I have a question about CATIA V5 surfacing vs. PRO/Surface which is the basic surfacing tools that come with PRO/Engineer.
I have found that surfaces defined with 3 datum curves in PRO/Engineer are hard to work with because the meshing seems to become "degenerate" as it converges on the point or corner of the surface patch. For whatever reason the PRO/E internal surface representation seems to want quad-patch surfaces.
Does CATIA do 3-curve surfaces flawlessly, or workarounds needed?
I have a question about CATIA V5 surfacing vs. PRO/Surface which is the basic surfacing tools that come with PRO/Engineer.
I have found that surfaces defined with 3 datum curves in PRO/Engineer are hard to work with because the meshing seems to become "degenerate" as it converges on the point or corner of the surface patch. For whatever reason the PRO/E internal surface representation seems to want quad-patch surfaces.
Does CATIA do 3-curve surfaces flawlessly, or workarounds needed?
nightowl8936 5 months ago
nice voice.. love the operator..
MrMuthafuka11 11 months ago
THANKSSSS
prince2princess7 1 year ago