@narono1510 im only an undergrad so double check this,But i dont think that you can. As the lady said,youd have to prove the interior sum synthetic a priori(The knowledge of the interior sum is discovered due you synthesising experiences and concepts,yet this is done prior to experience of a triangle as a triangle is a construction of the mind using the a priori concept of time-no triangles exist in the external world,only shapes which imperfectly represent them.something like that anyways
Judith V Grabiner is absolutely marvellous; she makes difficult subjects easy to understand and she has such amazing charisma. Not your regular maths professor!
PLEASE do not take these lectures on Kant down at the end of the class. They are extremely helpful and it would be a shame to remove such a resource from those eager to use them.
@alifeofreason Nietzsche would laugh? Nietzsche was the end of metaphysics in general. And Ayn Rand's philosophy expounded very significant things that needed to be established.
i beg to differr with the final quote, space is not the form possible perceptions, it is to most like ingeneering concepts,or mostly any mental picture or sense but this is only because our senses are so strongly atached to a spacial contex(vew touch even sound) but u can imagine some concepts without the need of space, not as a whole universe or model of existance...but u can have thoughts wich do not require space,like concepts such as death or even arithmetics here u just think of values
From a modern viewpoint of mathematics it is not quite obvious that the judgment about the sum of the angles of a triangle is synthetic. A lot of 20th effort has been focused on mechanising mathematics. Thus finding truth becomes essentially a handle-pushing exercise that could be equally well, if not more reliably, performed by a computer. The perception of space is only require to formalise geometry, but not to prove the conjecture, which thus becomes analytic.
'we can imagine a space without objects, an empty space, but we can't imagine objects without space'
If this is empirical then Kant is empirically wrong. If you try to imagine space without objects then you will fail, it has to be a space marked out by objects or - in the mind - a space unlimited by other concepts in the mind. to imagine space without any other concepts in your mind is a metaphysical impossibility since the concept of self will always be there, as will the concept of your mind.
When do the strippers come out ?
Ranger11413 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
love talking to grandma.... nice deliberation of words...
lovelplants 2 months ago
i wish my grandsmas would have spoken to me like that. my life would've been totally different.
philipkthompson 2 months ago
space and time work....if iraaan called me tomarow i might answer 716 1719
MegaKickurass 3 months ago
someone could just download and upload again this lectures :D
FilosofieRomaneasca 4 months ago
female Chomsky?
oali94 5 months ago 3
Comment removed
hannififo 5 months ago in playlist hannififo's Favorited Videos
I wonder what would happen if this aired some night instead of jersey shore
dylanlawless1 5 months ago 18
@dylanlawless1 There'd be too many Platonists.
davidus3 5 months ago
I say--what a clever dame!
mlknight14 6 months ago 2
umm i hate to burst kant's bubble but i can analytically prove that a triangle's interior angles add up to 180 degrees
narono1510 6 months ago
@narono1510 im only an undergrad so double check this,But i dont think that you can. As the lady said,youd have to prove the interior sum synthetic a priori(The knowledge of the interior sum is discovered due you synthesising experiences and concepts,yet this is done prior to experience of a triangle as a triangle is a construction of the mind using the a priori concept of time-no triangles exist in the external world,only shapes which imperfectly represent them.something like that anyways
iHateCensorship99999 1 month ago
Judith V Grabiner is absolutely marvellous; she makes difficult subjects easy to understand and she has such amazing charisma. Not your regular maths professor!
EmotionalWasteland 8 months ago
i wish my professor be like these but no hope , good lecture
r240j 9 months ago
PLEASE do not take these lectures on Kant down at the end of the class. They are extremely helpful and it would be a shame to remove such a resource from those eager to use them.
GAREBEARB92 9 months ago 2
@alifeofreason true dat
guruu13 9 months ago
Ayn Rand sister.
coatofarms05 10 months ago
You're awesome!!
ForestMarchini 10 months ago
@alifeofreason Nietzsche would laugh? Nietzsche was the end of metaphysics in general. And Ayn Rand's philosophy expounded very significant things that needed to be established.
ZerstorenAH 11 months ago
@ZerstorenAH LOL! Established on her own biases you mean?
slitor 8 months ago
Comment removed
ThePakChina 11 months ago
i beg to differr with the final quote, space is not the form possible perceptions, it is to most like ingeneering concepts,or mostly any mental picture or sense but this is only because our senses are so strongly atached to a spacial contex(vew touch even sound) but u can imagine some concepts without the need of space, not as a whole universe or model of existance...but u can have thoughts wich do not require space,like concepts such as death or even arithmetics here u just think of values
smutery 1 year ago
From a modern viewpoint of mathematics it is not quite obvious that the judgment about the sum of the angles of a triangle is synthetic. A lot of 20th effort has been focused on mechanising mathematics. Thus finding truth becomes essentially a handle-pushing exercise that could be equally well, if not more reliably, performed by a computer. The perception of space is only require to formalise geometry, but not to prove the conjecture, which thus becomes analytic.
fzeyda 1 year ago
Thank you sooo much for posting these.
SherryVapors 1 year ago
@Steve2323ZX screw you, irrational fuckwit.
dannidandannikins 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dannidandannikins fuck you, piece of shit randroid
Steve2323ZX 1 year ago
I am too stupid to be watching this.
MULESLAX 1 year ago 2
This is very useful, thanks so much for sharing! :)
blatantblithe 1 year ago
A real thought provoker.
Zaphenath4 1 year ago
The proper German pronunciation of Kant sounds rather like the one-syllable Anglo-Saxon term for "vagina."
Fersomling 1 year ago
cheers
MrSeanMDickinson 2 years ago
'we can imagine a space without objects, an empty space, but we can't imagine objects without space'
If this is empirical then Kant is empirically wrong. If you try to imagine space without objects then you will fail, it has to be a space marked out by objects or - in the mind - a space unlimited by other concepts in the mind. to imagine space without any other concepts in your mind is a metaphysical impossibility since the concept of self will always be there, as will the concept of your mind.
dannidandannikins 2 years ago
@dannidandannikins I concur! This befuddled me as well, didn't seem right!
MULESLAX 1 year ago