its called thermite for you believers that still think terrorist did this.the only terrorist in the U.S are in office running our country in to the ground
Oh ok, at 1:30 he says that, "This is the massive impact of Tower One onto Tower Seven." See that explains it. I always thought Tower One fell straight down into the blown out basement, but now we learn it actually fell sideways. Industrial Light and Magic will have the footage of that soon, I think.
@kimmokuopio there are a lot of good youtube videos of people who were at the 1993 WTC bombing and 9/11 and talk about how - having witnessed a bomb/explosion - they are sure it was the same thing. plus the tower collapsed, there was rubble everywhere burning plastic/metal/ etc im sure there were a lot of weird smells going on -how many police/FBI have "smelled" a building brought down completely by an explosion?
@Born2Flesh Yes, because the explosives have to be expertly placed for them to bring building down in the nice fashion the World Trade Center buildings were brought down. It really was a beautiful demolition job. Pity people had to die.
I like how the NIST guys says "this is the first time in history we have seen a building come down like this because of fire". Meaning it's never happened before nor will it happen again. What a liar. I hope he burns in hell with the other cover up artists.
We are a society of stupid people..in history there is only 2 ways to bring a building down...a wrecking ball...and implosion...end of story...Look at the wreckage fools...it's not smashed..it's blown to hell!
@JSSTyger Continued. The idea is that as more weight is added (more stories) the more pronounced the collapse (will happen more uniformly). Even so, the one in Saint Petersburg fell away from the side with more damage (go figure). I understood a little of what was said in the video, but my Russian is rusty and they speak really fast.
Actually they would not, and anyone that has studied how force gets distributed along the base of a structure would understand that. The creaking the they mention is an indication of stress on the lower levels taking its toll. Just because the collapse did not happen immediately does not mean it did not take significant damage from the force of the fall of the other towers. Search for a video on liveleak. com for "Building Fire & Collapse in Saint Petersburg" to see a 9 story collapse
I understand the physics of what went on there. The explosions can be explained by many common occurrences, but the collapse was most telling. First consider that most engineers build the foundations and lower level to be weight bearing. If the weight bearing lower levels of a building are compromised then they tend to start to buckle under pressure. After a while, the bottom will give out and can give any number of sound effects, but will tend to fall straight down. This is simple physics.
"I understand the phsyics of what went on there..."
Smoke covering up the south face isn't enough to convince me that there were severe fires. I can get a great deal of smoke going on my grill. And you can't collapse that north face straight down in to itself. The columns on the undamaged face absolutely would have had to have been demolished in some way.
Anyone that watches this video or any other video showing the collapse of WTC-7 should be able to tell that some kind of explosives were used. A few small fires could not have caused the collapse. It took NIST several years to come up with a NEW phenomenon to explain it. "Thermal Expansion." How silly is that. LOL
The window breakage on various floors along the eastern and western perimeter core columns before collapse is also interesting. I don't find any explanation from NIST.
I propose we rename the NIST Leader as SHAM ASUNDER, we tar and feather him and then prosecute him and his minions for their crimes against the truth and humanity. I suggest the same for Killtown and Ozzybinozwald, Michael Hezarkhani and a few other scum.And the entire object in SimonShack's September Clues is to promote "Everything Is Fake, CGI". This is as absurd as Mikey H' bad video: And, if you listen closely through the screams, you will hear a low gutteral voice say "This is death".
I like the part about an elevator car being BLOWN out of its shaft... supposedly from some debris hitting the outside of the building.
Controlled demolitions are very distinctive, too. Every person should know that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed building EVER to "collapse" because of fire... and into a tidy pile no less.
It's pretty awesome you got 20 thumbs up in 2 days here. LOL, I smell some distinctive socks!
@WTCdemolitions This is my ONLY YT channel. Some people have YT friends and real friends too....
If u have proof of controlled demolition on 9/11, JUST call the police, it's that eazy. If u dont call the police your a liar. ~3000 people died on 9/11 and u lie about it, thats pretty evil stuff, HUH.
JUST call the police, you say. That is the conventional manner in which crime is reported, true. Unfortunately, the people I should be calling to report are above the law... and help make the laws.
PS If we set aside all the demolition talk, would you still believe the official account of terrorists, hijackings and suicide missions?
Alexander Bortnikov has a summer lake house ~2 km from my house, (Kuopio gets thousands of Russian tourists every summer and winter, because of our big lakes and clean nature), he says 9/11 was a arab terrorist job, do u think that he lies for cheney and bushy
@KimmoKuopio If we use this silly philosophy then we have to agree that the Pentagon’s damage was caused by EXPLOSIVES as several people at the Pentagon smelled explosives. It makes no sense.
that is very naive & ignorant statement since explosives dont necessarily leave a "signature smell"- what is the criterion of the presence of explosives? go read the national fire safety manual of 2001
anyone who actually knows anythin about steel & just how difficult it is to melt steel knows that it takes MANY MANY hours of super concentrated heat to prep a furnace and then u have to set the steel for MANY MANY hours before it starts to even begin to melt.
An office fire however is an open air random fire which doesn't last stay in an area for more than 30 minutes. Compare days lengths to a few minutes- u are telling me that burning copy paper & ink toners will produce the same amount
of energy as the hot coals & other fuels used in a controlled highly CONCENTRATED furnace environment. And furthermore u are sayin open sourced random fires are highly concentrated sources of heat. Good luck with that. And u are saying that steel does not disperse heat at all. nice- its like rewriting ur own laws of physics & thermal dynamics
in the real world we go by newton's laws of physics & thermal dynamics. Only in a cartoon or computer game could u believe such nonsensical claims as spouted by GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATS!
@KimmoKuopio You complete moron every firefighter called the explosions for what they were, explosions, they used words like bombs, what do you expect, them to say "we smell bombs"? How stupid do you have to be? And most of the cutting of columns was done with nano thermite, which by the way was found unreacted in the WTC dust samples, fools like you who cannot debunk facts so you try to find any reason to explain away facts.
Now you go about the smell of explosives? What a tool.
the BBC are really desperate these days. The ridiculous shit they present as if the internet does not exist and a million people investigating it independently. LOL! :)
Man from NYC who lost friends in the wtc, told me that first responders and others were told to keep quiet or lose their jobs and pensions, whatever happened to freedom of speech. I guess that first responders, workers, men, women, and children in other countries are to be used and disposed of when necessary.
"Sevens Exploding" very VERY loose interpretation of what he said. I cant make it out for the life of me. I'm trying to hear what you're saying but its not happening.
Nice to see how the windows pop out. Looks as if the inner columns near to the west facade were weakened. It seems as if the same columns were attacked on serveral floors. Perhaps the vertical connections between the columns (splice plates and welds) were destroyed here.
But why we don't see a similar damage in the middle of the facade?
Somehow 9-11 troofers know more about what happened at WTC 7 than the FDNY....amazing!!!!
dreadnaught2 1 week ago
who set the fires - the was on the take just like jfk - all lies - one shooter no way -
realfunny7 2 weeks ago
how stupid do NIST think we are. i have no doubt explosives where used. it was with out doubt an inside job..
86artist 5 months ago
Hey morons, turn your hearing aid up so you can hear what everyone else can. Explosions were happening all over the place, ALL DAY! wake up!
topcoatpaver 6 months ago 2
9/11 in 7 words...
No Plane Flew On 9/11 at all!
zumobster 8 months ago
its called thermite for you believers that still think terrorist did this.the only terrorist in the U.S are in office running our country in to the ground
Evillag2103 8 months ago
so fire grew "so hot" it melted metal? Oh....I Better go back to college then..
JBoogeyman 8 months ago
Oh ok, at 1:30 he says that, "This is the massive impact of Tower One onto Tower Seven." See that explains it. I always thought Tower One fell straight down into the blown out basement, but now we learn it actually fell sideways. Industrial Light and Magic will have the footage of that soon, I think.
tobiasaurusrex 8 months ago
I like how you left out the rest of the collapse from this video, its really quiet dramatic.
TheSkepticalIdealist 8 months ago
@kimmokuopio there are a lot of good youtube videos of people who were at the 1993 WTC bombing and 9/11 and talk about how - having witnessed a bomb/explosion - they are sure it was the same thing. plus the tower collapsed, there was rubble everywhere burning plastic/metal/ etc im sure there were a lot of weird smells going on -how many police/FBI have "smelled" a building brought down completely by an explosion?
myopiaa 9 months ago
Theres no chance this building could collapse like a house of cards from a fire only. Controlled demolition makes more sense.
tompatomp 10 months ago
That was a very loud fire at 1:40...
No plane in the Pentagon, no plane in the field either.
Ammyai 10 months ago
The Federal Building in Tulsa, Oklahoma that McVeigh blew up had a massive explosion that rip most of the building away, but it never collapsed.....
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@Born2Flesh Yes, because the explosives have to be expertly placed for them to bring building down in the nice fashion the World Trade Center buildings were brought down. It really was a beautiful demolition job. Pity people had to die.
Ammyai 10 months ago
I like how the NIST guys says "this is the first time in history we have seen a building come down like this because of fire". Meaning it's never happened before nor will it happen again. What a liar. I hope he burns in hell with the other cover up artists.
22kane1 10 months ago
We are a society of stupid people..in history there is only 2 ways to bring a building down...a wrecking ball...and implosion...end of story...Look at the wreckage fools...it's not smashed..it's blown to hell!
beckpod1 10 months ago
@JSSTyger Continued. The idea is that as more weight is added (more stories) the more pronounced the collapse (will happen more uniformly). Even so, the one in Saint Petersburg fell away from the side with more damage (go figure). I understood a little of what was said in the video, but my Russian is rusty and they speak really fast.
Farinhir 1 year ago
@JSSTyger
Actually they would not, and anyone that has studied how force gets distributed along the base of a structure would understand that. The creaking the they mention is an indication of stress on the lower levels taking its toll. Just because the collapse did not happen immediately does not mean it did not take significant damage from the force of the fall of the other towers. Search for a video on liveleak. com for "Building Fire & Collapse in Saint Petersburg" to see a 9 story collapse
Farinhir 1 year ago
I understand the physics of what went on there. The explosions can be explained by many common occurrences, but the collapse was most telling. First consider that most engineers build the foundations and lower level to be weight bearing. If the weight bearing lower levels of a building are compromised then they tend to start to buckle under pressure. After a while, the bottom will give out and can give any number of sound effects, but will tend to fall straight down. This is simple physics.
Farinhir 1 year ago
@Farinhir
"I understand the phsyics of what went on there..."
Smoke covering up the south face isn't enough to convince me that there were severe fires. I can get a great deal of smoke going on my grill. And you can't collapse that north face straight down in to itself. The columns on the undamaged face absolutely would have had to have been demolished in some way.
See the Gldbr video...they were demolished.
veoh. com/ users/ GldBr
JSSTyger 1 year ago
Anyone that watches this video or any other video showing the collapse of WTC-7 should be able to tell that some kind of explosives were used. A few small fires could not have caused the collapse. It took NIST several years to come up with a NEW phenomenon to explain it. "Thermal Expansion." How silly is that. LOL
infoseeker264 1 year ago
1:40 could someone answer me this questions:
Where did this video come from, for instance?
Is the sound of the explosion genuine?
Where was it taken?
When was it taken?
Where is the evidence that this was an "explosion at WTC 7"?
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
1:46
I'm not sure. "Seven's exploding" or "several explosions" (two bangs).
MrKoenig1985 1 year ago
@MrKoenig1985 not all explosives have a strong smell. That was you said is a very ignorant statement.
UnlimitedPTC 9 months ago
"Elevator car blown out of its shaft." Not knocked out of its shaft or shaken out of its shaft. BLOWN out. Look at the building come down. Get real.
WTCdemolitions 1 year ago 9
@WTCdemolitions
The window breakage on various floors along the eastern and western perimeter core columns before collapse is also interesting. I don't find any explanation from NIST.
MrKoenig1985 1 year ago
I propose we rename the NIST Leader as SHAM ASUNDER, we tar and feather him and then prosecute him and his minions for their crimes against the truth and humanity. I suggest the same for Killtown and Ozzybinozwald, Michael Hezarkhani and a few other scum.And the entire object in SimonShack's September Clues is to promote "Everything Is Fake, CGI". This is as absurd as Mikey H' bad video: And, if you listen closely through the screams, you will hear a low gutteral voice say "This is death".
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
Explosions ≠ Explosives
KimmoKuopio 1 year ago
No explosives used because there was no smell of explosives at ground zero
~every firefighter/policeman/FBI knows how explosives smell when ey explode, the smell is VERY distinctive.
KimmoKuopio 1 year ago 13
@KimmoKuopio
I like the part about an elevator car being BLOWN out of its shaft... supposedly from some debris hitting the outside of the building.
Controlled demolitions are very distinctive, too. Every person should know that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed building EVER to "collapse" because of fire... and into a tidy pile no less.
It's pretty awesome you got 20 thumbs up in 2 days here. LOL, I smell some distinctive socks!
WTCdemolitions 1 year ago
@WTCdemolitions This is my ONLY YT channel. Some people have YT friends and real friends too....
If u have proof of controlled demolition on 9/11, JUST call the police, it's that eazy. If u dont call the police your a liar. ~3000 people died on 9/11 and u lie about it, thats pretty evil stuff, HUH.
KimmoKuopio 1 year ago
@KimmoKuopio
JUST call the police, you say. That is the conventional manner in which crime is reported, true. Unfortunately, the people I should be calling to report are above the law... and help make the laws.
PS If we set aside all the demolition talk, would you still believe the official account of terrorists, hijackings and suicide missions?
WTCdemolitions 1 year ago
@WTCdemolitions
I dont believe
I know that mentally ill arabs did 9/11
Alexander Bortnikov has a summer lake house ~2 km from my house, (Kuopio gets thousands of Russian tourists every summer and winter, because of our big lakes and clean nature), he says 9/11 was a arab terrorist job, do u think that he lies for cheney and bushy
KimmoKuopio 1 year ago
@KimmoKuopio If we use this silly philosophy then we have to agree that the Pentagon’s damage was caused by EXPLOSIVES as several people at the Pentagon smelled explosives. It makes no sense.
infoseeker264 1 year ago
@KimmoKuopio
that is very naive & ignorant statement since explosives dont necessarily leave a "signature smell"- what is the criterion of the presence of explosives? go read the national fire safety manual of 2001
swu880 1 year ago
anyone who actually knows anythin about steel & just how difficult it is to melt steel knows that it takes MANY MANY hours of super concentrated heat to prep a furnace and then u have to set the steel for MANY MANY hours before it starts to even begin to melt.
An office fire however is an open air random fire which doesn't last stay in an area for more than 30 minutes. Compare days lengths to a few minutes- u are telling me that burning copy paper & ink toners will produce the same amount
swu880 1 year ago
of energy as the hot coals & other fuels used in a controlled highly CONCENTRATED furnace environment. And furthermore u are sayin open sourced random fires are highly concentrated sources of heat. Good luck with that. And u are saying that steel does not disperse heat at all. nice- its like rewriting ur own laws of physics & thermal dynamics
swu880 1 year ago
in the real world we go by newton's laws of physics & thermal dynamics. Only in a cartoon or computer game could u believe such nonsensical claims as spouted by GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATS!
swu880 1 year ago
@KimmoKuopio You complete moron every firefighter called the explosions for what they were, explosions, they used words like bombs, what do you expect, them to say "we smell bombs"? How stupid do you have to be? And most of the cutting of columns was done with nano thermite, which by the way was found unreacted in the WTC dust samples, fools like you who cannot debunk facts so you try to find any reason to explain away facts.
Now you go about the smell of explosives? What a tool.
Xendrius 10 months ago
@KimmoKuopio so what were the explosion sounds?
roidzsimon 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KimmoKuopio not all explosives have a strong smell. That was you said is a very ignorant statement.
UnlimitedPTC 9 months ago
@KimmoKuopio You are going to base your claim on lack of smell?
unitedairforcepilot 8 months ago
@KimmoKuopio Thermite isn't explosive.
sinastri 7 months ago
There are Thermite Granades, so pull your head from your ass and try again.
Born2Flesh 4 months ago
or "Seven's gonna fall, right now! "
gunthaarz 1 year ago
you can clearly hear him say "Seven's gonna blow right now! "
gunthaarz 1 year ago
the BBC are really desperate these days. The ridiculous shit they present as if the internet does not exist and a million people investigating it independently. LOL! :)
gunthaarz 1 year ago
Diesel Fuel in the building was the bullshit story at the time.That's all u heard on 911 in NYC-TOTAL HORSESHIT.
cadu1995 1 year ago
Man from NYC who lost friends in the wtc, told me that first responders and others were told to keep quiet or lose their jobs and pensions, whatever happened to freedom of speech. I guess that first responders, workers, men, women, and children in other countries are to be used and disposed of when necessary.
badattitude77769 1 year ago
"Sevens Exploding" very VERY loose interpretation of what he said. I cant make it out for the life of me. I'm trying to hear what you're saying but its not happening.
sl3ptsolong 1 year ago
Oh, wow! Good quality.
0:01
Nice to see how the windows pop out. Looks as if the inner columns near to the west facade were weakened. It seems as if the same columns were attacked on serveral floors. Perhaps the vertical connections between the columns (splice plates and welds) were destroyed here.
But why we don't see a similar damage in the middle of the facade?
MrKoenig1985 1 year ago
If ordinary office fires can bring down three tall steel reinforced towers on 9-11 who needs controlled demolition .....just light a match.
Who are they trying to kid.
Buildings do not fall down from office fires.....that is negligence
BUT really we already should know by now it is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
No buildings reinforced with steel have fallen before or after 9-11
suddenly into their own footprint.
Wake up people
vv vv vv dot 911oz dot c om search Building 7 or Thomas Gordon
blavatsky3 1 year ago
No, too obvious
cingle2004jp 2 years ago
Very good!
YougeneDebs 2 years ago