And your statement around 9:12 shows your total closed mindedness to entertain ideas without accepting them by operating under another presupposition besides naturalism.
A theistic presupposition is more adapt to accept testimony as "empirical" evidence. [though we would never call it that, just using the word to relate.]
I do admit to personally being a creationist, but the video is ID, and is based on evidence, not on belief. ID can easily disprove YHWH.
You ignore that I have left my presupposition behind, and have operated under the naturalist presupposition just to find a middle ground, and to say I am stopping my ears and not wanting to hear another side, when I am totally operating by the other side, is shallow to say my friend.
I never proved any God in my video, I only showed it is more logical to conclude life as we know it was started by an eternal living form.
This whole video is addressing an argument that never happened. I never called the eternal living form supernatural. I never presented a supernatural situation, "reproduction" happens every day.
When I presented God in the video, I just stated it matched the definition. I did not say it was the only, and I did not say that it was or could only be YHWH.
And your statement around 9:12 shows your total closed mindedness to entertain ideas without accepting them by operating under another presupposition besides naturalism.
A theistic presupposition is more adapt to accept testimony as "empirical" evidence. [though we would never call it that, just using the word to relate.]
jazzyhap 2 years ago
No, being open-minded means that you consider different ideas, not that you accept them.
And the expectancy that accepting testimony as any kind of evidence is a good idea is exactly why theistic ideas are not science.
starfedrogue 2 years ago
I do admit to personally being a creationist, but the video is ID, and is based on evidence, not on belief. ID can easily disprove YHWH.
You ignore that I have left my presupposition behind, and have operated under the naturalist presupposition just to find a middle ground, and to say I am stopping my ears and not wanting to hear another side, when I am totally operating by the other side, is shallow to say my friend.
jazzyhap 2 years ago
Well, ID is creationism in a lab coat, isn't it?
starfedrogue 2 years ago
I never proved any God in my video, I only showed it is more logical to conclude life as we know it was started by an eternal living form.
This whole video is addressing an argument that never happened. I never called the eternal living form supernatural. I never presented a supernatural situation, "reproduction" happens every day.
When I presented God in the video, I just stated it matched the definition. I did not say it was the only, and I did not say that it was or could only be YHWH.
jazzyhap 2 years ago
Very nice series :) detailed and strong.
masticina 2 years ago