That is definitely a part of the plane because if you look at it, a dark object goes above the second line of flame darting out, and it goes out of sight, then re-appears as that dark object. It can't be a bird, it's, too large and goes behind the tower.
Bush caused 9/11 and blamed it on iraq.. Y u ask well the us air force was running a simulator on wat would happen if something did hit the twin towers a week before.. also BUSH RECICVED INFO THAT THEIR IS GOING TO BE A ATTACK AND HE PUSHED IT ASIDE AND WENT TO HIS RANCH IN TEXAS.. I HATE U BUSH
No that thing looked like a tiny bit of debris, it doesn't come out the back, how can you even know? It came towards the camera man, if you look at the first normal speed. Then camera guy like flinches and the camera moves. I'd say it's a tiny bit of debris that has been blown towards the caera man.
@thendara69 No, that's not what we're talking about. Judging by your spelling and grammar, I'd say you're the 'dumb' one here. How about you wait for someone to clarify before calling someone dumb.
@cameoooful You go to New York and look the family members of the ones who died in the crashes that their family member didn't actually die. Come on, man.
It's a bird! LOOK CLOSELY TOO THE TOP RIGHT AND YOU WILL SEE THE FAINT IMAGE IT MAKES PASSING THE CAMERA. It's just startled by the explosion and got the hell out of there. Apply logic and see the simple explanation FIRST people.
I hope you aren't talking about that black thing, that is obviously some little thing flying in front of the camera. Otherwise it would be about 10 floors high and traveling VERY fast. If you are talking about the fireball that comes out of the building, well that is to be expected when you fly a plane into a building, shit is going to go flying.
you should actually do a frame by frame measurement to see how fast it is actually moving. You can easily calibrate your distance by using the width of the Towers.
There is a video on youtube titled "ufo grazing wtc building" by magicranch. It shows this very same thing it is not a trick of light and it does not originate from the plane or building. Follow the trajectory in reverse and you will see.
that must be a ufo or some paranormal theory like the satan flying out or a ufo coming out after osama hit the building r.i.p for all the people who died
That object was so close to the camera it has the effect of moving fast. It doesnt even look like it came from the south tower. It starts above the north tower moving fast looks large if it had hit the ground at that rate and size there would be damage noted. Its probably a bug or something of the sorts close enough to the camera to give the effect of a large fast moving object coming from the tower. IF this same film was done with a high speed camera we could see what it was.
i almost said its possibly bits of building or plane but it couldnt have reached so far away from the tower so quick as that..wierd and everything about that day is getting wierder
My assumption is the dark object (seen in a steep angle dive from other perspectives) is the device that was 'training' the 'targeting lazer' on the second tower, to guide the remote controlled aircraft directly into the targeted area, where even more ordinance was placed in the structure. Youtube has more footage of an 'inferred targeting laser(military hardware) ' being 'trained on the building, slightly above the aircratt 'impact zone.
It's the Ghost Effect... where if you think you're in a haunted house, every damn spec of dust in the camera is ectoplasm and every reflection is proof of a ghost.
anybody who looks at this footage and believes that is a passenger jet liner,is either blind or just a fucking idiot. slow down the playback before the "plane" hits and you can clearly see that it is a missle. and you dont have to be a science professor to understand that it is impossible for the aluminum nose of a jet to make it through those steel coloums and come out the other side nose in tact...WAKE UP YOU FUCKING MORONS. Sept 11 2001, signified the true beginning of the end.
Are they talking about the object that flies over the CBS logo? If so, it's a bug. You can see it fly between the camera and the second tower. You don't see it enter frame because of the smoke. Watch the top of the second tower and you see it pass by. Damn flying cockroaches.
This is the stupidest shit I have ever heard. If you hit a fixed object while going over 100mph not wearing a set belt you will exit the vehicle because of continued inertia, hit a second stationary object and it will change your direction again.
Looks like its closer to the cam, but comes from behind the tower. I was gonna say a UAV, there was at least one filmed that day, but this is sooo fast. Not sure, but very interesting.
IT SEEM LIKE IT WAS TRAVELLING WITH THE PLANE... I BELIEVE SOMETHING EVIL (IF NOT HIMSELF) WAS GUIDING THE BEASTS TO THIS TRAGEDY. AWFUL, DISGUSTING AND NOTHING WHICH DESERVE TO BE ATTENTION PAYED TO. OUR LOVED ONES REMAINS WITH GOD AND WE ARE STILL ALIVE, REJECTING THIS LOW LEVEL ACTS. LIVES CAN BE CEASED, BUT LOVE AND FAITH IN GOD IS ETERNAL.
that object that is shooting from the side of the tower is what is known as a "squib". A squib is the repercussion of a small explosive detonation in CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS. if you've seen other WTC footage and compare them to controlled demolition footage, you'll notice that there are many of these squibs occurring in random places around the building. Their purpose is to break the building's structure internally so it makes a clean and easy free-fall, instead of a toppling mess. DONT BE BLIND!
Not sure which object you are worried about - one is clearly debris from the aircraft that has continued through with the momentum of such a large aircraft hitting at high speed (oh sorry I forgot it was added by animation!!) The other is nothing to do with either an is close to the camera if you play the clip from about the 50sec point and look at the top left hand corner of the picture it flies infront of the building. I'm not sure what it is but it's does not look sinister!!
Someone should try slowing down the footage from a different angle.Might be worth looking to see if it happened during first hit.Could be a bug.But it does look like it comes from the wtc.
guys i am a muslim and i dont agree with all this theory that the videos that we all se is made by the media. the two towers was hit by planes and the terrorist where inside of it. But they must had a very strong link in the inside of the goverment to succeed in a operation like this. So i think that the terrorist where helpd by som ppl from the goverment.
Google "Operation Northwoods", it was a plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation,
Operation Northwoods included proposals for hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government.
all you retards who say it's a bug, learn to pay closer attention, he's not talking about the fucking bug that flies in front of the camera before the impact, he's talking about the piece of debris that comes shooting out of the building after the fireball. which seems a bit late. all the other debris came out with the fire then after the fireball has reached it's maximum distance from the building something comes barreling through... Don't know what it is but it's not traveling at 5000mph.
There is footage from another angle, on the opposite side and farther away, where you can see this object and how fast it travels to catch up to the explosion when it happens. Another, where a triangular shaped craft zips between the towers. Orbs in the smoke above the towers right before they explode and collapse. They were all over the sky on this day.
Yeah right, anything other than what it has to be. If you look really close and open your eyes, you'll see it comes from behind the north tower at a steep angle, and is definitely not debris from the south tower, which isn't even close to being that far away from the south tower yet.
Also, the object is traveling at least 10 times faster than the aircraft or any of the debris. If the aircraft was travelling at 500 mph, then the object is travelling at least 5000 mph.
@IDislikeCowards Engines would travel ahead of the plane because they are carrying all the weight so if it comes off it will keep the momment up and the plane will stay at the same pace. especualy if the plane comes to a stop very quickly.
People, don't waste your time arguing with the trolls that are paid to go along with the gov lies. Truthers kids can say, "My daddy is not a coward and will stand up to the evil bastards that really did this." The gov story's kids can say, "Darn,....My dad is a wussy that sold out to the greedy zionists. Shoot fire, I wish my Dad had the brains and the guts to be honest in the face of traitors and greedy lieing murderers." That is what it boils down to. So go justify why you went along.
I am an Architect and it is well known in the Architect community that these buildings, givin the congestion of the area were actually designed with point of the structure intentionally designed to pancake straight down. That is why so many people think it was imploded, because they do not know these things. It is a fact. And thank god it did pancake instead of fall over. It would have still killed all in the building plus thousands in smaller buildings and streets if it fell over across1091 ft.
@rrussell39 I am an Astronaut of the Astronaut community. I don't care who you are or what you say, you can't deny facts and cover up evidence, you just can't. Ever see the video of the owner of the two buildings? Or what about the firefighters underground that heard explosions, the ones who survived told the story, but I guess you already knew that, and then your large knowledge-base on buildings must allow you to figure out how they exactly fell, because you know... your an architect...
@Razr89A OK Rocket Man, First off I was replying to what Janet Amelia had to say. I wasn't even caring what the "thing" that appeared to shoot out of the building across to the lower portion of the screen was. Second, WTF got your space panties in a wad in your personal attack reply? I am an Architect, with a 2nd degree in Mech. Engineering as well. I don't care if you believe me, it's irrelevant. And I am right on the collapse. As far as the streak? What do you as an Astronaut think it is?
@Razr89A I never addressed anything about a cover up or anything did I? All I did was explain that those building were designed to fail exactly the way they did. When those buildings were built in the 60's, they were rated for a full speed 707 airliner hit, but unfortunately nobody had the foresight to imagine bigger heavier planes. All building that tall have a failure threshold, and are designed to fail in as safest way possible. As far as the anomaly on the film, tell me what it is Astro.
@rrussell39 Maybe you missed the speech ex-President Bush gave about how they have never been trained on "people flying airplanes into buildings". Which in fact they did and they've been doing it for a while. All I'm saying is you're wrong to so boldly say this is what I think and now I'm going to turn it into fact, because I'm an 'architect'.
@Razr89A Well I can't tell what you are even bitching about. See it is like this, I have not said a thing about conspiracy, only about what I can Boldly say what I know to be because unlike you, I actually know about structures. You were not being sarcastic when you said you were an Astronaut, you simply realized you couldn't say anything that would hold water, and so you tell me you were kidding. You have YET to tell anyone what it is you think about 9/11? Stop making an ass of yourself. Astro!
@Razr89A Also, what is usually kept in a buildings basement? The building electrical supply which is huge and can explode if shorted. The voltage was most likely 2300 to 480/277 to 120/208. The section of building around impact lost power, but other floors did not. That indicates that the power for those dead floors went out due to shorting the service wires, and could make an oil-filled transformer explode violently and very loudly. Happens quite often in a fire. Always look for the logical!
@rrussell39 *sigh*... Jesus this is becoming an impossibility with you... I'll define sarcasm and then I'll point you to a website, if you do not read the website that I point you to and then ask a question which is already answered in said website, then this discussion is over.
- Sarcasm - witty language used to convey insults or scorn.
- investigate911(dot)org/
There you have it, ^ your answers and the explanation behind me saying astronaut...
That s the missile that was supposed to hit building 7. Now it s not a conspiracy matter but a facing the facts matter, sorry for those who can t accept it, it s hard, yes, Some others are just paid trolls.
@pennydoly If it missed building 7 where do you think this missile that would cause that huge, long lasting liquid fuel explosion with the tell-tale sign of a petroleum explosions black billowing cloud with black soot in the air floating down? Even if it were a dud, its weight,speed and kinetic energy would have done major damage wherever it hit. These are the things that nobody explains along with their theory. There is a distinct difference in a petro's lasting fireball burn vs.solid explosiv
@enlightenedpie Bugs don't materialize out of nothing. It came from out of the smoke. Or thats one really huge bug. Lets put our thinking caps on people.
@enlightenedpie At first glance I thought it was a bug as well. The only problem I noticed is that the "bug" only appears on the right side of the right tower right at the bottom of it's smoke/crash zone. From that point, try to track the bug prior to that point. I cannot see that bug before that point no matter how slowly the video is played at. I have no idea what it is, but it is peculiar.
@vootsak1 Yeah, you forget which one 'cause you don't know what you're talking about. And how much oil are we currently getting out of Iraq? Oh yeah, NONE.
Furthermore, why would our gov't need to stage this murderous attack to get oil from Iraq when gas prices were only $1.50 a gallon in 2001?!
@demoskunk tell me somthing how much stock piles of oil does America have and how much do they use? America is buying oil from other countrys its not using its own oil why because when the oil runs out who is going to have it all? thats right America think of the money they will make.
@vootsak1 We stockpile oil in our strategic reserve in case of an emergency, like a major war, where our oil supply might be cut off. The problem is that we depend on Arab countries for too much of our oil. We should be drilling for more of our own, until we develop real alternatives. I believe this is Obama's plan, and I support him on it.
Wow. You guys should seriously go back to eating paint chips and get the fuck off the internet. You can clearly see the nose of the plane come through the building before exploding. The black blob you see after the explosion is clearly debris. 1 plane with jet fuel can easily take down a building of that size. If you know anything about steel/fire fighting, jet fuel burns at higher temperature than expected. Steel begins to lose its tensile strength at 500 degrees. Collapse at 1000.
@ArRazorbacksrule your wrong bro they way that building came down and the timing was staged if the plane could bring it down it wouldent have taken so long to do the builds came down strte which means demalition was used that how thing was staged
@vootsak1 Seriously dude. It isn't staged. The building collapsed. When the integrity is compromised, it's going to collapse. Just because it went straight down doesn't mean shit. ;) You're arguing with a dude that's been doing fire fighting for 4 years and is in training with it now for the DoD. ;) Please, continue to try me.
@vootsak1 How could the planted demolition charges have survived the impact and the explosions of the planes?! That makes no sense. The bldgs clearly started to collapse where the planes entered them. No controlled, planted demolitions were necessary, or possible either.
did you know that the force of the explosion on 9/11 moved the whole structure of the buildings at least 10 feet, i don't care about things burning etc but if any structure big or small gets hit so hard it's entire structure moves then ofc it's gonna collapse, i cannot believe that some people can be so ignorant to believe that 9/11 was an inside job, it's completely ridiculous and also completely unfair to all the innocent people that lost their lives on that terrible day :( may they R.I.P
ok for one you people act like your so smart but actually there was reportings of ufo sighting before the impact of flight 175 and some believe that it was not a passenger plane but it was and they just could not see the windows.
yea definately a bug dumbass. and to the guy below me thats not the jet engine. u wouldnt be able to see it because its not that big and jet black. jesus their are some retards on this planet
you ediot, that was one of the jet engines from the plane. if you watched the news coverage, continuing into the evening on the that day, you would have seen the one where they found the engine 2-3 blocks away smashed into the front of a building. any more brainbusters?
I dont understand why the planes didnt go all the way through with the speeds they are traveling at wouldnt they have came out the other side and not stopped inside the buildings?? Im being serious can some explain to this to me??
@mommy80908 the buildings were packed with steel and other weaker materials such as wood and metal chairs, imagine an airplane flying though a steel beem as high as the buildings but 20 feet think, it would sink into the beam but not threw it
Itsan insect flying infront of the camera you complete and utter retard. You can clearly see it in two other frames before it reaches the right side of the building. The reason why you don't see clearly at other moments is because the black smoke obscures the dark colors of the superimposed fly or gnat or what ever bug it is. Its morons like you just trying to get attention that ruin it for the rest of conspiracy theorists who do painstaking research to find the truth.
answer me this... in the one video of the second plane crash, there is an explosion sheer milliseconds before the shadow of the plane on the building meets with the actual impact of the plane... and you know, if a shadow doesnt meet the object, its not yet touching, so where did the explosion come from?
oh yeah and the dark thing is probably a fly you can see it overlapping the building up at the top starting from 1:30 this post is either a joke or nutcase or misinformation
@Datacaust no. I noticed this the first time I saw it back in 2001. There is no overlap. this thing is doing mach 3 at least and is behind the towers. F22 Raptor is my guess.
It can be seen in other videos. I have wondered why some editing genius hasn't compiled all the videos into a 3D model. This would prove the faked videos from the real, and give an exact visual description of the event.
explain to me how the steel supports on the building can sucessfully stop a 80 ton vehicle moving at 500 sumthin miles an hour, in its tracks and vaporize all remnants of the plane.... I declare Shenanagans.... the us goverment should be ashamed of their selves...
You believe alum. wings can just go into a steel stucture, like a road runner cartoon,then go back to elem. school, or a doctor, pref. a state hosptial or mental inst,. Take a alum. bat to any thin steel item and see if you can go throw like knife thru butter, will never happen! wings off both planes ANd especally tail fin would have fell to the street, now, NY left a cartoon outline, but in Wash. went into a 15ft. hole, dont beleive popular mech., believe YOUR OWN eyes...!!
it's probably the passport that survived the crash if only the maded the black box out of papper then they could of retrieved all of them.....
TheHarrision 1 year ago 290
Ehhh i think that was a rock.
TheRivalityMaster 1 year ago 67
That is definitely a part of the plane because if you look at it, a dark object goes above the second line of flame darting out, and it goes out of sight, then re-appears as that dark object. It can't be a bird, it's, too large and goes behind the tower.
brandonjsmith1994 1 year ago 29
no missle
it was the jet
wen790 1 year ago 14
Does not really matter just another video of a inside job, atleast the posts here seem to use logic that all this is not possible as told.
RussianKalinka 1 year ago
Bush caused 9/11 and blamed it on iraq.. Y u ask well the us air force was running a simulator on wat would happen if something did hit the twin towers a week before.. also BUSH RECICVED INFO THAT THEIR IS GOING TO BE A ATTACK AND HE PUSHED IT ASIDE AND WENT TO HIS RANCH IN TEXAS.. I HATE U BUSH
USARMY126 1 year ago 6
What the heck is that? It does look like it's coming from behind the North tower.,and toward the camera.
navanod77 1 year ago 13
looks like a job for the men in black
jesterua67 1 year ago 28
what the hell is it? what do you think it is?
Armor71 1 year ago
48 people probablu helped plan this
Chargers166 1 year ago
I bet they landed the planes somewhere and executed all the pasengers
XxGRIZZWALDxX 1 year ago
It looks like a piece of rubble that got shot out from an explosion
Fizzle52 1 year ago
superman
secoo888 1 year ago
Christopher Bollyn cracked this case WIDE OPEN FOLKS.
eckyspondoolie 1 year ago
It enters at the top left or the screen and you can barely see it, it doesn't just come out of no where. It's probably just a fly or something
ItsBrandonNow 1 year ago
No that thing looked like a tiny bit of debris, it doesn't come out the back, how can you even know? It came towards the camera man, if you look at the first normal speed. Then camera guy like flinches and the camera moves. I'd say it's a tiny bit of debris that has been blown towards the caera man.
2Trueforyouu 1 year ago
this is AN UFO????
hanboard 1 year ago
looks like a misile
gooseanus23 1 year ago
I'm curious to know where building 7 is in relation to this video...could that be what caused building 7 to collapse? I agree with maddos26's theory
Swampguana 1 year ago
Comon guys... it's a bird. I'm the biggest believer in the world but this one is silly. You can see it clearly come from the upper left hand side.
redasscd 1 year ago 354
its obviousely part of the plane that caught fire on impact and has carried on traveling at '500'mph out the other side without hitting any obsticles
thendara69 1 year ago
r u on about the thing that wizzez towards the canera? could be a fly passing by at close range.jeez,u americans really r dumb!
thendara69 1 year ago
@thendara69 No, that's not what we're talking about. Judging by your spelling and grammar, I'd say you're the 'dumb' one here. How about you wait for someone to clarify before calling someone dumb.
nexusvision10 1 year ago
wtf was that?
jgraz42 1 year ago
Nice photoshopping, cause I just watched a video showing how to Photoshop somthing into the wtc crash.nice work though.
Kilplixman 1 year ago
WHY WOULD PEOPLE BE ON THE PLANE WHEN WE HAVE REMOTE CONTROLLED TECHNOLOGY. THOSE WERENT NORMAL EVERYDAY PLANES
cameoooful 1 year ago
@cameoooful You go to New York and look the family members of the ones who died in the crashes that their family member didn't actually die. Come on, man.
nexusvision10 1 year ago
its called technology anyone can add anything to video it's not true this bullshit!
msknockout1 1 year ago
It's a bird! LOOK CLOSELY TOO THE TOP RIGHT AND YOU WILL SEE THE FAINT IMAGE IT MAKES PASSING THE CAMERA. It's just startled by the explosion and got the hell out of there. Apply logic and see the simple explanation FIRST people.
dobberdoss 1 year ago
its a fly
tightsharkyj 1 year ago
dude its a fly
saps96 1 year ago
I hope you aren't talking about that black thing, that is obviously some little thing flying in front of the camera. Otherwise it would be about 10 floors high and traveling VERY fast. If you are talking about the fireball that comes out of the building, well that is to be expected when you fly a plane into a building, shit is going to go flying.
Meeksgoo 1 year ago
you should actually do a frame by frame measurement to see how fast it is actually moving. You can easily calibrate your distance by using the width of the Towers.
smitty121981 1 year ago
that,ll be the black box we they coudnae find eh,
badbaldy 1 year ago
Bird.
Soaboe 1 year ago
just a piece of debris,settle yourself...next!
repelghosts 1 year ago
There is a video on youtube titled "ufo grazing wtc building" by magicranch. It shows this very same thing it is not a trick of light and it does not originate from the plane or building. Follow the trajectory in reverse and you will see.
jbowmnt 1 year ago
If the 2 plane was military where is real boeng 747?
mikaonmika 1 year ago
it's probably Bin Laden escaping the blast..i mean he is so invincible he could probably be from planet krypton
Burnedice 1 year ago
is it just me or does it seem to be coming from behind the building?
TheAlmightyChris1 1 year ago
that must be a ufo or some paranormal theory like the satan flying out or a ufo coming out after osama hit the building r.i.p for all the people who died
TheAlmightyChris1 1 year ago 2
that must be a fucking ufo bitches!!!
TheAlmightyChris1 1 year ago
It's Cloverfield
armasiel 1 year ago
That object was so close to the camera it has the effect of moving fast. It doesnt even look like it came from the south tower. It starts above the north tower moving fast looks large if it had hit the ground at that rate and size there would be damage noted. Its probably a bug or something of the sorts close enough to the camera to give the effect of a large fast moving object coming from the tower. IF this same film was done with a high speed camera we could see what it was.
InlineFury 1 year ago
Its not anything i know thats its not a space ship
1crazyfoolman 1 year ago
LOL? ARE YOU KIDDING ME ? ITS A FLIE OR SOMETHING ?
IrGinX 1 year ago
it would have move the smoke for the bldg
christianvenida 1 year ago
ok so Al Gore didn't win elections for a reason against Bush
so they bought it out and won elections (bush)
then make a reason to attack another country for money (oil)
few yrs later its time to earn some money back (war)
thats the way i see it
he learned from hes dad ...
BlaBlaidc 1 year ago
bug
dinibobini 1 year ago
i almost said its possibly bits of building or plane but it couldnt have reached so far away from the tower so quick as that..wierd and everything about that day is getting wierder
aFreshStart2010 1 year ago
U want to know what that little black thing is ?
I tell u, its the rest of the holographic plane!
Think about that, a second.
inuisthetruth 1 year ago 2
My assumption is the dark object (seen in a steep angle dive from other perspectives) is the device that was 'training' the 'targeting lazer' on the second tower, to guide the remote controlled aircraft directly into the targeted area, where even more ordinance was placed in the structure. Youtube has more footage of an 'inferred targeting laser(military hardware) ' being 'trained on the building, slightly above the aircratt 'impact zone.
PDSalling 1 year ago
It's the Ghost Effect... where if you think you're in a haunted house, every damn spec of dust in the camera is ectoplasm and every reflection is proof of a ghost.
Jockkle 1 year ago
anybody who looks at this footage and believes that is a passenger jet liner,is either blind or just a fucking idiot. slow down the playback before the "plane" hits and you can clearly see that it is a missle. and you dont have to be a science professor to understand that it is impossible for the aluminum nose of a jet to make it through those steel coloums and come out the other side nose in tact...WAKE UP YOU FUCKING MORONS. Sept 11 2001, signified the true beginning of the end.
TRUTHSOLOW 1 year ago
Wtf?
Theonewhois1000 1 year ago
Wtf?
Theonewhois1000 1 year ago
Great footage!
NeaFrea 1 year ago
Are they talking about the object that flies over the CBS logo? If so, it's a bug. You can see it fly between the camera and the second tower. You don't see it enter frame because of the smoke. Watch the top of the second tower and you see it pass by. Damn flying cockroaches.
DingbattJohnny 1 year ago
its missile :p
4511394 1 year ago
See you in the Gulag.
megaseth7 1 year ago
At 1:03 , The 3rd plane of 9/11 can be seen as a white object ! Take a look !
JoshyMoz1 1 year ago
it could be anything… a bug, a bird taking a shit, bits of debris at a deceiving angle… don't look too much into it
by the way, I thought you were talking about the black bit to the right of the North Tower, which is just very dark smoke from the plane impact
only4tsc 1 year ago
This is the stupidest shit I have ever heard. If you hit a fixed object while going over 100mph not wearing a set belt you will exit the vehicle because of continued inertia, hit a second stationary object and it will change your direction again.
frankt04 1 year ago
Looks like its closer to the cam, but comes from behind the tower. I was gonna say a UAV, there was at least one filmed that day, but this is sooo fast. Not sure, but very interesting.
elrugged1 1 year ago
IT SEEM LIKE IT WAS TRAVELLING WITH THE PLANE... I BELIEVE SOMETHING EVIL (IF NOT HIMSELF) WAS GUIDING THE BEASTS TO THIS TRAGEDY. AWFUL, DISGUSTING AND NOTHING WHICH DESERVE TO BE ATTENTION PAYED TO. OUR LOVED ONES REMAINS WITH GOD AND WE ARE STILL ALIVE, REJECTING THIS LOW LEVEL ACTS. LIVES CAN BE CEASED, BUT LOVE AND FAITH IN GOD IS ETERNAL.
SweetPativrata 1 year ago
that object that is shooting from the side of the tower is what is known as a "squib". A squib is the repercussion of a small explosive detonation in CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS. if you've seen other WTC footage and compare them to controlled demolition footage, you'll notice that there are many of these squibs occurring in random places around the building. Their purpose is to break the building's structure internally so it makes a clean and easy free-fall, instead of a toppling mess. DONT BE BLIND!
mahem3 1 year ago
Not sure which object you are worried about - one is clearly debris from the aircraft that has continued through with the momentum of such a large aircraft hitting at high speed (oh sorry I forgot it was added by animation!!) The other is nothing to do with either an is close to the camera if you play the clip from about the 50sec point and look at the top left hand corner of the picture it flies infront of the building. I'm not sure what it is but it's does not look sinister!!
graeme140677 1 year ago
...And if we're talking about the bit of debris then it's just debris right?
Martinn56 1 year ago
Seriously, all it can be is a bug or something.
The US Goverment did this though, kthnx.
Martinn56 1 year ago
its fast and not kidding yew looking at it slowly ity looks like superman
peterpamanez 1 year ago
it looks like a helicopter
peterpamanez 1 year ago
thats the engine ... .they found the engine several weeks later a few blocks away on top of a building
iceychill64 1 year ago
first off, it should be "its angle is different" not "it's angle is different". Why can't conspiracy theorists every spell correctly?
sennichi98 1 year ago
Nah, it someone that flew out of the plane =.="
gregoryteo 1 year ago
What's with the glowing, white UFO traveling from the buildings and vanishing into thin air?
forrykid 1 year ago
what the hell is it?
EmilyPottergirl1515 1 year ago
probly was the plane's front wheel.. who knows
malxx16 1 year ago
thats not a bug its going to fast and if u notice after the black object goes some white objects follow it right next to the twin towers.....
cassie120216 1 year ago
Missle.
mystacall 1 year ago
moth mann!DADA DAAAAAAAAAAAAA
RayRay2242 1 year ago
"ufo in video of the 9/11"
name of another video where you can see this object
BvBMaRc09 1 year ago
it was a bug u can see when its in super slowmo when u look at the smoke from the first tower that it comes from the corner of the camra
hfiti 1 year ago
but yeah i dont know what it is. but just that shadow from the smoke. its very sus
Rawrrrxxxx 1 year ago
if you look in the smoke, you can see theres a shadow, that seems to be the same as the dark object you see in the sky,
Rawrrrxxxx 1 year ago
loose change.WATCH.
jadeit0basia 1 year ago
Someone should try slowing down the footage from a different angle.Might be worth looking to see if it happened during first hit.Could be a bug.But it does look like it comes from the wtc.
pdjbuzz51 1 year ago
guys i am a muslim and i dont agree with all this theory that the videos that we all se is made by the media. the two towers was hit by planes and the terrorist where inside of it. But they must had a very strong link in the inside of the goverment to succeed in a operation like this. So i think that the terrorist where helpd by som ppl from the goverment.
massod26 1 year ago
@massod26 :) If the government didn't do it they at the very least let it happen.
10baseer 1 year ago
@massod26 why would they need a link with the government to succeed at this operation
jimmaa66 1 year ago
@massod26 Please explain to me HOW you "know" the "terrorists were inside" when NO ONE could possibly have "known" or "seen" that?
hddragracer1 1 year ago
Google "Operation Northwoods", it was a plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation,
Operation Northwoods included proposals for hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government.
chrisvelos1 1 year ago 24
Is it just me or does it seem to be coming from behind the building?
morjek 1 year ago
@morjek i agreee
rawrarwrladybug 1 year ago
@morjek yes, behind
hddragracer1 1 year ago
all you retards who say it's a bug, learn to pay closer attention, he's not talking about the fucking bug that flies in front of the camera before the impact, he's talking about the piece of debris that comes shooting out of the building after the fireball. which seems a bit late. all the other debris came out with the fire then after the fireball has reached it's maximum distance from the building something comes barreling through... Don't know what it is but it's not traveling at 5000mph.
ender7718 1 year ago
@ender7718 wow you fucking idiot.... its called REALITY!!!!!!!! thats not what he talking about thats perfectly normal for an explosion!
Greenday740 1 year ago
There is footage from another angle, on the opposite side and farther away, where you can see this object and how fast it travels to catch up to the explosion when it happens. Another, where a triangular shaped craft zips between the towers. Orbs in the smoke above the towers right before they explode and collapse. They were all over the sky on this day.
DHMIII 1 year ago
@DHMIII
Where are those vids? I can't find them. Links?
op684 1 year ago
debris, a bird, Idk
HariPuttar1 1 year ago
@HariPuttar1 a bird? Did you really say that? Are you daft?
hddragracer1 1 year ago
editing?
belmarfilms 1 year ago
It might of been a bit of the plane?
Talk2Dahand100 1 year ago
debris
dancestar704 1 year ago
Looks like a bug or something, lol
But you say behind the BUILD, that black think in close to camera isnt behind build, it´s in front the camera, lol xD
TigerNrOne 1 year ago
is a bird..an look fast becuse i very close cam..thats it..then this ´mysterium is out of world..on less you never have seen scare bird before
MultiAirbrusher 1 year ago
LOL!...a fly or some other bug.
croarmy666 1 year ago
this was the landing gear look it up dude ..the landing gear from the second plane was found blocks away from world trade
Famous1809 1 year ago
@Famous1809
Yeah right, anything other than what it has to be. If you look really close and open your eyes, you'll see it comes from behind the north tower at a steep angle, and is definitely not debris from the south tower, which isn't even close to being that far away from the south tower yet.
Also, the object is traveling at least 10 times faster than the aircraft or any of the debris. If the aircraft was travelling at 500 mph, then the object is travelling at least 5000 mph.
IDislikeCowards 1 year ago
Dude that's like a fly or something WTF!!
lagartija4 1 year ago 2
ufo
Yankie33 1 year ago
Aliens..... or a bug
Edgehead178 1 year ago
can someone tell what it is?
ekamau20 1 year ago
what? a fuckin fly or a wasp or something like that? get a life you sad cunt1
phucoff1 1 year ago
So what? lol
zwalrus1 1 year ago
Criminal Elements within the US Government
staged a "False Flag" Terror Attack on its own
citizens, in order to manipulate public
perceptions into supporting its agenda.
They have been doing these for years.
911 was an Inside Job.
xd34dlyn1nj4x 1 year ago
Criminal Elements within the US Government
staged a "False Flag" Terror Attack on its own
citizens, in order to manipulate public
perceptions into supporting its agenda.
They have been doing these for years.
911 was an Inside Job.
xd34dlyn1nj4x 1 year ago
Looks like it might be one of the engines. Small, high mass, taking deflection from the impacts. Don't seem that much odd about it.
star13uk 1 year ago
@star13uk
The engines don't travel ahead of the plane, nor do they travel at 5000 mph.
IDislikeCowards 1 year ago 8
@IDislikeCowards Engines would travel ahead of the plane because they are carrying all the weight so if it comes off it will keep the momment up and the plane will stay at the same pace. especualy if the plane comes to a stop very quickly.
benjy94benjy 1 year ago
@benjy94benjy There were no "engines" found.
hddragracer1 1 year ago
@IDislikeCowards a fly at 1 inch does
angelasovercoat 1 year ago
@IDislikeCowards that was a bird
cubes887 1 year ago
It looks like that thing was going so fast that it busted some of the windows.
20125150 1 year ago
People, don't waste your time arguing with the trolls that are paid to go along with the gov lies. Truthers kids can say, "My daddy is not a coward and will stand up to the evil bastards that really did this." The gov story's kids can say, "Darn,....My dad is a wussy that sold out to the greedy zionists. Shoot fire, I wish my Dad had the brains and the guts to be honest in the face of traitors and greedy lieing murderers." That is what it boils down to. So go justify why you went along.
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
what if it was a stupid bug passing throw the camera the bug wa probably in a rush
crazylegoangel 1 year ago
did you ever think that it couldve been debris?
MrGuner02 1 year ago
I am an Architect and it is well known in the Architect community that these buildings, givin the congestion of the area were actually designed with point of the structure intentionally designed to pancake straight down. That is why so many people think it was imploded, because they do not know these things. It is a fact. And thank god it did pancake instead of fall over. It would have still killed all in the building plus thousands in smaller buildings and streets if it fell over across1091 ft.
rrussell39 1 year ago
@rrussell39 I am an Astronaut of the Astronaut community. I don't care who you are or what you say, you can't deny facts and cover up evidence, you just can't. Ever see the video of the owner of the two buildings? Or what about the firefighters underground that heard explosions, the ones who survived told the story, but I guess you already knew that, and then your large knowledge-base on buildings must allow you to figure out how they exactly fell, because you know... your an architect...
Razr89A 1 year ago
@Razr89A OK Rocket Man, First off I was replying to what Janet Amelia had to say. I wasn't even caring what the "thing" that appeared to shoot out of the building across to the lower portion of the screen was. Second, WTF got your space panties in a wad in your personal attack reply? I am an Architect, with a 2nd degree in Mech. Engineering as well. I don't care if you believe me, it's irrelevant. And I am right on the collapse. As far as the streak? What do you as an Astronaut think it is?
rrussell39 1 year ago
@Razr89A I never addressed anything about a cover up or anything did I? All I did was explain that those building were designed to fail exactly the way they did. When those buildings were built in the 60's, they were rated for a full speed 707 airliner hit, but unfortunately nobody had the foresight to imagine bigger heavier planes. All building that tall have a failure threshold, and are designed to fail in as safest way possible. As far as the anomaly on the film, tell me what it is Astro.
rrussell39 1 year ago
@rrussell39 Maybe you missed the speech ex-President Bush gave about how they have never been trained on "people flying airplanes into buildings". Which in fact they did and they've been doing it for a while. All I'm saying is you're wrong to so boldly say this is what I think and now I'm going to turn it into fact, because I'm an 'architect'.
Razr89A 1 year ago
@Razr89A Well I can't tell what you are even bitching about. See it is like this, I have not said a thing about conspiracy, only about what I can Boldly say what I know to be because unlike you, I actually know about structures. You were not being sarcastic when you said you were an Astronaut, you simply realized you couldn't say anything that would hold water, and so you tell me you were kidding. You have YET to tell anyone what it is you think about 9/11? Stop making an ass of yourself. Astro!
rrussell39 1 year ago
@Razr89A Also, what is usually kept in a buildings basement? The building electrical supply which is huge and can explode if shorted. The voltage was most likely 2300 to 480/277 to 120/208. The section of building around impact lost power, but other floors did not. That indicates that the power for those dead floors went out due to shorting the service wires, and could make an oil-filled transformer explode violently and very loudly. Happens quite often in a fire. Always look for the logical!
rrussell39 1 year ago
@rrussell39 *sigh*... Jesus this is becoming an impossibility with you... I'll define sarcasm and then I'll point you to a website, if you do not read the website that I point you to and then ask a question which is already answered in said website, then this discussion is over.
- Sarcasm - witty language used to convey insults or scorn.
- investigate911(dot)org/
There you have it, ^ your answers and the explanation behind me saying astronaut...
Razr89A 1 year ago
@rrussell39 why would they design something with the intention of having it fall? that doesnt make sense.
Rcoleman51 1 year ago
It's a fly
Metaldragon31 1 year ago
@Expertuzo: many buildings are designed to implode. Especially those in grossly populated areas....such as NYC and L.A
JanetAmelia 1 year ago
@JanetAmelia Very true
rrussell39 1 year ago
its the chupacabra
boxerrick86 1 year ago
i think its a plate from the plane
skilomiel1 1 year ago
That s the missile that was supposed to hit building 7. Now it s not a conspiracy matter but a facing the facts matter, sorry for those who can t accept it, it s hard, yes, Some others are just paid trolls.
pennydoly 1 year ago
@pennydoly If it missed building 7 where do you think this missile that would cause that huge, long lasting liquid fuel explosion with the tell-tale sign of a petroleum explosions black billowing cloud with black soot in the air floating down? Even if it were a dud, its weight,speed and kinetic energy would have done major damage wherever it hit. These are the things that nobody explains along with their theory. There is a distinct difference in a petro's lasting fireball burn vs.solid explosiv
rrussell39 1 year ago
Are you a moron? It's debris from the plane or the bldg, obviously.
demoskunk 1 year ago
F-22 Raptor, w/o thermate missiles anymore.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
dudes, its a ufo. 9/11 is strongly connected with alien life.
tarzanjosh905 1 year ago
uhhh, yeah... it's a bug... not everything is a clue
enlightenedpie 1 year ago 4
@enlightenedpie Bugs don't materialize out of nothing. It came from out of the smoke. Or thats one really huge bug. Lets put our thinking caps on people.
DHMIII 1 year ago
@enlightenedpie I agree its a bug
Davis4037 1 year ago
@enlightenedpie At first glance I thought it was a bug as well. The only problem I noticed is that the "bug" only appears on the right side of the right tower right at the bottom of it's smoke/crash zone. From that point, try to track the bug prior to that point. I cannot see that bug before that point no matter how slowly the video is played at. I have no idea what it is, but it is peculiar.
stravok 1 year ago
Hmm wth is that?
AL3X7355 1 year ago
just a Bee or a Flea
jukka1996 1 year ago
the goverment was behind 9/11 not the al quida
the americans needed a resion to get the oil from iraq or iran (i forget which one) so they do these and blame it on the al quida
vootsak1 1 year ago
best comment ever!
00dom00 1 year ago
@vootsak1 Yeah, you forget which one 'cause you don't know what you're talking about. And how much oil are we currently getting out of Iraq? Oh yeah, NONE.
Furthermore, why would our gov't need to stage this murderous attack to get oil from Iraq when gas prices were only $1.50 a gallon in 2001?!
Idiot.
demoskunk 1 year ago
@demoskunk tell me somthing how much stock piles of oil does America have and how much do they use? America is buying oil from other countrys its not using its own oil why because when the oil runs out who is going to have it all? thats right America think of the money they will make.
vootsak1 1 year ago
@vootsak1 We stockpile oil in our strategic reserve in case of an emergency, like a major war, where our oil supply might be cut off. The problem is that we depend on Arab countries for too much of our oil. We should be drilling for more of our own, until we develop real alternatives. I believe this is Obama's plan, and I support him on it.
demoskunk 1 year ago
Wow. You guys should seriously go back to eating paint chips and get the fuck off the internet. You can clearly see the nose of the plane come through the building before exploding. The black blob you see after the explosion is clearly debris. 1 plane with jet fuel can easily take down a building of that size. If you know anything about steel/fire fighting, jet fuel burns at higher temperature than expected. Steel begins to lose its tensile strength at 500 degrees. Collapse at 1000.
ArRazorbacksrule 1 year ago
@ArRazorbacksrule your wrong bro they way that building came down and the timing was staged if the plane could bring it down it wouldent have taken so long to do the builds came down strte which means demalition was used that how thing was staged
vootsak1 1 year ago
@vootsak1 Seriously dude. It isn't staged. The building collapsed. When the integrity is compromised, it's going to collapse. Just because it went straight down doesn't mean shit. ;) You're arguing with a dude that's been doing fire fighting for 4 years and is in training with it now for the DoD. ;) Please, continue to try me.
ArRazorbacksrule 1 year ago
@vootsak1 How could the planted demolition charges have survived the impact and the explosions of the planes?! That makes no sense. The bldgs clearly started to collapse where the planes entered them. No controlled, planted demolitions were necessary, or possible either.
demoskunk 1 year ago
Its this Passwort flying out on the other side of the Building! ;-)
SdH76zhEU 1 year ago
did you know that the force of the explosion on 9/11 moved the whole structure of the buildings at least 10 feet, i don't care about things burning etc but if any structure big or small gets hit so hard it's entire structure moves then ofc it's gonna collapse, i cannot believe that some people can be so ignorant to believe that 9/11 was an inside job, it's completely ridiculous and also completely unfair to all the innocent people that lost their lives on that terrible day :( may they R.I.P
AlgidAssassin 1 year ago
@AlgidAssassin 10 feet? I doubt that
NJHater 1 year ago
probely something of the building or plane exploded and flew away
Isudor 1 year ago
ok for one you people act like your so smart but actually there was reportings of ufo sighting before the impact of flight 175 and some believe that it was not a passenger plane but it was and they just could not see the windows.
wokapiwokan 1 year ago
yea definately a bug dumbass. and to the guy below me thats not the jet engine. u wouldnt be able to see it because its not that big and jet black. jesus their are some retards on this planet
justintime1824 1 year ago
you ediot, that was one of the jet engines from the plane. if you watched the news coverage, continuing into the evening on the that day, you would have seen the one where they found the engine 2-3 blocks away smashed into the front of a building. any more brainbusters?
reedbrad2009 1 year ago
I dont understand why the planes didnt go all the way through with the speeds they are traveling at wouldnt they have came out the other side and not stopped inside the buildings?? Im being serious can some explain to this to me??
mommy80908 1 year ago
@mommy80908 the buildings were packed with steel and other weaker materials such as wood and metal chairs, imagine an airplane flying though a steel beem as high as the buildings but 20 feet think, it would sink into the beam but not threw it
wshockey617 1 year ago
Itsan insect flying infront of the camera you complete and utter retard. You can clearly see it in two other frames before it reaches the right side of the building. The reason why you don't see clearly at other moments is because the black smoke obscures the dark colors of the superimposed fly or gnat or what ever bug it is. Its morons like you just trying to get attention that ruin it for the rest of conspiracy theorists who do painstaking research to find the truth.
ehermes83 1 year ago
answer me this... in the one video of the second plane crash, there is an explosion sheer milliseconds before the shadow of the plane on the building meets with the actual impact of the plane... and you know, if a shadow doesnt meet the object, its not yet touching, so where did the explosion come from?
LarocqueSSR 1 year ago
oh yeah and the dark thing is probably a fly you can see it overlapping the building up at the top starting from 1:30 this post is either a joke or nutcase or misinformation
designed to make truthers look retarded
Datacaust 1 year ago
@Datacaust no. I noticed this the first time I saw it back in 2001. There is no overlap. this thing is doing mach 3 at least and is behind the towers. F22 Raptor is my guess.
It can be seen in other videos. I have wondered why some editing genius hasn't compiled all the videos into a 3D model. This would prove the faked videos from the real, and give an exact visual description of the event.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
@Datacaust Thruthers don't need any help to look retarded! They're doing a fine job at it all by them selves!!
Some1fromYurp 1 year ago
explain to me how the steel supports on the building can sucessfully stop a 80 ton vehicle moving at 500 sumthin miles an hour, in its tracks and vaporize all remnants of the plane.... I declare Shenanagans.... the us goverment should be ashamed of their selves...
414myniggaz 1 year ago
Are you talking about the bug that flies in front of the camera? Its not very clear what you mean.
HConstantine 1 year ago
You believe alum. wings can just go into a steel stucture, like a road runner cartoon,then go back to elem. school, or a doctor, pref. a state hosptial or mental inst,. Take a alum. bat to any thin steel item and see if you can go throw like knife thru butter, will never happen! wings off both planes ANd especally tail fin would have fell to the street, now, NY left a cartoon outline, but in Wash. went into a 15ft. hole, dont beleive popular mech., believe YOUR OWN eyes...!!
tone4624 1 year ago
@tone4624
F=MA. You tell me when you can swing your baseball bat at 600 miles per hour.
HConstantine 1 year ago