Added: 4 years ago
From: olioh
Views: 20,791
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it also depends on how good the receiver is no?

  • He needs to team up with Graham Hancock and other like them to start a new university with new subjects.

  • THIS IS A REAL SCIENCE!!! BEYOND PHYSICS!

    FOR THOSE WHO DONT BELIEVE, ARE JUST SIMPLY IGNORANT! THATS ALL!

  • The use of the word "heretic" is very accurate. Mainstream science is a religion.

  • @alexkidd3d heretic comes from greek and means "able to choose" or "freethinker". BS is what we study at school. Acupuncture is not western medicine, but has been working for thousands of years. And there is no need of belief in Jew-Zeus nor in God. But, of course, western science explains perfectly our world with COINCIDENCES. From the big bang to the primordial DNA, haha....

  • @RedQueenWarrior If science explains those things "perfectly" why is it still the Big Bang THEORY? Also, science doesn't explain through coincidence.

  • @starius1154 Maybe you didn't understand my sentence, or maybe everything I wrote.... I was joking that it 'explains' everythings.

  • @starius1154

    It's called germ, atomic, and circuit theory too. Theory has a different meaning in the realm of science.

  • I absolutely believe in this phenomena--Telepathy(communica­tion mind to mind--sentences & words) & when someone looks at you and grabs your attention-when you are facing a different direction-I believe in telepathy 100% -IMPORTANT! I also believe people can LIE about telepathy-either saying they read your mind or that you communicated something that you absolutely didn't- or also they think you are reading their mind when you are not--this is also problematic--The Spoken Word is very important!

  • oh jeez, a heretic? that implies there's some kind of scientific dogma. In reality his book was just unsubstantiated and misleading and utterly bullshit.

  • MAYBE DOGS JUST MEMORIZE WHAT YOUR CAR SOUNDS LIKE. THEY HAVE BETTER HEARING THAN HUMANS SO THEY CAN HEAR A CAR LONG BEFORE WE CAN. THEY ALSO WAIT ALL DAY LISTENING TO DIFFERENT CAR SOUNDS SO THEY KNOW WHICH IS YOURS.

    thats why some dogs bark a lot because they hear a lot of stuff that we don't

  • @50kT He has done that already as well, He had the owners come home using multiple methods, the dogs still knew.

  • i know too when someone is going to my home. about half a minute i have the sense when someone is coming.

  • Dogs deffo have a 6th sense, my girlfriend is alive thanks to her dog.

    long story short there was a forest that her mum used to walk thru everyday with the dog, my g/f and her brother when they were little, the dog was an alsation trained in a marine base, one day they came to the edge of the woods and the dog just started going nuts, pulling real hard and barking and biting to get away, they decided to walk around the woods and went home. ........

  • i read his book and this guy is no scientist, and the book is tripe. this is all rubbish for susceptible people.

  • lol yah this seems more religous then scientific, the kind of thing that pushes us back into the stoneage its why you were seen as a heritic, cus its more of your own idea not any actual proof, so in reality your book was like releasing hitlers mon komf after the terrible events of world war 2, a book about a crazy guys ideals. nothing against his scientific carreer, just that anyone will beleive in something enough to sell a book about it

  • @max170892 sometimes it takes a heretic to be an innovater

  • Rupert Sheldrake has also worked alongside amazing minds of the century..... Terence Mckenna and Ralph Abraham to name a few ..

  • wow i'm 10 and i actually get this extended mind theory

  • @demanboy1231

    lol, age has no meaning.

  • @demanboy1231 no one cares troll

    most people get it

    regardless of age

  • pair of slacks

  • Um, like a dog can't tell U have a certain repeating SCHEDULE!! ROFL! =)) OMG! Wise up, clowns.

  • A few years ago I had a pet dog which I lost while moving house, she ran away in a park just at dusk and failed to return to my calling, 3 days later I heard barking and I looked outside, and there was my dog, the dog never saw the new house and some how followed my scent or something, it was over 80km away from my other house so it was rather strange, but 3 weeks after this my dog died of a brain tumor.

  • I'm partly in favor of no telepathy etc, rather the patterns and the thing that these things decide yes/no questions, so there's some 50% chance on each to be right, but little that there's a majority of right

  • Telepathy does not exist. Nobody is physhic or telepathic or telekenetic, etc. Go try 2 find somebody 2 tell U what the beige object under my right computer monitor is. It is less than an inch tall. Go on - back up your BS =)) I'll leave it there 'till U respond.

    Meanwhile, I can use my HANDS 2 type U a message via devices that actually EXIST.

  • I'm on your side, Death, till it can be evidenced, there's no reason to believe it exists.

    I'm not about to be so openminded that my brains fall out of my skull, as most new age crap requires :)

  • If U R 'partly in favor of telepathy' that contradicts what U just said. U R very Twilight Zone 1984 'doublethink' =P Sound like an Obama voter 2 meee! HAHA

  • you misread :) read it again... it says "partly in favor of no telepathy"

  • partly against = not completely. Therefore U partly SUPPORT telepathy = U R a fool. + U sound extra-retarded 'cuz U pretend U don't understand English, freak.

  • right or the other part is simply unbiased, though I likely am a fool, but how the hell I manage to pretend to not understand english is beyond me

  • U say 'partly against telepathy' = partly FOR it. U know, like 'glass partly full' = partly empty. I invite U kindly 2 stop talking out of your ass, freak. U sound like a Mexican, pissing on English.

  • i disagree.

  • @kolin19Ytube No U don't. U R just trolling, trying 2 get yourself a 'chat buddy' 2 argue that the moon isn't cheese. Get a life.

  • nice move to try and prevent me from responding but i do not argue but state my opinion .

  • @kolin19Ytube I am not your 'chat buddy', & there is no debate or argument. U R just a pethetic troll who gets off denying obvious, verifiable reality, just 2 B a pest jackass. U R pathetic.

    Telepathy is BS. Find someone 2 tell me what the blue object is on my desk, dork. U can't. Y? 'Cuz telepathy is BS!

  • Ok, if you don't want to chat then fine , but if you do not want to hear other ppl's opinions that might be a problem for you.

  • @kolin19Ytube The fact ESP is BS is not a matter of opinion. The fact the sun shines is not opinion, nor is the fact the moon is not made of cheese, etc. U R just a fuking retard troll W/no life, so U go around trying 2 fill it by saying nonsense U cannot possibly believe.

    Now, I am always open 2 new information. Go ahead & find somebody U think has 'ESP' & have them tell me what the blue object is on my desk =) Go ahead. Do it. Do it NOW. If they can say, then I will 'believe'. Really

  • lava lamp

  • @kolin19Ytube troll

  • @kolin19Ytube No U don't. U R just trolling.

  • Telepathy and the paranormal are NOT big mysteries of science. Paranormal is simply another word for "we don't know what happened" or, better still "we don't know what happened but I'm sure I can make a buck or two from it" and telepathy doesn't exist.

    We have no valid experiments that confirm telepathy, and we know of no mechanism through which it could possibly work.

  • What do you mean "we know of no mechanism"? Have you ever used a cell phone or listened to a radio? The human brain is a very powerful organic computer with electrical impulses coursing through it. You mean to tell me that a little layer of bone if capable of trapping the resonant energy from those discharges? That's to say nothing of quantum entanglement and the nature of matter as energy! There may be no SINGLE mechanism to explain it, but there is too much possibility to deny it.

  • "Have you ever used a cell phone or listened to a radio? The human brain is a very powerful organic computer with electrical impulses coursing through it."

    Yes I have. And we understand exactly how those machines work. And we ipso facto understand that the human brain cannot possibly generate these fields. There are animals who use electic fields to sense their environment. We also understand how that works and we know humans do not have this ability.

  • "That's to say nothing of quantum entanglement ..."

    We have no evidence that quantum physics plays a part in the essential chemistry of life. And until we do we would be wise to not claim that it answers any questions.

    I'm happy that Sheldrake performed these experiments. We should always do experiments to test our hypothesis. And when the experiments show the hypothesis is faulty, the hypothesis should be dropped. Data-mining the results is a major offense in the arena of science.

  • But its a possibility, that you have to consider.

    You start so well and then your closed minded to the prespective.

  • It's just so obvious (and infuriating) that science has become a religion. No longer a tool for learning, the academic community has become a new Vatican with the power to dislodge and condemn anyone that speaks out against the conventional consensus for what academics decide is relevant information for the public to know. Dr. Sheldrake is helping to expand the collective human consciousness, but our masters saw him as a threat. They're obviously scared of us knowing the truth. We are powerful.

  • "It's just so obvious (and infuriating) that science has become a religion."

    What's the weather like on Mars? What planet do you live on dude? There is no central power in science which condemns or ratifies new ideas. These are the rules:

    If you have a new idea, people will dismiss you until you have experimental evidence to support it. If you have experimental evidence people will be sceptical until the experiment has been repeated by someone else. This is the best way to ensure progress.

  • did they call their dog fanny or did i miss hear that? that dog must feel embarassed in the park..

  • they are a gay couple lol

  • The State will not pay for research because then we would see they are no longer statesmen but rather tradesmen and that in human souls.

  • Me and my brother did a sleep awareness experiement a couple years back. One of us would stand by the other bedside, for a minute, making no noise, in attempts to wake the other up. I remember being the most effected. We didn't share rooms, and thought violent thoughts at one another.

  • Buddha already discovered that since 2500 years ago, and he also mentioned how to control and use it and how to end it.

  • lol, they just had to go and name their dog Fanny

  • lol are they a gay couple?

  • yup they are. so?

  • The part that is unscientific isn't that paranormal things seem to happen, but the untestable explanations to these phenomena.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more