Added: 4 years ago
From: karelkenvijf
Views: 62,181
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (184)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @2000abdulali u are talking bout hazaras who left from 13th mongolian empire..

  • Best leaders of all time

    1. Napoleon Bonaparte

    2. Genghis Khan

    3. Alexander the Great

  • @dylanthecanuck there are so many great leaders(specially genghis khan)..Why u think napoleon is greatest? What made him greatest? what is the honour ? what he did ? u must be french that's why...Genghis khan is the man of the millienium.

  • genghis khan >>>>> alexander the great >>> chinese Han wudi >> caesar the great

  • "Now my DNA's in dudes from New York to Japan"

  • khan WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A MURDEROUS, RAPIST PIECE OF SHIT THAT IS SPENDING ETERNITY HOWLING IN HELL WHERE TRASH LIKE HIM BELONGS. ANYONE WHO ADMIRES GARBAGE LIKE khan ARE NOTHING MORE THAN STUPID DIRT BAGS

  • @1IIIIIIIIII1

    I agree its like admiring Hitler.

    The Mongols ran out of weapons & many staved to death Thats why the retreated.

    no sense in arguing over what happened 800 years ago

  • @2000abdulali The pathans in pakistan, are more the descendents of turksih/iranians and some are mongol. But majority of pathans have turkish blood, you can even tell by looking at their faces. Very few pathans have mongol/chinese/asian features.

  • Cingiz khan When he invade Harazem he had 200 thousand army of mongols and Tatars. 20 thousand kyrgizs and 10 thousand uyghurs to back up the conquest. So it was more like Muslim Turks Vs non Muslim Turks. In his first conquest to the west mongols already became minority in the army. What western people saw was not a pure mongol horde. It is more Turkic.

  • Cengiz Han was just leader,his father and his father in-law were famaous and well respected.He was practicing TURKISH religion-SAMANISM (eskimos too) , that is why many christian, arab and muslim fundamentalists don't like him.In central asia he united all TURKISH tribes and made empires'official language TURKISH.Cengiz Han traced his roots to SHATO TURKS who were the builders of GOKTURK empire Mengu Tengri Icun-in the name of God his letter starts and was sent to POPE.Real TURKS love CENGIZ Han

  • @AtillaCengizTimur what the fuck are u talking about ? r u dreaming? he was not fucking Turk.Also, that's not samanism ...correct word is Shamanism which is religion of mongol and turk other nomadic ethnicty.

  • @temuujinable It is a shame that in 21st century u do not do research.In mongolia there are Orhun stones,writings about Kul Tigin,Bilge Kagan,Tonyukuk.Those stones 1278 years old,on those stones u will not see the world mongol but u will see TURK.Kokturk empire is the first one with word TURK.Mongols are a small Turkish tribe,mongols descendants of KokTURKS and Uygurs.Today mongolia has 2 mill.pop.Mongolia has traditional TURKISH capital OTUKEN.Communists forbided mongols to learn mongol history

  • @AtillaCengizTimur first of all, i guess you dont know history much..mongolian researchers already found those things that u r talking so many years ago..All mongolians know about those things and i saw those things.In time of Huns , there were so many tribes nomadics in euroasia which is very big land..these are ancestor of mongol ,kazakh ,turk , uzbek ,uygurs etc...only thing is that was many years ago and these nomadic became tribes separately according life style and place where they live

  • @AtillaCengizTimur we are not just 2 million dude. there are many mongolians in china(inner mongolia and mongols of blue lake) Also,there are mongolians who is hazara in afghanistan and pakistan . Tuva mongols,buryatia mongol,halimag mongols in russia...Second,In time of mongol empire , so many mongolians are left to live and they mixed with another nation in another place...that's why there are 2.8 million people in mongolia...Get it.

  • @AtillaCengizTimur bilge kagan -bileg khan (King bileg) kokturk-huh turk (blue turk)......these are actually mongolia words...true words are changed in another language...Because cant spell correctly

  • @temuujinable It is not another language,all the Turks use same words,they are common.Cengiz Han traced his roots back to Shato TURKS who were the founders of the KOKTURK empire.Stop disrespecting the claims,tellings of Cengiz Han.If Cengiz Han said that he is a SHATO TURK that is it,so be it ! Who are you to question his words,I am sure that Cengiz Han knew his own family background better than you.I am also glad to see that you love Cengiz Han,what else mongolians have currently to proud of ?

  • @AtillaCengizTimur did ghenghis khan say that he is shato turk??? lol ...that means obama is turk..right?..Also,there were 2 kind of people..one is turkic people and another one is people who speaks turkish language and related to turk's cultural ...In that time,some mongols used to speaks turkish language too..anyway we are related to history

  • @temuujinable U live in the USA,u r trying desperately to be accepted by Americans,u r also trying to deal with racism and with feeling of being a second class minority in USA.For u only way to feel good is to talk about Cengiz Han,and disrespect,attack others.probably your family brought to USA by Christian missionaries,possibly u already sold out,changed your religion to christianity,and your name Henry,Harry etc just like Chniese do .I feel sorry for u,best wishes to mongolians !

  • @AtillaCengizTimur i suggest you search it on google .. then learn history

  • @AtillaCengizTimur fuck you! mongolia is small turkish tribe? fuck you. fuck you very very very much.

    fucking turkish dog bark at the MOON. don't be jealous on one's success.

    Mongol history is fully rich, greater than turkish histoy. it's all.

  • It is Mongol custom that the youngest son (firekeeping "Otgon") should inherit his father's land, to guard the hearth as the firekeeper. The youngest son is Tolui. Khalkh Mongolians are descendants of Tolui guarding the fire in the ger of Genghis Khan. We are the true inheriters of Chingis Khaan.

  • @2000abdulali Not Pathans! Haha! You mean the Hazara!

  • Genghis khan was God.

    It's funny how Chinese claim him.

    It's funny how Muslims claim him.

    It's funny how Turks claim him.

    It's funny how Mongolians claim him.

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! He was a barbaric individual who didn't give a fuck about your pathetic cultures or fake religions. He fucked you all!

  • @2000abdulali Haha. First they conquered the world, then they became Muslim and then their empire fell! Haha.

    Most Mongols became Buddhists and Chrsitians though. Pakistan has nothing to do with Mongols LOL.

  • @MaIcoImZieI who became muslim????? what u talking about? every greatest empire fell. That is the unwritten theory...Mongolian empire stayed long time .Learn history ..

  • Genghis Khan jumped more trees then edward cohen :(

  • In my opinion, he's just lucky to be born at that time, cuz there's not a strong china like " han-dynasty" at that time, or "tang-dynasty" . If he was born in " han" or " tang", he will die ugly. I sure !!!! One man killed lots of ppls to become a hero ??!!! I don't like him !!

  • @croas2011

    well is not about killing people,he was born into a tough life with his father poisoned and his tribe betrayed his family.all he had was his family and together,with a handful of poor nomads,they managed to DESTROY all the greatest nations in the world at that time:china,russia,muslim countries,fell one by one

    conquering the biggest land empire in history with the poor uneducated background is pretty impressive,he didnt simply bully weaker nations like british did

  • @ulongkoror

    which countries he didn't bully??? could you tell me??? I really don't know !!!! : )

  • @croas2011

    he conquered everything from china to poland,largest land empire in history

  • @ulongkoror

    yeah, he did it .but which countries he didn't bully??? it seems that you didn't answer my question !!!

  • @ulongkoror uneducated background????? i suggest u read GENGHIS KHAN AND THE MAKING OF THE MODERN WORLD BY JACK WEATHERFORD.  how can organize largest empire without intellenge , tactique, skill...Then what's the education in 13th century ? tell me ? u need to educate for yourself.

  • @croas2011very very very poor opinion ...u cant define and change the history with few stupid words ...history is history ..Hey stupid ...He counquered half of the world. not just a fucking china...u r bug which is billion billion(maybe no limit) times weaker than him...world knows him...who knows you?

  • i love his empire..his style n would have been happy if was born during his age under his rule at Mongolia

  • You wanna watch a great movie about Genghis Khan? Rent "Mongol". A great film with breathtaking cinematography and excellent acting.

  • He is the most important factor for moderating today`s world. On that time Europeans were been in dark age. if without the Mongol empire, western technological improvement would delay at least 200 years. If western moderation delayed 2 centuries we would live in industrial age.

  • Genghis Khan should have heeded the advise of Shakespeare and use his defeated enemies with mercy instead of that savage cruelty: "We would have all such offenders so cut off; and we give express charge, that in our marches through the country, there be nothing compell'd from the villages, nothing taken but paid for, none of the French upbraided or abused in disdainful language; for when lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner."

  • I think it is difficult to label the great Mongol warlord as the greatest warrior and so on in history unlike Napoleon, Caesar or Alexander (though his end resembles that of Alexander, as he too was undefeated and planning new wars, when called off the global stage) he might just not simply not have met his Wellington, Bluecher, bad weather or survived his mistakes, while others perished; Fortune is inconstant but sometimes favoured a single man, though this luck is always treacherous...

  • @GreatGrumbledook u know what??????he saved every person who agreed mongolians. His army includes many foreigners who is intellingent. powerful, topest ... the only thing is that he knew how to kill and how to respect... by the way Genghis khan > Shakespeare

  • @temuujinable: [for Greatgrumbledook] That is hard to tell since both reign in their spheres most absolute, the one in poetry the other in warfare; and the king is more dependant on the poet than the poet on the king: Because if the poets do not compose poems, plays and epics about the kings and their deeds they will be very soon be forgotten and that is almost as if they never had done their deeds. So always be nice to the poets and pay them large sums of gold so that they will praise you.

  • CENGIZ HAN they where 5 of them !!

  • I admire adore and look up to Genghis.

  • Genghis Khan, however his name may be spelled or whatever his ethnicity consisted of, was just the baddest dude ever! Greater than Cyrus and Darius (although I love Persian history), a more brilliant strategist than Alexander, and - quite ironically - more tolerant than the Christian and Islamic empires ever dreamed of being. Anybody that doesn't respect him doesn't know squat about history.

  • Couldn't agree more.

  • Yep. If one was a modern day military field commander, one would be stupid NOT to study the man and the tactics of Genghis/Chinggis himself.

    His conquering ways may be viewed as barbaric, but he was an empire builder.. unlike Attila who was a conquering thug.

  • I agree

  • @JonChristopher999 I don't know if the Mongols were the most tolerant. What about the Abbasids and the Umayyad dynasties? They were so successful because of their level of tolerance.

  • @JonChristopher999 Badder than Hitler?

  • dude wat is wrong with u?

    he ushered in a golden age! the greatest empire the world has ever seen, with the most stable economy EVER, he founded the great silk road(not the chinese), and provided total religious freedom for EVERY religion, call him a conqueror, watever, but a pig!?!?! not even

  • It's Chinggis Khaan To Native Mongolians And Russians But Is Pronounced Genghis Khan For Westerners

  • u got it wrong my man , the acknowledgement of Genghis Khan is not to celebrate any slaughter , but is to recognize the individual brilliance of a single person his tactical genuis and his achievements .. don't u think the person who has built the biggest empire in the history of humanity should be acknowledged?? ( it is a reply to kinh9999)

  • Chinngis Khan is real name is Temujin. When he became the King of Mongolia, his name changed to Chinngis Khan.

  • His name in Mongolian would sound more like Chinngis Haan, Khan means Lord, and Ghenis/chinngis means Ocean, he was refering to the Steppe as being a sea of grass. However you want to pronounce his name, he was one incredibly hard man.

  • u mean he was always hard ha ha ha

  • guys, chinks from china claimed that mongolia should be part of china too. they said mongolian r chinese too. watch?v=x9QNKB34cJo

  • Mongolians r not chinese. When Mongolian baby burn they have blue spot in their lower back. But Chinese New burn babies dont have it. Some Korean and Japanese babies have it. There is no way Mongolians are Chinese.

  • What do you mean "when baby burn"? You don't mean putting a baby in the incinerator, do you? Chinese and Mongolians are two different people, alright.

  • ramones you dam fool chingis is how they pronounced it,a nd it was first spelt in the early 17th century, when the first critical arguments of genghis came out

  • Try the 1100's by Mongolian historians and Marco Polo. However they pronounced it, the proper spelling is Genghis Khan, which isn't even his name, it's his title, it means Great Leader.

  • Chinggis Khaan is one and only !

  • YES! I agree. Genghis Khan is the one and only!!!

  • you guys don't know the real secret behind g.khan's success. there was a white warrior by the name of tom cruise who introduced g.khan to military strategy and thus g.khan's success in world conquest! Thus, tom cruise from w.europe was the LAST KHAN!

  • it is funny to have white genghis khan. Ha Ha!!!! Shame on hollywood

  • Mongolian damage so much Asian n European civilization and establish nothing. Shame on u.

  • @mybox65 suggested to read ghenghiskhan and the making of the modern world by jack weatherford..get educated and learn history ....Shame on u

  • Gengihs Khan was a mongolian. You Moran Brain Washed Jerk

  • hey idiot

    listen to what your saying

    "according to hollwood"

    yea aisan historys dont go with hollywood

    and no genghis khan is not white

    and you better stop calling us chinks before you get shot by your local asian mafias

    damn idiot

  • Hey whoever you are. If you know nothing about history, just keep your mouth shut!!

  • I see the number of 12 year olds on youtube isn't going down yet. Sigh.

  • That was a cute baby.

  • aight, lemme clear this out.

    Huns are the origins of Mongol which during the fall of Hun Empire a small number of group traveled far to Hungaria, which later had the king named Atilla.

    Kazakhs were the small tribe in forest, Chinggis Khan sent one of his general to conquer, but he got captured. After that, he sent one of his best knights, that's how Mongolia got Kazakhs. Don't pretend like Chinggis was Kazakhs. End of Discussion

  • Atilla's reign was about 500years before Genghis Khans

  • @marshallferron but their ancestor which is hun is same

  • This is outstanding!!! You've just insulted entire turkic world in which Kazaks are the core nation. Do you know that name Kazak was obtained by several tribes who separated from Abulhair khan?

  • 1428

    Abulkhair's Khanate (the state of Uzbek nomads) included lands lying to the East of the Nogay Horde: from the river of Yaik (Ural) in the West to the lake of Balkhash in the East and from the Aral Sea and the lower reaches of the Syrdaria in the South to mid-reaches of the Tobol and the Irtysh in the North.

  • Those tribes leading by two sultans Kerei and Dzhanibek went to Mogolistan to ask a shelter from khan Abylhair. In Mogolistan major and ruling tribe was Dulat (now consist in Kazak nation in grater Zhyz-hord) and they provided asked shelter because they were interested in alliance with so called KAZAKS (in turkic language means independent)

  • That is how KAZAK nation was created, but before we were turkic speaking nomads who conquered territorry from pacific ocean to baltic sea and biggest role in that played ancestors of modern KAZAKS

  • talker1975 are you a KAZAK? I'm a Turkmen from Turkiye. If you are a Kazak, we are a brothers. Because Kazaks are Turkic, all Turkish peoples be brother. Longlive Turanian Brotherhood!

  • heb je de reportage zelf ook?

  • korea only rule themself after raped by japan.they are all loser in last 5000 year.haha

  • I am of the great-grand sons of Cengiz Khan, the Turkish Ruler of Mongols.mongols are distant cousins of Turks and Huns. the foundation of Turkish army is B.C.209,by Mete Khan of Hun Empire. notice they are both called Khans

  • goood approach

  • yoo rules north-china 916~1125

    kum rules north-china 1100∼1223

    Yuan (mongol-Genghis Khan) rules china 1271∼1360

    cheong(kum) rules china  1636∼1912

    japenes rules north & east china 1915~45

    Yuan (mongol-Genghis Khan) rules china 1271∼1360

    cheong(kum) rules china 1636∼1912

    japenes rules north & east china 1915~45

  • um u do know china (han ) can go invade other "nations" right but they didn't throughout their dynasties. they believed invasion is a bad thing but as we can see from other empires in the past it shouldn't be looked down upon. gotta thanks the manchurians (qing) for invading mongolia and tibet and xingiang for us though and still having it today. :/

  • true china-history lesson

    baedalkook(korea )rules china 3000bc -2333bc

    ancient-Joseon(korea) rules china 2333bc- 1122bc

    gweonwong (TiBet-Mongol)rules west-china 770bc-722bc

    xiongnu(Mongol) rules north-china 600bc-10bc

    sunbi rules china 100-400

    turkey rules north-china 400-750

    su,tang (sunbi) rules china 500-907

    * su- Dynasty is NO-china history or tabg- Dynasty is no-china history

  • lmao, dude, go out do something relate to the real life

  • ok ok let's get this straight. genghis khan had red hair?? who told you that? he was asian, 100% mongol. Asians have dark hair.

  • The ultimate soldier and leader who could organise rabil into the most powerful army in the world.

  • hmm i knew he conquered a lot of lands but that I didnt know he conquered more than that Alexander the greek fag.. haha. Thats cool.

  • BBC does sometimes do impressive works of documents ... almost as complete as planet earth on discovery

  • They did an awesome job on this documentary about Genghis Khan! They coulda made a movie with it lol.

  • LOL, it is a movie!

  • great genghis khan . and great mongolia .

    we still love genghis khan . i am not mongolian i am from Afghanistan. but i love mongolian people .

  • I wish i could see the whole thing, we are studying genghis khan for world history

  • i would like to say to everyone who has posted a comment; CHILL.

  • i like mongolian script it is designed to be be written on horse

  • his tribe was borjigon mongol

  • I saw this show on the Discovery Channel once and damn is it SWEEEEEEET!!!!!!

  • Genghis Khan fucks Jesus and Muhammad in their arse! Haha! Fuck Christian and Muslim faggots. Genghis Khan is my real hero. He was a real man. Dirty faggot motherfuckers, one day his spirit will rise again and punish you dirty faggots for all your lies and deceit. Fuck you all!

    HAIL THE GREAT KHAN!

  • Very well said!

  • ya ok buddy

  • this message is for malcolmziel:you need a good b--w job.

  • Genghis Kahn didnt hate Jesus man.. dont make things up. But hey Genghis Kahn was the man.

  • Hw could he hate fiction? The Khans were real, Jesus was a made up magician.

  • HAHAHAHA LOL!!

  • LOL, damn right. Genghis Khan wouldn't have time to deal with such fairy tales.

  • dude. Temmujin created a nation which had religious freedom for all religions. He was a great man indeed, but seriously, can the biggoted garbage, treat others with the respect The Great Khan did!

    P.S. Temmujin's adopted father was a christian. Many of his allies were muslim. I am christian. Show some respect

  • Why Genghis known by most westerners as barbaric. Without brain (system, strat and tactic) the great Mongols would never conquer and rule nearly half of te world more than a century. Can U? (the feeling great nation) do this on his own.....without.UN or lazy Crabs...? Hope the decendent which flows the blood of bloody Great Genghis unite to fight the think worrior and police of the world.....like Mongols which also broke.

  • According to many guys, Chingis khaan was Russian, Chinise, Turk, Japan, Korean, Ukranian, Manchurian, Vietnam and so on. Hahahahaha!!! All are true???

  • ??

    What do you mean? I'm only saying he had red hair. Red hair is very common amongst Tatars, Kirgiz, Kazak and Mongols. That's what he was Tatar/Kazak/Kirgiz/Mongol.

  • A lot of people think only White People have red haired people amongst them. Actually Tatar and Kazak have much higher rate of red haired people amongst them.

  • no, are you kidding me?

  • According to other first hand accounts recorded by al-Din, from sources as widespread as Marco Polo to Zhao Hong, Genghis's family was noted in particular for its propensity in producing various shades of red hair. Rashid al-Din also described the first meeting of Genghis and Kublai Khan, when Genghis was shocked to find Kublai had not inherited his red hair.

  • Muslim historian Rashid al-Din, foremost contemporary historian on Genghis Khan, recorded in his "Chronicles" that Genghis was tall, long-bearded, red-haired, and green-eyed.

  • indeed, or north-west china

  • (1) Ik wil graag bevestigen dat er van oudsher met de geschiedenis wordt geknoeid. Onze versie is niet zomaar de juiste, maar om die van de Russen dan zomaar aan te nemen is zeker niet beter. Is het ooit bij u opgekomen dat de Russen er belang bij hadden om de veroveringen van de Mongolen kleiner voor te stellen?

  • (2) Anders zouden zij immers als nazaten van die bloeddorstige barbaren gelden! Een mens zou voor minder de geschiedenis herschrijven. Trouwens, de Romanovs - en de Russen in het algemeen - hadden zoals elk 'verlicht' vorstenhuis een sterke neiging tot manipulatie van de geschiedenis.

  • (3) Het zijn toch ook de Sovjets die 'bewezen' dat in de Holocaust hoop en al 80 000 mensen stierven? Heel wat anders dan de miljonen die in het westen worden beschreven.

  • (4) Kortom: Ik kan er zeer ver in meegaan dat de geschiedenis die hier in het westen wordt onderwezen vaak van de historische paden afwijkt, maar ik wil u ten stelligste aanraden om dan niet de dichtstbijzijnde (en meestal ook de spectaculairste) tegengeschiedenis als waarheid te aanvaarden. Zoals altijd het geval is, zal de waarheid dus ongetwijfeld wel ergens in het midden liggen.

  • Om te zeggen dat Dzjengis Khan het grootste rijk ooit bestaan heeft veroverd, is inderdaad historisch niet correct. Het waren zijn opvolgers die het rijk die legendarische omvang gaven. Het is aannemelijk dat het rijk van Dzjengis Khan bij zijn dood ongeveer de helft of drie vierde van die definitieve uitbreiding bedroeg.

  • Om te zeggen dat Dzjengis Khan nooit bestaan heeft, is niet echt weloverwogen: zijn kleinzoon Kubilai startte een nieuwe dynastie in China, en andere nakomelingen zetten grote Khanaten verder in Centraal-Azië en dichter naar Europa. Uit deze Khanaten groeiden andere grote rijken, zoals dat van Timur (basis te Samarkand).

    > dit alles kan moeilijk voortkomen uit een volslagen losbol annex dorpsidioot, zoals u Timoedjin afschildert.

  • Ook het bestaan van de 'geheime geschiedenis der mongolen' wijst zeer duidelijk in die richting. En die is bezwaarlijk door een romanov uit de duim gezogen.

  • anyone wanna know genghis meanining-it is meaning deniz(sea) point great-also attilas son denhgsik(meaning sea same also mean owner of seas)-in today in modern turkish the word meaning same deniz(sea also great)

  • big turan leader-

  • This Kazakh determined the wheel of history

  • he was mongolian you shit head kazak. i have encountered kazaks like you, who wish chingiz was kazak, he isnt he is a mongol go fuck yourself.

  • Kazaks weren't even a people until the 15th century, 2 centuries after Genghis Khan's rise. Just because Genghis Khan was a Mongol doesn't mean he can't be a hero to Kazaks though. We are all Altaics anyway.

  • Plastikglass watch your mouth. What do you mean "they weren't even people"? Are chinese provocative element? Like Min qol, Kazakhs were political-military union which later became a name of the nation. What a big deal? It is common process and many nations passed through that

  • Which part of him was mongolian? At that time word "Mongol" even didn't exist. But word "Min qol" in Kazakh means thousand of hands which make sense because Turkic Nomads divided army on thousand then on hundred then on tenth. It is not a secret that Mongol (Min qol) was a political-military union of certain TURKIC tribes such as KEREI, DZHALAIR, NAIMAN, KONGIRAT, SIRGELI and so on.

  • i have alot of respect for kazaks, they are a proud people to be a part of and the ones who i have met never doubted for a second that chingiz khan was mongolian, how ever it seems to me once i come online you people turn into flag waving shit heads. you are kazak, and say that chingiz khan was kazak himself this makes your arguemnt entirely fallable and bias. the fact is history knows him as mongol, historians much more reliable than you or me accept him as a mongolian.

  • *contined* and btw of course chingiz khan united turkic tribes! everyone he conquered became apart of the horde, but it started as a purely mongolian army, and chingiz khan himself was mongolian, all history accepts him as this, you cant argue against that because of your blind nationalism.

  • Did you carefully read my comment? Or you just ignored it because of lack of saying? This was pure Russian and Chinese propaganda, which is never worked in Turkic world. In order to distroy TURAN Russians and Chinese gave all glory some tungustic tribe now mistakenly called MONGOL. We perfectly know our history and culture. It is imposible hide or distort

  • HAHAHA! DUMB ASS!!

  • One more thing, it is not a secret that Genghis (Shingyz) Khan's mother was from tribe Konirat and his wife Borte was from tribe Zhalair. Both of this tribes are consist of Kazakh ethnic, Konirat from Orta zhuz (middle horde) and Zhalair from Uly zhuz (Grand hord). But his origin nowadays is blurred but there are so many indisputable evidence that he was from one of nowadays Kazakh tribes. Even name Shingyz of Turkic origin and common among Kazakhs, how can you argue with that.

  • chingiz khan was from the borjigin clan, what on earth are you talking about? listen dude, all of credible history and all of its historians agree undisputably that chingiz khan was mongol, and that he united mongol tribes, which later on after conquest of the kwazarmian empire. it included tribes like kazak, uighur and other turkic warriors. even most of your fellow kazaks agree that he is mongolian, and are proud of his heritage none the less!

  • As I mentioned before there was no Mongols before Genghis khan and this label was created by himself. Dude, I have no intentions to argue with you cause I see your level of history knowlege. How can you call Kazaks as a tribe, this means you know nothing about Eurasian history. Take care, live in peace

  • what do you mean there were no mongols before?! of course there were, they have been divided among many tribes, but your nationalism aggravates me, you are kazak yourself this is the only reason you claim chingiz khan to be kazak, because of your blind nationalism in a desparate grasp for something to be a proud of, sorry to break it to you dude, chingiz khan maybe a huge part of kazak history, but he is not yours to claim as your own.

  • Kazaks always claim that the tribes of Merkit, Zhailar, and Naiman were not Mongolian, but what do those words mean in Kazak? The truth is those words are Mongolian and have the same meaning now as they used to back then. The Turkic tribes of Eastern Altai were different from the ones on the western side.

  • YOU're right. MAN!

  • I like how he says it was wrong for me to say there were no Kazaks during Genghis Khan's time, but he can say there were no Mongols before Genghis Khan's time. :)

  • Kazaks didn't exist before th 15th century just like how Mongols didn't exist before the 13th century. Of course people existed, but they weren't called Kazaks or Mongols, which proves all this claiming on Genghis Khan is BS. We are all Altaics anyway, for the umpteenth time. Genghis Khan would be disappointed in how we squabble over such useless shit, divided and weak.

  • Also, have you asked yourself, which tribe Genghis Khan was from?

  • for the last fucking time BORJIGIN TRIBE!!!!!! god damn.

  • That was a clan, his tribe was Mongol. Mongol was a tribe just like Kerait, Naiman, Merkit, Onggirat, etc. After he united all the Altaic tribes, he named them all under his own tribe.

  • I don't understand why you get all angry over Kazaks saying Genghis Khan was Kazak. It may be wrong historically, but not racially. Kazaks and Mongols today are the same race and look extremely similar compared to other Asian countries. So while Genghis Khan was the same race as us Mongols and Kazaks, his tribe was Mongol and we just happen to use the same name for our country, big deal.

  • victory!!!

  • Today's Mongolians are getting stupid, they go far as to say Genghis Khan was Khalkha. Being an Oirat Mongol, what am I supposed to say to that? I would also be like a Kazak and get pissed. Genghis Khan's tribe Mongol was relative to his time, very different from the Kazaks and Mongols today. But he was an Altaic, and so are all of us.

  • hey! have you read the secret history of mongolia.

    first read that book and then say waht you want! think about what did you say.

    mongolia is khalkha!

  • Khalkha is a very stupid term and used by exclusionists like you. The truth is Khalkha was made up in the 18th century to designate the Mongol "barrier" troops who sided with the Manchu against the Western Oirats. Khalkha itself has nothing to do with the times of Genghis Khan.

  • HAHAHA! YOU ARE AN IDIOT!

    MONGOLIANS had had a long history prior to CHINGGIS KHAAN.

  • yeah, a history of getting their butts kicked by the Chinese. Temmujin united them for the first time in history and lead them on their first succesful campaign outside their own borders.

    btw, GENGHIS KHAN, not Chinggis Khaan, who's the idiot? Study first then talk.

  • Hey there :)

    First of all Genhkis Khan is a turkish(Mongol) tribal leader in central asia. In Turkey there are ppl that have split eyes. related from him just liek. Look at our soccer star Ilhan Mansiz.go search him and look at him. Genkis Khan = Turkish(Cengiz Kral)

  • No, Temmujin was a Mongol, a distinctive people from Mongolia, a nation northeast of China. Okinawans look Chinese, but try calling them that, they'll kick your butt! They are their own people, just as the Mongolians were their own people.

    also, his title was GENGHIS KHAN, which means Great Leader in MONGOLIAN, a language which did not exist in written form until Temmujin created an alphabet for them.

  • Has it ever occurred to you that there are other languages on the globe outside English? Every language has its own way of writing 'Genghis Khan', in Dutch for example it is 'Dzjengis'. So open up your world before you bring your blind unilateral opinion here. Thank you.

  • Whoa, hold up a sec, Genghis Khan is Mongolian, not english. Even if I moved to Germany or Russia, my name would still be Chris, even if a different spelling and pronunciation was prevelant in that country, Genghis Khan is his name, wether you are Mongolian, Chinese or French! I was simply pointing out that the person I commented on was calling someone else an idiot, and did not even spell his name correctly!

  • You are very, very wrong.

    You seem to forget other systems of writing... President Putin of Russia is Putin in English, but Poetin in Dutch, just as well as Genghis is written differently in other languages and script types than the original. Chris for example, could be sth like 'kris' in greek.

  • naaa u americans call it genghis khan while in other europian countries it is chingis khan .. more fairer one would be the last ,, but who cares they are all refering to a single person

  • @begegemot Cingiz, or Cengiz either one is correct. Kirgiz,kazak,mongols,Uzbek TURKS pronuce it as cingiz Turkmen,azeri, Turks from balkans and Turkey pronunce it as Cengiz. For example in Kazakistan an oil field named TENGIZ to honor Cengiz Han. A lot words with same meaning but with different pronuncation they all correct.Temucin,timucin,timur,­demir,teymur all has same meaning means IRON timujin,temirci,demirci means IRONSMITH his father was a sword maker Cengiz,Tengiz: vast,edless,biggest

  • Chinggis Khaan, not GENGHIS KHAN. first you should study then talk. BULLSHIT!!!

  • Dude, Temujin WROTE the Mongol language, before him it was only a verbal language, and HE spelled his TITLE, GENGHIS KHAN, meaning The Great Leader, I have studied Genghis Khan, in fact, I have TAUGHT on Genghis Khan!

  • I'm Mongolian. I know that his name is Chinggis.

    Genghis it is wrong pronounsation.