Adobe

[lehazyo]

I still do not understand: are those small parts of image are made by special lens (one big lens out of thousands of small) or by some other means?

[peanut1110]

LYTRO !

[futurtimes]

So is this why insects have compound eyes?

[thenonhacker]

@futurtimes Excellent insight there my friend! :D Makes sense. This gives insects the ability to see at varying focal lengths.

[OEvseev]

ебануться!!

[tiago39865]

tradus o comentario meu colega eu vou faze com ele oque o cava lo fes com a egua

[nafsiatia]

Nice, you can also try

[sysdefect]

Enhance!

[n1nj4sp4rt4n]

inb4 blade-runner esque images

[HardCoreStefanO]

f+ck u adobe i cant see movies no more i download ur update nothing happend bunch a f+ckin a+sholes

[misterjvik]

Plenoptics win

[Pesuca]

Acojonante :-)

[Dude902]

How do they keep it in a state between a final picture and whatever the input is?

[ytubeadmin]

This is not possible, IMHO fake

[ytubeadmin]

@ytubeadmin

OOPs, after searching - graphics.stanford.edu/papers/l­fcamera/lfcamera-150dpi. and add there a pdf

[someguyXVII]

Vote for Pedro!

[AsAnAtheistFilms]

Awesome.

[fourthestatepubllc]

What, what?!? I WANT this! It's a photog's dream!!

[helloterran]

how about the resolution? you guys solved that?

[iggybibi]

@TheJugglingJohn ya but having it focused everywhere would be easier for every normal camera user and u could per example if u want choose to be able to focus on one thing

[CoffinKriz]

At 1:00 it looks like a ton of vaginas everywhere

[mnor7373]

This is trully exciting. As someone who spends a lot of time editing other peoples it would be great to be able to use images that I previously would have passed on.

[roier75]

That's amazing!!

Is it just me or is this the closest device yet to a human eye?!

[iggybibi]

ok since u can focus on anything can't u combine them somehow to make a photo focused on everything alltogether now that would be awsome for per example a camera that automatically takes a fully focused photo

[TheJugglingJohn]

@iggybibi You're obviously not a photographer. Part of the art of photography is working with what objects are in focus and which are out of focus. It's a delicate art, and most of the time the point is to /not/ have the image entirely in focus.

[chirpieguy]

@iggybibi Cameras already do this. Just shoot at a really high f stop. (You'll need a lot of light to accomplish this though...)

[misterjvik]

@chirpieguy Meh. Cameras can not already do this. That's just a workaround.

[2SLipo]

From the looks of it, they used approx 4,800 mini-lenses placed in an 80x60 arrangement. If the lenses hold 5 megapixels each, the total raw file size is about 24,000 megapixels or 24 gigapixels.

And assuming each lenses is 2mm in diameter and without gaps in between, the total area of the lens panel board alone would be 160mm wide by 120mm high.

[shoegazer666]

ENHANCE!!

[SpentOner]

really? the title is "Adobe" and there's no description. thanks for all the info.

[conyo985]

@SpentOner

I'm surprised it got a lot of views.

[jlg395]

An incredible idea presented by a horrible salesman. Thanks, horrible salesman!

[Brandonpeterg2Gmail]

WOW, that's hot!

[PIECE2YOURMOTHA]

Wouldn't the image be like a bazillion Gigs? 

[catstuffer]

MOAR MINDCRAFT!!!

[brandongonz84]

@catstuffer LMAO WTF

[nuahsx]

wait so you can now take pictures without having to worry about focusing? *passes out*

[hahayouknowme33]

pedobear

[Ioganstone]

lame

[netpetnet]

could someone type in ghost tub and tell me how they did that? i cant figure it out

[TheAustinBorkenhagen]

wow

[K1kuch1]

That is AWESOME!

[MinhaBoca]

fuck 

[megastuffer]

до чего техника дошла

[MilleniumAtheist]

@megastuffer Da nechevo. Scora eta ne bydet shetatca noviim ee wce zabudut kagda vedet novia, bolia horoshia programa, shetat shto ana samaia luchshaya. Ee appatt. Ee appatt.

[diegoplindo]

/watch?v=WeNREHiRwT0

[21leftcenter]

i can do better than that in microsoft paint, you dinglesmacks

[marcelomarafigo]

just for a video matheus singing with only 5 years old, copy and paste in search of you tube (/ watch? v = SLAv7e8Ii3c)

[FantageLover916]

hot girl

[menoziinrevoltado]

Correct me if I'm wrong but...

This will only work with small apertures.

At least, that's what I can assume.

[TheRyanmaddy]

lame

[Zelda2982]

In laymans terms whats actually happening?

whats the thing he is showing off?

i know its some sort of photoshop effect?

but i didn't understand what he was saying

[ThePleather]

@Zelda2982 Someone within Adobe, or a group of people within, has developed a feature to change the focus of a photo after the photo has already been taken. So, say you take a photo of a person standing in front of a statue, and the statue is in focus instead of the person, who is thus all blurry and... out of focus. This feature allows you to alter the focus of particular parts of an image: to sharpen the desired objects or areas in a photo by computing what they would like if in focus.

[tlsviddies]

Bummer that they didn't hire Steve Jobs to introduce this. This guy speaks so slow and boring. If they had Steve Jobs introduce it, it would be everywhere in the newspapers. But of course Steve and Adobe don't go well together ;P

[Madizzle013]

wtf

[Limelighthdtv]

I reckon a bit of forethought will give us surround vision omnidirectional lenses witjin a decade. And I haven't been smoking ;-)

[fixingbraincell]

ADOBE SHOULD PHOTOSHOP HIS VOICE.

[piffyxP]

@fixingbraincell lmao honestly I was also annoyed by his voice ;p

[terzyx]

This is Todor Georgiev - the main developer of this ADOBE topic. Hi is Bulgarian... Ya, hi got an accent :) but u agree THE PRODUCT GREAT!

[7677890]

Hmmm... a 100mpx sensor reduced to a 5.1mpx result simply to correct a few focussing issues seems a bit of a waste a 3D lens sounds like a better idea.

[RivenX3i]

OMG... What???!!

[nazar1394]

Пизнець...

[dtman83]

@nazar1394 Что это значит?

[nazar1394]

@dtman83 This technology shocked my mind...

[Matrix29bear]

Adobe shows off plenoptic lenses that let you refocus an image after it's taken (video)

[djonlinemoscow]

То же самое можно сделать со стереообъективом (или с камерой вроде Fuji 3D). Выставив маленькую диафрагму и получив два чётких снимка (без боке, неразмазанные), мы можем построить по ним карту глубины, и затем уже работать с полностью объёмной картинкой, меняя виртуальную глубину резкости, фокус, бокэ, и так далее. Удивительно, что Fuji в своём первом 3D фотоаппарате с двумя объективами это ещё не сделали.

[vajemoun]

Imagine combining this with eye-tracking... Focusing there where you look just like in real life

[BigMTBrain]

@vajemoun - I thought of that as well. In a future where bandwidth is not an issue, a live telepresence stream for any number of viewers would allow all viewers to independently adjust zoom, pan, and, now, focus.

[RareVDO]

How is this different from taking multiple pictures of different focus?

I think Apple is already implementing something similar with iphone 4 - the HDR photography which takes multiple photos then let user adjust the lighting - same can probably be done with same tech but instead on camera focal distance.

[venuecam]

@RareVDO The difference is that you only need one "input". As the speaker says "...no image was actually captured..." therefore it can be adjusted, not refocused, leaving every detail available for the user to tweak.

HDR has been in photography even before digital SLRs. It has become more popular recently and Apple has decided to use the tech int their devices. FYI the user cannot adjust the end image in HDR on Apple devices... yet.

[ophello]

@RareVDO

this is completely different. using a square aperture lets the computer re-create ANY focal length. apple isnt messing with this at all. you have no idea what you're talking about.

[gmcubed]

@RareVDO taking multiple pics that look the same, at least with moving subjects can be a pain, sometimes impossible. being able to adjust this in post would be a godsend.

[flowmaster997]

@RareVDO that would require having the camera perfectly still for however many shots it took, so your confined to a tripod for lets say 8-10 photos. also it adds time, you have to wait for the number of photos taken, and everything in your picture would have to remain stationary because if something moves between shots the whole thing gets messed up. also your confined by the DOF of the original photos. you you cant have too shallow dof.

imo, too impractical, but adobe offers a viable solution.

[Theokondak]

@flowmaster997 not rly.losing some resolution for image stabilization could be the answer.

[ThePandaMovement]

BLACK MAGIC.

[whereisthediscoteque]

Holy crap. 

[geneffects]

You have to wait 1:41 before the "ENHNCE!" money shots begin

[vanman2008a2008]

Will this be in Photoshop CS6? ;-)

[eatmyshorts2007]

god created this too...

[mikedeere]

This has so many implications for the future of photography it's unreal...

[BigMTBrain]

@mikedeere - for live broadcast and surveillance as well.

[jminnix]

ENHANCE!!!!!

[FuturePharmD91]

Enhance

[FuturePharmD91]

#Enhance

[Nate3625]

in at under a thousand views.

[EmperorOfMars]

Dude, we can finally have CSI shit!!!

[speedmatters]

That is brilliant! As a photographer I'm chomping at the bit to see this technology asap. Although I wonder how the depth of field / aperture relationship works when taking the RAW 'image'. Could this be done in very low light conditions too, like f1.2 @ 1/30 low light and is you depth of field still limited to that of the original shots DOF or can you have all the scene in focus or just very a narrow DOF with smooth Bokeh? Too many questions! Hurry up 2020 tech :)

[Zebonka]

Hello, Future - when did you get here?

[lafanfafra]

bella gagata!

[george385]

Amazing - and surely a good application of technology for a security camera?

[randomoriginal]

You have got to be kidding me!! Now every Director I work with will be "Just fix it in post"

[darkbit1001]

Wow, that is amazing, but what is the loss in quality due to all those sub-images?

[mutovkin]

This is probably the most groundbreaking thing I saw this year.

[samichthor]

Watch out CSI and professional photographers, here come the crappy photographers with overpriced lenses!!!

[sbr6]

@samichthor Dont' worry! just keep practicing and you will get better :)

[ErikRicardoLC]

@samichthor this is not about that

[garethop]

i'd rather know about this in 2 years when we can actually use it, not now so I can just be pissed I don't have it :)

[omatu1]

ppl gotta do realize that this doesn't save your blurry pics taken ages ago.

[klydefrogg]

@omatu1 people won't realize that, though...people will be walking into photo shops around the country with shoeboxes full of unsharp pictures saying they saw a picture get refocused on youtube 

[klydefrogg]

now, rotate the camera around the camera 90 degrees around the subject so i can see what the girl was taking a picture of. c'mon... i saw it in a movie once. seth green wouldn't lie to me.

[latexink]

That must be a pretty serious workstation to work with all that adobe software on it

[Mocib]

@latexink

This was filmed at the NVIDIA GPU Technology Conference 2010.

[roborovskihamsters]

Woaah... epic. can't wait for this to be main stream.

[gustoizm]

so dope.