Added: 2 years ago
From: TheEternalUniverse
Views: 9,930
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (54)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Too be honest it just sounds like a slightly more powerful version of gravity with an opposite "pole". Like magnets.

  • Dark energy then must originate in the cores of all celestial objects in the universe. This is why the center points of the inflation was found to be located where mass is concentrated throughout the universe. The universe is inflating because new energy, heat, is being created. The universe then did not begin as being extremely hot but extremely cold and has gotten warmer over time, via gravity. Just an idea.

  • Dark energy defies the law of thermodynamics. If dark energy is a substance then in order for it to cause the universe to inflate the energy must be increasing in volume. The law of thermodynamics states that matter/energy cannot be created only converted. Yet the law itself also shows that energy can be created when gravity is used as the work force producing weight then pressure then heat, in that order of the formula. Heat is energy! So in fact the same law shows that energy can be created. 

  • SandustanBrasov

    And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!

    My e-mail: s.stan65@yahoo.com

    You Tube: sandustanBrasov’s Channel

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether

  • • SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The science has and history. In the Fundamental Principle of Democrit(470..380BC) it show:"From nothing nothing's born, nothing that exist can not be destroyed and any transformation consist from a reunion and separation...Out of atoms and ether. all rest is not otherwise than rationament and not exist...The spirit as well as the ether consist of a small and spherical atoms, very mobile, atoms that their movement form the phenomenon of life".

  • • SandustanBrasov

    It popularize the fantastical theories and stantardized theories with which it terrorize the inhabitants the Earth, after what Einstein with relativity theory had blocked the science of the century XX. Sptephen Hawking and roger Penrose had demonstrated in 1967 that the black holes proceed from the relativity theory. How it can conceive and it can say that the heart of the one black hole is a gravitational singularity whose volume tend to zero and whose mass tend to infinite?

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein.

  • • SandustanBrasov In 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.

    

  • But we know that already that nothings is static - meaning unchanging for very long - by simple observations. An uchanging state may last for some time only, but then expansion or contraction takes place. Look at nature, look even at a business. So it seems reasonable that hte same principle applies to the larger universe around us, too. Why do we need Einstein to explain the obvious, in my humble opinion.

  • @DrMMHMD I don't claim to be the most intellegent in the world and I respect your point of view. I'm not a scientist but I do have an associate degree in electronics. Maybe my idea is stupid but I would like to have an adult conversation without name calling. You didn't call me any name and I respect that. Tell me for my own education what's wrong with my idea that theremight be a lot of gas giants not orbiting any stars? There's brown dwarfs out there. Like I said I'm probably wrong.

  • Another thought on my other comments. We don't consider anything we see as dark matter after all we see it. We see most matter as a result of reflect light unless it's the sun, light bulb, TV picture, fire, etc... But how does a planet not orbiting any star reflect light? it can't! Therefore it is ORDINARY dark matter! I could still be wrong.

  • Refuring to my other comment you may say but gas giants have a lot less matter than stars. That's true but there may be a lot more gas giants than there are stars. It is said that there are twice as many brown dwarfs than stars. Then you may ask shouldn't gas giants block light produced by the stars? There may be masive gas giants as opposed to the stars but they're not next to each other. they would only form a screen that the stars can shine through. I's just my theory. I could be wrong.

  • Sometimes I wonder if this dark matter is merely a bunch of planets not orbiting any stars. We now know that brown dwarfs exist. Brown dwarfs form the same way stars do except there's less matter. If there's even less matter guess what? You have gas giants! A lot of brown dwarfs only emit infrared light. Gas giants don't emit ANY light although they produce heat. Maybe we're just assuming there's a lot of empty space between solor systems. There may be billions of planets not orbiting stars!

  • Everything spins in universe. All everything is doing is spinning around something in the center of the univerise. Like maybe the biggest black whole ever?

  • what if he is wrong?

    wouldnt that change everything?

  • it alway`s exiisted before the big bang,. erm well how?

  • 1:20 I saw him in lots of documentaries, he's famous :p

    I wonder what its made of. I have aspergers just like Einstein so maybe I can figure it out. :)

    We dont really have to worry because we wont be here when most of the future will happen, but for some reason, its just fun. I'm one of those people who love discovering things, and other places and stuff. :D

  • @XSkullxTotenKopfX Maybe if we are still here its going slow enough for us to have time to adapt. I think.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more