"Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think it's safe to assume that 95% of Blacks in that city are either semi-criminal or entirely criminal." was the newsletter quote. Any jackass can tell the author was using sarcasm.
- I'm not offended. I'm glad anytime Ron Paul's name is mentioned. Smart folks know that Ron Paul is far from being a racist even though he isn't very pleased with the job our half black/half white President, Barack Obama has done while he's been in office.
So now obama wants to clog up with chinese and brzilians Disney facilitating the inssuance of visas for China and Brzil in order to increate more TEMPORARY WORKS until the election.....and it intents to bill over 4 years in presidency! Did it work? This can be dangerous to USA because the visas will be less judgmental....
^Hey guys ! WE have a REAL PROBLEM ! CULTURAL FASCIST CONGRESS ! GEMA :EMI;SONY WARNER ( Thats right the Germans ! Music is a freedom that should be shared and enjoyed by all the people of the planet ! God damnit Ten Years -PUBLIC DOMAIN ! Fuck these culure fasciast lawyers ,you tube, google.time warner, sony ,emi Gema etc. making money of of shit they never heard or enjoy ! So FUCK THEM ALL !! FUCK SOPA ! The Freedom of speech -ain't that a song ! YOU FUCKIN LAWYERS !! they can keep GAGA !
I love America! The Americans drove The British, defeated the Germans and faced the Russians, all with much blood, sweat and tears...... But I have the impression tha, as the Romans did not resis the Barbarian invasion, The United States sucumbed to the african invasion, see: michaels jordan/jackson obahma and more....
I love America! The Americans drove The British, defeated the Germans and faced the Russians, and all with much blood, sweat and tears.... But i have the imprression tha, as the Romans did not resist the invasion of the Barbarian, The United States sucumbed to the african invasion, see: michael jordan/jackson/obhrama and more.
I was going to make a comment here,but I am pressed for time as I need to get my newsletter finished first. I hope you antenna is not one of those that's embedded in the margins of the windshield...lol
Funny skit, but when you consider the real and immediate problem of over-incarceration versus some articles of questionable taste printed two decades ago, I think it becomes clear that maybe the newsletter thing is a big deal over nothing.
Liberatarian to Texan ,and Arizonian to Republican ? Flip -flop ! What about his lawyer son ? Texas to Kentucky ? ARE YOU people intelligence ? Oh, yeah ,Oh Yeah .They all suck a BIG ONE ! Thanks guys . Kusinich ,that''s my guy !
This actually explains why Ron Paul believes big govt can't work. If he screwed up so bad running a little old newsletter, of COURSE he doesn't believe anyone can be successful with a Fed Govt organizing hundreds of millions of people.
Firstly, admitting you hire ghost writers is already damaging for such an "honest" guy. "you don't have time for what you hired them for" 8-12 pages a month? What the fuck was he doing? And he's still fully responsible.
"he's never spoken like the language in those particular letters" Fucking fool, that doesn't matter.
"He fired the person upon discovery" No proof of this has ever come up.
Blah. You guys are funnier than this. I liked the Jack Lalane comment on your previous one, but it seems like your beating a dead horse on this one. If your trying to give the RP supporters a laugh, I think you are missing it. Half of them are so fanatical they will disavow family for the guy, so getting subscribers on Youtube by bashing him won't do much, but the trolls will be chuckling. ;-) To all the Ron Paul haters, your liberal asses are on a sinking ship.
Ron Paul won't share a bathroom with a homosexual. Also, Red State Update doesn't like Ron Paul. It's humor, yes, but they also don't like him. So, all you people with plushie Ron Paul penises in your mouth, if you have any intelligence, downvote this video. I'm upvoting it, but I don't like the racist, senile loon.
@ClearPee No he didn't make million of dollars off of the newsletters. They barely broke even with cost and then after so long they started losing, so they stopped printing them.
It's OK, Jackie... it was WAY back in the day.... the Nineties. As a liberal American man, I forgive you. I believe in redemption. And fuck the minorities who don't.
@RoachBoySD How do you know James Powell' isn't a pseudonym for Ron Paul? Claiming it's a different writing style means absolutely nothing. Any professional writer will tell you they write in the style, tone, and voice best suited to reach the targeted audience.
The fact is, Dr. Pol was the PUBLISHER of those newsletters. Several close family members were involved in their production, and profited to the tune of MILLIONS of dollars from the newsletters. Why are you defending that?
@PostSurgeOperative Source?Proof? Also he wrote several pages and there were a few paragraphs that he didn't read and he doesn't publish them on his own..
@ClearPee Sitting there asking for evidence, when the evidence is right there and is all over the place, makes you look very insincere in your demands for more evidence. Oh, and that doesn’t make the avalanche of evidence go away either.
mrdestructo. com/2011/12/game-over-scans-of-over-50-ron-paul. html
criticalreactor. com/ronpaul/newsletters/1996_Dallas_Morning_News. html
@PostSurgeOperative The editor is responsible for content, not the publisher. Saying tht people who were associated with him are racist and therefore he is racist, is like saying those politicians who accept money from the drug companies are pharmacists. And Ron Paul hasn't taken corporate money becasue it isn't offered to him because he can't be bought
@shizont WRONG, Paulunteer! The publisher is ultimately responsible for what is published. It's like the difference between a movie's producer, and the guy who wrote the screenplay.
@PostSurgeOperative ed•i•tor noun 1. a person having managerial and sometimes policy-making responsibility for the editorial part of a publishing firm or of a newspaper, magazine, or other publication. publisher noun 1. a person or company whose business is the publishing of books, periodicals, engravings, computer software, etc. 2. the business head of a newspaper organization or publishing house, commonly the owner or the representative of the owner.
@cheeseaura Nope, it is so, he directed content according to all accounts.
"hired a ghost writer" How dishonest! He is truly is a lying bastard!
"to check a very old newsletter" Damn you're fucking stupid; it was being published 1978-1996 under his name, went out every month, and was only 8-12 pages; there's simply no excuse.
Nope, Paul himself is quoted in that article; he admitted he did that interview in 2001 although he "admits" he lied, but its obvious he's lying about lying.
@cheeseaura Yes they are; we know he was heavily involved in the processing of editing and promoting them; there's no excuse for him not knowing content. Even then, why would something with 1) Your signature 2) Your name on it, and 3) Claims to represent your views--which is all by your direct order--be something that you didn't even notice until more than 20 years of them being published? That's laughable.
Also, he admitted authorship back in 1996, quoting the articles themselves.
Even if Dr. Paul personally wrote every word of the newsletter, which he didn't, or supported every word of it, which he didn't, this is still peanuts compared to the insane babble and unethical behavior of the other Republican candidates. The media, and apparently independent, amateur comedy writers, want SO badly to undermine Dr. Paul's appeal and this is newsletter nonsense all they can muster up to try and do it. They're desperately grasping at straws. The race card. It never gets old.
@MBaxtonM so we just shouldn't bother talking about racist shit a candidate has said. oh i forgot, it's ron paul, that's why we shouldn't look into it. because he's just so special that we should ignore what we wouldn't ignore in others. you know, like being a creatard and a racist....
I subscribed to you 4 years ago because: A. You were funny. B. You spoke truth to power.
Now that its clear you were just schilling for different party, the goodwill and benefit-of-the-doubt I had in reserve has evaporated. Judging by the grand 304 views you've gotten, others agree. Your Youtube 15 minutes are over, but if you want to regurgitate party hack talking points, I'm sure CNN would love to have you.
@tovarishstulov typical ron paul fan. if you disagree with something he says or does, you're a shill and a slave to the mainstream media and a sheep. do you have to be a card carrying conspiracy theorist to be a ron paul supporter? from what i've seen so far it seems to be the case.
So Join the Ron Paul hate club lately??? Romney......the guy who took more freedom from Mass. then some Democrats? are you kidding me? The whole damn Republican side been up in arms about Obama care and then voted for the author of Romney care, what Obama care was based off. But all you can find to make fun of is old ass news letters...you guys are slipping way down.
@BillKiernan Ftm, who founds an LLC, appoints himself President of the corporation, his wife, Secretary, his daughter Treasurer, makes 7 other close family members equal-share partners, just to publish a few lousy newsletters?
It's one thing to claim he was too busy to competently preside over his own publishing business, but what about all the other corporate officers? They didn't notice what was going on? IMO, the issue of corporate irresponsibility is at the heart of this story.
@PostSurgeOperative there are posters here who are claiming he was too busy, or that his lack of skimming through his own newsletter is just a sign of how much he's about FREEDOM because "micromanagement is fascism." Never ceases to amaze me how every election cycle so many are willing to gouge the part of their brain out that's trying to remind them that politicians are full of shit and to become president, pretty much by design, you have to be the King of Full of Shit.
@PostSurgeOperative Even if it's a "corporate" oversight... if you can't run a freaking newsletter without horrible racist, homophobic, antiholocaust material all over the place, why should we trust you to run a country?
Oh yeah, because you plan to shrink the Fed government down to the size of a newsletter running operation... that you still can't properly monitor..
@kittydreamz86 "Oh yeah, because you plan to shrink the Fed government down to the size of a newsletter running operation... that you still can't properly monitor.."
@FreeThinkGuy oh right, he was SO busy he couldn't skim through a newsletter with his name on it to make sure he approved of the content. i don't care if he was a practicing doctor while working on a novel, a self portrait, with 8 kids and learning piano on the side, he could look at a newsletter with his name on it to make sure people aren't saying stupid things he didn't approve of in there. but anyway, put your faith in a politician. THIS TIME this one won't be a liar...
@DazmoTube yeah he was so busy he couldn't be bothered to skim through a newsletter with his name on it. Put your trust in a politician, it's worked out SO WELL for us all so far. Don't worry, he'll keep all his promises and make everything all better. He won't lie to you, just believe.
Will Ron Paul give me back my constitutional right to own a gun?Will he stand for American citizens who are being denied their rights like me,or just the elite?
Hilarious... AND a shameless and blatant effort to cash in on YouTube advertising revenue. The formula is simple Ron Paul Smear = Hits. I can't wait for your next video, with the title composed of top YouTube search terms, "Kardashian Megan Fox Nude Lesbian Sex Tape Exclusive Porn Pron Pr0n", with the mandatory YouTube thumbnail image of a woman in a flesh tone body suit reclined in a seductive pose.
Ron Paul is a racist? Sure. And Santorum is gay. No wait. Closet Santorum is very believable!
I got into a game of battlefield 3 last night and everybody was talking about Ron Paul. It was weird some of the bad information out there.One guy actually thought Ron Paul was going to disband the army. Another said he hated Ron Paul because war is good because it's human nature.
There are some frighteningly stupid people in this world, and apparently a lot of them can afford rigs that run Battlefield 3.
I think Ron paul is the best man for president right now even though i disagree with about half of everything he says.I understand what he is saying and it's not that i think he is wrong.He just feels like America should be run in a different way and i just don't want it run 100% the same way he wants.But a lot of Ron Paul fans just eat up everything he says without thinking for them selves and you say anything about him as if he isn't a perfect god they get pissy.
Come on, it's not like Ron Paul has spent all the money that was raised by those racist newsletters. What's that? I'm being told that Ron Paul HAS spent all the money raised by those racist newsletters. Awkward...
Lol - Biggest RON PAUL supporter ever since 07' - it's just a comedy show, but i don't think they nailed it on this one, didn't even laugh once. We are in the biggest fight for true conservatism and liberty and it doesn't help to have this kinda stuff out there. - Ron Paul isn't a racist he fights for everyone's personal individual liberties no matter what color skin. : )
I really cant believe you guys in the comments are so snowed on Ron Paul that you cant take a joke anymore. Stop being fan boys, wake up and smell the No Separation Of Church And State!
@dsjoakim35 If he were not in a serious race, maybe this would be funny. But it's not because it's completely false. He didn't have a mailing list full of racists. This is just stupid.
You guys are funny, but you could do like 3 mins of homework on google to find out everything you're screaming about. I guess we have to do the homework for you, jeez. Seriously. Here's Ben Swann on the newsletters /watch?v=rGH77lZsglU
@sonnybrown The only thing that Ben Swann has 'proved' is that Ron Paul, on at least one occasion, published a racist newsletter under the pseudonym 'James Powell'. Either that, or it proves that Ron Paul accepted racist articles submitted to him for publication in his newsletters. In either case, Ron Paul PUBLISHED and PROFITED from racist, homophobic, antisemitic, sexist, and Glenn Beck-style paranoid crackpot conspiracy-obsessed newsletters.
@PostSurgeOperative First of all, who signs their youtube comments? Second, did you even watch the report? He's been making those newsletters since the 70s and it wasn't till the 90s that a total of 10 sentences made it into his newsletters that were racist. It wasn't like he was churning out racist newsletters. Why am I even bothering talking to you when you obviously made up your mind to not give reality a second look. Good luck with that.
@sonnybrown Yes, I did watch the report, did you? All Ben Swann 'proves' is that one of Ron Paul's racist newsletters has a byline. For all you know, 'James Powell' is Paulsy's pseudonym.
A total of 10 sentences? Damn dude, the RonPaulogy is strong in you. The fact is that racist articles appeared in several of Ron Paul's newsletters, but it's not possible to know the full extent, because Ron Paul refuses to make back issues available to the public. Why? What is he trying to hide?
@PostSurgeOperative Seems like you got everything figured out, don't you? Complete proof Ron Paul is a racist. I stand corrected. Yes, you're right, he'd be so careful in his speechs and talking with friends and family to never utter such things, but he'll write a steamy newsletter and sell it to thousands of people. That sneaky character, that Paul. It all makes sense now. He never took into account that someone not racist would read them and bring them up later in life. Thanks for the insight.
@sonnybrown Ron Paul ADMITS authoring racist newsletters, DEFENDS them:
criticalreactor. com/ronpaul/newsletters/1996_Dallas_Morning_News. html
If you're truly interested in the facts, here's a link to an article with excerpts, and about a dozen jpegs of the original newsletters. Notice the dates span from 1988 through the early nineties. It was far more than '10 sentences'; ffs, this went on FOR YEARS!
@PostSurgeOperative God that's old. He explained that later in 01 in an interview. csmonitor com/USA/Elections/President/2011/1229/Racist-newsletter-timeline-What-Ron-Paul-has-said
Whats funny is there's only 5 lines sited in that article you linked and no pictures. I've seen them all man. You're not going to pull out a whole lot more than what is already on the record. You want to try again?
@PostSurgeOperative I just looked through both of those articles and nothing new. Yes those articles have a heavy racist tone. First it didn't start in 88. That one was a conspiracy article about trilateral commission etc. How do you explain this newsletter being made since 76 and not having anything of this nature till 88 and nothing racial till the 90s? I mean these stand so far apart from his life which has been a public one since the 70s. You're telling me he just said "fuck it" one day?
@sonnybrown What part of "Ron Paul refuses to make back issues available to the public" did you not understand?
Ron Paul founded 'Ron Paul and Associates, LLC' as a corporate liability shield for his publishing enterprise. He and 6 other Paul family members were corporate officers and/or equal-shareholders in the business, which earned them more than $900,000 in 1993 alone!
It's not up to me OR you to explain Paul's record as a publisher. He's the one who needs to explain himself.
Yes, you are getting us mad. Ron Paul IS NOT racist. He's been doing that Newsletter since 76. It wasn't till the 90s that there was racist content. And it was 10 sentences total and 4 consecutive newsletters. How can you not put 2 and 2 together? He didn't know about them until 96 when he went back to congress and his opponent found them. He has completely disavowed them and has taken responsibility for them. What in the hell more do you want? A reporter has already covered this recently
Ron Paul didn't have a mailing list full of racist. He was the publisher but wasn't the editor. He didn't know it was in there, when he found out 20 DAMN YEARS AGO he came out against it. No one can show me one racist comment from Ron Paul in the 50,000 plus videos of him speaking on youtube. This is just propaganda brought back up by the Main Stream Media because they have nothing else on him. Ron Paul 2012!!! You guys are funny though.
@trendsetter74 Saying this is old news, doesn’t make the facts go away.
Asking for video evidence, when the evidence of his newsletter--and his statements DEFENDING and ADMITTING authoring them--is right there and all over the place, makes you look very insincere in your demands for moar evidence. The evidence provided in the newsletters is enough.
If you truly care about moar evidence, then you should call on Dr. Pol to stop refusing to release back issues of his newsletters.
@PostSurgeOperative It is old news because he spoke out about this non-issue a long time ago. It was only brought back up because the MSM are scared of him and he is surging. Next, you need to learn how to spell before you go around trolling someone. "Moar" should be more. "Dr. Pol" is Dr. Paul. He never admitted to writing it so stop lying. The reason you can't produce 1 video of him saying something racist is because there isn't any. Your page is covered with Obama/van jones shit (tobecont.)
@PostSurgeOperative (part 2) You are a troll and not even a good one. You can't spell and have no facts to back up your propaganda. If you really are paid contractor then you are scared Ron Paul will get elected and put u ouy of business. Either way, you can lie all you want but that won't change that your boy Obama is not getting re-elected and you can't save him. Bottom line, either produce some real evidence or shut the fuck up. Your propaganda is doa with real Paul supporters. Fuck u troll!!
I don't dislike Paul for that news letter. Although, I do not approve of what was written in one issue of said newsletter. From what Paul has said I do not believe he is a racist. He allowed others to speak for him in his own name. That was a mistake but one which can be forgiven. His platform is solid and really could do a lot of good for America.
"car antenna in my d*** hole" LOL!!!
DaQuiz57 1 week ago
"Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think it's safe to assume that 95% of Blacks in that city are either semi-criminal or entirely criminal." was the newsletter quote. Any jackass can tell the author was using sarcasm.
palermo131 2 weeks ago
Racist. No question about it.
gulbirk 1 month ago 2
there Awesome
punkgurl412 1 month ago
Come on Jackie Jew-hater Pickens???????
bender183 1 month ago
lol
it was so funny i watched it twice
zrocks2001 1 month ago
- I'm not offended. I'm glad anytime Ron Paul's name is mentioned. Smart folks know that Ron Paul is far from being a racist even though he isn't very pleased with the job our half black/half white President, Barack Obama has done while he's been in office.
MrTexasClem 1 month ago
RON PAUL
kingston0708 1 month ago 2
VOTE RON PAUL!!!! The "ONLY" one telling the truth!
horsedood13 1 month ago
So now obama wants to clog up with chinese and brzilians Disney facilitating the inssuance of visas for China and Brzil in order to increate more TEMPORARY WORKS until the election.....and it intents to bill over 4 years in presidency! Did it work? This can be dangerous to USA because the visas will be less judgmental....
frankin235 1 month ago
@frankin235 wtf?
DaQuiz57 1 week ago
LOL, that was harsh!
schlumbucket 1 month ago
^Hey guys ! WE have a REAL PROBLEM ! CULTURAL FASCIST CONGRESS ! GEMA :EMI;SONY WARNER ( Thats right the Germans ! Music is a freedom that should be shared and enjoyed by all the people of the planet ! God damnit Ten Years -PUBLIC DOMAIN ! Fuck these culure fasciast lawyers ,you tube, google.time warner, sony ,emi Gema etc. making money of of shit they never heard or enjoy ! So FUCK THEM ALL !! FUCK SOPA ! The Freedom of speech -ain't that a song ! YOU FUCKIN LAWYERS !! they can keep GAGA !
steviebkhall 1 month ago
I love America! The Americans drove The British, defeated the Germans and faced the Russians, all with much blood, sweat and tears...... But I have the impression tha, as the Romans did not resis the Barbarian invasion, The United States sucumbed to the african invasion, see: michaels jordan/jackson obahma and more....
frankin235 1 month ago in playlist Mais vídeos de travisandjonathan
I love America! The Americans drove The British, defeated the Germans and faced the Russians, and all with much blood, sweat and tears.... But i have the imprression tha, as the Romans did not resist the invasion of the Barbarian, The United States sucumbed to the african invasion, see: michael jordan/jackson/obhrama and more.
frankin235 1 month ago
@frankin235 you are clearly trying to start an argument
amrfts 1 month ago
I used to with with jonathan at ucla for a while as part of a school program. He's really cool :)
hybridsolution 1 month ago
I was going to make a comment here,but I am pressed for time as I need to get my newsletter finished first. I hope you antenna is not one of those that's embedded in the margins of the windshield...lol
tps607 1 month ago
HAHAHA @ the jackie broyles racist newsletter
JohntheConquerorBand 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election
What's wrong with racism? I run in races all the time. 5k, sometimes even the 10k. It's good exercise.
CommentorX 1 month ago
Sometimes you are funny and sometimes you aren't. Sometimes you make points with your humor and sometimes you don't.
Jackie, I forgive you for not overseeing your newsletter better and don't think you are racist.
GreatG0dOm 1 month ago
Funny skit, but when you consider the real and immediate problem of over-incarceration versus some articles of questionable taste printed two decades ago, I think it becomes clear that maybe the newsletter thing is a big deal over nothing.
blackturtleshow 1 month ago
Liberatarian to Texan ,and Arizonian to Republican ? Flip -flop ! What about his lawyer son ? Texas to Kentucky ? ARE YOU people intelligence ? Oh, yeah ,Oh Yeah .They all suck a BIG ONE ! Thanks guys . Kusinich ,that''s my guy !
steviebkhall 1 month ago
@RoachBoySD "You just don't run for President with this kind of so called serious scandal of this nature,"
You can if you're a Republican.
Especially one from the West Texas.
SpitfireOFatj 1 month ago
I wonder how many idiots are now going to try that car antenna thing.
SpitfireOFatj 1 month ago
LOL
mtzlypk 1 month ago
very funny.
can i subscribe more than one time..
playtimewalter 1 month ago
Romney has 14 delegates. Ron Paul has 10. He's still a contender. RON PAUL 2012!!!
freakylocz14 1 month ago
This actually explains why Ron Paul believes big govt can't work. If he screwed up so bad running a little old newsletter, of COURSE he doesn't believe anyone can be successful with a Fed Govt organizing hundreds of millions of people.
kittydreamz86 1 month ago
Do a video on the NDAA
MrAjjordan1980 1 month ago
@cheeseaura That news report is such bullshit.
This is an objective thing, not an opinion.
Firstly, admitting you hire ghost writers is already damaging for such an "honest" guy. "you don't have time for what you hired them for" 8-12 pages a month? What the fuck was he doing? And he's still fully responsible.
"he's never spoken like the language in those particular letters" Fucking fool, that doesn't matter.
"He fired the person upon discovery" No proof of this has ever come up.
niriop 1 month ago
Blah. You guys are funnier than this. I liked the Jack Lalane comment on your previous one, but it seems like your beating a dead horse on this one. If your trying to give the RP supporters a laugh, I think you are missing it. Half of them are so fanatical they will disavow family for the guy, so getting subscribers on Youtube by bashing him won't do much, but the trolls will be chuckling. ;-) To all the Ron Paul haters, your liberal asses are on a sinking ship.
UnrelentingFreedom 1 month ago
Ron Paul won't share a bathroom with a homosexual. Also, Red State Update doesn't like Ron Paul. It's humor, yes, but they also don't like him. So, all you people with plushie Ron Paul penises in your mouth, if you have any intelligence, downvote this video. I'm upvoting it, but I don't like the racist, senile loon.
sephirich 1 month ago
@cheeseaura The article "The Freedom To Oppress: Why Ron Paul's Old Racist Newsletters Matter" on Crooks and Liars
niriop 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012
blokcar 1 month ago
Andy Kaufman is smiling boys! You may have pissed a bunch of people off, but you held to your comedic truth. And you're just brilliant!
I am so proud. Just so proud!
2tsaybow 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election 3
Fuck Ron Paul!
swingbeatnik7 1 month ago
Hey You Rednecks !! ELECTIONS ARE FUCKING FAKE !
Mindcrime1994 1 month ago
@Mindcrime1994 Crazy boy! Yelling at comedians.
2tsaybow 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election
Did Ron Paul really earn millions of dollars on those newsletters?
ClearPee 1 month ago
@ClearPee No he didn't make million of dollars off of the newsletters. They barely broke even with cost and then after so long they started losing, so they stopped printing them.
oneqwerty 1 month ago
Ron Paul for President 2012. Vote with your wallet after that and buy more ammo. :) More mags too. :) Ne Copula Nobiscum! MGK/GDW!
Libertytreeradio 1 month ago
DR RON PAUL 2012 OR WORLD WAR 3?
australiap 1 month ago
NEED BETTER WRITING
WARLOCKakaTROLL 1 month ago
It's OK, Jackie... it was WAY back in the day.... the Nineties. As a liberal American man, I forgive you. I believe in redemption. And fuck the minorities who don't.
AncientAtheist 1 month ago
Dunlap means, "that massive black Republican vote".
AncientAtheist 1 month ago
I'M GETTIN MAD.
livevil1989 1 month ago
You guys just get better and better! HA!
shadowfaxx1 1 month ago
Carl Winslow signaled the beginning of the race war? Carl Winslow was on Arsenio?
yellkaos 1 month ago
@RoachBoySD How do you know James Powell' isn't a pseudonym for Ron Paul? Claiming it's a different writing style means absolutely nothing. Any professional writer will tell you they write in the style, tone, and voice best suited to reach the targeted audience.
The fact is, Dr. Pol was the PUBLISHER of those newsletters. Several close family members were involved in their production, and profited to the tune of MILLIONS of dollars from the newsletters. Why are you defending that?
PostSurgeOperative 1 month ago 16
@PostSurgeOperative Source?Proof? Also he wrote several pages and there were a few paragraphs that he didn't read and he doesn't publish them on his own..
ClearPee 1 month ago
@ClearPee Sitting there asking for evidence, when the evidence is right there and is all over the place, makes you look very insincere in your demands for more evidence. Oh, and that doesn’t make the avalanche of evidence go away either.
mrdestructo. com/2011/12/game-over-scans-of-over-50-ron-paul. html
criticalreactor. com/ronpaul/newsletters/1996_Dallas_Morning_News. html
PostSurgeOperative 1 month ago 14
@PostSurgeOperative Why do you have not one but two links to racist newsletters favorited on your browser?
CommentorX 1 month ago
@PostSurgeOperative The editor is responsible for content, not the publisher. Saying tht people who were associated with him are racist and therefore he is racist, is like saying those politicians who accept money from the drug companies are pharmacists. And Ron Paul hasn't taken corporate money becasue it isn't offered to him because he can't be bought
shizont 1 month ago
@shizont WRONG, Paulunteer! The publisher is ultimately responsible for what is published. It's like the difference between a movie's producer, and the guy who wrote the screenplay.
PostSurgeOperative 1 month ago
shizont 1 month ago
@PostSurgeOperative you dont have any facts.. do you?
kingston0708 1 month ago
Oh, Jackie lol. I lol about Southern Living lol. Omg country radio hahaha! Silver coins lol.
LittlePinky82 1 month ago
"....you made it sound like country radio!" LOL!
alkhami1 1 month ago
@cheeseaura Nope, it is so, he directed content according to all accounts.
"hired a ghost writer" How dishonest! He is truly is a lying bastard!
"to check a very old newsletter" Damn you're fucking stupid; it was being published 1978-1996 under his name, went out every month, and was only 8-12 pages; there's simply no excuse.
Nope, Paul himself is quoted in that article; he admitted he did that interview in 2001 although he "admits" he lied, but its obvious he's lying about lying.
niriop 1 month ago
funny!
BlackAzzRobb 1 month ago
@cheeseaura Yes they are; we know he was heavily involved in the processing of editing and promoting them; there's no excuse for him not knowing content. Even then, why would something with 1) Your signature 2) Your name on it, and 3) Claims to represent your views--which is all by your direct order--be something that you didn't even notice until more than 20 years of them being published? That's laughable.
Also, he admitted authorship back in 1996, quoting the articles themselves.
niriop 1 month ago
you r on a roll,guys.keep it up.
dobbsiancant 1 month ago
They may be presented as jokes, but the Ron Paul criticisms in themselves are completely valid.
niriop 1 month ago 3
"Racist Tom?!?!?" LMFAO-- U guys r the best
Rajhathetiger 1 month ago
I don't knwo how you resolve any of this - all I know is Obama is killing brown people in the middle east everyday and no one says boo
marniespeaks 1 month ago
does Mr Slaw support Ron Paul?
Hypnojive 1 month ago
Im a HUGE Paul supporter and I still love these guys.
HalfBornUnicornFetus 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election
"Why do so many racists like us?"
Well Jackie, they can't help it, anyone with taste likes the RSU.
SniperWalrus 1 month ago
....oh, i see what you did there.... still a funny video
Iron2199 1 month ago
"Why do so many racist like us?"
"DON"T ASK."
Shot coffee out my nose on that one guys. Thank you for the funny video.. .Not so much the 2nd degree burns in my nasal passage.
caveman73 1 month ago 3
What happened to all the beer cans?
sheltercrow 1 month ago 3
Even if Dr. Paul personally wrote every word of the newsletter, which he didn't, or supported every word of it, which he didn't, this is still peanuts compared to the insane babble and unethical behavior of the other Republican candidates. The media, and apparently independent, amateur comedy writers, want SO badly to undermine Dr. Paul's appeal and this is newsletter nonsense all they can muster up to try and do it. They're desperately grasping at straws. The race card. It never gets old.
MBaxtonM 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election
@MBaxtonM so we just shouldn't bother talking about racist shit a candidate has said. oh i forgot, it's ron paul, that's why we shouldn't look into it. because he's just so special that we should ignore what we wouldn't ignore in others. you know, like being a creatard and a racist....
BillKiernan 1 month ago
I subscribed to you 4 years ago because: A. You were funny. B. You spoke truth to power.
Now that its clear you were just schilling for different party, the goodwill and benefit-of-the-doubt I had in reserve has evaporated. Judging by the grand 304 views you've gotten, others agree. Your Youtube 15 minutes are over, but if you want to regurgitate party hack talking points, I'm sure CNN would love to have you.
tovarishstulov 1 month ago
@tovarishstulov typical ron paul fan. if you disagree with something he says or does, you're a shill and a slave to the mainstream media and a sheep. do you have to be a card carrying conspiracy theorist to be a ron paul supporter? from what i've seen so far it seems to be the case.
BillKiernan 1 month ago
@BillKiernan Ron Paul is maintstream? Lol... we wish.
heresmokethis 1 month ago
@heresmokethis not what i said at all.
BillKiernan 1 month ago
So Join the Ron Paul hate club lately??? Romney......the guy who took more freedom from Mass. then some Democrats? are you kidding me? The whole damn Republican side been up in arms about Obama care and then voted for the author of Romney care, what Obama care was based off. But all you can find to make fun of is old ass news letters...you guys are slipping way down.
OutlawShooters 1 month ago
It looks like all your former writers dislike this video.
res401 1 month ago
LOL "Kinda like country radio" love it!
WizKil 1 month ago
Ron Paul cracks me up. WHO THE FUCK doesn't read THEIR OWN newsletter to see what's been written?
BillKiernan 1 month ago 14
@BillKiernan Ftm, who founds an LLC, appoints himself President of the corporation, his wife, Secretary, his daughter Treasurer, makes 7 other close family members equal-share partners, just to publish a few lousy newsletters?
It's one thing to claim he was too busy to competently preside over his own publishing business, but what about all the other corporate officers? They didn't notice what was going on? IMO, the issue of corporate irresponsibility is at the heart of this story.
PostSurgeOperative 1 month ago 3
@PostSurgeOperative there are posters here who are claiming he was too busy, or that his lack of skimming through his own newsletter is just a sign of how much he's about FREEDOM because "micromanagement is fascism." Never ceases to amaze me how every election cycle so many are willing to gouge the part of their brain out that's trying to remind them that politicians are full of shit and to become president, pretty much by design, you have to be the King of Full of Shit.
BillKiernan 1 month ago
@PostSurgeOperative Even if it's a "corporate" oversight... if you can't run a freaking newsletter without horrible racist, homophobic, antiholocaust material all over the place, why should we trust you to run a country?
Oh yeah, because you plan to shrink the Fed government down to the size of a newsletter running operation... that you still can't properly monitor..
kittydreamz86 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@kittydreamz86 "Oh yeah, because you plan to shrink the Fed government down to the size of a newsletter running operation... that you still can't properly monitor.."
Okay,...THAT was funny....
SpitfireOFatj 1 month ago
@BillKiernan Lmao I know right? And for 33 yrs.
LittlePinky82 1 month ago
@BillKiernan A practicing Doctor.
FreeThinkGuy 1 month ago
@FreeThinkGuy oh right, he was SO busy he couldn't skim through a newsletter with his name on it to make sure he approved of the content. i don't care if he was a practicing doctor while working on a novel, a self portrait, with 8 kids and learning piano on the side, he could look at a newsletter with his name on it to make sure people aren't saying stupid things he didn't approve of in there. but anyway, put your faith in a politician. THIS TIME this one won't be a liar...
BillKiernan 1 month ago
@BillKiernan
Someone with other things to do. Micromanagement is fascism.
DazmoTube 1 month ago
@DazmoTube yeah he was so busy he couldn't be bothered to skim through a newsletter with his name on it. Put your trust in a politician, it's worked out SO WELL for us all so far. Don't worry, he'll keep all his promises and make everything all better. He won't lie to you, just believe.
BillKiernan 1 month ago
@BillKiernan Oh, he's gonna lie. That's what politicians do.
Did you think there were politicians who were in the politics game for something other than fame, money, power?
Anyone with something BETTER to do with their time would not make social parasitism their entire career.
DazmoTube 1 month ago
I'm a convicted felon.
Will Ron Paul give me back my constitutional right to own a gun?Will he stand for American citizens who are being denied their rights like me,or just the elite?
JohnLeePedimore 1 month ago
Southern Living??? LOL
TomHendricksMusea 1 month ago
Comment removed
BigBadassR 1 month ago
Even the fucktard have to talk about Ron Paul.
shanejoel2 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election
We all know the racist thing is a joke. Ron Paul 2012!
garrethdavis 1 month ago
"It wasn't that bad, you make it sound like country radio."
SoyJames 1 month ago
Making Paulbots mad is like shooting gerbil with a bazooka, but these two show how much fun that actually is. Gerbil. With a bazooka!
tmafkap 1 month ago 8
Brillant and hilarious!
DinMorsPimp 1 month ago 3
Jackie is a riot, and effectively sums up the RP newsletter fiasco!
audadvnc 1 month ago 3
Hilarious... AND a shameless and blatant effort to cash in on YouTube advertising revenue. The formula is simple Ron Paul Smear = Hits. I can't wait for your next video, with the title composed of top YouTube search terms, "Kardashian Megan Fox Nude Lesbian Sex Tape Exclusive Porn Pron Pr0n", with the mandatory YouTube thumbnail image of a woman in a flesh tone body suit reclined in a seductive pose.
Ron Paul is a racist? Sure. And Santorum is gay. No wait. Closet Santorum is very believable!
Liberty4Ever 1 month ago
RACIST TOM? LMAO
RaynMan718 1 month ago
Newsletters or not, but the fun part is - Iowa REPUBLICAN farmers opted for government subsidies over free-market and liberty.
ForLiberty888 1 month ago
Yup it was different times.
Funny skit guys...lol
Ron Paul 2012
Uriel1816 1 month ago
the good ole days , a dirt clod for cristmass,,,,,
killerbydayornight 1 month ago
thanks, you fellers got it goin'.
hyoidbone54 1 month ago 2
I got into a game of battlefield 3 last night and everybody was talking about Ron Paul. It was weird some of the bad information out there.One guy actually thought Ron Paul was going to disband the army. Another said he hated Ron Paul because war is good because it's human nature.
There are some frighteningly stupid people in this world, and apparently a lot of them can afford rigs that run Battlefield 3.
Funny video guys. Keep up the good work.
BlindMaphisto 1 month ago
You guys are the best. ☺☼♥
eveningbuzz 1 month ago
You guys are two weeks late... this smear no longer works.
Yes it was funny.. but no I am not impressed.
I dont want Obama, I dont want Newt RMoney or Sanitorium... call me a crazy cult member if you want.
jjcale1111 1 month ago
I'm a Ron Paul supporter here to specifically command all other Ron Paul supporters to find this video entertaining.
thejobloshow 1 month ago 2
In come the paulites, blind and crazy.
KnightTemplar108 1 month ago 6
I think Ron paul is the best man for president right now even though i disagree with about half of everything he says.I understand what he is saying and it's not that i think he is wrong.He just feels like America should be run in a different way and i just don't want it run 100% the same way he wants.But a lot of Ron Paul fans just eat up everything he says without thinking for them selves and you say anything about him as if he isn't a perfect god they get pissy.
nowwithmorekick 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election
@nowwithmorekick Ron Paul is like Jesus.I like him but i don't like his followers. To many fanboys of Ron Paul.
nowwithmorekick 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election
that was hilarious.
ratholin 1 month ago
Come on, it's not like Ron Paul has spent all the money that was raised by those racist newsletters. What's that? I'm being told that Ron Paul HAS spent all the money raised by those racist newsletters. Awkward...
boloboffin 1 month ago 3
@candiceevans1 - Take the gold bar out of your arse & lighten up. You sound ALMOST like a humo(u)rless loony cult member...
Gjeorje 1 month ago 4
@candiceevans1 The worst thing about Ron Paul is he's a Republican
PixelDansIronFist 1 month ago
Although I don't believe little Ron Paul is an actual racist (despite his racist comments), I don't believe he is presidential material either.
catquack 1 month ago
don't you wish you had that silver now or even that gold bar?
Wolfsbane909 1 month ago
Love this. Prepare for a tsunami of Paul cultists though.
mw2000 1 month ago 4
Lol - Biggest RON PAUL supporter ever since 07' - it's just a comedy show, but i don't think they nailed it on this one, didn't even laugh once. We are in the biggest fight for true conservatism and liberty and it doesn't help to have this kinda stuff out there. - Ron Paul isn't a racist he fights for everyone's personal individual liberties no matter what color skin. : )
CAinfowarrior 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election
I really cant believe you guys in the comments are so snowed on Ron Paul that you cant take a joke anymore. Stop being fan boys, wake up and smell the No Separation Of Church And State!
dsjoakim35 1 month ago 11
@dsjoakim35 If he were not in a serious race, maybe this would be funny. But it's not because it's completely false. He didn't have a mailing list full of racists. This is just stupid.
sonnybrown 1 month ago
@dsjoakim35 stop being a communist bigot and leave people who happen to have a religion alone! Jerkoff!
ChadWardenTV 1 month ago
@ChadWardenTV Wow :) Good luck to you and your brain.
dsjoakim35 1 month ago
@dsjoakim35 says the useful idiot
ChadWardenTV 1 month ago
You guys are funny, but you could do like 3 mins of homework on google to find out everything you're screaming about. I guess we have to do the homework for you, jeez. Seriously. Here's Ben Swann on the newsletters /watch?v=rGH77lZsglU
sonnybrown 1 month ago
@sonnybrown The only thing that Ben Swann has 'proved' is that Ron Paul, on at least one occasion, published a racist newsletter under the pseudonym 'James Powell'. Either that, or it proves that Ron Paul accepted racist articles submitted to him for publication in his newsletters. In either case, Ron Paul PUBLISHED and PROFITED from racist, homophobic, antisemitic, sexist, and Glenn Beck-style paranoid crackpot conspiracy-obsessed newsletters.
Good luck with that!
~MOCKsie ;-p
PostSurgeOperative 1 month ago 6
@PostSurgeOperative First of all, who signs their youtube comments? Second, did you even watch the report? He's been making those newsletters since the 70s and it wasn't till the 90s that a total of 10 sentences made it into his newsletters that were racist. It wasn't like he was churning out racist newsletters. Why am I even bothering talking to you when you obviously made up your mind to not give reality a second look. Good luck with that.
sonnybrown 1 month ago
@sonnybrown Yes, I did watch the report, did you? All Ben Swann 'proves' is that one of Ron Paul's racist newsletters has a byline. For all you know, 'James Powell' is Paulsy's pseudonym.
A total of 10 sentences? Damn dude, the RonPaulogy is strong in you. The fact is that racist articles appeared in several of Ron Paul's newsletters, but it's not possible to know the full extent, because Ron Paul refuses to make back issues available to the public. Why? What is he trying to hide?
PostSurgeOperative 1 month ago 4
@PostSurgeOperative Seems like you got everything figured out, don't you? Complete proof Ron Paul is a racist. I stand corrected. Yes, you're right, he'd be so careful in his speechs and talking with friends and family to never utter such things, but he'll write a steamy newsletter and sell it to thousands of people. That sneaky character, that Paul. It all makes sense now. He never took into account that someone not racist would read them and bring them up later in life. Thanks for the insight.
sonnybrown 1 month ago
@sonnybrown Ron Paul ADMITS authoring racist newsletters, DEFENDS them:
criticalreactor. com/ronpaul/newsletters/1996_Dallas_Morning_News. html
If you're truly interested in the facts, here's a link to an article with excerpts, and about a dozen jpegs of the original newsletters. Notice the dates span from 1988 through the early nineties. It was far more than '10 sentences'; ffs, this went on FOR YEARS!
newsone. com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/why-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters-matter/
PostSurgeOperative 1 month ago 2
@PostSurgeOperative God that's old. He explained that later in 01 in an interview. csmonitor com/USA/Elections/President/2011/1229/Racist-newsletter-timeline-What-Ron-Paul-has-said
Whats funny is there's only 5 lines sited in that article you linked and no pictures. I've seen them all man. You're not going to pull out a whole lot more than what is already on the record. You want to try again?
sonnybrown 1 month ago
@PostSurgeOperative nevermind, I didn't see the last link you put in
sonnybrown 1 month ago
@PostSurgeOperative I just looked through both of those articles and nothing new. Yes those articles have a heavy racist tone. First it didn't start in 88. That one was a conspiracy article about trilateral commission etc. How do you explain this newsletter being made since 76 and not having anything of this nature till 88 and nothing racial till the 90s? I mean these stand so far apart from his life which has been a public one since the 70s. You're telling me he just said "fuck it" one day?
sonnybrown 1 month ago
@sonnybrown What part of "Ron Paul refuses to make back issues available to the public" did you not understand?
Ron Paul founded 'Ron Paul and Associates, LLC' as a corporate liability shield for his publishing enterprise. He and 6 other Paul family members were corporate officers and/or equal-shareholders in the business, which earned them more than $900,000 in 1993 alone!
It's not up to me OR you to explain Paul's record as a publisher. He's the one who needs to explain himself.
PostSurgeOperative 1 month ago 7
Yes, you are getting us mad. Ron Paul IS NOT racist. He's been doing that Newsletter since 76. It wasn't till the 90s that there was racist content. And it was 10 sentences total and 4 consecutive newsletters. How can you not put 2 and 2 together? He didn't know about them until 96 when he went back to congress and his opponent found them. He has completely disavowed them and has taken responsibility for them. What in the hell more do you want? A reporter has already covered this recently
sonnybrown 1 month ago
Ron Paul didn't have a mailing list full of racist. He was the publisher but wasn't the editor. He didn't know it was in there, when he found out 20 DAMN YEARS AGO he came out against it. No one can show me one racist comment from Ron Paul in the 50,000 plus videos of him speaking on youtube. This is just propaganda brought back up by the Main Stream Media because they have nothing else on him. Ron Paul 2012!!! You guys are funny though.
trendsetter74 1 month ago
@trendsetter74 Saying this is old news, doesn’t make the facts go away.
Asking for video evidence, when the evidence of his newsletter--and his statements DEFENDING and ADMITTING authoring them--is right there and all over the place, makes you look very insincere in your demands for moar evidence. The evidence provided in the newsletters is enough.
If you truly care about moar evidence, then you should call on Dr. Pol to stop refusing to release back issues of his newsletters.
PostSurgeOperative 1 month ago 4
@PostSurgeOperative It is old news because he spoke out about this non-issue a long time ago. It was only brought back up because the MSM are scared of him and he is surging. Next, you need to learn how to spell before you go around trolling someone. "Moar" should be more. "Dr. Pol" is Dr. Paul. He never admitted to writing it so stop lying. The reason you can't produce 1 video of him saying something racist is because there isn't any. Your page is covered with Obama/van jones shit (tobecont.)
trendsetter74 1 month ago
@PostSurgeOperative (part 2) You are a troll and not even a good one. You can't spell and have no facts to back up your propaganda. If you really are paid contractor then you are scared Ron Paul will get elected and put u ouy of business. Either way, you can lie all you want but that won't change that your boy Obama is not getting re-elected and you can't save him. Bottom line, either produce some real evidence or shut the fuck up. Your propaganda is doa with real Paul supporters. Fuck u troll!!
trendsetter74 1 month ago
@cheeseaura totally
sonnybrown 1 month ago
I don't dislike Paul for that news letter. Although, I do not approve of what was written in one issue of said newsletter. From what Paul has said I do not believe he is a racist. He allowed others to speak for him in his own name. That was a mistake but one which can be forgiven. His platform is solid and really could do a lot of good for America.
freedomwv 1 month ago in playlist 2012 Presidential Election