This still brings tears to my eyes and ive watched this more than once, and i'm a 42 year old man! My dad died in 1991, i really hope that one day when its my turn to go i will meet my dad in heaven and we will greet eachother just like that!
Thank you very much. There was one version of this film done in black and white,which i can't find. The b&w is real strong in the beginning. Great movie.
I hope i never become so cynical with life, that i can`t watch the railway platform scene, without welling up inside. The look in Jenny Agutter`s eye`s are spell-binding.
@MrValiant61 This was listed as one of the top ten most tear-jeking films of all time - quite appropriate that there's a 'Robert Cryer' in the credits at the end!
have to say i prefer this version to the newer version. its a brilliant film. i loved it as a child and now even at 19 i still love it. its a classic film. x
I have watched the entire show and must say this can't be topped by the live performance I just saw in Toronto. Thank you for posting such a delightful family show.
@unlikeanyotherhuman Weaker parents are also to blame these days for allowing their kids to walk all over them thus becoming spoilt self obsessed/absorbed kids. I think its because parents drink more these days and kids can atually be more in touch with reality than them so obviously for them its not healthy. Your mum and dad are supposed to be responsible, and maybe wait till they move till they become smack heads.
@unlikeanyotherhuman How is this our world a harsh world. I think that is a little bit over the top... But Im with you I myself am a good caring person and got emotional when she screamed daddy oh daddy! I agree more people are raised badly from these days, but there's hope for them!!
It's been a very long time since I read the book and then I found this beautiful, charming, movie, I loved it to bits. It took me back to a place very far away from 2011. The platform scene at the end, "Daddy, my daddy" dear god show me a dad who loves his daughter, who could possibly resist shedding a tear (even a sneaked one)
My Grandparents lived directly opposite Oxenhope Railway station on the Keighley and Worth Valley Railway. This film is and always has been a favourit I was five years old when this was filmed and I can't watch it without shedding a tear at the end . This film is Timeless always will be
My Grandparents lived directly opposite Oxenhope Railway station on the Keighley and Worth Valley Railway. This film is and always has been a favourit I was five years old when this was filmed and I can't watch it without shedding a tear at the end . This filmis Timeless always will be
weird thing happens at 7:05, look at the tree's in the right of the scene above the cobbled wall, it seems like the branch breaks off and runs along the grass.. or maybe it's predator...
I think Ribblehead would've been a good place to have filmed this. The book mentions there being a viaduct, yet neither this film or the 2000 version have one, so they could've used the Ribblehead Vidauct - and Blea Moor Tunnel!
@Mickolboy1 I wonder if Bobbie knew subconsciously that her father was coming home and went down to the station for that reason? The book seemed to suggest that.
This is where the 2000 version is closer to the book:
1. Peter gets the engine for his birthday instead of for Christmas.
2. The children get to meet the Station Master as well as Perks.
3. The Station Master, rather than Bobbie and Phyllis, catches Peter taking the coal.
4. Peter's engine is repaired by a relative of the fireman's rather than by Perks. (Peter shares it with Bobbie as her birthday present and she later takes it down to the station to ask the driver if he can fix it.)
@googlygeek Personally, I slightly prefer the 2000 version, for these reasons:
1. Overall, the 2000 version seems closer to the book.
2. Although the mother refers to having to 'play at being poor for a bit', in this version they still look quite well off after moving away, whereas in the 2000 version they do actually look quite poor - they're always wearing the same (and much more basic) clothes.
3. The setting - I think Horsted Keynes is a much bigger and better station than Oakworth.
4. I only just realised this today, but I think the actor who plays the father in the 2000 version has a much more friendly-looking face - I can't help thinking that in this version he looks a bit gruff.
So although this is a very good film and I certainly don't knock it, I think the 2000 version slightly edges it. Maybe the fact that there was someone who appeared in both films might have something to do with them at least being comparable to each other!
oh man, on every Christmas in the 70s. Event television eh. Most of the kids I know nowadays would never sit down and watch a film like that, that long, all the way through. Being nice to each other just ain't trendy anymore.
@unlikeanyotherhuman I couldn't agree more - the world we live in today, and the norms that people adopt today are anything but wholesome. The family is under attack, and that's what we need to make our #1 priority.
@irongiant20012001 yeah? And what if families fail to protect their children? They failed on a big scale, I'd say - a families strenght comes from within. I have had enough experience of that sort. I think the form of family that you are thinking of does exist in dreams . That is okay, if you are aware of it.
@irongiant20012001 Oh nonsense. When this film was made Daily Mail readers were whining about permissive society and the end of "traditional values" as they had done for a hundred years before then. Don't get fooled into the idea of a departed idyll that never existed; we have it pretty good, kids are more protected now than they ever were by the oppressive silence of a society where abuse was concealed for fear of "making a fuss". "Daddy" was a socialist locked up for trying to make a change
it was in the top 100 tear jearking moments on channel 4,a lovely moment when daugter and father are reunited.bet it would bring a tear to most peoples eyes
@mrmister102 Yeah. In the introduction to the 2000 version Jenny Agutter says that Edith Nesbit's father died when she was four, and so feels that the return of a father in this story is so significant. Nesbit knew what it was like to be without a father, so she could imagine how the children must have felt.
@stevelaker According to The Railway Magazine it's actually been extended to January 2 because it's been so popular! Just as well, because I haven't had a chance to see it!
@mammasbabas I think it's a branch that was stuck there in a rather feeble attempt to hide the very 20th century factory behind. Presumably it wasn't put there sufficiently securely, or someone got tired of holding it up.
I'd be interested to know what happened afterwards - did they carry on living in that house or did they go back to London? Did the father get his job back? Did they eventually tell Peter and Phyllis why he'd been away? If so, how did they take it?
Thinking about it, maybe they'd come to like living near the railway so much that they decided to stay there! Perhaps they might have been able to live a bit more comfortably once the father came back, but other than that they probably carried on as they were.
Now the Waterburys are my idea of a happy family. The way people spoke in those days (particularly those of my age) was much more polite. I expect it was also considered more appropriate for strangers to be friendly and chatty, for instance on the buses - I'm from the South of England where people keep themselves to themselves if they don't know each other. Wouldn't it be grand if people today were so committed to looking out for everybody?
I haven't seen the 2000 version of Railway Children, but this version is simply charming. I've watched it several times now and haven't yet tired of it. What a perfect world they inhabit.
Well, I'd certainly recommend it! One difference is that whereas this version goes straight from Bobbie telling Peter and Phyllis to get help to Jim being carried out of the tunnel, the 2000 film has a bit more in between.
I've now watched both films fairly thoroughly, and I've come to realise that they both have bits cut out of them, but the bits that aren't in one are in the other so they more or less cancel each other out in this respect.
I still think I prefer the other one though - I like the style much better. Horsted Keynes is a much bigger station than Oakworth. Also, they look a lot poorer in that one as they're always wearing the same clothes - and the clothes are a lot more basic, as is the house.
I've just finished watching this film all the way through! Thanks for uploading it!
I saw the remake on TV on New Year's Day and I'm inclined to think that that's probably an exception to the tendency of remakes of classic films not being as good as the original.
In fact, the purists will probably hate me for saying this, but after having seen this version properly again, I think I'd even go as far to say that the remake is better!
I'm old-fashioned for an 18-year-old, though I do have some 21st Century views where it is necessary. I prefer to use a bit of oldies language frankly for the sake of bringing something different to my college. For instance, when something is good I like to say 'fab' or 'splendid' because I hear the words 'cool' and 'awesome' too often for my liking.
Hey whatever you are is fine, there is much to be said for the values we see in this film and i can see you might identify with it.
Anyway, ever since i were small i have loved this film, it never fails to make me cry as it has so much charm and value the likes of which so sadly lack today.
On the other hand, this 21st Century has almost achieved equality and chores are a lot easier due to technology, but the music (in my opinion) is false, shallow and soul-less with far too much attention to the glamour and dress sense, technology has practically taken over households so that families don't do nice things anymore, television has much improved special effects but none of the class it used to have.
@Ilovecats112233 I understand the point you're making entirely and you made it well, but I think that in a world where 1 in 4 women are raped in a lifetime (and indeed an 11 YEAR OLD girl was effectively blamed for being gangraped by 18 men in Texas recently) and I innocently scrolled down my Facebook feed to see an 18 year old boy leave a comment on a Chinese friend of mine's status calling him a "chinky queer c*nt" , I hardly think it's fair to say that we've almost achieved equality. Not yet.
There is good and bad in both the 20th and 21st Century. The 20th Century was a more innocent time when people were well-mannered and children would play outside like real children and families would sing and make decorations at Christmas, and the music was wonderful and it was actually the music itself that was valued, not the half-naked glamour. All this came at a price as there was much poverty, racism, sexism, homophobism, arranged marriages and even this country was dominated by religion.
One of the greatest films ever!
"Daddy, my daddy!" Oh!
Still brings tears to my eyes!
CutandPrintFilms 15 hours ago
I read the book and it was great but seeing it on screen is just AMAZING!!!
TNTbombbl 1 week ago
this movie is soo helpful... now i know how to make my script...
draina97 2 weeks ago
@irongiant20012001 thank u so much for posting this! i love u forever more
226halo 1 month ago
GReat film I love it, thank you ever so much for posting this!
youngLaraCroft 1 month ago
I got a english test bout this tomorrow :D
borborcarcar 1 month ago
Niiiice, had to read the book and I scrolled through the movie aswell for the area English competition thats tomorrow :D
OnceThereWasMusic 1 month ago
I always cry like a baby when I see this..
JaneandLana 1 month ago
From what I gather, I must be one of the few people who doesn't start crying at this!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 month ago in playlist The Railway Children (1970)
my papa always cries at this.
thicketwings05 1 month ago
Comment removed
morval99 2 months ago
Comment removed
morval99 2 months ago
Thank you so much for posting, I watched it this Christmas morning. It brought back lovely memories of watching it with my family as a child.
PinkElephantTV1 2 months ago
Such a feel-good film, many thanks!
StreetlySaviour 2 months ago
DAMN YOU YOUTUBE! It just started buffering as her Daddy appeared! This is an iconic scene, I love it so much.
NobodyTossesADwarf91 3 months ago
thankyou for posting this! i auditioning to be in the play tomorow lol. cant wait! i wanna be phil!
strawberrydream99 3 months ago
@strawberrydream99 Good luck!!
irongiant20012001 3 months ago
This still brings tears to my eyes and ive watched this more than once, and i'm a 42 year old man! My dad died in 1991, i really hope that one day when its my turn to go i will meet my dad in heaven and we will greet eachother just like that!
Loverboy19691 3 months ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
a very dear movie, if you like life.
daylightlover 4 months ago
lol "They'll have to marry now" I love how matter of fact it seems
CREN13Queen 4 months ago
wow i kill people for living i thought i had a heart of stone iv never cried in my life but when that scene ,daddy my daddy made me cry like a baby
britfree1 4 months ago
@britfree1 In the 2000 version even Bobbie started crying when they hugged each other!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 month ago
Thank you very much. There was one version of this film done in black and white,which i can't find. The b&w is real strong in the beginning. Great movie.
daylightlover 4 months ago
daddy my daddy! cue tears...
nicelydone31 5 months ago
It puzzles me as to why Phyllis is wearing such a heavy coat on what appears to be a fine day!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 5 months ago in playlist The Railway Children (1970)
"Hurry up, Fatty - for goodness' sake!"
"I can't - my bootlace is undone!"
"When you get married, your bootlace will come undone going up the aisle, and the man that you marry will tumble over and smash his nose in!"
"I'd rather marry a man with a smashed-in nose than not marry at all!"
Inkyminkyzizwoz 5 months ago in playlist The Railway Children (1970)
"They'll have to marry now."
WillJoeDoctorwhofans 6 months ago 5
One of the sweetest movies ive ever seen!
anjelita32 6 months ago
I hope i never become so cynical with life, that i can`t watch the railway platform scene, without welling up inside. The look in Jenny Agutter`s eye`s are spell-binding.
MrValiant61 6 months ago
@MrValiant61 This was listed as one of the top ten most tear-jeking films of all time - quite appropriate that there's a 'Robert Cryer' in the credits at the end!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 5 months ago in playlist The Railway Children (1970)
havent seen this since i was about 5. never cried so hard at a film, either...
LaRouxNo1 6 months ago
@unlikeanyotherhuman There will always be Godly, caring people, because God will always have a people that serve Him.
AlenaJolie 7 months ago
have to say i prefer this version to the newer version. its a brilliant film. i loved it as a child and now even at 19 i still love it. its a classic film. x
XRobin09X 8 months ago
I have watched the entire show and must say this can't be topped by the live performance I just saw in Toronto. Thank you for posting such a delightful family show.
alwestover 8 months ago
The Waterburys ought to consider a newspaper subscription.
luvtub 9 months ago
thank you so so much for this.. its just what i needed to watch, I miss my childhood today. what a beautiful film.
JINAYKHAN 9 months ago
Jenny Agutter was so good in this! Classic film! :)
BritishRailways60163 9 months ago
Thank you so much for uploading this movie. It was lovely.
marycatfish 10 months ago
Perks was awesome.
KangoTV 10 months ago
'Daddy , My daddy'... Still makes me cry... Beautiful art of work.. Classic.
luscious2468 10 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
As stated earlier:
I think there is a suspicion of indecency about the reunion scene.
It looked like tongues to me.
welshnick300365 10 months ago
@unlikeanyotherhuman Weaker parents are also to blame these days for allowing their kids to walk all over them thus becoming spoilt self obsessed/absorbed kids. I think its because parents drink more these days and kids can atually be more in touch with reality than them so obviously for them its not healthy. Your mum and dad are supposed to be responsible, and maybe wait till they move till they become smack heads.
LAMPARDIO 11 months ago
@unlikeanyotherhuman How is this our world a harsh world. I think that is a little bit over the top... But Im with you I myself am a good caring person and got emotional when she screamed daddy oh daddy! I agree more people are raised badly from these days, but there's hope for them!!
LAMPARDIO 11 months ago
Amazingly made film....
LAMPARDIO 11 months ago
I was number 50 to like this....sweeet :)
LAMPARDIO 11 months ago
brock IELP reading
abdull0431 11 months ago
Still makes me cry :)
CplElite 1 year ago
I LOVE THIS MOVIE ASWELL!
talulah123 1 year ago
Simply a fantastic part of all our childhoods, amazing really if u think about it how lucky we all were 2 have this event thanx.
shanie119 1 year ago
It's been a very long time since I read the book and then I found this beautiful, charming, movie, I loved it to bits. It took me back to a place very far away from 2011. The platform scene at the end, "Daddy, my daddy" dear god show me a dad who loves his daughter, who could possibly resist shedding a tear (even a sneaked one)
TheJohn3b 1 year ago
what a great movie! thank you!
dotcomguy79 1 year ago
Every bloody time, no matter how hard I try, when she says "Daddy, my daddy!" I well up like a big ol' baby :')
Browncoatt22 1 year ago
@unlikeanyotherhuman How true, indeed, how true!
nmpost7 1 year ago
what a charming movie. loved every minute of it! :)
krimskrams 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@unlikeanyotherhuman
My Grandparents lived directly opposite Oxenhope Railway station on the Keighley and Worth Valley Railway. This film is and always has been a favourit I was five years old when this was filmed and I can't watch it without shedding a tear at the end . This film is Timeless always will be
Gillyyorkie 1 year ago
@unlikeanyotherhuman
My Grandparents lived directly opposite Oxenhope Railway station on the Keighley and Worth Valley Railway. This film is and always has been a favourit I was five years old when this was filmed and I can't watch it without shedding a tear at the end . This filmis Timeless always will be
Gillyyorkie 1 year ago
weird thing happens at 7:05, look at the tree's in the right of the scene above the cobbled wall, it seems like the branch breaks off and runs along the grass.. or maybe it's predator...
guyascott 1 year ago 2
Oh dear god...that platform scene gets me every single time...
rockstar690 1 year ago
I think Ribblehead would've been a good place to have filmed this. The book mentions there being a viaduct, yet neither this film or the 2000 version have one, so they could've used the Ribblehead Vidauct - and Blea Moor Tunnel!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love this film so much!
thunderchild21 1 year ago
"Daddy, my daddy" can blow away anything on the screen, got tears even even writing this.
Mickolboy1 1 year ago 2
@Mickolboy1 I wonder if Bobbie knew subconsciously that her father was coming home and went down to the station for that reason? The book seemed to suggest that.
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
@Mickolboy1 yep, that's it exactly...
rockstar690 1 year ago
so beautifully emotional...
seekingatrialogue 1 year ago
This is where the 2000 version is closer to the book:
1. Peter gets the engine for his birthday instead of for Christmas.
2. The children get to meet the Station Master as well as Perks.
3. The Station Master, rather than Bobbie and Phyllis, catches Peter taking the coal.
4. Peter's engine is repaired by a relative of the fireman's rather than by Perks. (Peter shares it with Bobbie as her birthday present and she later takes it down to the station to ask the driver if he can fix it.)
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
@googlygeek Personally, I slightly prefer the 2000 version, for these reasons:
1. Overall, the 2000 version seems closer to the book.
2. Although the mother refers to having to 'play at being poor for a bit', in this version they still look quite well off after moving away, whereas in the 2000 version they do actually look quite poor - they're always wearing the same (and much more basic) clothes.
3. The setting - I think Horsted Keynes is a much bigger and better station than Oakworth.
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
4. I only just realised this today, but I think the actor who plays the father in the 2000 version has a much more friendly-looking face - I can't help thinking that in this version he looks a bit gruff.
So although this is a very good film and I certainly don't knock it, I think the 2000 version slightly edges it. Maybe the fact that there was someone who appeared in both films might have something to do with them at least being comparable to each other!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
oh man, on every Christmas in the 70s. Event television eh. Most of the kids I know nowadays would never sit down and watch a film like that, that long, all the way through. Being nice to each other just ain't trendy anymore.
BNCA70 1 year ago
@unlikeanyotherhuman I couldn't agree more - the world we live in today, and the norms that people adopt today are anything but wholesome. The family is under attack, and that's what we need to make our #1 priority.
irongiant20012001 1 year ago 11
@irongiant20012001 yeah? And what if families fail to protect their children? They failed on a big scale, I'd say - a families strenght comes from within. I have had enough experience of that sort. I think the form of family that you are thinking of does exist in dreams . That is okay, if you are aware of it.
Draculhuhn 1 year ago
@irongiant20012001 Oh nonsense. When this film was made Daily Mail readers were whining about permissive society and the end of "traditional values" as they had done for a hundred years before then. Don't get fooled into the idea of a departed idyll that never existed; we have it pretty good, kids are more protected now than they ever were by the oppressive silence of a society where abuse was concealed for fear of "making a fuss". "Daddy" was a socialist locked up for trying to make a change
Long23 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
NIETZSCHEAN14 4 months ago
I think there is a suspicion of indecency about the reunion scene.
It looked like tongues to me.
welshnick300365 1 year ago
beautifully acted. needless to say the station platform scene just leaves me in a mess. just so lovely!!!
QANTAS330 1 year ago
it was in the top 100 tear jearking moments on channel 4,a lovely moment when daugter and father are reunited.bet it would bring a tear to most peoples eyes
mrmister102 1 year ago
@mrmister102 Yeah. In the introduction to the 2000 version Jenny Agutter says that Edith Nesbit's father died when she was four, and so feels that the return of a father in this story is so significant. Nesbit knew what it was like to be without a father, so she could imagine how the children must have felt.
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
Comment removed
Helgabelle 1 year ago
Comment removed
Helgabelle 1 year ago
I cried like a three year old whose burst his balloon. Wonderful film.
matthewrcollins1 1 year ago 5
@matthewrcollins1 Your not the only one!
highfieldharry 1 year ago
"Daddy! My Daddy!" Never fails to choke me. We're going to see the adaptation at Waterloo Station next Saturday and can't wait!
stevelaker 1 year ago 4
@stevelaker According to The Railway Magazine it's actually been extended to January 2 because it's been so popular! Just as well, because I haven't had a chance to see it!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
I saw a production of this at Waterloo Station yesterday. If you love the film, you must go and see it. It's amazing!
museticalsuburbia 1 year ago
thanks for posting this - one of the best scenes in film. Perfect in fact. Metalbucket2 - yes, me too!
TheTintin185 1 year ago
The reunion scene between Roberta and her father is so emotional. It chokes me up every time I see it.
metalbucket2 1 year ago 2
What is that in the background, falling over the wall? About 7.01 upper right hand corner. It looks like chopped down branches but it disappears.
mammasbabas 1 year ago
@mammasbabas I think it's a branch that was stuck there in a rather feeble attempt to hide the very 20th century factory behind. Presumably it wasn't put there sufficiently securely, or someone got tired of holding it up.
matthewrcollins1 1 year ago
I'd be interested to know what happened afterwards - did they carry on living in that house or did they go back to London? Did the father get his job back? Did they eventually tell Peter and Phyllis why he'd been away? If so, how did they take it?
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
Thinking about it, maybe they'd come to like living near the railway so much that they decided to stay there! Perhaps they might have been able to live a bit more comfortably once the father came back, but other than that they probably carried on as they were.
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
My dream of a real family too so loving and open and caring
awesome movie...
evelutionofone 1 year ago
Now the Waterburys are my idea of a happy family. The way people spoke in those days (particularly those of my age) was much more polite. I expect it was also considered more appropriate for strangers to be friendly and chatty, for instance on the buses - I'm from the South of England where people keep themselves to themselves if they don't know each other. Wouldn't it be grand if people today were so committed to looking out for everybody?
Ilovecats112233 1 year ago 2
@Ilovecats112233 I wonder where they got the name 'Waterbury' from - the book doesn't actually mention their surname.
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
@Ilovecats112233 It would be a nicer to place to be..... wouldn,t it..........X
ricky070572 1 year ago
@Ilovecats112233 I couldn't agree more.
Thompsongs 1 year ago
I went to see a musical of this a few days ago and one particularly amusing bit was this:
Passenger: "Does this train stop at Dover?"
Perks: It's gonna be a bloody big splash if it doesn't!"
Inkyminkyzizwoz 2 years ago
I haven't seen the 2000 version of Railway Children, but this version is simply charming. I've watched it several times now and haven't yet tired of it. What a perfect world they inhabit.
pokeyoakey 2 years ago
Well, I'd certainly recommend it! One difference is that whereas this version goes straight from Bobbie telling Peter and Phyllis to get help to Jim being carried out of the tunnel, the 2000 film has a bit more in between.
Inkyminkyzizwoz 2 years ago
I've now watched both films fairly thoroughly, and I've come to realise that they both have bits cut out of them, but the bits that aren't in one are in the other so they more or less cancel each other out in this respect.
I still think I prefer the other one though - I like the style much better. Horsted Keynes is a much bigger station than Oakworth. Also, they look a lot poorer in that one as they're always wearing the same clothes - and the clothes are a lot more basic, as is the house.
Inkyminkyzizwoz 2 years ago
Another things that's interesting is this bit from the 2000 film:
Mother: "When you go down to the station you won't walk on the line, will you?"
Bobbie: "But didn't you ever walk on the railway lines when you were little?"
Mother: "Yes. Alright, then!"
Well, she DID walk on the lines when she was younger - when she played Bobbie in this film!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 2 years ago
@Inkyminkyzizwoz I wonder if that was an "in film" nod to the original. Be nice to think so...
rockstar690 1 year ago
@rockstar690 Actually, those lines are in fact in the book. Still, it's nevertheless pretty amazing!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 1 year ago
Daddy, my daddy!
simpsonmark 2 years ago
That's weird, the actor who played Jim was 20, name Christopher Witty and this was his last film role.......
MickeyLove01 2 years ago
I've just finished watching this film all the way through! Thanks for uploading it!
I saw the remake on TV on New Year's Day and I'm inclined to think that that's probably an exception to the tendency of remakes of classic films not being as good as the original.
In fact, the purists will probably hate me for saying this, but after having seen this version properly again, I think I'd even go as far to say that the remake is better!
Inkyminkyzizwoz 2 years ago 2
A good , old fashioned, proper film , no special effects or computer generated images like so many today ! Love it !
skylinetink44 2 years ago 3
I'm old-fashioned for an 18-year-old, though I do have some 21st Century views where it is necessary. I prefer to use a bit of oldies language frankly for the sake of bringing something different to my college. For instance, when something is good I like to say 'fab' or 'splendid' because I hear the words 'cool' and 'awesome' too often for my liking.
Ilovecats112233 2 years ago 3
Hey whatever you are is fine, there is much to be said for the values we see in this film and i can see you might identify with it.
Anyway, ever since i were small i have loved this film, it never fails to make me cry as it has so much charm and value the likes of which so sadly lack today.
moodyblue1964 2 years ago
On the other hand, this 21st Century has almost achieved equality and chores are a lot easier due to technology, but the music (in my opinion) is false, shallow and soul-less with far too much attention to the glamour and dress sense, technology has practically taken over households so that families don't do nice things anymore, television has much improved special effects but none of the class it used to have.
Ilovecats112233 2 years ago
@Ilovecats112233 I understand the point you're making entirely and you made it well, but I think that in a world where 1 in 4 women are raped in a lifetime (and indeed an 11 YEAR OLD girl was effectively blamed for being gangraped by 18 men in Texas recently) and I innocently scrolled down my Facebook feed to see an 18 year old boy leave a comment on a Chinese friend of mine's status calling him a "chinky queer c*nt" , I hardly think it's fair to say that we've almost achieved equality. Not yet.
charlievkismyqueen 3 months ago
There is good and bad in both the 20th and 21st Century. The 20th Century was a more innocent time when people were well-mannered and children would play outside like real children and families would sing and make decorations at Christmas, and the music was wonderful and it was actually the music itself that was valued, not the half-naked glamour. All this came at a price as there was much poverty, racism, sexism, homophobism, arranged marriages and even this country was dominated by religion.
Ilovecats112233 2 years ago 2
I like the way the foliage they've stuck on top of the wall to try and cover the modern farm in the background falls off at 7:04
stevemichaelsimmons 2 years ago 3
@stevemichaelsimmons,the times i watched this film,i never noticed that.Eagle eyes!!
blaster2012 2 years ago
An Amazing movie filled with authentic dignity and pure "charm". Thank you kindly for posting.
CPRCanadian 2 years ago 2
i do love this film thanks for uploading it
birdnoh 2 years ago 23