9/11 New FLIR Footage of Twin Towers Burning

[M1jN]

I've used FLIR cameras, and they pick up surface radiation (infrared wavelengths). Yes, surface radiation, which includes all radiation reflecting and transmitting from a surface. They cannot see through walls, only the heat signature of the wall's surface. FLIR cameras cannot even see through windows. From this angle, it's clear this is a surface reflection of the other tower. Even the walls of the towers surrounding each fire don't have such a heat signature as high as what you're looking at.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@M1jN I use them at work. It picks up light, which is a form of radiant energy, so is heat. The source is releasing heat and light proportionally. The greater the heat released, higher spectrum. Its a camera. The spot on the North Tower could be a reflection, except it acts on its own independently, not copying the signature on the other face. Not to say yours is not a solid and very good bservation. The 59 degree walls could not be much cooler in summer, the ambient lows are higher than that

[IranContraScumDid911]

@M1jN I am a PE. I have used these for years in preventive maintenance of electrical and mechanical equipment. I am now the COO of a engineering firm. We currently have both Exetech and FLIR cameras. The models are single handed. We now use them primarily for detecting heat leakage from building envelopes and for ductwork. I look into walls and find missing insulation, INTO the wall. They are very useful in detecting wear, loose connections, or inefficiency in electric motors and pumps as well

[IranContraScumDid911]

@M1jN I know that idiot, I am looking at the heat signature or lack of one in the mass of the wall. You can tell what is inside the wall, where the structural; members are, where it is insulated, even how insulated it is. I detect duct and envelope leakage, cool or warm air. I can tell if it is hot INSIDE an electric pump or motor by the surface temp. We can tell how hot the buiulding is being heated, by its surface temp. Two of our cameras go from 2 feet to miles in their reading distrance.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@M1jN I am a mechanical engineer, I am also a mechanical contractor, I spoecialize in hydronic heating. Boilers, pumps, furnaces, and water ..... AND building heating loads. I do it every day. I think you are real stupid, honestly. How are you going to check all the insulation and wall temps in a large commercial building without a FLIR camera? Feel it with your hands for a few days, maybe get a lift to feel the ceilings? YOUR an idiot!!! You use a FLIR Camera to see the envelope performence

[IranContraScumDid911]

@M1jN I am applying the fire tetrahedron to a fire .... you have a better benchmark?

[IranContraScumDid911]

@M1jN If the fires are 1500-2000 degrees plus inside the building would the exterior surface heat up to more than 59 degrees (ambient)? Forget the FLIR, lets test it with the visible spectrum. The fires are dull orange which tells us they are at the low end of the heat spectrum. The fires are poorly combusted. An inefficient combustion fails to convert the CO-CO2 gasses and does not burn all the fuel, cannot exceed 30% potential heat. This is confirmed in the very high smoke to small flame ratio

[IranContraScumDid911]

@M1jN You are a combustion engineer? You should understand stoiciometric efficiency and the fire tetrahedron. The heat cannot be high because there is not enough oxygen in that smoke filled enclosed space. You would know candles burn far more efficiently than these fires. The light spectrum of the diffuse flame (color) and the smoke to flame ratio .... engineer. Your a fraud, or a bad combustion engineer. A candle is hotter than the fires in the WTC, thats how. These fires are 200C+

[IranContraScumDid911]

@M1jN What is the visible spectrum of a candle vs. the visible spectrum of these fires? Which is brighter? Which has more smoke? Which is far more efficient in combustion? Which is releasing the potential energy in the fuel more efficiently? If they are both carbon based fires what are we seeing in comparison to the other? Which would be hotter? Prove to me you are an engineer ..... in your own words. I bet a million bucks your a rookie, that is just learning all this. Real world is not school.

[M1jN]

@IranContraScumDid911 Candles burn with a full visible spectrum, most wavelengths around 570 nm. The WTC fire on the exterior of the building burns with redder wavelengths in the visible spectrum (around 590 nm). The WTC fire on the exterior of the building has more smoke, so candles would appear more efficient. However, you cannot see the full WTC fire whatsoever. It is internally-housed and IT'S AN ACRE IN DIAMETER. Are you an engineer judging a fire by its edges? Every flame has red edges.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@M1jN What does science say about a class A/B fire with a dull red-orange diffuse flame? Can you tell the temp of a carbon based fire by the flame color? You can. What does all that smoke tell you, engineer? Scientific observation is something they dont teach anymore?

[FLICKtheUSA]

@IranContraScumDid911

No, they don't teach anything related to science and math in the US anymore. Hence the country has fallen behind.

They concentrate on more important things, like football. LOL that's why I hate this fucking place. The country deserves another 9/11.

[bambam9969]

To bad that thing wasn't running when the towers came down

[IranContraScumDid911]

@bambam9969 It probably was, but we do not get to see that footage.

[MrGAB4444]

I would like to see this technique and other thermal viewing technologies applied seconds before and during the collapse of the towers and building 7 as applied here and to possibly enhance proof of thermite and/or detonation evidence

[oceanrefusesnoriver]

where is the next hour of this tape?

[bigc028282]

Interesting lower heat significant in the one. I am assuming it may be fuel related, but I didn't see the same type of event in the other building.

This is new and improved PentaCON/TardBI released imagery??

[IranContraScumDid911]

@bigc028282 If 9/11 was real they would have released the whole video of this and all the other evidence to the people on 9/12/2001 to the public.

[bigc028282]

@IranContraScumDid911 The most simplistic answer to "inside job" I have heard. PERFECT!!

[bluewilliam]

@bigc028282 I am inclined to suspect it's some kind of reflection. Notice how it's at the same height as the impact site in the left building.

[dnnylee]

Thank you for posting this video

[MsMilkytheclown]

gotcha. Ugh. Why is all this lying going on! I'm really mad about this stuff! (not just 9-11) but trying to "cover" (bad choice of words) the stupid (other words also) BP BS now... Etc... Ugh ugh ugh....

[IranContraScumDid911]

@MsMilkytheclown Do not be too discouraged, there are many things about 9/11 that could not be hidden. It is all being revealed. If this actually FLIR footage of the towers it is good stuff either way :)

[MsMilkytheclown]

@IranContraScumDid911 thanks for the post... Looking forward to part 2 or... etc...

take care :)

[TheFlex21]

ex US marine Ken O'keefe: Israeli Mossad on 9/11

watch?v=BcVTI09T5D4

[MsMilkytheclown]

That's intense. Do you have the rest of it with floors exploding, ya know, the previously placed "devices" ? Zoinks. that's good footage!

[IranContraScumDid911]

@MsMilkytheclown That is all for now, but we know there is more, this is a few seconds of an hour plus fire. Gonna review it closer, might be altered, since the FBI just released it recently. Most FOIA released stuff is reviewed and edited by Pentbom

[OzzyPatriot]

@IranContraScumDid911 Yeah. That's the rub. It's like the mafia being asked to hand over video of its own crimes.