Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Racism was not invented by the jews. Please don't be stupid. I am sure you were taught that by racist theology. If we as people could get rid of race,then we would also be able to get rid of racism. I someday we will.........I think if we would all repeant God would give of grace and save us from our sin.......

  • Racism was invented by Jews, particularly the Jewish Talmud.

  • @LordMalice6d9 I am sorry friend. I looked your comments over again, and I finally get it!!!!!!!!!

  • There is no proof that darwin ever lived.

  • @darkfur35 Obvious troll is obvious

  • @torm0 A boring troll is obvious, Grow up. cry baby.

  • @darkfur35 Suck a Jesus cock troll.

  • @torm0 One sick troll. Go back to Hell. cry baby

  • @darkfur35 Prove it exists bitch, y u so mad?

  • "Race" is a biological and genetic myth, look up "a scientific test of race" for more info.

    The human genome project found no evidence of biological "races" in humans, only continuous human genetic variation with 7 billion individuals, not "races".

  • Oh sigh, how could people even take the idea of racism and slavery seriously when both Racism and Slavery clearly pre-date Darwin? Just look at the Indian caste-systems or even historically at Christianity that were racist because Cain's children were "black" and were to be hated by all? Slavery easily dates back to ancient Egypt and only became really became an International social stigma/immorality a few decades after Darwin's death, it certainly did not re-peek or anything of the sort.

  • correction: how could people even take the idea of racism and slavery being related to the teaching of Charles Darwin seriously when...

  • darwin is like salt & slugs, in regards too combating racism with facts. hes the only thing that shuts these nazi/skinhead/youtube thugs up !!

    long live darwin !!!

  • It's impossible for Darwin to invent something that existed before he was born. I don't think the argument has been he invented racism but that his theories had encouraged racial superiority and genocide.

  • Comment removed

  • It's depressing and mind-numbing; how American Christians (as well as a few Jews) blame Charles Darwin for the Holocaust (as Scientologists likewise blame Sigmund Freud), when it was Martin Luther's 'On the Jews and Their Lies' the Nazis and their Christian supporters waved about.

  • Darwin invented racism? Now, I'm no scholar, but I KNOW that ain't right.

  • He didn't invent it, but he sure helped it along...

  • When is calling someone a "savage" the sign that u believe in brothehood and the equality of mankind?

  • Erm....if you want to know who was one of the first to pen the word "racism" look no further than Mr. Lev Davidovich Bronshtein aka Trotsky. He used it to attack the Slavic peoples who wouldn't submit their cultures and traditions to communist takeover. The word racism is a recent phenomena, although there certainly was PREJUDICE towards people of different races before. Thus racist/ism is modern phenomena and a JEWISH one at that. Also, slavery existed long before the trans Atlantic Slave trade

  • i invented rascism.

  • Abe Lincoln and Charles Darwin were born on the very same day. Lincoln set free the physically enslaved and Darwin set free the mentally enslaved. 80% of the scientific world recognized evolution as the true history of life on earth within only 20 years from the time Darwin wrote it down. The most influential book in history.

    "All truth passes through three stages. First it is ridiculed, Second it is violently opposed. Third it is accepted as self-evident." -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

  • This stuff was going on long before Jesus,Moses, or even Abraham. Stalin, Mao, N Korea, Hitler, Persians, and the Romans slaughtered millions of Christians and Jews.

    Killing and raping is unfortunately part of the collective of human nature.

  • Comment removed

  • Darwin Stolen that Idea from an arab Ibn Maskavaih ,a 9th century researcher.Like many other theories that bear european names came from those arabs.Accroding to Ibn Maskavaih the missing link was date-palm tree which has the quality that if you cut the head it will die which is an animal property not plants property.From it came the inferior animals to superior animals and then from superior animals can inferior humen and then superior human.Thats enough for shitting on darwins face!

  • The Greeks also had evolution-like ideas. The Arabs kept a lot of the Greek's knowledge alive while the Christians dumbed down the whole of Europe in the Dark Ages - we have a lot to be thankful to them for. If only Christianity had had a concept of 'Ilm' like the Muslims did, we might be a lot more advanced by now.

    The concept of evolution was not new, but no-one had a credible theory of descent with modification through natural selection before Darwin.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • If you are going to trumpet the achievements of Islamic Scholars, at least give them the honour of being accurate! They were heirs to the Greek's knowledge, the Islamic Golden Age occurred at least 1000yrs after the Ancient Greek civilisation. Arab scholars such as Ibn al-Haytham took science to the next level.

    It is thanks to Ibn al-Haytham, who formulated the Scientific Method, that we have Newton, Darwin, Einstein. Not the likes of Ibn Maskavaih, whose theory is unscientific and illogical.

  • 'Matter, therefore, adopted the form of vapour which assumed the shape of water in due time. The next stage of development was mineral life. Different kinds of stones developed in course of time. Their highest form being mirjan (coral). It is a stone which has in it branches like those of a tree. After mineral life evolves vegetation. ' : Ibn Maskavaih.

    Rubbish! Coral is animal, not a mineral or form of vegetation. Maskavaih's assertions are uninformed by any sort of scientific method.

  • true, Muslims contribution to scientific knowledge is reality, however later developments in this group of people led to different direction

  • @leotakesleo most of what Middle-Eastern science did was essentially just plagiarized the sources they either traded with or conquered. Many things we consider Arab are not Arab ... like Arabic numerals aren't Arabic, they are Indian. Fact is Greeks were far on the scene before the Arab Scholars who gave to science the idea of sharing/spreading knowledge... but did little in contribution to developing it, itself. And indeed Natural Selection IS originally a Greek philosophy from about 300BC.

  • @DoomsdayR3sistance : Just popped that out of your ass.Cooked up information doesnt count as accurate.

  • @leotakesleo *yawn*, just because you don't want to believe it, doesn't make it not true. Fact is that the Muslims did conquer or trade with other places. Arabic is really from India, a lot of Islamic science came from Greek sources, They plundered the Library of Alexandria and we have no idea how much "knowledge" they obtained from that. I bet you haven't even bothered looking up "Greek Natural Selection" before commenting, you'd be surprised how not-cooked up the information IS.

  • @DoomsdayR3sistance :yawning already? why not get a shower...you stink!

  • @leotakesleo Sure sure.... why don't you acknowledge the fact you got called on already by a few people for your BS claim that Natural Selection originated from the Middle East, rather then where it actually Originated, Ancient Greece.

  • Comment removed

  • @leotakesleo as you say, a false claim is a false claim, and you yourself made a false claim. I care about facts only. Personally I don't care about fantasies or what not, that said. I believe giving false credit to Islam is dangerous, but then I consider what Islam does to nations it dominates enough to justify calling it a dangerous religion anyway, let alone the methods used to dominate a nation.

  • Comment removed

  • @leotakesleo erm, did any of that make any sense at all? I think you need to rewrite that in a form that actually conveys what you mean. Not that I can't tell you are trying to insult me, but that any form of ad hominem has little to no effect on myself, that as to say, I really couldn't care if you are trying to insult me, I'll just ignore it.

  • @DoomsdayR3sistance : like from whom they plagarised?Name them!

    The matter of the fact is that The homosexual greeks plagarised ideas from Egyptians and they were filtered by arabs and now adopted by homo-europeans..lol

  • @leotakesleo We do not know how invented Natural Selection, we know however Anaximander (who has already been mentioned) talked about it in ~600BC, ~1,250 years before Islam even existed). Personally my Greek history is not that strong, but everything time I actually bother to look up anything related to Ancient Islamic Science, it ends out inevitably like Thomas Jefferson's light bulb... Plagiarized (off of Joseph Swan if you are wondering). And for 1,200 years, Islam has produce nothing.

  • Comment removed

  • @leotakesleo you mean Darwin that got married and had several children right... that would be... so un-homosexual, unless you meant Homo Sapien, then yes, I am Homo Sapien but if you think that were an insult, well then you'd be saying you aren't. Of course what we do know is that Natural Selection originated in Ancient Greece, and you seem to be refusing to accept that for some reason. What that reason is, I dunno but if you keep talking here I'll probably figure it out sooner or later.

  • Comment removed

  • @leotakesleo oooook. So the people that figured out the world was round... or that the Sun was at the center of the Solar System... no advanced knowledge. Or do you think you can date these discoveries before? The idea of Natural selection does not seem to predate and many other things also appear with them. It is just unfortunate that Homer's Poetry probably lead a lot to modern day religion.

  • @DoomsdayR3sistance : what monkey theory got to do with earth round or solar system? Jumping here and there? catching up straws? The monkey theory was a stolen idea and you couldnt refute it....i rest my case!

  • @leotakesleo it doesn't fool. What it relates to is "Greek had no advanced knowledge of anything". I have no need to "refute it", you have made a baseless claim, you need evidence, we have already supplied evidence in the form of Anaximander, you have not yet supplied any such evidence and thus there is no reason to even bother.

    It'd be the same thing if you claimed fairies existed, you'd need at least some form of realistic/reliable evidence before you'd ever be taken seriously.

  • @DoomsdayR3sistance : Anaximander that you claim is more of a fairy tale than i am saying...Some cooked up character made by some fiction story writer probably in some agency's work shop...lol

    come up with something better!

  • @leotakesleo *yawn*. Sorry was this an attempt at a debunk? A guy we have historic records about.... can date ideas both right and wrong back too... fairy tale... sure.... I am still waiting for you to come up with something... actually just anything, truthful at all that makes a real point.

  • Comment removed

  • @leotakesleo I yawn because you don't create points, arguments or debate, you just create mindless ramblings that clearly make no sense to anybody but yourself and so thus leaves the entire thing stale and boring. Of course you could actually make a point or try arguing a debate but I doubt that'll happen any time soon.

  • Comment removed

  • @leotakesleo *Yawn*, Sorry, but I can't stop it if all you are going to do is rant because you don't like something. Guess what, reality is full of things we can't change. So stop getting hung up over the little details of who created the original ideas behind Evolution, because as you have been told when you suggested it was the Arabs, that even that was wrong and it predates even that. Else wise you are just pointless ranting off of pure ego and nothing more.

  • @DoomsdayR3sistance : you need a doctor!

  • @leotakesleo seriously. I can't be bothered to respond to you anymore, you don't seem to be capable of actually saying anything meaningful so I shall no longer respond to this. Bye

  • @DoomsdayR3sistance : good decision ..you should have run to the doctor earlier

  • @DoomsdayR3sistance Religeous people try to claim most sciences as their own. If islam is so scientifically superior why are the orientals, americans and europeans the most technologically advanced. That leo guys a joke.

  • @dogblessamerica "If only Christianity had had a concept of 'Ilm' like the Muslims did, we might be a lot more advanced by now"

    That must be why muslim societies are Sooooo advanced now, yeah?

    (heavy on the sarcasm)

  • @oldstock1607 If what you say is true why are muslims so far behind the rest of the world!!!!!!!!! just look at the middle east,the jews are more advance than all their neighbors, and they have only had there own country for 60 years.......

  • @MrAngates you must have missed the part where I had "heavy on the sarcasm" at the bottom of my statement. I agree with you completely.

  • @leotakesleo Have you ever heard of Anaximander of Miletus (610 BC-546 BC) ? He was the first, that we know of, who thought that life evolved from simpler organisms.

  • slavery was in place centuries before darwin, white/ blacks/ arabs / asian where all slave at some point in history,

    but i do belive that recent point of views of racissim was darwins creation,

  • Your statement makes no sense and is insulting because your trivialize racism.

  • it comes to geography, the aztects did not enjoy the trade and new ideas,eroupe and asia shared. but they still had art,religion,love, war every thing that we consider human.

    the fact that i have a computer does not make me better then some one who dosent.

  • i dont like how Darwin viewed the Tasmanian Aborigines

  • I take your point. Reading Darwin's 'The Voyage of the Beagle' gave me many very uncomfortable moments. It's only when you compare him to many of his contemporaries that he comes off remotely well. But either way, the notion that he was deliberately furthering a racist agenda for its own sake is false (IMHO).

  • Comment removed

  • Please note I am DEBUNKING this video - sorry if that wasn't clear at the start...

  • good work, I'm an idiot.

  • Lol - I've often done the same thing.

  • Alot of racist look up to darwin...I agree with you.

  • Then they misunderstand Darwin's theory, and Darwin's views on racism.

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more