years ago
@RetardedPickle Yep, great british army have 1100 tanks against 200 german tanks in Libia. At the end of battle Rommel have 148 tanks, british army have less then 400... Mmm? Good training and genius HQ??? Are you really think so? Learn real History, try to read some books, it can help
krait77 10 months ago
@krait77 USA tanks for ya not tht well made
GGMacarthur 10 months ago
@krait77 Sounds like the Germans bit off more than they could chew. What with Russia and all.
zipsrule 1 month ago
Dying in huge numbers isnt generally regarded as tactical brilliance mate.
Saxe333 2 years ago
@krait77 You must have been really badly lead then.
drunkest100 10 months ago
Lol true.
Tsagia 2 years ago
The uniforms are from the 1750's french and indian war.
Huzzah for the highlanders!!
Highlander1758 3 years ago 5
these look like late 16 hundreds early 17 hundred uniforms...correct me if im wrong
billboi92 3 years ago 3
Man.. I would love to visit these on site reenactments!
Bandeto 3 years ago
were allies! and great allies at that so stop fighting between eachother, Britain wouldnt have defeated Germany but we held our own and would of continued to do so, we was giving Axis forces big problems in Africa, RAF Bomber command started nightly air raids on the german heartland, Germans were starting to see they werent invincible, we resisted and tackled their U-boats, all in all we did bloody well, we showed Germany that they can be fought effectively, America kicked that into action
verification2000 3 years ago
also
pacific campaign; British and commonwealth troops comprised a large part of japans enemy, British, Irish, Australian, Indian, Chinese, New Zealand. how can u say america defeated them single handed? its ridiculous, neither was capable of winning without the help of eachother, America was more powerful, they were a sleeping superpower, Britain is a much smaller country with a far smaller population, but look at wat we achieved against far superior numbers!!!
verification2000 3 years ago 10
@verification2000 Your Forgetting Russia too, they were on Japan's doorstep and had some brutal battle's too, The American's take credit for everything!
LolFishFail 1 year ago
that is true, we basically defeated Japan by ourselves while helping Britain fight Germany. And even before we declared war in 41 we were helping Britain since 1939 with money and supplies due to the lend lease act. If Britain didnt have the financial help of the US in 1939-40 the outcome could have been different during the Battle of Britain
VitaminJ4029 3 years ago
Thats an unfair comment, The USA couldnt of won world war 2 without Britain
1. we contributed vast man power to the campaign, D-Day; 84,000 of the 156,000 troops deployed for the assault were british, 80% of the allied naval force deployed was British, and 50% of the air armada was British RAF.
2. Market Garden; 10,000 paratroopers of the 34,000 airborne troops were brits. also all of codename "garden" were british(the armoured element)
verification2000 3 years ago 10
@verification2000 True, but you must have forgotten that the US supplied thousands of weapons, food rations, uniforms and other supplies to the British when they were attacked by Germany. A US base in Hawaii was attacked which is why the US joined the war but the only reason we were really in Germany was to help out the British, not the other way around. The British hardly helped the US in the war they were actually fighting, in the pacific.
KrW6165 1 year ago
@KrW6165
Dude...Did you even read his comment?
And they didn't supply as much as you said they did...It was commonwealth countries like Canada and Australia that did all the suppliying
"pacific campaign; British and commonwealth troops comprised a large part of japans enemy, British, Irish, Australian, Indian, Chinese, New Zealand. how can u say america defeated them single handed?"
spudnick3490 1 year ago
@verification2000 and if britain would have fallen the allies would have needed to do a d-day landing on britain AND france without the help of britain
cubosensaj 6 months ago
Without the Americans In world war two, the war would have been drawn out much longer. With potentialy millions more casualties. Remeber in 1942 America was the supreme power, where as the British Empire began to decay in about 1900. Those are facts, not opinions - I'm not saying Americans are better than British or visa versa.
pidgey101 3 years ago
great video like the pipes.god bless scotland
dougalhector 3 years ago
not exactly.... Britain was faced with many logistical problems in the colonies, the terrain alone proved unfit for european style battles... Had the americans not cried for help from the french, you would all have english accents today...sorry its true, britain was slappin that american ass.
PlayTronicz 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
we beat your british asses twice and saved your ass in ww2 and now america is the only super power left. america had british beat anyways before the french helped.
lopido 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Revolutionary War: Britian-30,000,000 People VS USA-3,ooo,ooo. Royal Navy VS No Navy. US allies 10,ooo French troops vs 30,ooo hessians, woodland indians, loyalst formations. Worlds largest empire vs a new Republic. Results- a decisive US victory that stunned the world!
DPKFOUR7 3 years ago
lol typical american going over the top that result didnt stun the world, Britain new what would happen if they didnt commit more troops but after continuing the fight while studying the shipping profits they decided america wasnt worth the man power / cost for the resources it was bringing in.
especialy when much greater civilisations were causing bother e.g. spain and france
SirDodds 3 years ago
I like these uniforms redcoats -very impresive today im happy that now exist many historical clubs that reconstructed historrical battles in europe(mainly napoleonic era) and a can march and fight for one of these clubs (like austrian Grenadiren 1798 uniform :) in central europe-Czech repulic,Poland,Austria,Hungary (battle of Austerlitz,Hollabrun,Nysse)if you want some info about it please write the message to me
Araman84 3 years ago
Agreed, Briznanoth.
dragoons9009 3 years ago
this was one of the best events i had participated in...and, the 15th is in it for almost the entire first two minutes.
jonnyherb2000 3 years ago
USA - country without history....
Kicudg 3 years ago 2
Sir, I suggest you repeat the following grades: 1-12. It is the country's diversity which has defined their history.
Briznanoth 3 years ago
Usa is not even 300 years old how much history could we have. the only history usa has is kicking everyone's ass in wars
lopido 3 years ago
300 years is pathetic. Just think, there is no such thing as a true American. Your heritage is probably European. Hey, it could even be British. Also, you speak English. Yup, our language. So please, refrain from the insults. That's all I ever here from Yanks. Insults, insults, insults. I have shoe laces older than your country.
WestCountryCider 3 years ago 4
still saved your ass's in ww2
lopido 3 years ago
u saved fuck all in ww2
battle of britain happened germanys invasion failed terribly then u fuck tards jumped on the band wagon becoz he you noticed germany were on the back foot not been able to invade britain.
not jsut in ww2 the proof is all over you americans havnt weon a actual war yet without help.
SirDodds 3 years ago 4
lend lease act moron, also britian could never have beaten germany by itself
lopido 3 years ago
yeh u sold weapons to germany also fool.
maybe we couldnt have took on germany on our own after all the counries they took, but thats only becoz we were in ww1 and then had to suffer ww2 ALONE until u cowards decided to jump in once germanys invasion of the final outpost of the UK was a total mess.
if we didnt destory all german hopes of invading britain u would of never came and "saved us" as you retards put it.
SirDodds 3 years ago
cowards rofl. we helped beat germany while fighting japan by our selves. Do u now how many shermans we produced between 42-45. 50,000 TANKS.
lopido 3 years ago
I'd like for you to speak to any American veteran who fought in Europe or Japan and call them a coward to their faces. What have you done with your life? Sit behind a keyboard and call others cowards. Do you honestly think that Britain alone could have mustered the strength to ever create an offensive against Germany without our help. Get off your high horse and open a History book.
flyboy4692 3 years ago
i didnt say britain did it all on ther own u daft twat, comment when u read or at least understand what i put.
america had a tiny role in the end but as per usual u prats like to pretend u saved the world on your own. if it wasnt for uk putting germany on the defensive in the battle of britain america would of continued to hide.
and everyone no's it.
SirDodds 3 years ago 3
YOU? No. Hitler was put on the defensive by the Soviets. He couldn't take Britain by air so he turned his attenton to the Eastern Front. I obviously can't argue this with you because you're too engrossed by stereotypes about Americans that you skew even historical facts.
Make no mistake Britain did their part. I do not disrespect British veterans the way you disrespect American ones but to think that Britain did all the work was preposterous.
flyboy4692 3 years ago
i`m sure that big statue in new york came from another country that helped you get independence?
symes1878 3 years ago
Yep, us rebel colonists, with the help of the French who were weakened still from their defeat in the 7 Years War, defeated the most powerful military in the world.
flyboy4692 3 years ago
"I have shoe laces older than your country."
I know the economy is bad, but DAMN!!
SCE2AUX 3 years ago
u mean losing every war it started and getting help then trying to steal the glory from the rest it jumped into halfway threw
SirDodds 3 years ago 2
Thanks for this GREAT video!
God Bless the UK & the USA!
frphilipmullen 3 years ago 4
Great vid. - More like this please.
truebot 3 years ago
Interesting.. So what period is this?
honeyroastpenut 4 years ago
This is from the reenacted siege of Fort William Henry, in New York. The original event took place in August of 1757, and this was from the 250th anniversary last year.
Hakerh 4 years ago
ah cool, thanks
honeyroastpenut 4 years ago
@honeyroastpenut Seven Years War.
zipsrule 1 month ago
Now these guys actually know how to march with the beat.
riblet15 4 years ago
lot of things, and If I didn't you dickhead? what would you do then? that comment is from 2 weeks so keep your ass shut, dickhead!
Allblack25 4 years ago
well its good to know you have such a large vocabulary
lardmonk 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
aaagh! Its not to hear that fuckin music!!
and fuck all da redcoats, they are just gaycoats!
Allblack25 4 years ago
Not you again, 'aint you got sommat else to do bucket head?
clydewell 4 years ago 2
Go piss off you bloody fuck.
erikarabin8924 4 years ago
only true idiots would say this
columnsx 4 years ago
There is the Royal Canadian Nova Scotia Grendiers and the Fort Henry Foot Guards of Canada.
kepiblanc2007 4 years ago 2
Thanks; I wasn't sure which groups I was looking at (I'm naval, myself).
Hakerh 4 years ago
you mean the ones with the polyester uniforms and ww2 drill?
jonnyherb2000 3 years ago
nice god save the king fuck the queen
topmarkes 4 years ago
hey i'm in this... the highland corporal
xxmccloud 4 years ago 2
God Save the King!
rangergirl56m 4 years ago 4
lol
MaplePatrol 4 years ago