Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
I like micrsoft computer but Apple is more better... as i know
oparunz 2 years ago
@oparunz Microsoft doesn't produce Computers, idiot -.-
druckertinte224 7 months ago
well bill good for ur Open XML but that just got u sued by I4I. just steeling another program
letstalktechshow 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A few niggers ago two niggers went out for nigger. A few niggers later, the niggersitter was calling to ask if she could cover up the nigger statue in the nigger room, the nigger said,"Take the niggers and get out of the nigger. We'll call the niggers, we don't have a nigger statue."The "nigger statue" is really a nigger that escaped from niggerland. If you don't post this nigger in 10 niggers tonight, the nigger will be in your nigger at 3:00 am with a niggersaw in his nigger
fyneztdezipimp 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i wanna suck bill gates off for bein the reason for xbox 360. ur a God bill
jgm1234567 3 years ago
Thats discusting.
mangeese 3 years ago
OOXML promises interoperability with earlier closed binary formats (the Word Doc, older Excel etc.). But it doesn't deliver. How on earth could someone be able to convert old binary files to the new format without having the specification of the old formats and a mapping to OOXML? If you are to translate some text from Chinese to English, it doesn't much help to only know English. MS-OOXML is no better than ODF here because proprietary parts can't be included in a ISO specification.
Osaispa 3 years ago 2
How sad. These representatives drink Microsoft's Kool-Aide faster than they spend Microsoft's money.
No one but Microsoft can implement the full OOXML standard. How does that work as an open standard, Billy-boy? And their promise not to sue is not guaranteed in the future as is changes to the specification.
Yes, this is just another attempt to protect their cash cow and lock users into their product which contradicts what an ISO standard should be.
0tuco0 3 years ago