this was the first final I ever saw and since Italy was not playing I really did not care who won but I must say it was an interesting final if nothing else.
See these pathetic English commentators. All the way they want argentina to loose the game.hahaha their wish is never gonna be fulfiled.They say it is the worst organized WC.They forget that 66WC is the worst one.The WC trophy was stolen and retrieved by a dog before WC started, what is more embarassing than that.English are bad loosers.
@lakshman4u perhaps but you are definitely a prick. The Argentines are the biggest cheats ever paying off Peru, their disgusting cheating at 1986, 1966,1998, 2002, 2006. I love it when they get knocked out, they always cause trouble.
@Noid111 hahaha u british shits are the WORST losers man, ok sure peru offered a price and argentina payed cuz peru knew if they moved on they would of gone no where, so argentina won ONE fixed game, great, what happened after? we payed everyone else off?? HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! PLEASE!!! WE KICKED ALL UR ERUO FUCKS OUT OF THE WORLD CUP!!! and in 86 ok maradona scored with his hand, big deal, that wasnt the winning goal, later on he took 5 players and made u british fucks eat his shit hahahahhahahaha
@hernanra021 to you and the other retard permit me to remind you of this. 1990 they disgraced themselves. 1986 they cheated. 1978 they paid off Peru. At the 78 world cup the dumb fucks were cheering on the junta's team while their kids were being thrown out of helicopters in the river plate. Did you honestly think we would abandon the Falkland Islanders to disgusting, greasy, inbred people like that? Never gonna happen.
@Noid111 England never won anything, the 1966 was the worst cup ever, england bought all the referees and cheat in every games, then in the final with germany, the ball never got throgh, Germany was so much better team that the mediocres players of england. They are and they always be a shity team, they will never win a World Cup outside england like Brasil, Argentina, Germany or italy
@lakshman4u they did not say it was badly organized, on the contrary they said it was well organized with the exeption of the delay at the start of the final.
@truvianni It was a very good WC as far as i can see it both i terms of football and organisation. A perfect final for two best teams at that time. Though we missed Cruyff, Argentina really deserved that WC. They played scintillating football throughout the tournament.
@lakshman4u I would not say they really deserved to win as I can also the Dutch as being deserved winners yet Argentina did have certain unfair advantages which today would not be permited.They got to play against Peru after Brazil had already played against Poland,knowing by how many goals they needed to win.Today both these games would have been played at the same time and I am not even talkiing about rumors of brivery against Peru which has never been proven yet never disproven either.
I remember this match well. A very difficult match to referee. I suppose the delayed start didn't help ther players. A lot of chances for both teams and the atmosphere was at boiling point before kick off. Difficult match for thr ref.
Rudi Krol, Holland captain should have refused to shake hands with Passarella after the dirty mind games he played against Van Der Kerkhof's hand plaster. Mind you, he had played with the same plaster in the last 5 games, and not a single team had objected to it. First Argentine team was late for 5 minutes, and then they began to bitch about a non-issue. That speaks volumes about their self-confidence in defeating Holland fair and square! Doesn't it ?!! Could they go any lower in fair play?!
What about the Argentinian defenders just jumping up and catching through balls and the referee doesn't even bother to give them a yellow card - Argentina had a good side in 1978 but in this game they played dirty when it suited them and also had a lot of luck - Holland deserved to win it.
I could'nt agree with you more. If only that last minute shot by Rensenbrink had touched the net, instead of hitting the post, Holland could have been deservedly become world champion. For me, they were the best team in 1974, and 1978 world cups.
@gabic83 : If you can read my comment in English, then you should respond in English!, as I don't know what you have written. How about me reading your comment in Spanish, or Italian (or whatever language you have used), and then respond you in Chinese or Japanese!
Sorry, man. I thought that the phrase LA TENÉS ADENTRO was known all over the world. Maradona invented it, It means YOU HAVE IT INSIDE. That´s all. Not big deal.
this was the first final I ever saw and since Italy was not playing I really did not care who won but I must say it was an interesting final if nothing else.
truvianni 2 months ago
este mundial fue una mafia organizada!!
ESPANTOSO "mundial"
AldoAlonso89 3 months ago
Bloody cheats, they are...
hanzzz2303 5 months ago
"DER KAFEE DER WELTMEISTERSCHAFT 1ST DER KAFFEE AUS BRASILIEN"...What is that?
gtbtlz 7 months ago
See these pathetic English commentators. All the way they want argentina to loose the game.hahaha their wish is never gonna be fulfiled.They say it is the worst organized WC.They forget that 66WC is the worst one.The WC trophy was stolen and retrieved by a dog before WC started, what is more embarassing than that.English are bad loosers.
lakshman4u 10 months ago
@lakshman4u perhaps but you are definitely a prick. The Argentines are the biggest cheats ever paying off Peru, their disgusting cheating at 1986, 1966,1998, 2002, 2006. I love it when they get knocked out, they always cause trouble.
Noid111 8 months ago
@Noid111 hahaha u british shits are the WORST losers man, ok sure peru offered a price and argentina payed cuz peru knew if they moved on they would of gone no where, so argentina won ONE fixed game, great, what happened after? we payed everyone else off?? HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! PLEASE!!! WE KICKED ALL UR ERUO FUCKS OUT OF THE WORLD CUP!!! and in 86 ok maradona scored with his hand, big deal, that wasnt the winning goal, later on he took 5 players and made u british fucks eat his shit hahahahhahahaha
ooohhhdddaaammm123 7 months ago
@Noid111 Egland always was a shity team, they only won a world cup once, in their home, and they cheat because the ball didn´t got through.
Argentina had 4 finals, and in 1986 they were by far the best team. England had a mediocre team in 1986, they only beated Paraguay.
hernanra021 7 months ago
@hernanra021 to you and the other retard permit me to remind you of this. 1990 they disgraced themselves. 1986 they cheated. 1978 they paid off Peru. At the 78 world cup the dumb fucks were cheering on the junta's team while their kids were being thrown out of helicopters in the river plate. Did you honestly think we would abandon the Falkland Islanders to disgusting, greasy, inbred people like that? Never gonna happen.
Noid111 7 months ago
@Noid111 England never won anything, the 1966 was the worst cup ever, england bought all the referees and cheat in every games, then in the final with germany, the ball never got throgh, Germany was so much better team that the mediocres players of england. They are and they always be a shity team, they will never win a World Cup outside england like Brasil, Argentina, Germany or italy
hernanra021 7 months ago
@lakshman4u they did not say it was badly organized, on the contrary they said it was well organized with the exeption of the delay at the start of the final.
truvianni 2 months ago
@truvianni It was a very good WC as far as i can see it both i terms of football and organisation. A perfect final for two best teams at that time. Though we missed Cruyff, Argentina really deserved that WC. They played scintillating football throughout the tournament.
lakshman4u 2 months ago
@lakshman4u I would not say they really deserved to win as I can also the Dutch as being deserved winners yet Argentina did have certain unfair advantages which today would not be permited.They got to play against Peru after Brazil had already played against Poland,knowing by how many goals they needed to win.Today both these games would have been played at the same time and I am not even talkiing about rumors of brivery against Peru which has never been proven yet never disproven either.
truvianni 2 months ago
I remember this match well. A very difficult match to referee. I suppose the delayed start didn't help ther players. A lot of chances for both teams and the atmosphere was at boiling point before kick off. Difficult match for thr ref.
MySilverr 1 year ago 5
It's so strange to see the defenders directly pass the ball back to their keeper, and the keeper pick the ball up. Crazy old-school.
paniconya5 1 year ago
Menotti is a jerk.
marcoklaue 1 year ago
Ruud Krol (5) was the player with the most beautiful legs of the decade.
discomania80 1 year ago
due grandi squadre! grande Argentina ma anche grande Olanda degli anni '70!
MircoMV 2 years ago
Digan lo que quieran, Argentina campeon del mundo.
Y que la sigan chupando!
drhoratio 2 years ago
the Dutch had a player called Van de Kerkhof "Son of a Graveyard" what a name !
dimgwalltameiben 2 years ago
Esa final la merecia holanda, lastima
aunk Argentina tambien tenia un ekipaso
ALEJANDRO8077 2 years ago
@ALEJANDRO8077 Vos decís que la merecía por lo hecho en ambos mundiales? (78 y 74) o por lo que mostró particularmente en la Argentina?
En todo caso habrá merecido más en el 74, sin Johan no era lo mismo... Estaba para cualquiera a decir verdad
maperaltabuelo 2 years ago
Oh...it's good hear Johan Cruyff commenting the game but I wish he were there...He would have lead Netherlands to win.
ecyclesports 2 years ago 9
Argentina didn´t deserved to win this world cup,like England in 1966,or Germany in 1954 etc...
brandaoz 2 years ago
Rudi Krol, Holland captain should have refused to shake hands with Passarella after the dirty mind games he played against Van Der Kerkhof's hand plaster. Mind you, he had played with the same plaster in the last 5 games, and not a single team had objected to it. First Argentine team was late for 5 minutes, and then they began to bitch about a non-issue. That speaks volumes about their self-confidence in defeating Holland fair and square! Doesn't it ?!! Could they go any lower in fair play?!
14mooler 2 years ago 3
What about the Argentinian defenders just jumping up and catching through balls and the referee doesn't even bother to give them a yellow card - Argentina had a good side in 1978 but in this game they played dirty when it suited them and also had a lot of luck - Holland deserved to win it.
Resenbrink 2 years ago 3
I could'nt agree with you more. If only that last minute shot by Rensenbrink had touched the net, instead of hitting the post, Holland could have been deservedly become world champion. For me, they were the best team in 1974, and 1978 world cups.
14mooler 2 years ago 2
'74 team was brillant - '78 team was beginning to show its age but was still great. 1998 World Cup team was bloody good as well.
Resenbrink 2 years ago 6
14mooler, la tenés adentro.
gabic83 1 year ago
@gabic83 : If you can read my comment in English, then you should respond in English!, as I don't know what you have written. How about me reading your comment in Spanish, or Italian (or whatever language you have used), and then respond you in Chinese or Japanese!
14mooler 1 year ago
Sorry, man. I thought that the phrase LA TENÉS ADENTRO was known all over the world. Maradona invented it, It means YOU HAVE IT INSIDE. That´s all. Not big deal.
gabic83 1 year ago
Gonella, one of the most pathetic displays by a referee in a final ever - complete twit.
Resenbrink 2 years ago 2