Added: 2 years ago
From: Laitings
Views: 16,902
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (63)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Mufon es un mamahuevo, el cree que lo que dice es la verdad.

  • Chris Bledsoe contacted me in 2009 and said what I'm filming here in PA is the SAME type UFOs as they saw this night. So I have reason to believe that the ETs in control of these things must look like what he saw, as I believe him 100% -- since I and hundreds of others worldwide have seen the same spherical crafts hovering and glowing brightly.

  • They took ouh jeeeebbbss!!

  • This guy sounds JUST like Matthew McConaughey, If you listen to the video without watching it, you can see Matthew smokin' a fat doobie, talking about his UFO experience!

  • absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Actually, it kind of is, but that's not the point.

  • Cole World!!

  • I just saw this on TV - the report ignored quite a bit of important stuff - like the fact that helicopters fly over Fayetteville constantly. Were the fishermen drinking that night or doing any drugs? MUFON is not willing to even entertain the notion that someone might NOT have had an encounter. Ridiculous.

  • I wish the aliens would abduct me....... why not me aliens!!!???

  • @reigellatte17  soo AGREE with you like life can't get any more boring y are they still flying and hiding

  • I saw this on TV, and it really pissed me off that they used a lie detector. They're not even admissible in court, and the scientific community has disowned them due to them relying on faulty information. WHY would MUFON, which is an objective organization, rely on such bullshit?

  • Check out recent russian alien finding. It has the same clear or glass-like skin!

  • He is lying.

  • thats my father :D

    

  • Re the Fayetteville incident ,I have to believe this gentleman as i and a close friend of mine have also encounted an identity very similar to this mans encounter.

  • Re the Fayetteville incident ,I have to believe this gentleman as i and a close friend of mine have also encounted an identity very similar to this mans encounter

  • They used a retired FBI guy to do lie detector test. Why? I would NOT trust anyone from the FBI retired or other. He's still involved with the FBI. So, just like the FBI he wanna make this guy seem like he's crazy so the rest of us would not believe him. We all should know by now UFO's, Aliens, etc...do exist.

  • They used a retired FBI guy to do lie detector test. Why? I would NOT trust anyone from the FBI retired or other. He's still involved with the FBI.

  • This happened to me and my friends in the woods, but after researching UAVs and other technologies I think it is a UAV incorperating holographic technology, or possibly a UAV with features that may look like a face and eyes. I would imagine incorperating the two technologies could be very effective when delivering messages to those who may pose a threat. The creature or object that I was face to face with could only be seen down to the shoulder area, it was in fact a hologram UAV. SCAREY enough.

  • See this strange device. Is it in binary code? Aemii "project? help us, please

  • Have you ever dreamed of becoming abducted by aliens like him in that video one day? :-)

  • Is true that MUFON tried to trick on Arturo Robles Gil?

  • /watch?v=PY2QX13vSSY&feature=s­ub.co

  • The problem of verification is such a difficult one. You have the data - in the form of first-hand accounts - but you don't know if that data is pure fabrication. It's not unique in science. If an astronomer reports seeing a flash of light from one of the rings of Saturn, or a zoologist reports seeing a member of a species thought to be extinct, or a physicist reports an effect in the laboratory that neither he not anyone else can repeat, it's the same thing. Any of them could be lying.

  • ahh James carrion the Intel officer, you just wonder how he came about, and how mufon has been infiltrated by secret service agents . Their sole purpose is to stifle every major UFO incident..so it doesnt get the attention in the mainstream , and if it does..their job is to lessen impact so they dont have too many interested joe public. They say they are searching for UFO's the "5%" but the truth is they are trying to stop that "5%" from getting mass public attention.

  • This is the way to conduct investigations: interviewing the witness, ferreting out relevant information, assessing the witness's credibility, visiting the site and all the rest of it. Hats off to Rich Lang and his team. The witness draws attention himself to the goosebumps on his arm, but it's true what he says 'you can't fake it'. Try it. The entity is described as having 'red eyes...it was glowing'. Interesting. Glowing red eyes crop up time and again in descriptions of mythical beings.

  • i saw the same hing, its skin was what i described as digital but like glass almost describes what i saw. mine disapered suddenly as well.

  • @cheifburninggrass Where did you see these? I'm fairly sure that they are piloting the ones I've been seeing/filming as well. Must be tons of them. These same crafts being reported WORLDWIDE now.

  • @seeingUFOsPA What a dumbass LOL,Emily wants me, P

  • We are not alone?

  • How is he doing nowadays?

  • The description of the 'entity' is pretty much exactly the same as the entities in the Australian ufo case concerning Kelley Khan

    Can't post youtube link but it's easy to find under 'Australian UFOs 3'.

  • Never see them with a gun or camera...

  • I'm sure Chris is telling the truth.We have seen these things around the Okeefenokee swamp.Orange lights hovering and going down into the forest.Around old hopkins we saw one 2 nights in a row.Nov 14,15 2007.Very strange for a bunch of deer hunters.Some coon hunters were run out of a creek in same area one night in Jan.2008.They said it was like a red hot arrow head as big as a locomotive.This stuff fightens me ,am not into it,but their is diffinately something out their we can't explain.

  • Powerful Truth is yet to be told.

    Great show & Powerful stats to back it up.

    Thanks for checking into the unknown oddities in this world. and beyond. We are NOT ALONE.

  • hey mufon, i hate to be the one to tell you, but your field investigators tend to be fucking idiots.

  • 5 star report, one of the most interesting stories i've heard.

  • The episode on UFO Hunters had him failing a polygraph test.

  • There's a reason polygraphs are not allowed as legal evidence in court in the USA: they are not foolproof b/c in tests truth tellers can be shown as deceptive and liars can 'beat the box'. meaning they can fool the machine. In fact there are people specifically trained to do this in government and military. Also it's more objective if the polygraph operator does know know the details-this can be done when a third party is involved to help. All of this is why the polygraph is never primary.

  • This is absolutly true. Liars can beat it, and truth tellers can fail it. When I saw this on UFO Hunters, I personally believed his story, despite the polygraph failure.

  • @ dahur: & not to mention sociopathic individuals - which indicates a condition that goes far beyond the basic liar-who-can-beat-the-program person [though that is somewhat scary, too]. There's a fictional film that the curious might want to check out for a general idea - mentioning it may be a plot spoiler: the movie is called: High Crimes w/ James Caviezel

  • fantastic..

    5 stars and fav

  • grey167, yes, I agree, these fairy tales ARE fantastic and I'd give the vid five stars too - but five neutron stars.

    ;-))

  • Again...stating that this is a fairy tale, implying that the case is fiction is as scientificly false as stating that it's the truth. So your above statement is only an expression of YOUR interpretation of reality.

    If you really want to speak from a scientific POV all you can say is: "This case does not meet scientific criteria and is therefore unusable to the scientific community. Period".

    Your personal oppinion, as is the above statement, is of course very welcome, even if it's 'against'. :-)

  • Laitings, I've never denied, something might had happened. However, I've taken enough courses in communication- and negotiation-techniques, I can judge, these guys have some serious problems with honest reporting. Even if somebody is able to give an accurate report, there can be many other factors, that make such reports useless, like misperceptions, misidentifications, lack of physical education, etc.. Even photographic reports or radar tracks are without any scientific value, since these ...

  • We are not alone in the universe and never have been.. get used to it people...

  • I don't understand how you can say 'without a doubt'?

    To me, at least, this guy appears to be honest. Four other people witnessed part of the sighting with him. The incident has clearly put a strain on his marriage, as the later interview with his wife shows. The object he describes, which isn't 'regular' in any way, is found almost identical in another case. So either all these people are great liers and actors or they actually experienced 'something'.

  • Laitings, my statment refers to the facts, i) *ALL* claimants contradict in important points and ii) we have NO independent reports. Hence we have claimants and not witnesses. Imagine, three people would witness a car accident, and all of them would reported a different version of the accident. So these reports became useless claims. Further, the body-language of ALL guys in the vid reveals without a shwadow of doubt [sic] the guys did not tell the truth - what was confirmed later.

    ;-))

  • Now I'm not saying, Hey! Here's the proof of alien visitation. And I definetely feel a good bit of sceptisism is a good thing. But to state 'without a doubt'...nope doesn't work for me.

    Anyway, I respect your view. And that's the great thing. -We are all free to interpret reality within the realms of our own paradigm.

  • Laitings, reality doesn't need to be interpreted, since a claim (in the scientific sense) can be either true or false. The link between a hypothesis (aka a claim) and a fact is termed a proof. Beliefs are based on wishful thinking - and not on facts. Ordinary people fill in gaps of missing knowledge with beliefs, since they can't handle open hypotheses (aka the unknown). Exo-UFO-conspiracy-tainment industry exploits this mechanism, since they play around with the could-be-true factor.

    ;-))

  • I completely agree with you on the scientific part. But nobody is claiming that this case contains scientific proof of alien visitation. But the absence of proof in this case doesn't make it untrue, not even in the scientific sense. You just won't be able to use it for anything...in a scientific sense.

    All you can do is to write down the statements the witnesses express as their "truths" and review it the next time a similar event happens.

  • ... (ff 2) ... things provide only a documentation, something was there - but not what. It is, if sbdy. wanted to explain lighting by collecting lighting-reports. Hence the whole Ansatz of the so called UFOlogy to simply collect sighting reports can be termed as people fooling charlatanery. So you need appropriate scientific instruments and in-vivo investigation to discover the true nature of such sightings. Instruments like spectrometers, RF-spectrum analyzers, 3D-scanning LIDARs, gravito- ...

  • ... (ff 3) ... and magnetometers could do such a job. In the most simple case, an ordinary CD can already used as a diffraction grating to create spectrograms - aka hard scientific data. The widespread scientific illiterism however prevents people from doing such things. Thus, we have to wait a couple of centuries until real discoveries will be made. Until then, we can enjoy many, many exo-ufoistic conspiracytainment-shows und UFOlogists can continue to deceive their audience.

    ;-))

  • @sacha4you A claim in the scientific sense can be true or false???

    No sorry science is the understanding of the present based on tests that are waiting to be proved wrong or updated with better knowledge, science is not a yes or no answer and never has been.

    I agree to jump to the conclusion of alien visitation would be wrong, however jumping to the conclusion that a well respected business man and commercial pilot simply done this for 10 minutes on tv is complete nonsense!

  • @sacha4you many of us have seen evidence of visitation, i have. and sure i wish i had had a camera or camcorder to get u evidence but i didnt, but when u see 7 8ft diameter glowing swirling fiery plasma orbs fly right over ur head slowly at about 15 mph 500 ft off the ground. it lets u know that a great deal of evidence is being forcefully removed from the public's perception. they are there and this isn't just something to make money out of entertaining peoples fantasies. its real.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more