Please post again to clarify the persistent misconceptions surrounding WC's chain punch... a commenter below once again referred to a flurry of punches as 'chain.'
Wing Chun is very very hard 2 learn plus you need quick wits and fast reaction times, this is why if see alot of videos of wing chun practitioners fighting a taekwondo artist, a BJJ artist etc the wing chun practitioner always lose either they have a slow reaction time, they hav bad wits or they just fail usin wing chun. If you had quick wits and a fast reaction time and you were taught by a true wing chun master you'll be able 2 take on almost any martial artists
Wing Chun is very very hard 2 learn plus you need quick wits and fast reaction times, this is why if see alot of videos of wing chun practitioners fighting a taekwondo artist, a BJJ artist etc the wing chun practitioner always lose either they have a slow reaction time, they hav bad wits or they just fail usin wing chun. If you had quick wits and a fast reaction time and you were taught by a true wing chun master you'll be able 2 take on almost any martial arts
XD well tht was funny laffer saying wing chun cant deal with a tackle?? just move out the way or manipulate the head. i could see the use of grabbing the persons neck/head and kneeing him on the head. tackles are stupid to use in a fight and only work if the other guy is stupid. grapplin on the other hand is a different topic and does not consist of tackling, more manipulation of center of gravity. lol havent studied martial arts but wing chun is somethin i wanna learn
@fushishinobi but can a wing chun practitioner defend himself from a very close up 2 arm grab tackle? now im not sayin BJJ is better than Wing Chun in fact im doin wing chun myself, my cousin is a grandmaster and he says, once you've mastered wing chun use some of its techniques to deal with multiple fighting styles, so observe other fighting styles, think of wat wing chun techniques 2 use 2 counter em dat is practicing smart
@guns1312 haha thts a point but hey if u fight u gotta be smart. cant b throwin random punches. all im sayin is tht it really depends on the person and not everythin is cut and dry. stuff happens in a fight. some things work and somethings mess u up.
Great knowledge and doesn't bash on anyone else. Ving tsun takes a long time to even get good at. Because you training your body to pretty much do everything its been trained not to do through modern techniques. One of the biggest changes I noticed is that all your weight is centered in your heels instead of your balls. So of course it feels rigid at first. It takes a long time because you must develop your sensitivity first. How can you feel your opponent if your always tense.
After reading all of laffer's comments I know he can't be older than 12 years old and obviously hasn't studied any martial arts. Why? because he is far too ignorant to have mastered any.
He speaks as if he is some legendary martial arts god who knows everything about every martial arts known in the world. I think this is because he is too weak to have practiced any of them and thus thinks that if he makes stuff up he will be considered a master.
you can really digg in somebody's shit with wing chun. even though alot of martial arts deserve skeptisim, wing chun is not ont of them. its striaght to the point "beat yo ass" practical.
guys. every martial art has its strengths and its weakness. some people believe if u train for strength u cant train for power, thats b.s. all arts have theyre strength, so learn many arts and u will have many strengths
these are all good combo's shown but come on...how does one that knows Wing Chun "predict" an opponent's next move? ...they can't be sure if the opponent might fall back, hit with his/her leg or hand...
Or is there a way they can predict the opponents next move? such as by reading body language?
@cradleofjohannes Remember Wing Chun is a close combat art so you will have some kind of contact with the person and as a winchun practitioner thats where you want to be, the way we "predict" an opponent's next move as you say is by way of sensitivity, thats why we practice Chi Sau and Chi gerk inorder to increase sensitivity in both our hands and feet so in a fight when your in contact with a combatant your can feel what direction he or she is going to go. Easier said than done thought.
@hgamer I beg your pardon? It is you who have revealed your lack of knowledge, beginning with your comment about speed and muscle being the foundation of other arts. Also, what is the basis for your comments? I simply have developed a big picture on martial arts after years of study. I have studied arts, such as Kempo karate, judo, BJJ (yes, I know there's no such thing, but you know what I mean), and TKD. I'm a brown belt in Kempo, and a green in BJJ and Judo, all internationally graded.
@hgamer One doesn't need to in order to see the incompleteness of Wing Chun. It's unfortunate that Wing Chun practioners are so proud that they can't see it for themselves. The problem with Wing Chun is that there are too many assumptions made of the opponent. Wing Chun practitioners cannot even defend a basic tackle adequately. They'll assume that ground fighting isn't something that needs to be focused on, despite the fact that 95% of fights end up on the ground.
@hgamer That's just classic. Trying to undermine the argument by attacking the credibility of the speaker. I won't sink to your level, hgamer, b/c it's just foolish to argue with idiots - they'll bring you down to their level, then beat you with experience. The fact remains, however, that you can't dispute the argument, b/c you know deep down it's absolutely true. Ultimately, you are not to blame. It's Confucious himself who should be tarred and feathered.
@hgamer It's Confucious thinking, entrenched in arrogance, that results in the creation of exclusivist thinking. Ultimately, what they hold dear, like Wing Chun, is nothing the rest of the world cares for or takes seriously anyway. So why hold it so close to your chest? I promise you no one will claim ownership of such a flawed, incomplete system. The day even one Wing Chun practioner becomes successful in a UFC-type proving ground is the day I shut up. Until then, hgamer, you should.
@hgamer Every art has some kind of inadequacy. Accepting it and learning from other arts to fill that gap (and help to fill theirs as well) is the only way we can become more complete fighters and more importantly, martial artist.
@laffer1988 dude where did u hear that? 95% of fights end on the ground? maybe in the UFC but in case u havnt realised UFC is a competition not real fighting and does have restrictions. if u knew anything about martial arts u would relise that mma is not the best, and there is no best style that goes for hgamer and u both. the effectivness of wing chun and mma has been proven in real street fights. u dnt have any respect for wing chun and u say u did it for 6 months? thats not long enough
@aaronharun 95% of fights, not just UFC fights, end up on the ground. Says who? Says BJJ masters. They could be wrong, but we have to have a little faith in what they say. In UFC, fewer than 95% end up on the ground, b/c UFC fighters are highly skilled, which raises the probability of devastating knockout blows, and b/c they are unclothed. However, most fights end up on the ground b/c it's so easy to grab someone, yet so hard to knock them out, especially when you're wearing clothes.
@laffer1988 and that u have experience in 4 other martial arts? dude ur a brown belt? years of training, that means 2-3 years only. and ur making 2 much assumptions about wing chun. maybe the reason u found boxing 2 be effective is becasue they r completly diff martial arts. boxing is effective and simple, and teaches u to become fighters. wing chun is a more complicated martial art, and involves alot of self defence techniques. alot of sifus would discourage there students to go in UFC
@aaronharun thanks for being far more civilized than hgamer, here. No, I haven't trained for merely 2-3 years. This would be the amount of time needed to earn a brown belt in Kempo only. However, to get a green belt in BJJ means much more than a brown in Kempo. I can take a lifetime to earn a black belt in BJJ. It took me 7 years to earn my green belt in BJJ. The only time you can earn belts easily is when it's commercialized, b/c students want to see progress.
@laffer1988 ok i didnt no that. what ur rank in tkd? but what about wat i sed? do u admit that wing chun is a respectable martial art? and what exactly made u think other wise, just curious. how cum u decided to go with karate instead of muay thai as most bjj student do? sry with the ammount of questions
@aaronharun I hold a red belt in TKD, although I don't value it much b/c it came from an admittedly commercialized school. Wing Chun, and all martial arts in general, are respectable in their own right. They teach discipline and focus, and this helps one to do great things, rather than just say they're going to do it. As for why karate, and not muay thai, karate was what was available to me as a child. Only now do you see muay thai picking up popularity, Before it was relatively unknown.
@aaronharun The reason I don't respect Wing Chun for it's fighting techniques is that they simply aren't effective, especially against skilled fighters. You know there's something wrong when it takes a highly skilled Wing Chun practioner to survive against a relatively unskilled boxer. But match high skill to high skill in each discipline, and you get BBQ Chicken Wing Chun everytime.
@aaronharun To put things into perspective, aaron, a professional fighter might take 15 years to earn a black belt in BJJ. Most people are not pro, so for them it will take even longer. The reason boxing is effective is it's the best thought out system for stand up fighting. You're right, it's not good for self-defence. That's why boxing alone isn't enough. BJJ is excellent for self-defence btw. And even though, many sifus discourage it, Wing Chun practioners have tried UFC, and failed.
@laffer1988 UFC fighters rnt taht skilled to be honest, sum r good. they r all good fighters but there technique in sum aspects need to be worked on. for example the typical UFC guy is good with b juijutsu and boxing as well as the roundhouse kick. there are things missing. where have you seen wing chun experts being beaten up by boxers? i do do boxing and i no its effectiveness, and i no about its philosephy but wing chun puts more focus on it tahts what i ment.
@aaronharun There's no doubt UFC fighters have much to learn. They are not super saiyan wrecking machines. But this is another issue entirely. The point is Wing Chun combative techniques simply aren't effective. Where did I see WC guys getting beaten up? Freestyle fighting competitions (stand up only) all across the states. Same result everytime - BBQ Chicken Wing Chun. I myself have beaten 5 different "experts". How? With a good jab, and good lateral movement.
@laffer1988 were hav u seen wing chun practitioners trying to enter the UFC? in my experience wing chun is an excelent martial art but, the problem with alot of skls nowadays, in many martial arts. is that the masters dnt taeach u how to fight. sure they teach u sum techniques but they dnt prepare u for an actual confrontation if u no what i mean. sum skls just dnt have that roughness that you need to improve as a martial artist.
@laffer1988 bjj and wing chun are proven street combat martial arts, you cant dicredit taht. you have only done it for 6 months and u have a history of martial arts that are very different. maybe u werent doing it rit? maybe ur skll was bad? maybe ur past knowledge of combat conflicted with the veiws of wing chun? one more thing you do alot of martial arts, becareul of that "jack of all trades, master of none"
@aaronharun You're right, aaron. Both BJJ and WC are proven on the street. But only one of them is proven in the ring i.e. against good fighters. I agree 6 months isn't a long time to study, but it is long enough to compare differences. 6 months of boxing enabled me to keep opponents 40 lbs heavier than me at bay, often resulting in eventual stoppage or knockout victories. 6 months of WC taught me a way to defend myself in close combat positions, a position that is very shortlived.
@aaronharun You see, the opportunity to use WC effectively is very limited, because at that range a clinch position is very likely. If you're wearing clothes, it's almost a certainty. And if you're up against somone who's into Muay Thai, you're going to get kneed....a lot.
wing chun also has philosephy and its goal is not simply to make u a good fighter as is the goal of boxing. wing chun ma dnt train to fight in the ring
and now im gona stop talking ive srsly written 2 much.
@aaronharun The reason Wing Chun practioners aren't seen there is that they never manage to qualify. Many have tried, against the wishes of their sifus, but got picked apart by fighters with good boxing skills, especially those with good jabs. Btw, boxing schools have philosophies behind them as well, although this is another point entirely. I respect Wing Chun for its philosophies, sure, but not for its combative techniques. I've been boxing now for 9 years. You should try it, too.
@laffer1988 ok well u have ur ideas i have mine. personaly i dnt have any hands on experience with wing chun, but i still agree that there is no superiour martial art and taht it depends on the person.
@laffer1988 True, 95% of fights END UP on the ground, but you forgot one thing. 95% of fights START OF with wide left and right haymakers. This is where a Wing Chun practitioner can fire off 5 punches before you hit the ground.
@laffer1988 you know why 95% of all fights end up on the ground? because 95% of people in general CAN'T FIGHT. so they get all sloppy and fall to the ground i see it all the time. they dont have balance or control of their bodies because lack of physical activity/not working the core abdominals. flody has never lost his balance to fall in his whole career. where a normal person would fall, he didn't. your not just gonna tackle someone who can defend against it or get out of the way
@laffer1988 well.....maybe some people hae different ways of fighting and if you do end up on the ground theirs a high chance of other people jumping in and stomping your face into the ground witch maybe why most martial arts rely on standing up but again the martial art doesnt make you, YOU make tha martial art.
@hellspawn133 All fights begin standing up. So skill in stand up fighting is very important. But it doenst mean you couldnt end up on the ground. If you think fighting will be like some movie you R wrong. Its one combination or two and then it mostly it turns in clinching. If you dont have your ellbows, headbutt ready and are bad in clinching, grappling you could end up very easy on the ground. Even you have 10 black belts.
@laffer1988 You realise that Yip Man taught people to defend against anything and everything, including tackles or 'takedowns' as you people call it, knives, guns, other instruments such as that? The point of Wing Chun is not to go blow for blow with someone. It's to end the fight as quickly and efficiently as possible without doing any damage to yourself or exert yourself.
@pur3pr0d16y That's great. But let me ask you this: I know of an excellent muay thai fighter who also teaches at the highest level of grappling. Does that mean muay thai encompasses grappling?
What's more is that there is much more to ground fighting than tackles. Can you honestly say WC focuses on ground fighting? The point is WC is incomplete. Its depth in ground fighting is limited. Anyone who's studied the complexities of groundfighting will say the same.
@laffer1988 it is true that wing chun doesnt go over ground per say. but it is also true that almost 90% of martial arts schools in china teach both striking and grappling but when you say incomplete you are not insulting the system because if you say your system is complete then i say your system is useless it is never a good thing for a system to be complete because then the system can not grow.and its also true that 90% of fights go to the ground but 90% of people dont know how to fight cont
@laffer1988 cont. if you say took up striking and trained in both striking and grappling then to truely be complete you would not favor grappling which is what they do in mma because mma isnt truely mixed martial arts it is glorified wrestling thats all. if me and you went out and began to fight and you were a wrestler and i was just a striker if i was 20 times faster then you there is no way in hell your grappling would work cont
@laffer1988 cont that is the problem with the ufc is you see mostly wrestlers and practioners of jui jitsu and judo who take up basic striking and thats it. the majority of mma fighters are like only purple belts just ask yourself how are you supposed to defend against a strikers attacks if he can strike say 10 strikes in a second. the answer is you cant. if person trained in wing chun chain punches only and then sparred all the time and through in a little grappling he would be hard to beat
@houseofaction Yes, he's very slow in the video but it's a -demonstration-. The speed that he shows how to do it is a practise speed, and otherwise correct. I realise you've seen all the other demonstrations of Wing Chun of people throwing '100,000,000 punches in ten seconds'. But that doesn't require skill. All that would be is muscle memory, reflex memory.
@pur3pr0d16y yes i know its muscle memmory and reflex but if practiced properly you will be skilled in your chain punches but the point of chain punches is to develope speed in an actual fight all it would take is a quick flurry of strikes. people dont realize how powerful a wing chun short punch actually is i have seen experienced boxers get knocked out by one wing chun punch and then doing multiple ones cause the power to be compounded apon eachother so 4 wc punches are very powerful cont
@pur3pr0d16y cont i have seen experts throw 3 and 4 chain punches and easily break through 4 to 5 inches of hard wood. but the problem is that wc fighters usually dont spar but if you do sparr using wing chun eventually you will be just as good as a boxer is in boxing and that is a fact just as any system is effective in the right hands
@pur3pr0d16y cont another thing is most people assume they are weak because they look weak but physics state that the more reps you get the more powerful your strikes will be ie if i practice my left jab to 10 million reps my jab will be more powerful then someone who has only practiced there strikes to roughly a couple hundred thousand reps
@laffer1988 alright man, if you are so wise and have all these years in different arts, why are you so ignorant? i was with you up until you said WC is incomplete. true fighters can take the principles of their art and MAKE it complete for them. now you are generalizing the students of WC and any other art. ignorance is bliss....
@laffer1988 that is not true, wing chun work on reflex, the forms are made to understand the basical physic applications that every biologist on earth will tell you that is very simple and know to every human, the problem : i want to punch, i want every body to see, before i even know what i do....
@laffer1988 lol....your lack of knowledge is just spilling over, 95% fights end on the ground... so what does that tell me 95% of the people don't know how to fight
@hgamer I do not profess in wing chun at all. I studied it for 6 months and then discovered that boxing is a far more effective art. Also, I've just seen way too many wing chun "experts" getting beaten by even mediocre boxers. I also found the wing chun stance very cramped and limiting. In the end, arts that are open to revision and worldwide scrutiny always end up the most well designed. Wing Chun just never had what it needed to evolve.
@laffer1988 Laffer after reading your comments. I have deduced that you are indeed a retard. You see no Chinese person who is a practitioner of so many martial arts would be so ignorant as to put down another style. I doubt you've even trained in 1 martial art.
Would you like to know why Wing Chun didn't show any ground techniques in this video? This is because Wing Chun doesn't need them. The person who ends up on the ground is you. That being said there are ground techniques.
@laffer1988 oh just ur birth place or ur family history, they dont make u cinese, u r only a pathetic bug using our language and ashaming our culture, nevertheless, im not gonna keep on that topic here cuz i can go on for days. i c u r thirsty for real fight, y dont u bring ur ass over to get kicked. of course if u think of yourself as a coward (which i bet) bring ur so called skilled fighter, and lets count how many teeth he's got. u want blood, ill make u choke on ur own.
@TheDiseaseDevil Oh no! I'm shaking! You speak like you've got a really small dick. You ought to learn to grow some balls first before you challenge anyone to a fight, because otherwise that mouth will land you a fist full of trouble.
As for skilled fighters, why bring skilled fighters when they show up at my gym each and every day? Everytime some WC practitioner comes in for sparring and actually attempts to use WC, he gets owned by even mediocre boxers.
@TheDiseaseDevil Back to the point. WC lacks worldwide scrutiny. That's why its usage is so limited in MMA. There's only a very small window during which it can be used effectively, and even then it's arguable whether it's better than just plain ol' American boxing.
MMA is the ultimate proving ground where fighters use what works. Haven't you ever wondered why it hasn't caught on? WC practitioners have tried to qualify for UFC in the past, but didn't even make it past the qualifiers.
Look at jiu-jitsu. The Brazilians changed the face of jiu-jitsu into a science that looks very different from its origins. That's because there was too much flowery stuff that never worked. When all of the mighty morphin power ranger crap was removed, you're left with what you see today in places like UFC - only the stuff that works. The harsh reality is that fighting is becoming less beautiful, not more, so I suggest people to beware of beautiful arts, unless you're preparing for a pageant.
Also for the record, wing chun practioners were never succesful at fighting competitions like UFC. They tried to qualify, but failed miserably, as other art forms kept them at bay. Ultimately, the reason why many Asian martial arts do not succeed in a real combat situation is that they were never scrutinized to the extent that arts like boxing and wrestling were. Asian arts were mostly shrouded in mysteriousness and mystical powers they never had. Western arts, however, were open to revision.
That's a pretty biased video description for wing chun. For the record, other martial arts do not rely on speed or muscle to succeed. All martial arts are rooted in efficiency, except for perhaps arts like wushu, which is little more than a dance. Western boxing, for example, is all about the science of economy of motion. It does not rely on speed or muscle, although both help. Wing chun is no different - It's just a different way. The only difference is, boxing is proven in the ring.
I like how A fong does chi sao there is no good video clip on youtube but I have it. I just cannot believe that you said that something in second part of Sil lim Tao is unique only to his system !?! That's total bullshit
AHAAAAA sorry I was a double punch this is unique I never noticed before sorry. Anyway the same idea is at the end of shil lim tao, at least I learned it like 1 + almost double punch which creates more speed or can be used as a block counter punch
ok sorry my mistake smart ass but why not break a board with the punch to show the "expolding power of wing chang" its more convincing that way. hitting a phone book and tearing a phone book is 2 different things. tearing is difficult, hitting the book and the guy holding it moves back is easy due to the fact that he is standing square to you, if he has his legs one front and one back,and leans forward, he won't budge an inch.
maybe you didn't see it but all the power he puts into the punch is just with a hitting range from 1 inch. this is calle the one inch punch and there is so much power behind it you will need to step behind. the most people think wing chun doesn't have a lot power but the 1 inch punch is one of the tricks from wing chun.
@OverFjell Correct. Sifu Fong is also entirely self taught. The double punch is really not a good technique. It just opens you up to a trap and free hit at the expense of a poorly structured low strike.
Hello please check universetechnique, universetechnique2, greatsorcerer, greatsorcerer2, thaijellybean242. Thank you. Enjoy learn something new. View all my favorite. Thank me later. Be a part of what I know.Welcome to my life. You have been selected to view the opening movie trailer of the movie Touch of Fluid.Remember I was here today and time era. Thai
I'm sorry to tell ya but your "sifu" got no idea about leg and foot-work
if u want to create an image video about wing tsun
just take material of good teachers
and you tell in your info that strength doesn't matter....I'm so sorry for you:
I prefered Wing tsung because it's the real deal plus, the sifu tells ya the truth for example about fairness and stuff...and strength is important! not at first but you have to do the strikes, hits and turns without any energy ur enemy will laugh about you!!
Hay Brucey poo in in Nippon karate-do we dont stand in front of each other and get slap happy and when we get that close we will be playing judo with no room to punch OSS
That's a tu quoque fallacy. What gregorstuhbein has or has not done doesn't invalidate the fact that the music choice for this video was... uninspired.
he must be gay or wannabe bruce lee
Youmend 1 week ago
that was very good i liked it alot thumbs up always
1straycat99 2 weeks ago in playlist Wing Chun Techs
@ilikebigguns i agree
hgamer 2 months ago
01:19 do I have to say ''huahhh''?
manhthieugia95 5 months ago 3
@manhthieugia95 lol
hgamer 5 months ago
i saw so many masters of wing chun to kick but i saw sooo many mma figther ti kick but but i never saw a wc master kick an mma figther's ass
onimas1 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@onimas1
and i never saw an mma fighter kick a wc masters ass...
Funky1156 3 weeks ago
appreciated your passion in enlightening people on wing chun's philosophy... keep it up man...
joexxv 9 months ago
"...everybody have fun tonight...everybody wing chun tonight"
TheCHEVYNATOR 9 months ago
@TheCHEVYNATOR awesome your #12 person to say that in the 5 years since this video was posted..... welcome to unoriginality
hgamer 9 months ago
@hgamer I guess Im not the only one to have that corny thought.LOL
TheCHEVYNATOR 9 months ago
@TheCHEVYNATOR i've got a wang chun remark in every wing chun video i've ever done
hgamer 9 months ago
@hgamer I guess thats annoying.The Art is very interesting though.I take Muay Thai and BJJ.
TheCHEVYNATOR 9 months ago
@TheCHEVYNATOR cool... train hard
hgamer 9 months ago
Please post again to clarify the persistent misconceptions surrounding WC's chain punch... a commenter below once again referred to a flurry of punches as 'chain.'
DizzyDerwish 9 months ago
@DizzyDerwish watch?v=jJRLK_4zy10
hgamer 9 months ago
Worth it just to see those 10 seconds of slow -mo chi sau.
TeamLibertyExpress 9 months ago
good demostration,wrong music:(
shua559 10 months ago
@shua559 they had no justin beiber at the time
hgamer 10 months ago 4
Wing Chun is very very hard 2 learn plus you need quick wits and fast reaction times, this is why if see alot of videos of wing chun practitioners fighting a taekwondo artist, a BJJ artist etc the wing chun practitioner always lose either they have a slow reaction time, they hav bad wits or they just fail usin wing chun. If you had quick wits and a fast reaction time and you were taught by a true wing chun master you'll be able 2 take on almost any martial artists
guns1312 1 year ago
Wing Chun is very very hard 2 learn plus you need quick wits and fast reaction times, this is why if see alot of videos of wing chun practitioners fighting a taekwondo artist, a BJJ artist etc the wing chun practitioner always lose either they have a slow reaction time, they hav bad wits or they just fail usin wing chun. If you had quick wits and a fast reaction time and you were taught by a true wing chun master you'll be able 2 take on almost any martial arts
guns1312 1 year ago
XD well tht was funny laffer saying wing chun cant deal with a tackle?? just move out the way or manipulate the head. i could see the use of grabbing the persons neck/head and kneeing him on the head. tackles are stupid to use in a fight and only work if the other guy is stupid. grapplin on the other hand is a different topic and does not consist of tackling, more manipulation of center of gravity. lol havent studied martial arts but wing chun is somethin i wanna learn
fushishinobi 1 year ago
@fushishinobi but can a wing chun practitioner defend himself from a very close up 2 arm grab tackle? now im not sayin BJJ is better than Wing Chun in fact im doin wing chun myself, my cousin is a grandmaster and he says, once you've mastered wing chun use some of its techniques to deal with multiple fighting styles, so observe other fighting styles, think of wat wing chun techniques 2 use 2 counter em dat is practicing smart
guns1312 1 year ago
@guns1312 haha thts a point but hey if u fight u gotta be smart. cant b throwin random punches. all im sayin is tht it really depends on the person and not everythin is cut and dry. stuff happens in a fight. some things work and somethings mess u up.
fushishinobi 1 year ago
@fushishinobi exactly which is why there is not such thing as the best martial arts, it all depends on the master and especially the student
guns1312 1 year ago
awesome sound effects
hwaaahhhhhhh
alowishusmud 1 year ago
Great knowledge and doesn't bash on anyone else. Ving tsun takes a long time to even get good at. Because you training your body to pretty much do everything its been trained not to do through modern techniques. One of the biggest changes I noticed is that all your weight is centered in your heels instead of your balls. So of course it feels rigid at first. It takes a long time because you must develop your sensitivity first. How can you feel your opponent if your always tense.
kikme420 1 year ago
After reading all of laffer's comments I know he can't be older than 12 years old and obviously hasn't studied any martial arts. Why? because he is far too ignorant to have mastered any.
He speaks as if he is some legendary martial arts god who knows everything about every martial arts known in the world. I think this is because he is too weak to have practiced any of them and thus thinks that if he makes stuff up he will be considered a master.
Seriously child try harder.
abcmatron 1 year ago
LOL at laffer and his Hajime no ippo wunna be self. Seriously dude I doubt you've ever taken a martial art.
abcmatron 1 year ago
that's true fastest, biggest, with best stamina is not best fighter but that's very important things.
I'm fan of wing chun still
Pett1024 1 year ago
LOLAWESOME
bigfatnerdd 1 year ago
wow i never new you upload this video it is great. i wish you could just incorporate more of the kicks in your demonstration
goldenking2287 1 year ago
you can really digg in somebody's shit with wing chun. even though alot of martial arts deserve skeptisim, wing chun is not ont of them. its striaght to the point "beat yo ass" practical.
FLpolo 1 year ago
guys. every martial art has its strengths and its weakness. some people believe if u train for strength u cant train for power, thats b.s. all arts have theyre strength, so learn many arts and u will have many strengths
KazanMILLER1 1 year ago
awesome video description
i hope its ok when i copy it and give credits to you
BiFi47 1 year ago
these are all good combo's shown but come on...how does one that knows Wing Chun "predict" an opponent's next move? ...they can't be sure if the opponent might fall back, hit with his/her leg or hand...
Or is there a way they can predict the opponents next move? such as by reading body language?
cradleofjohannes 1 year ago
@cradleofjohannes Remember Wing Chun is a close combat art so you will have some kind of contact with the person and as a winchun practitioner thats where you want to be, the way we "predict" an opponent's next move as you say is by way of sensitivity, thats why we practice Chi Sau and Chi gerk inorder to increase sensitivity in both our hands and feet so in a fight when your in contact with a combatant your can feel what direction he or she is going to go. Easier said than done thought.
ottalese 1 year ago
@cradleofjohannes
ottalese 1 year ago
Oh, and one more thing. I'm Chinese so, please, don't insinuate that my opinions stem from racism.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 Your comments stem from a lack of knowledge
hgamer 1 year ago
@hgamer I beg your pardon? It is you who have revealed your lack of knowledge, beginning with your comment about speed and muscle being the foundation of other arts. Also, what is the basis for your comments? I simply have developed a big picture on martial arts after years of study. I have studied arts, such as Kempo karate, judo, BJJ (yes, I know there's no such thing, but you know what I mean), and TKD. I'm a brown belt in Kempo, and a green in BJJ and Judo, all internationally graded.
laffer1988 1 year ago 2
@laffer1988 Yawn....come back later when you've traiNed more
hgamer 1 year ago
@hgamer One doesn't need to in order to see the incompleteness of Wing Chun. It's unfortunate that Wing Chun practioners are so proud that they can't see it for themselves. The problem with Wing Chun is that there are too many assumptions made of the opponent. Wing Chun practitioners cannot even defend a basic tackle adequately. They'll assume that ground fighting isn't something that needs to be focused on, despite the fact that 95% of fights end up on the ground.
laffer1988 1 year ago 3
@laffer1988 keep talking, just make yourself look even more foolish
hgamer 1 year ago
@hgamer That's just classic. Trying to undermine the argument by attacking the credibility of the speaker. I won't sink to your level, hgamer, b/c it's just foolish to argue with idiots - they'll bring you down to their level, then beat you with experience. The fact remains, however, that you can't dispute the argument, b/c you know deep down it's absolutely true. Ultimately, you are not to blame. It's Confucious himself who should be tarred and feathered.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@hgamer It's Confucious thinking, entrenched in arrogance, that results in the creation of exclusivist thinking. Ultimately, what they hold dear, like Wing Chun, is nothing the rest of the world cares for or takes seriously anyway. So why hold it so close to your chest? I promise you no one will claim ownership of such a flawed, incomplete system. The day even one Wing Chun practioner becomes successful in a UFC-type proving ground is the day I shut up. Until then, hgamer, you should.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@hgamer Every art has some kind of inadequacy. Accepting it and learning from other arts to fill that gap (and help to fill theirs as well) is the only way we can become more complete fighters and more importantly, martial artist.
Ronnock 1 year ago
Yes amen!
superpayaseria 1 year ago
@laffer1988 dude where did u hear that? 95% of fights end on the ground? maybe in the UFC but in case u havnt realised UFC is a competition not real fighting and does have restrictions. if u knew anything about martial arts u would relise that mma is not the best, and there is no best style that goes for hgamer and u both. the effectivness of wing chun and mma has been proven in real street fights. u dnt have any respect for wing chun and u say u did it for 6 months? thats not long enough
aaronharun 1 year ago
@aaronharun 95% of fights, not just UFC fights, end up on the ground. Says who? Says BJJ masters. They could be wrong, but we have to have a little faith in what they say. In UFC, fewer than 95% end up on the ground, b/c UFC fighters are highly skilled, which raises the probability of devastating knockout blows, and b/c they are unclothed. However, most fights end up on the ground b/c it's so easy to grab someone, yet so hard to knock them out, especially when you're wearing clothes.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 and that u have experience in 4 other martial arts? dude ur a brown belt? years of training, that means 2-3 years only. and ur making 2 much assumptions about wing chun. maybe the reason u found boxing 2 be effective is becasue they r completly diff martial arts. boxing is effective and simple, and teaches u to become fighters. wing chun is a more complicated martial art, and involves alot of self defence techniques. alot of sifus would discourage there students to go in UFC
aaronharun 1 year ago
@aaronharun thanks for being far more civilized than hgamer, here. No, I haven't trained for merely 2-3 years. This would be the amount of time needed to earn a brown belt in Kempo only. However, to get a green belt in BJJ means much more than a brown in Kempo. I can take a lifetime to earn a black belt in BJJ. It took me 7 years to earn my green belt in BJJ. The only time you can earn belts easily is when it's commercialized, b/c students want to see progress.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 ok i didnt no that. what ur rank in tkd? but what about wat i sed? do u admit that wing chun is a respectable martial art? and what exactly made u think other wise, just curious. how cum u decided to go with karate instead of muay thai as most bjj student do? sry with the ammount of questions
aaronharun 1 year ago
@aaronharun I hold a red belt in TKD, although I don't value it much b/c it came from an admittedly commercialized school. Wing Chun, and all martial arts in general, are respectable in their own right. They teach discipline and focus, and this helps one to do great things, rather than just say they're going to do it. As for why karate, and not muay thai, karate was what was available to me as a child. Only now do you see muay thai picking up popularity, Before it was relatively unknown.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@aaronharun The reason I don't respect Wing Chun for it's fighting techniques is that they simply aren't effective, especially against skilled fighters. You know there's something wrong when it takes a highly skilled Wing Chun practioner to survive against a relatively unskilled boxer. But match high skill to high skill in each discipline, and you get BBQ Chicken Wing Chun everytime.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@aaronharun To put things into perspective, aaron, a professional fighter might take 15 years to earn a black belt in BJJ. Most people are not pro, so for them it will take even longer. The reason boxing is effective is it's the best thought out system for stand up fighting. You're right, it's not good for self-defence. That's why boxing alone isn't enough. BJJ is excellent for self-defence btw. And even though, many sifus discourage it, Wing Chun practioners have tried UFC, and failed.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 UFC fighters rnt taht skilled to be honest, sum r good. they r all good fighters but there technique in sum aspects need to be worked on. for example the typical UFC guy is good with b juijutsu and boxing as well as the roundhouse kick. there are things missing. where have you seen wing chun experts being beaten up by boxers? i do do boxing and i no its effectiveness, and i no about its philosephy but wing chun puts more focus on it tahts what i ment.
aaronharun 1 year ago
@aaronharun There's no doubt UFC fighters have much to learn. They are not super saiyan wrecking machines. But this is another issue entirely. The point is Wing Chun combative techniques simply aren't effective. Where did I see WC guys getting beaten up? Freestyle fighting competitions (stand up only) all across the states. Same result everytime - BBQ Chicken Wing Chun. I myself have beaten 5 different "experts". How? With a good jab, and good lateral movement.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 were hav u seen wing chun practitioners trying to enter the UFC? in my experience wing chun is an excelent martial art but, the problem with alot of skls nowadays, in many martial arts. is that the masters dnt taeach u how to fight. sure they teach u sum techniques but they dnt prepare u for an actual confrontation if u no what i mean. sum skls just dnt have that roughness that you need to improve as a martial artist.
aaronharun 1 year ago
@laffer1988 bjj and wing chun are proven street combat martial arts, you cant dicredit taht. you have only done it for 6 months and u have a history of martial arts that are very different. maybe u werent doing it rit? maybe ur skll was bad? maybe ur past knowledge of combat conflicted with the veiws of wing chun? one more thing you do alot of martial arts, becareul of that "jack of all trades, master of none"
aaronharun 1 year ago
@aaronharun You're right, aaron. Both BJJ and WC are proven on the street. But only one of them is proven in the ring i.e. against good fighters. I agree 6 months isn't a long time to study, but it is long enough to compare differences. 6 months of boxing enabled me to keep opponents 40 lbs heavier than me at bay, often resulting in eventual stoppage or knockout victories. 6 months of WC taught me a way to defend myself in close combat positions, a position that is very shortlived.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 wing chun is for combat not for sport.
wing chun is hard to learn and doesn;t become practical until after a few years of hard training.
sthtrry123 1 year ago
@aaronharun You see, the opportunity to use WC effectively is very limited, because at that range a clinch position is very likely. If you're wearing clothes, it's almost a certainty. And if you're up against somone who's into Muay Thai, you're going to get kneed....a lot.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 lets talk more on messages lol the damn word limit
aaronharun 1 year ago
@aaronharun I agree.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 and thats why u dnt see them there.
wing chun also has philosephy and its goal is not simply to make u a good fighter as is the goal of boxing. wing chun ma dnt train to fight in the ring
and now im gona stop talking ive srsly written 2 much.
aaronharun 1 year ago
@aaronharun The reason Wing Chun practioners aren't seen there is that they never manage to qualify. Many have tried, against the wishes of their sifus, but got picked apart by fighters with good boxing skills, especially those with good jabs. Btw, boxing schools have philosophies behind them as well, although this is another point entirely. I respect Wing Chun for its philosophies, sure, but not for its combative techniques. I've been boxing now for 9 years. You should try it, too.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 ok well u have ur ideas i have mine. personaly i dnt have any hands on experience with wing chun, but i still agree that there is no superiour martial art and taht it depends on the person.
aaronharun 1 year ago
@laffer1988 True, 95% of fights END UP on the ground, but you forgot one thing. 95% of fights START OF with wide left and right haymakers. This is where a Wing Chun practitioner can fire off 5 punches before you hit the ground.
mamba109 1 year ago
@laffer1988 you know why 95% of all fights end up on the ground? because 95% of people in general CAN'T FIGHT. so they get all sloppy and fall to the ground i see it all the time. they dont have balance or control of their bodies because lack of physical activity/not working the core abdominals. flody has never lost his balance to fall in his whole career. where a normal person would fall, he didn't. your not just gonna tackle someone who can defend against it or get out of the way
FLpolo 1 year ago
@laffer1988 well.....maybe some people hae different ways of fighting and if you do end up on the ground theirs a high chance of other people jumping in and stomping your face into the ground witch maybe why most martial arts rely on standing up but again the martial art doesnt make you, YOU make tha martial art.
hellspawn133 1 year ago
@hellspawn133 All fights begin standing up. So skill in stand up fighting is very important. But it doenst mean you couldnt end up on the ground. If you think fighting will be like some movie you R wrong. Its one combination or two and then it mostly it turns in clinching. If you dont have your ellbows, headbutt ready and are bad in clinching, grappling you could end up very easy on the ground. Even you have 10 black belts.
minasz 1 year ago
You have know idea how correct you are Master. In other words yes you do know exactly. Very good job!
superpayaseria 1 year ago
@laffer1988 why do you say wing chun cant deal with a basic tackle? I only ask since its something we cover quite regularly when training.
Gunslinger800 1 year ago
@laffer1988 You realise that Yip Man taught people to defend against anything and everything, including tackles or 'takedowns' as you people call it, knives, guns, other instruments such as that? The point of Wing Chun is not to go blow for blow with someone. It's to end the fight as quickly and efficiently as possible without doing any damage to yourself or exert yourself.
pur3pr0d16y 1 year ago 5
@pur3pr0d16y Then why doesn't this video show it?
TheTerrorUforgot 1 year ago
@pur3pr0d16y That's great. But let me ask you this: I know of an excellent muay thai fighter who also teaches at the highest level of grappling. Does that mean muay thai encompasses grappling?
What's more is that there is much more to ground fighting than tackles. Can you honestly say WC focuses on ground fighting? The point is WC is incomplete. Its depth in ground fighting is limited. Anyone who's studied the complexities of groundfighting will say the same.
laffer1988 10 months ago
@laffer1988 it is true that wing chun doesnt go over ground per say. but it is also true that almost 90% of martial arts schools in china teach both striking and grappling but when you say incomplete you are not insulting the system because if you say your system is complete then i say your system is useless it is never a good thing for a system to be complete because then the system can not grow.and its also true that 90% of fights go to the ground but 90% of people dont know how to fight cont
houseofaction 9 months ago
@laffer1988 cont. if you say took up striking and trained in both striking and grappling then to truely be complete you would not favor grappling which is what they do in mma because mma isnt truely mixed martial arts it is glorified wrestling thats all. if me and you went out and began to fight and you were a wrestler and i was just a striker if i was 20 times faster then you there is no way in hell your grappling would work cont
houseofaction 9 months ago
@laffer1988 cont that is the problem with the ufc is you see mostly wrestlers and practioners of jui jitsu and judo who take up basic striking and thats it. the majority of mma fighters are like only purple belts just ask yourself how are you supposed to defend against a strikers attacks if he can strike say 10 strikes in a second. the answer is you cant. if person trained in wing chun chain punches only and then sparred all the time and through in a little grappling he would be hard to beat
houseofaction 9 months ago
@pur3pr0d16y your correct but this guy is slow
houseofaction 9 months ago
@houseofaction Yes, he's very slow in the video but it's a -demonstration-. The speed that he shows how to do it is a practise speed, and otherwise correct. I realise you've seen all the other demonstrations of Wing Chun of people throwing '100,000,000 punches in ten seconds'. But that doesn't require skill. All that would be is muscle memory, reflex memory.
pur3pr0d16y 9 months ago
@pur3pr0d16y yes i know its muscle memmory and reflex but if practiced properly you will be skilled in your chain punches but the point of chain punches is to develope speed in an actual fight all it would take is a quick flurry of strikes. people dont realize how powerful a wing chun short punch actually is i have seen experienced boxers get knocked out by one wing chun punch and then doing multiple ones cause the power to be compounded apon eachother so 4 wc punches are very powerful cont
houseofaction 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@houseofaction
You need to get clear on the concept of chain punches as understood in Augustine Fong's line.
Watch this vid:
?v=jJRLK_4zy10
DizzyDerwish 9 months ago
@pur3pr0d16y cont i have seen experts throw 3 and 4 chain punches and easily break through 4 to 5 inches of hard wood. but the problem is that wc fighters usually dont spar but if you do sparr using wing chun eventually you will be just as good as a boxer is in boxing and that is a fact just as any system is effective in the right hands
houseofaction 9 months ago
@pur3pr0d16y cont another thing is most people assume they are weak because they look weak but physics state that the more reps you get the more powerful your strikes will be ie if i practice my left jab to 10 million reps my jab will be more powerful then someone who has only practiced there strikes to roughly a couple hundred thousand reps
houseofaction 9 months ago
Comment removed
GetDamage 1 year ago
@laffer1988 alright man, if you are so wise and have all these years in different arts, why are you so ignorant? i was with you up until you said WC is incomplete. true fighters can take the principles of their art and MAKE it complete for them. now you are generalizing the students of WC and any other art. ignorance is bliss....
jeetkunedo117 1 year ago
@laffer1988 that is not true, wing chun work on reflex, the forms are made to understand the basical physic applications that every biologist on earth will tell you that is very simple and know to every human, the problem : i want to punch, i want every body to see, before i even know what i do....
WingChunHard 1 year ago
@laffer1988 lol....your lack of knowledge is just spilling over, 95% fights end on the ground... so what does that tell me 95% of the people don't know how to fight
hgamer 10 months ago
@laffer1988 that is only 95% of street fights where 95% of people dont know how to fight
houseofaction 9 months ago
@hgamer I do not profess in wing chun at all. I studied it for 6 months and then discovered that boxing is a far more effective art. Also, I've just seen way too many wing chun "experts" getting beaten by even mediocre boxers. I also found the wing chun stance very cramped and limiting. In the end, arts that are open to revision and worldwide scrutiny always end up the most well designed. Wing Chun just never had what it needed to evolve.
laffer1988 1 year ago
@laffer1988 Laffer after reading your comments. I have deduced that you are indeed a retard. You see no Chinese person who is a practitioner of so many martial arts would be so ignorant as to put down another style. I doubt you've even trained in 1 martial art.
Would you like to know why Wing Chun didn't show any ground techniques in this video? This is because Wing Chun doesn't need them. The person who ends up on the ground is you. That being said there are ground techniques.
Ignorant child.
abcmatron 1 year ago
@laffer1988 oh just ur birth place or ur family history, they dont make u cinese, u r only a pathetic bug using our language and ashaming our culture, nevertheless, im not gonna keep on that topic here cuz i can go on for days. i c u r thirsty for real fight, y dont u bring ur ass over to get kicked. of course if u think of yourself as a coward (which i bet) bring ur so called skilled fighter, and lets count how many teeth he's got. u want blood, ill make u choke on ur own.
TheDiseaseDevil 11 months ago
@TheDiseaseDevil Oh no! I'm shaking! You speak like you've got a really small dick. You ought to learn to grow some balls first before you challenge anyone to a fight, because otherwise that mouth will land you a fist full of trouble.
As for skilled fighters, why bring skilled fighters when they show up at my gym each and every day? Everytime some WC practitioner comes in for sparring and actually attempts to use WC, he gets owned by even mediocre boxers.
laffer1988 10 months ago
@TheDiseaseDevil Back to the point. WC lacks worldwide scrutiny. That's why its usage is so limited in MMA. There's only a very small window during which it can be used effectively, and even then it's arguable whether it's better than just plain ol' American boxing.
MMA is the ultimate proving ground where fighters use what works. Haven't you ever wondered why it hasn't caught on? WC practitioners have tried to qualify for UFC in the past, but didn't even make it past the qualifiers.
laffer1988 10 months ago
@laffer1988 rofl.. sport fighting is the ultimate proving ground......duh, okay
hgamer 10 months ago
Look at jiu-jitsu. The Brazilians changed the face of jiu-jitsu into a science that looks very different from its origins. That's because there was too much flowery stuff that never worked. When all of the mighty morphin power ranger crap was removed, you're left with what you see today in places like UFC - only the stuff that works. The harsh reality is that fighting is becoming less beautiful, not more, so I suggest people to beware of beautiful arts, unless you're preparing for a pageant.
laffer1988 1 year ago
Also for the record, wing chun practioners were never succesful at fighting competitions like UFC. They tried to qualify, but failed miserably, as other art forms kept them at bay. Ultimately, the reason why many Asian martial arts do not succeed in a real combat situation is that they were never scrutinized to the extent that arts like boxing and wrestling were. Asian arts were mostly shrouded in mysteriousness and mystical powers they never had. Western arts, however, were open to revision.
laffer1988 1 year ago
That's a pretty biased video description for wing chun. For the record, other martial arts do not rely on speed or muscle to succeed. All martial arts are rooted in efficiency, except for perhaps arts like wushu, which is little more than a dance. Western boxing, for example, is all about the science of economy of motion. It does not rely on speed or muscle, although both help. Wing chun is no different - It's just a different way. The only difference is, boxing is proven in the ring.
laffer1988 1 year ago
this is a beutiful style of fighting :D
sunwithabun 1 year ago
0:45-0:57 GO POREOTIX LMAO!!!
n03lb34st 1 year ago
i dont know why people are hating. this is actually pretty good
Belphybear 1 year ago
@Belphybear that just tells me things are right, coz people in general are arm chair idiots....
hgamer 1 year ago
that's some of the worst wing chun i've ever seen
thepieisready 1 year ago
@thepieisready cool... that means its still better then your crap
hgamer 1 year ago
i think big man can move pretty good
drakead 1 year ago
funny
captainhiroshi 1 year ago
I like it!
ninbukai 1 year ago
the song is bad ass but thats about it lol
redcerket 1 year ago
I like how A fong does chi sao there is no good video clip on youtube but I have it. I just cannot believe that you said that something in second part of Sil lim Tao is unique only to his system !?! That's total bullshit
oneSeabean 1 year ago
one of best wing chun maters ever is Augustine Fong
oneSeabean 1 year ago
AHAAAAA sorry I was a double punch this is unique I never noticed before sorry. Anyway the same idea is at the end of shil lim tao, at least I learned it like 1 + almost double punch which creates more speed or can be used as a block counter punch
oneSeabean 1 year ago
@oneSeabean show me someone who does
hgamer 1 year ago
who does what? its not a double punch but its a same idea
oneSeabean 1 year ago
@oneSeabean what a dork
hgamer 1 year ago
@oneSeabean dork fucks you in your head ...what a hell is dork im not Englishman I dont understand
oneSeabean 1 year ago
@hgamer try robert chu or hawkin cheung
killeracias 1 year ago
@killeracias thanks but..... no
hgamer 1 year ago
its the worst wing chun i ve ever seen !!!!
caryor 1 year ago
yhhiaaaaaa!!
korralikmees 1 year ago
horrible foot work, keep practicing guys.. peace
olskoolbmxer 1 year ago
@olskoolbmxer yeah, god forbid you actually move with structure ... but your probably one of those 100/0 stance dorks, right
hgamer 1 year ago
clint mansell: Lux Aeterna
deadsea2004 1 year ago
Comment removed
saruhan5353 1 year ago
name the first song?
genmas2er 1 year ago
song name: clint mansell requiem for a dream soundtrack
saruhan5353 1 year ago
LOL! at 1:12 he just stamps his foot to "force" the his partner to let go.
hkwingtsunboy 2 years ago
fuckin stupidest music for the vid
juhmasta 2 years ago
@juhmasta sorry, couldn't find the hannah montana music you like
hgamer 2 years ago
@hgamer lol good one......
0:59 is that a one inch punch?
oo he is very good then
Smokeystyle 1 year ago
lmao check out his BOOTS:( wtf martial artist dnt rock them shits lol lol hahahaha! get tha fuck out of here chubby
MetaphoreWar 2 years ago
boots? you are a dumb ass....maybe you can also spot the tatoo of your face on my ass
hgamer 2 years ago
Okay - sideline here - I've heard that music sooo often, and would like to know what it is. Can someone give me a pointer? Thx!
betlamed 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is fucking stupid
spooki1000 2 years ago
he didnt break the board? 0.57
JesterSkywalker 2 years ago
it was a book.. he just didnt want to hurt the guy
jackprat17 2 years ago
its a phone book dumb ass
hgamer 2 years ago
ok sorry my mistake smart ass but why not break a board with the punch to show the "expolding power of wing chang" its more convincing that way. hitting a phone book and tearing a phone book is 2 different things. tearing is difficult, hitting the book and the guy holding it moves back is easy due to the fact that he is standing square to you, if he has his legs one front and one back,and leans forward, he won't budge an inch.
JesterSkywalker 2 years ago
why don't i just read poetry for 30 minutes... who can't break a damn board....
hgamer 2 years ago
lol
JesterSkywalker 2 years ago
maybe you didn't see it but all the power he puts into the punch is just with a hitting range from 1 inch. this is calle the one inch punch and there is so much power behind it you will need to step behind. the most people think wing chun doesn't have a lot power but the 1 inch punch is one of the tricks from wing chun.
patrickdejong12 2 years ago
he didnt break the phone book? lol im just kidding haha
lalalaleesta 2 years ago
sorry , last thing I don't care who's technique the double punches belong to. you should'nt show that technique does not go with that form.
MrNOTORIOUSCal 2 years ago
There are small differences in the different lineages of Wing Chun, this is Sifu Fong's lineage, and he included the double punch.
OverFjell 2 years ago
@OverFjell Correct. Sifu Fong is also entirely self taught. The double punch is really not a good technique. It just opens you up to a trap and free hit at the expense of a poorly structured low strike.
ozzie1246 2 years ago
@ozzie1246 god you are dumb
hgamer 2 years ago
haha the intelligence of your comments astounds me! Keep practising your bogus, mcdonalds variety wing chun mate.
ozzie1246 2 years ago
@ozzie1246 obviously you don't spend time reading the crap you post
hgamer 2 years ago
also this guy may need to make use of his juts.
MrNOTORIOUSCal 2 years ago
there is no double punch in in su nim tao.
MrNOTORIOUSCal 2 years ago
the last part looked like the ending of the movie "nerds"
jullerbuller 2 years ago
hahaha, never thought about it.. but your right
hgamer 2 years ago
what are they doing in 1:25?
okker010 2 years ago
its called "chi sao" a sensitivity training technique.
mackychloe 2 years ago
In real combat, the taller fighter wouldn't allow him to come over the top. What then? What do we do against someone who disallows the high level?
chordmelodistJ12 2 years ago
i dont even know why you try tell people and subject yourself ridicule.people who do real ving tsun know!! people who dont...DON'T
skullcrush21 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Hello please check universetechnique, universetechnique2, greatsorcerer, greatsorcerer2, thaijellybean242. Thank you. Enjoy learn something new. View all my favorite. Thank me later. Be a part of what I know.Welcome to my life. You have been selected to view the opening movie trailer of the movie Touch of Fluid.Remember I was here today and time era. Thai
universetechnique 2 years ago
bruce was right.
wing chun IS excellent but it has it's faults.
saying that i use a lot of wing chun in my blended styles.
bondsan 2 years ago
fu+++++ bruce lee wannabe shit
Youmend 2 years ago
Im diggin your screams bro hahaa
Cloudkicker100 2 years ago 2
nice video and nice text
Gungfu1978 2 years ago
eh.. i doubt people would say wing chun is b.s. to bruce's face.
SxMayKill 2 years ago
bruce wrote the tao of jeet kun do to point out yhe uselessness of wing chun and othe traditional style asshole
ronin954 2 years ago
no he didnt
Dave4567 2 years ago
every martial arts has a specalty
you gotta take a better look at wing chun to realize where its devastating and where its lacking
AganiNYC 2 years ago
I'm sorry to tell ya but your "sifu" got no idea about leg and foot-work
if u want to create an image video about wing tsun
just take material of good teachers
and you tell in your info that strength doesn't matter....I'm so sorry for you:
I prefered Wing tsung because it's the real deal plus, the sifu tells ya the truth for example about fairness and stuff...and strength is important! not at first but you have to do the strikes, hits and turns without any energy ur enemy will laugh about you!!
Grixi90 2 years ago
You know whats funny about this hgamer guy he studies wing chun but he made a video bad mouthing wing chun. ?????????
evctigers22hb 2 years ago
Ronin954 look up bullshido wing chun sucks this style is lacking
this is like the kia master who fought the MMa guy
San Shou is the a good fight style but not these patty cake players cant fight
zukioi 2 years ago
hahaha mma sucks!
sjunnpremirotjavoar 2 years ago 2
Using the melody from 'Requiem for a Dream':
Showing your total lack of creativity and being a stupid sheep since 2000.
gregorstuhlbein 2 years ago
being just like the many of lame as posters, having nothing relevant to say, and no video to back up anything that he can do... since 2007... GAY
hgamer 2 years ago
Hay Brucey poo in in Nippon karate-do we dont stand in front of each other and get slap happy and when we get that close we will be playing judo with no room to punch OSS
ronin954 2 years ago
That's a tu quoque fallacy. What gregorstuhbein has or has not done doesn't invalidate the fact that the music choice for this video was... uninspired.
BigDaddyBongos 2 years ago
Haha, fact.
Porce1ain 2 years ago