I think this music sheet must be very difficult to read. It may be easy for some people to play a piece like this without having to look at music sheet, but it's definitely hard to play it exactly the same the second time. And not to mention to write it down. Yes. This young lady is quite incredible to be able to recite and play a piece like this.
Regarding atonal VS tonal music - rock 'n roll appalled people back in the day, too, and so did Mozart and Stravinsky. If composers never dared to push the boundaries, we wouldn't have all the music that's available to us today.
That aside, I think this young lady is incredible. She took a piece like this and performed it beautifully, with a lot of passion and emotion.
I personally LOVE atonality, but some in the audience might be like "wtf, she is just playing random notes!" There is actually a lot of thinking and emotion behind the dissonance in atonality, it actually takes thinking it order to try your best to NOT play anything tonal. Playing random notes might accidentally fall in tonality.
@OceanderTethyseus do me a favour, please, and listen to Bach's "Große Fuge" (in english it might me sth like "great fugue" ) and then say that again. seriously. without being stubborn.
Schoenberg wrote really beautiful tonal music, and even his tonal music he managed to stretch the boundaries, like his Transfigured Night. But listen to Webern when you have finished with Schoenberg especially his cantata.
if disonance were taken as consonance it would be the same chaos on comments lol.
its a matter of humanity traditions, our concept of consonant is so made up, made up by men, getting out of traditions is not better or worst, like some dull ppl here says, it's just that maybe your disonances are consonances to other, and viceversa. every human is a lab himself.
The people of his time were radicals..They disobeyed the culture and stereotypes...They watched the world burn and no one would dare to scream the pain the world was in...(I Am talking about WWI and WWII). They were forbidden in most of the art galleries and theatre houses...But still they made the world hear them... These compositions sound dull and a waste of time to most...But if you know what is to feel suffering, torment, agony, sadness and loneliness...You know what youre listening...
@GREGOHARD classical music literally forced this music onto audiences and music students for half of the 20th century. These composers were anything but shunned by the academic institution of music.
I think you're romanticizing the notion of portraying pain and suffering a bit. These composers desperately wanted to be the next of the "great masters," and were more concerned with "furthering music" than anything else. The fact that their music did not resonate with the public is not irrelevant.
Are we sure this is atonal music? Listening it very carefully we can "discover" in this pieces a tonal "scheme" and "mentality". There is not a official "tonality" in the classic sense, but we can join some harmonic passages with other tonal harmonic scheme...
Are we sure this is atonal music? Listening it very carefully we can "discover" in this pieces a tonal "scheme" and "mentality". There is a official "tonality" in the classic sense, but we can join some harmonic passages with other tonal harmonic scheme...
EVERYONE JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, THIS MUSIC WAS MEANT TO SOUND THIS WAY. ITS CALLED SERIAL MUSIC. THIS WAS A PERIOD WHEN THEY THOUGHT JUST RANDOM NOTES WOULD EQUAL MUSIC.
The 20th century was a time of war, chaos, and increased industrialization. It seems appropriate to me that dark, dissonant music would be created during such uncertain times. It doesn't invalidate earlier music or the music of other cultures, but I do hear it as a viable alternative.
close your eyes and imagine a guy stuck in a mansion, thinking someone is gonna kill him anytime... this piece of art is perfect in describing emotion
What most of you undeveloped people don't realize is that music is almost like that of a skill. it has to be trained and developed. this song is very spiritually, musically, and technically advanced. you don't like it because your still stuck on baby stuff and will only listen to what is pleasing to the ear. it must be hard to express yourself through music with such limitations. if your stuck in pure tonality, you are only hearing about 1% of what music is really out there. no exaggeration.
its not any better or worse... atonal is simply a reaction to tonal music... like the anti-art after ww1... its interpreted differently and judged differently...
@louis621 it is not really interpreted differently... Schoenberg himself used to say that his music is romantic, so it must be played like that. it's a kind of late Brahms, or even Chopin.
@mizutofu: Atonal isn't better, it's worse. There's a reason why the music of cultures all over the world, and for centuries, is tonal. Because certain frequencies have ratios to others that blend nicely and are pleasant to listen to. Atonal is dissonant and unpleasant to listen to. And while that last characteristic may be used to good effect for short periods of time in certain pieces of music to invoke some kind of disagreeable mood, it's just plain ugly for entire pieces of music.
Atonal music it's not made to "pleasant". It's an artistic and revolutionary movement in music and if you see the time that serialism born, it match to many artistic movements with the same "intention". Dont listen to this, trying to hear a beatiful music to your ears... Its beatiful in a way of thinking, not acusticaly. By the way, tonal music is not natural ok? tempered tuning it's very distant from "acustic" perfection...
This is obviously abrasive and ugly music. But that in no way what so ever means that it isn't amazing.
If you've ever enjoyed a movie like 'Silence of the Lambs", or 'Fargo' then you understand my meaning.
With music some people can only see the musicality in Disney cartoons (there equivalent). Others such as myself and many of the other people posting here understand that just because something is ugly, does not mean it is not beautiful.
Can you describe what you get out of listening to this sort of thing? I've been a musician most of my life, but I enjoy beautiful melodies, lyrics and so on. I am prepared to admit that I don't have the musical intellect to appreciate eg Coltrane, Zappa and others, but I would be interested to know why those that do enjoy it. I can enjoy tension in music, but only with resolution. Can you enlighten me?
Firstly, I do not find this music particularly tense, at least not compared to the convulse tonal music that preceded it. Listen to Schoenberg's first (wholly tonal) String Quartet if you want to hear something truly unintelligible and tense. Secondly, I enjoy it for the same reason why I enjoy all other music, I recognize the human intelligence behind it, I find such challenging music far more beautiful than the vacuous garbage that is minimalism, for example.
@yaisum the same artistic flavour can be taken out of this sort of music, as can from extreme metal, and distortion etc. brain craves new sound, something different, something new and exciting and something raw. this music fits those categories well
no es serialismo. es atonalismo libre. es la etapa anterior al dodecafonismo. en éstas piezas schoenberg trabaja con "sets de sonidos" que guardan entre sí una relación interválica.
... interesante, la verdad no escucho relacion alguna, supongo que habria que tener la partitura para hacer el analisís y alguien como usted me explique cual es la relación, sea como sea, tiene un aire muy diferente este tipo de musica, para mi es como si tensionara los sonidos y luego los "aliviara" osea causara un efecto agradable para volverlo a tensionar y asi va, asi lo describiria yo
la verdad, no es fácil escuchar a primera audicion dichas relaciones interválicas. sobre todo cuando los "sets de alturas" estan tocados en distintos registros. por ej: si un set tiene 3 notas(por ej do reb mi) y suena el Mi en el registro grave,el Reb en el registro medio,y el Do en el agudo, ahi se hace muy difícil de escuchar. pero cuando dicho set aparece en un mismo registro, es más facil de escuchar. de todas formas hace falta "acostumbrar el oído" a ésta música.que es bellìsima!
Arnold Schoenberg is absolutely incredible, his music really is an insight into the madness of his own mind hahaha, sometimes I wish a few more people could feel the 'madness' though...
it's a bit lonely being the only teenager who likes him XD
i understand how it works you know, like only 12 notes throughout the whole piece. but to me music needs a key... atonal sounds bad to listen to, that's why key signatures were actually found. well i'm not going to say anything else on it, everyone has their own opinion.
i find the pianists who perform serialism much more interesting than the music. they make it interesting to watch.
but i think if u are open for it and get used to this kind of music it will sound better and better to your ears... a few years ago i found this kind of music simply horrible... although i must admit that i miss some rythm in this... so maybe future composer can make further work on this
yourforte..."serious videos" sometimes produce a good laugh, the other day some nut translated "..con un detto sol tu puoi, le mie pene consolar" as, "...with just a word you can console my penis" our Italian friends probably got a good laugh from that!!
yourforte, I'd as soon listen to fingernails being dragged across a chalkboard as listen to Schoenberg; as for G. Clooney, naked or otherwise, thanks but no thanks...he was a good comic in the old Emergency Room series, but hasn't done well since.
Me too. I don't want to look at George Clooney naked - or any other man for that matter. I wasn't clear what a naked George Clooney had to do with Schoenberg anyway. Something about my apparently being a 'convent girl'. I always find it laughable when people resort to infantilia just because you don't like what they profess to like. I didn't expect it on 'serious' videos though.
awixa2, thank you for forgiving me. My remarks were directed at ad80ad because he thought listening to Schoenberg ought to be as pleasurable as looking at George Clooney naked. I don't like Schoenberg and I have no desire to look at George Clooney naked. Apparently this makes me a 'convent girl' with no heart...
Schoenbergs piano music sounds like a cat (or dog) ambling up and down the keyboard...may sound good to the cat, but sounds like s..t to me, but I'm pretty unsophisticated!
awixa2 - I suspect you aren't at all unsophisticated. There was more gift in one of Bach's Little Preludes than there was in the whole of Schoenberg's oeuvre. And if you want to hear some chromatic notes that work, listen to Webern's orchestration of Bach's Ricercare. Btw, I've just pilched Ruhe Sanft from Bach's St Matt Passion from your favourites.
furtivotrix, I said music isn't JUST for the mind - not that it's not for the mind at all. Atonal music would never have won over tonal music; it sounds horrible, that's why. Serialism, for example, was developed as a way to organise music. And it succeeds at that. Most serialist music sounds horrible, however. Music is answerable to the ear. Composers, fortunately, are now coming to terms with that. This work is no longer contemporary: it's nearly 100 yrs old. The Emperor's New Clothes...
AHHHHHHHAHAHAH...it sounds horrible to the ears...ahahahah...it is like to say that to see Jessica Alba naked looks horrible to the eyes (in your case...George Clooney?)...this bullshit about "to sonund horrible" is only an academic moralistic matter between convent girls, fortunately intelligent people doesn't wast their time thinking about what is licit and not licit in music. If i see a woman naked leg at the cinema and I'm a moralist I don't say:"It is horrible" buahuahuaha
"It sounds horrible to the ears" is logical nonsense and I would never have written it. I don't like looking at Jessica Alba or George Clooney naked - mind your own business about that. I played these pieces for my Grade 8 many years ago. Fortunately I no longer have to pretend to like them. 'Licit' and 'illicit' are not terms that make sense in regard to music. So please don't put illogical sentences into my mouth
"It sounds horrible", sorry fot the logical nonsense...probably logic is your first quality, before having a heart.Don't you like looking at George Clooney? You confirm what I said: you are a convent girl. Good for you...fortunately the world today is going another way. We are in 2008, and your moralism sounds a bit outadet.But you know...while you pasturing in your academism, someone other outside your little world enjoys himself and attempts to realize his dreams.WAKE UP!
I'm not a convent girl.Mind your own business.Whether or not I like looking at George Clooney naked is none of your business.Whether or not I have a heart is none of your business.However, I wouldn't be a musician if I didn't have a heart.I AM logical,however,so don't put illogical words into my mouth.And, let's face it, not many people like this music.And it's about 100 years old-so you needn't talk about MY views being outdated.Music has emerged from the bleakness of the early 20th century
I know, let's all start a shitstorm for the people who like atonal music! I personally think atonal music is more of a musical experiment and you have to look at it from the perspective that it's intention is not the same as most tonal music. You can't compare schoenberg to bach, although i do agree i wouldn't put on serialism to relax.
i honestly do.. just think about that last statement you made, that music isn't for the mind. Really.. come on now. this kind of stuff makes me wonder what mainstream music would sound like if atonal had won over tonal music. your opinion would be quite different, as would all opinions. but that is exactly the point. everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Impressive playing, but who in all honesty likes this 'music'? The time has come to admit that the foregoing of tonality had a disastrous effect on 20th century music. Thank goodness composers are starting to come to their senses. Music is for the ear, not just for the mind.
no offense but thats 1) factually false and 2) a totally subjective opinion of yours based on absolutely nothing except your own closed mindedness and prudishness. the end.
a good performance of "bad" music doesn't make the music better...it just makes the performance good.
There are technical aspects of both performing and music that make them something "good".
This is both a good performance and good music because the performer is trained in what she's doing and doing it well and the music isn't just noise. Shoenberg wrote music based on a system...he didn't just hit keys and call it music...which is still an acceptable form of the art.
I thought you did a pretty good job. The music is so precise, it must be hard to get every tempo change and every dynamic. Well done. I did think that many of the tempi were a little too slow. When it's that slow, it's hard to hear the phrases and the development of the themes. Also, I think the rests are pretty important formally, so it might be helpful to place them a little bit more precisely.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i just like to enjoy listening to music. i dont enjoy this. OK she did show some skill but if she made a mistake or was just making it up, nobody would no because it is not distinctive or tonal or annything that music should be.
i suppose that's somewhat true...the bit about not being able to tell if she made a mistake or made it up. But, although I personally don't like this type of music, she did a lovely job playing it.
This is not rubbish. This is called paying attention to detail and precision. It sounds easy, but it's hard to master.
gguo96 2 months ago
I think this music sheet must be very difficult to read. It may be easy for some people to play a piece like this without having to look at music sheet, but it's definitely hard to play it exactly the same the second time. And not to mention to write it down. Yes. This young lady is quite incredible to be able to recite and play a piece like this.
toAbigail 4 months ago
Comment removed
toAbigail 4 months ago
Well thats a thrilling music!
Its awesome!!
diesechspfade 4 months ago
LOL!!! I could play this without even looking at the sheet music!! LMAO!!!
BK3007 4 months ago
Regarding atonal VS tonal music - rock 'n roll appalled people back in the day, too, and so did Mozart and Stravinsky. If composers never dared to push the boundaries, we wouldn't have all the music that's available to us today.
That aside, I think this young lady is incredible. She took a piece like this and performed it beautifully, with a lot of passion and emotion.
waltzforluma 4 months ago
Could someone please explain where the musical value is in this??!!
ecobenoman 5 months ago
I personally LOVE atonality, but some in the audience might be like "wtf, she is just playing random notes!" There is actually a lot of thinking and emotion behind the dissonance in atonality, it actually takes thinking it order to try your best to NOT play anything tonal. Playing random notes might accidentally fall in tonality.
mechwarreir2 6 months ago
WTF? It's too bad!!!!!
micaciche 7 months ago
it irks me to no end that Schoenberg is held up as a great music theorist. he is a joker and a fraud and a purveyor of poop.
OceanderTethyseus 8 months ago
When my cat fall on to my piano! Shitty sheet
GlimpseInTheLife 8 months ago
utter rubbish
bach would spit in his face
OceanderTethyseus 10 months ago
@OceanderTethyseus do me a favour, please, and listen to Bach's "Große Fuge" (in english it might me sth like "great fugue" ) and then say that again. seriously. without being stubborn.
Fagottissima 8 months ago
Comment removed
OceanderTethyseus 8 months ago
Comment removed
AquariaSpirit 6 months ago
@OceanderTethyseus
Retard
gubbbies 5 months ago
@gubbbies
this song should have been titled, "six little pieces of shit".
OceanderTethyseus 5 months ago
@OceanderTethyseus It's more of a concept than anything..
contrapuntalslunk 5 months ago
Schoenberg wrote really beautiful tonal music, and even his tonal music he managed to stretch the boundaries, like his Transfigured Night. But listen to Webern when you have finished with Schoenberg especially his cantata.
ottodachat 10 months ago
the video makes no really sence... she is not playing the same, like you can hear...
06SeAnFe09 10 months ago
shitttyt
pasna45 1 year ago
I especially like the last one at 5:07
lovingboarding 1 year ago
if disonance were taken as consonance it would be the same chaos on comments lol.
its a matter of humanity traditions, our concept of consonant is so made up, made up by men, getting out of traditions is not better or worst, like some dull ppl here says, it's just that maybe your disonances are consonances to other, and viceversa. every human is a lab himself.
MAYLO777 1 year ago 2
The people of his time were radicals..They disobeyed the culture and stereotypes...They watched the world burn and no one would dare to scream the pain the world was in...(I Am talking about WWI and WWII). They were forbidden in most of the art galleries and theatre houses...But still they made the world hear them... These compositions sound dull and a waste of time to most...But if you know what is to feel suffering, torment, agony, sadness and loneliness...You know what youre listening...
GREGOHARD 1 year ago
@GREGOHARD classical music literally forced this music onto audiences and music students for half of the 20th century. These composers were anything but shunned by the academic institution of music.
I think you're romanticizing the notion of portraying pain and suffering a bit. These composers desperately wanted to be the next of the "great masters," and were more concerned with "furthering music" than anything else. The fact that their music did not resonate with the public is not irrelevant.
Azshmo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are we sure this is atonal music? Listening it very carefully we can "discover" in this pieces a tonal "scheme" and "mentality". There is not a official "tonality" in the classic sense, but we can join some harmonic passages with other tonal harmonic scheme...
Mozart1800 1 year ago
Are we sure this is atonal music? Listening it very carefully we can "discover" in this pieces a tonal "scheme" and "mentality". There is a official "tonality" in the classic sense, but we can join some harmonic passages with other tonal harmonic scheme...
Mozart1800 1 year ago
Arnold Schoenberg shreds:)
wojtekmetal 1 year ago
4:09!!!!
chrispalmo 1 year ago
EVERYONE JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, THIS MUSIC WAS MEANT TO SOUND THIS WAY. ITS CALLED SERIAL MUSIC. THIS WAS A PERIOD WHEN THEY THOUGHT JUST RANDOM NOTES WOULD EQUAL MUSIC.
percyjacksonrox98 1 year ago
I don't understand this song...
mezanw 1 year ago
Why six? Six Little Feces? Was he constipated that day?
sevenonpaper1 1 year ago
@sevenonpaper1 haha i was not prepared for this im gonna be giggling all day now
Xalex209X 1 year ago
yeah.. right.. get real.
eaglesonofwill 1 year ago
crap
babichrook 1 year ago
The 20th century was a time of war, chaos, and increased industrialization. It seems appropriate to me that dark, dissonant music would be created during such uncertain times. It doesn't invalidate earlier music or the music of other cultures, but I do hear it as a viable alternative.
Modes9 1 year ago
He was genious, not mad man.
e6e2e3e1 2 years ago
my gun
efngn 2 years ago
Beautiful :)
UserID20 2 years ago
someone just kill the one sitting on that chair!
MarvinCelosky 2 years ago
@MarvinCelosky
No, rather: someone just kill that chair!
DrMerkwuerdichliebe 2 years ago 2
Atonality will crumble.
wefasdf23 2 years ago
close your eyes and imagine a guy stuck in a mansion, thinking someone is gonna kill him anytime... this piece of art is perfect in describing emotion
gufok 2 years ago
What most of you undeveloped people don't realize is that music is almost like that of a skill. it has to be trained and developed. this song is very spiritually, musically, and technically advanced. you don't like it because your still stuck on baby stuff and will only listen to what is pleasing to the ear. it must be hard to express yourself through music with such limitations. if your stuck in pure tonality, you are only hearing about 1% of what music is really out there. no exaggeration.
OmegasWill 2 years ago 3
True man, I find it pretty ignorant.
That so many people love music,yet they dont want to explore it in a deeper sense.
LowEndDream 2 years ago 16
why is atonal better than tonal?
mizutofu 2 years ago
its not any better or worse... atonal is simply a reaction to tonal music... like the anti-art after ww1... its interpreted differently and judged differently...
louis621 2 years ago 4
@louis621 it is not really interpreted differently... Schoenberg himself used to say that his music is romantic, so it must be played like that. it's a kind of late Brahms, or even Chopin.
felipesarro 1 year ago
@mizutofu: Atonal isn't better, it's worse. There's a reason why the music of cultures all over the world, and for centuries, is tonal. Because certain frequencies have ratios to others that blend nicely and are pleasant to listen to. Atonal is dissonant and unpleasant to listen to. And while that last characteristic may be used to good effect for short periods of time in certain pieces of music to invoke some kind of disagreeable mood, it's just plain ugly for entire pieces of music.
Elhardt 2 years ago
@Elhardt why listen then?
mogueyou 2 years ago
Atonal music it's not made to "pleasant". It's an artistic and revolutionary movement in music and if you see the time that serialism born, it match to many artistic movements with the same "intention". Dont listen to this, trying to hear a beatiful music to your ears... Its beatiful in a way of thinking, not acusticaly. By the way, tonal music is not natural ok? tempered tuning it's very distant from "acustic" perfection...
gabrieloni 1 year ago
@Elhardt
This is obviously abrasive and ugly music. But that in no way what so ever means that it isn't amazing.
If you've ever enjoyed a movie like 'Silence of the Lambs", or 'Fargo' then you understand my meaning.
With music some people can only see the musicality in Disney cartoons (there equivalent). Others such as myself and many of the other people posting here understand that just because something is ugly, does not mean it is not beautiful.
EuphoricDan 1 year ago
Can you describe what you get out of listening to this sort of thing? I've been a musician most of my life, but I enjoy beautiful melodies, lyrics and so on. I am prepared to admit that I don't have the musical intellect to appreciate eg Coltrane, Zappa and others, but I would be interested to know why those that do enjoy it. I can enjoy tension in music, but only with resolution. Can you enlighten me?
yaisum 1 year ago
Firstly, I do not find this music particularly tense, at least not compared to the convulse tonal music that preceded it. Listen to Schoenberg's first (wholly tonal) String Quartet if you want to hear something truly unintelligible and tense. Secondly, I enjoy it for the same reason why I enjoy all other music, I recognize the human intelligence behind it, I find such challenging music far more beautiful than the vacuous garbage that is minimalism, for example.
Nachtmarchen 1 year ago
@yaisum the same artistic flavour can be taken out of this sort of music, as can from extreme metal, and distortion etc. brain craves new sound, something different, something new and exciting and something raw. this music fits those categories well
elliotgoodger 1 year ago
@yaisum Nobody with a musical intellect would like Frank Zappa...
minedarea 6 months ago
try listening to Debussy's Prelude. he was on of the starting composers of the atonal revolution but his music is much more conventional
steadric 2 years ago
@steadric mm. I've often thought that any chord taken out of context from Berg's Sonata op.1 would not be out of place in a Debussy piece.
hexachordal 1 year ago
@hexachordal imy grandmother once mistook it for rhapsody in blue actually
cnmaster01 1 year ago
@mizutofu why is tonal better than atonal?
cnmaster01 1 year ago
We studied him for GCSE
loisjomm 2 years ago
Schoenberg is very sick...
maxhansendk 2 years ago
can someone tell me if this is a serialist piece please..
JamIsOnToast123 2 years ago
No, its straight atonal.
jojomellon 2 years ago
no es serialismo. es atonalismo libre. es la etapa anterior al dodecafonismo. en éstas piezas schoenberg trabaja con "sets de sonidos" que guardan entre sí una relación interválica.
ignacio270 2 years ago 3
... interesante, la verdad no escucho relacion alguna, supongo que habria que tener la partitura para hacer el analisís y alguien como usted me explique cual es la relación, sea como sea, tiene un aire muy diferente este tipo de musica, para mi es como si tensionara los sonidos y luego los "aliviara" osea causara un efecto agradable para volverlo a tensionar y asi va, asi lo describiria yo
Carlosbassman9886 2 years ago
la verdad, no es fácil escuchar a primera audicion dichas relaciones interválicas. sobre todo cuando los "sets de alturas" estan tocados en distintos registros. por ej: si un set tiene 3 notas(por ej do reb mi) y suena el Mi en el registro grave,el Reb en el registro medio,y el Do en el agudo, ahi se hace muy difícil de escuchar. pero cuando dicho set aparece en un mismo registro, es más facil de escuchar. de todas formas hace falta "acostumbrar el oído" a ésta música.que es bellìsima!
ignacio270 2 years ago 2
Yes, it seems as these pieces are serialistic using Schoenbergs very own 12-tone technique.
Fuglebolle 2 years ago
I'm not sure if Schoenberg had developed his 12-tone technique yet when he composed the six little pieces. I could be wrong, however. :P
lentoagitato 2 years ago 2
I think you're right.. Wikipedia said they're composed in 1911, and he didn't come up with the 12-tone technique before 1921 or so
Fuglebolle 2 years ago
You've got to love wikipedia...
lentoagitato 2 years ago
hehehehehehe
vincecharus 2 years ago
Arnold Schoenberg is absolutely incredible, his music really is an insight into the madness of his own mind hahaha, sometimes I wish a few more people could feel the 'madness' though...
it's a bit lonely being the only teenager who likes him XD
PickUpYourLighters 2 years ago
Trust me, you're not his only teenage fan! :P
jazzlover06 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
PickUpYourLighters 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
O.O *blink*
*hug* ^_^
Am I still his only teenage metalhead fan? =P
PickUpYourLighters 2 years ago
Nor his only teenaged metalhead fan, :D
AMRadioHits 2 years ago
i'm 18 and i enjoy his music.
haha, i was introduced to it in a music class i'm taking in college
marudell 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Schoenberg es una mierda!!!!!
bien por la chica
k4lasama 2 years ago
I love Arnold Schoenberg and this piece is still so beautiful she played it very nicly..
thatsme92 2 years ago
Damn squeaky chair!
thecurlsofrage 3 years ago 3
HAHAHA...I know:)
DulceMariaEv 2 years ago
yea its an acquired taste. Taste like foam.
gattij1 3 years ago 3
hahahaha
MinisterofScissors 2 years ago
Sehr Langsam doesn't sound to bad. I can't beleive i've got to play the fourth one o_O
ohbugger18 3 years ago
i understand how it works you know, like only 12 notes throughout the whole piece. but to me music needs a key... atonal sounds bad to listen to, that's why key signatures were actually found. well i'm not going to say anything else on it, everyone has their own opinion.
i find the pianists who perform serialism much more interesting than the music. they make it interesting to watch.
toxiclottie 3 years ago
but i think if u are open for it and get used to this kind of music it will sound better and better to your ears... a few years ago i found this kind of music simply horrible... although i must admit that i miss some rythm in this... so maybe future composer can make further work on this
WeibchenOfDeath 3 years ago
It's an acquired taste that not many will pick up.
Personally, I like it.
ShutUpNShred 3 years ago 3
hahahahahahah what the hell is this?
meluaz 3 years ago
yourforte..."serious videos" sometimes produce a good laugh, the other day some nut translated "..con un detto sol tu puoi, le mie pene consolar" as, "...with just a word you can console my penis" our Italian friends probably got a good laugh from that!!
awixa2 3 years ago 3
I don't like using 'lol'... but LOL
yourforte 3 years ago
yourforte, I'd as soon listen to fingernails being dragged across a chalkboard as listen to Schoenberg; as for G. Clooney, naked or otherwise, thanks but no thanks...he was a good comic in the old Emergency Room series, but hasn't done well since.
awixa2 3 years ago
Me too. I don't want to look at George Clooney naked - or any other man for that matter. I wasn't clear what a naked George Clooney had to do with Schoenberg anyway. Something about my apparently being a 'convent girl'. I always find it laughable when people resort to infantilia just because you don't like what they profess to like. I didn't expect it on 'serious' videos though.
yourforte 3 years ago 2
Lol, OK yourforte, you're forgiven...I just listen mostly to "Wir Setzen Uns..." frm ST. Matthew anyhow, it's pretty great...cheers
awixa2 3 years ago
awixa2, thank you for forgiving me. My remarks were directed at ad80ad because he thought listening to Schoenberg ought to be as pleasurable as looking at George Clooney naked. I don't like Schoenberg and I have no desire to look at George Clooney naked. Apparently this makes me a 'convent girl' with no heart...
yourforte 3 years ago
Schoenbergs piano music sounds like a cat (or dog) ambling up and down the keyboard...may sound good to the cat, but sounds like s..t to me, but I'm pretty unsophisticated!
awixa2 3 years ago
My cat doesn't like it either..
yourforte 3 years ago
awixa2 - I suspect you aren't at all unsophisticated. There was more gift in one of Bach's Little Preludes than there was in the whole of Schoenberg's oeuvre. And if you want to hear some chromatic notes that work, listen to Webern's orchestration of Bach's Ricercare. Btw, I've just pilched Ruhe Sanft from Bach's St Matt Passion from your favourites.
yourforte 3 years ago
Get a life ad80ad. Your views are cr*p and your remarks are juvenile
humpitydumpity1 3 years ago 2
furtivotrix, I said music isn't JUST for the mind - not that it's not for the mind at all. Atonal music would never have won over tonal music; it sounds horrible, that's why. Serialism, for example, was developed as a way to organise music. And it succeeds at that. Most serialist music sounds horrible, however. Music is answerable to the ear. Composers, fortunately, are now coming to terms with that. This work is no longer contemporary: it's nearly 100 yrs old. The Emperor's New Clothes...
yourforte 3 years ago
AHHHHHHHAHAHAH...it sounds horrible to the ears...ahahahah...it is like to say that to see Jessica Alba naked looks horrible to the eyes (in your case...George Clooney?)...this bullshit about "to sonund horrible" is only an academic moralistic matter between convent girls, fortunately intelligent people doesn't wast their time thinking about what is licit and not licit in music. If i see a woman naked leg at the cinema and I'm a moralist I don't say:"It is horrible" buahuahuaha
ad80ad 3 years ago
"It sounds horrible to the ears" is logical nonsense and I would never have written it. I don't like looking at Jessica Alba or George Clooney naked - mind your own business about that. I played these pieces for my Grade 8 many years ago. Fortunately I no longer have to pretend to like them. 'Licit' and 'illicit' are not terms that make sense in regard to music. So please don't put illogical sentences into my mouth
yourforte 3 years ago
"It sounds horrible", sorry fot the logical nonsense...probably logic is your first quality, before having a heart.Don't you like looking at George Clooney? You confirm what I said: you are a convent girl. Good for you...fortunately the world today is going another way. We are in 2008, and your moralism sounds a bit outadet.But you know...while you pasturing in your academism, someone other outside your little world enjoys himself and attempts to realize his dreams.WAKE UP!
ad80ad 3 years ago
I'm not a convent girl.Mind your own business.Whether or not I like looking at George Clooney naked is none of your business.Whether or not I have a heart is none of your business.However, I wouldn't be a musician if I didn't have a heart.I AM logical,however,so don't put illogical words into my mouth.And, let's face it, not many people like this music.And it's about 100 years old-so you needn't talk about MY views being outdated.Music has emerged from the bleakness of the early 20th century
yourforte 3 years ago
how does one get to be a musician?
DreamedOfHugeSpiders 3 years ago
You eat a lot of pancakes
Smaejdah 3 years ago 6
the rubbery home-made kind or the papery crispy duck kind? wanna do things right.
DreamedOfHugeSpiders 3 years ago
Both, you mix them together ;) :D
Smaejdah 3 years ago
ok thanks. i'll set to work. :)
DreamedOfHugeSpiders 3 years ago
haha:D go make som pancakes! would have been cool if it worked though :P
Smaejdah 3 years ago
That's pretty awesome. Really weird though. In a good way.
prandtastic 3 years ago
I know, let's all start a shitstorm for the people who like atonal music! I personally think atonal music is more of a musical experiment and you have to look at it from the perspective that it's intention is not the same as most tonal music. You can't compare schoenberg to bach, although i do agree i wouldn't put on serialism to relax.
DylanCobb 3 years ago
Hehe, i wonder if Bach would be glad if someone told him that they used his music as a sleeping pill :D (relax.. ;) )
Smaejdah 3 years ago
Well now, the problem with this post is that you've said that music has an 'intention'.
Some music is functional.
Some music isn't.
it's all music.
eoghdes18 2 years ago 2
i honestly do.. just think about that last statement you made, that music isn't for the mind. Really.. come on now. this kind of stuff makes me wonder what mainstream music would sound like if atonal had won over tonal music. your opinion would be quite different, as would all opinions. but that is exactly the point. everyone is entitled to their opinion.
furtivotrix 3 years ago
Impressive playing, but who in all honesty likes this 'music'? The time has come to admit that the foregoing of tonality had a disastrous effect on 20th century music. Thank goodness composers are starting to come to their senses. Music is for the ear, not just for the mind.
yourforte 3 years ago
no offense but thats 1) factually false and 2) a totally subjective opinion of yours based on absolutely nothing except your own closed mindedness and prudishness. the end.
LackingLack0 3 years ago
Sorry, LackingLack - what's 'factually false'?
yourforte 3 years ago
LackingLack - I believe this remark is indeed offensive to yourforte. At least s/he has the integrity to admit that this music sounds horrible.
iddyumpty 3 years ago 2
This may be a good performance but the music is horrible
humpitydumpity1 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yea I would love to se her playing mozart not this carp
juaneco1980 3 years ago
what's the difference between a good performance and good music?
lantheman9 3 years ago 2
a good performance of "bad" music doesn't make the music better...it just makes the performance good.
There are technical aspects of both performing and music that make them something "good".
This is both a good performance and good music because the performer is trained in what she's doing and doing it well and the music isn't just noise. Shoenberg wrote music based on a system...he didn't just hit keys and call it music...which is still an acceptable form of the art.
MinisterofScissors 3 years ago 2
sure, there is something fishy about schönberg. but some of us like fish.
bingobongo 2 years ago 24
=))
selfrighteous88 2 years ago
"Music is for the ear, not just for the mind."
Nice bumper sticker. What does it even mean?
kristopaivinen 3 years ago 3
Serialism FTW
undergroundcry44 3 years ago 2
I thought you did a pretty good job. The music is so precise, it must be hard to get every tempo change and every dynamic. Well done. I did think that many of the tempi were a little too slow. When it's that slow, it's hard to hear the phrases and the development of the themes. Also, I think the rests are pretty important formally, so it might be helpful to place them a little bit more precisely.
I hope you keep working on it. I like the piece.
timpanimike 3 years ago
In my opinion, she can't to give an artistic and good interpretation of these pieces
Mozart1800 3 years ago
oh shut up harry i personally love it :]
mattcookie 3 years ago 5
well matt you're wierd
3hlang 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what amazes me is that people actually applaud at the end, as if she has shown some sort of skill.
what you should do is make these pieces so little that they cant be heard. then you wont make my ears bleed
3hlang 3 years ago
You just don't get it, you ain't got no sense of what music's all about. That's why you're amazed at the applause. Simple as that.
Thanatherion 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i just like to enjoy listening to music. i dont enjoy this. OK she did show some skill but if she made a mistake or was just making it up, nobody would no because it is not distinctive or tonal or annything that music should be.
3hlang 3 years ago
i suppose that's somewhat true...the bit about not being able to tell if she made a mistake or made it up. But, although I personally don't like this type of music, she did a lovely job playing it.
dgioe 3 years ago