Tank Ballet at Russian Arms Expo 2010

[arafat88ryu]

Danceing tank, only in Russian Army

[hermisky]

毛子爱坦克，坦克爱毛子～

[nikolaq8]

требую музыку из лебединого озера! =)

[gentabiru]

i like all russian toys

[buhoi78]

@gentabiru ты наши комбайны не видел! )))))

[TheChidopuntocom]

the one of the beginning

[sambabayasin]

@TheChidopuntocom

check Wikipedia for Preobrazhensky Regiment

[TheChidopuntocom]

can someone give the exact name of the music? because i have already search in youtube and the music that apparead didn't sound exactly like this one.

[MrRusSerb]

Вот сразу видно по комментам, уровень воспитания наших граждан и иностранцев. Стыдно товарищи... а танкисты лучшие в мире, впрочем, как и их машины.

[Zamolxes77]

miss 120 mm will you give me this dance?

[romati27]

@Zamolxes77 125mm

[Gurjaaneli]

nothing to hard actually :) but a like the music! it is excellent!

[Mw3gameboi]

in america we ask girls out to the ballet.. in Russia they ask tanks out to the ballet

[2015meyer]

remember how russians are like masters at ballet, well they've outgrown people ballet, there is now a new level to it

[2015meyer]

@Mastermind19871987 so do i so i cant say anything lol

[liegus1]

WTF they are doing

[mostimbawarri]

@liegus1 drinking and driving xD

[BURNxxxTHExxxHERETIC]

In Russia ballet is done in tanks?

[JaimeWulf]

nicely done...

[qrety83]

молодцы,поржал) над было еще ручеек замутить,есть куда стремиться)

[kirgiz24651]

Как-то на репетиции у них веселей получалось, видать на выступлении не налили. ;)

[FuckMan010]

палец вверх если вы в в ютубе в поиске написали russia

[herykartedy]

mun bisa di kiridit sapoe sarebu meuli da.........

[LordOfHorroR1]

@Nomad539 Иди учиться мудак малолетний 

[Nomad539]

@LordOfHorroR1 пососи

[vudz2]

@Nomad539

чувствуется мощь интеллекта и опыт применения танков (:

[adrenalinRussia]

@Nomad539 ну ты сам быдло и видно что дух у тебя не русский,я сам армянин ивсегда был за русских и за Россию и буду.нужно своих потдерживать а не ху йню всякую нести дурак ты чукотский

[moek111]

how nice are they going to dance ous to death if they start a world war 3

[fracescovalente]

ja hochu vidjet T-101 <3

[TheArbiter138]

nothing like seeing a pair of t-72s just dancing like girls

[Swertzer]

@TheArbiter138

IT'S t90...

[TheArbiter138]

@Swertzer woops well its kinda dificult sometimes to tell the difference as t-90s pretty much a modernized T-72

[Swertzer]

@TheArbiter138

I Agree. :)

[TheArbiter138]

@Swertzer well im gonna try and get to tell the difference

[dizzygak]

@TheArbiter138 Believe me my friend - when you deal with tanks - it's not all about exterior design =)

[TheArbiter138]

@dizzygak good point oh you might not know this but does the t-90s 2a46 have better punch then the one on the previous tanks

[KritikPessimist]

@LWeRNeO От клоуна слышу. Ты знаешь, как это сложно - управлять танком? Да притом еще и синхронизировать несколько штук?

[SerbianCommandoSCGRS]

Whats the name of the melody?

[Swertzer]

@SerbianCommandoSCGRS

Prvi je "Preobrazenski mars",za drugu melodiju ne znam,neki ruski valcer...

[SerbianCommandoSCGRS]

@Swertzer Hvala puno bratac ;)

[KritikPessimist]

Что, американцы? Завидно, судя по вашим комментариям? Вам еще учится и учится у нас!

[LWeRNeO]

@KritikPessimist Учитса далбаебизму? Балет сука. Клоуны.

[jinlord666]

:O

[YANGEZE]

ガスタービン？

[CyberAtlant]

Молодцы! :-) Сидел в танке, водил, знаю, как это все сложно. Поэтому молодцы ребята, водители танков!!!

[SidedriverDotCom]

They need SideDriver tracks. SideDriver. Drive allways.

[TheOnpunk]

Помирать, так с музыкой

[Wyraxx]

in Soviet Russia ballet tanks you! )))

[forgemaster12]

This is the real russian ballet

[mark12130]

did you know the t90 tanks could reach up to 35 miles but the m1 abrahms could reach up to 48 miles and did you know that the t90 tank is 65 tons of armor but the abrahms is 56 tons and the abrahms could fire up to 1.8 miles and the t90 only could reach up to a mile read the facts of how good the abrahms tank is

[maurice1325]

@mark12130 all your facts are wrong... the Abrams is a laugh. it costs a few million dollars more than the T-90, weights about 15-20 tons more than the T-90, making it less manueverable. Also, the T90 can fire accurate up to 8000M, Abrams only around 5000M. The T-90 sometimes has ERA protection, making it even more stronger. Also the T90 can drive underwater.. while the abrams is vulnerable for water and gets rust very quickly en costing 100 thousands of dollars every year for repairs?

[mark12130]

@maurice1325 ha your facts are wrong.... well we have this artillery bomb that could shoots tanks up to 45 miles away and you russians havent even ivented it yet

[maurice1325]

@mark12130 First: I'm not russian, i just admire their weapons.

Also, i would like to know where you get your facts from.

and third, whats the name of this artillery bomb? And it's obvious

you don't know much about military vehicles, because 45 miles is nothing

for rocket artillery. "Russians havent even invented it yet" is very funny, because

these kind of weapons were made in the cold war and even then they could fire up (far) more than 45 miles... also, Russia has 16.000 more artillery..

[mark12130]

@maurice1325 did you know russia is cut into 3 pieces ever since russia invaded georgia and that means russia is double times less powerful with there budgets crisis they will always be weak becuase of that read the facts the united states army is the most strongest army in the world the name of the artillery is the f235 shell bomber and your facts are wrong and russia well never be strong again becuase of that incadent 3 years ago

[maurice1325]

@mark12130 I wasn't saying that Russia is stonger than the U.S, but that the T-90 is better that the Abrams..

and that 45 miles shooting artillery isn't impressive. Also, just saying your "facts are wrong" doesn't say much, so which of my facts is wrong? and the f235 shell bomber doesn't exist..?! I can't find any reference about it...so tell me, where can i find info about it..

[maurice1325]

also, only the fact that you said that the that the T-90 can only reach up to a mile says enough.. I don't know were your get your information from, comic books maybe? because 1 mile is nothing for a tank.. every modern tank can reach 1 louzy mile.. and that the T-90 can reach up to 35 miles is totally crazy.. that means that the tank is out of fuel in 1 hour? Do you really think that? they can reach around 400 miles.. not 35

[maxvgs]

@mark12130 флаг америкосам.они герои весь мир заебали уже

[franknbeans4761]

@maurice1325 The T-90 always has ERA protection, it is a key part of it's armor package and actually relies on it. Because it is so key, it could be a weakness. A small anti-tank weapon could take out the ERA and pave the way for a much larger round to blow through it. Or just use a tandem head warhead like the current TOW missile or Javelin missile. Both of which being built in large numbers.

[maurice1325]

@franknbeans4761 ERA cannot be taken out by an small anti-tank weapon, it's too strong. even most KE ammunition can't penetrate it, (tandem) HEAT, and RPG-7's cannot either, while the Abrams is vulnerable against the RPG-7's. and all regular used amunition (120mm etc) is been tested, by several parties, and it sustained those ammunition. Offcourse it isn't 100% and it can't sustain everything.. but that's only logical.. nothing can. It's a shame the russians don't use their better newer ERA..

[franknbeans4761]

@maurice1325 Not penetrate it, but expend it. The Abrams can (and has) been hit with RPG's and continued fighting with minimal armor damage. If a weapon like an AT-4 hit the Kontakt 5 armor it wouldn't penetrate it but expend it and make that tank vulnerable in that area due to a simple anti tank weapon.

As for the better ERA the "Relikt" it isn't in use for the same reason Nakidma isn't in use. They don't want other countries to get it and build something to defeat it or copy it.

[maurice1325]

@franknbeans4761 Kontakt 5 has to be shot at least twice before it's "broken". and all those small anti-tank weapons wouldn't do much, because they would only shoot 1 ERA block, leaving the rest unharmed, and for the

AT-4, it would have a good impact, but still wouldn't do much damage. For RPG's, a T-90 been hit by 7 RPG-7's, and it still went going. And don't forget the standard armor and Shtora system. the Abrams can't beat the T-90.,

the T-90 still has better range, manuverability etc.

[franknbeans4761]

@maurice1325 In terms of fighting in an actual battle, the Abrams is more durable. Although it may take 2 times before Kontakt 5 is used up, it still gets used up faster than the Abrams armor. As for the Abrams, it has been hit by many different types of tanks rounds and kept going.

Shtora is very limited. It only stops a certain generation of missiles. The Javelin can still beat it and so can the TOW, due to the fact that you can manually guide the TOW. As for tanks, Shtora wouldn't .......

[franknbeans4761]

@maurice1325 do much against them, because the tank could already lock on to the tank and fire an APFSDS (the M829A2 or A3 which can break through Kontakt 5) before Shtora might be able to swing it's turret toward it and stop it.

And if you look at the armament of it, the T-90 almost never carries ATGMs due to how expensive they are compared to regular rounds. It's obvious that most engagements take place at 1,500 meters or less so what is the point in having and expensive missile.

[maurice1325]

@franknbeans4761 Thats right, those can have effect on the ERA, but they aren't a "one shot one kill".

And in times of war they would carry ATGM's i think. It's a shame the US got an T-72 with ERA (on a sad way, they bought it without telling who they wheir and offered 5 times more than that it was worth.), now they know about it and they have made antiweapons for it, and they are even coping it. It's also a shame we don't know more about Relikt.

[maurice1325]

@franknbeans4761 the T-90 also is more durable. The Abrams is very fragile from inside, and many parts have to be repaired and replaced every year. It's also rust sensitive... while the T-90 can drive underwater.

[franknbeans4761]

@maurice1325 Do you have proof of it being more sensitive?

I know the ERA would not be a one shot one kill situation. But if it is part of the main armor, then a lot of different weapons can take out the ERA itself, leaving the tank very exposed. A quality that the Abrams does not have.

As for the ATGM, what is the point of carrying them if they are expensive and will almost never be used at the appropriate range? It is nice to have but in combat situations is limiting. Kind of like why.....

[franknbeans4761]

@maurice1325 ...the M60A2 did no remain in service. Or the M551 Sheridan. Both concepts from the 1970's.

As for the tests on Kontakt-5, it was a joint American-German venture.

I know Relikt has the ERA plates blast out to the sides so that the APFSDS round twists to the side when it hits the armor, losing all it's kinetic energy and not destroying the tank. This is to defeat the M829A2 and A3 weapons, not for more advanced ATGMs. It is tough to say if Relikt is that good due to the fact.....

[franknbeans4761]

@maurice1325 ....that America used DU rounds, which have self-sharpening abilities. This means that when it hits a target it doesn't dull down but instead burns through the penetrating rod until nothing is left or the tank is destroyed. I am not sure if Relikt would be able to counter the kinetic energy of a APFSDS round but I am not one to say.

[maurice1325]

@franknbeans4761 Yes i have proof about that, but in dutch. And what I was talking about it was a American-British venture, Britain bought two T-72's from Russia for double the price, Russia agreed, not knowing who bought, and then Britain and the US both had one for testing. The abrams proved well protected in the frontside, but is vulnerable from the sides and is there were several Abrams destroyed because of small antitankweapons hits from the side and behind during Iraq wars in 2003.

[maurice1325]

@franknbeans4761 So the ERA may be vulnerable for (some) antitankweapons, but the Abrams, has it's weaknesses too. "Nog begrotelijker was het dat de metalen behuizing van de peperdure keramische pantsermodules erg roestgevoelig bleek zodat voor iedere tank honderdduizenden dollars per jaar moesten worden uitgegeven aan vervanging" = source about rusting. quick translation: the metal housing of the very expensive ceramic pantser modules where very rust sensitive so for every tank their had to be

[maurice1325]

@franknbeans4761 repaired every year for hundred thousands dollars.

[franknbeans4761]

@maurice1325 Yes, do not get me wrong, the Abrams does have it's vulnerable points in the rear, and back sides of the vehicle. I was mainly pointing out that the T-90 relies heavily on ERA for protection and this is good to a certain extent.

[franknbeans4761]

@maurice1325 And you say that the Abrams is a laugh? What? And the Abrams gets rusty very quickly? mark12130 did not have accurate sources but I don't think you did either.

And you say the T-90 can fire up to 8000 meters, but this is only with ATGMs. And even then, they do not regularly carry them due to their high cost and the fact that most tank engagements occur within 1500 meters. As for protection the Abrams beats the T-90. As for crew training, the Abrams almost always beats the T-90 too.

[VonBismarkOtto]

@franknbeans4761

Not clear.

Crew training it is a tank's quality? :)

Try to compare not armies but vehicles

[franknbeans4761]

@VonBismarkOtto I was mainly talking about the ATGM aspect of it, but looking at crew training is something that must be considered. It is not what a vehicle can and can't do, but what you can and can't do with what it has.

[Aaidas2]

@mark12130 You must be fucking stupid. You pulled out those facts out your ass?

[mark12130]

@Aaidas2 what that russia fell in 3 pieces and now is weak that is a true fact

[maurice1325]

@mark12130 no it isn't.. along with all your other weird facts about tanks... please learn a bit more about tanks, before you post weird untrue stuff on the internet.

[LEOOPOA]

47 americans justin biebher fans, don't like te T90 an your maneuverability..fucking idiot's this is hte porpouse of de waltz show how it is easy controled....american's great head and small brain like hommer simpson.

[BFM74]

всем спасибо

[ARTURizTAGANA]

Russian tanks are the best, WW2 proved it ... and Syrian T72 dealt well with these Merkava ... well exploded in their vaunted Merkava from getting RPG29

[captmatt47]

All tankers, regardless of nationality, have a great sense of humor!

[kaplich]

Cool video! Russians are definitely good in classic ballet and tanks! now we can watch the mix of these things :))

[QuintiMa]

i laughed my head off XD

[koolguy412]

GOOD TANK DRIVING!! FUCK THE HATERS!!!

[MKdubstep]

47 people are fans of abrams tank :-D

[kanazef]

RUSSIAAN STROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG.­.

FROM: INDONESIAN..

[TheMspacmann]

let me be the mature one, SHUT THE FUCK UP!

[Alkanvaar]

I trolled that.

[headforshead36]

VICTOR REZNOV: MOTHER RUSSIA! 

[Eagle1oh7]

An aerial ballet is better! Boo! Get off the stage black swan!

[AugsterA]

OMG, that Music combined with their Drunk Tank Operators! Damn, Where's my Ear plugs!

[seniorortega]

In America balerina weights 86lb, In Russia balerina weighs 68 tonnes and runs on Vodka.

[reptilionsarehere]

@seniorortega In America a ballerina weighs 40lb and runs on no food and common interests are forcibly making themselves throw up.

[cardude1992]

wow the t-90 is so talented. it knows how to kill and to dance lol

[Gaiver20007]

какую только хуйню не придумают(((

[Bonygasse]

traktoristen...*spuck*

[Spiel1923]

esto es ofensivo...los tanques las armas de rommel y guderian....estos 2 se estan retozando en sus tumbas....no se occidentalizes camaradas rusos!!!

LOS TANQUES SON PARA LA GUERRA !!!!!!

[dimonFromSpb]

no one can defeat us, because a tank can crush the whole of Germany, and three tanks fuck America )))))

[NHCPmn]

@dimonFromSpb you seem to forget the gulf war when about 300 american tanks and a-10s absolutely slaughtered thousands of your t-72's im sure there isnt much improvement from 72-90 >.>

[Zukhov1945]

@NHCPmn There's a lot of improvement. Iraqi T-72 can't really be compared with a modernized russian T-72 lead by a decent crew. And a T-72 is not really supposed to fight the moder M1, the T-90 is.

[NosferatuAaacaado]

@NHCPmn leave a-10s out of the equation and see how your brave tankers would roll.

[dimonFromSpb]

@NHCPmn Do not take all this seriously, my komenntary was written in the style of Russian humor, it's just a joke brother)))

[ARMANDOSICARIUS]

Барышников был бы горд

[gmoore9449]

Ah, yes. The Smolensk Townswomen's Guild reenacts the Battle of Kursk.

[xPendek]

Go China!

[Gregorianec333]

@xPendek May be go to USA ?))

[huevparolbla]

какие наперстки вы чё гоните. вы там все уже распродали мозги набекрень-дебилы!

[alexander1t]

russians, what they'll think next? submarine ballet?

[Gregorianec333]

@alexander1t no, i think  aircraft carrier opera with air elements

[AWtify]

@alexander1t Ballistic Missile Ballet

[ZeroZerich]

@alexander1t Why not? =)

[mshigorin]

@alexander1t already done: watch?v=8sh7-9vNWBk and en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Operation_Behemoth#Be­hemoth-2 (tight course dance with sixteen nuclear sabres)

[mshigorin]

@alexander1t already done: watch?v=8sh7-9vNWBk and en.wikipedia . org/wiki/Operation_Behemoth#Be­hemoth-2 (tight course dance with sixteen nuclear sabres)

[thecris0620]

So Funny ^^¡

[Kotek511]

new world competition : TANK DANCING!!!

Great:D

best wishes for these tank teams:)

[DonLollio]

at 3:36 how the fuck did that tank sneak up behind lol!......or was it just hiding?

[JammyD2579]

How can you dislike this? It's fucking hilarious.

[slimj82]

This vid reminds me of people trying to parallel park.

[declaration963]

Abram can't dance, Abram can't fueled by Vodka, and Abram was driven by Crazy American, that's for sure...

so ? no more compare USA vs Russia....

[105thch]

Oh lol... All americans comments is only about:

-vodka

-crazy russies

-Abrams - better

Fuck it makes americans so stupid. Keep going idiots.

[joshuastark86]

@105thch LOL all russian comments is only written with fake letters.

[MaJIbIu]

@105thch stupid retard, it shows how well these machines and are easily controlled

[19102101830]

Preobrazensky MARCH! :D

My favorite!

[LEECHESANDCREAM]

The grace and elegance of it all especially the one in front...

[awsit1]

Wow, so elegant...NOT!!!

[DonLollio]

@awsit1 yer mom

[Berkutinator]

Oh them crazy Russians.

[eloctaro]

Dancing is better than war

[soimeffinnuts]

@ Dom10908060 ....You really have no idea do you?

[thatoneirishkoreaguy]

ughhh....yeah I got here from looking at wombats....how do these two relate?!?!

[soimeffinnuts]

T90...what a piece of crap!! Show me some M1A1 ballets!

[zagreus101]

@soimeffinnuts they're all too busy doing nothing in iraq.

Now a Churchill tank, they could turn on a 20p piece. Also, they're all decommissioned so its fine and not dick waggling with your latest hardware.

[Dom10908060]

@soimeffinnuts

M1A1 is a real quintessence of crap! )

[SecuR0M]

@Dom10908060 T-90 is a T-72 with watered down T-80U electronics.

It is inferior to the T-80U, which is inferior to the M1A2.

sucks dunnit

[Nazrul117]

Who knows tank can be that gentle..

[wepajnc]

vodka rules!

[wepajnc]

only in russia!!

[st1gma88]

wow lots of people hating. Just stop it.. I think this is bad ass, moving these machines that weight TONS is not an easy task. This is just awesome, shows some really good skills for the tank's crew members. I'm American btw, and I have to admit that this is just awesome.

[Cnupoc]

i love how in the middle of all this ballet there are some heavy ass equipment passing infront :D :D :D :D just awesome !

[tartuga2009]

Geil !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[stapletack]

You'd think the Russians would be better at a tank ballet, but actually no, because their Russian, yet yes, because it involves tanks.

[kubaistube]

LOOOOOOL

[kubaistube]

LOOOOOOR

[Osswald89]

Meanwhile in Russia... xD

[FlashRoyalFull]

All who repeats here about vodka - the numskulls who are not seeing further the nose. These are very difficult maneuvers in which synchronous work of tipper-ofs of all tanks and drivers is required. And the platform is intended for display only one unit of technics. I understand russian, on it and I speak.

[Tihamah3]

gay

[Trinieffects]

In soviet russia tanks fire at you,

in Iraq you fire at tanks

[CsDeathshadow]

russians are crazy in the coconut xD

[hiruniuthpala]

A Cute, latin Girls for you busizz4me.info

[Toomuchfa]

Meanwhile in russia

[ArmASoldier2006]

In Soviet Russia tanks dance you.

[RomanicusMaximus]

Vodka!

[kudrshow]

3:23 FIRE!!!!!!!!!!



[suhail3920]

Well, if Fantasia could make hippos dance, why not this?.....

[SuperQuagmire69]

only russia could make a tank look gay.

[HelloMottoTaiKamu93]

oh russia is known for it's cold weather,beautiful churchs oww and dancing tanks

[nicktk]

nice...lol

[GloryThyName]

7:30 of my life watsed then another 60secs wasted scanning through the huge bitch fight in the comments thread about "Russia vs America" while moralfags try and bash everyone up for hatin on each other. Absolute sosuage fest, enjoy your AIDS.

[skvakagud]

@GloryThyName ROFL you just made the last 2 boring videos i watched to get here, worth it.. :D

[De4dm4u5Rulez]

Only Russia can make ballet seem so fucking EPIC.

[kibabiba]

@jasper5554 Downgraded iraq made copies of T-72

[Ralfiukas]

In soviet russia tanks dance ballet