Haneke is just another prude moralist, only instead of wearing the clothes of a religious zealot he wears the clothes of a secular liberal. I enjoy violence in film and I will continue to enjoy violence in film, and Haneke can wag his finger at me all he likes, but I really could care less what someone who's willing to film an actor actually killing an animal and put that footage in his film thinks of me.
Haneke strikes me as a closet sadist, anyway. All of his films are fixated on suffering.
I think Haneke tries to get rid of any redemption whatsoever towards violence in any film, since even in films where there´s no good guy or anything (and these are in my opinion the best ones) and after just having one hour and thirty minutes of slashin´and slicin´, we still can seat back and enjoy and watch the next film, this time with Bruce Willis, and forget about violence entirely
The genius with the original Funny Games was that the violence was very much implied. It also forewent convention by having an interactive element with its audience to heighten the impact of the violence being perpetrated against the family. This remake was a totally unnecessary retread and felt more akin to a home invasion movie; rather than a commentary on people's complacency with violence in the mainstream.
"and then when the really awful thing is happening you rewind it - Oh, grow up!" This woman is stupid ^^ -
There is all this torture and when finally, you see the killing and blood you have desired but not were able to see all the time in this movie - then it gets rewinded and the satisfaction derived from your own bloodlust for revenge is suddenly diminished! It is so pointless to make a movie unsatisfying like that - oh. grow up!
It worked as it should. You didnt notice it, little girl. ;)
I've always been wanting to ask this of someone with your opinion:
What exactly is wrong with wanting those two murderous psychopaths to get blown away with a shotgun. Why does that qualify as "bloodlust for revenge", which is clearly a bad thing in your view.
FUCK OFF YOU RETARD REVIEWERS YOU DONT KNOW WHAT YOUR ON ABOUT THESE "PROFFESSIONAL REVIEWERS SUCK BALLS" THEY ALWAYS GO AGAINST THE PROPER FILM FANS THAT LOVE CINEMA FOR WHAT IT IS RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
As far as Horror films go this is one good film. very simple, Very Tense, Hardely any music. No glorifying violence, good use of the fourth wall! and a good twist aswell. This film is genius. A true horror film!!!!!
Their very harsh on it I feal! this movie is very unique with the concept! And as far as horror films go this is a pretty horrifying idea! It,s not a fuking remake of benny,s video! and who wants to see a old woman stripped!
Well, i think Funny Games U.S is uncomfortable viewing. I didn't see the original so i come without prejudice. I thought Naomi Watts was terrific, i disagree that she was miscast, it's almost as if the woman involved in this round table discussion review suggests that just because Naomi Watts has a great body, somehow that would be less humiliating. Oh yeh she's been naked in Mulholland Drive. Oh well that's really taken me out of the moment. You grow up!
It might have been good if it was not boring.. The third act has to be the longest and most boring part in any movie ever.. No climax, no anything. Just watching the two main characters dick around with a phone and sitting. Not to mention all the long house, wall and floor shots. Yes this movie is realy good.. The intentions might have been intresting, but the product was shit.
Jesus that girl was brutal. I absolutely loved this movie. It was brilliant. I hate prissy critics that beat down a movie in comparison to other movies and this and that. It's a fantastic movie, take from it what you want. It's brilliant.
I agree, Naomi really was not a good choice. She is a product of Hollywood, everything Haneke's films seem to be going against. Even her acting style seems completely out of place.
I think the purpose to Funny Games is one of the most obvious things ever and the way these people talk about it makes them come of quite unintelligently. Except that the dude with the red tie seems to try to level with it a little bit more than the others...
WRONG... he didn't want to make an ENGLISH remake - he specifically wanted to make a U.S. remake since the whole idea of the movie is to show the absurdity of U.S. Horror films.
I don't agree that it is "telling us off" for wanting to see violence... I thought it was meant to deliberately piss me off, by playing to my expectations of the genre... I literally punched the air when Naomi shot one of the guys... And then when it re-wound, I was very pissed off, and I think that was the whole point.
Honestly, I think these reviewers are entirely missing the point of the movie. I have never heard such vacuous comments. One woman in particular completely misunderstood what she was watching. Some people never learn. I for one thought the remake was well done and perfectly casted.
The point of Funny Games is that it forces you to to address your relationship to movie violence: why is violence in a film only valid if it's thrilling or offers you some sort of redemption at the end? Funny Games gives you neither of these payoffs, so to call the film "senseless" is actually more of a compliment than an insult; it proves how effective the film is in delivering its central message: violence is worthless.
@geezpleez i disagree. Haneke makes his career from such films so to him are not worthless at all. The argument about whether violence is worthless or not is paradoxical. Someone always benefits whether it's the perpetrator or the filmmaker or even the audience if a lesson has been learnt.
@mousehead2000 I see your point but you might be reading too much into my use of the word "worthless". It could be a poor choice of word from me, but I only meant that Haneke obviously thinks conventional attitudes to movie violence are either narrow-minded or just invalid (or having little "value"). This provocation or variations of it seems to be at the heart of all his films, so I would agree that he's made a career – and benefitted – from violence one way or another.
@geezpleez I couldn't stand the remake cuz you can't do better than the original, but to say it's in bad taste or has no redeeming value, what? I love how they talk about "the audience" -- i'm an author, I have never thought of any AUDIENCE, this is MINE - the reason this is so disturbing, the original and has profound EFFECT iis becasue it's SO REAL, no one gets saved, they don't kill the bad guys at the end, it shows you a realistic event that could happen in a real way, see, REAL IS SCARY
@geezpleez But this isn't a new or interestingly delivered message. Kermode mentions Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, a much better film which also sees nothing titillating or "thrilling" about violence. The same is true of numerous horror films; it's simply not true that you can group "violent cinema" together as Haneke and the fans of Funny Games want to. It's a redundant lecture.
@geezpleez But there are plenty of films that raised the same themes in much more intelligent, subtle and original ways. So not only is it like being shouted at by Haneke for two hours, it's not even an original concept.
the whole idea of questioning our relationship to violence on screen or in the media is not a new idea. in fact, it's quite redundant really. And it's difficult for a film maker to pull it off without looking likea total hypocrite in the process.
the only Hanneke movie i really liked was The Piano Teacher.
I watched the original and was simply floored by its senselessness; perhaps the worst piece of shit I've ever seen. Commenting on violence and the media by making a film with endless shots of an inexplicable home invasion? The only thing the director did to combat violence was to make it ceaselessly boring
"I don't want Michael Haneke telling me off for occasionally liking violent films..."
I don't watch it often, but this is probably one of the worst reviews I've seen on this show (Newsnight Review).
I haven't seen the American version, but I thought the German original was quite funny - well, mildly amusing... It's only uncomfortable if you actually enjoy watching gratuitously violent films, probably...
i totally agree with most of the comments made here - what on earth is this show? Its very very embarrassing...the 'goth' lady should be ashamed of herself, id much prefer a show where there are actual critics on it.
I always thought the movie depicted violence in ways we are unaccustomed to seeing. For instance it it rare to see a dog killed in a movie, let alone a kid. We expect them to pull through the situation and survive but the deaths were blunt inevitabilities we aren't used to seeing in movies. At least thats what I got out of it.
Watts was cast because she is good, not because we can somehow avoid the fact we've seen her body before. That comment was ridiculous....and talk about miss the point. Once again, Kermode is the only person who really seems to know what he's saying
I agree with that. This pseudo critic shows just how childish and brainwashed by todays media she is when she says that it would be more humiliating if someone fatter or older had to strip. It doesn't matter what we see, it just matters how it's done and that's what makes it humiliating.
I agree that this film is shocking and a bit of a torture. But why on earth should every film just be a beautiful hollywood movie. I think this torture is essential in order for us to learn something.
You hit the nail on the head. In thinking on it, what this woman says is actually quite offensive.....so somehow, it's not as humiliatiing to this person....because she's what we think of as "beautiful"??? It's like when someone dies and we say, "aww, so good looking too!"....like if they weren't, it wouldn't be tragic??
they're missing the whole point of the movie, you're not supposed to ask yourself "why are you watching THIS violente movie?", but "why are you watching violent movies in general?"
The only difference between Funny Games and other violent movies is that Haneke's movie doesn't show violence as entertaining, beautiful or desirable
These kinds of people were the reason why this movie bombed in the box office. Furthermore, these people were the reason why so few people have even heard of Funny Games. Who cares that it was remade shot for shot, I don't. Actually, now that it has been shot in the English language I can focus on the entire environment within each scene, subtitles be damned. It's one thing to not like the movie because it is so disturbing, but that shouldn't scew their opinion on the quality of the film.
I must say that I wasn't a fan of this movie, but only because it was advertized as a popcorn thriller of the late 00s. In terms of its taboo of breaking cimeatographic rules (breaking the 4th wall), its point works well - but a lesson is learned here...
If you break teh rules, don't expect the mass audience to understand it, because they're going to the movies for entertainment, not moral questioning.
Its really funny to me how this film is discussed. The core of the film is an attack on the system of violence in bourgeoise society (basically our western world). It's concrete little devices of alienation (turning to the camera, etc.) are really, in my opinion, ways to shift the film from being simply an indulgent entertainment of cathartic violence. It implicates the system of contemp "egalitarian" attitudes (which hide class), proposing that subtle or not violence is just below the surface.
Ratings disabled? I wonder why... oh yeah, because these people don't know what they're talking about and this video deserves 0 stars. There isn't even someone there to counter argue with them! They're all just upset cause they didn't get their fix of senseless, no message violence...
@sylvainthefrenchman the whole point of the movie was to make the audience FEEL like they are an accomplice in a MURDER!!! He wanted the film to be uncomfortable and he wanted to make this to make torture porn movies look bad. He succeeded.
The guy wearing a tie understands it. And is aware that the others there dont. Discussion is useless. Either you get it or you are too frightened to accept what it is telling you. He is totally right when he says that people able to understand it would have been satisfied with seeing the original already. The brunette is the opposite, furiously whining about naivity she sees in it - confronted with her own immaturity in watching violence. She just doesnt want to accept it
Jesus, that woman is a moron! You don't choose Watts based on her looks, you choose her because......oh that's right, she's great! At least Mark isn't a complete idiot and looks at it constructively
The only thing I agree with is the casting. They're all considerably weaker than Arno Frisch, the late Ulrich Muhe, etc. And although I see what Kermode is saying vis a vis Haneke going backwards but I still think the film is brilliant no matter what language it's in. You're not supposed to enjoy it, that's not the point. Haneke wants to turn us on to our own bloodlust in films and how desensitized it has made us. That is the essence of Funny Games.
I liked this movie, it was so disturbing without a lot of gore. It doesn't fall in the "torture porn" category like lot of movies do nowadays. Some scenes that people found "Boooring" i think you missed the whole point of the movie. That's my opinion now if you don't like it the go watch some torture porn :)
I'm sorry but what gives you the right to stereotype a whole country (yes, my country) just because of someone elses opinion? I'm British and I thought this film was awesome.
the sickening fact that ANYONE actually finds this "movie" entertaining is a comment on the hopelessness of humanity.that we are FUCKED UP enough to allow this excrement as anything but an alqeida or C.I.A. training film is proof of our foolishness and inhumanity.eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow--we DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are a fool imo. This movie does not actually show any violence except for blood stains and if any thing its a psychological torture film.
Also, the entertainment is not in the torture but the characters actions. Watching people pushed to there limits and then some.
Imo this movie was boring with absolutely NO payoff at the end. There were a couple of funny/tense moments like when they stare at the screen but over all it was a movie with a message and no pay off.
First of all allow me to get my childish side out the way, What a bunch of fucking cunts! How can they sit there on what looks like a tacky Trisha set and discuss movies as if they are the fucking gods of it. Question...Is it three men or two, I got confused?
The film, in my opinion, was just a version for those sad, uneducated humans that can not, or just simply can't function or understand subtitles. The film was amazing, I am not saying anymore because I don't want to.
The ending should have been..After Naomi is thrown into the river,the camera goes to Tim roth who is still barely alive and manages to get the remote as he spits out blood.He then rewinds to the part when Tubby asks for eggs.Tim then comes from nowhere with a golfclub and beats the two weirdos to death .Thus preventing the massacre.When Naomi asks why he did it Tim winks at camera and the credits roll..Whaddya think!!
now this movie was good i loved the ending. Spoiler alert, how at the end he goes up to the people and he says could you help us out with some eggs. Another part i liked was that there wasn't actually alot of music in the movie to give it's terror there was like one screaming song i don't no the name but it was kind of like no country for old men which is my favourite coen brothers movie.
this movie is awesome!! the thing is that there's no need to see the deaths, just because you can imagine it, I mean the terrifying of this movie is the premonition of somenthing bad that it's going to happen but you don't get to see it, it just terrifies you during all the film!! amazing, I left the cinema with my friends horrified and fascinated at the same time!
you mostly just proved Michael Haneke's point by your comment
when ann picks up the shotgun and shots peter...the audience feels relief and happiness that finally the good guys got back at the bad guys...but when paul picks the remote up and rewinds, that just shows the audience that the way they want the movie to go is not going to happen and there is not a happy ending...
sarajoyx...you are very close minded and this film was most likely not for you...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
eh.. the movie wasn't good at all, i REALLY hated the remote rewind sceen and even moreso hated the looking into the camera and talking to the movie watchers bit even more.. but the PLOT and IDEA of the movie is AWESOME. also saddening that you didn't actually SEE anyone die..
It's so nice to see unsuccessful filmmake...oops sorry I mean film critics cast away something they don't understand simply for the reason they don't understand it. Applauds are in order!
Glad to hear that the majority of people here can recognise the genius that is haneke unlike the wannabe intellects in the clip. long live haneke!.. lol
That is, wannabe "intellectuals", rather than intellects. Shame you have not been endowed with the same prodigious ability in grammar that you have in film analysis.
Haneke's work has always been misinterpreted, in my opinion. I didn't feel that Funny Games was criticizing the horror loving audience. The fact that this movie holds so much tension ,and respect for what makes good horror good, proves that he is a horror fan himself. But what he may have actually tried to do was make us simply question our separation of what we want from reality and what we want from film. Otherwise, we may become manipulated by film to make buffoonish decisions.
Fuck them. They seriously have no clue what there talking about. Close-minded hacks. Its like making a show about the moon landing, and then saying "Wasnt it fake?" "Oh yeah, because the flag is blowing and blah blah". They seriously have no clue. AT ALL.
Benny video is a great movie,btw.the fact you turned it off proves how much effect it had on you.Some people can't handle too much due to their psychosomatic constitution.
Funny games is meant to show us that we are totally sensitized to violence in cinema.By shoving our face into a real torture scenario(which happens every day through rape,murders and tortures) we get to see what violence actually represents.Noble in a way but I feel all it does is condescend movie makers(we're not stupid) and give columbine worshipping sucicidal fucked up brats ideas.
Better than Bennys video though which I turned off out of disgust.
I must admit I'm intrigued by the film's premise, and having loved "Hidden" would be willing to give it a go, however Kermode's arguments are often very convincing...
The woman with the red hair and british looking guy next to her are the biggest morons i ever heard.Go get a job as a clerk,don't waste your time with something you can't understand!!!
I can't say I was a fan, it seems a little draconic and questionable to make an entire based upon the assumption that you've never questioned your enjoyement of voilence in the media, frankly it seems unfair that i had to watch a film who's purpose was largely obsolete in anyone who activly considers their own actions. The re-wind scene and the breaches in forth wall didnt help since it ironicly gave it a sense of unreality which is the opposite of what the film was going for.
I saw this film last Saturday and went into the cinema with no pre conceptions about what it would be like. I thought it was a pretty good film. Rather refreshing to have a bad ass ending where no one goes skipping off into the sunset. 2 couples actually walked out halfway through the film whispering 'This is Shit!' Basically they couldnt handle it!
The original is amazing and I'm quite anxious for this american version! As for this video, the red haired lady should work on her dictation, and find another job since it seems she just sayd the stupidest things you could ever hear regarding the movie and the whole subject!
this movie targets the human mind's wickedness. it makes you want to see what you know is wrong but never shows it:violence, nudity, etc. when the woman with the darker hair in this video calls the rewind part childish...ughhhh...she's an idiot. that scene shows that we want to see her fight back, to kill, in essence. it portrays just how real seeing someone being killed in a film is compared to real life. is one more hurtful than the other? is one more real than another? we still see it, right?
the movie is good but around when the guys leave the family to go get whatever they have to get, it does start to become boring. when they finally come back to kill the rest of the family it started to get good again.
this movie was so bad ass, i didnt make me feel uncomfortable like people said, it did make you wish someone might of livid but...it was totally worth it and i would see it again, i love it
Haneke is just another prude moralist, only instead of wearing the clothes of a religious zealot he wears the clothes of a secular liberal. I enjoy violence in film and I will continue to enjoy violence in film, and Haneke can wag his finger at me all he likes, but I really could care less what someone who's willing to film an actor actually killing an animal and put that footage in his film thinks of me.
Haneke strikes me as a closet sadist, anyway. All of his films are fixated on suffering.
TedGoranson69 1 week ago
lol @ at all the furious fanboy comments
SirMoebbelsKerr 2 weeks ago
I think Haneke tries to get rid of any redemption whatsoever towards violence in any film, since even in films where there´s no good guy or anything (and these are in my opinion the best ones) and after just having one hour and thirty minutes of slashin´and slicin´, we still can seat back and enjoy and watch the next film, this time with Bruce Willis, and forget about violence entirely
dvg87 3 weeks ago
The genius with the original Funny Games was that the violence was very much implied. It also forewent convention by having an interactive element with its audience to heighten the impact of the violence being perpetrated against the family. This remake was a totally unnecessary retread and felt more akin to a home invasion movie; rather than a commentary on people's complacency with violence in the mainstream.
fitzy098 1 month ago
fuck remakes.
kralle7611 2 months ago
@kralle7611 fuck Dawn of the Dead or the Hills have Eyes remake? Most are bad but Funny Games didn't do the original injustice
TheCandyHole 1 month ago
"and then when the really awful thing is happening you rewind it - Oh, grow up!" This woman is stupid ^^ -
There is all this torture and when finally, you see the killing and blood you have desired but not were able to see all the time in this movie - then it gets rewinded and the satisfaction derived from your own bloodlust for revenge is suddenly diminished! It is so pointless to make a movie unsatisfying like that - oh. grow up!
It worked as it should. You didnt notice it, little girl. ;)
korrekterelfer 3 months ago
@korrekterelfer
I've always been wanting to ask this of someone with your opinion:
What exactly is wrong with wanting those two murderous psychopaths to get blown away with a shotgun. Why does that qualify as "bloodlust for revenge", which is clearly a bad thing in your view.
Why? Why?
terratrema 3 months ago
Comment removed
jameslampert 4 months ago
Comment removed
jameslampert 4 months ago
FUCK OFF YOU RETARD REVIEWERS YOU DONT KNOW WHAT YOUR ON ABOUT THESE "PROFFESSIONAL REVIEWERS SUCK BALLS" THEY ALWAYS GO AGAINST THE PROPER FILM FANS THAT LOVE CINEMA FOR WHAT IT IS RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
gwain30 5 months ago
that one broad doesn't know shit. a 'daily mail film' my ass!
69fasterpussycat 6 months ago
As far as Horror films go this is one good film. very simple, Very Tense, Hardely any music. No glorifying violence, good use of the fourth wall! and a good twist aswell. This film is genius. A true horror film!!!!!
Matthew9818 6 months ago
Their very harsh on it I feal! this movie is very unique with the concept! And as far as horror films go this is a pretty horrifying idea! It,s not a fuking remake of benny,s video! and who wants to see a old woman stripped!
Matthew9818 6 months ago
Well, i think Funny Games U.S is uncomfortable viewing. I didn't see the original so i come without prejudice. I thought Naomi Watts was terrific, i disagree that she was miscast, it's almost as if the woman involved in this round table discussion review suggests that just because Naomi Watts has a great body, somehow that would be less humiliating. Oh yeh she's been naked in Mulholland Drive. Oh well that's really taken me out of the moment. You grow up!
axl77 6 months ago
HA! Funny Games a remake of Bennys Video.. No
MrTarpband 8 months ago
It might have been good if it was not boring.. The third act has to be the longest and most boring part in any movie ever.. No climax, no anything. Just watching the two main characters dick around with a phone and sitting. Not to mention all the long house, wall and floor shots. Yes this movie is realy good.. The intentions might have been intresting, but the product was shit.
Shardok1 8 months ago
Jesus that girl was brutal. I absolutely loved this movie. It was brilliant. I hate prissy critics that beat down a movie in comparison to other movies and this and that. It's a fantastic movie, take from it what you want. It's brilliant.
alexrempel12390 9 months ago
Violence is worthless? LOL, it's not. How naive it is to say that it is.
megalosauru 9 months ago
This review is bullshit, they dont even understand the film, or the points which every scene makes.
DropProps 10 months ago 3
I agree, Naomi really was not a good choice. She is a product of Hollywood, everything Haneke's films seem to be going against. Even her acting style seems completely out of place.
xoGorilla 11 months ago
Critics? They really don't have a clue. Seriously! Blah Blah Blah
bhoysinlisbon67 1 year ago
Mark Kermode's word was the only one that mattered in this circle. the rest had absolutely nothing to say.
Raymint 1 year ago
I think the purpose to Funny Games is one of the most obvious things ever and the way these people talk about it makes them come of quite unintelligently. Except that the dude with the red tie seems to try to level with it a little bit more than the others...
MajesticJac 1 year ago
WRONG... he didn't want to make an ENGLISH remake - he specifically wanted to make a U.S. remake since the whole idea of the movie is to show the absurdity of U.S. Horror films.
Supenmanu 1 year ago
one of the best horror,disturbing movies.......ever ever ever ever.....
TheYorker123 1 year ago
I don't agree with most of what was said here, however, they have an interesting position but incorrect.
mymarty23 1 year ago
I don't agree that it is "telling us off" for wanting to see violence... I thought it was meant to deliberately piss me off, by playing to my expectations of the genre... I literally punched the air when Naomi shot one of the guys... And then when it re-wound, I was very pissed off, and I think that was the whole point.
robwilko 1 year ago
Good lord these people are awful. Sooo awful.
OldPotion 1 year ago
Comment removed
OldPotion 1 year ago
these people dont know a good movie when they see it
zombiedude1411 1 year ago
Kermode is the only one talking sense
piggy978 1 year ago
Michael Haneke is a genius, but yes, his film aren't for everyone.
ScorseseKubrick 1 year ago
Honestly, I think these reviewers are entirely missing the point of the movie. I have never heard such vacuous comments. One woman in particular completely misunderstood what she was watching. Some people never learn. I for one thought the remake was well done and perfectly casted.
ReginaChick 2 years ago 4
The point of Funny Games is that it forces you to to address your relationship to movie violence: why is violence in a film only valid if it's thrilling or offers you some sort of redemption at the end? Funny Games gives you neither of these payoffs, so to call the film "senseless" is actually more of a compliment than an insult; it proves how effective the film is in delivering its central message: violence is worthless.
geezpleez 2 years ago 27
@geezpleez i disagree. Haneke makes his career from such films so to him are not worthless at all. The argument about whether violence is worthless or not is paradoxical. Someone always benefits whether it's the perpetrator or the filmmaker or even the audience if a lesson has been learnt.
mousehead2000 1 year ago
@mousehead2000 I see your point but you might be reading too much into my use of the word "worthless". It could be a poor choice of word from me, but I only meant that Haneke obviously thinks conventional attitudes to movie violence are either narrow-minded or just invalid (or having little "value"). This provocation or variations of it seems to be at the heart of all his films, so I would agree that he's made a career – and benefitted – from violence one way or another.
davidnguyen81 1 year ago
@geezpleez I couldn't stand the remake cuz you can't do better than the original, but to say it's in bad taste or has no redeeming value, what? I love how they talk about "the audience" -- i'm an author, I have never thought of any AUDIENCE, this is MINE - the reason this is so disturbing, the original and has profound EFFECT iis becasue it's SO REAL, no one gets saved, they don't kill the bad guys at the end, it shows you a realistic event that could happen in a real way, see, REAL IS SCARY
bobethe 1 year ago
@geezpleez
"Why is violence in a film only valid if it's thrilling or offers you some sort of redemption at the end?"
Because otherwise you end up with "Funny Games".
acousticology 10 months ago
@geezpleez But this isn't a new or interestingly delivered message. Kermode mentions Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, a much better film which also sees nothing titillating or "thrilling" about violence. The same is true of numerous horror films; it's simply not true that you can group "violent cinema" together as Haneke and the fans of Funny Games want to. It's a redundant lecture.
onearmkill 4 months ago
@geezpleez But there are plenty of films that raised the same themes in much more intelligent, subtle and original ways. So not only is it like being shouted at by Haneke for two hours, it's not even an original concept.
MrKeepitunderyourhat 1 month ago
Veru stupid to remake this film.
kanudoss 2 years ago 3
the whole idea of questioning our relationship to violence on screen or in the media is not a new idea. in fact, it's quite redundant really. And it's difficult for a film maker to pull it off without looking likea total hypocrite in the process.
the only Hanneke movie i really liked was The Piano Teacher.
lamentate07 2 years ago 2
One of the few intelligent comments in this inane sea of butthurt Haneke fanboy knee-jerking.
jonjonmcjonjon 2 years ago
I watched the original and was simply floored by its senselessness; perhaps the worst piece of shit I've ever seen. Commenting on violence and the media by making a film with endless shots of an inexplicable home invasion? The only thing the director did to combat violence was to make it ceaselessly boring
IantheLiberal 2 years ago
Comment removed
lamentate07 2 years ago
Go and watch Transformers you cunts.
Bigmac79 2 years ago
good comment.
iwillcontrolyourmind 2 years ago
Seconded! Do those guys talking actually consider themselves critics?
hymen0callis 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I hate these people.
PoltergeistOven 2 years ago
Why did i just watch this clip? It's utterly pointless. These people are just pratts! Haneke is GREAT!
slappymccrecken 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thank God, these people exposed this pretentious piece of crap for what it is!
bubbleraver 2 years ago
"like cache or like hidden"......?same thing mark
srjmaybank 2 years ago
"I don't want Michael Haneke telling me off for occasionally liking violent films..."
I don't watch it often, but this is probably one of the worst reviews I've seen on this show (Newsnight Review).
I haven't seen the American version, but I thought the German original was quite funny - well, mildly amusing... It's only uncomfortable if you actually enjoy watching gratuitously violent films, probably...
euclidxxx 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cbgb1204 2 years ago
Comment removed
Cbgb1204 2 years ago
that girl who was talking about naome naked is retarded
WankstaProductions 2 years ago 17
@WankstaProductions Agreed 100%
DavidGruwez 2 years ago
@WankstaProductions
I get what she was on about... when the guys are saying "i bet she has jelly-rolls", you can tell she won't have anyway.
robwilko 1 year ago
television trying to marginalize something so much greater than itself.
thedahmerkid 2 years ago
LVishere captures the sour taste left in my mouth by the bland looking lady PERFECTLY.
campLCS 2 years ago
i totally agree with most of the comments made here - what on earth is this show? Its very very embarrassing...the 'goth' lady should be ashamed of herself, id much prefer a show where there are actual critics on it.
PINUPEXTRA 2 years ago
Yeah, she has no idea what the film is about. She really needs to brush up on her skills at analyzing films.
bobjimtheawesome 2 years ago 2
Brilliant film, I don't recall being so shaken by a film and I'm grateful that it was able to do that
rossdamo 2 years ago
I always thought the movie depicted violence in ways we are unaccustomed to seeing. For instance it it rare to see a dog killed in a movie, let alone a kid. We expect them to pull through the situation and survive but the deaths were blunt inevitabilities we aren't used to seeing in movies. At least thats what I got out of it.
Termite700 2 years ago
Watts was cast because she is good, not because we can somehow avoid the fact we've seen her body before. That comment was ridiculous....and talk about miss the point. Once again, Kermode is the only person who really seems to know what he's saying
screwball82 2 years ago
I agree with that. This pseudo critic shows just how childish and brainwashed by todays media she is when she says that it would be more humiliating if someone fatter or older had to strip. It doesn't matter what we see, it just matters how it's done and that's what makes it humiliating.
I agree that this film is shocking and a bit of a torture. But why on earth should every film just be a beautiful hollywood movie. I think this torture is essential in order for us to learn something.
BeyondAbc 2 years ago
You hit the nail on the head. In thinking on it, what this woman says is actually quite offensive.....so somehow, it's not as humiliatiing to this person....because she's what we think of as "beautiful"??? It's like when someone dies and we say, "aww, so good looking too!"....like if they weren't, it wouldn't be tragic??
screwball82 2 years ago 2
they're missing the whole point of the movie, you're not supposed to ask yourself "why are you watching THIS violente movie?", but "why are you watching violent movies in general?"
The only difference between Funny Games and other violent movies is that Haneke's movie doesn't show violence as entertaining, beautiful or desirable
ivdsc1 2 years ago
You all sound like idiots while talking about this film.
RocknRollErickStoll 2 years ago
fuck you.
LVishere 2 years ago
Goth lady is dumb
Her criticism, senseless
Should stick to goth stuff
Benesyed 2 years ago
"grow up" and "gutless", said the rather gutless and oh, quite so petulant movie critic.
Undiddley 2 years ago
wow that chick is such a downer
i bet shes a feminist
WeThinkWeRFast 2 years ago
Funny Games was royally screwed by the "proffesional" movie critics, why?
jeffreed04 3 years ago 3
These kinds of people were the reason why this movie bombed in the box office. Furthermore, these people were the reason why so few people have even heard of Funny Games. Who cares that it was remade shot for shot, I don't. Actually, now that it has been shot in the English language I can focus on the entire environment within each scene, subtitles be damned. It's one thing to not like the movie because it is so disturbing, but that shouldn't scew their opinion on the quality of the film.
jeffreed04 3 years ago
douche bags thatmovie is good...dicks...i dont like that chick she's a bitch
emilythe11emo 3 years ago
I must say that I wasn't a fan of this movie, but only because it was advertized as a popcorn thriller of the late 00s. In terms of its taboo of breaking cimeatographic rules (breaking the 4th wall), its point works well - but a lesson is learned here...
If you break teh rules, don't expect the mass audience to understand it, because they're going to the movies for entertainment, not moral questioning.
hellview666 3 years ago 4
i agree, but mass audience needs to get slapped once in a while
ivdsc1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i duno why there making it sound good
it was an awful movie
xThisxCharmingxManx 3 years ago
these people are prats! i don't think it was a great idea for haneke to remake the film, but these idiots don't know what they were watching.
drgeckokid 3 years ago
Seriously worthless opinions.
sewerface 3 years ago
Its really funny to me how this film is discussed. The core of the film is an attack on the system of violence in bourgeoise society (basically our western world). It's concrete little devices of alienation (turning to the camera, etc.) are really, in my opinion, ways to shift the film from being simply an indulgent entertainment of cathartic violence. It implicates the system of contemp "egalitarian" attitudes (which hide class), proposing that subtle or not violence is just below the surface.
TasteMouth 3 years ago
Ratings disabled? I wonder why... oh yeah, because these people don't know what they're talking about and this video deserves 0 stars. There isn't even someone there to counter argue with them! They're all just upset cause they didn't get their fix of senseless, no message violence...
sylvainthefrenchman 3 years ago
Ratings are now possible - knock yourself out ;-)
manwithaplan999 3 years ago 4
Sweet... kudos for putting ratings back. I'll give a star cause the critics' accents almost made them sound convincing, haha.
sylvainthefrenchman 3 years ago
@sylvainthefrenchman the whole point of the movie was to make the audience FEEL like they are an accomplice in a MURDER!!! He wanted the film to be uncomfortable and he wanted to make this to make torture porn movies look bad. He succeeded.
HALEterSkelter 1 year ago 3
@sylvainthefrenchman funny games does have a meaning
jacktalbot 1 year ago
@jacktalbot I didn't say funny games didn't have a meaning.
I said the critiques in that show were upset that the film didn't have any meaningless violence.
Read carefully before posting.
sylvainthefrenchman 1 year ago
@sylvainthefrenchman duly noted
jacktalbot 1 year ago
@sylvainthefrenchman Oh man sh...... u.....!
Affenzunge 7 months ago
@sylvainthefrenchman
The guy wearing a tie understands it. And is aware that the others there dont. Discussion is useless. Either you get it or you are too frightened to accept what it is telling you. He is totally right when he says that people able to understand it would have been satisfied with seeing the original already. The brunette is the opposite, furiously whining about naivity she sees in it - confronted with her own immaturity in watching violence. She just doesnt want to accept it
korrekterelfer 3 months ago
Fuck these people are stupid, they don't understand it at all.
Velvetrevolver1993 3 years ago
Jesus, that woman is a moron! You don't choose Watts based on her looks, you choose her because......oh that's right, she's great! At least Mark isn't a complete idiot and looks at it constructively
screwball82 3 years ago
these people suck, this movie is brilliant
madcrazydopeson 3 years ago 3
The only thing I agree with is the casting. They're all considerably weaker than Arno Frisch, the late Ulrich Muhe, etc. And although I see what Kermode is saying vis a vis Haneke going backwards but I still think the film is brilliant no matter what language it's in. You're not supposed to enjoy it, that's not the point. Haneke wants to turn us on to our own bloodlust in films and how desensitized it has made us. That is the essence of Funny Games.
TulseLuper 3 years ago
I liked this movie, it was so disturbing without a lot of gore. It doesn't fall in the "torture porn" category like lot of movies do nowadays. Some scenes that people found "Boooring" i think you missed the whole point of the movie. That's my opinion now if you don't like it the go watch some torture porn :)
TheGreenHillZone 3 years ago
you\r a terrible choice
trexonian 3 years ago
I still love how it makes you feel like you're part of the movie. It's almost like it's fun to watch but disturbing at the same time.
gothtigger92 3 years ago
"this is just an exploitation film." wow, british people are fucking useless.
iaresloth 3 years ago
I'm sorry but what gives you the right to stereotype a whole country (yes, my country) just because of someone elses opinion? I'm British and I thought this film was awesome.
moonshiner00 3 years ago 2
the sickening fact that ANYONE actually finds this "movie" entertaining is a comment on the hopelessness of humanity.that we are FUCKED UP enough to allow this excrement as anything but an alqeida or C.I.A. training film is proof of our foolishness and inhumanity.eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow--we DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
gyptqaz 3 years ago
You are a fool imo. This movie does not actually show any violence except for blood stains and if any thing its a psychological torture film.
Also, the entertainment is not in the torture but the characters actions. Watching people pushed to there limits and then some.
Imo this movie was boring with absolutely NO payoff at the end. There were a couple of funny/tense moments like when they stare at the screen but over all it was a movie with a message and no pay off.
To bad...
HVPinc 3 years ago
sarajoyx: "also saddening that you didn't actually SEE anyone die.."
Wow, I guess that kind of proves the movie's point right there.
jjfyke 3 years ago 2
First of all allow me to get my childish side out the way, What a bunch of fucking cunts! How can they sit there on what looks like a tacky Trisha set and discuss movies as if they are the fucking gods of it. Question...Is it three men or two, I got confused?
The film, in my opinion, was just a version for those sad, uneducated humans that can not, or just simply can't function or understand subtitles. The film was amazing, I am not saying anymore because I don't want to.
vianello185 3 years ago
I love both even the remake is basically same movie.
kblixt 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The ending should have been..After Naomi is thrown into the river,the camera goes to Tim roth who is still barely alive and manages to get the remote as he spits out blood.He then rewinds to the part when Tubby asks for eggs.Tim then comes from nowhere with a golfclub and beats the two weirdos to death .Thus preventing the massacre.When Naomi asks why he did it Tim winks at camera and the credits roll..Whaddya think!!
boybandmassacre 3 years ago
It is a really good idea, but I guess it would have ruined Michael Haneke's whole point to the film.
moonshiner00 3 years ago
now this movie was good i loved the ending. Spoiler alert, how at the end he goes up to the people and he says could you help us out with some eggs. Another part i liked was that there wasn't actually alot of music in the movie to give it's terror there was like one screaming song i don't no the name but it was kind of like no country for old men which is my favourite coen brothers movie.
lukepalmer8 3 years ago
this movie is awesome!! the thing is that there's no need to see the deaths, just because you can imagine it, I mean the terrifying of this movie is the premonition of somenthing bad that it's going to happen but you don't get to see it, it just terrifies you during all the film!! amazing, I left the cinema with my friends horrified and fascinated at the same time!
Joyhal23 3 years ago 2
sarajoyx
you mostly just proved Michael Haneke's point by your comment
when ann picks up the shotgun and shots peter...the audience feels relief and happiness that finally the good guys got back at the bad guys...but when paul picks the remote up and rewinds, that just shows the audience that the way they want the movie to go is not going to happen and there is not a happy ending...
sarajoyx...you are very close minded and this film was most likely not for you...
johnnysrusso 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
eh.. the movie wasn't good at all, i REALLY hated the remote rewind sceen and even moreso hated the looking into the camera and talking to the movie watchers bit even more.. but the PLOT and IDEA of the movie is AWESOME. also saddening that you didn't actually SEE anyone die..
sarajoyx 3 years ago
It's so nice to see unsuccessful filmmake...oops sorry I mean film critics cast away something they don't understand simply for the reason they don't understand it. Applauds are in order!
thehillproduction 3 years ago
Glad to hear that the majority of people here can recognise the genius that is haneke unlike the wannabe intellects in the clip. long live haneke!.. lol
skardar1 3 years ago
That is, wannabe "intellectuals", rather than intellects. Shame you have not been endowed with the same prodigious ability in grammar that you have in film analysis.
BakedWalnut 3 years ago
Thank you for your correction and please do not hesistate to correct any other mistakes in my grammar if this is what fulfills you.
skardar1 3 years ago
Aw shucks, thanks a bunch...:D
BakedWalnut 3 years ago
Funny Games was amazing. These people suck dick.
CentipedeSisters 3 years ago
Haneke's work has always been misinterpreted, in my opinion. I didn't feel that Funny Games was criticizing the horror loving audience. The fact that this movie holds so much tension ,and respect for what makes good horror good, proves that he is a horror fan himself. But what he may have actually tried to do was make us simply question our separation of what we want from reality and what we want from film. Otherwise, we may become manipulated by film to make buffoonish decisions.
GetintheBag32 3 years ago 3
that woman with the red hair is the usual pseudo intellectual spouting nonsense
haasxaar 3 years ago 3
Fuck them. They seriously have no clue what there talking about. Close-minded hacks. Its like making a show about the moon landing, and then saying "Wasnt it fake?" "Oh yeah, because the flag is blowing and blah blah". They seriously have no clue. AT ALL.
PrestoKey 3 years ago
TOTAL WANKERS! they would`t recognize a good movie even if it hit them in there heads.
siempreviva 3 years ago
Benny video is a great movie,btw.the fact you turned it off proves how much effect it had on you.Some people can't handle too much due to their psychosomatic constitution.
skutari 3 years ago
students,you guys amuse me no end..
boybandmassacre 3 years ago
Oh no! Students look out, Paul Calf is about!
MintySpunkBubble 3 years ago
Funny games is meant to show us that we are totally sensitized to violence in cinema.By shoving our face into a real torture scenario(which happens every day through rape,murders and tortures) we get to see what violence actually represents.Noble in a way but I feel all it does is condescend movie makers(we're not stupid) and give columbine worshipping sucicidal fucked up brats ideas.
Better than Bennys video though which I turned off out of disgust.
boybandmassacre2 3 years ago
I must admit I'm intrigued by the film's premise, and having loved "Hidden" would be willing to give it a go, however Kermode's arguments are often very convincing...
BakedWalnut 3 years ago
The woman with the red hair and british looking guy next to her are the biggest morons i ever heard.Go get a job as a clerk,don't waste your time with something you can't understand!!!
skutari 3 years ago
I can't say I was a fan, it seems a little draconic and questionable to make an entire based upon the assumption that you've never questioned your enjoyement of voilence in the media, frankly it seems unfair that i had to watch a film who's purpose was largely obsolete in anyone who activly considers their own actions. The re-wind scene and the breaches in forth wall didnt help since it ironicly gave it a sense of unreality which is the opposite of what the film was going for.
angrydead 3 years ago
L'un des 3 plus grand film de toute l'histoire du cinéma. L'adequation parfaite de la forme et du fond. Magnifique.
rykkominutesoup 3 years ago
I saw this film last Saturday and went into the cinema with no pre conceptions about what it would be like. I thought it was a pretty good film. Rather refreshing to have a bad ass ending where no one goes skipping off into the sunset. 2 couples actually walked out halfway through the film whispering 'This is Shit!' Basically they couldnt handle it!
mannyposh 3 years ago 2
i thot FG was absolutely stunning. i just hope the re-make doesnt destroyed the original masterpiece.
kockykunt 3 years ago
it's not in any theater here in new york.
wolfgar45 3 years ago
why are they laughing at guy ritchie? is he not talented?
bashthebandello 3 years ago
"why are they laughing at guy ritchie? is he not talented?"
excellent
Razstar 3 years ago
The original is amazing and I'm quite anxious for this american version! As for this video, the red haired lady should work on her dictation, and find another job since it seems she just sayd the stupidest things you could ever hear regarding the movie and the whole subject!
bbjunho 3 years ago
I really liked this film, and I'm starting to think I might be the only one, hah...
twoheadedboi 3 years ago
GhostManOnSixtieth
you are dead on. thank you. finally someone who has the same opinions as me on this movie.
brettjm3 3 years ago
this movie targets the human mind's wickedness. it makes you want to see what you know is wrong but never shows it:violence, nudity, etc. when the woman with the darker hair in this video calls the rewind part childish...ughhhh...she's an idiot. that scene shows that we want to see her fight back, to kill, in essence. it portrays just how real seeing someone being killed in a film is compared to real life. is one more hurtful than the other? is one more real than another? we still see it, right?
GhostManOnSixtieth 3 years ago 4
the movie is good but around when the guys leave the family to go get whatever they have to get, it does start to become boring. when they finally come back to kill the rest of the family it started to get good again.
HaydenCWillBeMine 3 years ago
this movie was so bad ass, i didnt make me feel uncomfortable like people said, it did make you wish someone might of livid but...it was totally worth it and i would see it again, i love it
EnterKip 3 years ago 2
superb movie
dionne0114 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Trailer is genius. Movie is garbage. Just awful!!!! Torture to watch-- and not in the way Haneke intended!
purelypolyester 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
top 3 worst movies i've ever seen
#3 The Wild
#2 The Hulk
#1 Funny Games
TheShadyPenguin 3 years ago
The film's meant to piss you off.
shug6009 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
movie is garbage...dont say i didnt warn you!
kingizo 3 years ago
looks like a pretty good movie i wanna see it
nobodycares345 3 years ago