Make an OpenCL implementation and maybe it this tech could survive. While it is a proprietary tech only the only use of it is making a cool looking presentations on the shows.
its sad that 98% of people dont understand how much power is needed to rending these kinds of demos ... sad really that no 1 apretiates that us humans have to go through to make things like this... these people are not credited enough
0:09 damn i am fabulous!
Lord5oth 5 days ago
I want those demos.... :D
GhostDVideos 1 year ago
Make an OpenCL implementation and maybe it this tech could survive. While it is a proprietary tech only the only use of it is making a cool looking presentations on the shows.
BCEMCOCATb 2 years ago
@BCEMCOCATb um they do have OpenCL on the new Fermi cards... you can download the SDK and dev on those cards... w/ C++, C# and others
enkrypt3d 2 years ago
@enkrypt3d, Nvidia has OpenCL support starting from G80.
But I'm talking about PhysX OpenCL implementation, so PhysX could be executed on any OpenGL supported device with no restrictions.
Havok team is currently working on opened OpenCL implementation. They showed a demo at GDC 2009. You can find it on yt
BCEMCOCATb 2 years ago
nice but lot of particals
ashleybeshir 2 years ago
200.000 particles?! Omg, that's a tough one.
SonsOfHateSphere 2 years ago
I have a video of 1 million in real time.
Check out some of the apps i show in my videos, particularly "oe-cake".
01DOGG01 2 years ago
its sad that 98% of people dont understand how much power is needed to rending these kinds of demos ... sad really that no 1 apretiates that us humans have to go through to make things like this... these people are not credited enough
Stuna2150 2 years ago 17
It's only during the last few years that computers have become powerful enough for this stuff to go mainstream.
I mean you can read SPH books from the 80s. And CFD (Computational fluid dynamics) has been around since the 60s.
But naturally if you weren't NASA, you could never compute that amount of information.
01DOGG01 2 years ago
and its funny how my lap top has more power then what nasa had back thten lol ... imagine what they could have done using my lap top =]
Stuna2150 2 years ago
Yeah, i mean they had only 2mhz to work with when landing on the moon.
Another thing that impresses me is how Larry Cuba made the star wars animation in 1977 (video: "Making of the Computer Graphics for Star Wars").
Or 2 years earlier in 1975 "Arabesque by John Whitney with Larry Cuba". That animation was way ahead of it's time.
01DOGG01 2 years ago
LMFAO ~!!!!! 2mhZ !!!!
my cell phone is more powerfull then that !!! pahahah how the hell you land on the moon with that !!! wow that is truly amazing..
as for star wars yes i agree .. wonder how long it took to render that movie =]
Stuna2150 2 years ago
@Stuna2150 no it's good because not everybody can understand everything :)
dominoc5 1 year ago
first post, teh
SHOPATTHEMALL 2 years ago