Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on" Therfore, any ban is encroaching on a citizens right to keep and bear arms
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
Also if you do agree with the second amendment, then you should agree with the owning of anytype of firearm, disreagardlis of what type of action it employes. Look at the exact wording of the 2nd amendment. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Let me repeat, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Again this is the imporatant part SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Also, if you "do" agree with the second amendment, then you should agree with the owning of anytype of firearm, disreagardlis of what type of action it employes. Look at the exact wording of the 2nd amendment. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Let me repeat, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Again this is the imporatant part SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Also, if you "do" agree with the second amendment, then you should agree with the owning of anytype of firearm, disreagardlis of what type of action it employes. Look at the exact wording of the 2nd amendment. "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Let me repeat, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Again this is the imporatant part SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Also, if you "do" agree with the second amendment, then you should agree with the owning of anytype of firearm, disreagardlis of what type of action it employes. Look at the exact wording of the 2nd amendment. "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Let me repeat, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Again this is the imporatant part SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Dude, you must be a fu*king retard. Gun laws do not work. Strict gun laws only keep guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens who only use them if their life, or others are in danger of a criminal. 2. Police rarly get to the scene of a crime in time to stop a crime, murder, etc. Therefore you have the right to protect yourself and stand your ground. I.E. the castle doctrine. 3.In every instance when sticter gun laws are imposed violent crimes increase. Were they are loose crime rates fall.
@GregEScott Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on" Therfore, any ban encroaches apon the people right to keep and bear arms
I love how retards try to speak on issues in which they have no understanding. Do u know how hard and expensive it is to buy a fully automatic firearm? NO. Do you know what semi-automatic means? NO. Do you think citizens who are eligible to own full auto weapons are gunna go out and spray people down? NO. In fact those who are able to own such firearms have proven themselves save and responsible to society, hence the FBI granting the right to own such weapons. So maybe use your little brain
shut the fuck up, you've probably been bullied all through school and now is seeking revenge. get fucking lose you twerp. it's because your such a fucking snot nose little bitch that's why you probably didn't have it easy growing you faggot.
Here is another example of an uniformed anti-gun advocate who doesn't know that the most citizens are not allowed to get automatics. Also, way to contradict yourself. First you say that people have the right to bear arms. Then you say that the government should take arms away.
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE GUN CONTROL MEANS USING 2 HANDS, THE SECOND AMMENDMENT DOESNT SAY SHIT ABOUT WHAT KIND OF WEAPON YOU CAN CARRY. IF YOU MAKE STRICTER LAWS, ONLY THE FUCKIN CRIMINALS WILL GET THEIR HANDS ON SEMI AUTOMATIC AND FULL AUTOMATIC WEAPONS (AS OF RIGHT NOW MOSTLY CRIMINALS ARE GETTING THEIR HANDS ON FULL AUTOS, YOU NEED A SPECIAL PERMIT TO GET ONE LEGALLY)
People should be limited to owning and carrying weapons only if they can afford to pay for them. I don't want anyone carrying a weapon that they have stolen.
just because something exists, doesn't mean its good, or we should have them. seems to be a pretty bad argument. We have starving people in the US, should we not try to do something about that.
I think the point of the video is that we should not have automatic weapons.
"Why do we need X type of weapons?" Because they exist. Like many, you fail to understand the PURPOSE of the 2nd Amendment. It is:
To guard against tyranny in the government.
We [the people] wouldn't need X type of weapons if the government didn't gave them too. How can a people hold a government accountable if the people must gain that governments approval? They cannot.
If you don't understand this point, you don't understand the fundamental architecture of a free republic.
yeah, what is wrong with a semi-automatic weapon? do you realize the only difference between a semi and a manual weapon is that you have to either cock or pump a manual weapon, a semi auto automatically recocks the weapon but requires and additional trigger pull... whereas an automatic weapon 'sprays' bullets with one pull of a trigger.... nothing wrong with semi's...
Hey its none of your business what I want if I get it legally, if you don't want them then don't own one but keep out of my business.
MrGazrp 6 months ago
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
GregEScott 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
GregEScott 6 months ago
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on" Therfore, any ban is encroaching on a citizens right to keep and bear arms
GregEScott 6 months ago
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
GregEScott 6 months ago
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
GregEScott 6 months ago
Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. First, look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on".
GregEScott 6 months ago
Also if you do agree with the second amendment, then you should agree with the owning of anytype of firearm, disreagardlis of what type of action it employes. Look at the exact wording of the 2nd amendment. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Let me repeat, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Again this is the imporatant part SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
GregEScott 6 months ago
Also, if you "do" agree with the second amendment, then you should agree with the owning of anytype of firearm, disreagardlis of what type of action it employes. Look at the exact wording of the 2nd amendment. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Let me repeat, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Again this is the imporatant part SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
GregEScott 6 months ago
Also, if you "do" agree with the second amendment, then you should agree with the owning of anytype of firearm, disreagardlis of what type of action it employes. Look at the exact wording of the 2nd amendment. "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Let me repeat, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Again this is the imporatant part SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
GregEScott 6 months ago
Also, if you "do" agree with the second amendment, then you should agree with the owning of anytype of firearm, disreagardlis of what type of action it employes. Look at the exact wording of the 2nd amendment. "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Let me repeat, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Again this is the imporatant part SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
GregEScott 6 months ago
Dude, you must be a fu*king retard. Gun laws do not work. Strict gun laws only keep guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens who only use them if their life, or others are in danger of a criminal. 2. Police rarly get to the scene of a crime in time to stop a crime, murder, etc. Therefore you have the right to protect yourself and stand your ground. I.E. the castle doctrine. 3.In every instance when sticter gun laws are imposed violent crimes increase. Were they are loose crime rates fall.
GregEScott 6 months ago
@GregEScott Also if you agree with the amendment then you must agree with the ownership of full auto & semi auto guns. look at the exact wording of the amendement. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed Now the key part is "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" The Merriam Websters dictionary definition of INFRENGE IS "to encroach on" Therfore, any ban encroaches apon the people right to keep and bear arms
GregEScott 6 months ago
The only reason I carry a semi-automatic.....is because I can't carry a fully automatic!!
ironshadow750 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shut up faggot. you have no friends
preemz10314 9 months ago
I love how retards try to speak on issues in which they have no understanding. Do u know how hard and expensive it is to buy a fully automatic firearm? NO. Do you know what semi-automatic means? NO. Do you think citizens who are eligible to own full auto weapons are gunna go out and spray people down? NO. In fact those who are able to own such firearms have proven themselves save and responsible to society, hence the FBI granting the right to own such weapons. So maybe use your little brain
sshukri0 9 months ago
You are aware automatics are very rare, hard to get, require a special license and have only been involved in a few(very few) crimes since the 1980s?
shananagans5 9 months ago
i would love to beat the shit out of this fucking fag.
blaziankhmer 9 months ago
shut the fuck up, you've probably been bullied all through school and now is seeking revenge. get fucking lose you twerp. it's because your such a fucking snot nose little bitch that's why you probably didn't have it easy growing you faggot.
blaziankhmer 9 months ago
Here is another example of an uniformed anti-gun advocate who doesn't know that the most citizens are not allowed to get automatics. Also, way to contradict yourself. First you say that people have the right to bear arms. Then you say that the government should take arms away.
21davisa 9 months ago
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE GUN CONTROL MEANS USING 2 HANDS, THE SECOND AMMENDMENT DOESNT SAY SHIT ABOUT WHAT KIND OF WEAPON YOU CAN CARRY. IF YOU MAKE STRICTER LAWS, ONLY THE FUCKIN CRIMINALS WILL GET THEIR HANDS ON SEMI AUTOMATIC AND FULL AUTOMATIC WEAPONS (AS OF RIGHT NOW MOSTLY CRIMINALS ARE GETTING THEIR HANDS ON FULL AUTOS, YOU NEED A SPECIAL PERMIT TO GET ONE LEGALLY)
TKKskynyrd 9 months ago
People should be limited to owning and carrying weapons only if they can afford to pay for them. I don't want anyone carrying a weapon that they have stolen.
acoow 11 months ago
your face looks you got a load of sperm in it lol. your an idiot... the second amendment gives the right to bear arms not what kind
Swagger556 1 year ago
just because something exists, doesn't mean its good, or we should have them. seems to be a pretty bad argument. We have starving people in the US, should we not try to do something about that.
I think the point of the video is that we should not have automatic weapons.
tvtechie09 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tvtechie09 ok... tell me why
ericsyutubeaccount 1 year ago
"Why do we need X type of weapons?" Because they exist. Like many, you fail to understand the PURPOSE of the 2nd Amendment. It is:
To guard against tyranny in the government.
We [the people] wouldn't need X type of weapons if the government didn't gave them too. How can a people hold a government accountable if the people must gain that governments approval? They cannot.
If you don't understand this point, you don't understand the fundamental architecture of a free republic.
astalker 2 years ago 2
Automatics are essentially banned for civilian use.
To date, not a single gun control law has been proven effective. Why then do you want more laws that don't work?
To be honest you don't seem familiar with gun laws at all, especially considering your "Where they can carry them" argument...
WeAreTheMilitia 3 years ago
You are asking the wrong question. See my video response.
DeadeyeKeith 3 years ago
also, enforcement of the current laws is better than additional laws that will go unenforced...
mperkins7705 3 years ago
yeah, what is wrong with a semi-automatic weapon? do you realize the only difference between a semi and a manual weapon is that you have to either cock or pump a manual weapon, a semi auto automatically recocks the weapon but requires and additional trigger pull... whereas an automatic weapon 'sprays' bullets with one pull of a trigger.... nothing wrong with semi's...
mperkins7705 3 years ago
I do support the 2nd amendment, but the only probelm is the more you put laws on guns, the more criminals want them.
SupportRepublicans 3 years ago
too bad criminals and terrorists don't care about laws.
centurion10000000234 3 years ago
dumb ass.
FlwaterSaver 3 years ago 2
Keep your laws off my guns, Kylein2012!!!!!
gkmetty4 3 years ago