Also, how did polar bears and penguins get to the Middle East, or home AFTER the flood? I will deliver the next line in all caps, so the "Cronies" understand : THERE WAS NO FLOOD!! NOAH WAS A MYTH!!!!
Wow!! A bunch of anecdotal evidence from people claiming they found Noah's Ark?!? It MUST be true!!! Wait, what? The Ark wasn't anywhere near the size it needed to be to carry all the animals, not to mention the feed for them for 150 days?..... Sorry, Billy. Still a myth.
God's moral standards? No thanks! Look at how God rewards child sacrifice for Jephthah, how he arranges the killing of Job's beloved children just because Job trusted God, how God commands his people to rip little girls from the bloody arms of their murdered mothers and take them home to share with YHVH's priests, how he approves of public rape to punish people. Look at the command to practice ritualized cannibalism! What a wonderful pattern for morality!
Pastor Billy showes not Just the Bible but outside evidence ( science and learned men who were not Bible belivers to show this , please do the same ( proof ) when posting your disagreements cause some of us are here to learn not veiw an agument ok?
to believe anything other than what the bible tells us.I hope that the non believers see and hear this things soon for thier sakes.I hope I have made some sense to someone and im sorry if I have mis spelled somethings.God Bless All Of You.
So the unbeliever really has the most to loose if you look at it from that stand point.I dont want to see anyone go to hell to suffer horribly.Not even the ones that dont believe and make fun of us that do believe.We will all have to wait and find out.Like I said us believers have nothing to loose.The reason we believe goes past even the words of the Bible.We have excepirenced God in our lives.We have witnessed things and heard things that support what we have witnessed that wont allow us to
I believe In Jesus and God also all is wonders and power.If you dont want to believe it is your business really.The truth is laid out before us all.The way I look at it is Ive got nothing to loose by believing in God.If were right about him and his words are true,which I believe they are,then we go to heaven.If were wrong so what then we die and become nothing but worm food.The un believer has something to loose.If were right, and we believe we are, than you unblievers will go to hell.
If you are right, can you explain where the delta is? How did the river flow uphill to carve out the canyon? How come when Mount Helen's erupted it formed a structure comparable to the Grand Canyon in all but size (it's twenty times smaller, but still big) in a matter of hours? If it can happen once in history, why do you assume it never happened before? And I ask again... how could the river flow uphill?
@thessalonian71 he says a River can not flow up hill so it had to be the flood cause rivers cant flow up hill review the clip you see moere each time ;)
@hoppetoppe prove it wasnt .. He gave evidence so if you'd like to debate it show your facts ok? fighting or arguing doesnt help in an intelectual conversation in fact its anoying showing nothng but ingnorance hoppetoppe
You have summed it up right there krisv001. You believe Pastor Billy because you WANT to believe him. It is also why you see his laughable attempts at scientific explanations....and by 'laughable' I mean to 99.9% of scientists themselves.... as 'so much evidence'.
I mean to hold that view you must have to actively avoid non-christian science sources in case they ruin your perspective don't you?
NO that is not what I said ... read it again plse, what I said is that despite all the evidence people still won't believe that the worldwide flood of Noah was a real historical event.
Open your eyes. the reason people don't want to believe the evidence for a Noahic flood is because for every sliver of evidence for the flood the evidence against it is a thousand times stronger. You think historians and scientists are all idiots and you have some indsight over their disciplines that they do not?
How can all todays canines descend from just two in that way? To believe that, and given the minimal genetic diverstiry tied up in a single breeding pair, YOU must believe in the power of evolution to a much greater degree that any biologist. The only reason we can breed so many varied dogs is because the wolves they descend from have huge genetic diversity built up from millions of years of mutations. Tell me, oh great Pastor, where your dogs' genetic diversity is coming from?
A horrible storm is three or four inches of rainfall an hour. Double that amount and things get really serious. At about 12 inches of rainfall an hour you are experiencing rain about as heavy as we have on record..ever!
This 'horrible storm' is about 30+FEET of water PER HOUR every hour for 40 days! No modern boat would survive ten minutes, let alone a wooden boat larger that any that has ever been built to be seaworthy witrhout extensive metal bracing.
Amazingly passionate rhetoric. It is such a tragic waste of human effort and talent that so much energies are invested in propping up mythological hogwash. There was no worldwide flood and there is no evidence for a worldwide flood. The only way you get away with your arguments is by appealing to people who are almost totally scientifically illiterate.
noelplum99 - you might want to get on the internet & google the world wide flood as there are many different countries whose histories point to a flood in their area that killed all the people. Science doesn't really have naything to do with it. if you can't prove that God doesn't exist by using science or evolution, then you can't ask to prove Him with science or evolution. But history HAS proven it. I'll take history over science.
I'm not asking to prove God, we are talking about the historical and scientific accuracy of a worldwide flood - not a local flood, but a worldwide one that covered all the land. now ofc many cultures have a flood myth, as they have a sea monster myth and a winged beast myth and a god myth (none of which you accept other than your own ofc).
Secondly, given that the judaic story is taken from the babylonian story is it any wonder it concords.
Anyway, as a lover of history perhaps you should.....
....check out the terrible historical consequences of incorporating the babylonian story of noah into the torah. Incorporate someone elses myth and someone elses deity into your own and the cracks will show. Please, watch my video 'From Noah to Abraham' if you have the time and let me know your response/thoughts.
noelplum99 - I am talking about proof of a world wide flood.If there are so many cultures who speak of a flood that correspond exactly with the Genesis acc't. They even have close to the same spelling of the name. In Job 40 & 41 - it speaks of creatures who have scales so strong that a spear is as a dart & a one whose tail is like a cedar tree. The dead Sea scrolls back up these historic moments. They didn't have videos to capture it & it was very important to pass on correct & true info.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I don't understand. Why wouldn't the dead sea scrolls back up what is in the tanakh? The scrolls date from no earlier than about 200BC long long after the story of the flood formed part of the torah.
The big problem for you is that their are historical relics that pre-date the flood that would have been wiped out by it. We have cave paintings tens of thousands of years old; egyptian mummys' up to 6000 years old; dendochronological records in germany and US extending, unbroken, over 8000 years.
noelplum99 - You don't understand because you don't want to understand. Have you googled any info to show that many cultures have the same exact story of a world wide flood? You believe ancient drawings, but you won't believe ancient writings? Why? Because the ancient writings we're discussing have to do with believing in God. If you believe in the flood, then you have to accept the belief in God, but because you refuse to believe in God,you dispute the flood,even with proof from other cultures
Just one very simple question: how on earth do you think these people who had no idea whatsoever what the shape or extent of the world was had any grounds whatsoever to assert that anything was 'worldwide'??
Secondly, why do YOU not believe in thier Gods? Why do you REFUSE to accept their Gods given that you accept these babylonian stories to be true and thereby accept that THEIR deities caused the floods??
You have hijacked another cultures story and are claiming it for Yahweh!
Of the evidence I have read, there seems to be much support for a localised flood, possibly around the Euphrates.
however, you are asking me to throw away science almost entirely. If the flood story is true then science simply does not work and we should just abandon the scientific method. geology is useless; biology is broken; physics is useless; archaeology is unfounded; dendochronology is erroneous; engineering is baseless... i could go on and on. Your flood story breaks every single....
....scientific advancement we have made and casts doubt on all our endeavours. by all means you have your flood, go on believing in it. however, be consistent and never ever trust science again because if science can be so utterly wrong over this then science is junk, worthless junk.
PS: If you really don't understand WHY this is science-breaking then i can understand why you still accept the flood. however, for fuller explanations this would have to go to pm.
@noelplum99 - then let's go to pm - there is not enough room in here to properly answer questions & situations. I don't believe in their gods because most of their gods are stone gods that can't do anything for me. Their stone gods didn't create the earth or the universe & most of their beliefs had them sacrificing their children to fire to appease their god so tha they can have reain & sun & moon everyday. my God doesn't require that of me. Please pm me & let's discuss this more. Thanks.
well, I'm not going to pm you just for the sake of it kamicka. My call to pm was simply if you wanted clarification on any of the claims on the impact of science i was making, because i am acutely aware these are claims I have made here without backing them up.
Just one point:
Your elevation of yahweh is unfair. His status as the time the books of the torah were written was no different from that of other deities worshipped in the area - sophistication only followed after so, please, feel...
...free to worship Shamash, Ahura Mazda, or Ba'al (or his father El) and elevate their stature in the same way your predecessors have with Yahweh (none of these gods are 'stone gods' btw)
What a pathetic trick that is to avoid considering another's arguments. If you want to cover your eyes and ears and pretend that other opinions don't exist then at least have the intellectual honesty to admit that is what you are doing rather than just attributing any opinions that challenge your own as belonging to the devil.
noelplum99 - But I guess if the Hebrews/Israeli's/Jews had drawn pictures like the Egyptians instead of using real language (sign of intelligence), maybe people would've believed the flood instead of disputing it.
Interesting!! I've heard of a few expeditions and supposed photos of Noah's Ark, but I've never heard of historical accounts of the ark still existing during past times!! Great vid. Pastor Billy!!
Oh Gawd. I was going to finish the video...Then Billy played "The Hovind Card".
I'm out.
TheAmericanCthulhu 1 month ago
Also, how did polar bears and penguins get to the Middle East, or home AFTER the flood? I will deliver the next line in all caps, so the "Cronies" understand : THERE WAS NO FLOOD!! NOAH WAS A MYTH!!!!
TheAmericanCthulhu 1 month ago
Wow!! A bunch of anecdotal evidence from people claiming they found Noah's Ark?!? It MUST be true!!! Wait, what? The Ark wasn't anywhere near the size it needed to be to carry all the animals, not to mention the feed for them for 150 days?..... Sorry, Billy. Still a myth.
TheAmericanCthulhu 1 month ago
What is a kind?
gastarbeiter1 9 months ago
At 10:38 this video freezes up and stops playing=(
Bugil2000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God's moral standards? No thanks! Look at how God rewards child sacrifice for Jephthah, how he arranges the killing of Job's beloved children just because Job trusted God, how God commands his people to rip little girls from the bloody arms of their murdered mothers and take them home to share with YHVH's priests, how he approves of public rape to punish people. Look at the command to practice ritualized cannibalism! What a wonderful pattern for morality!
lizazoon 1 year ago
Pastor Billy showes not Just the Bible but outside evidence ( science and learned men who were not Bible belivers to show this , please do the same ( proof ) when posting your disagreements cause some of us are here to learn not veiw an agument ok?
mcandles100 1 year ago
to believe anything other than what the bible tells us.I hope that the non believers see and hear this things soon for thier sakes.I hope I have made some sense to someone and im sorry if I have mis spelled somethings.God Bless All Of You.
mikehall2221 1 year ago
So the unbeliever really has the most to loose if you look at it from that stand point.I dont want to see anyone go to hell to suffer horribly.Not even the ones that dont believe and make fun of us that do believe.We will all have to wait and find out.Like I said us believers have nothing to loose.The reason we believe goes past even the words of the Bible.We have excepirenced God in our lives.We have witnessed things and heard things that support what we have witnessed that wont allow us to
mikehall2221 1 year ago
I believe In Jesus and God also all is wonders and power.If you dont want to believe it is your business really.The truth is laid out before us all.The way I look at it is Ive got nothing to loose by believing in God.If were right about him and his words are true,which I believe they are,then we go to heaven.If were wrong so what then we die and become nothing but worm food.The un believer has something to loose.If were right, and we believe we are, than you unblievers will go to hell.
mikehall2221 1 year ago
The grand canyon was NOT created in a great flood 4 thousand years ago. Suggesting it was just proves how completely ignorant you are.
hoppetoppe 2 years ago
If you are right, can you explain where the delta is? How did the river flow uphill to carve out the canyon? How come when Mount Helen's erupted it formed a structure comparable to the Grand Canyon in all but size (it's twenty times smaller, but still big) in a matter of hours? If it can happen once in history, why do you assume it never happened before? And I ask again... how could the river flow uphill?
thessalonian71 1 year ago
@thessalonian71 he says a River can not flow up hill so it had to be the flood cause rivers cant flow up hill review the clip you see moere each time ;)
mcandles100 1 year ago
Comment removed
mcandles100 1 year ago
@hoppetoppe prove it wasnt .. He gave evidence so if you'd like to debate it show your facts ok? fighting or arguing doesnt help in an intelectual conversation in fact its anoying showing nothng but ingnorance hoppetoppe
mcandles100 1 year ago
I am just digging this series!!! Do you have the rest of them? I am trying to find part 7... Thanks so much for posting it!
truthbeknowen 2 years ago 2
This is his current subject in his seminars. Part 7 will be out later tonight most likely and part 8 this time next week etc.
deimos760 2 years ago
Amazing info pastor Billy !! Great video again !! So much evidence and still people who don't want to believe it .... sad.
krisv001 2 years ago 11
You have summed it up right there krisv001. You believe Pastor Billy because you WANT to believe him. It is also why you see his laughable attempts at scientific explanations....and by 'laughable' I mean to 99.9% of scientists themselves.... as 'so much evidence'.
I mean to hold that view you must have to actively avoid non-christian science sources in case they ruin your perspective don't you?
noelplum99 2 years ago
NO that is not what I said ... read it again plse, what I said is that despite all the evidence people still won't believe that the worldwide flood of Noah was a real historical event.
krisv001 2 years ago
Open your eyes. the reason people don't want to believe the evidence for a Noahic flood is because for every sliver of evidence for the flood the evidence against it is a thousand times stronger. You think historians and scientists are all idiots and you have some indsight over their disciplines that they do not?
noelplum99 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How can all todays canines descend from just two in that way? To believe that, and given the minimal genetic diverstiry tied up in a single breeding pair, YOU must believe in the power of evolution to a much greater degree that any biologist. The only reason we can breed so many varied dogs is because the wolves they descend from have huge genetic diversity built up from millions of years of mutations. Tell me, oh great Pastor, where your dogs' genetic diversity is coming from?
noelplum99 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
27:26 Had to laugh at 'horrible storms'.
A horrible storm is three or four inches of rainfall an hour. Double that amount and things get really serious. At about 12 inches of rainfall an hour you are experiencing rain about as heavy as we have on record..ever!
This 'horrible storm' is about 30+FEET of water PER HOUR every hour for 40 days! No modern boat would survive ten minutes, let alone a wooden boat larger that any that has ever been built to be seaworthy witrhout extensive metal bracing.
noelplum99 2 years ago
Amazingly passionate rhetoric. It is such a tragic waste of human effort and talent that so much energies are invested in propping up mythological hogwash. There was no worldwide flood and there is no evidence for a worldwide flood. The only way you get away with your arguments is by appealing to people who are almost totally scientifically illiterate.
noelplum99 2 years ago
noelplum99 - you might want to get on the internet & google the world wide flood as there are many different countries whose histories point to a flood in their area that killed all the people. Science doesn't really have naything to do with it. if you can't prove that God doesn't exist by using science or evolution, then you can't ask to prove Him with science or evolution. But history HAS proven it. I'll take history over science.
kamicka23 2 years ago 2
I'm not asking to prove God, we are talking about the historical and scientific accuracy of a worldwide flood - not a local flood, but a worldwide one that covered all the land. now ofc many cultures have a flood myth, as they have a sea monster myth and a winged beast myth and a god myth (none of which you accept other than your own ofc).
Secondly, given that the judaic story is taken from the babylonian story is it any wonder it concords.
Anyway, as a lover of history perhaps you should.....
noelplum99 2 years ago
....check out the terrible historical consequences of incorporating the babylonian story of noah into the torah. Incorporate someone elses myth and someone elses deity into your own and the cracks will show. Please, watch my video 'From Noah to Abraham' if you have the time and let me know your response/thoughts.
noelplum99 2 years ago
noelplum99 - I am talking about proof of a world wide flood.If there are so many cultures who speak of a flood that correspond exactly with the Genesis acc't. They even have close to the same spelling of the name. In Job 40 & 41 - it speaks of creatures who have scales so strong that a spear is as a dart & a one whose tail is like a cedar tree. The dead Sea scrolls back up these historic moments. They didn't have videos to capture it & it was very important to pass on correct & true info.
kamicka23 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't understand. Why wouldn't the dead sea scrolls back up what is in the tanakh? The scrolls date from no earlier than about 200BC long long after the story of the flood formed part of the torah.
The big problem for you is that their are historical relics that pre-date the flood that would have been wiped out by it. We have cave paintings tens of thousands of years old; egyptian mummys' up to 6000 years old; dendochronological records in germany and US extending, unbroken, over 8000 years.
noelplum99 2 years ago
noelplum99 - You don't understand because you don't want to understand. Have you googled any info to show that many cultures have the same exact story of a world wide flood? You believe ancient drawings, but you won't believe ancient writings? Why? Because the ancient writings we're discussing have to do with believing in God. If you believe in the flood, then you have to accept the belief in God, but because you refuse to believe in God,you dispute the flood,even with proof from other cultures
kamicka23 2 years ago 2
Just one very simple question: how on earth do you think these people who had no idea whatsoever what the shape or extent of the world was had any grounds whatsoever to assert that anything was 'worldwide'??
Secondly, why do YOU not believe in thier Gods? Why do you REFUSE to accept their Gods given that you accept these babylonian stories to be true and thereby accept that THEIR deities caused the floods??
You have hijacked another cultures story and are claiming it for Yahweh!
noelplum99 2 years ago
Of the evidence I have read, there seems to be much support for a localised flood, possibly around the Euphrates.
however, you are asking me to throw away science almost entirely. If the flood story is true then science simply does not work and we should just abandon the scientific method. geology is useless; biology is broken; physics is useless; archaeology is unfounded; dendochronology is erroneous; engineering is baseless... i could go on and on. Your flood story breaks every single....
noelplum99 2 years ago
....scientific advancement we have made and casts doubt on all our endeavours. by all means you have your flood, go on believing in it. however, be consistent and never ever trust science again because if science can be so utterly wrong over this then science is junk, worthless junk.
PS: If you really don't understand WHY this is science-breaking then i can understand why you still accept the flood. however, for fuller explanations this would have to go to pm.
noelplum99 2 years ago
@noelplum99 - then let's go to pm - there is not enough room in here to properly answer questions & situations. I don't believe in their gods because most of their gods are stone gods that can't do anything for me. Their stone gods didn't create the earth or the universe & most of their beliefs had them sacrificing their children to fire to appease their god so tha they can have reain & sun & moon everyday. my God doesn't require that of me. Please pm me & let's discuss this more. Thanks.
kamicka23 2 years ago
well, I'm not going to pm you just for the sake of it kamicka. My call to pm was simply if you wanted clarification on any of the claims on the impact of science i was making, because i am acutely aware these are claims I have made here without backing them up.
Just one point:
Your elevation of yahweh is unfair. His status as the time the books of the torah were written was no different from that of other deities worshipped in the area - sophistication only followed after so, please, feel...
noelplum99 2 years ago
...free to worship Shamash, Ahura Mazda, or Ba'al (or his father El) and elevate their stature in the same way your predecessors have with Yahweh (none of these gods are 'stone gods' btw)
noelplum99 2 years ago
God once again prophecy when he said this about you " in the end times people would follow doctrine tought by demons".
Dawitness11 2 years ago 3
@Dawtiness
What a pathetic trick that is to avoid considering another's arguments. If you want to cover your eyes and ears and pretend that other opinions don't exist then at least have the intellectual honesty to admit that is what you are doing rather than just attributing any opinions that challenge your own as belonging to the devil.
Pathetic.
noelplum99 2 years ago
no I know about other opinions, but they are all wrong. all wrong. are u agnostic?
Dawitness11 2 years ago
No, i am an atheist.
noelplum99 2 years ago
how terrible for you!
Dawitness11 2 years ago
noelplum99 - But I guess if the Hebrews/Israeli's/Jews had drawn pictures like the Egyptians instead of using real language (sign of intelligence), maybe people would've believed the flood instead of disputing it.
kamicka23 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Maths may say the ark is feasible but engineering does not.
noelplum99 2 years ago
Interesting!! I've heard of a few expeditions and supposed photos of Noah's Ark, but I've never heard of historical accounts of the ark still existing during past times!! Great vid. Pastor Billy!!
God bless!!
5/5!!
eclipsesonic 2 years ago 3