An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
a black hole isnt literally a hole. its a sphere. its just a condenced star and its gravity is so strong that light cannot escape, therefore cant be seen. things do not fall into it, they are just infinitely condenced
There are no blackholes guys, it was just a theory or a concept. No one ever really discovered and studied blackholes in real life. Just imagine that not even light can escape. We have died long ago perhaps billions of years. Such non-sense guys. The only thing that the so called blackholes exist is because of the funds that the Government provides. The best example of this is the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
It wouldn't actually look like this if observed from afar. Objects on a radial (non-rotating) trajectory would in fact appear to slow down and get fainter as they approach the event horizon, not speed up.
the most unrealistic horribly accurate black hole simulation you should study more do you even know how a star becomes a black hole all 14 steps in which take billions of years
This is horribly inaccurate... Matter doesn't just fall in.. as a few people have pointed out... it spins... at near-light speed close to the event horizon. That's why the area around a black hole emits light... this 'black hole' would be completely invisible.
@VahnsGrl244 Actually, it would spin if it had angular momentum, which in this case, all this matter does not. This is accurate in describing the motion of matter falling directly in.
@danielodors If the initial velocity of the object is zero, how did it get there? :P It's very unlikely that the object was previously traveling head on towards the black hole and even if this was the case, odds are it would get bumped by the millions of other particles/stars/etc that are already revolving around it
@VahnsGrl244 - It is a simple yes or no question. I did not ask for what the odds of this idealized circumstance are, or weather a circumstance like this could even exist. Does it not fall straight in if the black hole does not rotate, and the initial velocity of the object is zero (and particles being as distant to each other as they are in the video without affecting each other through gravity)?
@danielodors Haha... ok, if you're going to be like that about it, my answer is still no. There are way too many things wrong with this video, and it doesn't seem to work in /any/ circumstance. Like I said, if the initial velocity of the object is zero, it would never get there. Supposing it was headed straight for it, an observer would never see the particle fall in. It would appear to slow down infinitely and never quite reach the event horizon....
@Dreadnought942 They are only invisible if no matter is being pulled in. I said the area /around/ a black hole is visible because of the matter. The definition of a black hole feeding is ... matter falling in. It clearly is feeding here... that's what all the white dots falling in are supposed to represent. This video is NOT accurate.
@4565645645 Yes, I am aware of that. But a diagram is no good if it's WRONG. An example is no good if it's unrealistic. Diagrams are supposed to be simpler versions of the real thing, but there really is no good way to "simplify" the events around a black hole, and /that/ particular "diagram" is one of the worse ones.
@VahnsGrl244 no. while what you've said is true, this could just be a schwarzschild black hole, in which case, the black hole wouldn't rotate; so neither would infalling matter.
@VahnsGrl244 A black hole by itself IS completely invisible (there is no light coming from past the event horizon because the escape velocity of a black hole is higher than the speed of light.) The only thing you could actually see is the distraction of the light caused by the black holes gravitation.
@Metalbirne Yes it is completely invisible, contrary to this simulation. But if the black hole was 'feeding', as it is here, it would have a swirling disk of matter around it that was heated to incandescence and would be visible. Who ever went through the trouble of making this could've taken an extra 10 minutes and made it more accurate ;)
perhaps all that happens in a black hole is that everything sucked in is squeezed smaller and smaller infinitely by a massive gravitational force.... makes more sense then most of these theories.
@staticon1976, the simulation was totally unrealistic because the gravitational attraction between the stuff falling into the black hole was missing. Those masses would attract each other in a real universe and in doing so they would impart some angular momentum on the stuff falling into the black hole.
@elojorojo well, its theorized by stephen hawking that black holes emit the matter they consume in gamma waves, which is turning mass into energy. Eventually, the black hole will explode in a gamma wave burst, and this process lasts many billions of trillions of years... This is just a theory though
Thats what happened to me last night!
HenrytheBrit 1 month ago
Try to make it rotation!!
TeslaCoil20kV 2 months ago
Did anyone else click the snowflake? Cool!
gredangeo 2 months ago
asshole
tunisiangeek 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
peopledick 3 months ago
there is no rotation
bahdah1234 3 months ago
a black hole isnt literally a hole. its a sphere. its just a condenced star and its gravity is so strong that light cannot escape, therefore cant be seen. things do not fall into it, they are just infinitely condenced
flcl64 3 months ago
There are no blackholes guys, it was just a theory or a concept. No one ever really discovered and studied blackholes in real life. Just imagine that not even light can escape. We have died long ago perhaps billions of years. Such non-sense guys. The only thing that the so called blackholes exist is because of the funds that the Government provides. The best example of this is the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
pogpog28 4 months ago
@pogpog28 you sir have no idea what Hawking Radiation is do you? Look it up and educate yourself before you go around spouting nonsense.
Mxttym4yh3m 3 months ago
What happens when the irresistible force meets the immovable object?
pogpog28 5 months ago
Thats a " red" hole llol
INMATE2468 6 months ago
more like toilet hole simulation.
seva809 6 months ago
grativy
TheAmazingLarryKoopa 6 months ago
It wouldn't actually look like this if observed from afar. Objects on a radial (non-rotating) trajectory would in fact appear to slow down and get fainter as they approach the event horizon, not speed up.
inquisitus 7 months ago
Dumb.
tnuh55 7 months ago
You fail,this is a red Hole NOOBS XD
degurkin 9 months ago
dont look like black hole + grav
RAHMELBASS 9 months ago
this just look like my kitchen sink
williamc313 9 months ago
thumbs up if you wonder what it would be like if sound was in there?
ONEshotRAIN 1 year ago
Shouldn't the stuff, you know, stretch?
SomeNightElf 1 year ago
@SomeNightElf - No, because he is using dimensionless particles.
danielodors 10 months ago
the most unrealistic horribly accurate black hole simulation you should study more do you even know how a star becomes a black hole all 14 steps in which take billions of years
xXZKULLXx 1 year ago
give me some brown holes.
virtuous8 1 year ago
This is horribly inaccurate... Matter doesn't just fall in.. as a few people have pointed out... it spins... at near-light speed close to the event horizon. That's why the area around a black hole emits light... this 'black hole' would be completely invisible.
VahnsGrl244 1 year ago 32
@VahnsGrl244 Actually, it would spin if it had angular momentum, which in this case, all this matter does not. This is accurate in describing the motion of matter falling directly in.
GaseousAnomaly001 1 year ago
@VahnsGrl244 inaccurate yes but a good simulation from a technical stand point
duchashes 1 year ago
@VahnsGrl244 - Does it not fall straight in if the black hole does not rotate, and the initial velocity of the object is zero?
danielodors 10 months ago
@danielodors If the initial velocity of the object is zero, how did it get there? :P It's very unlikely that the object was previously traveling head on towards the black hole and even if this was the case, odds are it would get bumped by the millions of other particles/stars/etc that are already revolving around it
VahnsGrl244 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VahnsGrl244 - It is a simple yes or no question. I did not ask for what the odds of this idealized circumstance are, or weather a circumstance like this could even exist. Does it not fall straight in if the black hole does not rotate, and the initial velocity of the object is zero (and particles being as distant to each other as they are in the video without affecting each other through gravity)?
danielodors 10 months ago
@danielodors Haha... ok, if you're going to be like that about it, my answer is still no. There are way too many things wrong with this video, and it doesn't seem to work in /any/ circumstance. Like I said, if the initial velocity of the object is zero, it would never get there. Supposing it was headed straight for it, an observer would never see the particle fall in. It would appear to slow down infinitely and never quite reach the event horizon....
VahnsGrl244 5 months ago
@VahnsGrl244 technically they are invisible no light escapes them
matter only spins around the event horizon when the black hole is feeding.
assuming it doesnt here.
this video is quite accurate
Dreadnought942 9 months ago
@Dreadnought942 They are only invisible if no matter is being pulled in. I said the area /around/ a black hole is visible because of the matter. The definition of a black hole feeding is ... matter falling in. It clearly is feeding here... that's what all the white dots falling in are supposed to represent. This video is NOT accurate.
VahnsGrl244 9 months ago
@VahnsGrl244 it is just a diagram, is an example only
4565645645 5 months ago
@4565645645 Yes, I am aware of that. But a diagram is no good if it's WRONG. An example is no good if it's unrealistic. Diagrams are supposed to be simpler versions of the real thing, but there really is no good way to "simplify" the events around a black hole, and /that/ particular "diagram" is one of the worse ones.
VahnsGrl244 5 months ago
@VahnsGrl244 no. while what you've said is true, this could just be a schwarzschild black hole, in which case, the black hole wouldn't rotate; so neither would infalling matter.
tijuanamarisol666 5 months ago
@tijuanamarisol666 It would if it wasn't aimed straight at the black hole... that's just basic gravitation...
VahnsGrl244 5 months ago
@VahnsGrl244 A black hole by itself IS completely invisible (there is no light coming from past the event horizon because the escape velocity of a black hole is higher than the speed of light.) The only thing you could actually see is the distraction of the light caused by the black holes gravitation.
feel free to correct me.
Metalbirne 2 months ago
@Metalbirne Yes it is completely invisible, contrary to this simulation. But if the black hole was 'feeding', as it is here, it would have a swirling disk of matter around it that was heated to incandescence and would be visible. Who ever went through the trouble of making this could've taken an extra 10 minutes and made it more accurate ;)
VahnsGrl244 2 months ago
perhaps all that happens in a black hole is that everything sucked in is squeezed smaller and smaller infinitely by a massive gravitational force.... makes more sense then most of these theories.
slightofhand666 2 years ago
that's what I'm thinking
woodster2k1 2 years ago
it wouldn't be infinitely because there is a finite amount of mass in it
TheWalrus19 2 years ago
Mass should spin, not fall into it, most of the mass spin next to it for a long long time.
GothicXII 2 years ago
unrealistic because the initial velocity and direction of every object in your universe is zero.
ananiasacts 2 years ago 46
@ananiasacts
False the univer is in expantion and he get faster every time
kdocss 1 year ago
@ananiasacts umm huh?
staticon1976 4 months ago
@staticon1976, the simulation was totally unrealistic because the gravitational attraction between the stuff falling into the black hole was missing. Those masses would attract each other in a real universe and in doing so they would impart some angular momentum on the stuff falling into the black hole.
ananiasacts 4 months ago
Where does it all go? eventually a Black hole just seizes to exist...but did it spill into another dimension?
elojorojo 2 years ago
@elojorojo well, its theorized by stephen hawking that black holes emit the matter they consume in gamma waves, which is turning mass into energy. Eventually, the black hole will explode in a gamma wave burst, and this process lasts many billions of trillions of years... This is just a theory though
raneFire 2 years ago
Cool!!!
mariobaccio 2 years ago
its like an an- no, i cant say it, its too rude
LoneEagle6348 2 years ago
nothing like it.
Bloodscalpr 2 years ago
lol pritty cool
PkDramatic 2 years ago