Added: 2 years ago
From: Americagov
Views: 4,039
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ice Bear. NOT POLAR BEAR. 2 Different animals!

  • The poles are not going to completely melt even if the temp goes up 3 degrees C (like GISP shows happened 3300 years ago as it didnt melt then). The poles are so cold on average even a 10 degree C increase would never put the average above freezing, keep in mind it is not 20 degrees F during the winter on the poles it is in the -50 degree F range. Even in July the temp is between MINUS 10 C and +10 C

  • The other fact is as the earth warms it puts more moisture into the air which falls as snow at the poles. A warming earth creates more snow at the poles not flooding as it removes moisture sending it to the poles. Now will there be a little more melting 2 or 3 months of the year yes but the whole thing melting? NO not even in 1000 years, Al Gore is doing drugs.

  • Inspiring!!

    Check out "Blame Canada - the Climate Change Edition" & "Sweet Home Alberta - for Stephen Harper - Climate Criminal" from the Planet First * People First rally in Toronto on Dec. 12, 2009.

    2 songs on Youtube about the Canadian governments shameful role in Climate Change.

    At saramarlowemusic.

    Peace!

  • I went to go and see the Bear in the Square in London today, it was really awesome and when we went back at night the lights shining round it were really adding affect =3

  • Was that the skeleton of the Climategate beast? That little girl was lucky the Polar Bear didn't munch her.

  • freaking propaganda

    warming is a big fraud

  • When I saw the people touching the sculpture and the effect that had on it, I thought, "overpopulation." Is the problems of overpopulation and how it effects climate change being discussed at COP15 and if not, why not?

  • Vostok, Antartica:

    According to Barnola et al. (1991) and Petit et al. (1999) these measurements indicate that, at the beginning of the deglaciations, the CO2 increase either was in phase or lagged by less than ~1000 years with respect to the Antarctic temperature, whereas it clearly lagged behind the temperature at the onset of the glaciations.

    Temperature rise, then CO2 rise with a lag.

    Temperature fall, then CO2 fall with a lag.

  • Here is a problem..........Polar bear numbers have tripled and the polar ice caps aren't melting.

  • Thanks for the comment! What's your opinion on the multiple space/satellite/infrared scans of the polar ice caps since the 70s that show a MASSIVE regression?

  • LET'S AGREE ON THINGS BECAUSE IT'S A CONCENSUS AND THE EMAILS DON'T MATTER!

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Moron...

  • Aw man! Just when the discussion was going in the right direction!

  • Comment removed

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more