So basically, structuralism supports a intercontextualization of reality? That is, a thing is what it is because of what it is not? And what it is not must be for the the thing to be what it is? If so, my question is; does structuralism go to the other extreme and focus on the whole as contrasted with previous idealistic thinkers who focused on the parts/ the self? Is there a middle way where both are just one process?
So basically, structuralism supports a intercontextualization of reality? That is, a thing is what it is because of what it is not? And what it is not must be for the the thing to be what it is? If so, my question is; does structuralism go to the other extreme and focus on the whole as contrasted with previous idealistic thinkers who focused on the parts/ the self? Is there a middle way where both are just one process?
tatsumakisempyukaku 1 month ago
Is there a continuation, I mean a lecture on poststructuralism?
pawsoned 1 year ago