Obesity has been more precisely defined by the National Institutes of Health (the NIH) as a BMI of 30 and above. (A BMI of 30 is about 30 pounds overweight.)
So I guess "scientists" can't stop scaremongering overweight and obese people.. now they turn to the actual healthy ones.. and trying their luck on them.
Maybe we should be more concerned about the fact that we could be frying in North Korean radiation rather than developing diabetes or heart disease eh?
Might seem a stupid question but is it possible to be harboring internal fat under a ripped six pack?
TimpBizkit 1 month ago
That woman did look a bit saggy but I'd never guess 38% fat
TimpBizkit 8 months ago
so if im maybe a normal weight of 101pounds at 14 so im obese now??
sazz102 8 months ago
great 165lbs. i am a TANK. OR I COULD B A LINEBACKER. BOY I AM OBESE.
chadberry75 11 months ago
Terminology is incorrect.
Obesity has been more precisely defined by the National Institutes of Health (the NIH) as a BMI of 30 and above. (A BMI of 30 is about 30 pounds overweight.)
4154wife 2 years ago
@4154wife surely body fat % is more accurate or multiplying body fat % by BMI
TimpBizkit 8 months ago
This is common sense.
BMI just measures weight to height.
There are bodybuilders who are healthy at 190 lb and are 5'8" with low body fat; A BMI calculator would say they are obese, but it would be wrong.
Gr3mpy123 2 years ago
So I guess "scientists" can't stop scaremongering overweight and obese people.. now they turn to the actual healthy ones.. and trying their luck on them.
Maybe we should be more concerned about the fact that we could be frying in North Korean radiation rather than developing diabetes or heart disease eh?
WolfyWardark 2 years ago 3
Your name is mayoclinic and you're calling everyone fat eh?
ForceUser 2 years ago
GREAT. Now I'm ugly AND fat.
Digeridude 2 years ago 8