Well honestly I would love to be able to use wikipedia but it has screwed me over countless times with the mass amounts of false and edited data it holds. Wolfram alpha has not failed me yet (with false knowledge) But using Wolfram|Alpha as an encyclopedia is highly illogical.
Really? I could be wrong. That doesn't seem to be what is implied by this video. So when I ask for the unemployment rate in England, will it show more than one graph from more than one source?
This video is stupid, you can't compare these two websites, they are completely different...Its like comparing a Caribbean-grown banana to a piece of mature cheddar cheese. 1Star, i subscribed, then unsubscribed.
Yes but surely you are aware that WA is still in developement stage, and its purpose is mainly oriented to computation and synthesis of web content while wikipedia is nothing but a CMS edited by everyone, even though it is a great tool.
Future predictions for WA are immencely great, not even comprehendible to most of people according to our present standards. It is the future of super intelligence.
Well honestly I would love to be able to use wikipedia but it has screwed me over countless times with the mass amounts of false and edited data it holds. Wolfram alpha has not failed me yet (with false knowledge) But using Wolfram|Alpha as an encyclopedia is highly illogical.
pedobearmaniac 4 months ago
can someone tell me what that song playing in background ?
Slacker4o 1 year ago
what a horrible example of what Wolfram Alpha could do... its revolutionary and you try to use it like an encyclopedia? Shame on you.
96shox 1 year ago
You should zoom into the screen when you type text.
GeoffreyBernardo 2 years ago
Wolfram Alpha is a great idea but its flaw is that it only shows the result from one source.
Question. Why did we invade Iraq?
Answer: Because they have WMDs.
gadzometer 2 years ago
really.
Before posting, You could also clicking the Source Information. Then you would know, that your answer is completely wrong.
deimudda92 2 years ago
Really? I could be wrong. That doesn't seem to be what is implied by this video. So when I ask for the unemployment rate in England, will it show more than one graph from more than one source?
gadzometer 2 years ago
This video is stupid, you can't compare these two websites, they are completely different...Its like comparing a Caribbean-grown banana to a piece of mature cheddar cheese. 1Star, i subscribed, then unsubscribed.
0Linerider0forever0 2 years ago
Yes but surely you are aware that WA is still in developement stage, and its purpose is mainly oriented to computation and synthesis of web content while wikipedia is nothing but a CMS edited by everyone, even though it is a great tool.
Future predictions for WA are immencely great, not even comprehendible to most of people according to our present standards. It is the future of super intelligence.
daredevillive 2 years ago
if your going to compare 2 websites i would give more than 1 example
warlordgeneral 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Wolfram Alpha is an epic fail when you look up things not related to numbers.
rj6v 2 years ago
no its not rj6v
mrsal511 2 years ago
Please view in HD mode
ady1689 2 years ago
They should make wolfram alpha available in german! :(
0supermaster0 2 years ago 3
interesant :D
peterushhh 2 years ago