man yall ppl need to stop critizing man!!! when yall could let me know which pilot nails every single landing without a bounce plz send me their names..... if anything it is more realistic because of the difficulty of the approach.... jus because its a sim doesn't mean every landing must b thousand footers and a kiss!!
I think you did a nice job. Having flown this approach numerous times in the bus, it can be disconcerting dealing with the parking garage just off the end of the runway. 27 also has no ILS glidepath, and the VASI is steeper than standard. This approach is considered mildly challenging due those factors. More so if you don't do it for a living. :0)
that was terrible.. you idled the engines too early, your first touchdown was terrible and then you bounced and it was even worse.. why would you put this up anyway?
@kharam10 hey man there is a "save flight video" or "flight video" option in the top of you tool bar... or if im not mistaken you press the ; key.. that should bring up the menu but i dont remember... all you do is fly and it records it like a savable instant replay....
@tf51d this is a hard approach i have done it in real life, adding a bit of power to cushion the touchdown on the last minute is not that big of a deal, the worst would be damaging the landing gear or even worst costing your company around $5000 for going around.
@msjacob212 Acctually, Pilots use that to sofen up there landing it is called Floating HOWEVER, the pilot in this Vid, Touchdown , added power, and Climbed again.
Hope you like it Please Comment How to walk: do it by pressing combos like Ctrl+Shift+Enter or backspace, Shift+Enter or backspace, Ctrl+Enter or backspace, used mainly for adjusting your view in t
hahahah "don´t waste my time" you reply my msg on youtube in 12 minutes hm... i can see how busy you´re.... and thanks for the "kid" i really apreciate ;D
last msg i just meant: if you can´t be polite don´t aswer nothing ..see , you don´t help me at all ...YOU waste my time =/
talkyrocko, liascm answered your question correctly, FS-Recorder is much better then the default instant replay. With it you can record the entire flight, including AI. Instant replay can't do that, and it is smoother also. You can get it at fs-recorder . net (Remove spaces) BTW it's free.
the deal is i had many many problems with addons...more than 5 times i had to uni and install again my fsx that´s why i asked a lot now, befor downloading anything to fsx, he could aswer like you just did is it that hard??! did your hand are hurt now??! I don´pt think so... i just don´t see the complexity on bein kind
you clearly dont understand english very well(on offense) you would of known that what i said in the first place wasnt rude at all, it just wasnt what you wanted to hear, you could of easily searched the information on google and use your common sense, my guess is you think im being rude now? well im not, you need to learn whats rude and what isnt
if you don´t know the aswer or don´t want to reply just...=X
if i´m asking i have a reason, like know what it does before get it, and yes i could search for the aswer on google but i prefer here, you ´re the one who need to review your method of expression yourself =/...if you don´t think that way its ok for me, the only one who should care are u
the ariane 737 is pretty good. It is totally worth the 99 bucks if you dont like flying 747s and want to stick with local flights. The textures are uber-frame-rate friendly. I get like 30-40 steady outside of the plane in New York, and my system isn't too great.
ni9ce approch, it sounded like that you went full throttle befor you touched down thats why you bounces and also you retracked the spoilers to erly, retracks when the dont slow you down anymore
He most likely got it at avsim(dot)com they are one of the best sites for repaints and such. You have to register to download them, but it's worth it.
Hey there. I loved your video. Just the bounce at the landing wasnt perfect but shit happens even at real planes. This happened to me twice with easyjet and alitalia(EUROPE). Thanx for posting
SMOOTH LANDING but FOLLER EASY ON THE THROTTLE. suppose to be like "foller easy on the pepsi". btw i have always hated the a320 witha a passion. epecially NWA a320's THEY SMELL LIKE SOME CLOGED THE TOILET! the a319 was nice but the a320 just stunk. 737 or a320? 737
Nice landing. have some constructive critism about the flare. try just before you reach the turning point on the flare. deploy speed brakes. that will get you down with out the bounce back. :). Great VFR landing :D
yeah, san diego has a little airport. the biggest plane that can land is some fed-ex plane with 3 engines that takes off at 7:30 pm every night. i live there :P
Hey does anybody knows where to get other airline planes on the other gates. LIke airport traffic. Anyone please answer. Thanks in advanced? Cool landing. (FAV)
It actually wasn't that hard a landing at all. What made me bounce was not cutting power when I should have which resulted in the skip. If the plane had a radar altimeter, it probably wouldn't have happened. Plus I'm getting better at judging distance to the ground now even without it.
Yeah! Without a radar altimeter, I misjudged the distance to the ground,and didn't chop power in time causing the bounce. I have gotten better at it as time has gone on. At least I'm not bouncing anymore!!!
Did you come up with that brainstorm all yourself? Jets fly visual approaches all the time in clear weather. Whether or not they use automation for all or part of the approach is pilots discretion. Usually they will use the AP down to about 500, and fly it in manually from there. Plus there are airports that require visual approaches, such as the DCA Rnwy19 river visual. I suggest you watch the video below. What's that I hear "Virgin 19 Heavy Cleared Visual..
Commercial liners need to go IFR because you can not be VFR above 18,000ft. and jets rarely go below that. To use the autopilot you must have the ILS tuned in, and ILS is only IFR. Your confusing the technical with the reality. A lot of times pilots will TECHNICALLY be going ifr, but as you said they will be using the visual of the runway (however they have to fly it manually if they choose to do it that way).
Also, that is San Diego, so it is not visually required. A big jet, in this case an A320, going visual into San Diego would simply not happen. The closest thing to that that would happen is the pilots would be IFR, but owuld be using the visual of the runway for the landing, thus flying it manually. However, you did get me curious with that video. I would look into it more if I thought that possible.
Also I am astonished that 32,000 people would waste their time watching this...
One Runway 27 at KSAN does not have an ILS, it's a LOC/DME approach. When you are on approach you are well below FL180, so it's perfectly normal for any aircraft to fly visual if the weather conditions are good. You are only required to use instruments in IMC conditions.
That's true, however you can't change it in flight. For example if the weather is great but I want to cruize at Fl270, I can't go IFR so I can get that high and then once on approach change to VFR. However if your IFR that doesnt mean you cant use the visual of the runway (in fact it's required in the minimums, except for CatIII class C.) so although the controller will clear you for an ILS approach, that doesn't mean you are obligated to use your ILS indicator, unless the visibility is low.
I think we're saying the samething now, just around about way of saying it. We weren't talking about enroute IFR vs VFR, only Visual vs instrument approaches. Of which are controlled by the conditions at the destination airport. Of which if the conditions call for visual it's at pilots discretion whether to fly it manual or use the AP for all or part of the approach, more commonly they'll fly auto to 500ft then fly it manually (If ILS equipped approach) KSAN Rnwy 27 doesn't have a full ILS.
If you are flying IFR enroute, generally you would not cancel your IFR clearance even though your approach is visual, just in case conditions at the airport deteriorate to Instrument Approach conditions.
ive flown into san diego before and i like the speed of video is dead on. everything was moving just as fast as it would in a real plane. love the graphics!
I would steer away from anything AMD, and look at Intel C2D's first. They out perform AMD's right now on every level. My system is an E6850 with 2GB and a 8800GT. (Although this video was shot with my old system R.I.P. a E6700 2GB ATI 1950XTX crossfires. My new system performs even better with it's 1333mhz FSB.
i just got fsx. can some one help plsss i dnt knwo whats wrong i put the graphics to the full and everything is still shit it is also very slow loke in slow motion. i changed the display settings but nothing hapened i also changed the RAM to 1GB can some one tell me whats wrong??
hey i need your help .. i just got fsx and when i finally finished installion it said activte now and the other opoin was to activate later .. so when i clicked active now its said PLEASE ENTER YOUR 25-CHARACTER PRODUCT KEY BELOW...what do i do plz help
OK...FIRST: look obove the disks...you should find a golden-yellow sticker that says PRODUCT KEY: (THEN YOUR NUMBER) SECOND: YOU NEED TO HAVE INTERNET CONNECTION. THIRD: I only got 2 disks and mine works fine.
Nice but could we see something besides the wing view next time?
junkaccount4297 3 months ago
@junkaccount4297 Well you can choose from the 164 other videos I published! :LOL:
tf51d 3 months ago
Lolz, I had the same exact view of SD on the way home from New York.
FutureMarine1775USA 3 months ago
nice landing only prob was that u balooned and landed late..
MrShev001 5 months ago
man yall ppl need to stop critizing man!!! when yall could let me know which pilot nails every single landing without a bounce plz send me their names..... if anything it is more realistic because of the difficulty of the approach.... jus because its a sim doesn't mean every landing must b thousand footers and a kiss!!
242boiz 8 months ago
Great vid! Is this default scenery or Megasceneryx SoCal or something else? Thanks in advance.
intercepter1 9 months ago
I think you did a nice job. Having flown this approach numerous times in the bus, it can be disconcerting dealing with the parking garage just off the end of the runway. 27 also has no ILS glidepath, and the VASI is steeper than standard. This approach is considered mildly challenging due those factors. More so if you don't do it for a living. :0)
sclingeman 1 year ago
u messed up a craplot!! 1/5
FSPROX 1 year ago
where did you get the repaint?
pilotso 1 year ago
i always do this approach... klax to ksan
DMAfighter 1 year ago
do you have fs recoder... if not, wat do you use to record your videos?
bcolemaqn16 1 year ago
that was terrible.. you idled the engines too early, your first touchdown was terrible and then you bounced and it was even worse.. why would you put this up anyway?
aolambros 1 year ago
You got pretty close to the buildings.
intellegence63smart 1 year ago
u pounnced on the runway....but nice city traffic
loopas1 1 year ago
nice landing
yugiohg5d 1 year ago
@yugiohg5d not really
milesthemelonator 1 year ago
@milesthemelonator it was alright
yugiohg5d 1 year ago
your going to fast and your alorrans are not moving
flightsim666 1 year ago
hey how did u get the ai traffic to appear in ur video? Did u use the replay option or were u flying the plane and video taping at the same time?
kharam10 1 year ago
@kharam10 hey man there is a "save flight video" or "flight video" option in the top of you tool bar... or if im not mistaken you press the ; key.. that should bring up the menu but i dont remember... all you do is fly and it records it like a savable instant replay....
DeadTallyNo9 1 year ago
@KirkHammettable probally sea tac, jfk, or slc. but most likely new york im assuming...
mobility12 2 years ago
sorry but u screwed up. we can see it when you are close to runway and add power than go up. that was shit but nice traffic 3/5
msjacob212 2 years ago
The problem wasn't adding power, but misjudging when to cut power. Easy to do with a jet without a radar altimeter, or GPWS!
tf51d 2 years ago 4
@tf51d this is a hard approach i have done it in real life, adding a bit of power to cushion the touchdown on the last minute is not that big of a deal, the worst would be damaging the landing gear or even worst costing your company around $5000 for going around.
Ale290690 4 months ago
@msjacob212 Acctually, Pilots use that to sofen up there landing it is called Floating HOWEVER, the pilot in this Vid, Touchdown , added power, and Climbed again.
4/5
dyl962 1 year ago
you fucked up you r going to fast and your aloranins are not moving you fail
flightsim666 1 year ago
@msjacob212 I have so many problems landing at this airport
bcolemaqn16 1 year ago
@NASCARRELIC
flew
pascal1029 2 years ago
nice landing do u have a link for download
countrytalk97 2 years ago
your a good pilot
piratesonline1 2 years ago
give it in fsx a free world? or only routes? i like this game, and i want buy it! ..
OneLoveOneCrew 2 years ago 2
FSX is a free world.. you can do any route in anywhere in the world you wish to. make sure you have a good PC though!
volcom1722 2 years ago
OMG awesome graphics and nice landing but ya bounced up a little but it was still good, and the cars werent crappy like default fsx geez
mopo150 2 years ago
awsome landing of fsx!
one of my favorites!
EP1997 2 years ago
what is the website for overland??
brandon23408 2 years ago
Big tie bounce there dude :)
masterhidsert1043 2 years ago
Correction: Big time bounce there
masterhidsert1043 2 years ago
no traffic or weather, no wonder he gets good fps!
oingoboingo12 2 years ago
Take another look, there's clouds (Real Weather at the time) Road Traffic, and Air Traffic)
tf51d 2 years ago
sorry, right after i posted that i saw the air traffic and weather. my bad
oingoboingo12 2 years ago
Hope you like it Please Comment How to walk: do it by pressing combos like Ctrl+Shift+Enter or backspace, Shift+Enter or backspace, Ctrl+Enter or backspace, used mainly for adjusting your view in t
mihai99999999999 2 years ago
holy shit its amazing
dahangsmen 2 years ago
absolutely wonderful! I felt like I was actually flying into SAN! Great Job!
Cavanair 2 years ago
Say what??? Where did that come from me?
tf51d 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
go away troll... No one cares how good you are at VIRTUAL flying
usmeagle91 2 years ago
That's the only thing I miss about FSX, the graphics.
motokid032 2 years ago
what did you record it with? In replay my ailerons don't move...
fsimpro 2 years ago
thats because you use the built in instant replay on FSX, you need to download something like fsrecorder
liascm 2 years ago
you mean ...when you have that kind of problem you can´t fix?? ...i have to download another program for that?are you sure that´s the only way?
talkyrocko 2 years ago
just download it dude instead of asking 100 questions
liascm 2 years ago
=o WTF ...dat was extremely unnecessary...just don´t say nothing stupid _l_
talkyrocko 2 years ago
kid dont waste my time, i helped you out, its not as if im telling you to buy something to fix it.
liascm 2 years ago
hahahah "don´t waste my time" you reply my msg on youtube in 12 minutes hm... i can see how busy you´re.... and thanks for the "kid" i really apreciate ;D
last msg i just meant: if you can´t be polite don´t aswer nothing ..see , you don´t help me at all ...YOU waste my time =/
talkyrocko 2 years ago
talkyrocko, liascm answered your question correctly, FS-Recorder is much better then the default instant replay. With it you can record the entire flight, including AI. Instant replay can't do that, and it is smoother also. You can get it at fs-recorder . net (Remove spaces) BTW it's free.
tf51d 2 years ago
the deal is i had many many problems with addons...more than 5 times i had to uni and install again my fsx that´s why i asked a lot now, befor downloading anything to fsx, he could aswer like you just did is it that hard??! did your hand are hurt now??! I don´pt think so... i just don´t see the complexity on bein kind
talkyrocko 2 years ago
you clearly dont understand english very well(on offense) you would of known that what i said in the first place wasnt rude at all, it just wasnt what you wanted to hear, you could of easily searched the information on google and use your common sense, my guess is you think im being rude now? well im not, you need to learn whats rude and what isnt
liascm 2 years ago
let´s put your opinion like....
"hey, what time is it?"
"why don´t you buy a watch instead of asking ?"
if you don´t know the aswer or don´t want to reply just...=X
if i´m asking i have a reason, like know what it does before get it, and yes i could search for the aswer on google but i prefer here, you ´re the one who need to review your method of expression yourself =/...if you don´t think that way its ok for me, the only one who should care are u
talkyrocko 2 years ago
Actually it was more like
Talkyrocko - Hey What Time is it?
Liascm - 1PM
Talkyrocko - Are you sure it's 1PM
then
Liascm - Why don't you buy a watch instead of asking the same question twice?
tf51d 2 years ago
but, i only ask one time ....
haahaha
talkyrocko 2 years ago
unfair
talkyrocko 2 years ago
OMG!.... that was ABOSOLUTLY AMAZING what are your pc expecification?
wuarito13 2 years ago
ur pretty good 5/5 : )
evilmuffin911 2 years ago
No my approach speed was fine, I bounced, because I misjudged my flare, and didn't cut engines in time before I touched down resulting in the bounce.
tf51d 2 years ago
what plane did you use?
torpedeteme 2 years ago
read the More info
JetBlue Airbus A320 ;)
dgmxviana 2 years ago
nice landing
Atli23 2 years ago
if i install this game then uninstall it will i lose memory
lapper50 2 years ago
can anyone tell me hoe you're supposed to fly the 27 ILS apprch at ksan on fs2004 in fog???
muzikman183 2 years ago
anyone know how to on the wiper??
lyerid 3 years ago
you cant, unless the plane you got can do it such as PMDG 747 or ariane 737
poisunoskid 2 years ago
the ariane 737 is pretty good. It is totally worth the 99 bucks if you dont like flying 747s and want to stick with local flights. The textures are uber-frame-rate friendly. I get like 30-40 steady outside of the plane in New York, and my system isn't too great.
FlightSimulatorXATC 2 years ago
at 3:35 isnt that building a little too close?
boeingt 3 years ago
Nice landing... and nice quality too
raykrislianggi 3 years ago
what was your air traffic setting high???because i want myne in a realistic setting.
boeing0417 3 years ago
Great landing dude
boeing0417 3 years ago
how'd u turn on the lights lol
2god2btru 3 years ago
It's pretty cool watching them drop the landing gear 10NM south from my house out here in Alpine..I'd like to know where they are coming from.
motokid032 3 years ago
Does this add on use the FMC, cause I prefer no FMC. I just wanna fly, not have to deal with codes and complications like most payware planes :P
CarterBoyy227 3 years ago
very good approach but not the best landing, what is your specs?
liascm 3 years ago
ni9ce approch, it sounded like that you went full throttle befor you touched down thats why you bounces and also you retracked the spoilers to erly, retracks when the dont slow you down anymore
TDJP123 3 years ago
Very nice approach
jjtc100 3 years ago
Where did you get the repaint for the Overland airbus? Please Reply
JetlinerXPilotXFSX 3 years ago
He most likely got it at avsim(dot)com they are one of the best sites for repaints and such. You have to register to download them, but it's worth it.
CarterBoyy227 3 years ago
nice approach dont worry about the bounce.also i think u might of retracted the spoilers a little to early.
colin313 3 years ago
Hey there. I loved your video. Just the bounce at the landing wasnt perfect but shit happens even at real planes. This happened to me twice with easyjet and alitalia(EUROPE). Thanx for posting
joey21tribiani 3 years ago
yea i said it was good. and just gave him constructive criticism. I thought he might like it coming from someone who earns there living doing this...
6384004836 3 years ago
SMOOTH LANDING but FOLLER EASY ON THE THROTTLE. suppose to be like "foller easy on the pepsi". btw i have always hated the a320 witha a passion. epecially NWA a320's THEY SMELL LIKE SOME CLOGED THE TOILET! the a319 was nice but the a320 just stunk. 737 or a320? 737
AMT4245 3 years ago
aw. the bounce on the landing is such a shame. nice vid though!
DunderMifflinpeople 3 years ago
Great you´re the best!!!
FsxCaptain 3 years ago
how you put the 757 as you traffic
roadblockakapc 3 years ago
Its add on traffic, Called "World of AI"
mooo483 3 years ago
Nice landing. have some constructive critism about the flare. try just before you reach the turning point on the flare. deploy speed brakes. that will get you down with out the bounce back. :). Great VFR landing :D
6384004836 3 years ago
y were people giving thumbs down? THUMBS UP 6384004836!
AMT4245 3 years ago
Very smooth flying. Good landing.
suburbanstyles 3 years ago
your an ecellent pilot!
raikkonenislikeagod 3 years ago
Great vid
DaKyl3st3r 3 years ago
Wow! those are some excellent FPS!
speedbird125 3 years ago
grr where is everyone gettin jetblue skin i cant seem to find it lol
longest22 3 years ago
Great landing. Those buildings at 3:34 are kinda too close for comfort. :)
CommanderDenton 3 years ago
yeah, san diego has a little airport. the biggest plane that can land is some fed-ex plane with 3 engines that takes off at 7:30 pm every night. i live there :P
wowdude999 3 years ago
MD11, DC10. One of those.
suburbanstyles 3 years ago
It's an Airbus. :/
Apollo580 3 years ago
A320
Jacobdead 3 years ago
Great landing
Andregarry4 3 years ago
lol gotta love that san diego traffic... great vid.. i have fsx but gotta get somethin more powerful to run it..
muzikman183 3 years ago
beautiful video !!!!!! where you downloaded the companies? thanks!
marco9it 3 years ago
how you make these videos? what is the program
plz answer
AndrePortugal92 3 years ago
make is seem so realistic :)
where did you get the a320 from?
pegasusfc 3 years ago
It comes with the game.
Apollo580 3 years ago
No it's the Overland A320 from the airbus collection. The JetBlue livery came from AVSIM.
tf51d 3 years ago
how can u see the runway from the wingview?
WebGalore 3 years ago
its a replay
tussisussi 3 years ago
or a vid
lama24alwayz 3 years ago
Is this suppose to be a dumb blond joke?
shadowamazon 3 years ago
well you got annyways nice graphics -.-
levikulhan 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
boring movie
caranze 3 years ago
Hey does anybody knows where to get other airline planes on the other gates. LIke airport traffic. Anyone please answer. Thanks in advanced? Cool landing. (FAV)
dxalfredo 3 years ago
See the ProjectAI website.
nighthawk808 3 years ago
3:35 almost hit a building
PFlolPF 3 years ago
the aircraft and sounds is a payware add on, go to a search engine and search Overland Airbus A320
mooo483 3 years ago
OMG the senery is beautiful can you please do a night landing but making sure we see the car senery
Niyabrock 3 years ago
Thanks! I'll try and do it sometime this weekend!!
tf51d 3 years ago
It actually wasn't that hard a landing at all. What made me bounce was not cutting power when I should have which resulted in the skip. If the plane had a radar altimeter, it probably wouldn't have happened. Plus I'm getting better at judging distance to the ground now even without it.
tf51d 3 years ago
nice vid but bad landing
yevgeni2905 3 years ago
Yeah! Without a radar altimeter, I misjudged the distance to the ground,and didn't chop power in time causing the bounce. I have gotten better at it as time has gone on. At least I'm not bouncing anymore!!!
tf51d 3 years ago
you overshot and then had a hard landing, i hate when that happens
jllarkins 3 years ago
You must have a monster computer.
Devast8ion 3 years ago
a320 going visual....thats realistic.
And your video concept was very original as well.
frogbop 3 years ago
were you being sarcastic?
emosandknives 3 years ago
yes.
frogbop 3 years ago
its perfectly realistic you fuckup
emosandknives 3 years ago
lol. Big jets never go VFR. Noob.
frogbop 3 years ago
Did you come up with that brainstorm all yourself? Jets fly visual approaches all the time in clear weather. Whether or not they use automation for all or part of the approach is pilots discretion. Usually they will use the AP down to about 500, and fly it in manually from there. Plus there are airports that require visual approaches, such as the DCA Rnwy19 river visual. I suggest you watch the video below. What's that I hear "Virgin 19 Heavy Cleared Visual..
youtube(.)com/watch?v=pl-TWH93qTY
tf51d 3 years ago
Commercial liners need to go IFR because you can not be VFR above 18,000ft. and jets rarely go below that. To use the autopilot you must have the ILS tuned in, and ILS is only IFR. Your confusing the technical with the reality. A lot of times pilots will TECHNICALLY be going ifr, but as you said they will be using the visual of the runway (however they have to fly it manually if they choose to do it that way).
frogbop 3 years ago
Also, that is San Diego, so it is not visually required. A big jet, in this case an A320, going visual into San Diego would simply not happen. The closest thing to that that would happen is the pilots would be IFR, but owuld be using the visual of the runway for the landing, thus flying it manually. However, you did get me curious with that video. I would look into it more if I thought that possible.
Also I am astonished that 32,000 people would waste their time watching this...
frogbop 3 years ago
One Runway 27 at KSAN does not have an ILS, it's a LOC/DME approach. When you are on approach you are well below FL180, so it's perfectly normal for any aircraft to fly visual if the weather conditions are good. You are only required to use instruments in IMC conditions.
tf51d 3 years ago
That's true, however you can't change it in flight. For example if the weather is great but I want to cruize at Fl270, I can't go IFR so I can get that high and then once on approach change to VFR. However if your IFR that doesnt mean you cant use the visual of the runway (in fact it's required in the minimums, except for CatIII class C.) so although the controller will clear you for an ILS approach, that doesn't mean you are obligated to use your ILS indicator, unless the visibility is low.
frogbop 3 years ago
I think we're saying the samething now, just around about way of saying it. We weren't talking about enroute IFR vs VFR, only Visual vs instrument approaches. Of which are controlled by the conditions at the destination airport. Of which if the conditions call for visual it's at pilots discretion whether to fly it manual or use the AP for all or part of the approach, more commonly they'll fly auto to 500ft then fly it manually (If ILS equipped approach) KSAN Rnwy 27 doesn't have a full ILS.
tf51d 3 years ago
that's pretty much it. Just remember that flying it with the ILS doesn't mean your flying it automaticaly....many pilots fly ILS's by hand.
frogbop 3 years ago
If you are flying IFR enroute, generally you would not cancel your IFR clearance even though your approach is visual, just in case conditions at the airport deteriorate to Instrument Approach conditions.
tf51d 3 years ago
What a poor noob
kobefan9 3 years ago 2
agreed, but the flight plans are ifr
mogofou 3 years ago
I wish I could play on that graphic card.
DunderMifflinpeople 3 years ago
nice landing
10000MHz 3 years ago 2
Where did you get the airplane?
willsflix 3 years ago
answeing for him its airbus expansion pack i think
emosandknives 3 years ago
So in order to get graphics like this u have to put all the graphic setting the maximum level or do u need a specific computer???
CR1257 3 years ago 2
See my upcoming settings videos (2 Parts), should be uploaded tonight!!
tf51d 3 years ago
wah graphic so good...
bagadus1 3 years ago 2
ive flown into san diego before and i like the speed of video is dead on. everything was moving just as fast as it would in a real plane. love the graphics!
gsi2006 3 years ago 3
THAT LOOKS SO REAL!
videoman223 3 years ago
awesome! i know this approach all too well cause i sit somewhere around that seat every time i fly into KSAN
izanti 3 years ago
i would give one of my kidneys for a computer like this
Lakerplayer8 3 years ago
You too? lol
Apollo580 3 years ago
Have you put all of the graphic settings up to their maximum level under the setting menu?
tomchittock 3 years ago
where did you get that plane from?
CHUNKO1232123 4 years ago
In his video description he says its the Overland model. You can buy their Fly Into the Sky Airbus edition from simMarket dot com
SWFan77 4 years ago
There are addons that you get just type it in on ebay or sommat
movieman162 4 years ago
must've been a road block. that traffic was crazy!!i mean the road traffic in the city.
jimbotrains 4 years ago
thats a nice looking plane. where'd you get it?
Bigarceus 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Overland. READ THE FUCKING DESCRIPTION
Title27GT 4 years ago
In his video description he says its the Overland model. You can buy their Fly Into the Sky Airbus edition from simMarket dot com
SWFan77 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i am using a 7600GS and watch my new video =o
rushcruiser 4 years ago
I'm getting an AMD 64 Dual Core X2 6000+ 3.0 Ghz 8800GT Power Gamer how well will that do with this game???
bstep13 4 years ago
I would steer away from anything AMD, and look at Intel C2D's first. They out perform AMD's right now on every level. My system is an E6850 with 2GB and a 8800GT. (Although this video was shot with my old system R.I.P. a E6700 2GB ATI 1950XTX crossfires. My new system performs even better with it's 1333mhz FSB.
tf51d 4 years ago
you want xp vista sucks and you go to settings set everyhing to ultra high if it doesn't look good then you would need a better graphics card.
CHUNKO1232123 4 years ago
3 things:
1)what r your computer specks
2)what kind of computer are u using (alienware, whatever)
3)are u on the highest quality settings?
thnx
laska525 4 years ago
great job i love seeing videos of people landing in my hometown
mooo483 4 years ago
what kind of computer do u have
mooo483 4 years ago
plz check the trailer of the fsx JFF movie!!!
ninjahua 4 years ago
i just got fsx. can some one help plsss i dnt knwo whats wrong i put the graphics to the full and everything is still shit it is also very slow loke in slow motion. i changed the display settings but nothing hapened i also changed the RAM to 1GB can some one tell me whats wrong??
FTlupo 4 years ago
ur computer may not be good enough to handle everything on high, thats my computers problem, but the game is fine, its just ur computer
mooo483 4 years ago
Hide Marked as spam
0 Poor comment Good comment
Reply | Spam
hey i need your help .. i just got fsx and when i finally finished installion it said activte now and the other opoin was to activate later .. so when i clicked active now its said PLEASE ENTER YOUR 25-CHARACTER PRODUCT KEY BELOW...what do i do plz help
chalo1boy 4 years ago
Inside the package where the discs were right above it is the product key, enter it when asked!
tf51d 4 years ago
OK...FIRST: look obove the disks...you should find a golden-yellow sticker that says PRODUCT KEY: (THEN YOUR NUMBER) SECOND: YOU NEED TO HAVE INTERNET CONNECTION. THIRD: I only got 2 disks and mine works fine.
GOOD LUCK
b747dude 4 years ago