Water won't burn under the right circumstances. All baloney. But if there is enough heat in the cylinder water can be expanded to get some pressure but not much pressure.
Usually the engine drops power proportional to the amount of air fuel mixture ingested by the cylinder. Learn to drive carefully to get the same result.
is this guy stil alive? if so not for long... run mate, print plans of your ideas and try get it done but if that doenst work RUN. get the fuck out thea before you become the next "mysterious death".
The water could not add any more weight than a passenger but the passenger could not fart enough methane to offset fuel economy. Neither does separating atoms. The energy used in separating is not gotten back by burning the hydrogen. will always be in negative flux otherwise you would have a perpetuation. Impossible according to Einstein.
It's all to do with vested interests, the oil companies can't charge for it and governments can't tax water. They may change when we are all about to breath our last breath of fresh air, then it will be too late were on the same path as the preverbal Lemmings.
Here's a quick way to increase fuel efficiency, have you noticed how much better the engine of your vehicle run when it damp or raining No? well it does. Put a wick in the air intake and the other end in water container... cheap and easy
AT THE TURN OF LAST CENTURY THEY WERE MORE ELECTRIC CARS ON THE ROAD THAN FUEL CARS AND THEN THE ELECTRIC STATER WAS INVENTED AND GRADUALLY OVER A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME ELECTRIC CARS DISAPPEARED OFF THE ROAD IT'S TO BAD THE OIL COMPANY OF THAT DAY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE BUT THEIR MONIES JUST LIKE TODAY
IT NOT SAID HOWEVER IT AN EVIL DEED TO LOVE MONEY ABOVE ALL ELSE AND THAT'S WHAT THE OIL ELITES AND THE GOV WHO IS IN BED WITH THEM AND MANY OTHERS ARE DOING AND THE GOOD LORD WILL RECTIFY THIS SITUATION UPON HIS RETURN PRAY FOR THEM CONTINUALLY BECAUSE THEY FOLLOW SATAN AND HIS WAYS WHICH IS TO DESTROY MANKIND
2. Conservation of Energy - If they are separating hydrogen and oxygen in that car they are using MORE energy to do that as they are getting by burning it in the ICE.
This is such a bad idea. The worlds economy would collapse. Gasoline/Petrol makes the world go around and without it, we're all out of jobs. Of course, this is why we don't have these cars today. Watch "Who killed the electric car"
how could the weight of 20 liters of water be anymore of a reduction in fuel efficiency then say..... PASSENGERS? What if he modified his gas tank into two separate tanks? One for water & One for Gas. This wouldn't weigh any more than it did originally. Some people are unable to accept that what they have been told all of their lives could possibly be a lie.
1:45-1:52 "Well you won't necessarily be getting much fuel economy because you have to carry all the water, the water is adding extra weight" That guy is a complete F ing Moron. You are carrying Fuel in the first place aren't you? The weight different will be virtually nothing, you are replacing gas weight with water weight.
Only reason that things like this don't take off is because the Oil Corporations control to governments and don't allow this kind of SIMPLE technology to make it public.
I invented a breakthrough source of energy that contradicts the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that contradict the law of conservation of energy. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
When Carter was in office, They announced an energy day to help come up with ideas to find answers for the energy crisis. Two small american cars were converted [by individuals] and although I am pretty sure they wouldn't pass emissions test, they each got over 60 mpg. In 1965 a V W got 32 mph, what progress.
The U S is eighth in the world with wind power. Although we have plains, shorelines, mountains etc. Brazil used to be 80% dependent on oil. They now turn sigarcane into alcohol and are 80% self reliant. I worked in an oil refinery for over twenty years. They do not want another energy source, especially now with the economy like it is. Just tell texico, Sorry you lost your 80 billion a year business, I'm sure they won't mind.
No, they wouldn't mind that at all would they; only that they've just been spending billions of dollars on a war which happens to secure a major pipe line. What you're asking is could they please turn their high-profiteering global corporation into a publicly owned charity. No, they wouldn't mind that at all would they, muppet.
water is recycled not used up or wasted, dumbass it's ppl like you who have prevented the great change we need oil is a lost cause and a far outdated fuel source
what are you talking about? who said anything about recapturing it? it's released back into the environment as it is recycled into the atoms which have been converted to single molecules rather than combined as water, nothing is wasted. later they will naturally join again together to become water, for example when it rains, and the water will be there again.
why the hell not? it's just water, when it rains it happens all the time, some places that rain frequently like San Francisco or Seattle get huge amounts of rain water, and if you consider places like the south where there is hurricanes and such it's a ton of water. why would you rather destroy the planet and ruin everything out of shear incompliance to accept change? There is nothing positive about using gasoline. Globally we need to come together and change it, who cares about all the MONEY!
We had electric cars that were mass produced and yet not sold. They were leased out and then taken back... and then destroyed. It's not only the oil companies but our government that is holding us back from having such great products... its sad.
@BuRninsh wth are you talking about? y does this have anything to do with my comment about how our government and oil companies are holding us back from having cars powered by anything other than oil?
and as far as i know.... both my oil and water ARE TAXED ... so i reallllllly dont get your comment at all
@mikethecollector Im giving you 1 reason why government is not interested in cars which run on water, because they want to generate revenue from your movement by taxing oil, and running they're bureaucracy. And how can you tax water ? what can stop me from going to next river and filling up my tank or use generators which collect water from air. So its all about independence once you become self sufficient you dont need government no more . Thats what the fuck im talking about !
@BuRninsh that makes alot more sense, thank you lol.
all forms of clean water where I live is taxed tho, but obtaining water or generating it in other ways wouldn't be, so I can see how u could get water without paying a tax on it.
Nothing special about it. It's common in some application to inject water in a thermal machine, due to the rapid expantion of water you can improve the efficiency of an engine. An example: during takeoff the B52 bomber injects water in the reactors to cool them down and have an extra boost.
That is exactly what I thought when I first heard about this method. There is absolutely no combustion of water - Only the petroleum combusts whilst the water (steam) acts as a catalyst. The exothermic reaction of the fuel in a cylender creates a semi proportional endothermic reaction in the steam (causing the steam to also disperse).
you realize that if you burn water you get steam right? And then that goes into the sky and rains back down. Its 4th grade shit, dumbass. You don't run out of water because you burn it. thats why its called RE-NEWABLE ENERGY. dip-shit.
@0ddba11s The car doesn't run only on water, it runs with a mixture of petrol and water. So he fills the car up with a full tank of petrol, then adds 20 liters of water to the petrol, resulting in the "extra weight of the water".
@jeremylew416 My point is water and petrol are near enough the same weight so why does that dummy make a stupid comment about having to carry a boot full of water not being economical. If the water gives you the same mileage as the same amount of petrol would then he made a stupid comment. Hence why I have a 6 against my comment now!
@jeremylew416 My point is water and petrol are near enough the same weight so why does that dummy make a stupid comment about having to carry a boot full of water not being economical. If the water gives you the same mileage as the same amount of petrol would then he made a stupid comment. Hence why I have a 6 against my comment now!
As said the 20L of water adds 300 K to his normal 400K. 1 Imperial Gallon (UK) = 4.54609188 litres, so 4.4 gallons of water gives 300K try get that with petrol.
@0ddba11s litre of petrol- aprox. .72kg litre of water- 1kg
so about 28% heavier than petrol, thats why gas floats on water, it is an oil. Take a cup of petrol, and a cup of water and mix them in a cup- the petrol will rise very fast to the top. Thats why when you put water in someone's gas tank it messes up the engine, because the water sinks to the bottom of the tank and the engine attempts to combust the water, resulting in a number of mechanical problems.
@a4d2d0 Yes true I did know I thought of that after I posted it hence why a oil slick floats out at sea, but nothing significant in this case it was still a stupid comment by that guy.
@0ddba11s it is cuz if u mixt water with petrol ,the petrol stains will go to surface of water.and i think they mean the extra equipment not the water itself...
@0ddba11s Since water is water. Water density is (average) 1.0 g per cubic cm, gasoline is 0.73 g. That means 50L of water weights 50 KG, 50L of gasoline around 36.5 KG... Water is heavier as usual.
@0ddba11s what they meant was that there is added weight to the car since you have the weight of the petrol and the weight of the water as well. the guy did not modify the car to only burn HHO, but instead an HHO and petrol mixture, therefore he would have to load up on both and have the combined weight on the vehicle itself
did you guys see that reporter for magazine!"all the water extra weight", what a moron for extra 20 lts in your car to get 700 km on slyline is amazing. he looks like his extra weight ! good job skyline . 300 kms extra for 20 ltrs of water .
The world got 70% of water u faggot, just 1% of water is sweet water and 99% salt water which u can both use in this car! This tegnology is the future of cars!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
WHAT????? OK?? What are we going to do when we run out of water???? Thats what GA problem is now. NO water, no gas..what the hell is this world coming to??
Slipstream0001 is correct. The rest of you are really the morons.
The greenhouse effect is accounted by 98% water vapor. The rest is by CO2 and other gases. Do a search and you'll find it plain as day.
The problem is that even if humans started using water-powered cars (which is still BS, this one runs on a petrol/h20 mixture), we'd contribute maybe 1% to the greenhouse effect via water vapor.
The earth naturally produces the water vapor at a rate which humans have no control over. Research it.
hahaha that bloke that says about the weight must work for an oil company.. if it gets 400 kms to a tank on petrol an about 700 with the water... isnt that a gain anyhow? thats nearly double the kms , so if you added 20 kg to your regular car would it cut the mileage in half... i doubt it. i say winner! woop woop!
Oops my bad... I did say it was worse... I take that back, 'cos I know fuck all about the environment, just like you amateur scientists... google it - water vapour contributes a huge amount more than Co2
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I think water vapour is actually worse for the environment (global warming) than co2 but then again he's saving alot on petrol. Lol at the nerdy dude at the end. I wonder if Graeme likes fush and chups.
when injected in a fine mist into the combustion process it can reduce detonation and burn cleaner, especially with forced induction. water is injected and correlated according to intake manifold pressure.
It's an R33 GTS (not GTS25 or GTS25t) with a factory equipped RB20E, which is a 2.0L SOHC 6Cyl (like the R31 and VL RB30E, but 2.0L). Possibly the most ghetto Skyline ever made.
Water won't burn under the right circumstances. All baloney. But if there is enough heat in the cylinder water can be expanded to get some pressure but not much pressure.
Usually the engine drops power proportional to the amount of air fuel mixture ingested by the cylinder. Learn to drive carefully to get the same result.
hieffengine 3 months ago
is this guy stil alive? if so not for long... run mate, print plans of your ideas and try get it done but if that doenst work RUN. get the fuck out thea before you become the next "mysterious death".
SprntrlDeathNinja 5 months ago
RB30E engine on water, i thought those skylines came with RB20DET's
REPOMAN24722 5 months ago
The water could not add any more weight than a passenger but the passenger could not fart enough methane to offset fuel economy. Neither does separating atoms. The energy used in separating is not gotten back by burning the hydrogen. will always be in negative flux otherwise you would have a perpetuation. Impossible according to Einstein.
ironhead1969 5 months ago
1:27 what a badass. no body fuck with him k
Aaronx3Sally 5 months ago
Its funny that i see a caltex advert while waiting for this too load
stan1da1man 6 months ago
It's all to do with vested interests, the oil companies can't charge for it and governments can't tax water. They may change when we are all about to breath our last breath of fresh air, then it will be too late were on the same path as the preverbal Lemmings.
Here's a quick way to increase fuel efficiency, have you noticed how much better the engine of your vehicle run when it damp or raining No? well it does. Put a wick in the air intake and the other end in water container... cheap and easy
1stMrSceptical 6 months ago
AT THE TURN OF LAST CENTURY THEY WERE MORE ELECTRIC CARS ON THE ROAD THAN FUEL CARS AND THEN THE ELECTRIC STATER WAS INVENTED AND GRADUALLY OVER A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME ELECTRIC CARS DISAPPEARED OFF THE ROAD IT'S TO BAD THE OIL COMPANY OF THAT DAY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE BUT THEIR MONIES JUST LIKE TODAY
roberetrodgers 7 months ago
IT NOT SAID HOWEVER IT AN EVIL DEED TO LOVE MONEY ABOVE ALL ELSE AND THAT'S WHAT THE OIL ELITES AND THE GOV WHO IS IN BED WITH THEM AND MANY OTHERS ARE DOING AND THE GOOD LORD WILL RECTIFY THIS SITUATION UPON HIS RETURN PRAY FOR THEM CONTINUALLY BECAUSE THEY FOLLOW SATAN AND HIS WAYS WHICH IS TO DESTROY MANKIND
roberetrodgers 7 months ago
What a muppet, the vapour out of the exhaust is caused by his cylinder head gasket failure.
You can fool some of the people some of the time etc etc etc
caesarspad 9 months ago
1. R33 Skylines never used an RB30
2. Conservation of Energy - If they are separating hydrogen and oxygen in that car they are using MORE energy to do that as they are getting by burning it in the ICE.
JackOfJudges 1 year ago
@JackOfJudges ever think that he just got an rb30 engine and put it in his r33 ?
JusHere2PostComments 11 months ago
why not just run on water. Friggn dumbass
butler1000642 1 year ago
This is such a bad idea. The worlds economy would collapse. Gasoline/Petrol makes the world go around and without it, we're all out of jobs. Of course, this is why we don't have these cars today. Watch "Who killed the electric car"
Tyehao 1 year ago
how could the weight of 20 liters of water be anymore of a reduction in fuel efficiency then say..... PASSENGERS? What if he modified his gas tank into two separate tanks? One for water & One for Gas. This wouldn't weigh any more than it did originally. Some people are unable to accept that what they have been told all of their lives could possibly be a lie.
HHO4ALL 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The big Oil corporations are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common ppl.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating your own electricity now.
Visit LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints . Join the Revolution!!
perplexfraction 1 year ago
who have the schematics of this system?
SpeedMetal4635 1 year ago
imagine a buggati veyron powered with water vroooom smoke embarrassing
Jazzfather1 1 year ago
1:45-1:52 "Well you won't necessarily be getting much fuel economy because you have to carry all the water, the water is adding extra weight" That guy is a complete F ing Moron. You are carrying Fuel in the first place aren't you? The weight different will be virtually nothing, you are replacing gas weight with water weight.
Only reason that things like this don't take off is because the Oil Corporations control to governments and don't allow this kind of SIMPLE technology to make it public.
TurboCarsOnly 1 year ago
the car does not run on water it runs on hydrogen
hahocrf50 1 year ago 2
yeah damn that water makes it have worse fuel economy hmm 400+ on petrol and 20 lt of water and get 700+ yep worse fuel economy stupid critics
ravenwind123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dude take it off it's a scam if you dont beleive me see a1mint channel, he is an actual scientist
snowman3514 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry. Water is oxidation product like ash. To make fuel from ash or water You need more energy then contains estabilished fuel.
Another way You can make perpetum mobile.
Please go to Your old school physics teacher and say him that he is working at wrong place.
Why can man sell "10 dollar water energy fuel cells" only in US?
TilkRaivo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have 4 e-books that show how to convert your car to run on HHO and how to make the set-up. You can download them free at
mediafire. com/file/zz2zillim3j/Run your car on water Ebooks.zip
Casper3417 1 year ago
Water IS heavier than Petrol (1lt water is 1kg, 1Lt petrol is between 750-800grams depending on its specific gravity)
l28power 1 year ago
@l28power even so would you rather run on water or petrol?
chinhhhhh 1 year ago
Comment removed
FromerCromerBromer 1 year ago
How would this run like on something like my skyline it burns heaps of fuel
kelvinjsteiner 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough source of energy that contradicts the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that contradict the law of conservation of energy. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
a steam train!!! i like this skyline
gerb360 1 year ago
hahaha the media always have to have an ignorant critic in there with some garbage reason for why it won't work....
"have to carry more weight because of the water" hahaha what a genius
searcherofdatruth 2 years ago
yeah RB all the way!
doughnutriot 2 years ago
couldn't hear the important stuff due to the music.
fems2112 2 years ago
SCAMMMMMM
sephiroth671 2 years ago
yea go NZ!
meringu 2 years ago
hahah, those fumes must be tasty
ponchoyo 2 years ago
"it still burns gas, but I'll drink these toxic fumes anyway"
nikunter 2 years ago 3
now add a turbocharger
chasa8 2 years ago
the queer critic sed u hav 2 carry water everywhere i wonder if he knows therz such thin called taps stupid cunt
iripovau 2 years ago
@iripovau and what would you do with the tap? fill up a container in the car probably?
guyontheend 2 years ago
great idea.. what a wanker critic saying 20lt of water is gunna make u loose fuel acconormey wat about all the fat blokes out there
urbanrb30power 2 years ago
if your interested in how to run your car on water and gasoline mix as per this video then the plans are available at: ecozone(dot)net(dot)nz
awakekiwi 2 years ago
When Carter was in office, They announced an energy day to help come up with ideas to find answers for the energy crisis. Two small american cars were converted [by individuals] and although I am pretty sure they wouldn't pass emissions test, they each got over 60 mpg. In 1965 a V W got 32 mph, what progress.
wildnwolfy 2 years ago
The U S is eighth in the world with wind power. Although we have plains, shorelines, mountains etc. Brazil used to be 80% dependent on oil. They now turn sigarcane into alcohol and are 80% self reliant. I worked in an oil refinery for over twenty years. They do not want another energy source, especially now with the economy like it is. Just tell texico, Sorry you lost your 80 billion a year business, I'm sure they won't mind.
wildnwolfy 2 years ago
Hilarious. Another fraud. Hooray!
somedudeinva 2 years ago
Google: automotive x-prize
There is a $10 million reward for a fuel efficient car. Registration is closed, but
you can click on the online form link and tell them you have technology to contribute. Let us know how it goes
talos1964 3 years ago
Hey, why would the oil companies not want a new energy source?, Sure they would lose countless billions, but they wouldn't mind that, would they?
foka24a4 3 years ago
No, they wouldn't mind that at all would they; only that they've just been spending billions of dollars on a war which happens to secure a major pipe line. What you're asking is could they please turn their high-profiteering global corporation into a publicly owned charity. No, they wouldn't mind that at all would they, muppet.
warlock242 2 years ago
we are fuckin dump we like oil!!!!!
mufasa10811 3 years ago
Great, now we'll run out of water.
gat6000 3 years ago
water is recycled not used up or wasted, dumbass it's ppl like you who have prevented the great change we need oil is a lost cause and a far outdated fuel source
otakukj 3 years ago
Explain how they recapture the same water when it is burned in the engine and spit out the tailpipe~
razorx71 3 years ago
what are you talking about? who said anything about recapturing it? it's released back into the environment as it is recycled into the atoms which have been converted to single molecules rather than combined as water, nothing is wasted. later they will naturally join again together to become water, for example when it rains, and the water will be there again.
otakukj 3 years ago 2
So you wanna just dump hundreds of thousands of gallons of water a day on each mile of the interstates? Doesn't sound like a very good idea.
razorx71 3 years ago
why the hell not? it's just water, when it rains it happens all the time, some places that rain frequently like San Francisco or Seattle get huge amounts of rain water, and if you consider places like the south where there is hurricanes and such it's a ton of water. why would you rather destroy the planet and ruin everything out of shear incompliance to accept change? There is nothing positive about using gasoline. Globally we need to come together and change it, who cares about all the MONEY!
otakukj 3 years ago
must be gutless as fuck
fein06 3 years ago
cheers!
nardpuppy 3 years ago
Its not a rb30 lol.. its a rb20e look at the intake plenum and rocker cover. If you dont think so... google it :)
calaisturbo6 3 years ago 2
Hmm why isnt this being mass produced in the States? lol F&^$king oil companies.....
s7ryk3r1337 3 years ago 3
We had electric cars that were mass produced and yet not sold. They were leased out and then taken back... and then destroyed. It's not only the oil companies but our government that is holding us back from having such great products... its sad.
mikethecollector 3 years ago 17
@mikethecollector because you cant put TAX on oil but you cant TAX a water
BuRninsh 1 year ago
@BuRninsh wth are you talking about? y does this have anything to do with my comment about how our government and oil companies are holding us back from having cars powered by anything other than oil?
and as far as i know.... both my oil and water ARE TAXED ... so i reallllllly dont get your comment at all
mikethecollector 1 year ago
@mikethecollector Im giving you 1 reason why government is not interested in cars which run on water, because they want to generate revenue from your movement by taxing oil, and running they're bureaucracy. And how can you tax water ? what can stop me from going to next river and filling up my tank or use generators which collect water from air. So its all about independence once you become self sufficient you dont need government no more . Thats what the fuck im talking about !
BuRninsh 1 year ago
@BuRninsh that makes alot more sense, thank you lol.
all forms of clean water where I live is taxed tho, but obtaining water or generating it in other ways wouldn't be, so I can see how u could get water without paying a tax on it.
mikethecollector 1 year ago
my car runs on semen
hector62892 3 years ago
mines runs on shit.
gemsyjoe 3 years ago 2
not to different to the water made by your catalytic converter. alot of oem is not using high quaility stainless in there exhausts.
mightygood1 3 years ago
Can anyone spell "rusty exhaust"?
TheFlygt 3 years ago
stainless steel
hector62892 3 years ago 5
POOR RB30
nitrousboy0311 3 years ago
umm. It doesn't inject water. it injects hydrogen and oxygen.
mightygood1 3 years ago
Nothing special about it. It's common in some application to inject water in a thermal machine, due to the rapid expantion of water you can improve the efficiency of an engine. An example: during takeoff the B52 bomber injects water in the reactors to cool them down and have an extra boost.
x969536 3 years ago
That is exactly what I thought when I first heard about this method. There is absolutely no combustion of water - Only the petroleum combusts whilst the water (steam) acts as a catalyst. The exothermic reaction of the fuel in a cylender creates a semi proportional endothermic reaction in the steam (causing the steam to also disperse).
scrfce123 3 years ago
I believe you need to do some research. Next time try not to be a fool.
mightygood1 3 years ago
Hahahah XD
TheFlygt 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thats the dumbest idea on earth.
Water isn't compressible, and when it collects in the cylinder you break your engine.
mustangified 3 years ago
you must be the dumbest redneck on earth. well your youtoebnick says enough.
robbedoes1985 3 years ago
the car runs off ass milk
saleem83 3 years ago
you realize that if you burn water you get steam right? And then that goes into the sky and rains back down. Its 4th grade shit, dumbass. You don't run out of water because you burn it. thats why its called RE-NEWABLE ENERGY. dip-shit.
n00bs7ud10z 3 years ago
exactly well said
otakukj 3 years ago
Use Stan's Invention On Your Own Car!
Just Replace the dot with .
hydrogenfuelcelldotweeblydotcom
This works I use it on BOTH my cars and i'm not paying a dime for gas. 100% LEGAL too!
Tomei1 3 years ago
"Carrying the extra weight of the water will not be economical" what a loon!LOL
Since when is water heavier than petrol?
0ddba11s 3 years ago 18
@0ddba11s The car doesn't run only on water, it runs with a mixture of petrol and water. So he fills the car up with a full tank of petrol, then adds 20 liters of water to the petrol, resulting in the "extra weight of the water".
jeremylew416 1 year ago
@jeremylew416 My point is water and petrol are near enough the same weight so why does that dummy make a stupid comment about having to carry a boot full of water not being economical. If the water gives you the same mileage as the same amount of petrol would then he made a stupid comment. Hence why I have a 6 against my comment now!
0ddba11s 1 year ago
@jeremylew416 My point is water and petrol are near enough the same weight so why does that dummy make a stupid comment about having to carry a boot full of water not being economical. If the water gives you the same mileage as the same amount of petrol would then he made a stupid comment. Hence why I have a 6 against my comment now!
As said the 20L of water adds 300 K to his normal 400K. 1 Imperial Gallon (UK) = 4.54609188 litres, so 4.4 gallons of water gives 300K try get that with petrol.
0ddba11s 1 year ago
@0ddba11s Water is far, far heavier than petrol.
a4d2d0 1 year ago
@a4d2d0 How much % and how much cheaper is the water than the petrol?
0ddba11s 1 year ago
@0ddba11s litre of petrol- aprox. .72kg litre of water- 1kg
so about 28% heavier than petrol, thats why gas floats on water, it is an oil. Take a cup of petrol, and a cup of water and mix them in a cup- the petrol will rise very fast to the top. Thats why when you put water in someone's gas tank it messes up the engine, because the water sinks to the bottom of the tank and the engine attempts to combust the water, resulting in a number of mechanical problems.
a4d2d0 1 year ago
@a4d2d0 Yes true I did know I thought of that after I posted it hence why a oil slick floats out at sea, but nothing significant in this case it was still a stupid comment by that guy.
0ddba11s 1 year ago
@0ddba11s or your own ass =))
BuRninsh 1 year ago
@0ddba11s WATER IS HEAVIER THAN PETROL!!!!!.Are u going to tell me that petrol is more dense than water?dont think so....
slideways200sx 1 year ago
@0ddba11s yes it is.. fluids have differnet weight to mass.. if i said that right.. like acid is heavier than water
nickernosher 1 year ago
@0ddba11s it is cuz if u mixt water with petrol ,the petrol stains will go to surface of water.and i think they mean the extra equipment not the water itself...
munteanuioan 1 year ago
@0ddba11s The fact that THIS post gets the most thumbs-up is the biggest evidence of all that everyone here knows NOTHING about ANYTHING.
somedudeinva 1 year ago 4
@0ddba11s Since water is water. Water density is (average) 1.0 g per cubic cm, gasoline is 0.73 g. That means 50L of water weights 50 KG, 50L of gasoline around 36.5 KG... Water is heavier as usual.
tecnobill 11 months ago
Comment removed
TheVelcroPants 8 months ago
@0ddba11s what they meant was that there is added weight to the car since you have the weight of the petrol and the weight of the water as well. the guy did not modify the car to only burn HHO, but instead an HHO and petrol mixture, therefore he would have to load up on both and have the combined weight on the vehicle itself
ju8no 5 months ago
Theres always one idiot to put down a great idea.
I agree with WILLNDENYS the 20lts of water is 20 kgs of extra weight,however it still gets an extra 300ks to a tank of fuel so where is the problem?
I would do it to my car to get hundreds of extra kilometres to a tank of fuel.
scottssrx 3 years ago 3
wast of time,
joshplunk 3 years ago
did you guys see that reporter for magazine!"all the water extra weight", what a moron for extra 20 lts in your car to get 700 km on slyline is amazing. he looks like his extra weight ! good job skyline . 300 kms extra for 20 ltrs of water .
WILLNDENYS 3 years ago 5
the world is made up of 75% water jack rabbit, we wouldn't run out of water until we have 10 consecutive black presidents
weezeman256 3 years ago 5
yea and plus the ice caps are melting soo itd do some good to use up some of that water
z440guy 3 years ago 2
Actually the world is made up of less then 1% water, but yeah, its a much much much better alternative then fuel. Apologies for being a pedant.
ScarletandCreme32 3 years ago
The world got 70% of water u faggot, just 1% of water is sweet water and 99% salt water which u can both use in this car! This tegnology is the future of cars!
espkustis 2 years ago
this will also purify the salt water it uses
WE HAVE A WINNER
kapoof2 2 years ago
wrong by mass the world is only about 33% water, but the surface is 70% water
johnnathanhope 2 years ago
johnnathanhope-water is only 0.023% of earth's mass.
godhammer666 2 years ago
this is probably a priceless comment right now :)) hey guys ... only 9 left before we run outta water !
myrmexaw20 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WHAT????? OK?? What are we going to do when we run out of water???? Thats what GA problem is now. NO water, no gas..what the hell is this world coming to??
abwright123 3 years ago
we have water in ga. just our lakes WERE low, it all back to normal now.
driftjdm 3 years ago
IF water cars on the roads,then we need to steal the water in the future... lol
watdouwan 3 years ago 2
Slipstream0001 is correct. The rest of you are really the morons.
The greenhouse effect is accounted by 98% water vapor. The rest is by CO2 and other gases. Do a search and you'll find it plain as day.
The problem is that even if humans started using water-powered cars (which is still BS, this one runs on a petrol/h20 mixture), we'd contribute maybe 1% to the greenhouse effect via water vapor.
The earth naturally produces the water vapor at a rate which humans have no control over. Research it.
visualkei72 3 years ago
Then it rains.
loaded44mag 3 years ago
I just posted video about the guys who sell the plans for $19.95. hho-hybrid . com or go to my videos I have one on my Dodge Stealth
amazinghybrid 3 years ago
Why did the tv host push over the bucket of water over? they could have got 300kms out of that!!!
Jimmetalrules5546 3 years ago 5
hahaha that bloke that says about the weight must work for an oil company.. if it gets 400 kms to a tank on petrol an about 700 with the water... isnt that a gain anyhow? thats nearly double the kms , so if you added 20 kg to your regular car would it cut the mileage in half... i doubt it. i say winner! woop woop!
DanielNeilson 3 years ago
Pretty sure that's an rb20e....by the rocker cover anyways.
hilectro 4 years ago
I said it contributes more to global warming, I didn't say whether it was better or worse. Look it up, then eat your words.
Slipstream0001 4 years ago
Oops my bad... I did say it was worse... I take that back, 'cos I know fuck all about the environment, just like you amateur scientists... google it - water vapour contributes a huge amount more than Co2
Slipstream0001 4 years ago
lol? .. yea its called clouds right?..:P lol
Waterisgasoline 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think water vapour is actually worse for the environment (global warming) than co2 but then again he's saving alot on petrol. Lol at the nerdy dude at the end. I wonder if Graeme likes fush and chups.
Slipstream0001 4 years ago
ur a stupid
originalbrownirish 4 years ago
Seriously who hired you? Exxonmobil? Chevron?
Nichen 4 years ago
u are either the dumbest person ever or u just simply work for a petrol company.
carlmanu 4 years ago
u r a moron..take a chemistry 101.. u dumb fuck..
droy84 4 years ago
u r a moron..take chemistry 101.. u dumb fuck..
droy84 4 years ago
If you were thinking, You wouldn't have thought that. SMH
B1GD34L 4 years ago
20 litres of water weighs shit all.wat a fukin looser
carcrazyjake85 4 years ago
lol 20 litres of water is 20 kg. what a STONEWEIGHT!!! :D
Nichen 4 years ago
WATER injection and combustion is nothing new.
when injected in a fine mist into the combustion process it can reduce detonation and burn cleaner, especially with forced induction. water is injected and correlated according to intake manifold pressure.
lukianp 4 years ago
Its a r33 gts ....no t with the base rb20e engine about as much torque as a angry sewing machine
MrMayhemskyline 4 years ago
wow.. wat a waste of a bucket of water,, when the guy spills it
mite2003 4 years ago
it's amazing how people act sooo retarded when the camera is around but for a skyline pretty nice
Sterlin876 4 years ago
i love it
THUNDERDOMEFXX 4 years ago
its a 4 door gtst, with rb 30 out of an R31 or a VL commo
omgwtfbbqsauce12 4 years ago
It's an R33 GTS (not GTS25 or GTS25t) with a factory equipped RB20E, which is a 2.0L SOHC 6Cyl (like the R31 and VL RB30E, but 2.0L). Possibly the most ghetto Skyline ever made.
funkymonkey81au 4 years ago
Wow thats odd. An rb30 in an R32.
intheshitter 4 years ago
na r33 know your years
THUNDERDOMEFXX 4 years ago
So it is!
Ive usually only seen thoughs rear lights on 32's
intheshitter 4 years ago
what a legend, i've seen a lawn mower and a motorbike on youtube run by the same method
AndrewEG 4 years ago
i like the w*nker at 1:45 "well you wont get better fuel economy because you have to carry all this water, the waters extra weight"
20 litres approx 20kg lol big burdon there
andyvxss 4 years ago
yea what a wanker LOL 20kg is nothing
BLU747 4 years ago
one step closer to hydrogen powered wehicles, I guess.
Skidracer21 4 years ago