Added: 2 years ago
From: trippy123
Views: 201,240
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (198)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • they never relase the high resolution pics so u cant say they told us or showed us everything

  • @soap1st they release high res pics, they just photoshop em first. I know its not tricks of light like the face on mars, on the high res pis the whole shape vanishes. They remove the stuctures. Guess thats easier than making tthem look naural ;)

  • OMG O_o

  • can do without the music.

    if your images are not enough, adding a beat ain't gonna make your message any stronger,

  • NASA geologist farouk elbaz,did say that not all discoveries made on the moon have been made public.

  • @wegggie ye good one , i like to see nasa explain that. trust me tey dont , mailed tons of mails too them , according them you need a telesecoop on earth with a diameter of 116 meters. with my own telescoop of 130mm i can zoom very close already. bunch of liars , geuss tey want to keep the flow of tax money.

  • They cleverly covered up the giant conspiracy by releasing all of these photos to the public. That's SO devious.

  • scv ready to go !

  • @wegggie google earth is not all satellites they drive around cars taking pics or somthing ive seen one og the cars my self

  • @BrockTheRockTv HAHAHA... dude theres a difference between google street view and google earth..

  • Lol check out this vid for more strange things on the moon

    watch?v=qwNqPNdEsOQ

  • to be continued...?

  • I think many of these things are opctical illusion, but i wouldn´t bet any cent that ALL are opctical illusion! ;-)

  • @wegggie The cars aren't 300,000 miles away.

  • @JIMINIK1 You should study some astromomy and imaging before you post ignorant comments. The photos were taken by the NASA Lunar Orbiter Camera that even 45 years ago had a resolution of down to 1 meter (3.3 "). You should be able see NASA giving you a one finger salute with that capability!

  • @JIMINIK1 yes but sattelites can travel 300,000 miles. They're are supposedly two sattelites already past pluto and are still going , I have no doubt that nasa or some other group could have a moon orbiting sattelite . hmmm is right .

  • I love watching this video.

  • In the 2nd world war aerial 3d stereoscopic photos were used to identify V2 rocket sites and other nazi installations. It's a pity we can't compile similar images for these sites of interest. Sadly these anomalies in 2d, are just that.

  • @wegggie Conspiracy to keep us from discovering the truth. x

  • @wegggie deep, but not that deep, in your mind you already KNOW why :-)

  • great vid and great choice in music...

  • go to google earth moon look at the block out long line zoom in and you will see base all over

  • There were 45 tapes of Apollo 11 video that were erased. Not just 1 or 2 tapes. So does that sound like an embarrassi­ng accident or something else to you? Gees,

    'The Wizzard of Oz' and 'Gone With The Wind' have survived to date!

  • ground at the same speed they would on Earth?  That would make the sand particles weigh 10X more than a suited 180lb man. Also, a five inch 'Moon Rock' would weigh more than a ton on Earth! And for Gawds sake, where are the stars?

    Additionally, on a totally flat surface Moon one would be able to see for miles into the background horizon. In the original footage everything ends where the starless background meets the sand. And again, I'd be spinning around filming in 360 not a footprint

  • Here's 1 to think about: did the moon landing ever happen?

    If you were at the Grand Canyon would you film a panoramic or just focus in on what's between the 2 sides of the gape. The Moon has NO atmosphere, so what nearly blew the [straight-starched edge] flag off the pole. How could NASA have LOST the original film footage? If the Moon has no gravity and a 180lb man needed weighted boots to keep from flying into space, how come when he leaps and lands the tiny particles of sand hit the

  • Re: wegggie. I understand what you wrote but you should have investigated what is normally common sense: G.E. satellite can [somewhat] target in on your car as it is 423 miles above the earth. The moon is 1.3 light-seconds or 238,857 miles from Earth. 238,857-423=238,434. So the G. Sat. is 238,434 miles from the moon.

    And different satellite telescopes have different magnification calibration. The higher the magnification the higher the $Price-Tag.

  • I'm a believer but these images are quite a stretch of the imagination. I've tried and tried but in this particular set of stills I don't see what anything convincing. And

    a weapons/defense installation, bridge and nuked city? If an intelligence is capable of space flight why would they need a bridge? Also, one would think that any weapons would be located on the flight craft. The tower (in other photos) is very curious. Domed cities? Don't see 'em either. Government cover-up..YES!

  • Some of these images are really artificial structures

  • I liked it. I wondered if anyone has been looking at the moon with a telescope lately? I am seeing an filming these huge spheres that are just under the moon an stationary. An frim thing's that are going on around my place from what I have filmed an seen, it looks like a communication link is being set up to them???? Please, go look at my channel, they are real! I am in a wheelchair or on crutches an I cant go anywhere! So on my channel everything is happening in the front yard!

  • Would love to see this close up

  • actually there are many casual forms, but why the alien constructions should be like ours?

    not necessary, can be camouflaged.

  • xD anomalies ellhnas eise?

    

  • @wegggie Simple, because the satellites are closer.... do you know the distance between earth and moon?

    384 400 km, satellite orbit distance, from 160km to 35.800 km. Right?

  • @caletedj Yeah but they have actually had orbitors around the moon take photos. They had one before the apollo missions, of course thats outdated technology

  • @wegggie these are images from the 'Orbiter' 1966. At the time computers as we know then did not exist and digital cameras were almost 3 decades away.

    If you check more recent and much clearer images from satellites that use modern technology (as opposed to tech closer related to a Box-Brownie camera) you'll find that these images are junk in comparison and a open to the imagination filling fantastical blank that aren't even there.

    ...oh wait the new images have the good bits photoshoped out

  • O espaço sideral, a Lua e os planetas coexistem com milhões de objetos e fraguimentos de satélites, de cometas que viajam pelo espaço sem fim. Na verdade o universo é bem agitado, tudo isso está em movimento constante, nada está parado. Então o que vemos nessas imagens é a pura imaginação dos homens que nunca conseguiram provar a existência de vida inteligente fora da Terra. É possível? sim, mas improvável. Nada se prova, mas é um bom passatempo. Divirtam-se.

  • NASA is full of lies, there is a video I watched were they saw some edited pictures from the picture of the moon presented by NASA. They also interviewed some people from NASA, some are retired and some are from organizations related to astronomy saying that there is indeed a life out there. Well this video and the description says it all, the conclusion is yours. I suggest try researching of you're still doubting

  • I noticed that nearly every picture has a dividing line in it with a small white cross-hair, and I wonder what that's about?

  • why are all the photos black and white and blurred. they could fly to moon but couldnt carry a decent camera??

  • @lodaxstax could have a lot to do with the technology available in 1966....

  • Check out my vid of a bridge or some kind of anomaly on the moon

    /watch?v=qM6JyPV1PRI

  • I WILL BUY A GOOD TELESCOPE THIS SUMMER, I WANT TO SEE THIS SO BAD, and why cant NASA land some robots on the moon and go to these strange "objects" to confirm what it is

  • @skaterride2

    NASA probably helped put them there.......see Bill Cooper's stuff on here for answers

  • @skaterride2 they probably have, they just won't share their info with people.

  • I WILL BUY A GOOD TELESCOPE THIS SUMMER, I WANT TO SEE THIS SO BAD

  • @skaterride2 If you get a big one you could be able to watch meny weird and interesting forms on the Moon, at least using an 6 or an 8 inch with good quality optics you´d be able to see good details on the surface. I do the same some times with my home made 6 inch newtonian, take some pics or video clips then analyze them on my Pc.

  • i dont know.....if they have the ability to photograph a black spot on the SUN!!! dont you think someone.....anyone would be able to photograph these "things" on the moon for christs sake.....maybe its just me.

  • VERY COOL VIDEO! WHERE DID YOU GET THE IMAGES FROM??? PLEASE EMAIL ME WITH LINK? THANKS

  • N ever

    A

    S traight

    A  nswer

  • Read some of Zechariah Sitchen's work and it will explain these anomalies, very interesting stuff. Scientists don't take his work seriously but they can't seem to explain it so give it a try esp. if you like Sci-fi or just science and archaeology.

  • Some scale and analysis would be nice

  • slow slow more slow porca troia

  • Hexagon crater at 5:14 - just like the hexagon on the north pole of Saturn. The electric Universe theory claims that plasma discharges create hexagonal features - but how?

  • like the choone

  • Excellent and amazing! 

  • Fantastic! had to pause quite a bit of the first minute because there is so much to look at, it was fucking awesome!! 5 stars just in the first minute!!!!

  • trippy123 your right on. keep up the good work and opening of everyones eyes

  • @fffuckutube299 That image from ESA website is a joke (not your perspective, that is completely correct). How can they think they can get away with such amateur touching up of an image that is clearly hiding something. Not so sure about the pill theory but there is definatly something being scrubbed at that spot. good find on the photo, i'd love to see the original, as would the worlds public i imagine.

  • What kind of telescope will it take to make pictures that give really sufficient detail to actual recognize building structures? Will those big ones situated on mountain tops like the ones in hawaii do the job?

  • i think this guy had no time making a docu, so he did it this way.

  • At 0:21, you can see that outlining with a digital marker is no good here. This image has been manipulated and is therefore deemed tainted and unworthy of serious consideration and scrutiny.

  • search "esa smart-1 lunar south pole" first hit sould be the esa's website with a jpeg mosaic, if you download it and zoom in 100% on microsoft office piture manager and go to the bottom right corner. Now go 4 pictures to the left in the mosaic and you will find that someone dropped a giant pill next to the shadow of a humanoid object. Don't know if the hamanoid object is a trick of light but that pill is clearly visible. someone dropped their pill on a tiny moon model durring the photo

  • If you mess with the contrast and brightness you can make out some really amature "MS Pait-esque" airbrushing all throughout the mosaic. It will aslo make the humanoid shadow more defined.

  • wouldnt it be crazy if the whole solar system even the sun was just some alien experinment to learn about some thing or they just like playing god who knows

  • @John7Shepard

    i think 'they' work much slower than us... its like how we feel that microbes reproduce at a faster rate and pollute a subject area, we're probably polluting the earth... sigh...

  • nice work!!!

  • @candr Ahh but also more detectable. Even for hubble "They Claim" can't see the apollo landings. A person with descent telescope can make out the most smallest object in Leo. The actual best place to spy on us would be inside the earth cause were always looking out we never look in. And if and when we do any major discovery is instantly black and dissapers from all record.

  • @jb42682 You don't know about the trains and underground city's 100's of miles in the earth?

  • @R3ptilian Trains? I'm sure there's bunkers and extensive transportaion between them. But if you mean advanced they don't need trains.

  • super video nicely done!I wish i was an astronaut,I'd demand to go to the moon with a my laptop and webcam and skype whats on there.It's strang that they never go back,was they warned off by a civilisation that live there?Are these discs taking oxygen,water,gas,electricity from our atmosphere?

  • AmazingI wish i could go to the moon.

  • O cara deu nome variado a diversas crateras ¬¬

    Se fosse um hotel, tipo um palace eu até ficava de boa...

    mas são imagens manchadas, possivelmente editadas,

    que não provam nada o.o

    tem vídeos melhores no Youtube xD

  • if you wanted to spy on earth the moon would be the most logical place to set up shop.

  • watched it about the 5th time, began seeing what you were pointing out.

    great work.

    would like to know what music is on in the background, you also have a great taste in music.

  • My comment didn't post (and I just read some of what you write here, so I'm glad to read what you wrote and then repost anyway. Namaste).

    I think that a lot of the images here can be at least hypothetically debunked by "chaos theory", but...numerous images boggle the mind of a skeptic. So kudos for your collection. It's beyond "conspiracy theory".

  • I just want to say, and I'll keep it brief (smiley face wink wink), a lot of the images here can be at least hypothetically debunked by "chaos theory", but...there are numerous images that surely boggle even the greatest skeptic.

  • There is one picture here listed as 'nuked city; who would of nuked it? Please science in heaven don't say us!

  • @sailbeyondthesunset probly just a name like how it looks or some thing

  • nice work :D

    

  • not convinced by some of these but some are undeniable! nice work :D

  • erm nice video that last picture 9:42 it`s someting like " wtf lol?! " hehehehe

  • the "mine" is one of the most interesting areas ive seen so far in all footage of the moon, it shows water like drainage marks and obvious structures and buildings. I wonder if the hexagon shapes are linked to saturns hexagon at its south pole???

  • excellent job dude!

  • Just the idea of building anything this hufe on a planet that has absolutely no ressources is not logical, not something any kind of civilisation would do. It is non-sens. These ''buildings'',,,,where did all the ressources to build come from? witch leaves us to thinking that maybe it all came from Mars, the ressoiurces, yeah? Its my new thory: humanoids used to live on Mars as on Earth, and when it became unhabitable they moved to the Moon and created an atmosphere here !...or not.

  • your a very dedicated person to have done this much work...keep it up! :)

  • i think there are domes and ridges because shadows can freeze u upto 200 degrees below zero and sun exposure burns you up to 200 degrees above zero

  • Go to my channel: (2knowfun2 ) and watch the video: Universe (the creation of universe and life) If you watch this video you will understand the creation of universe, creation of life and creation of water in 3 min! Everything is very easy to understand! I have produced all the videos by myself...

    subscribe, rate and commment thx ( watch my other videos too)

    my channel: ( 2knowfun2 )

  • Oh well the moon base exist 4 a while anyways

  • Can someone tell me what´s this i´ve found on Google-Moon:

    74°47'7.96"S 122°52'54.86"E

    Maybe i was getting stupid but it looks like an Space-Station with Gateway to some Aircraft, before the Gateway there was some tower??Basegateway left from the landing Pad.

    Builldings near that?: 87°40'21.97"S 72°25'47.24"W

    What is this about, maybe image processing anomalies or strange rock formations, my fantasy,...Look it up for yourself

  • I am sure the Governmentsfrom all over the world has a Safe place on the moon, for when they destruct the world and start their own world. If I had the power, I would inspect the Moon a little more closely. Only if we could?????????????

  • I have a question. Why the hell should they build the bases so far from eachother ?:D

  • monsanto is a real monster corp.

  • great video

  • The beggining soundtrack,was from transformers

  • Great film .... background music needs some help!

  • Part 1 Mysterious Mars Lecture Dr Tom Van Flandern

  • i looked around There is a Voice Anomely On google saying "We need More Units" Fake Or real i do not know but he said in the side bar "a big battle took place" so maybe he is right look at the evidence were not the only race here if you think about it were just one peace of dirt in a big universe so before jumping to conclusions Just look up evidence it would help alot

  • ok im a beliver, but i hate that you fade the pictures when you are zooming on them i mean, damn, let me see the detail of the picture and you blur it and change it..... i mean is a pretty great work but if you are zooming in let the zoomed view stay a little longer! FTW

  • spectacular!

  • more more more!!!

  • wow

  • Whens Google Moon gonna be coming out!!

  • An old Chinese biz acquaintance from Manchuria, China said he already bought equity, offered from America, for the Moon. Chinese are real optimists and great gamblers with passion for high risks. (Remember China had loaned most to US government by buying the bonds.)

    So that first Chinese takeaway on the moon will serve "Yang Chow Fried Rice" the most popular dish on all takeaway menu outside China!

    Maybe the Space Aliens could be tempted :-)

  • @CommanderUTube

    Yeah and whats gonna be one of the ingredients for that fried rice? Humans! LOL

  • Wait till the Chinese go to the moon. They will be surprised by what they find.

  • lol, they already there..the Moon River chinese takeaway...is just waiting to open for buisness.

  • Ha, that's a good one. Chinese can't even drive simple compact cars here on Earth, how do you expect them to fly rockets up into space anytime soon?

  • aristotel the greek filosopher remarked that the moon was once beautiful and look alote like a miniearth ,so whatever happend it happend before this time obviously! I enjoy the fact that "normal" people r looking into things like this cause we all know we cant trust goverments & established counsels that r so caled official so it's up to us to find our earths(including everthing around it )history :-)

  • Great Video...... Tnx for Posting.... Music is good ...who is it ? LM

  • The Doves-Kingdom of Rust :-)

  • Tnx for the information.... LM

  • What u say about the moon be colorfull?

    if the moon is colorful so what the hell is that grey thing I see in the sky every fking night?

    I mean, nasa really lie about alot of shit like mars the moon, the UFOs, I really belive in all this but, claim that the moon is a colorfull place is a little too much dont u agree?

  • @Hellhazerbr

    Why The Moon Appears Grey From Earth

    /watch?v=4PNjm9_Kzu8

    Peace

  • Also the moon is not grey, it is very colourful, they lie to us about nearly everything.

    There's also craters that appear and disappear, therefore that rules out that they are all caused by meteors.

    We are not only being denied what is out there but also possibly our history.

  • wow yes!! Totally agree! but the truth will out :o) It always does!

  • some off the pic, are the same, I check it.

  • a couple of those pics look a little wierd. But, what makes the others "anamolous"?

  • I went to this website and "Lunar Orbitor photographic..."and down loaded 1000s of white Orbs in long columns, singled out alone or inside crators. Some large see through phenomenon that were greyish and were like honey combed masses. Some of the orbs were linked together in 3s or 5s ... did you see these? Why aren't they in your vid?

  • Link please. If you downloaded thousands of videos, that is a lot for us to look through. A link or two would be nice.

  • I can look on google earth and clearly see the tree in the garden and my car. Yet although all these pictures on various sites are taken much closer to the moon/mars because of their lower mass they are always blurred at ground level. This speaks volumes. Think about it. Case closed.

  • ALL this moon pics where made 40 years ago. so yea, no HD back then :)

  • Sorry. I am remarking about Recent HD images from moon/mars.

  • that is an interesting point. I never thought about it like that. But it makes sense. They do not want the public privy to certain information

  • well then, you can't look at recent images taken on the moon or mars. not yet. maybe in about 10 years you'll see the pics taken today. same happened with the Apollo landings. but alot of the pics taken back then have smudges on them, like they erased things they didn't want us to see :\

  • the dual hexagon crater @ 05:12 is weird

  • Thanks for posting this. The Bible clearly states that in the last days we will see signs and wonders.

  • are you really stupid enough to believe a 2000 year old jewish book of fairytales that has been edited and changed hundreds of times will tell us when the world will end?

    Religion is a belief for emotional confort, science is fact. Remember that.

  • First of all, thanks for posting it. It's actually a well-done work.

    To tell you the truth I do not know what think about. It could be only figment of our imagination or we really can see something happening there; it depends on our minds. But for sure, what we know about the Moon (and the space, as well) is only an iota of what NASA "want" us to know.

  • Great pixs.... I like the music too... LM

  • Nice collection of images.

  • anyone read the lost book of enki?

  • Click on 'pause' to see each picture, and study it for awhile. I think thats how professionals do it when they study photos and what not. straight lines, big square, rectangular, triangular objects, ect wouldnt probably appear naturally on the surface of a planet.

  • Fuck i dont know.. From the pictures I can;t see shyt. With all the telescope technology and camera's we still can't zoom in and see these clearly... Wtf someone spend some money and time on new equipment for fucksakes

  • great film great track*****cheers man

  • ....... Even if fiction, it is surely pleasant fiction, if not a brilliant find. Thank you sir/mam. And thank you again.

  • Fantastic little video, but a stupid question question! Of course you should make another, and include every one of your photos. Might I marvel? It seems so strange that perhaps the greater portion of American humanity is hypnotically fixated upon the telly, stuffing hotdogs into their faces, watching trite news, sports, or mythbusters, and generally not engaging in anything substantially creative. And yet still! They attack those who take their time to make something neat.

  • Precisely put-U MUST BE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST.LOL

    I would not be surprised if that missile the US shot into the moon was TO DESTROY SOMETHING OR GIVE SOMEONE A WARNING.NOT to look for water.I can believe anything about this lying piece of shit

    government.

  • muy bueno,¿que porras pasa en la luna?

  • I didn't understand the video.

  • Pause each image moment between 8-12seconds (for a quick and easy example) and you will see there's things on the moon that contain geometric shape, structure and design. These things are clearly there and you can investigate it for yourself just like I did to see what shouldn't be there, but it.

    Excellent Video Trippy123 (please check my channel too)

  • Excellent work my friend! Very nicely done!

  • Great compliment after seeing your own fantastic videos. Thank you :)

  • Smiley faceLOL nice vid man

  • all those smudges by nasa photos is proof enough to me. ya dont smudge out hundreds of pics if theres nothing there to smudge. der. aliens are real and not all are friendly. ronald reagan even said that basically in his alien speech.

  • Its not like the moon controls our earths gravity or anything.Who needs tides.

  • A lot of pics do seem strange and abnormal.

    A lot of pics are over fantasized.

    Come on!!!!

    But still very interesting. If not ours, our governments still

    have to explain a lot, probably they have been lying so long,

    that telling the truth would break down society.

    If so pritty sad world we live in. Holding humanity, instead of pushing faster foward.

    If et they will be looking at us with astonishment, pitty and great amusement.

    mjcuracao

  • hey what is this music???

  • Doves - Kingdom Of Rust (Prins Thomas Mix) - It's a cracker eh! :)

  • @trippy123  I really like it!

  • ive got some cosmic ideas myself ; ) but i dont feel like telling them lol, dont wanna get stolen

  • If I learned that the end of the world was coming somehow, and that I knew everything on earth would be destroyed, I would leave a message on moon for the new generations.

    trippy123, what if we are/were the ones who built those?

  • I think the people who took these into consideration as things other than craters, beleive that these are indeed our structures, and what better place to keep them than the moon?

    however, it wouldnt (and/or isnt) for the reason to rebuild the human race, per se, as that is impossible, as far as we know, which apparently is very little. But If earth were destroyed, the moon too would be destroyed, and the loss of it's gravitational pull would toss it into space. So, i'm very curious....

  • according to the videos i have seen, a meteorite big enough to destroy humanity wouldnt destroy earth, it would only burn the atmosphere. So anything that stands without oxygen or water would remain if the impact didn't destroy it, right? So i think if earth was burned, it would still gravitate around sun, and moon would still gravitate around it =). I love talking about this, give me your point on that :P

  • I think we are starting to evolve as a cosmic conscience (thank god) and we will learn new things we never thought possible.

    I just hope people like yourselves are helping to 'awaken' the sleeping masses - so they too can get up to speed before - who knows what will happen. Soon I believe - very soon! :)

  • @trippy123 COSMIC CONSCIOUSNESS means nothing more than being concious that we live in the universe with all its planets, stars, and galaxies. Stop listening to them new-age-of-aquarius-bla-bla-cr­eme-bla-meitreya-bli-bla-bla, they just want you confused to sell yopu the answers. Givin you the illusion of knowing something more than others, but actually you only learn more bullshit. No personal insult to you buddy, just advice!

  • Haha, well, it's all relative on a couple things. Say there's a scenareo in which there were a meteor 2x large enough to destroy earth were to hit it(what we'd consider a small planetoid), and it were to hit in the direction away from the sun.

    Also, the moon moves away from earth ever so slightly, about 1.5 inches per year, meaning that it's gravitational pull is weak anyway, so, if the mass of earth is dispersed like that, the moons current velocity would swing it off into space somewhere.

  • :o the moon moves 1.5inches per year, then that means it must move like, even faster every year and so we cant leave a message there cuz itll probably be gone then. Aw :P

  • Well on a cosmic scale, it's nothing, but it is estimated that before the moon is even close to leaving earth, our own sun wouldve become a red giant and devoured most of the solar system already, so the moon leaving us isnt much of a problem anyway.

  • yeh, absolutely right

    one more question,

    is the moon essential to life on earth? affirming the humans wouldnt create something to replace it.

  • @tayeulecolis Earth could be destroyed into a million pieces, they would still gravitate around the sun, however, if the pieces were very small (due to a very large comet) some would fly away, and some would start orbiting the moon (the moons also has a gravity field),and the whole lot would still orbit the sun, but in a very different orbit.Anyway,for now we are lucky to have Jupiter,who takes almost all of the crashes for us, maybe the moon takes some too,or will take one big one, hopefully..

  • @Jayoono I've been studying this recently. The mass of an object capable of destroying earth would have to be so huge that it makes it unlikely to happen before any other world's end theory. But...

    According to the fact that asteroïds are rests of an impact between two large objects (most of them being planets ), an impact destroying Earth would throw the planet's pieces out of sun's orbiter. ( Exactly like any other asteroïds flying around the universe )

  • @tayeulecolis Well, a meteorite only the size of Texas almost eliminated all life on earth, so earth may be destroyed without breaking into a million pieces, that said, there are 3 ways to destroy our earth: comets, the sun, and man. The sun will destroy earth completely in 4 billion years, it may be possible for a comet to come first and take us out. Earth can be destroyed first by man, but this is different, because the earth as a planet will still exist.

  • @tayeulecolis On the question if the remaining debree will orbit the sun, I can answer you it will almost certainly will. Furthest planet is Pluto, debree would circle around planets it passes like Jupiter and Saturn with massive magnetic fields and gravity, thus orbiting the sun also. You say no asteroids are sensitive to gravitation and orbit? You do realise there is a giant asteroid belt circeling the sun between Mars and Jupiter? Also the Oortcloud and Kuiper belt orbit around the sun.

  • @Jayoono I see you did not understand what I meant. Here I'll explain again: The speed at which the debrees would be thrown would make them still affected by the magnetic fields, but only to change their orientation of a few degrees, meaning the sun is not strong enough to pull it back. Though this only applies on an object capable of destroying Earth in a million pieces. Smaller asteroids that would hit Earth would remain on it or around other planets.

  • @tayeulecolis I'm sorry,but what you say makes no sense. 'the speed of the debrees would make them affected by 'the...?' magnetic fields (of the sun, or the planets, or??), and change their 'orientation..?' (you mean distance to the sun?) by a few 'degrees' (or did you mean inclination?), meaning the sun is not strong enough to pull 'it..?' (what?) back. Smaller asteroids that would hit earth would remain on it (correct) or around other planets (incorrect,impact means they REMAIN on destination)

  • @Jayoono I seriously don't feel like explaining this... But fine I'll try again.

    1. The sun attracts objects because it has a magnetic field.

    2. All of the objects that pass near the sun are not necessarily graviting around it and too fast objects like the majority of asteroids just pass by.

    3. The magnetic field generated by the sun would still affect these objects, but only enough to change their "orientation" or "direction" by a few "degrees" like 360 degrees in a circle, but on a 3d mode.

  • @MCDavisFTW Therefore, as explained in #3, the sun's magnetic field would not be strong enough to pull the object back. ----> By pulling the object back it would force it into doing an arc around the sun exactly like a planet.

    4. Once again, Earth destroyed in a million pieces would not remain a destination; objects would be thrown in a multitude of directions at a very high speed, somes leading towards other planets' magnetic fields, and most towards the sun or even other solar systems.( ... )

  • i dont understand,

    why doesn´t they comming to the moon to see?

  • because they're probably the ones that built these things anyway.

  • NASA geologist farouk elbaz did say that not all discoveries made on the moon have been made public.

  • Absolutely! Same with Patrick Moore..and Carl Sagan - Sagan then changed his mind, why? ;)