а не кажется всем, что калаш лучше только потому что он русский, всё таки наше. эМка в меру надёжная, ак уступает ей по неполной разборке, а то что м-16 клинила во вьетнаме - это результат человеческой жадности, так как использовали в патронах другой порох, не предусмотренный тем стволом, так как он образовывалось большое кол-во нагара. ЗЫ:M16 способны вообще без чистки сделать самое меньшее 1500-2000 выстрелов (это, напомню, 50-60 магазинов), сохраняя к концу стрельб работоспособность.
АК-47 и АК-74 - лучшие автоматы. Эти автоматы дешёвые, надёжные, простые в использовании. Я знаю я лично служил в армии с АК-74 мне он был и точным и мощным и надёжным и ещё мне не надо этой пластиковой М16 я знаю что на АК АЕК и АН - лучше чем они.
Всеми руками за Калаш! но то что он стены прошибает (@raskukan) эт бред! 5.45 уходит в рикошет только так!Когда был 7.62 пробивная способность была выше!Досих пор понять немогу зачем потянулись за натовцами?
@MrMabyta Согласен что при попадении в голое тело у 5.45 последствия тяжелее(такая хитрая альтернатива дум-дум)Но во Вьетнаме мы(я) предпочитали пользоваться 7.62.При стрельбе бамбуковые стволы не мешают!Пуля проходит без отклонения!
@ABAKAN9 мэн, тогда ак-47 надо сравнивать с г3 какой или фн фал. на крайний случай ауг. а вот м4(м16) надо сравнивать с ак-74 и так далее (там калибр 5,45 и 5,56)
@9Moonligh9 your a fucking idiot who hasn't held or shot either. Shut the fuck up you clueless fucking idiot I own several variants of both. Christ such a strong opinion from someone with absolutely no experience....fucking tool
M16 full shit, who would not say that M is good. The whole world knows that the best weapon AK47 in the world, loved AK never fails and will not betray!
Калаш в стрельбе одиночными выстрелами точнее чем М16, а в стрельбе очередями проигрывает не много. Вот мне как войну нужна точность стрельбы в принципе, А насколько нужна мне точность стрельбы очередями? Меня рассеивание выстрелов калаша при стрельбе очередями устраивает - считаю что калаш достаточно точен в стрельбе очередями.
Из М16 проще целиться. Но высокие прицельные приспособления делают стрелка отличной мишенью. Потому как сильно возвышается тупая башка взявшая М16. А мне ПоХУЙ я с кашом
Уважаемый Есть действительно огромное количество вариаций и модификаций, автомат очень хорош прост и дешев в производстве, очень надежен но его меткость всегда оставляла желать лучшего. и например себе я его купил только как приятные воспоминания но для точной стрельбы использую другие экземпляры. Ага я пишу это пытаясь сделать так, что бы люди которые не понимают ничего в теме меньше писали и увеличивали уровень своих знаний дабы потом с ними было интересно.
Кроме этого калаш проще чистить. М16 имеет много мелких деталей (которые могут и потеряться в полевых условиях на всегда). В принципе калаш можно и не чистить вообще потому что ему ПО ХУЙ на все. М16 чистить нужно - иначе заклинит.
Магазин калаша на 30 патронов, а в М16 на 20. Снаряжать магазин калаша на много проще.
Калаш не боится падений, а М16 очень боится к примеру, если уронить М16 на магазин с высоты 1 метр, то он не станет стрелять, а калашу ПО ХУЮ хоть с 3-х силой бросай его как угодно.
Из М16 в принципе хорошая винтовка (для тира), но может заклинить вовремя дождя, при незначительном загрязнении (по меркам калаша). Несколько часов похода по лесу и такие засоры в М16 будут.
Дело еще в том что в бою нет возможности стоять и расстреливать гордо противника. Потому что в тебя попадут легко. Тогда надо лечь. А выбирать место где для тебя постелили коврик времени нет. Поэтому ляжешь обязательно и в снег и в грязь куда угодно - что бы остаться в живых - Я выберу калаш. Ему всё поХУЙ
это не совсем одно и то же. Их нельзя сравнивать. Калаш более эффективет в ближнем бою, особенно в зданиях. Даже штатовские группы захвата ими вооружают, а если противник на большом расстоянии (метров сто например), то "эмка" эффективнее, ей прицельный огонь легче вести
@OrgazmOperator собственно о том и речь, только кто реально стрелял из них может сравнивать. Я вообще за автоматические винтовки, мне они как-то больше по душе. Я так и не понял как можно вести прецеьный огонь из калаша оцередями, я с сорока метров набросал дырок в полтора метра диаметром на магазин (стоя) :))))) а одиночками отлично стреляет, в городском бое и на дистанции до 150м отличная вещь (более 150 м не пробовал)!
@kyoshiroma glad we have your approval because your the leading authority on how every single person in the U.S. acts....every single person ....and were ever your from is so way way better....elitist prick....we have people like you here too we call them hipster douche bags.
I do not understand the ridiculous and stubborn American pride. Nobody says that the M16 is bad, in fact is ok is a very good gun, but what all the whole world repeat is that the AK47 is much better. It is so hard to accept? hahahah xD
@Multishove you have now earned yourself 0 credibility....your and elitist arrogant ass. Go get drink by rectaly consuming vodka then beat your wife and bribe your crooked cops....ooo stereotypes are fun.
1st why is this not in english ... or have english captions , and people m16 is used as a persision rifle the ak is used as a machine gun ... the fire selector switch is tells it all , ak is safe , fully auto , semi auto , m16 is safe , semi , 3shot burst , the ak is best at close range but the m16 is better at range ... they both are good for which ever job you need to do
@MaxZxCs какой винтовки- Stg 44? может лучше чем, что-либо говорить углубишься в детали и тогда поймешь, что общего у них лишь отдаленное сходство? Да и судя из коммента вы ни одного из автоматов в глаза не видели ни М16 ни АК.
@vkigo3 Stg44 fired a 7.92mm round which was a compromise between the long 8mm mauser and short 9mm pistol round (used in MP40). Sturmgewehr (STG) translated to English means Storm Rifle, and is not a submachine gun, Stg44 is recognised as the first ever assault rifle. The rifle is more accurate than Mp40, less accurate than the Mauser 98K but has the rapid fire capability of a submachine gun.
@Nikitos253 accuracy, weight. battery of operation, balance, ergonomics, recoil managment, modularity, aftermarket options, caliber options...the list goes on. the AR15 is a supirior weapon in all of these aspects. that is FACT
@Nikitos253 you have no experiance with the AR at all. you dont even have to keep it clean, just keep it lubed and replace parts as they go through their life cycle and the AR is an extremely reliable weapon with many major advantages over the AK. keep your ignorance to yourself.
Lol yeah 5.56 tends to fragment at the cannelure here the jacket is thinnest over 2500fps depending on the gr. 5.45 has that air pocket under the jacket that deforms te bullet once it strikes something.
Colt also states that ATEC's testers were unfamiliar with the M4s' 3-round burst configuration which, depending on the position of the cam, will sometimes fire 1 round or a 2-round burst before firing a 3-round burst. This unfamiliarity, said Colt, led to single rounds and 2-round bursts being counted as stoppages. With the exception of the M4s, all other weapons tested were fully automatic with no 3-round burst provision. Further, Colt points out that
So how was this test conducted? What was the fps of the round hitting the "gel" which will never act like flesh and bone.close, maybe if calibrated right but the human body/clothing are different from a brick of gel. What ammo? I have confidence the mk318 mod 0 or any other OTM bullet or bonded match bullet would expand or fragment at the cannelure at the right fps.
@SSgt24thMEU 5.56 will kill someone quicker and with more propability than 5.45, thats true. At 200 yards the difference in drop is barely 2 inches, at 500 its about 10. thats not very much. Both are great rifles, thats why they are so common.
Honestly the first few times fired a 5.45x39 ak variant on semi auto it felt like a .22 lr. It has very little recoil. Never tried on full auto tho. I enjoy both my AR and my Ak variant. I couldn't bring myself to get one in 5.45x39 tho so my experience with that is with a friends. In smaller round ill take my AR for shtf I'll take what's closest but AR parts are plentiful here so I'd rather have that.
АК-47, АК-74, это самые лучшие в мире автоматы, им весь мир пользуется, а м16 только для городских боёв где нет пыли, грязи и воды, а АК в любых условиях работает
ballistics are ALMOST the same, but the 5.45x39 tends to tumble and fragment more than the 5.56x45. With the AK-74...i mean i've fired those things one handed literally. The recoil is almost non-existant. If it came to a swat team, or some sort of police/urban situation where the weapons were stored in an armory till they were needed m16 is the right choice. But a true "battle rifle" is the AK platform, and there's no debating that. It's a foot soldier's weapon.
the external ballist for the AK-74 are much better due to a longer and better balanced projectile.
this is even truer when compared to ahort barelled weapon like the M4 carabine
the internal balistic, at leat for the N6 and and N10 5.45 relies on tumbling quickly and they usually not expend/fragments. some form of expention migh occur for the N22 and N24 when the core rip the jacket
Expention is the main mean of wounding for the SS109/m855 is
both suck i'd chose the aug reliable as the ak74 with a 6.8 chabering more powrful than an ak47 and more acurate ligher than both and shorter for no acuracy reduction
@TVALATIN а может быть есть куча аналогов калашникова? ведь именно АК-47 стал первой в мире полноценной штурмовой винтовкой. Не считая STG-44 немецкого, но он выпускался малыми партиями. И только потом появилась эмка. в 60-х годах. И именно советского вторжения боялись соседи, что в один далеко не прекрасный миг полезут наши БМПшки и из них появятся солдаты с АК. мда... потом Вьетнам, Аыганистан, Чечня. И везде АК был гораздо эффективней американки.
@raskukan Долбоеб,он самый надежный и простой,и это главное,ты на "лучшие"аналоги хоть что навешай,пусть суперточность будет и скорострельность,но попробуй кинь в грязь ,утопи в песке, выстрели подряд 3 обоймы в режимеРЕАЛЬНОГО боя ,а не не на показушных видеосьемках где рекламируют эти "лучшие",и поймешь-почему весь мир использует АК.Он тебя не подведет ни на крайнем севере ни в жаркой пустыне,ни в джунглях,ни в городских условиях,где он бетонные стены прошивает влегкую.спи бля,короче
@romrus100 Вот мне все нравится, просто все время хочется добавить слово "был".
я просто рекомендую обратить внимание на современные аналоги, а не устраивать спор по поводу стариков. у кого когда-то что то было лучше. АК очень хорош в определенных моментах как и М16. А Ваши заявления уважаемый говорят только о том что Вы не очень в теме, или просто не имеете возможности знакомиться с новыми видами.
@romrus100 Весь мир? АК используют нищие африканские и южноамериканские нигры и ближневосточные бомжи-ахметы, у кототорых денег нет на что-либо получше. Весь мир использует FN FAL и HK G3, блять, во-первых. Во-вторых, M16A3 с RIS на манер M16A4 уделает по всем параметрам боевых характеристик АК-74М, кроме надёжности, особенно если к ней прицепить боевую оптику вроде ACOG и зарядить 5.56×45mm M855A1. Она покажет КАЛашу лучшую кучность при больших скорострельности, бронебойности и раневом канале
@NdzDJ Alright for one, I dont have an xbox or a ps3 to play cod on so thats that, but your arguments dont have any substance! Range is not the same, just becuase it uses a similiar round does not mean that it has the same range. The M-16 is a rifle, while the Ak-74 is a carbine. And i said the reliablity of the AK-74 is better than the 16, so listen next time.
@NdzDJ I still think you're just playing with words, but it's a bullpup design. The weight is always going to be in the back. Bullpups have more advantages than negatives though, so I have no problem with it.
@NdzDJ Didn't we already go through this? I proved the SA80 is lighter than the M16. But yes, it is a bit too heavy for a bullpup, but the FN F2000 is lighter, and that was the issue at hand.
@NdzDJ I dono, I read some reviews and all of them were extremely positive. It's not that heavy, the SA80 weighs more. It's heavier than the Tavor though.
@NdzDJ wrong, the ak74 has almost as much rcoil as an ak-47, partly becuase it is of the same design, the M-16 has much less recoil, ak-74 is more reliable than the m-16, but the m-16 is a very reliable weapon, save the a1 version, which was a peice of shit. m-16 is a much more accurate weapon that the ak-74, and with a few modifications, the m-16 can function as a sniper rifle. M-16 has better range as well, than the ak-74 which is considered a carbine.
@NdzDJ Plastic gets an unfair rap because most people associate it with cheap products. There are many different kinds of plastics that are high quality and extremely durable. I see nothing wrong with a gun that has all non-essential parts made out of plastic. Really, metal just weighs the thing down, and can even have rust issues which plastics do not suffer from. If you can replace as many parts with lighter plastic parts, I see no reason not to.
@NdzDJ Uhh the L85A2 weighs as less than the M16. I never heard of any major jamming problems from the FN F2000. All reports I've read have said that it's very reliable.
@NdzDJ The M16 is also 50 years old. Even the AK74 is going to be replaced by the AK-200. But honestly there are better rifles out there right now. The Tavor, the FAMAS, the FN F2000, the L85A2, all of these rifles are better than either the M16 or the AK74, America is just holding on to the M-16/M4 because the guys who are in charge of weapon procurement have lucrative deals with Colt. The LSAT program is the only glimmer of hope of finally replacing the M16.
@NdzDJ I dont need to check some idiots videos on Youtube, especially cokemans dumb ass, I OWN them both. I shoot them allot, the AR has less recoil because of the way the buffer tube is designed and how the stock doesn't hinge from the recoil. Its easier to keep on target and allow for faster follow up shots. The 74 is a nice gun, its has almost no recoil compared to the 47, but its not as easy on the shoulder and an AR. That's a fact.
@NdzDJ That's wrong actually the Ak-74 has more recoil than the m16, thats because of the way the bolt is not center of gravity back to the butt stock. Where as the m16 is a straight shot all the way back.
m16 is great accuracy and power is good but in terms of reliability it is downfall u need to keep a good maintenance in this gun so it wont get jammed, ak-47 on the other hand is so-so in accuracy but in fire power it is great and reliability is pretty good, it will still fire even if run by Humvee, soak in water, and buried in sand it still works.
@Dylan10188 its not as strong as a sniper rifle. 7.62 is a caliber not a sniper round.... a ak is only good out to around 300 yards not any were near as far as a snipers round shoud go. the 39 in 7.62x39 means the caseing of the round is 39mm long not times... a m16s 5.56 is good out to 1000 yards. aks are not an accurate gun its a fire in that general direction gun. a m16 is a rifle that is very accurate. aks are very reliable not a snipers weapon.
@Dylan10188 Yeah try again kid, 7.62x39 is no wear near as powerful as a sniper round. The US military uses the 7.62x51 and the former Soviet republics use 7.62x54r as their "sniper rounds". The 7.62x39 is an intermediate round, in the same class as the 5.56 or 5.45.
@fn1046 okay i was wrong what i met to say was almost strong as a sniper... but can you not call me a kid ass hole i bet you have no life and still live with your mom and dad so.... o ya and if you are in the "MILITARY" lol i bet you got shot by a kalashnikov.. o wait you would be dead hahahahahhaha
@Dylan10188 Look dude I wasn't trying to insult you, by calling you "kid", i call everyone kid I ment no disrespect. But you're still wrong a 7.62x51 the round used in the M40 and M24 sniper rifles, is more power than the 7.62 soviet by ft lb in almost every grain. I love the 7.62 soviet and my ak is probably the rifle i shot the most, but love it for what it is an intermediate rifle round.
@Melder92 depends on the type of firearm. Dedicated machineguns and anti-personell snipers should use the 7.62. but assault rifles the 5.56 is the best choice, because altough it doesnt have as much range or stopping power then the 7.62, it has greater killing power(different from stopping power) and more accuracy due to the kick. and with snipers now adays are slowly replacing the 7.62 in favor of 50. BMG anti-material rifles, even some using 20mm! in short, urban combat, youll want the 5.56
IMO the 5.56 is a piece of shit. I would use 7.62*39, 6.5 Grendel, or 6.8 Remington SPC instead. The 5.56 bullet is too light and can break easily when it hits something in range up to 100-150meters. Thats a huge loss of energy and damage. 6.5 and 6.8 are favourited by me.
No it´s still a piece of shit. Winds will blow the bullet away, and it loses speed in the air very fast, you doesn´t need much armor, etc. And bullet breaks BEFORE wounding the target, it will break on impact. Assaultrifles should be usefull under bad weather conditions like strong wind. 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 Rem SPC, 7.62*39 and 7.62*51 NATO can spin in a target too, leaving a peranent wound channel up to 20mm. Ask the troops in afghanistan, most are using the 7.62 instead 5.56
@Melder92 hell a 50.cal will blow with wind. and its not a sniper, it doesnt need to maintain speed for an extended period. and it usually doesnt break on impact. llike i would take an M16 over an AKM anyday. even the soviets are using a round smaller then the 5.56 round. my point. 7.62 isnt a good assault rifle round, but its amazing in MGs. Snipers, youll want the 50.BMG(if anti-material). the smaller the gun, the smaller the round should be
@AhhizGodzilla He's saying the projectile because it's so light is more easily influenced by the wind. A heavier projectile won't be as influenced by the wind. The Soviets replaced the 7.62x39 true, but Spetsnaz units still use the 7.62x39 because it's better against barriers, and for more lethality perhaps. I think the 7.62 is great for assault rifles. A lot of reports suggest the 5.56x45 has questionable lethality.
@esh325 Really? ive read alot that says that while the 7.62 has more stopping power, the 5.56 is more lethal. plus u dont really have the issue of alot of recoil, so u can put more rounds on target, and if u hit a vital area, u dont really need a larger projectile.
ak owns m16 skinny tight ass
lezeus 4 days ago
АК говно, как и все российское оружие
govnotank 1 week ago
@govnotank Гандон, вали отсюда.
TemirHunter 1 week ago
@MrAipot huh?
elox02 1 week ago
китайцы еб*аные
rushantreiser 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
АК 74-THE BEST!
gulshato4ka 2 weeks ago
а не кажется всем, что калаш лучше только потому что он русский, всё таки наше. эМка в меру надёжная, ак уступает ей по неполной разборке, а то что м-16 клинила во вьетнаме - это результат человеческой жадности, так как использовали в патронах другой порох, не предусмотренный тем стволом, так как он образовывалось большое кол-во нагара. ЗЫ:M16 способны вообще без чистки сделать самое меньшее 1500-2000 выстрелов (это, напомню, 50-60 магазинов), сохраняя к концу стрельб работоспособность.
MrMabyta 2 weeks ago
Mikhail Kalashnikov the best
SgtElvir 2 weeks ago 12
АК 74-THE BEST!
russian3300 3 weeks ago 2
у них разные части и детали. и тем более не на основе, а в противодействие, они разные тупица
sprite1290 3 weeks ago
а вы знаете, что АК-47 был разработан на основе трофейного SturmGewer 44?
RusskyChelovek 3 weeks ago
@RusskyChelovek ты же Русский человек!
russian3300 3 weeks ago
@russian3300 да, но не отрицать же из-за этого правды
RusskyChelovek 3 weeks ago
@RusskyChelovek ты не прав... ты судишь только по тому, что внешне они похожи, на самом деле АК имеет много как внешних так и внутренних различий...
То, что ты говоришь, не больше как тупой миф тупого школяра - задрота...
отдыхай!
MrAipot 1 week ago
Hey Top comment in Russian! I dont understand a singleword but im gonna upvote anyways because russians know what they say bout aks ;D
DERBierkasten 4 weeks ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
автомат калашникова говно, калашников от слова кал - говно
govnotank 4 weeks ago
@govnotank да ты патриот, однако
RusskyChelovek 3 weeks ago
@govnotank ты заебал ублюдок!ты чего хорошего сделал в жизни?только и умеешь в комментах срать задрот малолетний!
russian3300 3 weeks ago
Конструкторы М-16 идите работать на ювелирный завод.
ExMachiner 4 weeks ago 3
thats why they never compare m16's to 74's
only to ak 47's, cause they don't have a chance!!!
SnowBroProductions 1 month ago
АК-47 и АК-74 - лучшие автоматы. Эти автоматы дешёвые, надёжные, простые в использовании. Я знаю я лично служил в армии с АК-74 мне он был и точным и мощным и надёжным и ещё мне не надо этой пластиковой М16 я знаю что на АК АЕК и АН - лучше чем они.
BOBAN123145464 1 month ago 3
@BOBAN123145464 говно все твои ак
govnotank 4 weeks ago
@govnotank иди отсюда америкос сраный
BOBAN123145464 1 week ago
Всеми руками за Калаш! но то что он стены прошибает (@raskukan) эт бред! 5.45 уходит в рикошет только так!Когда был 7.62 пробивная способность была выше!Досих пор понять немогу зачем потянулись за натовцами?
ABAKAN9 1 month ago
@ABAKAN9 зато пуля калибра 5,45 кувыркается при попадании в тело и грубо говоря наматывает кишки . да и легче она будет
MrMabyta 2 weeks ago
@MrMabyta Согласен что при попадении в голое тело у 5.45 последствия тяжелее(такая хитрая альтернатива дум-дум)Но во Вьетнаме мы(я) предпочитали пользоваться 7.62.При стрельбе бамбуковые стволы не мешают!Пуля проходит без отклонения!
ABAKAN9 2 weeks ago
@ABAKAN9 мэн, тогда ак-47 надо сравнивать с г3 какой или фн фал. на крайний случай ауг. а вот м4(м16) надо сравнивать с ак-74 и так далее (там калибр 5,45 и 5,56)
MrMabyta 2 weeks ago
Hey Russians- just saying the AK is a better weapon doesn't make it so.
menckencynic 1 month ago
эмочка кагбутто плостмассовая
89682720509 1 month ago
@9Moonligh9 your a fucking idiot who hasn't held or shot either. Shut the fuck up you clueless fucking idiot I own several variants of both. Christ such a strong opinion from someone with absolutely no experience....fucking tool
elox02 1 month ago
@elox02 вот ты долбаеб!!!
MrAipot 1 week ago
M16 full shit, who would not say that M is good. The whole world knows that the best weapon AK47 in the world, loved AK never fails and will not betray!
9Moonligh9 1 month ago
@9Moonligh9 you are one ignorant shit. keep sucking on the commie propaganda cock baby bitch
HunterKiller308 1 month ago
russian comment overload...
TensionAirsoft 1 month ago
Короче народ русский не парьтесь Калаш круче М16 на много.
Ему конкуренцию составляют только другие Российские автоматы АЕК и АН.
V219R 1 month ago
Калаш в стрельбе одиночными выстрелами точнее чем М16, а в стрельбе очередями проигрывает не много. Вот мне как войну нужна точность стрельбы в принципе, А насколько нужна мне точность стрельбы очередями? Меня рассеивание выстрелов калаша при стрельбе очередями устраивает - считаю что калаш достаточно точен в стрельбе очередями.
Из М16 проще целиться. Но высокие прицельные приспособления делают стрелка отличной мишенью. Потому как сильно возвышается тупая башка взявшая М16. А мне ПоХУЙ я с кашом
V219R 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Уважаемый Есть действительно огромное количество вариаций и модификаций, автомат очень хорош прост и дешев в производстве, очень надежен но его меткость всегда оставляла желать лучшего. и например себе я его купил только как приятные воспоминания но для точной стрельбы использую другие экземпляры. Ага я пишу это пытаясь сделать так, что бы люди которые не понимают ничего в теме меньше писали и увеличивали уровень своих знаний дабы потом с ними было интересно.
Кстати какую м16 Вы держали вруках?
Cre8tt 1 month ago
Кроме этого калаш проще чистить. М16 имеет много мелких деталей (которые могут и потеряться в полевых условиях на всегда). В принципе калаш можно и не чистить вообще потому что ему ПО ХУЙ на все. М16 чистить нужно - иначе заклинит.
Магазин калаша на 30 патронов, а в М16 на 20. Снаряжать магазин калаша на много проще.
Калаш не боится падений, а М16 очень боится к примеру, если уронить М16 на магазин с высоты 1 метр, то он не станет стрелять, а калашу ПО ХУЮ хоть с 3-х силой бросай его как угодно.
V219R 1 month ago
@V219R В продаже есть магазины от 10 до 100 патронов
Cre8tt 1 month ago
Из М16 в принципе хорошая винтовка (для тира), но может заклинить вовремя дождя, при незначительном загрязнении (по меркам калаша). Несколько часов похода по лесу и такие засоры в М16 будут.
Дело еще в том что в бою нет возможности стоять и расстреливать гордо противника. Потому что в тебя попадут легко. Тогда надо лечь. А выбирать место где для тебя постелили коврик времени нет. Поэтому ляжешь обязательно и в снег и в грязь куда угодно - что бы остаться в живых - Я выберу калаш. Ему всё поХУЙ
V219R 1 month ago
@chexkyalchan тебя на войне будут расстреливать ,а ты будешь гордо стоять и не ляжешь на землю или в песок или в лужу? бред ,сынок иди спать.
romrus100 1 month ago
это не совсем одно и то же. Их нельзя сравнивать. Калаш более эффективет в ближнем бою, особенно в зданиях. Даже штатовские группы захвата ими вооружают, а если противник на большом расстоянии (метров сто например), то "эмка" эффективнее, ей прицельный огонь легче вести
З. Ы. Стрелял и из того и из другого
OrgazmOperator 1 month ago
@OrgazmOperator собственно о том и речь, только кто реально стрелял из них может сравнивать. Я вообще за автоматические винтовки, мне они как-то больше по душе. Я так и не понял как можно вести прецеьный огонь из калаша оцередями, я с сорока метров набросал дырок в полтора метра диаметром на магазин (стоя) :))))) а одиночками отлично стреляет, в городском бое и на дистанции до 150м отличная вещь (более 150 м не пробовал)!
carbonclanrus 1 month ago
АК-74? Совсем вообще не надо таких видео как фильм "бункер"
aljan2000 1 month ago
Сволочина какой почему на японском языке?!
aljan2000 1 month ago
Совершенно верно м 4 а 1 шняга лучше ак нет аналоги супер
IlyxakRot2011 1 month ago
калаш сделан для войны, а м16 больше подходит для спецслужб...
sexymelonololo 1 month ago
Muahahaha wo haben die denn diese alte M16A1 aus'm Dschungel geholt?? Sieht i'wie scheisse aus...
Helvetier1 2 months ago
ak-47 Nomnogo krasivee 4em M16!!!
Ka3aknbIH 2 months ago
m16a1 - говно сырое... m16a3 получше будет
stalkerrembo 2 months ago
@kyoshiroma glad we have your approval because your the leading authority on how every single person in the U.S. acts....every single person ....and were ever your from is so way way better....elitist prick....we have people like you here too we call them hipster douche bags.
elox02 2 months ago
i don't care which one is better, as long as i don't have one pointing at me!
rod3067 2 months ago
that's not an A1, the forward assist function was introduced with the A2
ccowap15 2 months ago
I do not understand the ridiculous and stubborn American pride. Nobody says that the M16 is bad, in fact is ok is a very good gun, but what all the whole world repeat is that the AK47 is much better. It is so hard to accept? hahahah xD
kyoshiroma 2 months ago
м16 точное ак47 убойное
aer3332 2 months ago
English please!
deltaA320 2 months ago
@Multishove you have now earned yourself 0 credibility....your and elitist arrogant ass. Go get drink by rectaly consuming vodka then beat your wife and bribe your crooked cops....ooo stereotypes are fun.
elox02 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yuor M16 sukc! you fat end lazy morans!
Russia kick ass your all amerikan lozers!
AK 74, AK 103, VSS vintorez, SVD, RPG, Topol M!
this ar reali weapons! your weapons not risist ASS!
It yor gamburger, end sit stil! and not to anger Russian
Для Русских! МЫ лучшие и наше оружие самое лучшее в мире и если будет война с Америкой, ох мы и дадим им пизды!=)
MultiShove 2 months ago
1st why is this not in english ... or have english captions , and people m16 is used as a persision rifle the ak is used as a machine gun ... the fire selector switch is tells it all , ak is safe , fully auto , semi auto , m16 is safe , semi , 3shot burst , the ak is best at close range but the m16 is better at range ... they both are good for which ever job you need to do
vkigo3 2 months ago
Обе винтовки говно. Только м16 давно снята с вооружения а АК только снимается.
Для справки конструкция АК это усовершенствованная немецкая штурмовая винтовка времен 2ой мировой.
MaxZxCs 2 months ago
@MaxZxCs
Точность у калаша никакая во всех его модификациях колебания затвора обсирают все его достоинства.
Оружее должно быть больше точным чем надежным просто за ним нужно больше ухаживать.
MaxZxCs 2 months ago
@MaxZxCs Янки во Вьетнаме воевали АК а м-16 отстой! ак знаменита не меньше coca-cola
TheBezlikii 2 months ago
@TheBezlikii the m16 wipped ass and showed all its flaws then we changed it and made it beast .... ak is still that simple gun that fires thats all
vkigo3 2 months ago
@MaxZxCs какой винтовки- Stg 44? может лучше чем, что-либо говорить углубишься в детали и тогда поймешь, что общего у них лишь отдаленное сходство? Да и судя из коммента вы ни одного из автоматов в глаза не видели ни М16 ни АК.
yoshitoranaga1111 2 months ago
@yoshitoranaga1111 Stg44 was a sub machine gun it fired the 9mill but the ak fires a 7.62 cal , and they guns look exacly the same
vkigo3 2 months ago
@vkigo3 This is what I was trying to explain, they only similar not more
yoshitoranaga1111 2 months ago
@vkigo3 Stg44 fired a 7.92mm round which was a compromise between the long 8mm mauser and short 9mm pistol round (used in MP40). Sturmgewehr (STG) translated to English means Storm Rifle, and is not a submachine gun, Stg44 is recognised as the first ever assault rifle. The rifle is more accurate than Mp40, less accurate than the Mauser 98K but has the rapid fire capability of a submachine gun.
dean0101 2 months ago
.68?
elox02 2 months ago
74 wins on all aspects
Nikitos253 2 months ago 36
and what are those aspects
TheHappyjoy2011 1 month ago
@Nikitos253 accuracy, weight. battery of operation, balance, ergonomics, recoil managment, modularity, aftermarket options, caliber options...the list goes on. the AR15 is a supirior weapon in all of these aspects. that is FACT
HunterKiller308 1 month ago
@HunterKiller308 u forget the part of hard to clean and jams then dirty.
Nikitos253 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nikitos253 you have no experiance with the AR at all. you dont even have to keep it clean, just keep it lubed and replace parts as they go through their life cycle and the AR is an extremely reliable weapon with many major advantages over the AK. keep your ignorance to yourself.
HunterKiller308 1 month ago
whats with the porn music at the start?
michaelskeezz 2 months ago
whats with all the english comments when the videos in russian?
michaelskeezz 2 months ago
@michaelskeezz *Japanese
Reptile656 2 months ago
@michaelskeezz Video on Japanese xD
Araym51Mur 2 months ago
I'll take my sopmod SDM m4 with my .68 match grade
collguyjoe99 2 months ago
Вы все ГОВНО!!!
Flaw19 2 months ago
Lol yeah 5.56 tends to fragment at the cannelure here the jacket is thinnest over 2500fps depending on the gr. 5.45 has that air pocket under the jacket that deforms te bullet once it strikes something.
elox02 3 months ago
@NdzDJ
Um maybe if you describe it like a retard
5.45 tumbles more reliably, 5.56 has a tendency for the copper jacket to break apart leaving lead fragments floating through the soft tissue
the wound profile looks completely different
Redfingers 3 months ago
@NdzDJ
Ballistics is not the same, particularly terminal ballistics
Redfingers 3 months ago
Not to mention the barrel twist is 1:195mm just about 1:7 like the m4
elox02 3 months ago
5.45 bullet weight is about the same as 5.56 at 60gr and has roughly the same muzzle velocity as m855 at a little over 2900fps
elox02 3 months ago
Speed can negate that fact for some yardage before it effect it
elox02 3 months ago
@SSgt24thMEU true
Vamutus 3 months ago
It's like the dust test the military held,
Colt also states that ATEC's testers were unfamiliar with the M4s' 3-round burst configuration which, depending on the position of the cam, will sometimes fire 1 round or a 2-round burst before firing a 3-round burst. This unfamiliarity, said Colt, led to single rounds and 2-round bursts being counted as stoppages. With the exception of the M4s, all other weapons tested were fully automatic with no 3-round burst provision. Further, Colt points out that
elox02 3 months ago
So how was this test conducted? What was the fps of the round hitting the "gel" which will never act like flesh and bone.close, maybe if calibrated right but the human body/clothing are different from a brick of gel. What ammo? I have confidence the mk318 mod 0 or any other OTM bullet or bonded match bullet would expand or fragment at the cannelure at the right fps.
elox02 3 months ago
@SSgt24thMEU 5.56 will kill someone quicker and with more propability than 5.45, thats true. At 200 yards the difference in drop is barely 2 inches, at 500 its about 10. thats not very much. Both are great rifles, thats why they are so common.
Vamutus 3 months ago
@SSgt24thMEU 5.45x39 trajectory is pretty much on par with 5.56:s. Dont even start with the "stopping power" bullshit.
Vamutus 3 months ago
AK-47 the best
zaharix77 3 months ago
NO! not jap gun porn again!
CWHpr0ducti0ns 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NdzDJ
6.m16 has better ergonomics
I shot ak74 and m16 and i can say:
ak74 is more comfort to handle( weight equally distributed by hands, m16 most weight is on left hand
ak74 is easier to reload by position of shutter
Malloriak 3 months ago
If you study up you'll actually see that both are very good weapons. If I had to choose I would go with the M-16 or an M-4.
JoeRezac005 3 months ago
Honestly the first few times fired a 5.45x39 ak variant on semi auto it felt like a .22 lr. It has very little recoil. Never tried on full auto tho. I enjoy both my AR and my Ak variant. I couldn't bring myself to get one in 5.45x39 tho so my experience with that is with a friends. In smaller round ill take my AR for shtf I'll take what's closest but AR parts are plentiful here so I'd rather have that.
elox02 3 months ago
У M16 стволы перегреваются и их меняют ну не гавно?
DrScrappyDoo 3 months ago
АК-47, АК-74, это самые лучшие в мире автоматы, им весь мир пользуется, а м16 только для городских боёв где нет пыли, грязи и воды, а АК в любых условиях работает
serhsify 3 months ago
Ak74 doesn't come in 6.8
elox02 3 months ago
M193 and m855 don't expand they fragment at the cannalure between 2500-2700fps and up.
elox02 3 months ago
@NdzDJ
end of any discussion/argument. Thank you.
PetePhamous 3 months ago
АК силаааааааааа
MagomedDag05 3 months ago
AK is better :-)
bryndzik 3 months ago
range not same!!
worgate 4 months ago
ballistics are ALMOST the same, but the 5.45x39 tends to tumble and fragment more than the 5.56x45. With the AK-74...i mean i've fired those things one handed literally. The recoil is almost non-existant. If it came to a swat team, or some sort of police/urban situation where the weapons were stored in an armory till they were needed m16 is the right choice. But a true "battle rifle" is the AK platform, and there's no debating that. It's a foot soldier's weapon.
INKOFORANGE 4 months ago
@INKOFORANGE
no balistic are not the same at all.
the external ballist for the AK-74 are much better due to a longer and better balanced projectile.
this is even truer when compared to ahort barelled weapon like the M4 carabine
the internal balistic, at leat for the N6 and and N10 5.45 relies on tumbling quickly and they usually not expend/fragments. some form of expention migh occur for the N22 and N24 when the core rip the jacket
Expention is the main mean of wounding for the SS109/m855 is
willaumep 4 months ago
recoil fact is fail ak has not less recoil it has definely more recoil but its not bad a good guy can handle it like a n00b a m16
GeneralSchultz 4 months ago
@GeneralSchultz ak 47 does have a kick but but ak74 in comparison with it's older brother has a mere push
KGSultan 4 months ago
both suck i'd chose the aug reliable as the ak74 with a 6.8 chabering more powrful than an ak47 and more acurate ligher than both and shorter for no acuracy reduction
TheAlexagius 4 months ago
калаш самое лучшее оружие в мире,которому нет аналогов!!!!!
Azoom30 4 months ago 75
@Azoom30
калаш самое худшее оружие в мире, которому есть куча аналогов.
TVALATIN 4 months ago
@TVALATIN а может быть есть куча аналогов калашникова? ведь именно АК-47 стал первой в мире полноценной штурмовой винтовкой. Не считая STG-44 немецкого, но он выпускался малыми партиями. И только потом появилась эмка. в 60-х годах. И именно советского вторжения боялись соседи, что в один далеко не прекрасный миг полезут наши БМПшки и из них появятся солдаты с АК. мда... потом Вьетнам, Аыганистан, Чечня. И везде АК был гораздо эффективней американки.
MrGarman21 4 months ago
@TVALATIN ха ха ха, на говно аналогов бы не делали, копий калаша море, а вот м 16, сильно сомневаюсь...
mrCOMANCHEERO 4 months ago
@Azoom30 аналогов? ммм... каждая штурмовая винтовка является аналогом друг-друга
Kostja08a 4 months ago
@Azoom30 :-))) Наивный...
xxxPahanxxx 2 months ago
@Azoom30 Да ну? АК уже давно устарел и лучших аналогов предостаточно.
raskukan 2 months ago
@raskukan Долбоеб,он самый надежный и простой,и это главное,ты на "лучшие"аналоги хоть что навешай,пусть суперточность будет и скорострельность,но попробуй кинь в грязь ,утопи в песке, выстрели подряд 3 обоймы в режимеРЕАЛЬНОГО боя ,а не не на показушных видеосьемках где рекламируют эти "лучшие",и поймешь-почему весь мир использует АК.Он тебя не подведет ни на крайнем севере ни в жаркой пустыне,ни в джунглях,ни в городских условиях,где он бетонные стены прошивает влегкую.спи бля,короче
romrus100 2 months ago 55
@romrus100 Вот мне все нравится, просто все время хочется добавить слово "был".
я просто рекомендую обратить внимание на современные аналоги, а не устраивать спор по поводу стариков. у кого когда-то что то было лучше. АК очень хорош в определенных моментах как и М16. А Ваши заявления уважаемый говорят только о том что Вы не очень в теме, или просто не имеете возможности знакомиться с новыми видами.
Cre8tt 1 month ago
@romrus100 Чувак,ты прав! Дело говоришь!
sNow9788 1 month ago
Comment removed
Winghelm 1 month ago
Comment removed
Winghelm 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@romrus100 Весь мир? АК используют нищие африканские и южноамериканские нигры и ближневосточные бомжи-ахметы, у кототорых денег нет на что-либо получше. Весь мир использует FN FAL и HK G3, блять, во-первых. Во-вторых, M16A3 с RIS на манер M16A4 уделает по всем параметрам боевых характеристик АК-74М, кроме надёжности, особенно если к ней прицепить боевую оптику вроде ACOG и зарядить 5.56×45mm M855A1. Она покажет КАЛашу лучшую кучность при больших скорострельности, бронебойности и раневом канале
Winghelm 1 month ago
@romrus100 english motherfucker, can you speak it?
HunterKiller308 1 month ago
@romrus100 полностью согласен !!!!
MrAipot 1 week ago
@Azoom30 Хуле, ядерная бомба получше будет! А вообще ас "Вал" из автоматов всех тащит
netpsychosis 2 months ago
@Azoom30 полностью с тобой согласен
RuBIK0911 1 month ago
@NdzDJ Alright for one, I dont have an xbox or a ps3 to play cod on so thats that, but your arguments dont have any substance! Range is not the same, just becuase it uses a similiar round does not mean that it has the same range. The M-16 is a rifle, while the Ak-74 is a carbine. And i said the reliablity of the AK-74 is better than the 16, so listen next time.
shotguntothefaceouch 4 months ago
@NdzDJ I still think you're just playing with words, but it's a bullpup design. The weight is always going to be in the back. Bullpups have more advantages than negatives though, so I have no problem with it.
EnigmaHood 4 months ago
@NdzDJ Lol you're just playing with words man. Saying it's not light at all, means you think it's heavy lol.
EnigmaHood 4 months ago
@NdzDJ Didn't we already go through this? I proved the SA80 is lighter than the M16. But yes, it is a bit too heavy for a bullpup, but the FN F2000 is lighter, and that was the issue at hand.
EnigmaHood 4 months ago
@NdzDJ I dono, I read some reviews and all of them were extremely positive. It's not that heavy, the SA80 weighs more. It's heavier than the Tavor though.
EnigmaHood 4 months ago
m16 is the best
samedzade1 4 months ago
@NdzDJ wrong, the ak74 has almost as much rcoil as an ak-47, partly becuase it is of the same design, the M-16 has much less recoil, ak-74 is more reliable than the m-16, but the m-16 is a very reliable weapon, save the a1 version, which was a peice of shit. m-16 is a much more accurate weapon that the ak-74, and with a few modifications, the m-16 can function as a sniper rifle. M-16 has better range as well, than the ak-74 which is considered a carbine.
shotguntothefaceouch 4 months ago
@NdzDJ Plastic gets an unfair rap because most people associate it with cheap products. There are many different kinds of plastics that are high quality and extremely durable. I see nothing wrong with a gun that has all non-essential parts made out of plastic. Really, metal just weighs the thing down, and can even have rust issues which plastics do not suffer from. If you can replace as many parts with lighter plastic parts, I see no reason not to.
EnigmaHood 4 months ago
@NdzDJ SA80 and its variants:
3.82 kg (8.4 lb) (L85A1 empty)
4.98 kg (11.0 lb) (L85A1 with SUSAT sight and loaded 30 round magazine)
6.58 kg (14.5 lb) (L86A1 LSW)
4.42 kg (9.7 lb) (L22A1)
M16 weight
7.18 lbs (3.26 kg) (unloaded)
8.79 lb (4.0 kg) (loaded)
What magazine said that?
EnigmaHood 4 months ago
@NdzDJ Uhh the L85A2 weighs as less than the M16. I never heard of any major jamming problems from the FN F2000. All reports I've read have said that it's very reliable.
EnigmaHood 4 months ago
@NdzDJ The M16 is also 50 years old. Even the AK74 is going to be replaced by the AK-200. But honestly there are better rifles out there right now. The Tavor, the FAMAS, the FN F2000, the L85A2, all of these rifles are better than either the M16 or the AK74, America is just holding on to the M-16/M4 because the guys who are in charge of weapon procurement have lucrative deals with Colt. The LSAT program is the only glimmer of hope of finally replacing the M16.
EnigmaHood 4 months ago
Why do they always have hicks firing these guns? Even on Japanese programming... ><
EnigmaHood 4 months ago
@NdzDJ I dont need to check some idiots videos on Youtube, especially cokemans dumb ass, I OWN them both. I shoot them allot, the AR has less recoil because of the way the buffer tube is designed and how the stock doesn't hinge from the recoil. Its easier to keep on target and allow for faster follow up shots. The 74 is a nice gun, its has almost no recoil compared to the 47, but its not as easy on the shoulder and an AR. That's a fact.
pac6010 4 months ago
@NdzDJ That's wrong actually the Ak-74 has more recoil than the m16, thats because of the way the bolt is not center of gravity back to the butt stock. Where as the m16 is a straight shot all the way back.
pac6010 4 months ago
AK-47 Forever
krreyzi 4 months ago
Russian Quality!!!
DeeLil911 4 months ago
Unfortinatly I have personal experience with M16.It sucks.
Cheburashka207 4 months ago
AK47.It doesn't jam.It can fire under water,in the sand,everywhere.
Cheburashka207 4 months ago
AK rocks !
quattrionidis 4 months ago
erotic gun video!!
mexiluvsw 4 months ago
The M16/M4 are so versatile that it is better than all ak platforms :)
techdeckdude4 5 months ago
gay
Abdikarimelmi 6 months ago
m16 is great accuracy and power is good but in terms of reliability it is downfall u need to keep a good maintenance in this gun so it wont get jammed, ak-47 on the other hand is so-so in accuracy but in fire power it is great and reliability is pretty good, it will still fire even if run by Humvee, soak in water, and buried in sand it still works.
Lavurne 6 months ago
@Lavurne when it comes to accuracy. If i aim at your heart and hit you two inches to the left, you will still die:)
mothertruckah 6 months ago
this is like comparring a barret with a pistol i know that the 74 has almost the same cartridge but it's a monster
herseyvatanicin31 7 months ago
AK47 is a SOVIET UNION GUN and it is a 7.62 times 39mm round .. and that's strong as a sniper rifle but it is full auto and sem-auto..
Dylan10188 7 months ago
@Dylan10188 its not as strong as a sniper rifle. 7.62 is a caliber not a sniper round.... a ak is only good out to around 300 yards not any were near as far as a snipers round shoud go. the 39 in 7.62x39 means the caseing of the round is 39mm long not times... a m16s 5.56 is good out to 1000 yards. aks are not an accurate gun its a fire in that general direction gun. a m16 is a rifle that is very accurate. aks are very reliable not a snipers weapon.
hunteraja 7 months ago
@Dylan10188 Yeah try again kid, 7.62x39 is no wear near as powerful as a sniper round. The US military uses the 7.62x51 and the former Soviet republics use 7.62x54r as their "sniper rounds". The 7.62x39 is an intermediate round, in the same class as the 5.56 or 5.45.
fn1046 7 months ago
@fn1046 okay i was wrong what i met to say was almost strong as a sniper... but can you not call me a kid ass hole i bet you have no life and still live with your mom and dad so.... o ya and if you are in the "MILITARY" lol i bet you got shot by a kalashnikov.. o wait you would be dead hahahahahhaha
Dylan10188 7 months ago
@Dylan10188 Look dude I wasn't trying to insult you, by calling you "kid", i call everyone kid I ment no disrespect. But you're still wrong a 7.62x51 the round used in the M40 and M24 sniper rifles, is more power than the 7.62 soviet by ft lb in almost every grain. I love the 7.62 soviet and my ak is probably the rifle i shot the most, but love it for what it is an intermediate rifle round.
fn1046 7 months ago
@fn1046 ***1000 ftlb
fn1046 7 months ago
@fn1046 okay sorry... but when people call me kid i get mad
Dylan10188 7 months ago
@Dylan10188
It´s not really strong as a sniper rifle. But the 7.62*39 is better than 5.56*45, or 5.45*39.
Melder92 6 months ago
@Melder92 i know that stop telling me that god some other guy said the same thing
Dylan10188 6 months ago
@Dylan10188
sorry i haven´t seen this ._.
Melder92 6 months ago
@Melder92 depends on the type of firearm. Dedicated machineguns and anti-personell snipers should use the 7.62. but assault rifles the 5.56 is the best choice, because altough it doesnt have as much range or stopping power then the 7.62, it has greater killing power(different from stopping power) and more accuracy due to the kick. and with snipers now adays are slowly replacing the 7.62 in favor of 50. BMG anti-material rifles, even some using 20mm! in short, urban combat, youll want the 5.56
AhhizGodzilla 5 months ago
@AhhizGodzilla
IMO the 5.56 is a piece of shit. I would use 7.62*39, 6.5 Grendel, or 6.8 Remington SPC instead. The 5.56 bullet is too light and can break easily when it hits something in range up to 100-150meters. Thats a huge loss of energy and damage. 6.5 and 6.8 are favourited by me.
Melder92 5 months ago
@Melder92 thats the point, the 5.56 yaws and fragments in tissue, causing much more trauma then a 7.62 round
AhhizGodzilla 5 months ago
@AhhizGodzilla
No it´s still a piece of shit. Winds will blow the bullet away, and it loses speed in the air very fast, you doesn´t need much armor, etc. And bullet breaks BEFORE wounding the target, it will break on impact. Assaultrifles should be usefull under bad weather conditions like strong wind. 6.5 Grendel, 6.8 Rem SPC, 7.62*39 and 7.62*51 NATO can spin in a target too, leaving a peranent wound channel up to 20mm. Ask the troops in afghanistan, most are using the 7.62 instead 5.56
Melder92 5 months ago
@Melder92 hell a 50.cal will blow with wind. and its not a sniper, it doesnt need to maintain speed for an extended period. and it usually doesnt break on impact. llike i would take an M16 over an AKM anyday. even the soviets are using a round smaller then the 5.56 round. my point. 7.62 isnt a good assault rifle round, but its amazing in MGs. Snipers, youll want the 50.BMG(if anti-material). the smaller the gun, the smaller the round should be
AhhizGodzilla 5 months ago
@AhhizGodzilla He's saying the projectile because it's so light is more easily influenced by the wind. A heavier projectile won't be as influenced by the wind. The Soviets replaced the 7.62x39 true, but Spetsnaz units still use the 7.62x39 because it's better against barriers, and for more lethality perhaps. I think the 7.62 is great for assault rifles. A lot of reports suggest the 5.56x45 has questionable lethality.
esh325 5 months ago
@esh325 Really? ive read alot that says that while the 7.62 has more stopping power, the 5.56 is more lethal. plus u dont really have the issue of alot of recoil, so u can put more rounds on target, and if u hit a vital area, u dont really need a larger projectile.
AhhizGodzilla 5 months ago