Added: 3 years ago
From: Magluvin
Views: 19,992
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • is this really works?

  • I made a typo in my previous statement: I meant to say "YOUR" designs seem to be going in the right direction. (I know nothing about this and have never experimented with it.)

  • Sorry if this has already been addressed by comment or video:

    I'm wondering; ... What if you were to use 13 sectors (divisions) in the large disk (rotor), but only use 12 magnets (leaving an unbalanced gap); then, using a fixed central shaft, connect another duplicate setup on the opposite side, with just a slight variation in timing... Would the offset in repulsion be enough to drive it constantly? .... Just a thought.

    I am ignorant, but our designs seem to be going in the right direction.

  • What is the engineering application of this I have never seen anything like this before (i am not a professional engineer just a student)

  • you have done a great job, but your kinetic energy from the wheel needs to be stored and released again like a battery try using a capacitor to store the charge, and release it again back to wheel.

    think of a waterfall, water keeps moving but always cycles back from gravitational fields. so you haev the gravitational field but now you require energy to be put back into the system. (Like current from a water). If you understand how nature works, then you understand electricity. this no mystery!

  • you have done a great job, but your kinetic energy from the wheel needs to be stored and released again like a battery try using a capacitor to store the charge, and release it again back to wheel.

    think of a waterfall, water keeps moving but always cycles back from gravitational fields. so you haev the gravitational field but now you require energy to be put back into the system. (Like current from a water). If you understand how nature works, then you understand electricity.

  • Cool!

    at 1:24 until it stops spinning, it creates an optical illusion that the magnets are going outwards, because of the way they are positioned :D

  • There is a magnetic shielding materialcalled MUMETAL, it is also offered as a folia of 0,1mm thickness. Try to cover those spaces which offer resistance when turning the wheel and it should run for ever!

  • There is a magnetic shielding materialcalled MUMETAL, it is also offered as a folia of 0,1mm thickness. Try to cover those spaces which offer resistance when turning the wheel and it should run for ever!

  • There is no way a magnet motor can ever work:

    1) The force between two poles is along the line between the poles.

    2) The force between poles only varies with their current position (history doesn't matter)

    3) When you have more than two poles, take the forces between them in pairs and add.

    1&2 plus a little logic prove that no arrangement of two poles can ever work. Remember:

    Work = Force . Distance

    3 says that if two won't work no other number can either.

  • Hey it's a good method of mechanical transfer.

  • It is a very weak method of mechanical transfer. A set of gears is much better.

  • Knowledgemonger always has something negative to say of my stuff, But you should see his videos, oh oops, he doesnt have any cuz he is too busy discrediting others. This is one of my oldest vids and he is still here trying to make things look bad on my part. Fun fun fun.

    Magluvin

  • I point out facts. I am sorry if you find them negative. I find facts to be very interesting things and just naturally assume others would share my interest.

  • @stevesrd you sound like you live in a world where noones ever studied the science behind magnets...

  • Na, my point was simply that the shape of things allow things to act or react differently. And yes I implied the science of magnets and their fields are not fully understood. Nothing is ever fully understood, just those who think they fully understand something, however if your implying that you fully understand such, then by all means believe what you wish, and best wishes to you on such. I however am stating I do not fully understand such, and as such will attempt to understand further :)

  • I was basically implieing that if such a thing was possible, it would be something we're all aware of by now. People were discussing magnetism in 600BC. Every single experiment you see here on youtube has passed through the minds of millions of people, and tested many times over. that + laws of physics, and I just dont believe its possible. But that is opinion and a common argument around these parts. I have to say tho, I like your attitude and strong faith, and I hope you do find something :]

  • stretch the electrons to a long gated oval shape and then let them snap back creating a static discharge and then collect the static charges and store them in a capasitor... of some type..

    That`s my thoughts...just like our bodies build up static when we walk across a carpet floor and touch a door nob...LOL

  • The static you build up walking on the floor is a tiny fraction of the energy you lost into the friction that made it.

    If you want to help solve the energy problem, study up on physics and chemistry and electronics. You will see why ideas like this can never work. You may also find a useful idea. Even a small improvement can make a major contribution when multiplied by a large number of units.

  • I think your circle and centre are too perfect - the one that got all the excitement seems to either have an imperfect circular outside, or the centre is not exactly in the center, or the magnets are not perfectly aligned.

  • The details don't matter much since it is easy to prove, with a little physics, that no arrangement of magnets can ever be a source of energy. The whole idea is a blind alley.

  • Stan Meyer and Bedini and Maxwells origional equations would indicate otherwise also Tom Valone (physicist) has talked of accessing ZPE critisim is easy research and knowing truth is not!

  • The Bedini motor case is a typical example of how people get things wrong.

    The Bedini motor draws its power in very short pulses. These pulses contain a lit of high frequencies. Very few meters are designed to measure such things correctly. When you connect a meter to measure the current into a Bedini motor it is very easy to get the meter to measure all manner of nonsense. This leads to false claims of efficiency over 100%.  Correct measurements show well under 100%. (more)

  • The physics of magnets is well understood.

    (1)The force between two poles depends only on their current locations. It doesn't matter if you get to those locations coming or going.

    (2)When you have multiple poles, the total force can be worked out by just taking the poles in pairs, computing the force and adding up the results.

    Fact (1) makes it impossible for a pair of poles to ever be a source of power. Fact (2) makes this also apply to any combination of poles.

  • KNOWLEDGEMONGER,

    u 4got 2 add that man cannot, fly, exit the earths gravitaional field, view something invisible 2 the human eye or a woman becoming anything more than a baby making machine.

  • Been there and done that already with the same results you found.

    Check out my video on U tube called "AC motors used a different way" . You can see just how to keep your whipmag spinning forever with a power source near it but out of view of the camera. Its called Magnetc gearing. I ran my whipmag with that power source. Yes the basic concept is a hoax. You need a remote power source to operate it.

  • I found out who the original perpetrator of this fraud is. It's the user "TinselKoala" on YouTube.

    Look here before he deletes my comments:

    watch?v=OxEpSX2Hd54&feature=ch annel_page

  • the rotor is the sun, the small magnetic is the earth!!

  • HI

    Nice work it looks realy Good, very smooth

  • Thanks

    This was more to to see the effect of a larger than prescribed rotor upon the stator. Since the diameter is greater than prescribed, the gap between rotor mags is larger, the stator pauses quite a bit between whips. But AGW was there. It really makes me wonder if it could be made to work with 1 stator, and its just a matter of finding all the right variables. I realy like your settup. Very sweet.

    Check out my new vid, Robowhip

  • Cheers,

    1 stator! Ithink u would be dispointed here, on its own the stator can not pull the crown wheel,I have tried this,i have not been able to get it to speed up, but i can get it to run for 4 mins + when the 2 stators are stopped without them it only runs for 30 sec's If you hold all 3 stators stopped and spin the crown wheel on its own you will see the same effect.

    I am nealy done with my lastest attempt. and i feel that this could be it

    If you want to chat leave me a message!!

    Dave

  • Hey Dave. I doe see what you mean. The 2 idlers definately add a positive attribute. Have you tried a timed spin down with all stators(3) in gw? also w/out stators? I was having problems with my bearings. I soaked them in wax and grease remover and they seemed very dry and they spun up sweet, but after a bit, they seemed to tighten up a bit. It's hard to get gw on 1 of them. I figure some grease was still in there and I really need to blow them out after soaking. Even oils slug it up.

    Magluvin

  • Idiot.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more