Added: 1 year ago
From: LiberalViewer
Views: 61,137
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (930)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LiberalViewer.. Give me a shout-out bud!

  • Keep making the great videos.

  • onion news is around 48 times more true and unbiased than fox news..

  • I never watch fox, which is why I didnt know they were this bias. It's funny how they yell at you if you disagree with them. Not very professional but they stay on the air anyway. And Orielly is the worst I wonder if he keeps his klan card in his wallet.

  • Too funny. Fox is the ONLY news channel which is biased, right? Don't bother to look in the mirror, haters. Oh, and don't try to complain about a "lack of civility" when y'all can't even be civil. (I am actually ashamed for lowering myself to comment on such a sophomoric page).

  • @sidelineredwine What exactly is your defintion of civil? As far as I can contamplate, most of what Fox news preaches is everything below the true definition of civil.

  • @sidelineredwine

    This is beyond bias. Fox News is frequently willfully dishonest. In the general case, being unbiased is next to impossible, but you could at least try to not lie with a straight face.

  • Ha, I'm a conservative and these videos are my favorite on youtube. Fuck Fox News.

  • When trying to combat fox you just need to remember this Christopher Hitchen's

    quote "that which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without

    evidence"

  • assho;es gawwd

  • Feh, I don't even watch the news anymore. It seems to be about telling people every problem with the world you can imagine and no long term fix... yeah I know some people want to know what's happening around them but why worry about things you can't change? (That's how I feel about it anyway.)

  • Thank you so much for the work you Do,fox news is really very bias,and they don't even try to hide it as well any more,I constantly write it and they never seem to let the public know that there's a different point of view out there,they clearly are one sided and will say or do anything to get a republican in the white house (not happening) last point is ,check out how nice they are to people that on that share their views ,compare to those that don't,they barely get a chance to talk,anyway kee

  • Fox News.....is not

  • All News is tainted, simply because the source is limited to AP or Reuters who are basically the same. Second, all one has to do is look at who owns them and who runs/controls them and then their connection to other groups and even back to the government. Opposition is not decent from mainstream, it is there to allow for one way of thinking or limited thinking because we think that we are free and have choices. We dont as it is all controlled and the government is in on the fix.

  • @Trackstar2211 This is not true. News should be simply reporting facts, which in my country is done multiple times per day on multiple channels for about 30 minutes. Talking about political issues is done on other programmes. That's the way it should be. Newspapers may have articals with some bias, but that is clear from the start, those articles are opinion articles, or 'columns', and not regular news articles.

    It shouldn't be that difficult for America to report real news.

  • We the people need to throw out “all large news media stations” with the exception of local news, actually something that effects our lives! News we can actually deal with and has some connect with us on a local level! People cannot deal with opinions and propaganda based on lies and deceptions of arguments and babblers in mainstream media! It’s way to much confusion of wading through errors and who’s right and who’s wrong!? Not enough hours in a day for people that actually have a life!

  • Days without bias at Fox News: 0

  • Fist, Thank you! Second, the falsehood of FOX News will not be stopped with the truth. the Republican base prefer to be sheep and be told lies. Personally, those who do their due diligence have broken their shackles and reveil the truth of media lies. Where as those who follow blindly refuse and deny the light of truth as will struggle to accept an opposing side.

  • LiberalViewer, thanks for posting the videos exposing the propaganda methods the reporters at the Fox "News" Channel uses to deceive their viewers. I'm hoping they'll be more people like you that will continue to expose the media establishment's numerous attempts at distorting the truth.

  • I find it interesting how the fundie seems to have yet to make any factual defense for Fox and relies on ad hominem, straw man and insists that it's okay for Fox to be biased and lie if it's "good". This is the kind of arguments that parents use to lie about the Tooth Fairy to their kids, or wives use to justify taking abuse from their husbands. You're pathetic.

  • Excellent case made as always.

    I can't really see how Fox News can legitimately defend itself against these accusations, yet they still make feeble half-arsed attempts.

  • American's should vote independantly, while dis-regarding straw or network polls!!

    Voting an official into office based on electibility alone is why states are require recounts more often in these modern times.

    Go Ron Paul!!

  • ALSO, this morning 09/28/2011, I was being propogan-ized by Fox news on clear bias from Gretchen Carlson concerning her opinions that Americans should only vote for a presedential candidate of electibility. This is after, posting their opinionated polls of who fox believes is electible. Otherwords, don't vote for the crazy nut Ron Paul.

    It's absolutely, no-body's business who Americans vote for!!

    Go Ron Paul!!

  • Fox News is not a cancer it's a billionaire funded, irremovable canker. The question is how long, if ever, will it take for Rupert's influence to fade. Be assured it will be with us & future generations for a long time, not because of it's correctness, but because it make money.

    Feed the stupid & ignorant what they're hungry for & they'll buy it, or more exactly sellers will pay to advertise to them. Americans aren't stupid, but boy are many of them badly educated.

  • Fox news has always been biased toward the government.Lot's of idle threats from their guests,and viewers who call in to voice their narrow biased view of the government.Without the government,what you have left?THE CORPORATIONS.

  • Keep up the excellent work @LiberalViewer

  • Where's your MSNBC bias examples? Gosh, then that would be fair. Never mind.

  • @michael19157 Guess you also missed 5:31 ha ha ha ha

  • Where's your MSNBC bias examples? Gosh, then that would be fair. Never mind.

  • @michael19157 Where's YOUR videos on MSNBC bias? Remember, LiberalViewers motto isn't "Fair and balanced." You got a problem with MSNBC, get up off your lazy ass and do something about it. Something tells me though, the reason we don't see videos about MSNBC bias is because MSNBC isn't nearly as bias as Fox news. Fox doesn't even TRY and cover it up. Just don't call someone unfair who isn't claiming to be fair in the first place.....

  • @TacoBurgher327  Larry and Rachel aren't biased???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!! Sounds like you've been smokin too much of that liberal wacky weed!

  • @michael19157 "aren't biased" Umm, i NEVER said they WEREN'T bias, I said why don't YOU make that video? Seems you have your conservative fingers in your ears, AGAIN.....

    Oh and ps, even if i did smoke weed, that wouldn't make my point any less valid. Learn what evidence against an argument is.....

  • Why do I need to make a video when YouTube is choked with MSNBC socialist propaganda clips? FOX News definitely has a bias - towards what is right and good. Evidence - their ratings blow away CNN and MSNBC. Snarling amoral character assassins like Maddow, Schultz, O'Donnel and Matthews just give FOX that much more of an edge.

  • @michael19157 Ratings have nothing to do with whether the information that station puts out is fair or balanced, true or untrue. Ratings actually show how entertaining something is. It's a news case, not an episode of "Friends." Who cares about ratings, it's about information. And childish name calling doesn't hold merit either. I ask you again, learn what evidence against an argument is. And let me add, learn what evidence ISN'T, as well...

  • @michael19157 Gee, shut up pretty quickly there ha ha what's a matter? People to smart for ya?? ha ha ha Pathetic, as usual!

  • @TacoBurgher327 In typical lib fashion, can't argue intelligently, respond as you did. I love your "People to smart" comment. The "to" with one "o" says it all. And you're calling me pathetic?

  • @michael19157 "can't argue intelligently,"

    Kinda like the stat I threw out there that you ignored? ha ha ha Ya, You're WAY too intelligent for me grammar Nazi! Ironically, MY grammatical error didn't hinder THE POINT, but I guess you ignored that as well.

    "And you're calling me pathetic"

    Yes, ignoring the fact that ratings have NOTHING to do with the TRUTH that station puts out is PATHETIC. Ha ha so keep correcting GRAMMATICAL errors, while I demolish your 'logic' bitch.

  • @michael19157 "The "to" with one "o" says it all. "

    It actually says NOTHING, except that i miss typed. But then again, someone who things RATINGS are justification for 'factual' information, isn't the smartest to begin with...

    By you're logic, the last episode of M*A*S*H* was one of the most factual show ever on television as it had one of the highest ratings ever. You're stupid....

  • I think they are playing two sides against the middle!........so are we supposed to spend all our time discerning what is truth and what isnt?......I think that is exactly their point!, to keep you guessing? all the while they perpetrate untold fraud behind the scenes, the real issues are never even discussed!........Media companies are just propoganda tools for one side or another, depending on what view they are propogating any given day!

  • There is a difference between accidentally misinforming the public and clear outright fraud. We no longer prosecute fraud in this country unless it violates some piece of PC legislation. When a news anchor is demonstrated to be intentionally defrauding the public for the purpose of profit from ad sales, hides behind the 1st amendment as "entertainment" and simultaneously tells the general public that the information is both news and also factual? That is fraud and it should be prosecuted.

  • Havig said that - the difference you claim between a public option and complete governmental control are 100% semantic. No normal health insurance system will be able to compete with one that can dip into the citizens pockets electively. To vote for (or advocate) any of these "options" is to advocate for socialized medicine - find a place on the planet where doesn't occur- that's right you can't.

    I lived in Europe and am in medicine here - our system is MUCH better, expensive yes but better

  • You have used Rachel Maddow to show how bias exists ON THE OTHER SIDE?!?!?

    The fact that she honestly lines 6 media sources in one category and 1 in the other tells me that at least she is accurate with regard to the categories - but to say that one tower leans right while the other is upright - is non-sense.

    The mainstream media's portrayal of the TEA party movement - whose hallmark is that they leave their protest scenes cleaner than when they got there is simple character assination

  • All credible nonpartisan studies on the subject have, year after year after year, proven that FNC is the most fair and balanced cable news network. Period. You chumps can't deal with facts.

  • @canofsand Pew Survey: Fox News Audience Much More Balanced

    thehotjoints-dot-com/2008/10/0­6/new-poll-more-democrats-watc­h-fox-news

    MSNBC trusted by paltry 12%. Fox at top with 42%.

    hotair-dot-com/archives/2010/0­9/27/poll-among-cable-news-net­works-msnbc-trusted-by-12

    Study Finds Democrats Given Preferential Treatment by the MSM

    newsbusters-dot-org/blogs/terr­y-trippany/2007/10/30/study-fi­nds-democrats-given-preferenti­al-treatment-msm

    (continues)

  • @canofsand (continued)

    FOX NEWS FAR MORE BALANCED IN COVERAGE OF 2008 ELECTION - REST OF MEDIA VERY ONE-SIDED

    journalism-dot-org/node/13436

    Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist

    newsroom dot ucla dot edu/page dot asp?RelNum=6664

    Gallup: Americans really distrust the media (48% say "too liberal," only 15% say "too conservative")

    hotair-dot-com/archives/2010/0­9/29/gallup-americans-really-d­istrust-the-media/

    (continues)

  • @canofsand (continued)

    REPORTERS GIVE DEMS MONEY OVER REPUBLICANS 9 TO 1

    msnbc-dot-msn-dot-com/id/19113­455

    msnbc-dot-msn-dot-com/id/19113­455

  • @canofsand Now let's watch you spin ALL THAT with some banal contrivance about how eeeeeeevil Fox is cuz you saw PROOF on this one blog one time.

  • @canofsand Your links don't work. Maybe the leftist group "Anonymous" hacked the interwebs and removed the pages.

  • People watch fox news because it's conservative.They go to Fox to get a conservative point of view.

  • does anyone's gaydar in the gay community go off the charts when goosey doocy opens his mouth?

  • I didn't know Garfield was a democrat

  • I think the fox news reporters are specially selected for their stupidity. They are not evil. They just don't understand who they are working for. 

  • Liberal Viewer I want to thank you, although I am always assaulted by right wing ideals, it is glad to know that there are sensible people out there. Keep fighting the good fight.

  • @Big5000K Damn Skippy - LiberalViewer is a true American Hero. The US needs more citizens that care even 10% as much as LiberalViewer.

  • To me fox news is no different in substance than TMZ

  • Did She just say that, "News is only those who are democrats and kissing Obama's ass"?? Fox is the o0nly network with balls

  • A case in point would be how Fox News systemically used "Usama" in lieu of "Osama" like the rest of the news world. Eventhough Fox News anchors used 'Osama" prior to his capture, after Osama's capture Fox News shows from Fox & Friends to Greta's OTR, "Usama" was the only acceptable variation. I don't know if they did it for Google purposes, but there had to be a reason and, of course, a corresponding memo to get everyone on board.

  • Fox news channel's long-running claim of "fair and balanced" news is pathetic to say the least.

  • She was talking about Glenn Beck, which is an opinion show, not a news show. So how could that possibly apply to the entire network? And exactly what political rally was organised by Fox News? The only one I can think of was Beck's, but that was an individual effort not supported by the news channel.

  • @flightsimtim

    An individual effort not supported by the news channel? Of course it was! It was built up by Fox every hour of every day for like a month! And then they covered it LIVE> Think about things in a different way and you will see that none of it is news, It's just Inside edition disguised as news. (Bill O is right at home!) We watch it every day. It's so funny.

  • @flightsimtim Just the fact that a "news" channel has "opinion shows" and has people like you defending it amazes me. A news channel has news, nothing else. Fox news is a propaganda machine for the republican party. Please watch the rest of this gentleman's clips and open your eyes to what fox news is really about.

  • Big fan here LibV keep it up mate.

  • fuck fox and all those idiot

    fuck em all

  • Bullshit Alert! If Fox news bias is considered 'Different', then the rest of the (alleged) News Media bias should be considered 'Flamboyant' ! ! !

  • *In an open marketplace of ideas, will the power of truth eventually overcome the power of FOX news falsehoods?*

    The answer, LiberalViewer, is absolutely YES.

    And take a lot at your subscriber count and video views, now look at the FOX youtube channel. This is an actual by-choice, non-innert interaction with media and entertainment, and people CHOSE to flock to you, not FOXs channel.

    TV is a totally different phenomenon, which doesn't evolve out of pure popularity, but also marketshare.

  • @Neanderthalcouzin - I wish I could agree with you and answer "absolutely yes" but I cannot. The idea that the open market place of ideas assures that the best and most effective ideas and products will rise to the top is just not true. Without proper marketing the best vacuum, toaster, car... you name it- would likely not be able to achieve significant market penetration. And conservatives know how to market very well. Non- conservatives would do well to heed this lesson.

  • @hannibal574 I agree with what you wrote, I think you mistook my use of language of an *open market place of ideas* (just a metaphor), for plugging free-market ideology. I am not a market fundamentalist type at all.

  • Faux news is junk news.

  • @liberalviewer In an open marketplace will the power of the truth overcome the power of Faux news falsehoods? I'm gonna be honest, no, I don't think so, and this is why we need to decrease Faux news's power by spreading the truth and reducing the general power of corporations, restoring that power to it's original intended possessor, the United States citizen. Corporations are not meant to have control and power over our government because of money, that is what the constitution was made for.

  • Fox news talks a lot of bollocks, it will always be revealed but often to late to correct any action taken on behalf of their posturing, their propoganda might rule the day but it will never last the year. In years to come they will be recognised as one of the greatest examples of how money can buy opinion, and how opinion can distort the truth.

  • You liberals who never actually watch fox news but rather let George Soros funded outlets tell you what to think, are known a "useful idiots" to socialists. You are being played by very powerful people. If you watch Fox, you might actually learn why... say, Petrobras gets new drilling contracts to drill in th gulf, when no american company has. You learn George Soros has 900 million dollars invested in Petrobras. MSNBC, CNN, ABC... they don't run that story.

  • hey man good stuff....I know it's said time and time again, BUT I HATE FOX NEWS!!!

  • @BlackRepublican2010

    Dude. FOX NEWS IS LYING TO YOU! They always have! You cannot trust them! Really!!!

    I can seriously guarantee that the reason your a "former" Democrat is because you watch Fox News thinking that it's real news! It's not! It's actually propaganda.

    Watch the documentary "OutFoxed." (Seach for it. It's on YouTube.) You'll see how Fox *really* is! You just might not watch Fox again.

  • As a former Democrat, I have to say no network is perfect but the Fox News Channel is 100% more fair than any other network out there. No network has held the terrible Obama Presidency to the same personal mean spirited attacks it launched against President Bush. Liberals are just mad because one station is conservative & they cannot control it. Democrat is latin for "Control Freak".

  • @BlackRepublican2010

    I think you need to read up on your latin.

    Democracy means rule of the people.

    So democrat would translate into something like peoples rule (demos being people, crat being rule, or somesuch anyway, my own latin wasen't very extensive)

    Also... Even I as a non-US citizen know that fox was not attacking Bush in such a personal mean manor as they are Obama.

  • @BlackRepublican2010

    is this comment really a reaction to THIS video? have you even watched these video's? they're FACTUAL, not liberal. they're bias in subjects, but this doesn't make them irrelevant.

    please, PLEASE, show examples when comparing fox to 'any other news network' and claiming fox comes out the better. I've never seen a network spread lies like fox does.

    also, '100% more fair'? go finish highschool.

  • i hope you get paid for this because you do a good job and really care about the issues. i come from scotland and when i go to america on holiday i watch fox news for a laugh. keep it up and keep the faith

  • What about the bias at MSNBC? Fox's alleged bias pales in comparison to MSNBC. Please don't try and tell me that the left doesn't have talking points. They even have a website titled as such. The left wing talking points memo is the New York times. Explain then why democrats and the main stream media all come out and use the same word like "gravitas"

    Rachel Maddow does all the exact same things you acuse Fox of doing. Is there no one on the left that is hones?

  • i like rachel maddow, but she uses the word 'republicans' a bit too liberally. no pun intended.

  • Every time you reference your own videos multiple times to make a point, it makes you seem as though you're saying you told us so. It also makes you seem like you're slacking in your research if you can't use fresh information to expand the understanding of a situation, instead of keeping the light on a few pieces of information. Just some feedback.

  • Anthony Weiner damn that made me laugh sorry but I have a very mature immature system.

  • But MSNBC is SO balanced, right?

  • @slit555 MSNBC has never said otherwise. check out their slogans "Feel the Power of Change" (Used during Democratic primaries) and "Lean Forward" (possible reference to Progressivism). MSNBC never said they were "Fair and Balanced", also can you answer the second question posed by the video with specific examples?

  • @slit555 Shutup, did he ever say they were?

  • @zeno57 Relevant context is always provided and illuminating. It offers many interviews with highly qualified guests that will make you question the grasp that mainstream "experts" have of their own fields. You will leave with a solid understanding of whats going on, unlike anything you will receive from corporate media.

    democracynow[DOT]org

    Some very good newspapers available in English include:

    Der Spiegel

    Le Monde

    El Pais

    The Guardian

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • So fox news is right bias.ABC,NBC,CBS,CNN are all leftwing bias..Why cant there be just one news network bias for the dying middleclass Americans who have had thier good paying factory jobs sent overseas and to mexico..Lyed to by Clinton and Bush,,,Nafta and CAFTA will be good for you and create jobs. And ALL of these news medias went along...They are all guilty of distroying America.

  • @zeno57 Prepare yourself for a rude awakening if you don't already know that mainstream US media is 99% propaganda.

    Democracy Now! is my favorite. It's the best daily 1hr summary of world and national news. It's hosted by Amy Goodman, who is arguably the journalist who is the most respected among other journalists worldwide. Democracy Now! is widely understood to be the only legitimate source of news in the US.

    The top stories are covered in depth.

  • @ZorkFrobozz Did you read my post? You are stuck in that left,right paradime.Dems vs reps.. Thats what they want. All the middleclass and lower class should unite against our emeny,,,the ruling class..The shrinking middleclass will soon be the lower class also because they shipped our factorys out of the USA.If u dont believe me,,,who voted for the banster bailout ? both parties,,,who was against it ? 95% of Americans.

  • To take it a step further, the müezzins of the Republican Party (Fox, Rush, etc) have vilified the educated left (inexplicably referring to them as elitists) to the point where the right-wing's common element have an abiding hatred of anything that smacks of knowledge, fact or, God forbid, cogent analysis. Thus they have created a self-sustaining pattern of ignorance that the truth is likely never to penetrate. If there is hope, it lies in reaching the center plus telling Dem reps how we feel.

  • It seems the Republican agenda is based entirely on fallacy. Even on core issues, like small government and tax cuts, while they do in fact support such policies in regard to powerful and wealthy entities, the reality is that they are working to erode the power and wealth of the smaller individual. That even the poorest among them are willing to go along with this suggests that there is a powerful, jingoistic king-worship thing at work.... I don't think that the truth stands much of a chance.

  • Found this clip interesting thank you

  • Fucknews a place of bullshitters!!!!

  • "FoxNews" is nothing more than a lie factory! Will the truth over stop them or show them up, no. The people who really believe the things on that show are not smart enough or do not care enough for the truth they only want what fits their agenda and what forces their side on others even if that side is wrong in every way.

  • FOX NEWS RULES!

  • Politifact just reported that Maddow's claim on Letterman that But her claim that Fox News "said the New Black Panther Party decided the election for Barack Obama" is not true. Play that clip or doesn't it fit into your liberal agenda?.

  • @markhg1 lol ok..... so if we're keeping the tally thats 1 false hood for rachel Maddows, and 349848309384.334 X 2 for FOX news.

  • FOX viewers have sadly been brainwashed to believe that TRUTH = Liberal bias.

    Methinks they doth protest too much.

  • While I agree Fox News is bias, I also see MSNBC as a very bias network too. I prefer to watch MSNBC. It's my power on channel if that gives you any idea how much I like it.

    However, when you ask for evidence for other networks being combative with only one side, turn on Chris Matthews, turn on Ed Shultz. Rachel Maddow is civil with Repub guests but Matthews and Shultz are both pretty darn combative. It's driven my favor for Matthews down quite a bit. Why must he interrupt his guests?

  • @thecreativeoneish Dummy. Just follow the main topic and ponder the question at hand.

  • @thecreativeoneish I still disagree with you ... the things you said he didn't present would have served no purpose in this video and would have added nothing whatever position he has or whatever opinion someone who disagrees with him has

  • I love how, in most of this dude's videos, there's some kind of argument where somebody posts a contradicting opinion to the one expressed in the video, or just a generally anti-liberal opinion, and the liberals insult them or passive-aggressively douche at them.

  • @TazAgainstTheMachine His videos are meant to expose Fox News bias and misinformation and he does a very good job at it by showing actual facts instead of the simple and vague talking points that Fox News uses

  • PUNCTUATION!!!!!!!!!!

  • @thecreativeoneish What purpose would it serve to put that in video.. that has nothing to do with the theme presented.. who cares if she used to listen to him. When she says he is one of the most talented she is saying he is good at spreading propaganda and invoking peoples emotions to get them scared so they won't be thinking rationally and he can fill them up with his nonsense.

  • RACHEL MADDOW'S A DUDE!

  • @williejenkins666

    Really? We're claiming Climate Change isn't real again? I watch MSNBC quite often, and I never see stuff about Climate Change. So, that point sucked. Secondly I would like to ask why you believe sending a large amounts of Carbon dioxide into the atmosphere won't change the weather cycles. Common sense leads us to believe throwing the atmosphere out of balance is going to change something. Ask the Northeast how every winter gets more intense.

    Then again, you go by Willie.

  • TELL THAT TO YOUR GOD FOX NEWS BITCHES!!!!

  • conservative = care about yourself, and your group. ( In Broad Terms )

    Liberal = make a better change for everyone ( in Broad terms )

    EVIL ( Analysis) - to do harm to the larger body group for ones own self interest.

    GOOD ( Analysis ) - To do well for others even at the expense of ones own self interest.

    Conclusion - FOX IS AN EVIL CONSERVATIVE JUGGERNAUT THAT NEEDS TO BE STOPPED! THE GREEDY ALL ABOUT MYSELF NEEDS TO STOP, OH and FOX? To tell lies or not speak the whole truth is considered a sin

  • Im glad your on youtube to spread the truth. Keep exposing Fox, people will start to wake up

  • @williejenkins666 - global warming is a mainstream scientific consensus. 99% of climatologists support it. The "liberal" media believes the scientific community and reports on what they say as they should. MSNBC is surely biased considering that they are on the left wing of the corporate parties pay roll. There is a difference between presenting a biased perspective on true events and outright lying though. BTW - personal attacks are the last refuge of scoundrels - keep it civil.

  • @williejenkins666 - Gore's film is a documentary not news. You are comparing apples and oranges.

  • @williejenkins666 Limpdick doesn't threaten me any more than your limp dick does. But thanks for ignoring the substance of the video all the same. It's a good thing that you can, at least, identify the problems that harm us. I'm sure you never heard that from the mouth of Limpdick or Fox news. Too bad, like the intellectually lazy viewers of Fox, you have no solutions.

  • The important thing is Keith "Olby-boy" Olbermann got fired because he's a piece of shit liberal with crappy ratings.

    Next Rachel "John-boy" Maddow.

  • generally Fox is the symptom of the steep decline of american civilization. In 100 years America will be known as a hillbilly country.

  • In the past the ability of the media establishment to color the news was more difficult to detect, but thanks to the video revolution the average person can easily juxstaposition the conflicting rhetoric coming out of Fox. There are deep seated resentments in our society that go back to things like the civil rights movement that predispose certain sectors of our society to dislike liberalism regardless of truth.

  • I dont think it will. The right wing meme is based on our most primal emotion, fear. the bigger the lie the more it's repeated ect ect. It's to point now where many of these people have no concept of truth, none, that is but authority. For them a debate is not a way to get to the truth, via facts and reason, it is merely a competition.

  • Good work keep it up!

  • @williejenkins666 the only ones "pimping global warming" are the vast majority of scientists in the field. The handful of hacks that Fox has on are not experts in the field.

    BTW, sorry that Rachel Maddow threatens. Just because she's more man than you'll ever be and more woman than you'll ever get doesn't mean you have to act like the scared manboy with a tiny penis that you're coming off as.

  • MORE 2008 election coverage stats

    Fox News 40% of stories about Obama were negative. Compared to the average of 29%. 25% positive compared to national average of 36%. For McCain Fox ran 22% stories in a positive manor, compared to a national average of 14% positive stories. Fox ran 40% negative stories about McCain, compared to 57% national average. The other stories were deemed neutral. The media failed the nation with their pathetic coverage during election season last time around.

  • @docj09

    What's important is not whether stories are "positive" or "negative" (subjective decisions the studies you cite make for you). What's important is whether the stories are ACCURATE. A negative story about a bad campaign is not bias. Instead of counting up subjective decisions about positivity and negativity, in my videos I show a pattern of skewing FACTS to fit a partisan agenda that viewers can see for themselves at

    tinyurl(.)com/FoxNewsBias

    I hope that helps and

    thx 4 commenting :-)

  • @LiberalViewer I'd suggest to anyone who hasn't heard of Edward Bernays to wiki him or something.

    People have known since long before either of us were born; when influencing opinion, factuality holds little importance relative to emotional presentation. The vast majority of people make up their mind (come to a conclusion or decision) based on emotions, not logic. If only people foresaw the implications, we could have restricted political advertising before our democracy withered into a farce.

  • @docj09 "The media failed the nation with their pathetic coverage during election season last time around."

    If you're just now waking up, you're in for some very painful epiphanies down the road...

    For decades, corporate sponsored media has more than just failed us during elections. You are led to unknowingly cheer for the status quo by being told which candidates are acceptable, and which ones you should not take seriously. Government/corporate interests shape propaganda almost totally.

  • @docj09 If you'd remember, towards the end of the campaign, it was very difficult to find anything positive to say about the McCain campaign. I'd sit and watch the actual speeches without commentary and they did nothing but bash, and smear Obama, and talking about Bill Ayers and "real America". Fox was the only station that would comment about those speeches as legitimate, but how could anyone put a positive spin on such negative campaigning?

  • LiberalViewer is a dumbass. If Fox is so biased why is it that studies done by Forbes and Pew proved that the stories that Fox ran in the 2008 elections were BY FAR the most balanced of any news outlet. The only reason people are saying they are biased is because they don't give Obama his nightly blowjobs like everyone else. 2008 election coverage findings...MSNBC had 73% of it's stories about McCain in a negative manor. 14% negative about Obama. And Fox is the biased one lol. Stats don't lie.

  • @docj09

    Guess what, all American news stations are complete crap.

  • @sdrawkcabgnipytmi i'll have to agree with you on that one haha

  • @docj09 thats amazing.. cause the Forbes article actually outlined how unusual it was that Fox was actually delivering better news.. That article about accuracy during the 2008 election was more a criticism of the other MSM stations. Not praise for Fox.

  • @smokydave - link this article please.

  • Dude, these are loaded/pointed questions. You youtube, you decide.

  • Good vid

  • Honestly this just shows that many Americans are poorly educated and can't think for themselves. FOX is most obviously biased. They spew hate and malice, and defend themselves as if they have no idea what they did. They are the most hypocritical TV network today.

  • Yes, the people at FOX are scum.

  • Frightening Obnoxious Xenophobes 

  • FOX News doesn't cater to filthy liberal SCUM and certainly doesn't push or promote the anti-American leftwing loon vermin agenda that you disgusting leftwing parasites want

    FOX is only for real Americans, not the diseased liberal vermin that infest America so learn to shut your filthy liberal mouths and mind your own business you unwanted liberal SCUM!

    YEAH!

  • @frictionRx5 yea, so you are a real american? Get some fucking mental health . Fucking nazi punk.

  • @MrRolaids65 lolz the leftwing vermin that infest America just can't deal with the fact that everyone else in the country has rejected their demented anti-American lunatic liberal agenda

    hey liberal scum, you moonbat pigs have your own cable news network, granted MSNBCrap is a leftwing toilet and there's not enough of you loons to warrant keeping it on the air but it does spew the leftwing garbage that keeps your empty useless liberal lives going

    go listen to some old Air America tapes scum

  • @frictionRx5

    well of course msnbc is a left wing toilet but i do find it odd how Fox never actually comes out and repudiates these videos exposing their lies...

  • @anlinwang2 Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan are the biggest turds in the MSNBC toilet.

  • @frictionRx5 conservative lunatic. get mental help quick before you hurt someone innocent. 

  • @frictionRx5 dude, youre unhinged.  wipe the spittle from your mouth and unplug before you go on a shooting spree.

  • @frictionRx5 Unless REAL AMERICANS enjoyed being lied to everyday, then you're wrong.

  • @frictionRx5 your IQ is lagging behind a few dude, go go dance back to your cousin/wife and continue your family tradition of producing dumb psychotic incest offspring you right wing retard

  • yeah but its much easier to point out flaws on fox news. No news source is perfect, but fox intentionally puts false information on their programs.

  • I think you are wrong. Calling the public option "governtment run" is accurate.  It would have been the government run alternative in an otherwise open health insurance market.

    I don't believe they mean to portray the public option as equivalent to single payer.

    This one time it seems FOX might actually be reporting rather than spinning.

  • @ferretburger actually public option means that there will be a public alternative to other private options. 'GOVERNMENT RUN" means the government will run the whole thing which is a falsehood but it is precisely what the bulk of Fox viewers believed. Fox and the Right Wing media have trained their lapdogs well to be resentful of the words "government owned" or "government owned". If they truly wanted to enlighten their audience about what the differences they would have simply explained them.

  • To put it simply, Satan runs Fox News. xD

  • @SpardaDVLKing3 Id say that goes for WALMART to.

  • @SpardaDVLKing3 Satan _IS_ fox news

  • @SpardaDVLKing3 To be perfectly honest, I can't really bring myself to hate Rupert Murdoch.