Brilliant performance, shame that there's a sign saying "no to nuclear power" on the stage.
In short, if you say "no to nuclear power" you're denying the world of the cleanest, most efficient and longest lasting resource for energy production currently known to science - fusion.
I'll admit we're a few decades from actual fusion generators, but we'll get there eventually and when we do, coal, oil, gas, wind, wave and solar will become virtually pointless.
Nuclear fusion doesn't produce radioactive waste like nuclear fission does.
If my understanding of fusion is correct then the only bi-products of the reaction are helium, heat and (anti)neutrinos (you need not worry about them though - you have trillions of them passing through your body every second)
You may know that we will have a shortage of helium in around 20 years, so that bi-product is actually useful!
Nuclear Fission is a little less environmentally friendly though.
@wwwuvrxcom and therein lies the beauty of fusion (NOT THE SAME AS FISSION), only a very very small amount of nuclear fuel is needed to produce vast amounts of energy. Furthermore the waste from fission lasts 500 years before it loses it's 'radioactiveness', whereas the waste from fusion lasts only 100 years which is far easier to use on an industrial scale (big as it sounds). Plus, carbon emissions = ZERO.
@criticismD93 I don't appreciate it when people try to deny that nuclear is the way forward. Though I would change my views slightly by adding that other 'green' methods should be just part of our energy generation.
jacks dimpels<33 so cute
lovedbeckham23 2 months ago
Brilliant performance, shame that there's a sign saying "no to nuclear power" on the stage.
In short, if you say "no to nuclear power" you're denying the world of the cleanest, most efficient and longest lasting resource for energy production currently known to science - fusion.
I'll admit we're a few decades from actual fusion generators, but we'll get there eventually and when we do, coal, oil, gas, wind, wave and solar will become virtually pointless.
MagnusBruce 1 year ago
@MagnusBruce I'm not sure how clean the radioactive waste from spent nuclear fuel is. But yeah, everyones entitled to an opinion.
Cheers
wwwuvrxcom 1 year ago 5
@wwwuvrxcom
Nuclear fusion doesn't produce radioactive waste like nuclear fission does.
If my understanding of fusion is correct then the only bi-products of the reaction are helium, heat and (anti)neutrinos (you need not worry about them though - you have trillions of them passing through your body every second)
You may know that we will have a shortage of helium in around 20 years, so that bi-product is actually useful!
Nuclear Fission is a little less environmentally friendly though.
MagnusBruce 1 year ago 2
@wwwuvrxcom and therein lies the beauty of fusion (NOT THE SAME AS FISSION), only a very very small amount of nuclear fuel is needed to produce vast amounts of energy. Furthermore the waste from fission lasts 500 years before it loses it's 'radioactiveness', whereas the waste from fusion lasts only 100 years which is far easier to use on an industrial scale (big as it sounds). Plus, carbon emissions = ZERO.
0308cl 2 days ago
@MagnusBruce unfortunately you have no understanding of the Jack Johnson lifestyle
criticismD93 5 months ago
@criticismD93 I don't appreciate it when people try to deny that nuclear is the way forward. Though I would change my views slightly by adding that other 'green' methods should be just part of our energy generation.
MagnusBruce 5 months ago
Comment removed
hkhammer1486 1 year ago
greatest...quality...ever....
Krnmustang11 1 year ago 7