Evolution of the Nose

[harvellt]

And stop using Einstein as a call to authority, he was wrong about stuff. He was brilliant, but he hated the idea of quantum physics.

[harvellt]

Whats the point of ripping apart a specific book from the 60s?

[OccultistPriest]

First of i doubt you actually read that book,.. you probably only looked at the pictures,.. we didn't come from gorillas,. or monkeys,.. they are distant cousins of ours, we have a common ancestors, they evolved as we did to conform to there surroundings,

i don't know, you make me scratch my head, you made this video in response to a video that even dumbs down evolution so a novice 3 year old could understand it and yet Urgh,.. and people wonder why i think Christians are dumb

[KnowJesusKnowPeace]

I read the entire book. Ask yourself, 'Why did I have to reject what is said with a false argument?'

[rchodges]

1965? So, any chance you have a book from this century regarding this material?

[KnowJesusKnowPeace]

It makes no sense to knock the printing date of the material. Darwin's work is from the 1850's.

[rchodges]

I'm only pointing out that more modern textbooks don't print this material. I had a biology book about a year ago; and there was no reference to this material.

This has a similar feel to refuting a biology textbook by saying that "Heckler's Embryos" are fake.  The scientific concept of evolution continues to be honed and sharpened as the understanding of the world clarifies.

I appreciate the point you are making, but you should be showing current material if you wish to contend it.

[KnowJesusKnowPeace]

The point of this video is that pro-evolutionists dogmatically thrust evolutionary theory as fact. Yet, as we can see, a lot of it is just "pop science". Truth is, the majority of scientists are furious over publications that thrust weeks-old ideas into the general population without peer review. This sets science back about 50 years each time. The incorrect knowledge has to be refuted many times before people change their understanding.

[atchisrj1]

In the humanities, one finds theories whose subject matter does not (only) concern empirical data, but rather ideas. Such theories are in the realm of philosophical theories as contrasted with scientific theories. A philosophical theory is not necessarily scientifically testable through experiment.

[AndrewRGilbert]

You have to be kidding me, dude... Your video is a huge misrepresentation of evolution... You honestly have no idea how stupid you sound to educated people, do you? I've studied evolution, you obviously haven't... That is GLARINGLY obvious. I am laughing so hard right now...

[wolfman49er]

I don't think that this guy could be more wrong. Evolution is not a guess....that assertion is just maddeningly incorrect.

[Split539]

Is this guy purposefully misleading, willfully ignorant, or just criminally stupid.

[LadroneScar]

@Split539 D) All of the above.

[teksalot]

At least atheists take the time to read the bible. Have any of you actually taken the time to really, truly study evolution? Probably not or you wouldn't be misrepresenting it. I'll bet this guy never read the book, he only read the captions on the pictures and hasn't bothered to realize how dumb he sounds.

[KnowJesusKnowPeace]

I read the entire book. In 1965, other lateral movers of information, such as yourself, also dogmatically asserted what is printed in that book. Much of what is printed there as "law", is changed today, yet still called law.

[Markmark91]

So it's okay to disregard a theory with actual evidence and love your little creation delusion with absolutely no empirical evidence. Actual empirical evidence > delusion

[s0merand0midi0t]

HAHA great great great grandpa shark

[shedendpussys]

well all you need to know is that because its published by the The Rockefeller University who are one of the main familys involved with the mystery schools, their belief foundation is that fish people from the siruis star system and the reptillian race from alpha draconis created or 'seeded' life on planet earth. This is partly why we are told this.

[imyoursuperior2]

lol, what some people won't believe just so they won't have to answer for their actions.

[krazeekooladam]

?????????

[STARNPRODUCTIONS]

who on God's great planet would try to back up the absurdity of that book and evolutionary crap. its an abomination to the complex soul that only man possesses, given only to man by a God so poorly comprehended due to his incomprehensible and sheer awesomeness. praise Jesus, he is revealed to those who want to seek him and hidden from the children of wickedness.

[krazeekooladam]

The Rockefeller University? Well that explains it. Of course the Rockefellers would fund this anti-Christ agenda.

Hey KnowJesusKnowPeace, I am sorry for getting sidetracked, this is not related at all, but there is something I noticed. The first video to be related to this one, if you look off to the rightside under this video, is a video called BOOGERS IN MY NOSE, by youtube user mrpregnant. LOL...oh my :) how did this happen? :)

[STARNPRODUCTIONS]

the Lord's people are angels; while satan's children are animals and do not know divine purposes from the Lord when they see it. we are given kingship over the specimens of the world, and God has given us this purpose to reign over them, and not to be ranked as one of them who have no soul to be possessed by God.

[acfacf4321]

Starnprod-- what the hell are you talking about?? You realize this is 2009, right?

[STARNPRODUCTIONS]

let me rephrase my comment though if it seems harsh. those who do not know Jesus are not merely animals, but just that their beautiful soul given only by God has not opened up to his touch, as i remember loved ones who have not continued in answering his call to them.