Here is a fact this present global warming sequence is the coolest peaking only 1.5 degrees celcius above normal, the last global warming sequence was 6.5 degrees celcius above normal, thats right folks, this current global warming sequence is 5 full degrees celius coller than the last Global Warming sequence that occurred over 100,000 years ago, explain that.
I have always been stunned by how STEADY earth's climate has been (say, before Industrial Revolution): this tiny little ball out in the vacuum of space with an avg temp of 3 K separated from the sun by millions of miles: one would think the slightest orbital changes by an asteroid would create ENORMOUS swings in global average temp.
So, what humans are doing to it now is UNIMAGINABLY stupid.
Actually, I think a better way to get across to the public
@mphello ... the deniers are a hopeless bunch of dangerous zombies tied into their coal-industry-funded cult; we'll just have to arrest them and throw them into prison for committing treason against the United States and crimes against humanity)
is not to focus so much on this single variable of temperature: since, after all "6 degrees out of 273" doesn't sound like much, but upon the TOTAL ADDITIONAL ENERGY (in terajoules) absorbed by the oceans and air caused human emissions.
Well in my country it s 30 degrees now and that''s not normal for the time off the year
Normaly we see those temperatures in august and last winter we had a very cold winter with allot of snow (60 days)thats also not normal for our winters theres something chancing no doubt about that.
Okay. This is simply bullshit. I'd love for someone to explain how its still cold as fuck here in Manitoba. I bet you can't...yet according to this crap it's supposed to be nice as we enjoy our lovely -30C. This video is crap. How in the hell is it warmer in the arctic than the equator?...yeah...bullshit.
@TempestStormwind lol...so basically this video is telling me what I already know. I live in a prairie region...wow...what a shock that we get temp fluctuations. Videos like this complete mislead and cause hysteria for no damn reason. We are not warming up here any more than we have gotten colder in expected intervals throughout it's history. "anomaly"?...still equals bullshit since this also includes cold drops...so again...this video is bullshit.
pleaz dont read diz. u wil get kissed on da nearest posible friday by da lov of yo life. 2morow wil be da best day of yo life. how ever if u dont post dis to at least 3 videos u wil die witin 2 days. now u started readin dont stop dis iz so scary. send dis over to 5 videos in 143 minutes. wen u finished press F6 an yo crushes name wil appear on da screen in big letters. dis iz so scary cuz it actually works
@belegulo notice the trend! we are breaking records across the globe. see high temps we never seen before and people like you still think humans cannot affect the climate? Even though micro-organisms millions of years ago were able to affect the environment and kill themselves off, humans cannot? you are a great example of the ignorance in this world......grow a brain, get a clue and open your eyes..........
@504pro "Even though micro-organisms millions of years ago were able to affect the environment and kill themselves off, humans cannot? "
they did nothing bad, they only changer the earth, we are doing something lika that is not neccessarely bad, but is a change as other especes have done.
@belegulo That might be true, but human civilization *can* be measured in thousands of years. If global temperatures continue to rise at around +0.16 degrees per decade, then our civilization might have as little as 100 years left. How much more empirical do you want?
@ORACLE063 If they did that, it would show that, from 1890-1940, average sunspot numbers-per cycle-increased significantly. It would then show a stable period for 1940-1970, followed by a decline in average sunspot numbers per cycle for 1970-2010. Solar Physicists have shown that there is a strong correlation between sunspot numbers & global temperatures for the last 8,000 years or more-but that this correlation breaks down completely around the 1950's.
For anyone interested in keeping up with global temperature (maps & graphs) and United States climate data, NASA GISS and NCDC have great info and analysis.
"The global-average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly soared to +0.72 deg. C in January, 2010. This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record." - Roy Spencer
"2009: Second Warmest Year on Record; End of Warmest Decade"
"2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis, conducted by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the warmest year since modern records began in 1880. "
"January 2000 to December 2009 was the warmest decade on record. Throughout the last three decades, the GISS surface temperature record shows an upward trend of about 0.2°C (0.36°F) per decade."
The video shows the global temperature change relative to the base period 1951-1980 climatology. Basically the global temperature change compared to the 30-year period (1951-80) global average temperature.
1) See the original at the NASA website. There's some explanation that I found helpful.
2) clausenogbach: The video shows the average increase in temps; so the increase was greater in Antarctica than in Africa
3) frednoname1: You're correct - there wouldn't have been remotely-sensed data for anywhere in 1884. Anything before the 1960's would be based on extrapolation from other data (ice cores, etc.)
"State of the Climate Global Analysis Annual 2009"
Global Highlights:
*The 2000-2009 decade is the warmest on record, with an average global surface temperature of 0.54°C (0.96°F) above the 20th century average. This shattered the 1990s value of 0.36°C (0.65°F).
*Ocean surface temperatures (through December) tied with 2002 and 2004 as the fourth warmest on record, at 0.48°C (0.86°F) above the 20th century average.
If this animation is representing temperature like an ir camera i can not understand how parts of Antartica can be hotter than central Africa from time to time?????
Even if global warming is complete political BS it doesn't mean we should disrespect our Mother Earth. We are her children, every last one of us. So listen to her, not to these lying evil bastards we call leaders. Nature is the the True authority!
Every planet in the solar system is warmer than usual at the moment. It has little to do with our Industry. That crap excuse has only ever been used for political leverage. It's biggest load of utter bullshit the government have ever vomitted! 1000's of PhD scientists have all said the same thing. It's completely natural.
It's interesting that they cut off the date at 1884- when you do that, you're shutting off the possibility that an even WARMER than today existed. For all we know, this "global warming" could be nothing.
What you should have said was "For all I know..."
For those that have studied this issue there is no credible debate. Read what all of our historically reliable scientific institutions have said; humans are warming the planet with the use of fossil fuels and through deforestation.
Sure, natural changes in climate have, do, and will continue to occur. They've been taken into consideration.
Here's a good site where you can learn more about this.
Not surface temperature. Otherwise you could ask how come it is red in Arctic and blue in Africa. This shows the deviance of temperature from the MEDIAN of the year. You are quite ignorant.
I think the color means hotter (or colder) than average. So red in the Arctic doesn't mean the Arctic is hotter than the Carribean, it just means it's hotter than average for the Arctic.
Capilot is correct: This is temperature *anomaly* -- the difference between the temperature at the point in time the video's showing and some reference temperature (which is, for GISS, the average of all temperatures between 1951 and 1980). That's why that timespan has the most white (zero anomaly) areas.
There is a difference between temperature anomaly and absolute temperature.
To see the base data used in this video (more pretty pictures), visit here:
@TempestStormwind Holy crap - first the title says earth surface temperature, which obviously it is not (arctic warmer than the equator) and then the title is explained as temperature anomaly - which it obviously is also not ... Greenland warmer in 1929 than in 1971 ... huh? huh? And the most worrying aspect is that this is a video released by NASA and GISS. Something is very, very wrong with their climate data. Thanks for strengthening the doubt sceptics have over NASA temp. data.
@oomblikkies It's common in these circles to refer to temperature anomaly. Every temperature analysis group does this - even Dr. Roy Spencer and Dr. John Christy at the UAH use temperature anomaly, and they're skeptical of climate change.
The maps are generated by NASA GISS but you can get nearly identical maps (for any given year; then composite them like this video) from the Hadley center (tinyurl /4n64pbf), which uses a different analysis (and different baseline).
@TempestStormwind And honestly...who really cares if the earth warms up?...by then we'll be long gone. Truth is the outer crust of the earth is only a small factor in the planet sustaining itself. Now if the planet core starts to increase dramatically then I'll be worried. If I dig a hole 50 feet and it turns out to be 10C instead of 5C I'll start scratching my head. Things change...why is this concept so damn illusive to people?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This video is very unrealistic. It seems as though someone has simply added an After Effect filter to a map and to animate shifts in temperature. So according to this video, in 1956 the antartic and artic were hotter than the equator and in 1996, Russia was the hottest country on earth.
They haven't exactly put much thought or common sense into this video.
I could be wrong though, as a few have mentioned below that the colours are relating to variations in temperature difference in different countries, so it may not be actually temperature, more the oscillations.
Where did you get the temperature reading from 1884? Hey also don't forget to pay for your environmental fees. The more you pay the sooner hearth will recover it's temperature.
Muy fácil BatchDrake... si en el polo note había una temperatura de -80ºC y 10 años después había solo -50ºC se ha producido una oscilación positiva de 30ºC... Si en el África ecuatorial la oscilación ha sido desde +30ºC a +40ºC la oscilación tan solo ha sido de +10ºC
En resumen.. ese gráfico indica oscilaciones de temperatura no la temperatura en si misma..
Here is a fact this present global warming sequence is the coolest peaking only 1.5 degrees celcius above normal, the last global warming sequence was 6.5 degrees celcius above normal, thats right folks, this current global warming sequence is 5 full degrees celius coller than the last Global Warming sequence that occurred over 100,000 years ago, explain that.
Achaylus 1 week ago
It would be wise to look at the Global temperatures today as abrupt cooling has set in and our Sun now mimics the Dalton minimum..
david222444 1 month ago
2011 Arctic sea ice extent 36 % Below normal !!
newnejm2 5 months ago
I have always been stunned by how STEADY earth's climate has been (say, before Industrial Revolution): this tiny little ball out in the vacuum of space with an avg temp of 3 K separated from the sun by millions of miles: one would think the slightest orbital changes by an asteroid would create ENORMOUS swings in global average temp.
So, what humans are doing to it now is UNIMAGINABLY stupid.
Actually, I think a better way to get across to the public
(you can't do anything with the deniers
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello ... the deniers are a hopeless bunch of dangerous zombies tied into their coal-industry-funded cult; we'll just have to arrest them and throw them into prison for committing treason against the United States and crimes against humanity)
is not to focus so much on this single variable of temperature: since, after all "6 degrees out of 273" doesn't sound like much, but upon the TOTAL ADDITIONAL ENERGY (in terajoules) absorbed by the oceans and air caused human emissions.
mphello 6 months ago
natural climate change nothing to do with us,
somethinextra 8 months ago
Well in my country it s 30 degrees now and that''s not normal for the time off the year
Normaly we see those temperatures in august and last winter we had a very cold winter with allot of snow (60 days)thats also not normal for our winters theres something chancing no doubt about that.
luna252525 10 months ago
Okay. This is simply bullshit. I'd love for someone to explain how its still cold as fuck here in Manitoba. I bet you can't...yet according to this crap it's supposed to be nice as we enjoy our lovely -30C. This video is crap. How in the hell is it warmer in the arctic than the equator?...yeah...bullshit.
magicyte 1 year ago
@magicyte It's not warmer in Manitoba. Relative to the average temperatures between 1951 and 1980, Manitoba has warmed up faster than the equator.
That is what this map is showing - temperature *anomaly* (difference from some reference point).
You can find the full procedure complete with openly-accessible source code, on the NASA GISS website and in the peer reviewed literature.
We've also expected the arctic to warm faster than the equator since the 1979 Charney Report.
TempestStormwind 1 year ago
@TempestStormwind lol...so basically this video is telling me what I already know. I live in a prairie region...wow...what a shock that we get temp fluctuations. Videos like this complete mislead and cause hysteria for no damn reason. We are not warming up here any more than we have gotten colder in expected intervals throughout it's history. "anomaly"?...still equals bullshit since this also includes cold drops...so again...this video is bullshit.
magicyte 1 year ago 2
OMG there were satellites in 1800!!
nayungagarr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
pleaz dont read diz. u wil get kissed on da nearest posible friday by da lov of yo life. 2morow wil be da best day of yo life. how ever if u dont post dis to at least 3 videos u wil die witin 2 days. now u started readin dont stop dis iz so scary. send dis over to 5 videos in 143 minutes. wen u finished press F6 an yo crushes name wil appear on da screen in big letters. dis iz so scary cuz it actually works
TheAwesomevic 1 year ago
Be Happy with Asian bride *lushfmlk.info*
KATHRINPAVONuh 1 year ago
this is not real it is a phony vid, its NOT from NASA
vonriktoven 1 year ago
@vonriktoven how you know?
504pro 1 year ago
Earth have million of years; not thousands. So, this graphic is not empirical.
belegulo 1 year ago
@belegulo notice the trend! we are breaking records across the globe. see high temps we never seen before and people like you still think humans cannot affect the climate? Even though micro-organisms millions of years ago were able to affect the environment and kill themselves off, humans cannot? you are a great example of the ignorance in this world......grow a brain, get a clue and open your eyes..........
504pro 1 year ago
@504pro "Even though micro-organisms millions of years ago were able to affect the environment and kill themselves off, humans cannot? "
they did nothing bad, they only changer the earth, we are doing something lika that is not neccessarely bad, but is a change as other especes have done.
belegulo 1 year ago
@belegulo That might be true, but human civilization *can* be measured in thousands of years. If global temperatures continue to rise at around +0.16 degrees per decade, then our civilization might have as little as 100 years left. How much more empirical do you want?
MrHicks091 1 year ago 2
They should show the solar cycle at the bottom left
ORACLE063 1 year ago
@ORACLE063 If they did that, it would show that, from 1890-1940, average sunspot numbers-per cycle-increased significantly. It would then show a stable period for 1940-1970, followed by a decline in average sunspot numbers per cycle for 1970-2010. Solar Physicists have shown that there is a strong correlation between sunspot numbers & global temperatures for the last 8,000 years or more-but that this correlation breaks down completely around the 1950's.
MrHicks091 1 year ago
jajungs aus De? Bin total einsam wer hat lust zu schreibn
GwennBottolenee1 1 year ago
For anyone interested in keeping up with global temperature (maps & graphs) and United States climate data, NASA GISS and NCDC have great info and analysis.
google search NASA GISS temperature
search NCDC state of the climate global
Simplex1swrhs90 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For an excellent YouTube on the latest electric car hybid technology and the exciting potential in a Smart National Power Grid see:
Plug-in Hybrids: Renewable Energy Solution of the Month
/watch?v=fmP544Svi7Y&feature=sub
goog2k 2 years ago
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
"The global-average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly soared to +0.72 deg. C in January, 2010. This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record." - Roy Spencer
google
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
Simplex1swrhs90 2 years ago
"2009: Second Warmest Year on Record; End of Warmest Decade"
"2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis, conducted by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the warmest year since modern records began in 1880. "
Simplex1swrhs90 2 years ago
"January 2000 to December 2009 was the warmest decade on record. Throughout the last three decades, the GISS surface temperature record shows an upward trend of about 0.2°C (0.36°F) per decade."
google
NASA GISS 2009 second warmest
Simplex1swrhs90 2 years ago
The video shows the global temperature change relative to the base period 1951-1980 climatology. Basically the global temperature change compared to the 30-year period (1951-80) global average temperature.
google search: NASA GISS temperature
Simplex1swrhs90 2 years ago
A few comments:
1) See the original at the NASA website. There's some explanation that I found helpful.
2) clausenogbach: The video shows the average increase in temps; so the increase was greater in Antarctica than in Africa
3) frednoname1: You're correct - there wouldn't have been remotely-sensed data for anywhere in 1884. Anything before the 1960's would be based on extrapolation from other data (ice cores, etc.)
Nurcloud 2 years ago
Updates from NCDC,
"State of the Climate Global Analysis Annual 2009"
Global Highlights:
*The 2000-2009 decade is the warmest on record, with an average global surface temperature of 0.54°C (0.96°F) above the 20th century average. This shattered the 1990s value of 0.36°C (0.65°F).
*Ocean surface temperatures (through December) tied with 2002 and 2004 as the fourth warmest on record, at 0.48°C (0.86°F) above the 20th century average.
google: NCDC state of the climate global
Simplex1swrhs90 2 years ago
If this animation is representing temperature like an ir camera i can not understand how parts of Antartica can be hotter than central Africa from time to time?????
clausenogbach 2 years ago 3
Does anyone know where I could see a model like this but over millions of years?? (preferably 600 million!). I need it for a student project.
ogfunk187 2 years ago
How did they get tempature data from siberia, the arctic and antarctic in 1884 again???
I call BS.
frednoname1 2 years ago
Russia, Alaska and Greenland seem to have been pretty hot in 2005.
Kabukita 2 years ago
Even if global warming is complete political BS it doesn't mean we should disrespect our Mother Earth. We are her children, every last one of us. So listen to her, not to these lying evil bastards we call leaders. Nature is the the True authority!
Peace on Earth
PeaceIsRad 2 years ago
Go smoke a joint or drop some acid you stupid cunt!
19dan99 2 years ago
Try explaining Climate Gate to all of the vanishing glaciers!
PeaceIsOK 2 years ago
Climate Gate!!!!
gertomaniac 2 years ago
it has been warmer in the past, 1100bc and 1300ad
texxta 2 years ago
Every planet in the solar system is warmer than usual at the moment. It has little to do with our Industry. That crap excuse has only ever been used for political leverage. It's biggest load of utter bullshit the government have ever vomitted! 1000's of PhD scientists have all said the same thing. It's completely natural.
cleetusboon 2 years ago
Wow, that would be a great disproof of global warming if it were true every planet in the solar system were warmer than usual at the moment.
I'm sure you don't believe me, so here's some proof, which I'm sure you'll never even look at but maybe others reading this will:
/watch?v=BSXgiml5UwM
fiandrhi 2 years ago
never trust NASA
warlock0110 2 years ago
It's interesting that they cut off the date at 1884- when you do that, you're shutting off the possibility that an even WARMER than today existed. For all we know, this "global warming" could be nothing.
HarryLeTroisieme 2 years ago
What you should have said was "For all I know..."
For those that have studied this issue there is no credible debate. Read what all of our historically reliable scientific institutions have said; humans are warming the planet with the use of fossil fuels and through deforestation.
Sure, natural changes in climate have, do, and will continue to occur. They've been taken into consideration.
Here's a good site where you can learn more about this.
UCSUSA(dot)org
ReduceGHGs 2 years ago
Utter utter Bull-pucky!!!
Who was around pre-1884?
This global warming bollax has to stop!!!
SB111058 2 years ago
I'm curious, what happened before 1884 ?
Maybe it was even warmer then.
Are we supposed to get scared and start using biofuels instead of fossil fuels ?
HansVerbeek 2 years ago 3
biofuels are bad too, solar, wind, water, geothermal are better.
Enleuk 2 years ago 2
not enough data
CradLeRcker 2 years ago
fweaky
campbelltheteddy 2 years ago
Not surface temperature. Otherwise you could ask how come it is red in Arctic and blue in Africa. This shows the deviance of temperature from the MEDIAN of the year. You are quite ignorant.
teemuruskeepaa 2 years ago 5
wanting new friends
comment me back au
13lost 3 years ago
lamentablemente es cierto... =(
a114U 3 years ago
es impresionante
katrinaestaki 3 years ago
I think the color means hotter (or colder) than average. So red in the Arctic doesn't mean the Arctic is hotter than the Carribean, it just means it's hotter than average for the Arctic.
capilot 3 years ago 9
Capilot is correct: This is temperature *anomaly* -- the difference between the temperature at the point in time the video's showing and some reference temperature (which is, for GISS, the average of all temperatures between 1951 and 1980). That's why that timespan has the most white (zero anomaly) areas.
There is a difference between temperature anomaly and absolute temperature.
To see the base data used in this video (more pretty pictures), visit here:
data. giss. nasa. gov/gistemp/maps/
TempestStormwind 3 years ago 13
Excellent point.
friendofyou 3 years ago 2
@TempestStormwind
Smart ass
Pivoteer24 1 year ago
@TempestStormwind Holy crap - first the title says earth surface temperature, which obviously it is not (arctic warmer than the equator) and then the title is explained as temperature anomaly - which it obviously is also not ... Greenland warmer in 1929 than in 1971 ... huh? huh? And the most worrying aspect is that this is a video released by NASA and GISS. Something is very, very wrong with their climate data. Thanks for strengthening the doubt sceptics have over NASA temp. data.
oomblikkies 1 year ago
@oomblikkies It's common in these circles to refer to temperature anomaly. Every temperature analysis group does this - even Dr. Roy Spencer and Dr. John Christy at the UAH use temperature anomaly, and they're skeptical of climate change.
The maps are generated by NASA GISS but you can get nearly identical maps (for any given year; then composite them like this video) from the Hadley center (tinyurl /4n64pbf), which uses a different analysis (and different baseline).
Ten seconds on Google btw.
TempestStormwind 1 year ago
@TempestStormwind And honestly...who really cares if the earth warms up?...by then we'll be long gone. Truth is the outer crust of the earth is only a small factor in the planet sustaining itself. Now if the planet core starts to increase dramatically then I'll be worried. If I dig a hole 50 feet and it turns out to be 10C instead of 5C I'll start scratching my head. Things change...why is this concept so damn illusive to people?
magicyte 1 year ago
chemtrails since 1995 are changing the clima.
HumildeHumano 3 years ago
Utter BS.
amoignis1987 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This video is very unrealistic. It seems as though someone has simply added an After Effect filter to a map and to animate shifts in temperature. So according to this video, in 1956 the antartic and artic were hotter than the equator and in 1996, Russia was the hottest country on earth.
They haven't exactly put much thought or common sense into this video.
Pashford 3 years ago
I could be wrong though, as a few have mentioned below that the colours are relating to variations in temperature difference in different countries, so it may not be actually temperature, more the oscillations.
Pashford 3 years ago 7
Where did you get the temperature reading from 1884? Hey also don't forget to pay for your environmental fees. The more you pay the sooner hearth will recover it's temperature.
EximiusSK 3 years ago
It comes from examining Ice cores.
rivercraig 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
los de meneame sois unos capullos fascistas
yukatanDX 3 years ago
y tu eres muy guapo y muy majo
prichuan1 3 years ago
y tu un resentido (por insultar) y un ignorante (por el insulto) ;)
ignasivt 3 years ago
No entiendo los colores. ¿Por qué hay momentos en los que el Polo Norte está más caliente que el África ecuatorial? ¿Qué significan?
Saludos
BatchDrake 3 years ago
Muy fácil BatchDrake... si en el polo note había una temperatura de -80ºC y 10 años después había solo -50ºC se ha producido una oscilación positiva de 30ºC... Si en el África ecuatorial la oscilación ha sido desde +30ºC a +40ºC la oscilación tan solo ha sido de +10ºC
En resumen.. ese gráfico indica oscilaciones de temperatura no la temperatura en si misma..
campillo 3 years ago 13
Let's the Rajoy's cousin talk about that!
wil1978 3 years ago 6
Jajaja muy bueno..
mipisha 3 years ago
OMG
cuervo1989 3 years ago
great, i hope the earth dies soon
luisdrum 3 years ago 2
There is something I dont understand at all. what is the red color means?? HOT??? why both poles are Red as hell too?
s4michi 3 years ago
finally somebody who knows what he's talking about, thnx arion52! (Y)
basambarakat 3 years ago
Hey asshole wait a couple more years... In the 70's we had global cooling...It's cyclical asswipe!
arion52 3 years ago
arion52 - And what is cycling?
st3v3mj 3 years ago
Lets all watch our planet go red. Hello people, we are cooking here!!!
punctata 4 years ago