With ATM development , the systems are just to effective against MBT. Missiles are just blowing them to peices. Like plastic toy. I have to witness one to make sure its blowing up MBT and not a fake , cardboard,plastic replica. Your best in fast moving IFV with the lates ATM systems.put on a AA heat seeker on top.
Not all Americans are biased towards our own military hardware. I recognize fully that the CV90 series of vehicles offers best-in-class performance. They aren't cheap, however. Bradleys cost between 1.5 to 3 million USD each, while CV90s are closer to 3.6 to 5 million USD per vehicle. That's a hefty price to pay for an IFV, but they've certainly proven these things to be effective in Afghanistan. It's like a fine sports car. Not everyone can afford one, even if they'd like to have one.
@Spartan043 true, however mobility is a key issue, that's why neither Norway, Sweden or Finland has bought neither the Bradley nor the Abrams, since they both broke down in harsh winter conditions. During my time of service in the Swedish military, we got to ride the Cv90 through a storm in 9 feet of snow and ice. Still it was able to plough through almost 30 km through that in mountainous terrain and -32°c. Reliability that the vehicle doesn't brake is a key fact. Otherwise we would have died
@Zangizo it's an IFV, it combines the characteristics of MBT and APC.. it doesn't have the armour and firepower of a tank and it can't carry as much troops as an APC, but it can do both.. it goes to a fight alongside MBT's, followed by APC's..
With ATM development , the systems are just to effective against MBT. Missiles are just blowing them to peices. Like plastic toy. I have to witness one to make sure its blowing up MBT and not a fake , cardboard,plastic replica. Your best in fast moving IFV with the lates ATM systems.put on a AA heat seeker on top.
TheManfromNibiru 1 year ago
Not all Americans are biased towards our own military hardware. I recognize fully that the CV90 series of vehicles offers best-in-class performance. They aren't cheap, however. Bradleys cost between 1.5 to 3 million USD each, while CV90s are closer to 3.6 to 5 million USD per vehicle. That's a hefty price to pay for an IFV, but they've certainly proven these things to be effective in Afghanistan. It's like a fine sports car. Not everyone can afford one, even if they'd like to have one.
Spartan043 1 year ago 7
@Spartan043 true, however mobility is a key issue, that's why neither Norway, Sweden or Finland has bought neither the Bradley nor the Abrams, since they both broke down in harsh winter conditions. During my time of service in the Swedish military, we got to ride the Cv90 through a storm in 9 feet of snow and ice. Still it was able to plough through almost 30 km through that in mountainous terrain and -32°c. Reliability that the vehicle doesn't brake is a key fact. Otherwise we would have died
wellerocks 1 year ago 3
Would beat the bradley anyday that's for sure!
lundholm4 1 year ago
What a n00b. This looks and is more modern than anything american.
nomorefooling 3 years ago 11
@nomorefooling what lul? this can protect up to 14.5 mm rounds (bit larger then the 50 cal) and has a 40mm cannon. bradley
The standard american tank is the Abrams M1A1 A.I.M. - It can protect from up to 130mm round's and fires a 120mm cannon.
It is also one of the fastest tracked vehicles on the market.
Tehpolev 1 year ago
@Tehpolev
Agree? BUT, It's not on "the market".
mozgokacat 11 months ago
@Tehpolev This isn't a tank, this is an APC. Why are you even comparing a main battle tank to an APC?
Zangizo 9 months ago
@Zangizo it's an IFV, it combines the characteristics of MBT and APC.. it doesn't have the armour and firepower of a tank and it can't carry as much troops as an APC, but it can do both.. it goes to a fight alongside MBT's, followed by APC's..
tibchy144 8 months ago
@tibchy144 Very well, IFV, but still :P
Zangizo 8 months ago
CV90 family Vehicles are in service within:
Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Netherlands and Switzerland... more to come!
SgtDrDeath 3 years ago
i can only agree opn that since i am in service in denmark and we have the leopard and the CV90:D
hanersigselv 4 years ago
Germany should have bought the CV90 instead of the Puma witch sucks bad...
SgtDrDeath 4 years ago 7
Sweden and Germany makes the best fighting vehicles in the world...
From a Norwegian...
SCANIA TURBO POWER!!!! AND DAIMLER BENZ v12!
Cozorax 4 years ago 19
för att alla skrivbordskrigare inte kan ett skit om krig
panzerkitsune 4 years ago 2
what the hell do you know about war?
hanersigselv 4 years ago
kan någon berätta varför dom helt plötsligt la ner det här projektet, det verkade ju fungera riktigt bra
Rallyniklas 4 years ago
that things fuking sweet
pbman9213 5 years ago 2