@mitchamus it's to move towards full body prostesis. for extended lifetime stuff. imagine the full body prostesis being physically attractive, not mechanical like stuff now.
@mitchamus because theres nothing better than us in the known universe :) Even with all the tecnology we have...we are still not able to emulate a hand perfectly in a robot. We are complex, unique and our body is very dynamic which took 6 billion years to evolve since the creation of earth. And yes i am quoting the evolution theory by Charles Darwin, we are simply superior to all known living creature in terms of manipulating complex things with hour hands.
listen to 4:47 > he said ''Right now, humans can't go above a couple hundred miles off the surface of the earth.'' If humans cannot go above a couple hundred miles up NOW... How in the world did we go to the moon in 1969? Hmmm.
@georgebobby100 Yeah, I heard that too. If someone asked him nonchalantly while you and he were drunk, Dr. Robert Ambrose would probably say "humans have NOT landed on the moon. It is impossible for humans to stay alive beyond the Van Alien Radiation Belt." Dr. Ambrose forgot to toe the party line -- He spilled the beans on the Space Race fiasco, the one that got President Kennedy assassinated.
The robot hand reminds me of a music video by Bjork. "All Is Full Of Love",
@Aeolis7 I think they are gonna put it on a big robot arm attached to the waist. An anstronaut (or maybe someone on earth) will wear a suit and goggles to teleoperate it to fix stuff in place of a real astronaut suited up. I believe GM is working with NASA to turn it into some kind of automated factory worker eventually.
It's humanoid because it was designed for human motions. You move your arms, the robot moves it's arms, you move your fingers, the robot moves it's fingers, you move your head, the robot moves it's head. The design is good enough as it is.
wow 4:44 he says no human has gone to moon yet... 200 miles according to him is the limit ... The average distance from Earth to Moon is 384403 km (238857 miles).
space is a vacum no pressure once in space for a few days getting all earth side toxins from blood no need to prebreath ?? what a odd justisfacation for robot ??
The thing with the robot hand is the control glove gives no force feedback. It has been found that humans suck with no contact feedback when it comes to these remote operator tasks. I have used position tracking (was a ball of lazer rangefinders) to move a hand around on a virtual screen, its horrid to try to pick up an object without feeling it.
@MyceliaProductions42 OMG I saw this and I was like it's going to turn into a bounty hunter like boba fett, I thought not to post it but you my friend have just made my day.
@amfikz...Petman's walking ability is far more advanced than anything that the Japanese robots have been able to show...and this robots hand movements are way above what the Japanese have demonstrated...you need to able to know the difference between an expensive toy and something the can actually do something useful.
and that is if your lucky. living in a capsule and smelling farts all day long is the lowest quality of life. we are replacing pilots on fighter aircraft because the human piolet can sit at a desk and sip coffee. the astronaut is a redundant obsolete component of space exploration.
I am 100 percent sure within 10 years the last human will venture into space unless
you cant see space travel the way it is now not until the private sector get really into it.
it maybe confined capsules in the beginning, but then later on they will have resorts and hotels on the moon places to live and work remember, people have bought rel-estate on the moon before .. some of these people may have plans if they get a chance.
no, i imagine it could be like any other city except it will be air conditioned, but massive, indoor areas and more advanced because robots can be built to work any time of the day and anywhere. If robots become complete workers to build cities, The cities of the future will huge and they will be everywhere, underwater, in space, etc.
kaferere, I'm not sure if you're serious or if you're just a troll. I tried looking through all of that unintelligible dribble, but I couldn't see WHY you might think the moon landing was a hoax. So, with all of your extensive research into the matter, why do you believe it was a lie? Before posting more riffraff, I'll let you know that I don't watch television and you don't have to worry about evil satellite signals messing with me (I've lined my walls with depleted uranium, you see :D).
iarejester, If you don't watch television, how did you see them land on the moon???? See how you sheeple can't stop lying? Were you on the moon? Or do you just fit in with what everyone else believes in case they think you're different? You are too far steeped in the religion that is NASA to think straight You are nothing more than a cult member trying desperately to defend an unprovable lie. (Like most sheep)
Hahaha, well that proves it. You're either 100% troll or 100% stupid. I'd like to hope people aren't this dumb, but yeah...
Well, in case you're not trolling, there are other means with which to view the footage (ie. the internet). But even IF that footage was faked, we can all be comforted with the knowledge that it's all theoretically possible. I invite you to bring me proof to the contrary.
Now, if there's no further business to discuss, GET OFF MY INTERNET NEWFAG.
iarejester, Temper, temper, dear boy! I notice now that you've been exposed as a simple liar, and have chosen not to answer the question of how you can state "I don't watch TV" but at the same time you saw the "moonlanding" "live" (LOL), you have reverted to type. ie. a rabid cult defender. Love your homepage by the way, plastered in pictures of Adolph Hitler. Another of your cult leaders? Well some of us are just born into obedience I guess! Do you practice marching too? LOL
" the question of how you can state "I don't watch TV" but at the same time you saw the "moonlanding" "live" "
you can watch the moon landing videos here on youtube, which is known as internet, which is different than television, is that simple enough for you wrap your meager brain around?
Brian500R, Ahhh....I see, the videos here on youtube were made using different footage than the original? So, exactly how were these videos made Brian? They're not the original TV pictures then? I wish I was as clever as you. Thanks for confirming to us what we already knew Brian. As a matter of interest, do you by any chance have to sleep with a rubber "bit" between your teeth? You say there are two types of "moonlanding video, one from TV, one from the internet? ..shhh shhh sleep now Brian.
the soviets, who had the most to gain from exposing this "hoax", admitted they could find no evidence to suggest the moon landings were faked, but you; you delusional nut case, whos pinnacle achivement in life was your burger flipping job at mcdonalds, think you can proove what the soviets couldnt?
Dearest Brian, the burden of proof does not lie with me, I'm not claiming to have landed on the moon. It lies with you, and the fact remains that you obviously cannot prove a lie. You were taken for a sucker by watching a TV show, get over it. You've lost all credibility because of these silly, easily seen- through hoaxes. Between the "moonlanding", 9/11 and JFK, nobody believes you anymore. Quit while you're losing. americans now pretend to be Canadian when in Europe out of embarrassment.
sounds like a cop out to me, a few minutes ago the evidence was undeniably on your side, according to you....what happened? and what exactly did you intend to prove by including europe and canada in your reply? you do realize those countries, as well as a dozen others, would have to be in on this hoax as well? please enlighten us as to what the soviets, japanese and koreans had to gain by partivipating in this great "cover up."
Brian500R, What Canada, the Soviets, Korea etc have to gain, is a huge market population in the middle of the Atlantic who are so in love with fantasy that they don't notice their country being taken away from them, piece by piece. One distracts a baby from its measles shot by dangling a bunch of keys (or a "moonman") in front of it, followed by heaps of praise. "You're Mommy's brave boy!" Meanwhile billions of dollars go "somewhere" "We're number 1" etc (with no healthcare) Sheesh!
Brian, NASA didn't force anyone to do anything. They were delighted to go along with it so long as america settled their debts with them. Don't you get it yet Brian? NASA is a huge collection agency so gvmnt can pay off the national debt. It justifies the disappearance of billions of dollars by defrauding the public into agreeing massive expenditure on "moontrips" NASA is a perfect church. "Send money, we'll give you a miracle" Low orbit is cheap, and who's going to know? TV did the rest.
Brian, I'll ask you a straight question; Who would you consider a better friend, one who told you that you had bad breath, or one who didn't and laughed behind your back? Think about the timings of these "historic" events. "moonlanding" = bankrupt u.s. over Vietnam disaster. 9/11=bankrupt u.s.over national debt and Enron scandal. Both events the same. ie. cheap physical event, TV fakes the rest. Zbignew/Obama=worse to come. I hope it's another moonshot hoax, not a new 9/11. Tic Tac Brian?
while i agree with you about obama leading my country further down the shitter, i dont see how faking terrorist attacks (911) would pull us out of debt.... plus if the powers that be wanted a war, there still would have been no need to "trick" us with a fake terrorist attack, people are dumb enough to believe anything theyre told, take the 911 truthers (spare change video) or the moon landing deniers (Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? (show that aired of fox)) for example.
iarejester, I know what a Troll is in the context of German folklore, but what exactly does it mean in the context of the internet? If I really am a "Troll" I'd like to know why. Cheers. P.S. Brian500R, delighted to see you using better English since we've been communicating, you almost sound intelligent now. "Hence"!..... Well done! You'll be drinking tea next! I'll have you civilized in no time! Later, dudes.
One who purposely and deliberately (that purpose usually being self-amusement) starts an argument in a manner which attacks others without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by his or her peers. He will spark of such an argument via the use of ad hominem attacks with no substance or relevence to back them up as well as straw man arguments, which he uses to simply avoid addressing the essence of the issue.
Leonard David published an article on spacedotcom on 27 April 2001 showing a picture taken by the Clementine mission which shows a diffuse dark spot at the location that NASA says is the Lunar Module Falcon. The evidence was noticed by Misha Kreslavsky, of the Department of Geological Sciences at Brown University, and Yuri Shkuratov of the Kharkov Astronomical Observatory in Ukraine.
He said "Humans can't travel more than a couple of hundred miles above the Earth right now...." Of course they can! This experienced engineer must be totally wrong surely? I saw men driving a car and playing golf on the moon live in my living room. My TV wouldn't lie to me.....would it? Have I been taken for a sucker? Where would all the taxpayers dollars go if it wasn't spent on moon vehicles? Surely they'd give them back to us? One small step for man, one giant scam for mankind.
Brian500R, Don't tell me you're one of those morons who think unclesam drove a car and played golf on the moon while at home he was busy carpet bombing Vietnam? Sucker.
well then who left the lunar laser ranging retroreflector array on the surface of the moon? we have been bouncing lasers off of it for the last 35 years.
i realize a nut job like you is probably too dense to understand this, but anyone with the proper equipment can bounce a laser off of the mirrors which proves the astronauts were there.
Brian500R, By the sounds of it, you've been bouncing lasers off your head for 35 years, or to be more specific, TV signals. There's no "moonrocks" Brian, they're just rocks Brian....., rocks. If you still believe in moonrocks though, I have a whole bagfull given to me by the British MI6, I'll send them to you and your friends for only $19.99 plus postage. Hurry while stocks last. Order before midnight tomorrow and recieve a free wolf mask to howl at the moon! Superman isn't real either Brian.
why are you avoiding my previous statement? pretty hard to argue with tangible evidence, isn't it?
like i said, i figured you would be too stupid to understand what i was telling you, so ill just let you go back yo your lunatic fairy tale world of conspiracy's, but the proof for the lunar landings is glaringly obvious for anyone with half a brain.
Brian500R, I totally agree with you,the proof of the lunar landings is glaringly obvious to anyone with half a brain, People like myself however, who enjoy the luxury of a complete brain, are not that easily fooled. I take it you're not interested in buying my moonrocks then? I could throw in some discount? I also have a piece of the "moonrover" motor if you're interested. Everyone would think you're really special if you owned a piece of the"moonrover". $19.95
i guess its easier to avoid the facts and turn this into some juvenile name calling match rather than just admitting you're wrong?
whatever, you're not worth the wasted time...
but by the way, the show "mythbusters" managed to completely debunk every single one of your nut job conspiracies regarding the moon landing in the span of a single 30 minute show. but of course it will be easier for you to reply with some half wit b.s. about moon rocks rather than debate the actual evidence.
Brian500r, In slightly more educated circles, one-fourth is known as a "quarter". I'm amazed that a man of your massive intellect didn't know this. Perhaps because you didn't see it on TV? You're very special Brian.......special needs. As for another one of your favourite TV shows (yawn) "Mythbusters", I'll stick with Isaac Newton for guidance on physics, you stick to two guys in baseball caps. Do you actually know anything else apart from TV? Moonmen=TV show, your proof=TV show. Geddit Brian?
another fine job of dancing around the facts, you waste of breath. you are a complete imbecile and the fact that your barely function remains of what used to be a brain are still able to perform routine tasks such as breathing and expelling waste.
the fact that you think you're smart for knowing one quarter = one fourth kind of speaks for itself. did you stay up all night studying to memorize that?
Brian500R, the fact is America has been bullshitting the world with cowboy campfire stories for decades. The fact is the world is not as gullible as y'all. Fact is, the world has seen through your TV trickery revealing a short fat baseball cap-wearing wizard behind the curtain. Fact is that (metaphorically speaking), you're a cowardly tin-man denying the truth, because you daren't face it. You may have trouble with the word "metaphorically" there Brian, it won't be in your pop-up dictionary.
Brian500r, the bigger the hole you dig, the harder it is to climb out. We all get it Brian, you dislike the truth and we must all listen to your version. You went to the moon, carefully avoided the Van Allen belts, drove around in a "moonbuggy" played a round of golf, flew home again just in time for tea. You "know" this for a "fact" because you watched it on TV. Which of us do you really think should be in a straightjacket? Where should I send the moonrocks Brian? What's your trailer #?
Hello Brian, your 3rd guess was correct, magic. I have a test for you. Think of all the things you believe as factual, then make a list of how many of those things came from TV, or other people who saw it on TV, or teachers who dictate rather than prove by example. It's a short list one ends up with. The BBC has always lied (that was Orwell's point) Big Brother Corporation B.....B.....C Room 101 was his BBC office when he worked there. In his book "1984" room 101 was the torture room. Read.
then why are we able to bounce beams of light off of them? no other spot on the moon reflects laser light, so what happened in that one particular location?
p.s., i dont watch tv so you cant stop mentioning it 75 times in each reply. its funny how you accuse me of getting info from tv when you are the "loose change" watching tin-foil wearing loony.
Dear Brian, if you don't watch TV, where did you see the beam of light reflected from the moon? Were you on the moon? Though I'm not impressed by your lack of language skills, I am impressed by your typing speed. I'm even more impressed that you managed to put your beer down long enough to reply. Cheers.
you're obvioulsy a paranoid-delusional lunatic, what more would i have to say to you? go see a doctor and get your condition under control, then come back when you are capable of rational discussion.
Brian500rR, A rational discussion? With what? Another boneheaded american who can neither speak nor spell the English language? There is no start point with someone who's educational input comes from two equally meatheaded americans in baseball caps. Isaac Newton was a real person Brian, he existed. Not a TV actor meathead. Try reading a book without pictures.
you conspiracy theorists are just like brainwashed cult members, when presented with evidence that doesnt agree with your nut job delusions you attack the person with juvenile insults rather than confront the facts.
Brian500R, just as soon as you present some evidence, (not two american meatheads on a children's TV show) you'll get a discussion. The problem is, you believe TV is evidence, that's why you're stupid enough to fall for the moon hoax in the beginning. Wean yourself off Sesame Street, study Isaac Newton, and get back to me. (Here's a hint, you won't find anything by Isaac Newton in K-Mart.)
lasers have been used to illuminate the special reflectors left behind that shoot the laser light straight back. It is bright enough compared to the background that the return signal can be seen. Using that information we know the exact distance to the moon's surface within an inch or two.
You realize that every single observatory in the world would have to be in on the "cover up" in order to propagate this "hoax?" Have you ever been in an observatory? Or are you just talking out of your ass and making yourself look like a complete moron for our amusement?
Are you really going to tell me next that the observatories in the UK, Japan, Korea, Italy, France, the Soviet Union, the Netherlands, the European Space Agency and Canada are all in on this hoax and lying for NASA?
Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions.
Brian500R, Still not a single tangible shred of evidence from your side I'm afraid. Van Allen denied nothing. Oh and NASA "lost" the telemetry tapes? A spokesman said "Even if we found the tapes, the machines don't exist to play them"??? I owned several, Brian. Honeywell, Ampex, Univac. Take your pick. Lies lies and more lies. NASA is a church and you are devotees, you exist on faith not science. The great american dream. LOL There's no Great British dream you notice, because we're all awake LOL
so you are saying that the observatories in the UK, Japan, Korea, Italy, France, the Soviet Union, the Netherlands, the European Space Agency, Canada, and the thousands of scientists who wwork at said observatories are all in on this hoax and lying for NASA?
you sir are too far gone, i am finished, and i sincerely hope you find help, for you are fucked in the head.
The radiation is actually evidence that the astronauts went to the Moon. Irene Schneider reports that thirty-three of the thirty-six Apollo astronauts involved in the nine Apollo missions to leave Earth orbit have developed early stage cataracts that have been shown to be caused by radiation exposure to cosmic rays during their trip.
In 2004, Drs Martin Hendry and Ken Skeldon at Glasgow University were awarded a grant by the UK based Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council to investigate 'Moon Hoax' proposals.[97]
In November of that same year, they gave a lecture at the Glasgow Science Centre where the top ten lines of evidence advanced by hoax proponents were individually addressed and refuted.
The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) launched their SELENE lunar orbiter on September 14, 2007 (JST) from Tanegashima Space Center, a main orbiting satellite at about 100 km altitude and two small satellites (Relay Satellite and VRAD Satellite) in polar orbit. In May 2008 JAXA reported detecting the "halo" generated by the Apollo 15 lunar module engine exhaust from a Terrain Camera (TC) image.
the astronauts that went to the moon were lucky they could have been hit by a large dose of radiation from the sun, they did't realise it then but they sure do now. GOTCH YA!!!!
great video thanks
jjclassjj 1 week ago
Very enjoyable thank you
prchecker 1 week ago
love the video really good
ericajjful 1 week ago
jasne zastąpmy ludzi robotami ale co wtedy zrobimy z wszystkimi niepotrzebnymi ludźmi których zastąpiły roboty
ImperiumGrigorium 1 month ago
Good. Now I don't need to masturbate by my self anymore.
CognitiveNetwork 3 months ago
Invasion of the Robonaut Humanoids!
ChaosButterfly8 5 months ago
robots are the future
FIGHTFANNERD3 5 months ago
In the future, astronauts will have long hair.
BeethovenWannabe 6 months ago
soon robot will do remote work for worker cant do
alienhddna 6 months ago
imagine walking into your private library and seeing this robot flipping through one of your books
downloadstuffgames 9 months ago
THE MOST IMPORTAN IS IF HE CAN TAKE DECITIONS FOR IS SELF AND ALONE...
DANATENS 10 months ago
I Robot
:)
concernedagain 11 months ago
robafet!
cpicestorm 11 months ago
Why can't human prosthetics look as cool as this?
Predatorfan666 11 months ago 4
@Predatorfan666 Maybe in the future they will. The problem is how do you control such a device with what arm that you have left.
rasmasyean 11 months ago
@rasmasyean its about figuring out the nerve pulses
TheMegamanDevil 1 month ago
@Predatorfan666
@Rasmasyean
look up the iLimb
DocUnsane 8 months ago
Human beings are crap...
Why are we so keen to make a robot that works the same way we do?
mitchamus 1 year ago
@mitchamus it's to move towards full body prostesis. for extended lifetime stuff. imagine the full body prostesis being physically attractive, not mechanical like stuff now.
dattajack 11 months ago
@mitchamus because theres nothing better than us in the known universe :) Even with all the tecnology we have...we are still not able to emulate a hand perfectly in a robot. We are complex, unique and our body is very dynamic which took 6 billion years to evolve since the creation of earth. And yes i am quoting the evolution theory by Charles Darwin, we are simply superior to all known living creature in terms of manipulating complex things with hour hands.
maristonrox 11 months ago
At the end he looks like optimus prime
twuggerler 1 year ago
listen to 4:47 > he said ''Right now, humans can't go above a couple hundred miles off the surface of the earth.'' If humans cannot go above a couple hundred miles up NOW... How in the world did we go to the moon in 1969? Hmmm.
georgebobby100 1 year ago 2
@georgebobby100 He's talking about the space station. No one ever "stayed" on the moon. We just stepped on it in space suits and came back.
rasmasyean 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@rasmasyean That's not the way Dr Robert Ambrose said it, and that's not the way I interpreted it.
''Right now, humans can't go above a couple hundred miles off the surface of the earth.''
I enjoy the robot at the end with the BobaFeet helmut face.
DancingSpiderman 11 months ago
@georgebobby100 Yeah, I heard that too. If someone asked him nonchalantly while you and he were drunk, Dr. Robert Ambrose would probably say "humans have NOT landed on the moon. It is impossible for humans to stay alive beyond the Van Alien Radiation Belt." Dr. Ambrose forgot to toe the party line -- He spilled the beans on the Space Race fiasco, the one that got President Kennedy assassinated.
The robot hand reminds me of a music video by Bjork. "All Is Full Of Love",
watch?v=EjAoBKagWQA
DancingSpiderman 11 months ago
@georgebobby100 , I was thinking the exact thing... LOL
EvilWarlock666 11 months ago
Give it an extra finger with artificial intelligence
TruthOverFear 1 year ago
I have seen how great his arms and hands work... how does he move?
Wheels?
Does he speak?
Take voice commands?
Aeolis7 1 year ago
@Aeolis7 I think they are gonna put it on a big robot arm attached to the waist. An anstronaut (or maybe someone on earth) will wear a suit and goggles to teleoperate it to fix stuff in place of a real astronaut suited up. I believe GM is working with NASA to turn it into some kind of automated factory worker eventually.
rasmasyean 1 year ago
@rasmasyean Excellent. Thanks for the info!
Aeolis7 1 year ago
This is cool
tostrong4you 1 year ago
in 30 years these things will walk around with leaf-blowers :)
vmorgun 1 year ago
so slow
vrshowdown 1 year ago
OMG ITS A STORMTROOPER
SpeedeyFreaks 1 year ago 9
Looks like a Cylon
Max721 1 year ago
@Max721 "Looks like a Cylon"? Think again. This is a Cylon...just a few generations away from the next stages of robotic evolution...
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
RobotNaut is going up to moon to build the first spacebase build on mark, Projeckt M starts in about 1000 days
CapperMeeh 1 year ago
The robonaut looks like a cylon.
simoncpu 1 year ago
yeah! alert LucasFilm LTD they casted an illegal Boba Fett helmet (TM)
captainFLUORESCENT 1 year ago
why make it humanoid? giving it multiple arms and a sensor system in the center would be a better design.
SpecterReflector 1 year ago 2
It's humanoid because it was designed for human motions. You move your arms, the robot moves it's arms, you move your fingers, the robot moves it's fingers, you move your head, the robot moves it's head. The design is good enough as it is.
dinmagic 1 year ago
maybe you like more this if you want a non humanoid design
picangi 1 year ago
wow 4:44 he says no human has gone to moon yet... 200 miles according to him is the limit ... The average distance from Earth to Moon is 384403 km (238857 miles).
sal7va7dor 1 year ago 2
space is a vacum no pressure once in space for a few days getting all earth side toxins from blood no need to prebreath ?? what a odd justisfacation for robot ??
time taken to pre breath
grilfers 1 year ago
Excellent video w interesting insight into NASA space program.
cyer5 1 year ago
The thing with the robot hand is the control glove gives no force feedback. It has been found that humans suck with no contact feedback when it comes to these remote operator tasks. I have used position tracking (was a ball of lazer rangefinders) to move a hand around on a virtual screen, its horrid to try to pick up an object without feeling it.
Mittau 1 year ago
Wow imagine what people from the 50s would of thought of this. lol. It would of terrified them. :P
dmace81 1 year ago
BOBA FETT?! BOBA FETT?!?!?!
MyceliaProductions42 1 year ago
@MyceliaProductions42 OMG I saw this and I was like it's going to turn into a bounty hunter like boba fett, I thought not to post it but you my friend have just made my day.
Zenodilodon 1 year ago
@Zenodilodon Only, if a Jedi with a purple light sabre cuts it's father's head off. We all know what the likelihood of that is.
Nomoreidsleft 1 year ago
How do you make a robot hand function better and faster than a human hand?
davepamn 1 year ago
Can robotnaut see in 3d or in different electrmagnetic spectrums?
Can robot learn to do tasks independant of a human operator alleviate the manual interaction with the machine to perform a task?
davepamn 1 year ago
the remarkable thing is that the video looks to be 20 years old, i can only imagine where we are now....
bryanmassie 1 year ago
Yes the singularity is coming very quickly and it will catch us before we have a chance to react.
Cannot wait.
The new civilization of man is coming.
bighands69 1 year ago
The singularity IS coming
TheEruditepolymath 1 year ago
I had no idea they'd made such progress with robotic hands. Amazing.
iksarguards 1 year ago
Its a Cylon! Quick we need Adama!
wolgreth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have the information to lead humanoid robot technology and intelligent systems for the Next 30 years if someone is interested let me know...
luisbeck007 2 years ago
lol i could use that to kick someones ass without actualy having to leave my house!
killer2611 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
please dont make robots. (you guys saw all those movies) lets keep earth plain and simple and beutiful
loopper9 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nasa robots are ~5 years below the japanese tech. why just don't by they tecnologie?
cause this robo looks like some robo that i have seen ~4 years ago
amfikz 2 years ago
@amfikz...Petman's walking ability is far more advanced than anything that the Japanese robots have been able to show...and this robots hand movements are way above what the Japanese have demonstrated...you need to able to know the difference between an expensive toy and something the can actually do something useful.
powerone1 2 years ago 2
@amfikz
this robot isn't below any japanese tech, it just doesn't have any cosmetic attachments that make japanese robots so "high tech" looking.
frog12345667891011 2 years ago 2
u r dum amfikz
LoomisLoftis 2 years ago
USA will build robot mechanics that can actually figure out how to fix/build things....japan will build sex robots. LOL!
LoomisLoftis 2 years ago
robo-fett
controlremot3 2 years ago
lol they gave him a bobba fett helmet
DrSparrowShrike 2 years ago
i thought it was just me
mousesploder414 2 years ago
why send humans when robots can do the job?
ustoeurtoustoeur 2 years ago
rael spase roobots!! coool1 its teh vuture nao
daftusername 2 years ago
if they master making robots like this man will be able to build bases on the moon and mars before actually going there.
vrshowdown 2 years ago
so why ever go there at all just let robots explore
datzfast 2 years ago
To live there of course.
vrshowdown 2 years ago
it would be like living under house arrest
and that is if your lucky. living in a capsule and smelling farts all day long is the lowest quality of life. we are replacing pilots on fighter aircraft because the human piolet can sit at a desk and sip coffee. the astronaut is a redundant obsolete component of space exploration.
I am 100 percent sure within 10 years the last human will venture into space unless
it is just for pure entertainment.
datzfast 2 years ago
you cant see space travel the way it is now not until the private sector get really into it.
it maybe confined capsules in the beginning, but then later on they will have resorts and hotels on the moon places to live and work remember, people have bought rel-estate on the moon before .. some of these people may have plans if they get a chance.
vrshowdown 2 years ago
so instead if a cell you imagine it more like a hole damn prison.
datzfast 2 years ago
no, i imagine it could be like any other city except it will be air conditioned, but massive, indoor areas and more advanced because robots can be built to work any time of the day and anywhere. If robots become complete workers to build cities, The cities of the future will huge and they will be everywhere, underwater, in space, etc.
vrshowdown 2 years ago
im willing to bet you all ready live in a city
just like the one you imagine and you didnt have to go into space at all.
datzfast 2 years ago
The private sector is great at refining existing technologies, but not so great at developing entirely new ones.
Atomicskull 2 years ago
lol funny note to end on.
The1stPoster 2 years ago
Boba Fett Its a bounty hunter!!!
Colm24e 2 years ago 2
cool
MarkuPro 2 years ago
touchpad on fingers
forgoden 2 years ago
ok..Its face looks like the robots in HE-MAN hahaa
sixstringmania 2 years ago
kaferere, this quote describes your perfectly:
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. Alber Einstein.
imarchello 2 years ago
alberT
radicalgarbage02 2 years ago
the helmet looks like it's from Boobafet in Star Wars..
0909azaz09az 2 years ago 11
thats where they kinda got the idea for some design elements :)
Attilaakiraly 2 years ago
@0909azaz09az Wtf? Boobafet? its boba fett.
aradioactivedonut 9 months ago
@0909azaz09az thinking the same thing
DarthMurder503 8 months ago
so many robots
SendPrestonToTheMoon 2 years ago
kaferere, I'm not sure if you're serious or if you're just a troll. I tried looking through all of that unintelligible dribble, but I couldn't see WHY you might think the moon landing was a hoax. So, with all of your extensive research into the matter, why do you believe it was a lie? Before posting more riffraff, I'll let you know that I don't watch television and you don't have to worry about evil satellite signals messing with me (I've lined my walls with depleted uranium, you see :D).
iarejester 2 years ago
iarejester, If you don't watch television, how did you see them land on the moon???? See how you sheeple can't stop lying? Were you on the moon? Or do you just fit in with what everyone else believes in case they think you're different? You are too far steeped in the religion that is NASA to think straight You are nothing more than a cult member trying desperately to defend an unprovable lie. (Like most sheep)
kaferere 2 years ago
Hahaha, well that proves it. You're either 100% troll or 100% stupid. I'd like to hope people aren't this dumb, but yeah...
Well, in case you're not trolling, there are other means with which to view the footage (ie. the internet). But even IF that footage was faked, we can all be comforted with the knowledge that it's all theoretically possible. I invite you to bring me proof to the contrary.
Now, if there's no further business to discuss, GET OFF MY INTERNET NEWFAG.
iarejester 2 years ago
iarejester, Temper, temper, dear boy! I notice now that you've been exposed as a simple liar, and have chosen not to answer the question of how you can state "I don't watch TV" but at the same time you saw the "moonlanding" "live" (LOL), you have reverted to type. ie. a rabid cult defender. Love your homepage by the way, plastered in pictures of Adolph Hitler. Another of your cult leaders? Well some of us are just born into obedience I guess! Do you practice marching too? LOL
kaferere 2 years ago
" the question of how you can state "I don't watch TV" but at the same time you saw the "moonlanding" "live" "
you can watch the moon landing videos here on youtube, which is known as internet, which is different than television, is that simple enough for you wrap your meager brain around?
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian500R, Ahhh....I see, the videos here on youtube were made using different footage than the original? So, exactly how were these videos made Brian? They're not the original TV pictures then? I wish I was as clever as you. Thanks for confirming to us what we already knew Brian. As a matter of interest, do you by any chance have to sleep with a rubber "bit" between your teeth? You say there are two types of "moonlanding video, one from TV, one from the internet? ..shhh shhh sleep now Brian.
kaferere 2 years ago
the soviets, who had the most to gain from exposing this "hoax", admitted they could find no evidence to suggest the moon landings were faked, but you; you delusional nut case, whos pinnacle achivement in life was your burger flipping job at mcdonalds, think you can proove what the soviets couldnt?
do go on, this should be good for a laugh...
Brian500R 2 years ago
Dearest Brian, the burden of proof does not lie with me, I'm not claiming to have landed on the moon. It lies with you, and the fact remains that you obviously cannot prove a lie. You were taken for a sucker by watching a TV show, get over it. You've lost all credibility because of these silly, easily seen- through hoaxes. Between the "moonlanding", 9/11 and JFK, nobody believes you anymore. Quit while you're losing. americans now pretend to be Canadian when in Europe out of embarrassment.
kaferere 2 years ago
sounds like a cop out to me, a few minutes ago the evidence was undeniably on your side, according to you....what happened? and what exactly did you intend to prove by including europe and canada in your reply? you do realize those countries, as well as a dozen others, would have to be in on this hoax as well? please enlighten us as to what the soviets, japanese and koreans had to gain by partivipating in this great "cover up."
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian500R, What Canada, the Soviets, Korea etc have to gain, is a huge market population in the middle of the Atlantic who are so in love with fantasy that they don't notice their country being taken away from them, piece by piece. One distracts a baby from its measles shot by dangling a bunch of keys (or a "moonman") in front of it, followed by heaps of praise. "You're Mommy's brave boy!" Meanwhile billions of dollars go "somewhere" "We're number 1" etc (with no healthcare) Sheesh!
kaferere 2 years ago
so nasa forced the entire world to go along with the hoax or else a trade embargo would have been enacted - on the whole world?
i know you're enamored with the u.s. and all, but we don't control the worlds economy to that extent.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian, NASA didn't force anyone to do anything. They were delighted to go along with it so long as america settled their debts with them. Don't you get it yet Brian? NASA is a huge collection agency so gvmnt can pay off the national debt. It justifies the disappearance of billions of dollars by defrauding the public into agreeing massive expenditure on "moontrips" NASA is a perfect church. "Send money, we'll give you a miracle" Low orbit is cheap, and who's going to know? TV did the rest.
kaferere 2 years ago
"NASA is a huge collection agency so gvmnt can pay off the national debt."
this is gold, do go on.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian, I'll ask you a straight question; Who would you consider a better friend, one who told you that you had bad breath, or one who didn't and laughed behind your back? Think about the timings of these "historic" events. "moonlanding" = bankrupt u.s. over Vietnam disaster. 9/11=bankrupt u.s.over national debt and Enron scandal. Both events the same. ie. cheap physical event, TV fakes the rest. Zbignew/Obama=worse to come. I hope it's another moonshot hoax, not a new 9/11. Tic Tac Brian?
kaferere 2 years ago
while i agree with you about obama leading my country further down the shitter, i dont see how faking terrorist attacks (911) would pull us out of debt.... plus if the powers that be wanted a war, there still would have been no need to "trick" us with a fake terrorist attack, people are dumb enough to believe anything theyre told, take the 911 truthers (spare change video) or the moon landing deniers (Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? (show that aired of fox)) for example.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Obvious troll is obvious.
Don't bother with this one Brian, he creates arguments for the enjoyment of it.
iarejester 2 years ago
true, but i rather enjoy their delusions.
some of them can be quite creative, hence me asking him to elaborate.
Brian500R 2 years ago
iarejester, I know what a Troll is in the context of German folklore, but what exactly does it mean in the context of the internet? If I really am a "Troll" I'd like to know why. Cheers. P.S. Brian500R, delighted to see you using better English since we've been communicating, you almost sound intelligent now. "Hence"!..... Well done! You'll be drinking tea next! I'll have you civilized in no time! Later, dudes.
kaferere 2 years ago
One who purposely and deliberately (that purpose usually being self-amusement) starts an argument in a manner which attacks others without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by his or her peers. He will spark of such an argument via the use of ad hominem attacks with no substance or relevence to back them up as well as straw man arguments, which he uses to simply avoid addressing the essence of the issue.
iarejester 2 years ago
Comment removed
MarcusBritish 2 years ago
i think he over-constructed his tin foil hat to the point of being air-tight, resulting in a loss of oxygen to his brain and mild retardation.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Leonard David published an article on spacedotcom on 27 April 2001 showing a picture taken by the Clementine mission which shows a diffuse dark spot at the location that NASA says is the Lunar Module Falcon. The evidence was noticed by Misha Kreslavsky, of the Department of Geological Sciences at Brown University, and Yuri Shkuratov of the Kharkov Astronomical Observatory in Ukraine.
Brian500R 2 years ago
why robot need complicaded palm and fingers to hold tools then you can attach set of tools on hands wrist?
lagofxlago 2 years ago
to manipulate the parts being worked on perhaps?
Brian500R 2 years ago
JUST USE ASIMO
Benjii1337 2 years ago
He said "Humans can't travel more than a couple of hundred miles above the Earth right now...." Of course they can! This experienced engineer must be totally wrong surely? I saw men driving a car and playing golf on the moon live in my living room. My TV wouldn't lie to me.....would it? Have I been taken for a sucker? Where would all the taxpayers dollars go if it wasn't spent on moon vehicles? Surely they'd give them back to us? One small step for man, one giant scam for mankind.
kaferere 2 years ago
dont tell me you are one of those idiots that think the moon landing was faked?
Brian500R 2 years ago 2
Brian500R, Don't tell me you're one of those morons who think unclesam drove a car and played golf on the moon while at home he was busy carpet bombing Vietnam? Sucker.
kaferere 2 years ago
well then who left the lunar laser ranging retroreflector array on the surface of the moon? we have been bouncing lasers off of it for the last 35 years.
i realize a nut job like you is probably too dense to understand this, but anyone with the proper equipment can bounce a laser off of the mirrors which proves the astronauts were there.
Brian500R 2 years ago 2
Brian500R, By the sounds of it, you've been bouncing lasers off your head for 35 years, or to be more specific, TV signals. There's no "moonrocks" Brian, they're just rocks Brian....., rocks. If you still believe in moonrocks though, I have a whole bagfull given to me by the British MI6, I'll send them to you and your friends for only $19.99 plus postage. Hurry while stocks last. Order before midnight tomorrow and recieve a free wolf mask to howl at the moon! Superman isn't real either Brian.
kaferere 2 years ago
why are you avoiding my previous statement? pretty hard to argue with tangible evidence, isn't it?
like i said, i figured you would be too stupid to understand what i was telling you, so ill just let you go back yo your lunatic fairy tale world of conspiracy's, but the proof for the lunar landings is glaringly obvious for anyone with half a brain.
Brian500R 2 years ago 2
Brian500R, I totally agree with you,the proof of the lunar landings is glaringly obvious to anyone with half a brain, People like myself however, who enjoy the luxury of a complete brain, are not that easily fooled. I take it you're not interested in buying my moonrocks then? I could throw in some discount? I also have a piece of the "moonrover" motor if you're interested. Everyone would think you're really special if you owned a piece of the"moonrover". $19.95
kaferere 2 years ago
i guess its easier to avoid the facts and turn this into some juvenile name calling match rather than just admitting you're wrong?
whatever, you're not worth the wasted time...
but by the way, the show "mythbusters" managed to completely debunk every single one of your nut job conspiracies regarding the moon landing in the span of a single 30 minute show. but of course it will be easier for you to reply with some half wit b.s. about moon rocks rather than debate the actual evidence.
Brian500R 2 years ago 2
in the words of stan marsh, in reference to conspiracy theorists such as kaferere:
"One-fourth of the population is retarded and wants to believe conspiracy theories"
Brian500R 2 years ago 2
Brian500r, In slightly more educated circles, one-fourth is known as a "quarter". I'm amazed that a man of your massive intellect didn't know this. Perhaps because you didn't see it on TV? You're very special Brian.......special needs. As for another one of your favourite TV shows (yawn) "Mythbusters", I'll stick with Isaac Newton for guidance on physics, you stick to two guys in baseball caps. Do you actually know anything else apart from TV? Moonmen=TV show, your proof=TV show. Geddit Brian?
kaferere 2 years ago
another fine job of dancing around the facts, you waste of breath. you are a complete imbecile and the fact that your barely function remains of what used to be a brain are still able to perform routine tasks such as breathing and expelling waste.
the fact that you think you're smart for knowing one quarter = one fourth kind of speaks for itself. did you stay up all night studying to memorize that?
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian500R, the fact is America has been bullshitting the world with cowboy campfire stories for decades. The fact is the world is not as gullible as y'all. Fact is, the world has seen through your TV trickery revealing a short fat baseball cap-wearing wizard behind the curtain. Fact is that (metaphorically speaking), you're a cowardly tin-man denying the truth, because you daren't face it. You may have trouble with the word "metaphorically" there Brian, it won't be in your pop-up dictionary.
kaferere 2 years ago
using the word "fact" a bunch of times while stating no actual facts doesn't work on us rational people.
now piss off back to the tin-foil-hat-wearing club of basement dwellers from where you came, loony.
Brian500R 2 years ago 2
Brian500r, the bigger the hole you dig, the harder it is to climb out. We all get it Brian, you dislike the truth and we must all listen to your version. You went to the moon, carefully avoided the Van Allen belts, drove around in a "moonbuggy" played a round of golf, flew home again just in time for tea. You "know" this for a "fact" because you watched it on TV. Which of us do you really think should be in a straightjacket? Where should I send the moonrocks Brian? What's your trailer #?
kaferere 2 years ago
well then how do you think the retro reflector array got up there? aliens? magic?
Brian500R 2 years ago
Hello Brian, your 3rd guess was correct, magic. I have a test for you. Think of all the things you believe as factual, then make a list of how many of those things came from TV, or other people who saw it on TV, or teachers who dictate rather than prove by example. It's a short list one ends up with. The BBC has always lied (that was Orwell's point) Big Brother Corporation B.....B.....C Room 101 was his BBC office when he worked there. In his book "1984" room 101 was the torture room. Read.
kaferere 2 years ago
then why are we able to bounce beams of light off of them? no other spot on the moon reflects laser light, so what happened in that one particular location?
p.s., i dont watch tv so you cant stop mentioning it 75 times in each reply. its funny how you accuse me of getting info from tv when you are the "loose change" watching tin-foil wearing loony.
oh the irony.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Dear Brian, if you don't watch TV, where did you see the beam of light reflected from the moon? Were you on the moon? Though I'm not impressed by your lack of language skills, I am impressed by your typing speed. I'm even more impressed that you managed to put your beer down long enough to reply. Cheers.
kaferere 2 years ago
and i am impressed with your question dodging skills.
good day, nut job.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian500R, You win.................your divine right to ignorance,
kaferere 2 years ago
ok, nutter.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian500R, such few words from one so gifted and knowledgable. Have you lost your american pop-up dictionary?
kaferere 2 years ago
you're obvioulsy a paranoid-delusional lunatic, what more would i have to say to you? go see a doctor and get your condition under control, then come back when you are capable of rational discussion.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian500rR, A rational discussion? With what? Another boneheaded american who can neither speak nor spell the English language? There is no start point with someone who's educational input comes from two equally meatheaded americans in baseball caps. Isaac Newton was a real person Brian, he existed. Not a TV actor meathead. Try reading a book without pictures.
kaferere 2 years ago
you conspiracy theorists are just like brainwashed cult members, when presented with evidence that doesnt agree with your nut job delusions you attack the person with juvenile insults rather than confront the facts.
i bet the scientologists would love to have you.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian500R, just as soon as you present some evidence, (not two american meatheads on a children's TV show) you'll get a discussion. The problem is, you believe TV is evidence, that's why you're stupid enough to fall for the moon hoax in the beginning. Wean yourself off Sesame Street, study Isaac Newton, and get back to me. (Here's a hint, you won't find anything by Isaac Newton in K-Mart.)
kaferere 2 years ago
lasers have been used to illuminate the special reflectors left behind that shoot the laser light straight back. It is bright enough compared to the background that the return signal can be seen. Using that information we know the exact distance to the moon's surface within an inch or two.
Brian500R 2 years ago
You realize that every single observatory in the world would have to be in on the "cover up" in order to propagate this "hoax?" Have you ever been in an observatory? Or are you just talking out of your ass and making yourself look like a complete moron for our amusement?
Are you really going to tell me next that the observatories in the UK, Japan, Korea, Italy, France, the Soviet Union, the Netherlands, the European Space Agency and Canada are all in on this hoax and lying for NASA?
Brian500R 2 years ago
Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions.
Brian500R 2 years ago
"We've been to the Moon nine times. Why would we fake it nine times, if we faked it?" — Charlie Duke
Brian500R 2 years ago
Sir my nipples are tingling with excitement in anticipation of your next loony-bin reply.
Brian500R 2 years ago
Brian500R, Still not a single tangible shred of evidence from your side I'm afraid. Van Allen denied nothing. Oh and NASA "lost" the telemetry tapes? A spokesman said "Even if we found the tapes, the machines don't exist to play them"??? I owned several, Brian. Honeywell, Ampex, Univac. Take your pick. Lies lies and more lies. NASA is a church and you are devotees, you exist on faith not science. The great american dream. LOL There's no Great British dream you notice, because we're all awake LOL
kaferere 2 years ago
so you are saying that the observatories in the UK, Japan, Korea, Italy, France, the Soviet Union, the Netherlands, the European Space Agency, Canada, and the thousands of scientists who wwork at said observatories are all in on this hoax and lying for NASA?
you sir are too far gone, i am finished, and i sincerely hope you find help, for you are fucked in the head.
Brian500R 2 years ago
van allend denied nothing? when did you talk to him? did you record the interview?
or are you making shit up again, you loony tunes basement dweller?
Brian500R 2 years ago
The radiation is actually evidence that the astronauts went to the Moon. Irene Schneider reports that thirty-three of the thirty-six Apollo astronauts involved in the nine Apollo missions to leave Earth orbit have developed early stage cataracts that have been shown to be caused by radiation exposure to cosmic rays during their trip.
Brian500R 2 years ago
In 2004, Drs Martin Hendry and Ken Skeldon at Glasgow University were awarded a grant by the UK based Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council to investigate 'Moon Hoax' proposals.[97]
In November of that same year, they gave a lecture at the Glasgow Science Centre where the top ten lines of evidence advanced by hoax proponents were individually addressed and refuted.
Brian500R 2 years ago
The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) launched their SELENE lunar orbiter on September 14, 2007 (JST) from Tanegashima Space Center, a main orbiting satellite at about 100 km altitude and two small satellites (Relay Satellite and VRAD Satellite) in polar orbit. In May 2008 JAXA reported detecting the "halo" generated by the Apollo 15 lunar module engine exhaust from a Terrain Camera (TC) image.
Brian500R 2 years ago
and why do you keep mentioning moonrocks? i never once mentioned anything even remotely pertaining to moon rocks.
Brian500R 2 years ago
unless of course you want to claim it was left there by aliens, which sounds ad hom for a nutjob like you.
Brian500R 2 years ago
I love his hands
juanCarlosvp7 2 years ago
I bet jesus returns as A.I.
lysergicaddict 3 years ago
100 miles above earth huh ? how the hell did we make it to the moon then.
GOTCH YA !!!
helmeta 3 years ago
the astronauts that went to the moon were lucky they could have been hit by a large dose of radiation from the sun, they did't realise it then but they sure do now. GOTCH YA!!!!
Mariusstr 3 years ago
the part where he can recognize what tools he'll need soon is amazing, but it isn't really a robot if someone has to control it
zomgscissors 3 years ago
iit is a robot and even cool because u can control it!
legendmilanboss 2 years ago
looks like boba fet
Antillektuell 3 years ago 2
looks like optomis prime a little
gaberiel1994 3 years ago
I wouldn't mind a Mandalorian space robot doing menial tasks.... Like bounty hunting.
thdark 3 years ago
Mandalorians!
Calebkoss 3 years ago
The first thing I thought when I saw the robot was a Mandalorian helmet.
djroebuck 3 years ago
same thought
alexx2019 3 years ago
That's just awesome!
smashingparadox 3 years ago
Is that a see-through Mandalorian helmet from Star Wars?
Nephy3107 3 years ago