Mike Mozart is a genious - Ive been subbed to him longer then you, but i disgress. I love his Idea and if i had that usless junk Iphone, i would downrate every single mainstream movie i could find and give a responce on why it is horrible. Unfortunatly I dont. still doesnt stop me from going to Rottentomatoes though ;)
I do think he misrepresented Obama's 'answer', though. Obama said he doesn't generally get involved with prosecutions, which is a roundabout way of saying he doesn't know about the case. The man is too self-absorbed to straight up admit ignorance.
Even so, those words definitely don't mean that Obama claims to have "no control" as Mozart kept repeating over and over. That is intentional misrepresentation. "Involvement" is not a synonym for "control."
@Eincrou For sake of argument - Mozart asked an honest question, and got prevarication in response. If Obama had an ounce of integrity to him he wouldn't have danced around the wording, he would have answered the intent behind the question.
Our of sake of argument, Obama is just another statist nightmare; no surprise there.
I don't know how you managed to get 'Obama' and 'integrity' into one sentence, but whatever the case:
The only thing we can take from his answer is that he wants to protect Americans' IP rights from "expropriation" by foreigners. He made a big deal about this in the SotU WRT China.
The O'Dwyer case falls under this principle, so I think it's safe to assume Obama supports it. He didn't say that b/c he didn't know the exact case, IMO.
Heh heh heh chuckle. Kane.
Premier112 3 weeks ago
Kane? From the Brotherhood of Nod? Is that you?
LoganRidenour 3 weeks ago
@LoganRidenour Keep your voice down!
Aurini 3 weeks ago
Mike Mozart is a genious - Ive been subbed to him longer then you, but i disgress. I love his Idea and if i had that usless junk Iphone, i would downrate every single mainstream movie i could find and give a responce on why it is horrible. Unfortunatly I dont. still doesnt stop me from going to Rottentomatoes though ;)
Deathatheist 4 weeks ago
Mozart has a pretty good idea.
I do think he misrepresented Obama's 'answer', though. Obama said he doesn't generally get involved with prosecutions, which is a roundabout way of saying he doesn't know about the case. The man is too self-absorbed to straight up admit ignorance.
Even so, those words definitely don't mean that Obama claims to have "no control" as Mozart kept repeating over and over. That is intentional misrepresentation. "Involvement" is not a synonym for "control."
Eincrou 4 weeks ago
@Eincrou For sake of argument - Mozart asked an honest question, and got prevarication in response. If Obama had an ounce of integrity to him he wouldn't have danced around the wording, he would have answered the intent behind the question.
Our of sake of argument, Obama is just another statist nightmare; no surprise there.
Aurini 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Aurini " If Obama had an ounce of integrity..."
I don't know how you managed to get 'Obama' and 'integrity' into one sentence, but whatever the case:
The only thing we can take from his answer is that he wants to protect Americans' IP rights from "expropriation" by foreigners. He made a big deal about this in the SotU WRT China.
The O'Dwyer case falls under this principle, so I think it's safe to assume Obama supports it. He didn't say that b/c he didn't know the exact case, IMO.
Eincrou 4 weeks ago
Yeah, nigga!
lovingsingleton 4 weeks ago
Cry havoc and let slip the trolls of war.
Dude I'm so giddy right now.
Dirge987 4 weeks ago
subbed and liked the video :)
snakebitgoat 4 weeks ago
@snakebitgoat Liar, you subbed ages ago.
Aurini 4 weeks ago
@Aurini I meant Jeepersmedia ;)
snakebitgoat 4 weeks ago
I saw the video and i cringed when i saw obama tip-toe around the issue.
ProDCloud 4 weeks ago