Stunning. Maybe you could change the title tho? as others have said this is a representation of 1000 armed Buddha of Compassion, not the also magnificent Shiva the destroyer
additional information about these performers... they are dumb and deaf...imagine that...i am not bluffing, it came out of china TV programme..and yea, they are all china chinese, this is Guan yin and not Shiva again...
this performance is absolutely out of this world! Imagine if they used effects like this to make a newer version of the Ramayana or Mahabharata!!!...i can't wait untill they do :)
Its just amazing and stunning. Its so beautiful to see how much you could do with our hands and that too very beautifully. I would like to buy this whole video if its available. Any one if you know where it is available please leave a comment about it here.Thanks.
Wow, by the way, Shiva is a "men" (male deity I mean) in Indian mythology, so It can't be Shiva. It's really beautiful and I can't believe what humans can do for the passion of religion senses... Thanks for posting
Not really. Gwaan Yin or Guan Yin (Sanskrit: Avalokiteshvara, Japanese: Kannon) is, according to Buddhists, a Bodhisattva, an "enlightened being" who rather than attaining moksha or nirvana for themselves, willingly remains in the cycle of death and rebirth in order to aid others in reaching Buddhahood. Not the ultimate Godhead or Brahman in which Shaivites conceive Shiva to be. StarSpawn06 is, I'm afraid, incorrect.
Guan Yin (観音) is not a Chinese interpretation of Shiva, but simply the Chinese name for the Indian Buddhist deity Avalokiteshvara. They have multiple arms and heads in common, yes (although in Chinese and Japanese art Guan Yin is depicted as having just two arms as often as not), but then many, many Indian gods do. So once again, no, this is not Shiva.
but again all the buddhists diety are ancient hindu deities with same or different names..like maar in buddhism is kamadeva of hindus..indra etc. r same. Avlokiteshvara is again a name of shiva(avlokit+ishwara), so basically it is shiva.Buddha himself is a reincarnation of vishnu for hindus.
Buddhism does indeed incorporate a number of Vedic deities into it's pantheon (Indra as Shakra, Brahma, etc.), but these are largely minor deities in a Buddhist context, and not objects of worship. Shiva is often referred to as "Ishvara" (as is Krishna, the Buddha, and other figures), but Ishvara by no means exclusively means Shiva-- moreover, Shiva is never known as Avalokiteshvara. You really can't say that all Buddhist deities are simply taken from Hinduism.
Brother Buddhism and Hinduism differ in the philosophy and nothing else.I hope that you know that as per Buddhism nothing is permanent ultimately its a Shunya,but as per the Advaitva or any other school of Hindus there is only one thing that is permanent.so i hope you get it "Nothing compared to the absolute one thing"Lord Siddhartha was a Hindu,so Buddhism could not propound any new deities, and moreover as per Gautam Bhudda there are no deities or God,it only the nothingness
I understand the philosophical difference between Śunyata and Brahman, brother. Regardless, it's a stretch to say there's "nothing" different about Hinduism and Buddhism save metaphysics, as there are numerous differences in practices and deities worshiped.
Also, I wouldn't say Gotama was a Hindu in the modern sense. True he *may* have been raised in a Vedic/Upanişadic tradition (although one authority on early Buddhism, Richard Gombrich, argues that he lived outside the Brahmin cultural sphere), but that fact that he utterly rejected the Atman/Brahman schema of the Upanişads with his Anatman doctrine makes anything but a Hindu.
It's Tsyen Shou Gwaan Yin ( "gwaan yin with a thousand hands" )
when the Chinese first saw a statue of Shiva, they thought were confused by its androgynous features and made up a female divinity called Boddhisativa Gwaan Shr Yin / Gwoon Sei Yem.
"Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." J. Robert Oppenheimer
AudioAndroid 5 months ago
Wasn't this done by a group of deaf people too?
thecrazedmd 1 year ago
oh my god amazing
mataronasd 1 year ago
Amazinggggg
Greenacres88 2 years ago
Stunning. Maybe you could change the title tho? as others have said this is a representation of 1000 armed Buddha of Compassion, not the also magnificent Shiva the destroyer
AnandaBlatt 2 years ago
indeed! this is one of the forms of kwan yin.
Quocviet1 2 years ago
*****
VegaEtereo 2 years ago
Get the god's name right.. it's not Shiva.
dionysius33 2 years ago 3
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
clap clap clap clap
the24stones 2 years ago 2
wow! thats all i can say
kandita7 2 years ago
Lovely to watch
rmsundaram1948 3 years ago 2
jaki synchron! przepiękne:)
xSolLx 3 years ago
NO! This is not Shiva! It is Chinese dancers for the 1000 handed guanyin!
smurkledunk 3 years ago 2
I AM AMAZED SHOCKED AND AT FIRST I COULD NT BELIEVE THESE ARE ACTUAL HUMANS.. no no not to over exagurate but honestly they are mind blowing.
santhiyarishi 3 years ago 2
om!
jqmont 3 years ago
awesome!!!
angellstar 3 years ago
This is not Shiva, but the Thousand-Hand Bodhittsava.
AnaMariaMeldelen 3 years ago
this is beautiful truly amazing
Seek Truth
particleion 3 years ago
This is pure art. thank you
waneelicious 3 years ago
additional information about these performers... they are dumb and deaf...imagine that...i am not bluffing, it came out of china TV programme..and yea, they are all china chinese, this is Guan yin and not Shiva again...
squareflat 3 years ago
increible
walterlandon1 4 years ago
Lovely to watch
BiwiNumber1 4 years ago
that was glorious
tisalew 4 years ago
satyam shivam sundram
xpirate009 4 years ago
Amazing... where is the other part. Thanks for uploading.
314159265352 4 years ago
this performance is absolutely out of this world! Imagine if they used effects like this to make a newer version of the Ramayana or Mahabharata!!!...i can't wait untill they do :)
prettydesidoll 4 years ago 3
Its just amazing and stunning. Its so beautiful to see how much you could do with our hands and that too very beautifully. I would like to buy this whole video if its available. Any one if you know where it is available please leave a comment about it here.Thanks.
dancethesky 4 years ago
BREATHTAKING!
konstantinno1 4 years ago
Wow, by the way, Shiva is a "men" (male deity I mean) in Indian mythology, so It can't be Shiva. It's really beautiful and I can't believe what humans can do for the passion of religion senses... Thanks for posting
LughLongArm 4 years ago
Wow so beautiful. Quite interesting and very well made with good Music... Thanks
prashantsehgal 4 years ago
Very Beautiful
LunaRosaoriginal 5 years ago
Gorgeous
Thanks
Sonia from Brazil
Soniarmb 5 years ago
that was brilliant!
telestupid 5 years ago
well it's not 1 to 1.
To me, Lord Er Lang's 3rd eye n trident make him more like Shiva than Gwaan Yin is.
Let's jus say they r incarnations of the same God -.^
StarSpawn06 5 years ago
pouco lindo não!
:D
Namastê!
adrianasabrina 5 years ago
That sheds a bit more light on it - thanks! So it actually is Shiva, but a Buddhist representation of it, right?
cbuddha 5 years ago
Not really. Gwaan Yin or Guan Yin (Sanskrit: Avalokiteshvara, Japanese: Kannon) is, according to Buddhists, a Bodhisattva, an "enlightened being" who rather than attaining moksha or nirvana for themselves, willingly remains in the cycle of death and rebirth in order to aid others in reaching Buddhahood. Not the ultimate Godhead or Brahman in which Shaivites conceive Shiva to be. StarSpawn06 is, I'm afraid, incorrect.
NeoEllis 4 years ago
Guan Yin (観音) is not a Chinese interpretation of Shiva, but simply the Chinese name for the Indian Buddhist deity Avalokiteshvara. They have multiple arms and heads in common, yes (although in Chinese and Japanese art Guan Yin is depicted as having just two arms as often as not), but then many, many Indian gods do. So once again, no, this is not Shiva.
NeoEllis 4 years ago 2
but again all the buddhists diety are ancient hindu deities with same or different names..like maar in buddhism is kamadeva of hindus..indra etc. r same. Avlokiteshvara is again a name of shiva(avlokit+ishwara), so basically it is shiva.Buddha himself is a reincarnation of vishnu for hindus.
ankurcity 3 years ago
Again, no.
Buddhism does indeed incorporate a number of Vedic deities into it's pantheon (Indra as Shakra, Brahma, etc.), but these are largely minor deities in a Buddhist context, and not objects of worship. Shiva is often referred to as "Ishvara" (as is Krishna, the Buddha, and other figures), but Ishvara by no means exclusively means Shiva-- moreover, Shiva is never known as Avalokiteshvara. You really can't say that all Buddhist deities are simply taken from Hinduism.
NeoEllis 3 years ago
Brother Buddhism and Hinduism differ in the philosophy and nothing else.I hope that you know that as per Buddhism nothing is permanent ultimately its a Shunya,but as per the Advaitva or any other school of Hindus there is only one thing that is permanent.so i hope you get it "Nothing compared to the absolute one thing"Lord Siddhartha was a Hindu,so Buddhism could not propound any new deities, and moreover as per Gautam Bhudda there are no deities or God,it only the nothingness
NFah43Bk 3 years ago
I understand the philosophical difference between Śunyata and Brahman, brother. Regardless, it's a stretch to say there's "nothing" different about Hinduism and Buddhism save metaphysics, as there are numerous differences in practices and deities worshiped.
NeoEllis 3 years ago
Also, I wouldn't say Gotama was a Hindu in the modern sense. True he *may* have been raised in a Vedic/Upanişadic tradition (although one authority on early Buddhism, Richard Gombrich, argues that he lived outside the Brahmin cultural sphere), but that fact that he utterly rejected the Atman/Brahman schema of the Upanişads with his Anatman doctrine makes anything but a Hindu.
NeoEllis 3 years ago
It's Tsyen Shou Gwaan Yin ( "gwaan yin with a thousand hands" )
when the Chinese first saw a statue of Shiva, they thought were confused by its androgynous features and made up a female divinity called Boddhisativa Gwaan Shr Yin / Gwoon Sei Yem.
StarSpawn06 5 years ago
That was absolutey beautifal. I was privlaged to see that. Wow. The persision! And fluidity!
Clairona 5 years ago
that was hard
TheApex5 5 years ago
Thanks for the details and the correction. The only reference I could find this clip described it as "Shiva Synchronized."
cbuddha 5 years ago
This has nothing to do with Shiva - it is the Buddha of One Thousand Arms dance, performed by deaf dancers.
Vierotchka 5 years ago
Also known as Buddha of One Thousand Hands (Buddha of Compassion)
See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ug0KNmxyyD8 for details about these performers.
Vierotchka 5 years ago